2009 the financial crisis steinar holden Økonomisk institutt, uio econ 4325
TRANSCRIPT
2009
The Financial CrisisThe Financial Crisis
Steinar HoldenØkonomisk institutt, UiO
http://folk.uio.no/sholden/ECON 4325
2009
OutlineOutline
Macroeconomic imbalances Weaknesses in financial markets
Securitization Weaknesses in regulation What happened? Historical experiences Some lessons
2009
Predicted growth in world GDP, Predicted growth in world GDP, given at different points in time given at different points in time (IMF)(IMF)
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Verden Industriland Fremvoksende økonomier
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7Anslag oktoberAnslag novemberAnslag januar 2009Anslag mars 2009
2009
Background - macroeconomicsBackground - macroeconomics
Macroeconomic imbalancesHigh saving in China, Japan, Germany and oil exporting countries
High borrowing in the U.S, UK, Spain, etc
Fairly high economic growth at world level, yet low inflation partly due to cheap imports from low-cost countries
Central banks set low interest rates in 2002-2005
Economic growth and low interest ratesHigh growth in asset values”Search for yield”
2009
Boligpriser
Source: EcoWin, First Securities
86 88 90 92 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 08
25
50
75
100
125
150
175
200
225
250
275
25
50
75
100
125
150
175
200
225
250
275
Norge
Sverige
1999 = 100
Danmark
UK
USA
EMU
House pricesHouse prices
2009
Background – financial markets Background – financial markets
Extensive changes in financial markets last 20-30 years
Institutional changes (e.g. hedge funds, private equity funds)
Deregulation – removal of artificial barriersTechnology – increased access to information, communication, computer power, financial innovation
Strong profit motives and incentive based remuneration
AdvantagesEasier to borrow, better funding of investmentsBroader spectre of assets, diversification Increased efficiency and profitability
2009
SecuritizationSecuritization
Diversified portfolios formed on basis of mortgages, corporate bonds and other assets
Portfolios are sliced into tranches, sold to investors with different appetites for risk
Pension funds hold AAA rated assets due to restriction by charter
Hedge fund focus on more risky piecesBanks hold ”equity tranch” to ensure monitoring
But: most of risk stayed within banking sector (although spread across the world)
banks held leveraged AAA assets – tail risk
2009
Securitization – bad reasons
SupplyRegulatory arbitrage – Basel I required banks to hold capital of at least 8 percent of loans on balance sheets, but requirements were lower for SIVs (structured investment vehicles, i.e. off balance sheet entities created by banks)
Rating arbitrage – transfer assets to SIVs and issue AAA rated papers rather than A- rated papers
DemandNaiveté – risk underestimated due to past low correlation among regional housing markets
Search for yield – accept tail risk
2009
Subprime –mortgages in the USSubprime –mortgages in the US
Mortgages to household with weak financial background: NINJA – No Income, No Job or Assets
Often provided by agents paid on provision
Simplified credit evaluation
Often based on information from borrower
Teaser rates and ”piggyback” mortgages to avoid initial down payment
USA SubprimePercent of mortgages, stock
2009
Short term funding and leveraging (low equity shares)
Investors prefer assets with shorth maturity Provides liquidity Discipline device for banks
Most investment projects and mortgages have long maturities
Leads to ”maturity mismatch” for banks Increased reliance on extensive short-term
borrowing
Lower equity ratios to increase return on equity Earn 1 USD on loan of 100 USD 10 % equity => 10 % return on equity; 5 % equity => 20 % return on equity
2009
Rating agencies and credit default swaps CDS
AAA rating important for sale of CDOs Highly profitable business for rating
agencies Higher fees for structural products
Risk was underestimatedRating ”at the edge”, i.e. as ”risky as possible”
Insurance: Credit Default Swaps CDS Extensive reinsurance to other companies Insufficient capital – monoline insurers had
only 1 percent of amount at risk Possible to buy CDS without having
underlying asset
2009
Background – incentives in the Background – incentives in the financial sectorfinancial sector
Not only new, unknown risk, but alsoLow price on risk”Old, well known” risk, e.g. borrow in foreign currency
Incentive based remuneration, bonus for upside, but no punishment for downside
Measuring return relative to risk lead to search for other possibilities
Tail risk – win something 9 out of 10, loose a lot 1 out of 10
Herd behaviour – don’t do worse than others
2009
Background – weaknesses in Background – weaknesses in the regulationthe regulation
Large parts of financial markets without capital requirements and supervision
Half of the US credit market, including investment banks (because no depositors)
Holes in the regulation ”off-balance-sheet” Coordination problems and several regulatory authorities
Insufficient transparency Procyclical regulation
Good times: asset prices up => equity share up => lend more => asset prices up
Reverse in bad times
2009
15Kilde: Reuters EcoWin
House prices in the US, annual growth rates 1988 - 2008.
Årsvekst i 4. kvartal 2008 for 10 byområder: -19,2 prosent
Source: Reuters EcoWin
88 90 92 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 08
Pro
sent
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20
Case-Shiller nasjonal indeks
Case-Shiller indeks for 10 byområder
2009Difference 3-month money market Difference 3-month money market
rates and policy ratesrates and policy rates1. januar 2008 – 2. februar 2009. Prosentpoeng1. januar 2008 – 2. februar 2009. Prosentpoeng
Kilde: Reuters EcoWin
USA
EurosonenNorge
-0,5
0,0
0,5
1,0
1,5
2,0
2,5
3,0
3,5
jan. 08 apr. 08 jul. 08 okt. 08 jan. 09
Prosentpoeng
2009
Amplification mechanismsAmplification mechanisms
Loss on bad loans, and fear of new losses
Liquidity crisis Banks more reluctant to lend to other banksDifficult to obtain short term fundingBanks must sell assets => asset prices fallLower asset prices increase loss => sell moreAsset markets become illiquid
Solvency problemsDowngrading of securities and institutionsProcyclical behaviour and regulation
2009
The financial crisis leads to a The financial crisis leads to a recessionrecession
Financial crisis leads to lower investment and lower consumption, so that GDP falls
Demand fallsRisk increasesMore difficult to finance investment projects, consumption and trade credits
Investments, cars, durables, manufacturing products severly hit
Recession involves real losses that amplifies financial crisis
Banks take losses, and must reduce lendingFirms have lower equity and lower sales, more uncertainty, becomes less credit worthy
2009
Historical experiences of Historical experiences of financial crises after 1945financial crises after 1945Reinhart og Rogoff, NBERReinhart og Rogoff, NBER
Average change from top to bottom Longlasting reduction in asset prices
House prices fall by 35 percent over six yearsStock prices fall by 55 percent over 3 ½ years
Fall in output and employmentUnemployment increases by 7 percent over four years
GDP falls by 9 percent over two years Public debt increases
Average increase is 86 percent (not a good measure, as it depends on initial debt)
2009
Some lessons for the regulation Some lessons for the regulation of financial marketsof financial markets
Supervision and regulation of all activity which involves system risk
Better information and transparency Make regulation less procyclical
Raw leverage caps, not only risk adjusted More emphasis on stability and less on
competition Market discipline must improve
Credit rating agencies Insentives in financial institutions
Liquidity regulation and better liquidity provision