2010 appellate judicial attorneys institute  october 27, 2010 burlingame, ca

88
2010 Appellate Judicial Attorneys Institute October 27, 2010 Burlingame, CA FETAL ALCOHOL SPECTRUM DISORDERS: FROM COMPETENCY TO STAND TRIAL TO CLEMENCY Richard S. Adler, M.D. Natalie Novick Brown, Ph.D. www.FASDExperts.com Seattle, WA

Upload: ketan

Post on 04-Feb-2016

35 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

FETAL ALCOHOL SPECTRUM DISORDERS: FROM COMPETENCY TO STAND TRIAL TO CLEMENCY Richard S. Adler, M.D. Natalie Novick Brown, Ph.D. www.FASDExperts.com Seattle, WA. 2010 Appellate Judicial Attorneys Institute  October 27, 2010 Burlingame, CA. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 2010 Appellate Judicial Attorneys Institute  October 27, 2010 Burlingame, CA

2010 Appellate Judicial Attorneys Institute October 27, 2010Burlingame, CA

FETAL ALCOHOL SPECTRUM DISORDERS: FROM COMPETENCY TO STAND TRIAL

TO CLEMENCY

Richard S. Adler, M.D.Natalie Novick Brown, Ph.D.

www.FASDExperts.com Seattle, WA

Page 2: 2010 Appellate Judicial Attorneys Institute  October 27, 2010 Burlingame, CA
Page 3: 2010 Appellate Judicial Attorneys Institute  October 27, 2010 Burlingame, CA
Page 4: 2010 Appellate Judicial Attorneys Institute  October 27, 2010 Burlingame, CA

http://www.good.is/post/california-s-got-a-new-death-chamber-um-yay/ accessed October 26, 2010.

Page 5: 2010 Appellate Judicial Attorneys Institute  October 27, 2010 Burlingame, CA

FASDFASD

Page 6: 2010 Appellate Judicial Attorneys Institute  October 27, 2010 Burlingame, CA
Page 7: 2010 Appellate Judicial Attorneys Institute  October 27, 2010 Burlingame, CA

BRANDON RHODE

Triple murder 1988 – 2 children and father in their home – during burglary

Jones County, GA Rhode: 18y, 9 months at the

time of crime Same-aged co-defendant

Page 8: 2010 Appellate Judicial Attorneys Institute  October 27, 2010 Burlingame, CA

BRANDON RHODE

Neuropsychological testing – organic impairment attributed to substance use.

FASD suspected, but mother denied alcohol use “prior to pregnancy”

Death sentence

Page 9: 2010 Appellate Judicial Attorneys Institute  October 27, 2010 Burlingame, CA

BRANDON RHODE

State Habeas appeal ca. 2006 Seen by psychiatrist with expertise

in adolescent brain development who diagnosed FASD, pre- Roper v. Simmons decision

Habeas court found prenatal alcohol exposure history not credible

Page 10: 2010 Appellate Judicial Attorneys Institute  October 27, 2010 Burlingame, CA

BRANDON RHODE

Suicide of Death Row friend in next cell 1/2010

Infrequent, non-scheduled MH visits

FASD not diagnosed formally by correctional staff

No treatment aimed at impulsivity/FASD

Page 11: 2010 Appellate Judicial Attorneys Institute  October 27, 2010 Burlingame, CA

BRANDON RHODE

Clemency hearing 9/17/2010 Clemency Board found FASD

relevant and present Clemency Board inquiry included:

Religious beliefs Remorse Disciplinary Report history

Clemency denied 9/17/2010 at 3:30 p.m.

Page 12: 2010 Appellate Judicial Attorneys Institute  October 27, 2010 Burlingame, CA

BRANDON RHODE MH visit 5 minutes 9/17/2010 No MH follow-up scheduled, or

mentioned On “Death Watch” BJR provided

razor 9/17/2010 by staff, not taken back, despite hx of suicide, dx/tx for Depression

Page 13: 2010 Appellate Judicial Attorneys Institute  October 27, 2010 Burlingame, CA

BRANDON RHODE

9/21/2010: Suicide attempt hemorrhagic shock

9/21/2010: MH visit 5 minutes. No change in tx plan.

9/24/2010: Examination by RSA 9/27/2010: Execution

Page 14: 2010 Appellate Judicial Attorneys Institute  October 27, 2010 Burlingame, CA

“If we excuse those whose traumatic life experiences have injured them – but

not deprived them of the capacity to exercise responsibility and restraint – we leave society dangerously at risk.”

GOLDEN J: MESSAGE IN A BOTTLE: THE MAKING OF FETAL ALCOHOL SYNDROMECAMBRIDGE, MA: HARVARD UNIVERSITY PRESS, 2005, 154.

CALIFORNIA GOVERNOR PETE WILSON, 1992IN RE: THE CLEMENCY APPEAL OF

ROBERT ALTON HARRIS

Page 15: 2010 Appellate Judicial Attorneys Institute  October 27, 2010 Burlingame, CA

“If we excuse those whose traumatic life experiences have injured them – but

not deprived them of the capacity to exercise responsibility and restraint – we leave society dangerously at risk.”

GOLDEN J: MESSAGE IN A BOTTLE: THE MAKING OF FETAL ALCOHOL SYNDROMECAMBRIDGE, MA: HARVARD UNIVERSITY PRESS, 2005, 154.

CALIFORNIA GOVERNOR PETE WILSON, 1992IN RE: THE CLEMENCY APPEAL OF

ROBERT ALTON HARRIS

Page 16: 2010 Appellate Judicial Attorneys Institute  October 27, 2010 Burlingame, CA

JEFFREY LANDRIGAN

Page 17: 2010 Appellate Judicial Attorneys Institute  October 27, 2010 Burlingame, CA

Justice Clarence Thomas, writing for the slim majority, said the never-presented evidence "would not have changed the result.“

The sentencing judge has now stated under oath that if she knew about Landrigan's brain damage, fetal alcohol syndrome, genetic predispositions and parental abandonment, she would not have sentenced him to death.

MAN ON DEATH ROW DESERVES LIFE TERMTRIAL JUDGE NEVER WAS TOLD OF HIS BRAIN DAMAGE

Oct. 21, 2010 A. Bates Butler III , Former US Attorney for Arizona

The Arizona Republic

Page 18: 2010 Appellate Judicial Attorneys Institute  October 27, 2010 Burlingame, CA

Justice Clarence Thomas, writing for the slim majority, said the never-presented evidence "would not have changed the result.“

The sentencing judge has now stated under oath that if she knew about Landrigan's brain damage, fetal alcohol syndrome, genetic predispositions and parental abandonment, she would not have sentenced him to death.

MAN ON DEATH ROW DESERVES LIFE TERMTRIAL JUDGE NEVER WAS TOLD OF HIS BRAIN DAMAGE

Oct. 21, 2010 A. Bates Butler III , Former US Attorney for Arizona

The Arizona Republic

Page 19: 2010 Appellate Judicial Attorneys Institute  October 27, 2010 Burlingame, CA

FASD SHOULD BE RAISED FASD SHOULD BE RAISED AS EARLY AS POSSIBLE AS EARLY AS POSSIBLE IN THE LEGAL PROCESSIN THE LEGAL PROCESS

Page 20: 2010 Appellate Judicial Attorneys Institute  October 27, 2010 Burlingame, CA

JUST LIKE MENTAL RETARDATION, JUST LIKE MENTAL RETARDATION, FASD MUST BE PRESUMED FASD MUST BE PRESUMED

TO BE PRESENT TO BE PRESENT UNTIL SHOWN TO BE OTHERWISEUNTIL SHOWN TO BE OTHERWISE

Page 21: 2010 Appellate Judicial Attorneys Institute  October 27, 2010 Burlingame, CA
Page 22: 2010 Appellate Judicial Attorneys Institute  October 27, 2010 Burlingame, CA

SUGGESTIBILITY

Page 23: 2010 Appellate Judicial Attorneys Institute  October 27, 2010 Burlingame, CA
Page 24: 2010 Appellate Judicial Attorneys Institute  October 27, 2010 Burlingame, CA

GUDJONSSON SUGGESTIBILITY SCALE STORY 2 (GSS-2)

GSS2 Subscale

FASD Sample (n=7)

Mean/SD

UKGeneral

Population Mean/SD

UK Court Referrals

Mean/SD

Immediate Recall 7.8/6.6 19.7/6.1 *** 10.9/7.1

Delayed Recall 6.1/5.3 18.4/6.0 *** 9.2/6.9

Yield 1 7.9/4.2 4.5/3.6 6.5/4.1

Yield 2 9.3/2.0 5.5/4.0 *** 7.9/4.6

Shift 9.9/3.2 3.0/3.0 *** 4.4/3.6 ***

Total Suggestibility 17.7/4.9 7.5/5.3 *** 10.9/6.0 **

* = Significant at < .05** = Significant at < .01*** = Significant at <.005

Page 26: 2010 Appellate Judicial Attorneys Institute  October 27, 2010 Burlingame, CA

HIGH INDEX OF SUSPICIONHIGH INDEX OF SUSPICION

DILIGENT MITIGATION EFFORTSDILIGENT MITIGATION EFFORTS

STEP-WISE EXPERT CONSULTATIONSTEP-WISE EXPERT CONSULTATION

Page 27: 2010 Appellate Judicial Attorneys Institute  October 27, 2010 Burlingame, CA

SYLLABUSSYLLABUS

1.1. Novick Brown: FASD “Red Flags”Novick Brown: FASD “Red Flags”

2.2. Novick Brown: FASD throughout the legal Novick Brown: FASD throughout the legal

process – theory and practice/ case examplesprocess – theory and practice/ case examples

3.3. Adler: Practical “Action Steps”Adler: Practical “Action Steps”

4.4. Adler: Summary/ Q & AAdler: Summary/ Q & A

Page 28: 2010 Appellate Judicial Attorneys Institute  October 27, 2010 Burlingame, CA

NATALIE NOVICK BROWN, PH.D.NATALIE NOVICK BROWN, PH.D.

Page 29: 2010 Appellate Judicial Attorneys Institute  October 27, 2010 Burlingame, CA

SCREENINGSCREENING& RED FLAGS& RED FLAGS

Page 30: 2010 Appellate Judicial Attorneys Institute  October 27, 2010 Burlingame, CA

BIRTH MOTHER

Substance abuse history Prostitution history Cognitive impairment Criminal history CPS history Absent during client’s childhood Psychiatric history (e.g., depression, psychosis) Extensive medical history Death from alcohol-related causes

Page 31: 2010 Appellate Judicial Attorneys Institute  October 27, 2010 Burlingame, CA

CLIENT RECORD REVIEW

Prematurity / birth complications / seizures Failure to thrive or childhood growth deficiency

(short and/or thin) Developmental delay Learning disabilities / SPECIAL EDUCATION Speech and language services in elementary

school Poor grades, school drop out Low achievement test scores Behavior problems in school ADD / ADHD behavior/diagnosis ODD / CD diagnoses

Page 32: 2010 Appellate Judicial Attorneys Institute  October 27, 2010 Burlingame, CA

CLIENT LIFE HISTORY

Mom abuses alcohol/drugs Involvement with child welfare Adoption / foster or relative placements / juvenile

commitments Special Education / learning disabilities Multiple diagnoses in childhood (espec. ADD/ADHD) Rule-breaking behaviors (lies, cheats, steals, fights) Disrupted education (60% drop out of school) Substance abuse (29% adolescents, 46% adults) Confinement (~ 50%) Unstable adult lifestyle (improves with structure)

Page 33: 2010 Appellate Judicial Attorneys Institute  October 27, 2010 Burlingame, CA

WHAT WHAT DOESN’TDOESN’T MATTER MATTER

Page 34: 2010 Appellate Judicial Attorneys Institute  October 27, 2010 Burlingame, CA

FAS “Face” in Young Child(From Streissguth and Little, Unit 5, Project Cork, Slide/Teaching Curriculum on

Alcohol Use and Its Medical Consequences, 1994)

Diagnostic Criteria

Associated Features

Epicanthal folds

Flat midfaceLow nasal bridge

Short noseMinor ear anomalies

Micrognathia

1. Short palpebral

fissures

2. Flat philtrum

3. Thin upper lip

Streissguth (1994)

Page 35: 2010 Appellate Judicial Attorneys Institute  October 27, 2010 Burlingame, CA
Page 36: 2010 Appellate Judicial Attorneys Institute  October 27, 2010 Burlingame, CA

FAS Family Resource Institute

Page 37: 2010 Appellate Judicial Attorneys Institute  October 27, 2010 Burlingame, CA
Page 38: 2010 Appellate Judicial Attorneys Institute  October 27, 2010 Burlingame, CA

WHAT WHAT DOESDOES MATTER MATTER

Page 39: 2010 Appellate Judicial Attorneys Institute  October 27, 2010 Burlingame, CA
Page 40: 2010 Appellate Judicial Attorneys Institute  October 27, 2010 Burlingame, CA
Page 41: 2010 Appellate Judicial Attorneys Institute  October 27, 2010 Burlingame, CA

ATTORNEY-CLIENT INTERVIEWS

Immature, naïve, eager to please (lower IQ) Stubborn, “difficult” (IQ-related) Has problems providing sequential, detailed

narrative ( lots of: “one thing led to another”)

Adds little to conversations (few questions about defense details) / exclusive focus on length of incarceration time

Doesn’t remember what you tell him from appointment to appointment

Page 42: 2010 Appellate Judicial Attorneys Institute  October 27, 2010 Burlingame, CA

INSTANT OFFENSE

Illogical actions with high risk of detection “Simple” plan with no contingencies (focus is

only on the objective w/ no exit strategy) Impulsive, aggressive actions in reaction to

unexpected events (“fight or flight”) Over-reacts to confrontation with excessive

aggression More sophisticated, experienced co-defendants

Page 43: 2010 Appellate Judicial Attorneys Institute  October 27, 2010 Burlingame, CA

POST-ARREST

Immediately / easily waives rights Easily manipulated Initial denial during interrogation followed by

guileless confessions that most offenders would never make

“Over” confesses (to anything and everything) Behavioral regression during confession (e.g.,

tears) Emotional detachment (e.g., flat affect, fails to see

seriousness of crime)

Page 44: 2010 Appellate Judicial Attorneys Institute  October 27, 2010 Burlingame, CA

PRIOR CRIMINAL HISTORY

Juvenile record: running away and/or lots of stealing

Offenses don’t “make sense” (e.g., no risk-benefit consideration)

Impulsive, opportunistic crimes Prone to multiple probation violations Assaults involve over-reactions (may occur in

combination with substance use)

Page 45: 2010 Appellate Judicial Attorneys Institute  October 27, 2010 Burlingame, CA

“FASD CRIMES”

General crimes (60%) shoplifting/theft (36%) burglary (15%) DV (15%) assault (17%)

Sexual crimes (50%) promiscuity (26%) sexual advances, including assault (18%)

Page 46: 2010 Appellate Judicial Attorneys Institute  October 27, 2010 Burlingame, CA

PLEA BARGAIN

Felony Harassment (WA; 2008): prosecutor agreed to reduce charges to

misdemeanor harassment

Murder 1/Robbery (PA; 2008) Prosecutor takes death off table in

exchange for bench trial

Page 47: 2010 Appellate Judicial Attorneys Institute  October 27, 2010 Burlingame, CA

COMPETENCY TO STAND TRIALCOMPETENCY TO STAND TRIAL

State v. Jesse James Scholler, Snohomish County Superior court Case Nos. 08-8-00426-1, 08-9-00443-1

17 y/o male charged with 2 cts Arson 1

Judge Thomas J. Wynne (August 6, 2008)

Page 48: 2010 Appellate Judicial Attorneys Institute  October 27, 2010 Burlingame, CA

"Jesse has a 5th grade reading level but he comprehends

what he reads at only the 3rd grade level. He is at the

educational level of an 8 year old….He does have FAS. As

a result of that, he does have significant executive

functioning deficits. His verbal skills are such that

apparently those deficits are masked to a large extent to

those who don't know him or don't have a better

understanding of what those deficits are….

Page 49: 2010 Appellate Judicial Attorneys Institute  October 27, 2010 Burlingame, CA

“I am persuaded that evidence in this case reflects that

Jesse does not have the capability to meaningfully assist

his attorney in his own defense due to his executive

functioning deficits as a result of FAS, and that based on

that he would not be competent to assist in his own

defense in this matter….I do not see any ability to restore

competency given the nature of the disability."

Page 50: 2010 Appellate Judicial Attorneys Institute  October 27, 2010 Burlingame, CA

SENTENCINGSENTENCING

ARSON 1 (WA; 2008) Downward departure

ROBBERY 1 (WA; 2008) Low end of range

VEHICULAR HOMICIDE (WA; 2008) Downward departure

AGGRAVATED ASSAULT (2 cts; WA; 2010) Low end of range

AGGRAVATED SEXUAL ASSAULT (WA, 2009) Downward departure

Page 51: 2010 Appellate Judicial Attorneys Institute  October 27, 2010 Burlingame, CA

SENTENCING

CAPITAL MURDER

LWOPP (TX, 2010) LWOPP (NV, 2009, 2010)

Page 52: 2010 Appellate Judicial Attorneys Institute  October 27, 2010 Burlingame, CA

SENTENCING:Vulnerable Victim

SEXUAL ASSAULT (CO, 2008) Enhanced sentence for perpetratorSEXUAL ASSAULT (OR, 2008) Plea bargain

Page 53: 2010 Appellate Judicial Attorneys Institute  October 27, 2010 Burlingame, CA

POST-CONVICTION RELIEF/HABEAS

MIRANDA COMPETENCY & MENTAL STATE court granted habeas petition (NJ, 2006)

COMPETENCY/MENTAL STATE/SENTENCING (pending)

2007 (SC) 2010 (TN) 2010 (AZ)

Page 54: 2010 Appellate Judicial Attorneys Institute  October 27, 2010 Burlingame, CA

WAIVER/REVERSE WAIVERWAIVER/REVERSE WAIVER

Page 55: 2010 Appellate Judicial Attorneys Institute  October 27, 2010 Burlingame, CA

RICHARD S. ADLER, M.D.RICHARD S. ADLER, M.D.

Page 56: 2010 Appellate Judicial Attorneys Institute  October 27, 2010 Burlingame, CA

ACTION STEPSACTION STEPS

Page 57: 2010 Appellate Judicial Attorneys Institute  October 27, 2010 Burlingame, CA

FASD CHECKLISTFASD CHECKLIST

Page 58: 2010 Appellate Judicial Attorneys Institute  October 27, 2010 Burlingame, CA
Page 59: 2010 Appellate Judicial Attorneys Institute  October 27, 2010 Burlingame, CA
Page 60: 2010 Appellate Judicial Attorneys Institute  October 27, 2010 Burlingame, CA

CHILDHOOD PHOTOGRAPHSCHILDHOOD PHOTOGRAPHS

Page 61: 2010 Appellate Judicial Attorneys Institute  October 27, 2010 Burlingame, CA

DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHDIGITAL PHOTOGRAPH

Page 62: 2010 Appellate Judicial Attorneys Institute  October 27, 2010 Burlingame, CA
Page 63: 2010 Appellate Judicial Attorneys Institute  October 27, 2010 Burlingame, CA

INITIAL REVIEW OF INITIAL REVIEW OF PRE-EXISTING TESTINGPRE-EXISTING TESTING

Page 64: 2010 Appellate Judicial Attorneys Institute  October 27, 2010 Burlingame, CA
Page 65: 2010 Appellate Judicial Attorneys Institute  October 27, 2010 Burlingame, CA

NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL PROFILE: JE

Page 66: 2010 Appellate Judicial Attorneys Institute  October 27, 2010 Burlingame, CA

ACQUISITION OF DOCUMENTSACQUISITION OF DOCUMENTS

Page 67: 2010 Appellate Judicial Attorneys Institute  October 27, 2010 Burlingame, CA

IDENTIFYING SUITABLE SOURCES IDENTIFYING SUITABLE SOURCES OF HISTORYOF HISTORY

Page 68: 2010 Appellate Judicial Attorneys Institute  October 27, 2010 Burlingame, CA

NEXUSNEXUS

Page 69: 2010 Appellate Judicial Attorneys Institute  October 27, 2010 Burlingame, CA

COST & COST & TIMETABLESTIMETABLES

Page 70: 2010 Appellate Judicial Attorneys Institute  October 27, 2010 Burlingame, CA

NEURORADIOLOGICAL DATA

Page 71: 2010 Appellate Judicial Attorneys Institute  October 27, 2010 Burlingame, CA

" NEUROIMAGING IS NEVER THE FIRST OPTION AND IT SHOULD ONLY

BE DONE ADVISEDLY."

APRIL 23, 2010HABEAS ASSISTANCE & TRAINING

COUNSEL PROJECTNATIONAL SEMINAR

SEATTLE, WA

JOHN BLUME:

Page 72: 2010 Appellate Judicial Attorneys Institute  October 27, 2010 Burlingame, CA

A PICTURE IS A PICTURE, NOT A PANACEA

Page 73: 2010 Appellate Judicial Attorneys Institute  October 27, 2010 Burlingame, CA
Page 74: 2010 Appellate Judicial Attorneys Institute  October 27, 2010 Burlingame, CA
Page 75: 2010 Appellate Judicial Attorneys Institute  October 27, 2010 Burlingame, CA
Page 76: 2010 Appellate Judicial Attorneys Institute  October 27, 2010 Burlingame, CA
Page 77: 2010 Appellate Judicial Attorneys Institute  October 27, 2010 Burlingame, CA
Page 78: 2010 Appellate Judicial Attorneys Institute  October 27, 2010 Burlingame, CA

NormalDefendant

DIFFUSION TENSOR IMAGING

Page 79: 2010 Appellate Judicial Attorneys Institute  October 27, 2010 Burlingame, CA

HOSKINS V. STATE702 So.2d 202 (Fla. 1997)

• Johnny Hoskins convicted of 1st degree murder and sentenced to death• Florida Supreme Court overturned trial court’s rejection of request for PET scan• Based on results of PET scan showing a brain abnormality, Supreme Court vacated death penalty in subsequent decision and ordered new sentencing proceeding• Hoskins ultimately resentenced to death; currently on death row

“Brain Scanning in the Courts: The Story So Far” Marchant G, J.D., Ph.D.,Orozco S., J.D. Candidate

Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law, Arizona2007

http://www.law.asu.edu/files/Centers_and_Programs/LST/Conferences_&_Events/brainscan/Marchant.pdf

Page 80: 2010 Appellate Judicial Attorneys Institute  October 27, 2010 Burlingame, CA

Juror:

"Well, I’ll be honest with you when we went in deliberation with that PET scan and all that computerized stuff they did, I said 'I felt like I’d been dazzled by brilliance and baffled with b.s. That’s how I felt.”

VERDICT: DEATH PENALTY

South Carolina v. Stanko(2006)

“Brain Scanning in the Courts: The Story So Far” Marchant G, J.D., Ph.D.,Orozco S., J.D. CandidateSandra Day O’Connor College of Law, Arizona2007http://www.law.asu.edu/files/Centers_and_Programs/LST/Conferences_&_Events/brainscan/Marchant.pdf

Page 81: 2010 Appellate Judicial Attorneys Institute  October 27, 2010 Burlingame, CA
Page 82: 2010 Appellate Judicial Attorneys Institute  October 27, 2010 Burlingame, CA

THE RIGHT TO DIAGNOSIS BY EXPERTS AND RELATED ISSUES

1. Castro v. Oklahoma, 71 F.3d 1502 (10th Cir. 1995), p. 10 (Court Appointed and publicly paid for).

2. Lambert v. Blodgett, 248 F.Supp.2d 988 (E.D. WA 2003) p. 9 (Duty to provide experts with meaningful information).

3. Silva v. Woodford, 279 F.3d 825 (9th Cir. 2002) p. 98 (Duty to investigate FAS for possible mitigation)

4. Rompilla v. Beard, 545 U.S. 374 (2005) (Duty to obtain prison, school, medical records, etc. that might reveal significant mitigating evidence and/or which would likely be relied on by the prosecutor for aggravation).

Page 83: 2010 Appellate Judicial Attorneys Institute  October 27, 2010 Burlingame, CA

5. Hicks v. Schofield, 599 S.E.2d 156 (GA 2004) (Expert could not definitively diagnose MR without examining defendant).

6. Stankewitz v. Woodford, 365 F.3rd 706 (9th Cir. 2004) p. 723 (The alleged mitigating facts, including “organic brain damage”, presumably a reference to FAS, constitute “the kind of troubled history the Supreme Court has declared relevant to assessing a defendant’s moral culpability.”)

Page 84: 2010 Appellate Judicial Attorneys Institute  October 27, 2010 Burlingame, CA

HOW THINGS GO WRONG

Page 85: 2010 Appellate Judicial Attorneys Institute  October 27, 2010 Burlingame, CA

HOW THINGS GO RIGHT

Page 86: 2010 Appellate Judicial Attorneys Institute  October 27, 2010 Burlingame, CA

SUMMARYSUMMARY

Page 87: 2010 Appellate Judicial Attorneys Institute  October 27, 2010 Burlingame, CA
Page 88: 2010 Appellate Judicial Attorneys Institute  October 27, 2010 Burlingame, CA

FASD EXPERTSCONTACT INFORMATION

www.FASDExperts.com

1700 Seventh Avenue, Suite 210Seattle, WA 98101

(206) 624-3800