2007_ihe_eye_care_connectathon_results

5
2007 IHE Eye Care Connectathon Results On October 8-11, the IHE Eye Care convened a 4 day Connectathon, a face-to-face interoperability testing event based on the IHE Eye Care Technical Framework Year 2. The purpose of the Connectathon was to test implementation of the IHE capabilities in commercially available systems. This was a requirement for participation in The Electronic Office, the Interoperability Showcase at the AAO 2007 Annual Meeting. The testing process provided a unique opportunity for vendors to test the IHE integration capabilities implemented in their systems with each other in a neutral forum sponsored by IHE Eye Care, managed by IHE Eye Care project managers, and hosted by the Radiological Society of North America. The IHE Technical Framework defines a subset of the functional components of the healthcare enterprise, called IHE Actors, and specifies their interactions in terms of a set of coordinated, standards-based transactions. These transactions are organized into functional units called Integration Profiles that highlight their capacity to address specific clinical needs. Three separate profiles, which represent different integration problems, were used in the testing process: Eye Care Workflow, Charge Posting and Eye Care Evidence Document. The Eye Care Workflow Integration Profile deals with the coordination and exchange of information of the following tasks that are part of every patient visit: admit or register patients, order tests/images for patient, schedule procedures, create a worklist (or list of procedures that were ordered), monitor the status of procedures performed, create images, manage or keep track of images created, store images and display images. The Charge Posting Profile provides a solution for collecting and posting timely billable procedural details. The Evidence Document Profile is intended for the incorporation of additional measurements and observations as documents: creating, storing, retrieving and using these different documents as a record of evidence. The following companies participated: Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc., Compulink Business Systems, Heidelberg Engineering, ifa Systems, Kowa, Medflow, Inc., MDoffice, Nidek, Ophthalmic Imaging Systems, Inc., Ophthalmic Technologies, Inc., Topcon Medical Systems, Inc., and VersaSuite. During the 4 days of testing, these vendors with 15 different systems, executed 115 peer- to-peer tests under the supervision of the Connectathon monitors. This included 1 day of full workflow testing where all the vendors participated to demonstrate end-to-end integration, from patient registration and ordering, through image acquisition, storage and display, and to automatic posting of charges based on the procedures performed. These vendors tested for their different roles/actors. The charts below can be used as an aid to determine what level of integration this product supports with other systems and what benefits such integration might provide. Not all tests for each configuration were

Upload: ifa-systems

Post on 05-Mar-2016

212 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

http://www.ifa4emr.com/images/2007_ihe_eye_care_connectathon_results.pdf

TRANSCRIPT

2007 IHE Eye Care Connectathon Results

On October 8-11, the IHE Eye Care convened a 4 day Connectathon, a face-to-face

interoperability testing event based on the IHE Eye Care Technical Framework Year 2.

The purpose of the Connectathon was to test implementation of the IHE capabilities in

commercially available systems. This was a requirement for participation in The

Electronic Office, the Interoperability Showcase at the AAO 2007 Annual Meeting. The

testing process provided a unique opportunity for vendors to test the IHE integration

capabilities implemented in their systems with each other in a neutral forum sponsored by

IHE Eye Care, managed by IHE Eye Care project managers, and hosted by the

Radiological Society of North America.

The IHE Technical Framework defines a subset of the functional components of the

healthcare enterprise, called IHE Actors, and specifies their interactions in terms of a set

of coordinated, standards-based transactions. These transactions are organized into

functional units called Integration Profiles that highlight their capacity to address specific

clinical needs. Three separate profiles, which represent different integration problems,

were used in the testing process: Eye Care Workflow, Charge Posting and Eye Care

Evidence Document. The Eye Care Workflow Integration Profile deals with the

coordination and exchange of information of the following tasks that are part of every

patient visit: admit or register patients, order tests/images for patient, schedule

procedures, create a worklist (or list of procedures that were ordered), monitor the status

of procedures performed, create images, manage or keep track of images created, store

images and display images. The Charge Posting Profile provides a solution for collecting

and posting timely billable procedural details. The Evidence Document Profile is

intended for the incorporation of additional measurements and observations as

documents: creating, storing, retrieving and using these different documents as a record

of evidence.

The following companies participated: Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc., Compulink Business

Systems, Heidelberg Engineering, ifa Systems, Kowa, Medflow, Inc., MDoffice, Nidek,

Ophthalmic Imaging Systems, Inc., Ophthalmic Technologies, Inc., Topcon Medical

Systems, Inc., and VersaSuite.

During the 4 days of testing, these vendors with 15 different systems, executed 115 peer-

to-peer tests under the supervision of the Connectathon monitors. This included 1 day of

full workflow testing where all the vendors participated to demonstrate end-to-end

integration, from patient registration and ordering, through image acquisition, storage and

display, and to automatic posting of charges based on the procedures performed.

These vendors tested for their different roles/actors. The charts below can be used as an

aid to determine what level of integration this product supports with other systems and

what benefits such integration might provide. Not all tests for each configuration were

able to be completed at the IHE Eye Care Connectathon. Potential purchasers should

also refer to the individual vendors’ IHE Integration Statements and DICOM

conformance statements to see exactly what software versions are able to be integrated

and for additional details.

For the Eye Care Workflow Integration Profile:

Vendor System Tested Actor(s)

Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc. Humphrey ®Field

Analyzer/HFA

Acquisition Modality

Compulink Business System EyeMD Advantage

(Practice Management

and Medical Records),

Software Version 9.0

ADT Patient Registration

Heidelberg Engineering Heidelberg Retina

Tomograph 3, Software

Version 3.1.0

Acquisition Modality

ifa Systems, AG Ifa eyecare software

(Electronic Health

Record), Software

Version 6.0

Order Placer, Order Filler

Kowa Optimed, Inc. Non-mydriatic α-D 5

Mega Digital Imaging

Software, Software

Version 4.1.3.0

Acquisition Modality

MDoffice Practice Management

and Medical Records

MD Office, Software

Version 6

ADT Patient Registration,

Order Placer

Medflow, Inc. Medflow Ophthalmic

Suite (Electronic Health

Record) oiPractice,

Software Version 1.0

Order Filler

oiServer, (image PACS)

Software Version 1.1

Image Manager/Image

Archive, Image Display

Nidek, Inc. NAVIS-Lite (digital

imaging and

communications),

Software Version 1.0.0

Acquisition Modality

Ophthalmic Imaging

Systems

WinStation (digital

fundus imaging),

Software Version 10.5

Acquisition Modality

Ophthalmic Technologies,

Inc.

Spectral OCT/SLO Acquisition Modality

Ultrasound Acquisition Modality

Topcon Medical Systems IMAGEnet (digital

imaging systems)

Acquisition Modality

Slit-lamp biomicroscope Acquisition Modality

Eyeroute (image PACS),

Software Version 7.0

Image Display

VersaSuite VersaSuite (image Image Display

PACS), Software

Version 7.9

For the Charge Posting Integration Profile:

Vendor System Tested Actor(s)

Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc. Humphrey ®Field

Analyzer/HFA

Acquisition Modality

Heidelberg Engineering Heidelberg Retina

Tomograph 3, Software

Version 3.1.0

Acquisition Modality

ifa Systems, AG Ifa eyecare software

(Electronic Health

Record), Software

Version 6.0

Order Placer, Order Filler

Kowa Optimed, Inc. Non-mydriatic α-D 5

Mega Digital Imaging

Software, Software

Version 4.1.3.0

Acquisition Modality

MDoffice Practice Management

and Medical Records

MD Office, Software

Version 6

Charge Processor

Medflow, Inc. Medflow Ophthalmic

Suite (Electronic Health

Record) oiPractice,

Software Version 1.0

Order Filler

Nidek, Inc. NAVIS-Lite (digital

imaging and

communications),

Software Version 1.0.0

Acquisition Modality

Ophthalmic Imaging

Systems

WinStation (digital

fundus imaging),

Software Version 10.5

Acquisition Modality

Ophthalmic Technologies,

Inc.

Spectral OCT/SLO Acquisition Modality

Ultrasound Acquisition Modality

Topcon Medical Systems IMAGEnet (digital

imaging systems)

Acquisition Modality

Slit-lamp biomicroscope Acquisition Modality

As a pre-requisite to the Connectathon, participants validated their DICOM

implementations with a third party. These participants demonstrated the following

DICOM object implementations at the Connectathon:

Vendor System Tested DICOM Standard

Kowa Optimed, Inc. Non-mydriatic α-D 5 Ophthalmic Photography

Mega Digital Imaging

Software, Software

Version 4.1.3.0

Nidek, Inc. NAVIS-Lite (digital

imaging and

communications),

Software Version 1.0.0

Ophthalmic Photography

Ophthalmic Imaging

Systems

WinStation (digital

fundus imaging),

Software Version 10.5

Ophthalmic Photography

Ophthalmic Technologies,

Inc.

Spectral OCT/SLO Ophthalmic Tomography

Ultrasound Ultrasound

Topcon Medical Systems IMAGEnet (digital

imaging systems)

Ophthalmic Photography