africa · 2009-03-18 · fmd technical workshop for africa 2. questionnaire q1 –current status...
TRANSCRIPT
FM
D T
ech
nic
al
Wo
rksh
op
fo
rAfrica
FMD Technical Workshop for AfricaContributing to the FMD Global Strategy
Nairobi 26-30 January 2009
Country Survey – Preliminary Results
FM
D T
ech
nic
al
Wo
rksh
op
fo
rAfrica
1. Objectives of the survey
� To assess the level of FMD risk management in Africa
(for countries non officially free of FMD)
� To obtain baseline information for
– regional* and global advocacy
– the development of the Global FMD Strategy
(national and regional* dimensions)
� To start sensibilizing countries on the Issue
� Not to ‘rank’ countries
*Already used for Middle-east countries; Planned for Asian countries
FM
D T
ech
nic
al
Wo
rksh
op
fo
rAfrica
2. Questionnaire
� Q1 – Current status (with regard to progressive
control stages 0 � 5)
� Q2 – Actions needed to move to the next 1 and 2
stages, and difficulties to solve
� Q3 – Time needed to move to the next 1 and 2
stages
� Q4 – Kind of international assistance needed
FM
D T
ech
nic
al
Wo
rksh
op
fo
rAfrica
3. Process
� Use of the tool developed by FAO (part of the
progressive FMD risk reduction approach; see
previous presentation) � level 0 to 5
� Questionnaire (4 questions)
� Launched on January 7; reply deadline on January 19
� Survey via the CVOs
� Legend used:
No response
Other
Level 0
ZoneNational
Level 5
Level 4
Level 3
Level 2
Level 1
FM
D T
ech
nic
al
Wo
rksh
op
fo
rAfrica
4. Response rate
� 56 survey forms sent (all African countries including
Mayotte and La Réunion; 2 countries non OIE
member = Liberia and Seychelles)
� 29 responses
� 2 countries (who had not responded) with OIE official status
(Mauritius; South Africa)
� Response rate = 55%
� Questionnaires retournés vierge (1), incomplets (5)
FM
D T
ech
nic
al
Wo
rksh
op
fo
rAfrica
5. Results Q1 – Current status
FM
D T
ech
nic
al
Wo
rksh
op
fo
rAfrica
5. Results Q1 – Current status
No response
Other
Level 0
ZN
Level 5
Level 4
Level 3
Level 2
Level 1
FM
D T
ech
nic
al
Wo
rksh
op
fo
rAfrica
5. Results Q1 – Current status
� Insufficient data (in particular for central and eastern
Africa)
� ‘Sub-regional level’ (North Africa = 3; West Africa = 0;
South Africa = >2)
� Wide range of responses, including ‘zoned countries’
� Countries difficult to range:
– Lesotho, Rwanda: no occurrence since many years
(while no circulation study or surveillance)
– Seychelles: level 5 (but not an OIE member
country)
FM
D T
ech
nic
al
Wo
rksh
op
fo
rAfrica
6. Results Q2 – Actions needed
/ difficulties for the next steps
� Countries at level 0
FMD surveillance (passive and active) in place
(stakeholders trained; functional nat. epid.
network)
Contingency plans existing and implemented
Cross border collaboration; movement control
Quality vaccines available / affordable
(Mass - strategic) vaccination implemented
Vaccines R&D in place
Outbreaks declared to OIE
Diagnostic kits / reagents available
Lab staff trained
Seroprevalence / virus identification
studies conducted
Risk analysis conducted
Strategic vaccination studied
Breeders sensibilized
Actions
needed
Lack of resources: financial, HR, logistical (facilities)
Lack of knowledge, information, awareness
Legislation inadequate
Lack of cross-border, sub-regional, regional coordination (notably for transhumant countries)
Difficulties
4. Level of virus circulation studied repeatedly
5. Outbreaks investigation, sources identified
6. Risk identified for each chain, adapted strategies implemented
7. Impact of control measures assessed
1. Level of virus circulation studied
2. Critical risk points identified
3. Strategy under development
Required activities
Passage to Level 2Passage to Level 1
FM
D T
ech
nic
al
Wo
rksh
op
fo
rAfrica
6. Results Q2 – Actions needed
/ difficulties for the next steps
� Countries at level 3
- Identification / traceability of all sensible
species
- Control of animal movement
- Respect of biosecurity measures
- FMD status in the sub-region
- Availability of Funds
- Expertise and funds for the ‘Dossier OIE’
Surveillance program maintained, reinforced
Dossier ‘OIE’ (free without vaccination status)
prepared and submitted to OIE
Surveillance program maintained, reinforced
Dossier ‘OIE’ (free with vaccination status)
prepared and submitted to OIE
Actions
needed
- Resources (HR, material, logistic) to carry out
proper surveillance
- Expertise and funds for the ‘Dossier OIE’
Difficulties
5. No outbreak of FMD for the past 2 years and no evidence
of FMDV circulation for the past 12 months,
6. Surveillance for FMD and FMDV circulation in accordance
with the OIE Code is in operation; regulatory measures
for the prevention and control of FMD have been
implemented (documented evidence)
7. Vaccination is not carried out
1. No outbreak of FMD for the past 2 years and no evidence of
FMDV circulation for the past 12 months,
2. Surveillance for FMD and FMDV circulation in accordance with
the OIE Code is in operation; regulatory measures for the
prevention and control of FMD have been implemented
(documented evidence)
3. Routine vaccination is carried out for the purpose of the
prevention of FMD (documented evidence)
4. Vaccine used complies with the standards described in the
Terrestrial Manual (documented evidence)
Required activities
Passage to Level 5Passage to Level 4
FM
D T
ech
nic
al
Wo
rksh
op
fo
rAfrica
6. Results Q2 – Actions needed
/ difficulties for the next steps
� Specific issues for ‘zoned countries’
Surveillance improve, notably in wildlife
Livestock movements controlled
Livestock identified
Country subdivided into smaller zones
Actions needed
- Links with wildlife authorities, and surveillance strengthening in parks
- Establishment of check points; additional mobile patrols
- Extensive / communal grazing systems, with infrastructures like watering points,
dip tanks, improved pasture and marketing
- Fences, demarcation issues
- Overall: funding issues
Difficulties
Passage to the next Level
FM
D T
ech
nic
al
Wo
rksh
op
fo
rAfrica
7. Results Q3 –
Next 2 levels chronogram
FM
D T
ech
nic
al
Wo
rksh
op
fo
rAfrica2010 2011
2012 2013- 2014
7. Results Q3 –
Next 2 levels chronogram
2009
FM
D T
ech
nic
al
Wo
rksh
op
fo
rAfrica
� Not all the countries have provided chronogram
(Togo; Ivory Coast; Burundi...)
� Result show that next level is reachable:
� In 1 year for 66%
� In 3 to 4 years for
33%
� In 1 year for 100%� in 1 year for 36%
� in 1 to 2 year for 7%
� in 2 years for 42%
� in 3 and more years
for 14%
For countries
at level 3 (N or Z)
For countries
at level 2
For countries
at level 0
7. Results Q3 –
Next 2 levels chronogram
FM
D T
ech
nic
al
Wo
rksh
op
fo
rAfrica
8. Results Q4 –
International assistance
Specific support
� Epidemiology ++
� Preparedness + +
� Labs capacities + + +
� Surveillance capacities + + +
� Control capacities + +
� Vaccines + +
� Socio-economic studies + +
� OIE ‘dossier’ + +
� Regional approach / program + +
Accompanying measures
� VS strengthening (OIE PVS)
+
� Public awareness +
� Livestock chains
structuration / organization
+
� Identification / traceability
animals +
� Funding + +
+ mentioned [1 time]; + + mentioned [2; 5 times]; + + + mentioned [6; 10 times]
FM
D T
ech
nic
al
Wo
rksh
op
fo
rAfrica
8. Results Q4 –
International assistance
Specific support requested (1/2)
� Epidemiology
– Epidemiological national surveys / serotype identification + +
– Epidemiology training +
� Preparedness
– Emergency preparedness +
– Contingency plan +
– Legislation actualization and harmonization: +
– Experts advices: +
� Surveillance capacities
– Surveillance CB: +++ (including stakeholders disease reporting ++)
� Labs capacities
– Provision of material: reagent ++; testing kits ++; sampling material +
– Diagnostic CB: +++
– Overall lab CB: ++
FM
D T
ech
nic
al
Wo
rksh
op
fo
rAfrica
8. Results Q4 –
International assistance
Specific support requested (2/2)� Control capacities
– Emergency support (in case of outbreaks): ++
� Vaccines– Vaccines provision ++
– Vaccination program ++
– Vaccines development and production: +
� Socio-economic studies– Global +, regional + and national ++ impact of the disease
– Import risk analysis +
– Risk analysis for each livestock chain +
� OIE ‘dossier’– ‘dossier’ information + ; ‘Dossier’ preparation + ; ‘Dossier’ funding +
� Zoning
– creating free zones +
� Regional approach / program + + (notably Sahelian countries)
FM
D T
ech
nic
al
Wo
rksh
op
fo
rAfrica
9. Conclusions
� Limits of the questionnaire (to be refined)
� Preliminary results (to be continued)
� Sub-regional / regional approach strongly
emphasized
� So far, 3 different levels (North = 3, West = 0, South=
>2)
� 3 roadmaps?
� 3 strategies?
� 3 levels of assistance from the international
community?