2007 ucsf stanford current issues in anatomic … ucsf stanford current issues in anatomic pathology...
TRANSCRIPT
Cartilage tumors of bone
2007 UCSF Stanford Current Issues in Anatomic Pathology
Andrew Horvai M.D. Ph.D.
Outline• Principles: Definitions, radiology, treatment • Common intramedullary tumors
– Chondroblastoma– Enchondroma– Conventional chondrosarcoma– Dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma– Variants: clear cell & mesenchymal chondrosarcoma
• Current issues and controversies– Grading– Malignant transformation– Cartilage tumors of small bones of hands and feet
Principles: Definitions• Unifying characteristics
– Production of a matrix rich aggrecan, a proteoglycan (65% water)
– Chondroitin sulfate Keratan sulfate
Principles: Radiology• Opacity
– Lytic– Sclerotic– Mixed
• Border– Marginated– Circumscribed– Moth eaten– Permeative
• Periosteum– Solid: Thickened cortex– Elevated: Codman’s triangle– Spiculated: New bone at right angles to cortex– Onion skin: New bone parallel to cortex
Principles: Treatment
Enchondroma ObservationCurettage
Grade I chondrosarcoma, chondroblastoma
Curettage and cement
Grade II-III chondrosarcoma
Wide local excision
Grade III chondrosarcoma AmputationChemotherapy
Principles: Syndromes
Syndrome MOI* Locus Gene Associated conditions
Malignanttransformation15-35%
15-50%
5-35%
Maffucci syndrome Sporadic Cavernous hemangiomas
Ollier disease(multiple enchondromatosis)
Sporadic 3p21-22 PTHR1(?)
Multiple osteochondromas
AD 8q24,11p11
EXT1, EXT2
Deformities of forearm, knee, short stature
*MOI: Mode of inheritance
Malignant transformation
• Chondroblastoma– Case reports (correct diagnosis?)– Benign metastasizing chondroblastoma
• Solitary Enchondroma– Case reports
• Sporadic Osteochondroma– 1-8%
Case 1
• 17 year old girl, injured her left knee playing soccer and has had persistent pain at the site prompting X-Rays
Clinical Radiology Histology Ddx
Age: 10-25Loc: Long bones
Recurrence: 15%, Higher in temporal bone.
Epiphysis +physisLytic, marginated,septae
•Fibrochondroid matrix•Chickenwire calcifications•Plasmacytoid, nuclear grooves
Moderate atypiaOsteoclast-giant cells
Giant cell tumorABC (30% association)
Chondroblastoma
Clinical Radiology Histology Ddx
Age: AllLoc: Hands/feet, long tubular bones
MetaphysisLytic, lobularRing calcificationsIntact cortex
LobularPeripheral ossificationNo permeationLow cellularityNo atypia/mitoses
Grade I Chondrosarcoma
Enchondroma
Enchondroma or Grade I chondrosarcoma?
• Enchondroma: “Multiple nodules of hyaline cartilage separated by normal marrow (and) plates of lamellar bone that conform to the irregular shapes of cartilage lobules.”
• Chondrosarcoma: “Single confluent mass of cartilage… trapping host lamellar bone or invasion into Haversian or Volkman systems.”
- J. Mirra (1985)
• Pitfalls– Small biopsy– Curettage– Small bones of hands and feet
Mirra JM et al. Clin Ortho Rel Res 1985 201:214-237
Enchondroma or Grade I chondrosarcoma?
• “Diagnosis should be based on what the tumor is doing to the patient” - Dr. Kempson– Progression over time– Radiology
Enchondroma or Grade I chondrosarcoma?• Radiographic features:
Most predictiveMost predictive Least predictiveLeast predictive
Pathologic fracture Axial skeleton Infiltratingmargin
Soft tissue mass Size > 5 cm Lobulated contour
Periosteal reaction
Cortical disruption or thickening
Murphey MD Flemming DJ Radiographics 1998; 18:1213-1237.Geirnaerdt et al A J roentgenol 1997;169:1097Brien EW Mirra JM Kerr Skeletal Rad 1997 Jun; 26(6) 325-53
• Genetic features:– Karyotype: (C.H.A.M.P. study)
• Enchondroma (n=14) and CHUMP (n=3): karyotypically normal• Grade I chondrosarcoma: Numerical and structural aberrations
(n=3).
– Comparative genomic hybridization:• Enchondroma: 13q21; 19, 22q• Chondrosarcoma: 2-11, 14, 15, 18, 21• Similar numbers aberrations
Enchondroma or Grade I chondrosarcoma?
Tallini, G., et al. J Pathol, 2002; 196(2):194Ozaki et al. Anticancer Res 2004; 1721
Conventional chondrosarcomaClinical Radiology Histology Ddx
Age: 50+Loc:
Central: pelvis, meta-diaphysis long bones
Peripheral: osteochondroma
Large (> 5 cm)Cortical disruptionEndosteal scallopingSoft tissue extensionRing calcifications
Permeates viable, lamellar boneHypercellularMyxoid changeAtypia NecrosisMitoses
EnchondromaClear cell chondrosarcomaChondroblastic OGS
Chondrosarcoma: GradingPROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN CHONDROSARCOMA
OF BONE A Clinicopathologic Analysis with Emphasis on Histologic Grading
HARRY L. EVANS, M.D.* ALBERTO G. AYALA, MD
AND MARVIN M. ROMSDAHL, MD, PHD
Cancer 40:818-831, 1977.
Histology 5 year survival
10 year survival
90
81
43
Grade I Hypercellular, uniform but hyperchromatic nuclei, nuclear detail not visible
83
Grade II Diffusely hypercellular, nuclei paler with visible intranuclear detail
64
Grade III Sheets of cells, larger nuclei, mitotic activity > 2mf/10 hpf
29
Chondrosarcoma: Grading• Subjective• No universally accepted scheme• High interobserver variability
• Despite limitations, grade does predict mortality, recurrence and metastasis
0
25
50
75
100
Mayo Rizzoli MD Anderson
Perc
ent o
f cas
es
I II III I II III I II III
1998 1981 1977
Chondrosarcoma of small bones of hands and feet
• Enchondromas of hands and feet– Clinical: Very common site (~30%), painful,
pathologic fracture common– Radiographs: Cortical erosion common– Histology: Hypercellular, myxoid change,
nuclear hyperchromasia, permeation within medulla
• Mayo Clinic: (n=163) 12/70 metastasized– Radiographs: Permeative pattern, cortical
destruction, soft tissue mass– Histology: Permeation through cortex into soft
tissue (“sweating”)• Baylor (n=15) 0/8 metastasized.• Leiden (phalanges only, n=35) 0/28
metastasized
Chondrosarcoma of small bones of hands and feet
• Meta analysis (Grades I-III)
Site Recurrence MetastasisPhalanges 29/115 (25%) 2/115 (<2%)
Metacarpals metatarsals,Carpals, tarsals
26/62 (42%) 16/62 (26%)
All other sites ~35% ~25%
Chondrosarcoma of small bones of hands and feet
• Metacarpals, metatarsals, wrist and ankle:– Diagnosis requires either grade III cytology if
equivocal radiology or evidence of soft tissue involvement
• Phalanges:– Probably does exist but with a metastatic rate
that is very low– Local resection is favored over amputation
whenever possible.
Summary: chondrosarcoma of small bones of hands and feet
Dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma
Clinical Radiology Histology Ddx
Age: Adult >50Loc: Pelvis>Femur>Humerus5 year survival < 10%
MetaphysisBimorphic (especially on MRI)
Abrupt transition:1. Chondrosarcoma I2. OGS / MFH / FS
Chondroblastic osteosarcoma-Less abrupt transition-High grade chondroid component
Take-home messages• Correlation of radiologic, clinical and histologic features
critical, especially in low-grade lesions• Permeation is the most sensitive histologic criterion
separating enchondroma from chondrosarcoma.• Chondrosarcoma of small bones of the hands and feet
should be diagnosed with caution. • Grade is most important prognostic indicator for
chondrosarcoma• Chondrosarcomas are predominantly locally aggressive,
but local disease can be fatal even in the absence of metastases
Mesenchymal chondrosarcomaClinical Radiology Histology Ddx
Age: 20-30Loc: Jaw, rib, pelvis, soft tissueMultifocal
10yr survival 25% Variable course
LyticRing calcificationsRarely circumscribed
1. Benign cartilage islands/perivascular2. Small round blue cell tumorHPC-ish vessels common
Ewing sarcoma (CD99)Dediff chondrosarc (abrupt)Small cell osteosarcoma
Clear cell chondrosarcomaClinical Radiology Histology Ddx
Age: 25-50 M>FLoc: Proximal femurSkull, rib, spineSlow growing~25% Metastasize~15% mortality
EpiphysisCircumscribedEarly: lytic, septaeLate: sclerotic
Permeates Osteogenic “No” hyaline cartilageClear cells, well defined membrane, macronucleoli (S100+)
Chondroblastic osteosarcomaOsteoblastoma
Chondroblastoma (radiology Ddx)