2009-2010 bill 55: supreme court - south carolina ...  · web viewdocument path:...

3
South Carolina General Assembly 118th Session, 2009-2010 S. 55 STATUS INFORMATION Joint Resolution Sponsors: Senators Ford and Elliott Document Path: l:\council\bills\ms\7046ahb09.docx Companion/Similar bill(s): 63 Introduced in the Senate on January 13, 2009 Currently residing in the Senate Committee on Judiciary Summary: Supreme Court HISTORY OF LEGISLATIVE ACTIONS Date Body Action Description with journal page number 12/10/2008 Senate Prefiled 12/10/2008 Senate Referred to Committee on Judiciary 1/13/2009 Senate Introduced and read first time SJ -97 1/13/2009 Senate Referred to Committee on Judiciary SJ -97 VERSIONS OF THIS BILL 12/10/2008 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31

Upload: others

Post on 13-Jun-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 2009-2010 Bill 55: Supreme Court - South Carolina ...  · Web viewDocument Path: l:\council\bills\ms\7046ahb09.docx. Companion/Similar bill(s): 63. Introduced in the Senate on January

South Carolina General Assembly118th Session, 2009-2010

S. 55

STATUS INFORMATION

Joint ResolutionSponsors: Senators Ford and ElliottDocument Path: l:\council\bills\ms\7046ahb09.docxCompanion/Similar bill(s): 63

Introduced in the Senate on January 13, 2009Currently residing in the Senate Committee on Judiciary

Summary: Supreme Court

HISTORY OF LEGISLATIVE ACTIONS

Date Body Action Description with journal page number 12/10/2008 Senate Prefiled12/10/2008 Senate Referred to Committee on Judiciary1/13/2009 Senate Introduced and read first time SJ-971/13/2009 Senate Referred to Committee on Judiciary SJ-97

VERSIONS OF THIS BILL

12/10/2008

123456789

10111213141516171819202122232425262728293031

Page 2: 2009-2010 Bill 55: Supreme Court - South Carolina ...  · Web viewDocument Path: l:\council\bills\ms\7046ahb09.docx. Companion/Similar bill(s): 63. Introduced in the Senate on January

A JOINT RESOLUTION

PROPOSING AN AMENDMENT TO SECTION 2, ARTICLE V OF THE CONSTITUTION OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1895, RELATING TO THE COMPOSITION OF THE SUPREME COURT, SO AS TO INCREASE FROM FIVE TO SEVEN THE NUMBER OF JUSTICES COMPRISING THE SUPREME COURT ON JANUARY 1, 2011.

Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of South Carolina:

SECTION 1. It is proposed that Section 2, Article V of the Constitution of this State be amended to read:

“Section 2. The On January 1, 2011, the Supreme Court shall consist of a Chief Justice and four six Associate Justices, any three four of whom shall constitute constitutes a quorum for the transaction of business. The Chief Justice shall preside, and in his absence the senior Associate Justice shall preside. In all cases decided by the Supreme Court, the concurrence of three four of the Justices shall be is necessary for a reversal of the judgment below.”

SECTION 2. The proposed amendment must be submitted to the qualified electors at the next general election for representatives. Ballots must be provided at the various voting precincts with the following words printed or written on the ballot:

“Must Section 2, Article V of the Constitution of this State be amended so as to increase the composition of the Supreme Court from five to seven justices effective on January 1, 2011?

[55] 1

123456789

101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142

Page 3: 2009-2010 Bill 55: Supreme Court - South Carolina ...  · Web viewDocument Path: l:\council\bills\ms\7046ahb09.docx. Companion/Similar bill(s): 63. Introduced in the Senate on January

Yes

No

Those voting in favor of the question shall deposit a ballot with a check or cross mark in the square after the word ‘Yes’, and those voting against the question shall deposit a ballot with a check or cross mark in the square after the word ‘No’.”

----XX----

[55] 2

123456789