2010-2011 amaos
DESCRIPTION
2010-2011 AMAOs. Scott W. Beaudry Testing Policy and Operations NC Department of Public Instruction. Today’s topics. AMAO Outcomes Definitions Timeline Tidbits Other reports Watchlist Title III Improvement Untested Questions. AMAO Outcomes - Definitions. AMAO 1 (Progress) - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
2010-2011 AMAOs
Scott W. Beaudry
Testing Policy and Operations
NC Department of Public Instruction
Today’s topics
• AMAO Outcomes– Definitions– Timeline– Tidbits
• Other reports– Watchlist– Title III Improvement– Untested
• Questions
AMAO Outcomes - Definitions
AMAO 1 (Progress)Definition: one or more of the following in terms of the
overall composite proficiency score on the annual English language proficiency test:
1) increase to the next English language proficiency level;
2) increase the previous score by 0.5; or
3) reach the Comprehensive Objective Composite (COC).
2010-2011 target: 55.1%
Changes since last year: redefined
AMAO Outcomes - Definitions
AMAO 2 (Proficiency)Definition: meet the Comprehensive Objective Composite
(COC) by reaching an overall composite score of 4.8 or above, with at least a 4.0 on the reading subtest and at least a 4.0 on the writing subtest on the state’s annual English language proficiency test for kindergarten and Tiers B or C in grades 1-12
2010-2011 target:12.4%
Changes since last year: none (year 2)
AMAO Outcomes - Definitions
AMAO 3 (AYP)Definition: Status on AMAO 3 is based on the performance
of the LEP subgroup (using the same decision rules used for AYP at the LEA level for Title I ) on four sub-targets (two subject areas at two grade spans). Performance on each subtarget is shown by functioning on two goals: Proficiency and 95% Participation
2010-2011 target: All subject/grade span/goal combinations “met”
Changes since last year: none
AMAO Outcomes - Timeline
Preliminary AMAO Outcomes Report sent to LEP Coordinators yesterday (9/14/2011)
LEAs have until 9/30 to review (2.5 weeks)
Final AMAO Outcomes Report presented to November SBE meeting
AMAO Outcomes - Tidbits
Tidbits (preliminary)– There were 90 Title III sub grantees– 105,507 K-13 students enrolled during
testing– 3,549 (3.4%) of those students do not have
test results (aka they are untested).
AMAO Outcomes - Tidbits
37 LEAs did not meet AMAO 1
6 LEAs did not meet AMAO 2
55 LEAs did not meet AMAO 3
66 LEAs did not meet the AMAOs*
*29 of these did not meet AMAO 3 only.
Other Reports
Title III Watchlist– Derived from the AMAO Outcomes report.– Only includes LEAs who met the AMAOs in
the previous year, but did not meet the AMAOs this year.
– A preliminary Watchlist will be sent out this week.
Other Reports cont’d
Title III Improvement– Derived from the AMAO Outcomes report
• Includes LEAs who did not meet the AMAOs for 2 or more years
• Is presented to the SBE
Other Reports cont’d
ACCESS Untested– A count of students enrolled during the
testing window who do not have ACCESS test scores; presented by LEA
– LEP staff factor these results into a risk-based analysis for monitoring
– LEP staff contact LEAs with unacceptably high percentages