2005.04.04-mse376-l02-lithography

Upload: vdaditya1000

Post on 07-Apr-2018

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/6/2019 2005.04.04-mse376-l02-lithography

    1/15

    Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Northwestern University

    Nanomaterials

    Lecture 2: Lithography

  • 8/6/2019 2005.04.04-mse376-l02-lithography

    2/15

    Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Northwestern University

    Lithography

    G. D. Hutcheson, et al., Scientific American, 290, 76 (2004).

  • 8/6/2019 2005.04.04-mse376-l02-lithography

    3/15

    Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Northwestern University

    PHOTORESIST

    SiO2 LAYER

    Si3N4 LAYER

    Si SUBSTRATE

    1PREPARED

    Si WAFER

    PROJECTED

    LIGHT

    RETICLE

    (OR MASK)

    2

    3

    LENS

    PATTERNS ARE PROJECTEDREPEATEDLY ONTO WAFER

    EXPOSED

    PHOTORESIST

    IS REMOVED

    AREAS UNPROTECTED

    BY PHOTORESIST ARE

    ETCHED BY GASES

    4

    5

    6

    DOPED

    REGION

    IONS SHOWER THE ETCHED

    AREAS, DOPING THEM

    METAL

    CONNECTOR

    NEW PHOTORESIST IS SPUN

    ON WAFER AND STEPS 2 TO 4

    ARE REPEATED

    SIMILAR CYCLE IS REPEATED

    TO LAY DOWN METAL LINKS

    BETWEEN TRANSISTORS

    G. D. Hutcheson, et al., Scientific American, 274, 54 (1996).

    Typical Lithographic Process Flow

  • 8/6/2019 2005.04.04-mse376-l02-lithography

    4/15Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Northwestern University

    G. D. Hutcheson, et al., Scientific American, 290, 76 (2004).

    Lithography

  • 8/6/2019 2005.04.04-mse376-l02-lithography

    5/15Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Northwestern University

    PHOTORESIST

    SiO2 LAYER

    Si3N4 LAYER

    Si SUBSTRATE

    1PREPARED

    Si WAFER

    PROJECTED

    LIGHT

    RETICLE

    (OR MASK)

    2

    3

    LENS

    PATTERNS ARE PROJECTEDREPEATEDLY ONTO WAFER

    EXPOSED

    PHOTORESIST

    IS REMOVED

    AREAS UNPROTECTED

    BY PHOTORESIST ARE

    ETCHED BY GASES

    4

    5

    6

    DOPED

    REGION

    IONS SHOWER THE ETCHED

    AREAS, DOPING THEM

    METAL

    CONNECTOR

    NEW PHOTORESIST IS SPUN

    ON WAFER AND STEPS 2 TO 4

    ARE REPEATED

    SIMILAR CYCLE IS REPEATED

    TO LAY DOWN METAL LINKS

    BETWEEN TRANSISTORS

    G. D. Hutcheson, et al., Scientific American, 274, 54 (1996).

    Typical Lithographic Process Flow

  • 8/6/2019 2005.04.04-mse376-l02-lithography

    6/15Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Northwestern University

    NOTE: Typical fabrication facilities (fabs) have product yields > 95% Lithography yield per step > 99%

    Lithography is 90% of the production cost in modern day fabs

    G. Timp,Nanotechnology, Chapter 4

    Lithography Yield

  • 8/6/2019 2005.04.04-mse376-l02-lithography

    7/15Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Northwestern University

    Phenomenological

    Relationship:

    Resolution () ~ 23At0.2

    (At= areal throughput in m2/hr)

    This phenomenologicalrelationship is essentially trueover18 orders of magnitude

    in throughput!

    G. Timp,Nanotechnology, Chapter 4

    Lithography Areal Throughput

  • 8/6/2019 2005.04.04-mse376-l02-lithography

    8/15

    Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Northwestern University

    (1) Small dimensions (linewidth)(2) Small variations in dimensions (linewidth control)(3) Large depth of focus (tolerance of non-planar substrates and

    thick resists)(4) Accurate alignment of subsequent patterns (registration)

    (5) Low distortion of image and sample (high quality masks,projection systems)

    (6) Low cost (high throughput)

    (7) High reliability (high yield)(8) Tolerance of contamination particles on mask and sample

    (clean room requirements)

    (9) Uniformity over large areas (large wafers)

    Requirements of a Lithography System

  • 8/6/2019 2005.04.04-mse376-l02-lithography

    9/15

    Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Northwestern University

    Pathways from pattern design topattern transfer:

    (1) Can be direct (e.g., e-beam or ionbeam lithography)

    (2) Usually a 2 step process(A) Generation of mask

    (B) Transfer of its pattern to alarge number of substrates

    R. Waser (ed.),Nanoelectronics and Information Technology, Chapter 9

    Lithography Pathways

  • 8/6/2019 2005.04.04-mse376-l02-lithography

    10/15

    Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Northwestern University

    Contact Proximity Projection

    R. Waser (ed.),Nanoelectronics and Information Technology, Chapter 9

    Masking Methods

  • 8/6/2019 2005.04.04-mse376-l02-lithography

    11/15

    Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Northwestern University

    Resists: (1) Positive exposure degrades resist (dark field mask)

    (2) Negative

    exposure hardens resist (light field mask)

    Resists

  • 8/6/2019 2005.04.04-mse376-l02-lithography

    12/15

    Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Northwestern University

    (1) High sensitivity less exposure time lower cost

    (2) Contrast (only brightly illuminated areas are affected)

    (3) Adhesion to substrate

    (4) Etch resistance (enables subsequent processing)

    (5) Resist profile control (flexibility for lift-off)

    Requirements of a Resist

  • 8/6/2019 2005.04.04-mse376-l02-lithography

    13/15

    Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Northwestern University

    Optical Lithography Process

  • 8/6/2019 2005.04.04-mse376-l02-lithography

    14/15

    Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Northwestern University

    Etching: (a) Develop resist on top of deposited layer

    (b) Underlying material is removed by etching throughopenings in the mask

    Lift-off: (a) Deposit material on top of developed resist

    (b) Material is lifted-off when resist is removed

    Etching versus Lift-off

  • 8/6/2019 2005.04.04-mse376-l02-lithography

    15/15

    Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Northwestern University

    Minimum feature size = k/NA

    where k= proportionality factor(typically 0.5 for diffraction limited systems)

    = wavelength

    NA = numerical aperture = sin (2 = acceptance angle of lens at point of focus) measure of light gathering power of lens

    However, depth of focus = /(NA)2

    important because wafers are not flat

    Increasing NA is not the answer reduce to reduce feature size

    Limitations of Optical Lithography