2011 ojshs evaluation report · 2011 ojshs evaluation survey. 2011 ojshs participants a total of...

Evaluation Report

Prepared by

Jacob Burgoon, Project Evaluator

Northwest Ohio Center for Excellence in STEM Education

2011

TABLE OF CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION ------------------------------------------ 1

EVALUATION METHODS ---------------------------------- 1

2011 OJSHS PARTICIPANTS ----------------------------- 2

PERCEPTIONS OF THE 2011 OJSHS ---------------------- 3

Student Perceptions ------------------------------- 3

Non-Student Perceptions -------------------------- 8

SUGGESTIONS FOR FUTURE OJSHS ---------------------- 12

APPENDIX A: THE 2011 OJSHS EVALUATION SURVEY ---- 15

2011 Evaluation Report 1

INTRODUCTION

TheOhioJuniorScienceandHumanitiesSymposium(hereafterreferredtoasOJSHS)isan

annualeventinwhichOhiostudentsingrades7to12“competeforscholarshipsand

recognitionbypresentingtheresultsoftheiroriginalresearcheffortsbeforeapanelof

judgesandanaudienceoftheirpeers”1.TheOJSHSispartofthenationalJuniorScienceand

HumanitiesSymposiaProgram,whichisjointlysponsoredbytheUnitedStates

DepartmentsoftheArmy,Navy,andAirForce,incooperationwithleadingresearch

universitiesthroughoutthenation.The2011OJSHStookplaceonMarch23–25at

BowlingGreenStateUniversity,whohostedandsponsoredtheeventalongwiththeNWO

CenterforExcellenceinSTEMEducation.Thepurposeofthisreportistopresentthe

findingsofthe2011OJSHSevaluation.Thereportwillbeginadescriptionofevaluation

methods,followedbyadescriptionofthe2011OJSHSparticipants.Thereportwillthen

summarizetheperceptionsofthe2011OJSHSparticipantsbeforeconcludingwith

recommendationsforfutureOhioJuniorScienceandHumanitiesSymposia.

EVALUATION METHODS

The2011OJSHSwasevaluatedusinganonlinesurveythatwasmadeavailabletothe

participantsattheendofthelastdayoftheevent.Thelinktothesurveywasincludedin

theparticipants’registrationpacket.Thelinkwasalsoe‐mailedtotheparticipantsone

weekaftertheendoftheevent.

Theevaluationsurveyincludedseveralitemsthataskedparticipantstoratethe

qualityofseveralaspectsofthe2011OJSHS,includingthekeynotepresentation,theposter

andpaperjudges,theorganizationofposterpresentationspace,andtheawardsceremony.

ThesurveyalsoaskedparticipatingstudentstoratehoweffectivetheOJSHSwasat

increasingtheirinterestinSTEMresearchandcareers.Thesurveyincludedseveralclosed‐

endedmultiple‐choiceitems(nineforstudentsandfourfornon‐students)andseveral

open‐endeditems(threeforstudentsandfourfornon‐students)thataskedparticipantsto

1CitedfromthenationalJuniorScienceandHumanitieswebsite–www.jshs.org


writeabouttheirperceptionsofthe2011OJSHSandgivesuggestionsregardinghowit

couldbeimproved.

SeeAppendixAforthe2011OJSHSEvaluationSurvey.

2011 OJSHS PARTICIPANTS

Atotalof120studentsand81non‐studentsparticipatedinthe2011OJSHS.Studentscould

participateinthe2011OJSHSaspaperpresenters,posterpresenters,ordelegates(whodid

notpresentanyresearch).Non‐studentsincludedteachers,parents,paperandposter

judges,OJSHSstaff/volunteers(e.g.,sessionpresiders),andotherguests.Theattendance

numbersaredisplayedinthetablebelow.

Participant Attendance

StudentPresentingaPaper 24

StudentPresentingaPoster 90

StudentDelegate 6

ParentofaParticipatingStudent 11

TeacherofaParticipatingStudent 9

PaperJudge 4

PosterJudge 32

OJSHSStaffandVolunteers 20

OtherGuests 5

Total 201

Demographicinformationwascollectedfromtheparticipatingstudentsviathe

2011OJSHSEvaluationSurvey.MostofthestudentswereparticipatingintheOJSHSforthe

firsttimein2011,andamajorityofthestudentswerefemaleandWhite.Thedemographic

informationisdisplayedinthetablebelow.


DemographicVariable Values N %

One 56 70.0%

Two 20 25.0%

Numberofyears(including2011)participatingintheOJSHS Three 4 5.0%

Female 47 58.8%Gender

Male 33 41.3%AmericanIndianorAlaskanNative 0 0.0%

Asian 17 21.3%

BlackorAfricanAmerican 1 1.3%

Hispanic 1 1.3%

MiddleEastern 3 3.8%NativeHawaiianorOtherPacificIslander 0 0.0%

Racial/EthnicBackground

White,nonHispanic 57 71.3%

Note:Thetotalsampleincluded80students

Likethestudentparticipants,mostofthenon‐students(38.5%)wereparticipating

intheOJSHSforthefirsttimein2011.Themajorityofthese“first‐timers”wereparents

andposterjudges.Almostaquarter(23.1%)ofthenon‐studentsreportedparticipatingin

theOJSHSforthesixth(ormore)timein2011;mostofthesenon‐studentswereteachers

andpaperjudges.Theremainingnon‐studentsreportedparticipatingintheOJSHSforthe

second(7.7%),third(11.5%),fourth(7.7%),andfifth(11.5%)timein2011.

PERCEPTIONS OF THE 2011 OJSHS

Student Perceptions

Atotalof80studentscompletedtheevaluationsurvey.Theresponseratestothe

evaluationsurveyaredisplayedinthetablebelow.


StudentType TotalAttendance

CompletedEvaluationSurvey

ResponseRate

PaperPresenter 24 21 87.5%

PosterPresenter 90 58 64.4%

Delegate 6 1 16.7%

Total 120 80 67.7%

Thestudentswereaskedtoratethequalityofseveralcomponentsofthe2011

OJSHS.The2011OJSHSincludedseveraldaytimeandeveningeventsthroughoutitsthree‐

dayduration.However,manyoftheparticipatingstudentsonlyattendedthelastdayofthe

OJSHS,whichwasthedayonwhichthestudentspresentedtheirpapersandposters.For

thisreason,a“thisdoesnotapplytome”optionwasincludedontheevaluationsurvey.

Therefore,thenumberofresponses(n)foreachitemreflectsonlythosestudentswho

actuallyparticipatedinorinteractedwiththeOJSHScomponentinquestion.Thetable

belowcontainsthestudents’meanresponseforeachitem.Thefigureonthenextpage

illustratesthedistributionofthestudents’responses.

OJSHSComponent n Mean

WednesdayandThursdayeveningactivities 67 3.69

Keynotepresentation 69 3.81

Paperandposterjudges 79 2.96

Organizationoftheposterpresentationspace 69 2.97

Organizationofthepaperpresentationspace(s) 65 3.68

Awardsceremony 68 3.38

T‐shirts 78 3.28

2011OJSHSOverall 80 3.70

Note:1=Poor,2=Average,3=Good,4=Excellent


Wednesday and Thursday evening activities

Keynote Presentation

Paper and Poster Judges

Organization of the poster presentation space

Organization of the paper presentation space(s)

Awards Ceremony T-Shirts

2011 OJSHS Overall

Poor Average Good

Excellent

jburgoo

Rectangle

jburgoo

Rectangle

jburgoo

Rectangle

jburgoo

Rectangle

jburgoo

Rectangle

jburgoo

Rectangle

jburgoo

Rectangle

jburgoo

Rectangle


Studentswereaskedtowritecommentstoexplaintheirresponsestotheabove

questions.Themajorityofthestudents’commentswerepositive,indicatingthatthe

studentshadapositiveexperienceatthe2011OJSHS.Thetableandfiguresabove

indicatethatstudentsratedthe“paperandposterjudges”andthe“organizationofthe

posterpresentationspace”lowerthananyotheraspectofthe2011OJSHS.Accordingly,

manyofthestudents’responsesaddressedthejudgesandtheposterspace.Threestudents

mentionedthatalargervarietyofjudges(intermsofexpertise)wouldhaveimprovedthe

paperandposterjudging.Severalstudentsnotedthatthespaceforposterpresentations

wastoosmall,andafewstudentsfurthercommentedthatsomestudentshadmorespace

thanothers.

Inadditiontoratingthequalityofthe2011OJSHS,studentswerealsoaskedtorate

theimpactofthe2011OJSHSontheirinterestinSTEM(science,technology,engineering,

andmathematics)researchcareers.Thetableandfigurebelowcontainthestudents’mean

responseanddistributionofresponsesforeachitem,respectively.

Item n Mean

ParticipatingintheOJSHSincreasedmyinterestinSTEMresearch. 79 3.58

TheOJSHSprovidedmewithvaluableopportunitiestonetworkwithotherstudentsandSTEMprofessionals.

80 3.39

TheOJSHSincreasedmydesiretopursueacareerinSTEM. 80 3.30

Note:1=DefinitelyDisagree,2=KindofDisagree,3=KindofAgree,4=DefinitelyAgree


Thestudentswereaskedtodescribetheirexperienceatthe2011OJSHSintheir

ownwords.Oneofthemainthemesthatemergedfromthestudents’responseswasthe

opportunityforstudentstudentinteraction.Manystudentswroteaboutmeetingnew

peopleatthe2011OJSHS.Someofthestudentswrote:

Ilikedtheopportunitytomeetotherstudentsandlistentotheresearchthattheywereconducting.

Ilikedbeingabletomeetnewpeopleandmakesomefriends.

IlovedgettingtoknowpeoplewhohavesimilarinterestsinSTEMeducation.

Ilikedmeetingandtalkingtopeoplemyownageaboutourprojectsandinterests.

Anothermajortheme,relatedtothefirst,regardingstudents’experiencesatthe

2011OJSHSwaslearningfromothers.Manystudentsmentionedthattheyenjoyed

lookingatandtalkingaboutotherstudents’projects.Studentsreportedlearningmore

aboutscienceandbecomingmoreinterestedinscienceasaresultofinteractingwithother

studentsatthe2011OJSHS.Somestudentswrote:

Itwasgreattoseesuchahighqualityofprojectsandknowwhatotherswerecapableofdoingworkatsuchahighlevel.Itreallyinspiredme.

Interest in STEM Research

Networking Opportunities

Desire to Pursue STEM careers

Definitely Disagree Kind of Disagree Kind of Agree

Definitely Agree

jburgoo

Rectangle

jburgoo

Rectangle

jburgoo

Rectangle


Ireallyenjoyedseeingotherpeople’sprojectsandresearch.TherearemanyfieldsthatIfoundveryinterestingandneverwouldhavethoughttoexplore.

IlovedthatIwasbeingexposedtootherpeoplethatdidresearchinlevelshigherthanmebecauseithelpedmecreateideasofprojectsthatIcoulddo.

Myexperienceatthe2011OJSHShasmademeevenmoreinterestedinscience,anditwasveryinspiringwatchingthepaperpresentersandhasmademestartthinkingofabigger,moreadvancedprojectfornextyear.

Mostofthestudentswhocommentedaboutthenon‐presentationactivities(i.e.,ice

skating,curling,labtours)mentionedthattheyenjoyedthem,althoughtherewereafew

studentswhosuggestedthatthelabtoursbemadeoptional.Onethemethatemerged

regardingfromstudents’responsesaboutthenonpresentationactivitieswasadesire

formorefreetime.Althoughmoststudentsmentionedthattheyenjoyedtheactivities,

manyindicatedthattheywouldhavelikedmorefreetimetodowhattheywanted.Some

studentswrote:

Iwouldmaybeliketobebackatthehotelalittleearliertohavetimespentrelaxing,buttheactivitieswereenjoyable.

Ididnotlikethelackoffreedomgivenduringthedaystowhatwewant.

Ididnotlikethefactthatwedidnothavealotofdowntimetointeractwith[otherstudents].

Finally,83%ofstudentswhoareeligibletoreturnnextyear(i.e.,not12thgraders)

reportedthatisveryormoderatelylikelythattheywillbeinvolvedwiththeOJSHSnext

year.

Non-Student Perceptions

Atotalof26non‐studentscompletedtheevaluationsurvey.Theresponseratestothe

evaluationsurveyaredisplayedinthetablebelow.


Non‐studentType

TotalAttendance

CompletedEvaluationSurvey

ResponseRate

Parent 11 2 18.2%

Teacher 9 7 77.8%

PaperJudge 4 3 75.0%

PosterJudge 32 9 28.1%OJSHSStaff/Volunteer 20 5 25.0%

Total 76 26 34.2%

Likethestudents,thenon‐studentparticipantswereaskedtorateseveral

componentsofthe2011OJSHS.Manyofthenon‐studentparticipants(e.g.,posterand

paperjudges)onlyparticipatedinthelastdayofthe2011OJSHS.Therefore,theresponses

to“onlineregistrationprocess,”“WednesdayandThursdayeveningactivities,”“keynote

presentation,”and“awardsceremony”mostlyrepresentteachersandparentsof

participatingstudents.Thetablebelowcontainsthenon‐students’meanresponsetoeach

item.Thefigureonthenextpageillustratesthenon‐students’distributionofresponsesfor

eachitem.

OJSHSComponent n Mean

Onlineregistrationprocess 11 3.00

WednesdayandThursdayeveningactivities 12 3.83

Keynotepresentation 15 4.00

Organizationoftheposterpresentationspace 22 3.45

Organizationofthepaperpresentationspace(s) 17 3.82

Awardsceremony 12 3.58

2011OJSHSOverall 22 3.77

Note:1=Poor,2=Average,3=Good,4=Excellent


Online Registration

Wednesday and Thursday evening activities

Keynote presentation Organization of the poster presentation space


Awards Ceremony

2011 OJSHS Overall

Poor Average Good

Excellent

jburgoo

Rectangle

jburgoo

Rectangle

jburgoo

Rectangle

jburgoo

Rectangle

jburgoo

Rectangle

jburgoo

Rectangle


Non‐studentparticipantswereaskedtowritecommentstoexplaintheirresponses

totheabovequestions.Thetableandfiguresaboveindicatethatnonstudentsrated

the“onlineregistration”andthe“organizationoftheposterpresentationspace”lower

thananyotheraspectofthe2011OJSHS.Thecommentsexplainedthatthe“posterswere

abitmorecrowdedthisyearthaninthepast”andthatthere“needstobebetterdefined

posterspaceforeachparticipant”.Theonlycommentabouttheonlineregistrationwas

that“teachersneedalittlemoreinformationtoensurethatthestudentsareregistered”.

Inadditiontoratingthequalityofthe2011OJSHS,thenon‐studentparticipants

werealsoaskedtodescribetheimpactofthe2011OJSHSonstudents’interestinand

understandingofSTEM.Althoughitislikelythatmostoftheparticipatingstudents

werealreadyinterestedinSTEM,manynonstudentparticipantssuggestedthatthe

OJSHSprovidedstudentswithmotivationtocontinuelearningandconducting

researchaboutSTEM.Someoftheparticipantswrote:

Theexperienceseemstogreatlymotivatethestudentstodomoreinthefield.Theywanttoresearchmoreanddohigherqualityworkafterwatchingthepaperpresentations.

Theyoungerstudentsespeciallywereappreciativeoffeedbackandshowedmarkedinterestinreturningnextyear.

Thiseventpiquesourstudents’interestsandhasmanyinterestedincontinuingresearchandreturningnextyear!

Thenon‐studentparticipantswerealsoaskedtodescribetheirexperienceofthe

2011OJSHSintheirownwords.Theoveralltoneoftheresponseswaspositive–many

participantsreportedthattheyenjoyeddifferentaspectsoftheeventaswellastheeventin

general.Theposterjudgesspecificallystatedthattheyenjoyedtalkingtothestudents.One

posterjudgewrote:

Myexperienceasaposterjudgewasenjoyableandinteresting.Thestudentswereverywellspoken,preparedandenthusiastic,andspeakingtothemwasthebestpartoftheexperience.


Manyofthenon‐studentparticipantsechoedthecommentsofthestudents,

emphasizingtheroleofOJSHSinfosteringpositivestudent‐studentinteractions.Two

participantswrote:

It’smorethanacompetition.Itallowsthestudentstointeractwithoneanotherandshareideas.Ilovethataspectofit.

Ienjoythefactthatforabout48hoursmykidscanhangouttogetherwithothergreatkidsandbuildrelationshipsaswellaslearnbetterresearchskills.

Finally,87.5%ofthenon‐studentparticipantsreportedthatisverylikelythatthey

willbeinvolvedwiththeOJSHSnextyear.Theremaining12.5%reportedthatitisnotall

likelythattheywillbeinvolvedwithOJSHSnextyear.

SUGGESTIONS FOR FUTURE OJSHS

Thefindingsfromthe2011OJSHSevaluationsurveyindicatethatthe2011OJSHSwas

perceivedtobeahigh‐qualityandimpactfuleventbystudentandnon‐studentparticipants

alike.Thefindingsdemonstratethatthe2011OJSHSprovidedmanyopportunitiesfor

studentstointeractwithandlearnfromotherstudentsandSTEMprofessionals,and

helpedstimulatemoreinterestinstudentstolearnaboutandconductSTEMresearch.

Thesepositivefindingsnotwithstanding,therearestillwaysinwhichtheOJSHScouldbe

improved.

AnyeventsuchasOJSHSshouldcontinuallyseektoimproveitselfbysoliciting

suggestionsfromitsstakeholders.Inkeepingwiththisphilosophy,all2011OJSHS

participantswereaskedtoprovidesuggestionsforhowtheOJSHScouldbeimprovedinthe

future.Thesuggestionsthatfollowarebasedontheparticipants’reportedsuggestionsas

wellastheparticipants’otherresponsesandcomments.


1 MODIFY THE SYSTEM BY WHICH POSTERS ARE JUDGED

Thisgeneralsuggestionisactuallycomprisedoftwomorespecificsuggestionsaboutthe

posterjudgingsystem.Manyoftheparticipants(bothstudentsandnon‐students)

commentedontheposterjudging,andsuggestedsomewaysthatitcouldbeimproved.

Onesuggestionthatcamemostlyfromparticipatingstudentswastoensurea

greatervarietyamongthejudgesintermsoftheirexpertise.Somestudentsperceivedthat

mostofthejudgescamefromthe“hardscience”fields,andsuggestedthatmorejudgesbe

recruitedfromfieldslikepsychologyandothersocialsciences.

Anothersuggestionthatwasgivenbystudentsandnon‐studentsalikewastohave

twojudgesevaluateeachposter.Thissuggestioncouldbebasedonthefactthejudging

rubriccontainsseverallargescalesthatmightbeuseddifferentlybytwodifferentjudges.

Havingateamofjudgesforeachstudentmighthelptostandardizethescoringprocess.

Someoftheparticipantswrote:

Thejudgingsystemwasperhapsalittletoosubjective–astructurewithmultiplejudgesperposterwouldhelp.

Thesubjectivityoftheposterjudging–eachstudentevaluatedbyonlyonejudge–maynotbefairtoallthestudents.

2 RE-ORGANIZE THE SPACE FOR POSTER PRESENTATIONS

Issuesregardingthespaceforposterpresentationswereamongthemostcommentedon

bythe2011OJSHSparticipants.Bothstudentsandnon‐studentsbelievethatchangesneed

tobemadetoimprovetheposterspace.Thegreatestconcernwasthelackofspacethat

studentshadtopresenttheirposters.Onenon‐studentparticipantsuggestedthata

ballroombeusedinsteadoftheroomthatwasusedthisyear.Someoftheparticipants

wrote:

Theonlythingthatwasslightlynegativewasthatposterswerecrammedveryclosenexttooneanother,sotherewaslittlespacetotalktotheposter’spresenter.

Wishtherewasmorespaceforposterpresenters.


Anotherissueregardingtheposterspacewasthelackofconsistencyintheamount

ofroomthateachstudenthadtosetuptheirposter.Sincetheposterspacewasmadeupof

aseriesoftallpanels,studentswhoarrivedearlycouldpotentiallyusemorespacethan

thosewhoarrivedlate.Onesolutionmightbetoestablishmeasurementstandards(for

howtallandwideapostercanbe)towhichstudentsmustadhere.Notsurprisingly,the

posterpresenterswerethemainsourceforthissuggestion.Someofthestudentswrote:

IenjoyedeverythingIwasinvolvedin,butIjustnoticedthatsomestudentsdidn’thaveasmuchspaceasothersintheposterjudging.

Ithinkitneedstobemorestrictlyenforcedaboutspaceforposterpresentation.Myprojectreceivedabout2feetlessthanitwassupposedtoinwidthduetoothers’spaceexpandments[sic].

Thespacefortheposterswerevaried.Forexample,Ihadabout1and¾panelswhilethegirlnexttobeonly[had]1and¼panels.Thetwopeoplenexttoherbothtookalittlemorethan2panelsforthemselves.BothIandthegirlnexttomewouldhavelikedtohavemorespacetolaystuffout.

3 CONTINUE TO OFFER ICE SKATING, CURLING, AND CAMPUS LAB TOURS

Manystudentsprovidedpositivecommentsregardingthenon‐presentationactivities.

Specifically,thestudentsmentionedthattheyenjoyediceskating,curling,andthecampus

labtours.Somestudents,however,suggestedthatthelabtoursbemadeoptionalorthat

studentsshouldbeallowedtochoosewhichlab(s)theytour.Thiswouldallowstudentsto

havemorefreetimeiftheychoseto,whichwasanothercommonmessageamongthe

students.


APPENDIX A:

THE 2011 OJSHS EVALUATION SURVEY

2011 OJSHS Evaluation Survey2011 OJSHS Evaluation Survey2011 OJSHS Evaluation Survey2011 OJSHS Evaluation Survey

Members of the Ohio Junior Science and Humanities Symposium Program Evaluation Committee are always seeking ways to improve future Symposia. The best way to do this is to find out what participants think of the Symposium, and use their comments and suggestions to make future Symposia better. Please take a few minutes to complete the following evaluation survey and tell us what you thought about the 2011 Ohio Junior Science and Humanities Symposium. We appreciate your cooperation! Thank you for your assistance in improving the Ohio JSHS.

Which of the following describes you and your participation at OJSHS?

We Hope You Enjoyed the 2011 Ohio Junior Science and Humanities Symposium!

Student presented a paper

nmlkj

Student presented a poster

nmlkj

Student delegate did not present a paper or poster

nmlkj

Parent of a participating student

nmlkj

Teacher of a participating student

nmlkj

Paper judge

nmlkj

Poster judge

nmlkj

OJSHS staff member

nmlkj

Other (please specify)

nmlkj

jburgoo

2011 OJSHS


How many years (counting this one) have you participated in the OJSHS?

What is your gender?

Which of following best describes the way you define your racial/ethnic background?

Students, Tell Us What You Think!

One (this is my first year)

nmlkj

Two

nmlkj

Three

nmlkj

Four

nmlkj

Five

nmlkj

Six

nmlkj

Female

nmlkj

Male

nmlkj

American Indian or Alaskan Native

gfedc

Asian

gfedc

Black or African American

gfedc

Hispanic

gfedc

Middle Eastern

gfedc

Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander

gfedc

White, non Hispanic

gfedc

jburgoo

2011 OJSHS

2011 OJSHS Evaluation Survey2011 OJSHS Evaluation Survey2011 OJSHS Evaluation Survey2011 OJSHS Evaluation SurveyPlease rate the following aspects of the 2011 OJSHS.

Please rate your level of agreement/disagreement with the following statements.

Participating in the OJSHS (conducting and presenting my research) increased my interest in STEM (science, technology, engineering, and/or mathematics) research.

The OJSHS provided me with valuable opportunities to network with other students and STEM professionals.

The OJSHS increased my desire to purse a career in STEM.

Poor Average Good ExcellentThis doesn't apply to

meWednesday and Thursday evening activities (e.g., ice skating, banquet)

nmlkj nmlkj nmlkj nmlkj nmlkj

Keynote Presentation (Gene Poor, "Searching for the AHA")


Paper and poster judges nmlkj nmlkj nmlkj nmlkj nmlkj





Awards ceremony nmlkj nmlkj nmlkj nmlkj nmlkj

Tshirts nmlkj nmlkj nmlkj nmlkj nmlkj

2011 OJSHS overall nmlkj nmlkj nmlkj nmlkj nmlkj

Definitely Disagree Kind of Disagree Kind of Agree Definitely Agree

Please select your choice. nmlkj nmlkj nmlkj nmlkj





Please provide some comments to futher explain your above ratings.

55

66

jburgoo

2011 OJSHS


How many years (counting this one) have you been involved with the OJSHS?

Please rate the following aspects of the 2011 OJSHS.

As a [Q1], what is your perception of the 2011 OJSHS's impact on students' interest in and understanding of STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics)?

Please Tell Us What You Think

Poor Average Good ExcellentThis doesn't apply to

me

Online registration process nmlkj nmlkj nmlkj nmlkj nmlkj

Wednesday and Thursday evening activities (e.g., ice skating, banquet)


Keynote presentation (Gene Poor, "Searching for the AHA")






Awards ceremony nmlkj nmlkj nmlkj nmlkj nmlkj

2011 OJSHS overall nmlkj nmlkj nmlkj nmlkj nmlkj

55

66

One (this is my first year)

nmlkj

Two

nmlkj

Three

nmlkj

Four

nmlkj

Five

nmlkj

Six or more

nmlkj

Please provide some comments to futher explain your above ratings.

55

66

jburgoo

2011 OJSHS


Please describe your experience at the 2011 OJSHS in your own words. Include the the aspects of your experience that you liked as well as those that you didn't like.

What suggestions do you have for next year's OJSHS? Is there is anything that you definitely would want to see kept or removed? Is there anything you would change or add?

How likely is it that you will participate in/be involved with the OJSHS next year? Students in the 12th grade, please select "This does not apply to me".

THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR YOUR COOPERATION!

We Want to Know About Your 2011 OJSHS Experience

55

66

55

66

Not at all likely

nmlkj

Very slightly likely

nmlkj

Moderately likely

nmlkj

Very likely

nmlkj

This does not apply to me

nmlkj

jburgoo

2011 OJSHS

2011 ojshs evaluation report · 2011 ojshs evaluation survey. 2011 ojshs participants a total of...

Documents