200803 loma conference - creating a call center
DESCRIPTION
Case study presented with participating carrier on the process involved in creating a highly effective call center delivering competitively differentiating service.TRANSCRIPT
Creating a Call Center:A Straightforward Approach
Presented by:
Kirsten KaczorServices Team Manager
American Family Life Insurance Company
March 2008
LOMA Customer Service Conference
Steve CallahanPractice Development DirectorThe Robert E. Nolan Company
© Robert E. Nolan Company, Inc. www.renolan.com |
LOMA Customer Service ConferenceMarch 2008 Page 2
Session Overview
§ Why Call Centers as a Focus– Critical customer touchpoint, the face of the company– Issues with service impacting competitive differentiation
§ Developing a Call Center Strategy– Basic mechanics of Call Centers– A proposed solution for addressing mixed service centers
§ American Family Insurance Case Study– Designed and implemented a call center operation using
existing skills, technologies and resources in under 12 weeks
– Real example of how companies can consolidate, organize, and develop efficient and effective call center service functions.
© Robert E. Nolan Company, Inc. www.renolan.com |
LOMA Customer Service ConferenceMarch 2008 Page 3
Why Call Centers as a Focus
Steve CallahanPractice Development DirectorThe Robert E. Nolan Company
© Robert E. Nolan Company, Inc. www.renolan.com |
LOMA Customer Service ConferenceMarch 2008 Page 4
Why Call Centers?
§ Competition creating increased pressure on margins§ Distribution channel competitiveness and instability§ Product commoditization drives service differentiation
Call centers are the “front line”the customer facing contact point
A crowded insurance marketplace means that consumers who are not satisfied with a carrier's quality of service can find viable options elsewhere. As a result, more and more insurers are making concerted efforts to improve their customer service. "At the end of the day, if youdon't satisfy your clients, they're not going to stay your clients,“
says Jeffrey Stoll, SVP and CIO of the Individual Business and Customer Response CenterMetLife.
© Robert E. Nolan Company, Inc. www.renolan.com |
LOMA Customer Service ConferenceMarch 2008 Page 5
Of 6 industries measured by ACSI Call Center Customer Satisfaction Index, the insurance industry is on the low end
Compared to Banking (77) and Retail (80), Insurance call centers (68) need improvement!
And Satisfaction With Call Centers is Sub-par
© Robert E. Nolan Company, Inc. www.renolan.com |
LOMA Customer Service ConferenceMarch 2008 Page 6
Yet Attention and Investment Makes a Difference
Call Resolution is the Key to Satisfaction (J.D. Powers Survey)§ 73% with issues resolved awarded satisfaction score of 80§ 22% with unresolved issues awarded satisfaction score of 29
MetLife recently invested in its call centers, and…customer satisfaction score jumped by nearly 10 percent
The technology involves agile, Web-based services that§ Allows tracking calls and keeping case history§ Accesses various systems through a single desktop.§ Reduces the time on the phone§ Improves customer experience
© Robert E. Nolan Company, Inc. www.renolan.com |
LOMA Customer Service ConferenceMarch 2008 Page 7
Challenge: Balancing Efficiency and Effectiveness
(Customer Value)
(Costs)
© Robert E. Nolan Company, Inc. www.renolan.com |
LOMA Customer Service ConferenceMarch 2008 Page 8
While Contact Complexity and Diversity Grows
© Robert E. Nolan Company, Inc. www.renolan.com |
LOMA Customer Service ConferenceMarch 2008 Page 9
And Outsourcing Falls From Favor…Making Insourcing a Need
57% Opposed to Voice Offshore19% Okay with Voice Offshore24% Uncertain
© Robert E. Nolan Company, Inc. www.renolan.com |
LOMA Customer Service ConferenceMarch 2008 Page 10
Complicated by High Multi-lingual Demand
Significant growth trends in Hispanic and Asian Markets requireattention to multi-lingual services to meet customer needs
© Robert E. Nolan Company, Inc. www.renolan.com |
LOMA Customer Service ConferenceMarch 2008 Page 11
Making Demands for Call Center Improvement High
From 7.7 (Improving First Call Resolution) to 9.6 (Decreasing Costs), with a midpoint of
8.5 (Improving Customer Satisfaction)
Ranking of Importance of Call Center Goals
© Robert E. Nolan Company, Inc. www.renolan.com |
LOMA Customer Service ConferenceMarch 2008 Page 12
Profiling People and Process as Priorities
48%
10%
© Robert E. Nolan Company, Inc. www.renolan.com |
LOMA Customer Service ConferenceMarch 2008 Page 13
While Attrition Remains a Huge Issue
82% rank a prioritythe 42% attrition
Given 15% endup at competitors
© Robert E. Nolan Company, Inc. www.renolan.com |
LOMA Customer Service ConferenceMarch 2008 Page 14
Developing A Call Center Strategy
Steve CallahanPractice Development DirectorThe Robert E. Nolan Company
© Robert E. Nolan Company, Inc. www.renolan.com |
LOMA Customer Service ConferenceMarch 2008 Page 15
Call Volumes Fluctuate Throughout the Day
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
8:00 8:30 9:00 9:30 10:00 10:30 11:00 11:30 12:00 12:30 13:00 13:30 14:00 14:30 15:00 15:30 16:00 16:30 17:00 17:30
Mon Tues Wed Thurs Fri
0 Widely fluctuating volumes and staff needs0 Must be handled in real-time – no backlogs
© Robert E. Nolan Company, Inc. www.renolan.com |
LOMA Customer Service ConferenceMarch 2008 Page 16
Calls Even Fluctuate Intrahour(The impact is that breaks, lunches, time away from desk critical)
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
10:00
10:02
10:04
10:06
10:08
10:10
10:12
10:14
10:16
10:18
10:20
10:22
10:24
10:26
10:28
10:30
© Robert E. Nolan Company, Inc. www.renolan.com |
LOMA Customer Service ConferenceMarch 2008 Page 17
© Robert E. Nolan Company, Inc. www.renolan.com |
LOMA Customer Service ConferenceMarch 2008 Page 18
Customer and Agent Experience Also Widely Varies
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
8:00 8:30 9:00 9:30 10:00 10:30 11:00 11:30 12:00 12:30 13:00 13:30 14:00 14:30 15:00 15:30 16:00 16:30 17:00 17:30
0 Expensive service delivered by bored agents
0 Believe it or not, quality is lower
Level Staffing
0 Poor service delivered by highly stressed agents
Understaffed
Overstaffed
© Robert E. Nolan Company, Inc. www.renolan.com |
LOMA Customer Service ConferenceMarch 2008 Page 19
Typical Service Center Organization Design 1:Consolidated Calls and Transactions
Calls & Transactions0 Policy Owner Service0 New Business0 Claims
0 Policy Owners0 Agents and Brokers
0 Providers
Customer / Policyholder Service(Line of Business / Channel / Region)
© Robert E. Nolan Company, Inc. www.renolan.com |
LOMA Customer Service ConferenceMarch 2008 Page 20
Transactions0 New Business
0Policy Owner Service0 Claims
BillingPhone Calls
0 Policy Owners0 Agents/Brokers0 Providers
Processing Center(s)Multiple Call Centers
(Line of Business / Channel / Region)
Typical Service Center Organization Design 2:Separate Call Centers from Transactions
ClaimsPhone Calls
0 Policy Owners0 Agents/Brokers0 Providers
AgencyPhone Calls
0 Policy Owners0 Agents/Brokers0 Providers
© Robert E. Nolan Company, Inc. www.renolan.com |
LOMA Customer Service ConferenceMarch 2008 Page 21
Service Center Staffing DynamicsPhone Calls§ Widely fluctuating volumes and staff needs§ Handle peaks in real time§ Overtime not an option
§ Requires sophisticated staffing/modeling tools§ Need is immediate and unscheduled
Transaction Processing§ Mildly fluctuating volumes and staff needs§ Handle peaks with overtime§ OK to build small backlogs
§ Traditional staffing models work well§ Need can be scheduled and is not immediate
© Robert E. Nolan Company, Inc. www.renolan.com |
LOMA Customer Service ConferenceMarch 2008 Page 22
Improvement Opportunity
§ Widely fluctuating– Volumes– Staffing needs
§ Peaks in real time§ No Backlogs§ WFM 101
§ Mildly fluctuating– Volumes– Staffing
§ Peaks in overtime§ Backlogs okay§ Staffing models
§ Blended work basket§ Shared resources§ Sophisticated
– Management practices– Modeling tools– Staffing tools
+
Requires a new strategy
Maximize Resource Utilization
100% Calls100% Transactions
© Robert E. Nolan Company, Inc. www.renolan.com |
LOMA Customer Service ConferenceMarch 2008 Page 23
The Service Center Improvement Opportunity
Consolidated Call Center
Shared Resources
Goal:
Maximize Resource Utilization and Effectiveness
Processing Center(s)POOLED
RESOURCES –SHAREDTASKS
© Robert E. Nolan Company, Inc. www.renolan.com |
LOMA Customer Service ConferenceMarch 2008 Page 24
The Service Center Objective
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
8:00 8:30 9:00 9:30 10:00 10:30 11:00 11:30 12:00 12:30 13:00 13:30 14:00 14:30 15:00 15:30 16:00 16:30 17:00 17:30
Total Staff Call Staff Needed
Call Staffing Need
Transaction Capacity20 phone / 50 processing
50 phone / 20 processing
Short cycle transactions fill downtime for center staffStaffing at level that builds in peak time excess
© Robert E. Nolan Company, Inc. www.renolan.com |
LOMA Customer Service ConferenceMarch 2008 Page 25
1. Forecast incoming calls§ By day § In 30 minute increments
2. Convert to staff need§ Call handle time, service levels§ Schedule adherence
3. Develop work schedule§ Start, stop times§ Breaks, lunch, PTO§ Backup coverage
4. Allocate filler work§ Short duration transactions§ Simple, once and done
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
8:00 8:30 9:00 9:30 10:00 10:30 11:00 11:30 12:00 12:30 13:00 13:30 14:00 14:30 15:00 15:30 16:00 16:30 17:00 17:30
Staff Available Calls Staff Need
Match Schedules to Call Arrival Patterns
Goal is consistent customer and agent experience
© Robert E. Nolan Company, Inc. www.renolan.com |
LOMA Customer Service ConferenceMarch 2008 Page 26
Optimizing Service Center Performance
Optimal performance from integration of non-phone tasks§ Letters, emails, faxes, other transactions, and calls requiring research§ Work is difficult to handle between calls effectively, yet must be handled
Three techniques to create balance, better utilize capacity1. Give phone staff quiet time off the phone every day§ Use slow times to reallocate staff to other work, be sure to track productivity§ Transaction productivity greatly increased by uninterrupted blocks of time
2. Treat transaction timeliness the same as call service levels§ Slow handling drives up phone calls creating spiral of lost productivity§ Use task goals similar to calls, e.g. 80% in 2 days; keep all in balance
3. Monitor percent pended phone calls (first call resolutions)§ Identify who has most callbacks and what the most common reasons are§ Training needs? Performance issue? Forms issue? Unclear policies?§ Track call back / pending return call inventories by person
© Robert E. Nolan Company, Inc. www.renolan.com |
LOMA Customer Service ConferenceMarch 2008 Page 27
Impact of Service Center Approach
Net Productivity Increase
24%
17%
21%
18%
37%
22%
Dept 1
Dept 2
Dept 3
Dept 4
Dept 5
Overall
© Robert E. Nolan Company, Inc. www.renolan.com |
LOMA Customer Service ConferenceMarch 2008 Page 28
American Family’s Challenge of Growth
Kirsten KaczorServices Team Manager
American Family Life Insurance Company
© Robert E. Nolan Company, Inc. www.renolan.com |
LOMA Customer Service ConferenceMarch 2008 Page 29
Outline§ American Family Insurance Company
– Staffing/ Structure– Challenges
§ “Old World” – Previous State– Metrics– Inefficiencies
§ Contact Center– Identify the Gaps– Implementation– Staffing
§ “New World” - Current State– Results/ Efficiencies– Measurement Tools
§ Future Enhancements
© Robert E. Nolan Company, Inc. www.renolan.com |
LOMA Customer Service ConferenceMarch 2008 Page 30
American Family Overview
§ Large, multi-state, mutual insurance company
§ Top-twenty multi-line insurer based in Madison, WI § Serves personal, commercial, and specialty markets§ Products distributed through dedicated career agents§ Long history of customer focus and service quality § Concentrated on serving America’s Middle Market
§ Major property-casualty distributor § Good mix of life, health, and annuity lines
© Robert E. Nolan Company, Inc. www.renolan.com |
LOMA Customer Service ConferenceMarch 2008 Page 31
Organizational Staffing and Structure
§ Inforce staff supported all service needs including phone calls, customer requests, and agent requests by blended teams doing the same work
§ Phone calls were answered by all staff in both teams based on a rotating schedule, and included doing the transaction work at the same time
§ Stress levels were high and quality mediocre due to the breadth of knowledge required
© Robert E. Nolan Company, Inc. www.renolan.com |
LOMA Customer Service ConferenceMarch 2008 Page 32
American Family’s Challenge
§ Rapid growth in sales created inforce service backlogs
§ Agents striving for year end goals in time of growth
§ Service times need to improve 20% to be competitive
§ Pending inventory had to be reduced “significantly”
§ Wide swings – over 250% - in service time variances
© Robert E. Nolan Company, Inc. www.renolan.com |
LOMA Customer Service ConferenceMarch 2008 Page 33
“Old World”
Cloudy, Not Well Defined
© Robert E. Nolan Company, Inc. www.renolan.com |
LOMA Customer Service ConferenceMarch 2008 Page 34
Starting Transaction Service Levels2005 Loan/Surrender Tasks Production Turnaround Time
See Definition Tab for explanation of time measurement for each Task
33
33
4
2
4
3
4
3
4
3
111 1 1
1
2
1 11
12
4
10
19
17
97
10
7
4
8
11
6
9
6
9
8
5
10
77
9
3 3
7
0
5
10
15
20
Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan
Num
ber
of D
ays
to P
roce
ss Dividend Request
Loan Request
Surrenders
Partial Surrenders
2005 Billing Tasks Production Turnaround Time
See Definition Tab for explanation of time measurement for each Task
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4
7
4
9
654
7
2
7
4
9
5
8
2
7
11
5
9
8
67
9
6
000
10
8
11
54
19
9
10
24
11
14
10 11
16
14
11 11
15
1414
1515 14
13
0
5
10
15
20
25
Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan
Num
ber
of D
ays
to P
roce
ss
AFT/Bank Change
Bouncers
Mode Chng toAmplan
Premium Processing
Reinstatements
Wide fluctuations in service timesNo consistency in serviceBuilding backlog of transactions
Randomly arriving callsCalls impact transaction servicingTransactions impact call services
© Robert E. Nolan Company, Inc. www.renolan.com |
LOMA Customer Service ConferenceMarch 2008 Page 35
American Family Service Center Organization:Consolidated Calls and Transactions
Calls & Transactions0 Policy Owner Service0 New Business0Policy Owners
0 Agents and Brokers
Customer / Policyholder Service(Two Teams Doing Blend of Calls and Transactions)
Calls & Transactions0 Policy Owner Service0 New Business0Policy Owners
0 Agents and Brokers
© Robert E. Nolan Company, Inc. www.renolan.com |
LOMA Customer Service ConferenceMarch 2008 Page 36
Current Operating Inefficiencies
§ Two teams duplicating efforts– Managers– Staff
§ Phone calls causing interruptions
§ Lack of time to find efficiencies– Processing work– Handling calls
§ Lack of “Experts”
© Robert E. Nolan Company, Inc. www.renolan.com |
LOMA Customer Service ConferenceMarch 2008 Page 37
Establishing a Service Center
§ Separated work from phone calls to improve efficiencies
§ Identified best qualified staff for each area– Took strongest processors, assigned to the work areas
§ Tasks staffed appropriately and phones got the rest – Staff were not asked for their preference
§ Needed to create a different culture– More accountability, adherence to schedules– Needed metrics to measure success and areas for improvement
© Robert E. Nolan Company, Inc. www.renolan.com |
LOMA Customer Service ConferenceMarch 2008 Page 38
The Contact Center Improvement Opportunity
Consolidated Call CenterAgent CallsClient Calls
Problem ResearchAgent Emails
VoicemailsCallbacks
Shared Resources
Processing Center
Complex ChangesCancellations
Premium BillingConversionsSurrenders
LoansIllustrationsAgent ChgsAddress ChgsBeneficiaryDividends
Shared Tasks
© Robert E. Nolan Company, Inc. www.renolan.com |
LOMA Customer Service ConferenceMarch 2008 Page 39
Implementation of a Contact Center§ Coverage is 7 to 7
– Team members choose their schedule – Late shifts signed up for as staffing needs are determined
§ To improve coverage we allow a 4 day work week§ Call audits are used to determine call quality
– All incoming calls are recorded and are randomly audited– Goal is 3% of the calls or 300 a month whichever is less – Our follow-up time is 60 seconds
§ Piloted for 10 months then formal restructuring– Pilot allowed fine tuning staff levels, workflows, reporting
§ Blended simple tasks with phone unit to optimize staff– Added 33% to call center staff level to allow for blended tasks– Loans, dividends, agent changes, illustrations – Fewer steps, require involvement in fewer systems, no research– Also included email boxes and voicemailboxes
© Robert E. Nolan Company, Inc. www.renolan.com |
LOMA Customer Service ConferenceMarch 2008 Page 40
Implementation of a Contact Center
§ Created productivity measures to emphasize phones– Initially based on average timings, calculated time at work, less
project time, less time off, plus overtime to get productivity– How much time at work, less projects, less time off, of remaining
time how much logged in to take calls for adherence – Opted for monitoring what percentage of time team members
were available for phone calls to get adherence
§ For productivity, run reports to get actual talk time– Subtract talk time from productive work time, then use remaining
time to determine how much task work was done using the timings, from that calculate productivity based on non-call time
§ Service goal is 80% in 30 seconds, under 5% abandons
© Robert E. Nolan Company, Inc. www.renolan.com |
LOMA Customer Service ConferenceMarch 2008 Page 41
“New World”
Clear, Well Defined
© Robert E. Nolan Company, Inc. www.renolan.com |
LOMA Customer Service ConferenceMarch 2008 Page 42
Comparison of Total Transaction Inventory
Oct 4th to Dec 4th Comparison
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
AdvancedChanges
AFT & BlockBilling
Conversion &Repl
GeneralChanges
Loans &Dividends
PremiumProcessing
Reinstatements Surrenders
Transaction Types
Tota
l Inv
ento
ry
10/4/2005 12/4/2005
Total Servicing Queues Inventory Dropped 60%
© Robert E. Nolan Company, Inc. www.renolan.com |
LOMA Customer Service ConferenceMarch 2008 Page 43
Comparison of Transaction Cycle TimesTotal Cycle Times Reduced by 25% to 72%
Cycle Time Improvements
0.00
5.00
10.00
15.00
AFT/ Bank Change Premium Processing Reinst at es Loan Request s Surrenders
Day
s
Oct-05 Dec-05
© Robert E. Nolan Company, Inc. www.renolan.com |
LOMA Customer Service ConferenceMarch 2008 Page 44
Common Call Center Service Goals
The three most common measures in use today are:§ ASA – Average Speed of Answer§ Abandon Rate – Percentage of callers who hang up before being served§ Service Level – x% of Calls Answered in Y seconds
ASA ignores abandons, can mislead over longer periods§ Focus on ASA alternates between poor service by overstressed agents
and great service by unproductive agents§ Measuring ASA results in wide swings of service that average out at an
acceptable level but have periods of totally unacceptable service
Abandon rate tells you nothing about vast majority of calls§ Abandon rate fairly uncontrollable, typically a symptom of other issues§ Tracking should eliminate “short abandons” – those in the first 10 seconds
© Robert E. Nolan Company, Inc. www.renolan.com |
LOMA Customer Service ConferenceMarch 2008 Page 45
Call Volumes and Abandon RatesOver 28,850 calls received from Nov 9th through Dec 30th
§ Average talk time per call just under 3 minutes§ Average Abandon Rate 5.6%
Phone Performance
0200400600800
10001200
Date
Volu
me
0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%
% A
band
oned
Call Volume Abandon Rate
1 32
© Robert E. Nolan Company, Inc. www.renolan.com |
LOMA Customer Service ConferenceMarch 2008 Page 46
Contact Center Performance
14,868
17,783
15,431
18,155
16,834
16,087
15,028
15,948
16,362
13,996
18,190
16,014
15,128
2.10% 1.81% 2.95% 3.40% 3.23% 2.49% 3.48% 3.13% 3.30%5.34% 3.90% 3.81%
88.45%
79.20%77.14% 78.44%
85.37%
78.67% 78.43%
74.01%71.33% 71.85%
4.35%
87.48%
79.00%
64.44%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Dec-06 Jan-07 Feb-07 Mar-07 Apr-07 May-07 Jun-07 Jul-07 Aug-07 Sep-07 Oct-07 Nov-07 Dec-0710,000
11,000
12,000
13,000
14,000
15,000
16,000
17,000
18,000
19,000
20,000
Calls Answered Abandoned Rate Percent Calls Answered in 30 seconds
Call VolumePercent
Answered & Abandoned
Contact Center Performance Over Time
© Robert E. Nolan Company, Inc. www.renolan.com |
LOMA Customer Service ConferenceMarch 2008 Page 47
Optimizing Individual PerformanceFour key metrics to identify agent development needs:1. After Call Work (ACW) – high times can mean extra breaks
or handling issues
2. Short Calls – intentional or unintentional disconnects that drive up ratios
3. Average Hold Time per Call – ties up extra staff, not good service, may be training need (excessive documentation)
4. Percent Schedule Adherence – low value means wasted resources, anything under 80% is a performance problem
Talk Time is not recommended as a metric, it may lead to the wrong result by focusing on getting off the phone
instead of handling the call
© Robert E. Nolan Company, Inc. www.renolan.com |
LOMA Customer Service ConferenceMarch 2008 Page 48
Productivity Reporting
© Robert E. Nolan Company, Inc. www.renolan.com |
LOMA Customer Service ConferenceMarch 2008 Page 49
Adherence Reporting
© Robert E. Nolan Company, Inc. www.renolan.com |
LOMA Customer Service ConferenceMarch 2008 Page 50
Future Enhancements
§ Currently piloting a new business contact center – Pooled phone resources able to handle either type of call
§ Testing 2 to 3 people off the phones for two weeks– Keeping an eye on phone queue and logging in when necessary– Process work from the phones, handle queues and mailboxes – Others are logged into the phones 100% of their productive time– Improved abandon rate and service levels
GOAL: Better leverage resources, focus, increase scopeof staff’s responsibility, improve service
GOAL: Improve task efficiency, provide breaks for staff, create time for projects and longer work
© Robert E. Nolan Company, Inc. www.renolan.com |
LOMA Customer Service ConferenceMarch 2008 Page 51
Thank you for your attention
Questions?Presented by:
Kirsten KaczorServices Team Manager
American Family Life Insurance Company
Steve CallahanPractice Development DirectorThe Robert E. Nolan Company