2007 california fire siege macs operation center october 21-31, 2007 after action review

21
2007 California Fire Siege MACS Operation Center October 21-31, 2007 AFTER ACTION REVIEW

Upload: mustafa-collard

Post on 14-Dec-2015

217 views

Category:

Documents


4 download

TRANSCRIPT

2007 California Fire SiegeMACS Operation Center

October 21-31, 2007

AFTER ACTION REVIEW

2007 Southern California Fire 2007 Southern California Fire SiegeSiege

During the 2007 California Fire Siege, there were numerous emergency management successes, with nearly 1 million people successfully evacuated, and thousands of threatened homes and businesses saved.

This catastrophic cascade of region-wide wildfire disasters resulted in approximately 518,000 acres burned, 10 lives lost, 116 persons injured, 4 commercial buildings and 2,008 residences destroyed.

2007 Southern California Fire 2007 Southern California Fire SiegeSiege

The Southern California fire siege began on October 20, 2007. During the first four days of this sustained wind event, firefighting agencies successfully suppressed 251 fires, or approximately 90 percent of the ignitions during the initial attack phase.

Even though firefighters’ initial attack efforts on the numerous fires were highly successful in protecting life, property and resources, a number of these fires raged into large fire scenarios.

2007 Southern California Fire 2007 Southern California Fire SiegeSiege

At 0800 hours on October 22, 2007 the MAC Group convened at the Southern California Operations Coordination Center in Riverside (South Ops).

2007 Southern California Fire 2007 Southern California Fire SiegeSiege

Establish priorities for response Allocate critical resources based on established priorities Communicate systems Integration Coordinate Information Intergovernmental decision coordination Develop geographic strategies and contingency plans

MAC Group Objectives

Each operational period, using the Incident Priority Rating Matrix (MACS Form 429), the MAC Group prioritized the incidents based on the most current available information, and subsequently directed South Ops to mobilize available critical resources.

In a number of instances, when firefighting resources were scarce, firefighter safety became a consideration for the allocation of resources. The strength of the MAC Group was its ability to objectively prioritize incidents based on the information derived from the decision matrix and not on needs of the individual agencies.

2007 Southern California Fire 2007 Southern California Fire SiegeSiege

2007 Southern California Fire 2007 Southern California Fire SiegeSiege

In the After Action Report there were 15 identified “successes” In the After Action Report there were 15 identified “successes” by the MAC Group. The following highlights a few of those:by the MAC Group. The following highlights a few of those:

MAC Group representatives maintained objective focus on MAC Group representatives maintained objective focus on priorities allowing for a consensus, decision-making processes.priorities allowing for a consensus, decision-making processes.

The MAC Group relied on multiple sources of information. The MAC Group relied on multiple sources of information.

The MAC Group was able to expedite filling critical resource needs The MAC Group was able to expedite filling critical resource needs based on information obtained directly from their communication based on information obtained directly from their communication centers. centers.

The MAC Group was able to prioritize and recommend The MAC Group was able to prioritize and recommend the assignment of available critical resources by kind the assignment of available critical resources by kind and type.and type.

2007 Southern California Fire 2007 Southern California Fire SiegeSiege

Identified “successes” (continued):Identified “successes” (continued):

The development of the Decision Support Briefing document by the The development of the Decision Support Briefing document by the Planning and Operations Sections of the National Incident Management Planning and Operations Sections of the National Incident Management Organization (NIMO), who had been assigned upon request to the MAC Organization (NIMO), who had been assigned upon request to the MAC Group, consolidated intelligence information into a simple format that Group, consolidated intelligence information into a simple format that improved the efficiency of the decision processimproved the efficiency of the decision process

There was early recognition by the MAC Group that a Military There was early recognition by the MAC Group that a Military Liaison was necessary to assist in the coordination of military Liaison was necessary to assist in the coordination of military assets used on the incidents. assets used on the incidents.

The MAC Group exercised discipline and maintained team The MAC Group exercised discipline and maintained team focus in a sequestered settingfocus in a sequestered setting

The MAC Group requested executive level feedback to The MAC Group requested executive level feedback to validate the group’s direction and effectivenessvalidate the group’s direction and effectiveness

The MAC Group recognized the need for improved intelligence The MAC Group recognized the need for improved intelligence for the fires occurring in San Diego County. CAL FIRE provided an for the fires occurring in San Diego County. CAL FIRE provided an operational area representative to the group to fill this need. operational area representative to the group to fill this need.

2007 Southern California Fire 2007 Southern California Fire SiegeSiege

During the MACS activation there were multiple “challenges” During the MACS activation there were multiple “challenges” encountered by the MAC Group. The following outlines a few of encountered by the MAC Group. The following outlines a few of these challenges:these challenges:

Due to incident activity in their own jurisdictions some Due to incident activity in their own jurisdictions some member agencies were unable to provide a representative upon member agencies were unable to provide a representative upon initial activation.initial activation.

The group used valuable time to review, discuss, and better define The group used valuable time to review, discuss, and better define the criteria objectives identified in the MACS 410-1 for the incident the criteria objectives identified in the MACS 410-1 for the incident priority process. Although the objectives were posted for constant priority process. Although the objectives were posted for constant review, some interpretations remained vague on specific criteria review, some interpretations remained vague on specific criteria definitions. definitions.

The rapidly escalating fire situation hampered intelligence The rapidly escalating fire situation hampered intelligence gathering. Some Incident Status Summary Reports were not available gathering. Some Incident Status Summary Reports were not available to the MAC Group for review prior to conducting the priority process. to the MAC Group for review prior to conducting the priority process.

2007 Southern California Fire 2007 Southern California Fire SiegeSiege

Multiple “challenges” (continued):Multiple “challenges” (continued):

Due to the number and frequency of new fire starts, the prioritization Due to the number and frequency of new fire starts, the prioritization process was conducted twice a day. As the fire activity stabilized, the process was conducted twice a day. As the fire activity stabilized, the prioritization process was done once per day. The MAC Group prioritization process was done once per day. The MAC Group determined that situation dynamics would dictate the frequency of the determined that situation dynamics would dictate the frequency of the prioritization process. prioritization process.

The group encountered challenges with the MAC Center facility. The group encountered challenges with the MAC Center facility. Certain actions were taken to improve the process and more Certain actions were taken to improve the process and more effectively perform the objectives. New technologies and systems effectively perform the objectives. New technologies and systems exist that have not been institutionalized such as Google mapping, exist that have not been institutionalized such as Google mapping, video conferencing, military imaging capabilities, and other cutting-video conferencing, military imaging capabilities, and other cutting-edge technologies. edge technologies.

2007 Southern California Fire 2007 Southern California Fire SiegeSiege

ThThe MACe MAC group identified opportunities for future program group identified opportunities for future program enhancements: enhancements:

Request a Planning Section Chief (PSC) to assist the MAC Request a Planning Section Chief (PSC) to assist the MAC GroupGroup

Require that the agency representative within the MAC Group Require that the agency representative within the MAC Group proactively acquire incident information from all available proactively acquire incident information from all available sources. sources.

Verify that an alternate resource ordering process is in place in Verify that an alternate resource ordering process is in place in the event of system overload or failurethe event of system overload or failure

Maintain a simple, consistent “big picture” format for the Intel Maintain a simple, consistent “big picture” format for the Intel summary package. summary package.

2007 Southern California Fire 2007 Southern California Fire SiegeSiege

Identified opportunities for future program enhancements Identified opportunities for future program enhancements (continued):(continued):

Ensure that all MAC Group members are briefed on the Ensure that all MAC Group members are briefed on the process, objectives, meeting agendas, and member conduct. process, objectives, meeting agendas, and member conduct.

Maintain consistency among group representation to provide Maintain consistency among group representation to provide continuity in the MAC processcontinuity in the MAC process

Assignment to the MAC Group must be viewed as any other Assignment to the MAC Group must be viewed as any other incident assignment and not as an ancillary duty. incident assignment and not as an ancillary duty.

Request that a dedicated Intelligence Officer (internal and/or Request that a dedicated Intelligence Officer (internal and/or external) be assigned to the MAC Group for the purpose of bringing external) be assigned to the MAC Group for the purpose of bringing consolidated, unified information back for reviewconsolidated, unified information back for review

2007 Southern California Fire 2007 Southern California Fire SiegeSiege

Identified opportunities for future program enhancements Identified opportunities for future program enhancements (continued):(continued):

Consider incorporating all-hazard MACS forms and processes.Consider incorporating all-hazard MACS forms and processes.

Recognize the need for access to state-of-the-art tools. Recognize the need for access to state-of-the-art tools.

Provide an environment that is free from disruption that allows for Provide an environment that is free from disruption that allows for open discussion relative to the prioritization process. open discussion relative to the prioritization process.

2007 Southern California Fire 2007 Southern California Fire SiegeSiege

…with more than fifteen thousand fire and emergency personnel effectively mobilized from over 1100 assisting agencies.

The MAC Group prioritized incidents and coordinated firefighting resource support for twenty-two large wildfires…

2007 Southern California Fire 2007 Southern California Fire SiegeSiege

Interagency cooperation and executive management oversight contributed greatly to the overall effectiveness of the MAC group.

2007 Southern California Fire 2007 Southern California Fire SiegeSiege

2007 Southern California Fire 2007 Southern California Fire SiegeSiege

Some 207,399 fewer acres burned in the 2007 siege, than burned in 2003—even though there were almost twice as many fires requiring large fire strategy and deployment—13 fires in 2003, and 22 fires in 2007.

By comparison to 2003, more personnel and resources deployed faster, fewer acres burned, fewer lives were lost, and fewer structures burned in the Siege of 2007.

2007 Southern California Fire 2007 Southern California Fire SiegeSiege

The successes of the 2003 mobilization set the benchmark for excellence in the 2007 Southern California fire siege.

2003

2007

2007 Southern California Fire 2007 Southern California Fire SiegeSiege

Complimenting the successful initial attack of nearly 90% of the wildfires ignited during the siege, the firefighting agencies’ well-organized extended attack effort kept the potential magnitude of this disaster comparatively small. These efforts saved many lives, thousands of homes, and damage to and natural resources.

2007 Southern California Fire 2007 Southern California Fire SiegeSiege

It is the intent of this MAC Group’s After Action Review that ongoing management enhancements remain a top priority.

Chief Jorge Camargo, Orange Co. Fire Authority*Chief Jorge Camargo, Orange Co. Fire Authority*Chief Tom Drayer, CA-OES Fire*Chief Tom Drayer, CA-OES Fire*Chief Mark Sanchez, Ventura Co. Fire Department*Chief Mark Sanchez, Ventura Co. Fire Department*Chief Mark Schmitt, Santa Barbara Co. Fire Department* Chief Mark Schmitt, Santa Barbara Co. Fire Department* Chief Lee Delap, CAL FIRE* Chief Lee Delap, CAL FIRE* Chief Nick Dunn, Kern Co. Fire Department*Chief Nick Dunn, Kern Co. Fire Department*Chief Dave Stone, Los Angeles Co. Fire Department*Chief Dave Stone, Los Angeles Co. Fire Department*Chief John Martinez, Los Angeles Fire Department*Chief John Martinez, Los Angeles Fire Department*Chief Ralph Domanski, USFS*Chief Ralph Domanski, USFS*Chief Brad Harris, CAL FIRE/San Diego Op Area Rep.Chief Brad Harris, CAL FIRE/San Diego Op Area Rep.Chief Les Matarazzi, U.S. DOI*Chief Les Matarazzi, U.S. DOI*

2007 Southern California Fire 2007 Southern California Fire SiegeSiege

MAC Group SignatorsMAC Group Signators

*FIRESCOPE Member Agency Representative*FIRESCOPE Member Agency Representative