starmanstarman.com/hoa/twinriversdecisionjan2004.pdf · 2005. 1. 23. · uniform application of the...

81

Upload: others

Post on 09-Mar-2021

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: StarMAnstarman.com/hoa/twinriversdecisionjan2004.pdf · 2005. 1. 23. · uniform application of the laws. Court holds that any exemption of prior condos by law is valid. Yet, courts
Page 2: StarMAnstarman.com/hoa/twinriversdecisionjan2004.pdf · 2005. 1. 23. · uniform application of the laws. Court holds that any exemption of prior condos by law is valid. Yet, courts
Page 3: StarMAnstarman.com/hoa/twinriversdecisionjan2004.pdf · 2005. 1. 23. · uniform application of the laws. Court holds that any exemption of prior condos by law is valid. Yet, courts
Page 4: StarMAnstarman.com/hoa/twinriversdecisionjan2004.pdf · 2005. 1. 23. · uniform application of the laws. Court holds that any exemption of prior condos by law is valid. Yet, courts
Page 5: StarMAnstarman.com/hoa/twinriversdecisionjan2004.pdf · 2005. 1. 23. · uniform application of the laws. Court holds that any exemption of prior condos by law is valid. Yet, courts
GKS
quasi-municipal
GKS
Note
fines as violation of police powers
Page 6: StarMAnstarman.com/hoa/twinriversdecisionjan2004.pdf · 2005. 1. 23. · uniform application of the laws. Court holds that any exemption of prior condos by law is valid. Yet, courts
GKS
Note
business judgment rule prevails for HOAs
Page 7: StarMAnstarman.com/hoa/twinriversdecisionjan2004.pdf · 2005. 1. 23. · uniform application of the laws. Court holds that any exemption of prior condos by law is valid. Yet, courts
GKS
Note
quasi-municipality statutory definition
Page 8: StarMAnstarman.com/hoa/twinriversdecisionjan2004.pdf · 2005. 1. 23. · uniform application of the laws. Court holds that any exemption of prior condos by law is valid. Yet, courts
admin
Note
quasi-municipality court interpretation
Page 9: StarMAnstarman.com/hoa/twinriversdecisionjan2004.pdf · 2005. 1. 23. · uniform application of the laws. Court holds that any exemption of prior condos by law is valid. Yet, courts
admin
Note
Gillman case cited. Court rejects arguments about fines. The power to impose fines "is not necessarily a delegation of the police powers"
Page 10: StarMAnstarman.com/hoa/twinriversdecisionjan2004.pdf · 2005. 1. 23. · uniform application of the laws. Court holds that any exemption of prior condos by law is valid. Yet, courts
admin
Note
fines -- just a mutual agreement by condo members, not a police power. Enforcing rules by fines is not a police power.
Page 11: StarMAnstarman.com/hoa/twinriversdecisionjan2004.pdf · 2005. 1. 23. · uniform application of the laws. Court holds that any exemption of prior condos by law is valid. Yet, courts
Page 12: StarMAnstarman.com/hoa/twinriversdecisionjan2004.pdf · 2005. 1. 23. · uniform application of the laws. Court holds that any exemption of prior condos by law is valid. Yet, courts
admin
Note
uniform application of the laws. Court holds that any exemption of prior condos by law is valid. Yet, courts have applied new CC&R amendments to prior conditions and contracts. This is conflicting application of the law.
Page 13: StarMAnstarman.com/hoa/twinriversdecisionjan2004.pdf · 2005. 1. 23. · uniform application of the laws. Court holds that any exemption of prior condos by law is valid. Yet, courts
Page 14: StarMAnstarman.com/hoa/twinriversdecisionjan2004.pdf · 2005. 1. 23. · uniform application of the laws. Court holds that any exemption of prior condos by law is valid. Yet, courts
admin
Note
uniform application of the laws. Court argues for strict interpretation and unequal application of statute to class of owners prior to 1993.
Page 15: StarMAnstarman.com/hoa/twinriversdecisionjan2004.pdf · 2005. 1. 23. · uniform application of the laws. Court holds that any exemption of prior condos by law is valid. Yet, courts
Page 16: StarMAnstarman.com/hoa/twinriversdecisionjan2004.pdf · 2005. 1. 23. · uniform application of the laws. Court holds that any exemption of prior condos by law is valid. Yet, courts
Page 17: StarMAnstarman.com/hoa/twinriversdecisionjan2004.pdf · 2005. 1. 23. · uniform application of the laws. Court holds that any exemption of prior condos by law is valid. Yet, courts
Page 18: StarMAnstarman.com/hoa/twinriversdecisionjan2004.pdf · 2005. 1. 23. · uniform application of the laws. Court holds that any exemption of prior condos by law is valid. Yet, courts
Page 19: StarMAnstarman.com/hoa/twinriversdecisionjan2004.pdf · 2005. 1. 23. · uniform application of the laws. Court holds that any exemption of prior condos by law is valid. Yet, courts
Page 20: StarMAnstarman.com/hoa/twinriversdecisionjan2004.pdf · 2005. 1. 23. · uniform application of the laws. Court holds that any exemption of prior condos by law is valid. Yet, courts
Page 21: StarMAnstarman.com/hoa/twinriversdecisionjan2004.pdf · 2005. 1. 23. · uniform application of the laws. Court holds that any exemption of prior condos by law is valid. Yet, courts
Page 22: StarMAnstarman.com/hoa/twinriversdecisionjan2004.pdf · 2005. 1. 23. · uniform application of the laws. Court holds that any exemption of prior condos by law is valid. Yet, courts
admin
Note
adhesion contract -- cannot waive constitutional rights where ther is no explicit awareness of any such waiver.
Page 23: StarMAnstarman.com/hoa/twinriversdecisionjan2004.pdf · 2005. 1. 23. · uniform application of the laws. Court holds that any exemption of prior condos by law is valid. Yet, courts
Page 24: StarMAnstarman.com/hoa/twinriversdecisionjan2004.pdf · 2005. 1. 23. · uniform application of the laws. Court holds that any exemption of prior condos by law is valid. Yet, courts
admin
Note
covenants prevail over constitution since they are voluntary private agreements. Question of reasonableness ignores supreme law of the land factor.
Page 25: StarMAnstarman.com/hoa/twinriversdecisionjan2004.pdf · 2005. 1. 23. · uniform application of the laws. Court holds that any exemption of prior condos by law is valid. Yet, courts
Page 26: StarMAnstarman.com/hoa/twinriversdecisionjan2004.pdf · 2005. 1. 23. · uniform application of the laws. Court holds that any exemption of prior condos by law is valid. Yet, courts
Page 27: StarMAnstarman.com/hoa/twinriversdecisionjan2004.pdf · 2005. 1. 23. · uniform application of the laws. Court holds that any exemption of prior condos by law is valid. Yet, courts
Page 28: StarMAnstarman.com/hoa/twinriversdecisionjan2004.pdf · 2005. 1. 23. · uniform application of the laws. Court holds that any exemption of prior condos by law is valid. Yet, courts
admin
Note
free speech restriction justification -- reasonable decision made in good faith.
Page 29: StarMAnstarman.com/hoa/twinriversdecisionjan2004.pdf · 2005. 1. 23. · uniform application of the laws. Court holds that any exemption of prior condos by law is valid. Yet, courts
Page 30: StarMAnstarman.com/hoa/twinriversdecisionjan2004.pdf · 2005. 1. 23. · uniform application of the laws. Court holds that any exemption of prior condos by law is valid. Yet, courts
admin
Note
constructive notice prevails over express consent to waiver constitutional rights.
Page 31: StarMAnstarman.com/hoa/twinriversdecisionjan2004.pdf · 2005. 1. 23. · uniform application of the laws. Court holds that any exemption of prior condos by law is valid. Yet, courts
admin
Note
adhesion contracts -- court holds covenants are reasonable and therefore canot be unconscionable in spite of unequal bargaining powers between the parties.
Page 32: StarMAnstarman.com/hoa/twinriversdecisionjan2004.pdf · 2005. 1. 23. · uniform application of the laws. Court holds that any exemption of prior condos by law is valid. Yet, courts
Page 33: StarMAnstarman.com/hoa/twinriversdecisionjan2004.pdf · 2005. 1. 23. · uniform application of the laws. Court holds that any exemption of prior condos by law is valid. Yet, courts
Page 34: StarMAnstarman.com/hoa/twinriversdecisionjan2004.pdf · 2005. 1. 23. · uniform application of the laws. Court holds that any exemption of prior condos by law is valid. Yet, courts
Page 35: StarMAnstarman.com/hoa/twinriversdecisionjan2004.pdf · 2005. 1. 23. · uniform application of the laws. Court holds that any exemption of prior condos by law is valid. Yet, courts
Page 36: StarMAnstarman.com/hoa/twinriversdecisionjan2004.pdf · 2005. 1. 23. · uniform application of the laws. Court holds that any exemption of prior condos by law is valid. Yet, courts
Page 37: StarMAnstarman.com/hoa/twinriversdecisionjan2004.pdf · 2005. 1. 23. · uniform application of the laws. Court holds that any exemption of prior condos by law is valid. Yet, courts
Page 38: StarMAnstarman.com/hoa/twinriversdecisionjan2004.pdf · 2005. 1. 23. · uniform application of the laws. Court holds that any exemption of prior condos by law is valid. Yet, courts
Page 39: StarMAnstarman.com/hoa/twinriversdecisionjan2004.pdf · 2005. 1. 23. · uniform application of the laws. Court holds that any exemption of prior condos by law is valid. Yet, courts
Page 40: StarMAnstarman.com/hoa/twinriversdecisionjan2004.pdf · 2005. 1. 23. · uniform application of the laws. Court holds that any exemption of prior condos by law is valid. Yet, courts
Page 41: StarMAnstarman.com/hoa/twinriversdecisionjan2004.pdf · 2005. 1. 23. · uniform application of the laws. Court holds that any exemption of prior condos by law is valid. Yet, courts
Page 42: StarMAnstarman.com/hoa/twinriversdecisionjan2004.pdf · 2005. 1. 23. · uniform application of the laws. Court holds that any exemption of prior condos by law is valid. Yet, courts
Page 43: StarMAnstarman.com/hoa/twinriversdecisionjan2004.pdf · 2005. 1. 23. · uniform application of the laws. Court holds that any exemption of prior condos by law is valid. Yet, courts
Page 44: StarMAnstarman.com/hoa/twinriversdecisionjan2004.pdf · 2005. 1. 23. · uniform application of the laws. Court holds that any exemption of prior condos by law is valid. Yet, courts
Page 45: StarMAnstarman.com/hoa/twinriversdecisionjan2004.pdf · 2005. 1. 23. · uniform application of the laws. Court holds that any exemption of prior condos by law is valid. Yet, courts
Page 46: StarMAnstarman.com/hoa/twinriversdecisionjan2004.pdf · 2005. 1. 23. · uniform application of the laws. Court holds that any exemption of prior condos by law is valid. Yet, courts
Page 47: StarMAnstarman.com/hoa/twinriversdecisionjan2004.pdf · 2005. 1. 23. · uniform application of the laws. Court holds that any exemption of prior condos by law is valid. Yet, courts
Page 48: StarMAnstarman.com/hoa/twinriversdecisionjan2004.pdf · 2005. 1. 23. · uniform application of the laws. Court holds that any exemption of prior condos by law is valid. Yet, courts
Page 49: StarMAnstarman.com/hoa/twinriversdecisionjan2004.pdf · 2005. 1. 23. · uniform application of the laws. Court holds that any exemption of prior condos by law is valid. Yet, courts
Page 50: StarMAnstarman.com/hoa/twinriversdecisionjan2004.pdf · 2005. 1. 23. · uniform application of the laws. Court holds that any exemption of prior condos by law is valid. Yet, courts
Page 51: StarMAnstarman.com/hoa/twinriversdecisionjan2004.pdf · 2005. 1. 23. · uniform application of the laws. Court holds that any exemption of prior condos by law is valid. Yet, courts
Page 52: StarMAnstarman.com/hoa/twinriversdecisionjan2004.pdf · 2005. 1. 23. · uniform application of the laws. Court holds that any exemption of prior condos by law is valid. Yet, courts
Page 53: StarMAnstarman.com/hoa/twinriversdecisionjan2004.pdf · 2005. 1. 23. · uniform application of the laws. Court holds that any exemption of prior condos by law is valid. Yet, courts
Page 54: StarMAnstarman.com/hoa/twinriversdecisionjan2004.pdf · 2005. 1. 23. · uniform application of the laws. Court holds that any exemption of prior condos by law is valid. Yet, courts
Page 55: StarMAnstarman.com/hoa/twinriversdecisionjan2004.pdf · 2005. 1. 23. · uniform application of the laws. Court holds that any exemption of prior condos by law is valid. Yet, courts
Page 56: StarMAnstarman.com/hoa/twinriversdecisionjan2004.pdf · 2005. 1. 23. · uniform application of the laws. Court holds that any exemption of prior condos by law is valid. Yet, courts
Page 57: StarMAnstarman.com/hoa/twinriversdecisionjan2004.pdf · 2005. 1. 23. · uniform application of the laws. Court holds that any exemption of prior condos by law is valid. Yet, courts
Page 58: StarMAnstarman.com/hoa/twinriversdecisionjan2004.pdf · 2005. 1. 23. · uniform application of the laws. Court holds that any exemption of prior condos by law is valid. Yet, courts
Page 59: StarMAnstarman.com/hoa/twinriversdecisionjan2004.pdf · 2005. 1. 23. · uniform application of the laws. Court holds that any exemption of prior condos by law is valid. Yet, courts
Page 60: StarMAnstarman.com/hoa/twinriversdecisionjan2004.pdf · 2005. 1. 23. · uniform application of the laws. Court holds that any exemption of prior condos by law is valid. Yet, courts
Page 61: StarMAnstarman.com/hoa/twinriversdecisionjan2004.pdf · 2005. 1. 23. · uniform application of the laws. Court holds that any exemption of prior condos by law is valid. Yet, courts
Page 62: StarMAnstarman.com/hoa/twinriversdecisionjan2004.pdf · 2005. 1. 23. · uniform application of the laws. Court holds that any exemption of prior condos by law is valid. Yet, courts
Page 63: StarMAnstarman.com/hoa/twinriversdecisionjan2004.pdf · 2005. 1. 23. · uniform application of the laws. Court holds that any exemption of prior condos by law is valid. Yet, courts
Page 64: StarMAnstarman.com/hoa/twinriversdecisionjan2004.pdf · 2005. 1. 23. · uniform application of the laws. Court holds that any exemption of prior condos by law is valid. Yet, courts
Page 65: StarMAnstarman.com/hoa/twinriversdecisionjan2004.pdf · 2005. 1. 23. · uniform application of the laws. Court holds that any exemption of prior condos by law is valid. Yet, courts
Page 66: StarMAnstarman.com/hoa/twinriversdecisionjan2004.pdf · 2005. 1. 23. · uniform application of the laws. Court holds that any exemption of prior condos by law is valid. Yet, courts
Page 67: StarMAnstarman.com/hoa/twinriversdecisionjan2004.pdf · 2005. 1. 23. · uniform application of the laws. Court holds that any exemption of prior condos by law is valid. Yet, courts
Page 68: StarMAnstarman.com/hoa/twinriversdecisionjan2004.pdf · 2005. 1. 23. · uniform application of the laws. Court holds that any exemption of prior condos by law is valid. Yet, courts
Page 69: StarMAnstarman.com/hoa/twinriversdecisionjan2004.pdf · 2005. 1. 23. · uniform application of the laws. Court holds that any exemption of prior condos by law is valid. Yet, courts
Page 70: StarMAnstarman.com/hoa/twinriversdecisionjan2004.pdf · 2005. 1. 23. · uniform application of the laws. Court holds that any exemption of prior condos by law is valid. Yet, courts
Page 71: StarMAnstarman.com/hoa/twinriversdecisionjan2004.pdf · 2005. 1. 23. · uniform application of the laws. Court holds that any exemption of prior condos by law is valid. Yet, courts
Page 72: StarMAnstarman.com/hoa/twinriversdecisionjan2004.pdf · 2005. 1. 23. · uniform application of the laws. Court holds that any exemption of prior condos by law is valid. Yet, courts
Page 73: StarMAnstarman.com/hoa/twinriversdecisionjan2004.pdf · 2005. 1. 23. · uniform application of the laws. Court holds that any exemption of prior condos by law is valid. Yet, courts
Page 74: StarMAnstarman.com/hoa/twinriversdecisionjan2004.pdf · 2005. 1. 23. · uniform application of the laws. Court holds that any exemption of prior condos by law is valid. Yet, courts
Page 75: StarMAnstarman.com/hoa/twinriversdecisionjan2004.pdf · 2005. 1. 23. · uniform application of the laws. Court holds that any exemption of prior condos by law is valid. Yet, courts
Page 76: StarMAnstarman.com/hoa/twinriversdecisionjan2004.pdf · 2005. 1. 23. · uniform application of the laws. Court holds that any exemption of prior condos by law is valid. Yet, courts
Page 77: StarMAnstarman.com/hoa/twinriversdecisionjan2004.pdf · 2005. 1. 23. · uniform application of the laws. Court holds that any exemption of prior condos by law is valid. Yet, courts
Page 78: StarMAnstarman.com/hoa/twinriversdecisionjan2004.pdf · 2005. 1. 23. · uniform application of the laws. Court holds that any exemption of prior condos by law is valid. Yet, courts
Page 79: StarMAnstarman.com/hoa/twinriversdecisionjan2004.pdf · 2005. 1. 23. · uniform application of the laws. Court holds that any exemption of prior condos by law is valid. Yet, courts
Page 80: StarMAnstarman.com/hoa/twinriversdecisionjan2004.pdf · 2005. 1. 23. · uniform application of the laws. Court holds that any exemption of prior condos by law is valid. Yet, courts
Page 81: StarMAnstarman.com/hoa/twinriversdecisionjan2004.pdf · 2005. 1. 23. · uniform application of the laws. Court holds that any exemption of prior condos by law is valid. Yet, courts