2 wave solutions

Upload: pepper100

Post on 29-May-2018

221 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/9/2019 2 Wave Solutions

    1/66

    11

    Advanced Electromagnetic Theory

    Advanced Electromagnetic Theory

    Lecture 2: Wave Equation and its Solutions

    Dimitri PeroulisSchool of Electrical and Computer Engineering

    Birck Nanotechnology Center, Tel: 765 494 3491, [email protected]

  • 8/9/2019 2 Wave Solutions

    2/66

    2

    Constructing Solutionsin Source-Free Media

  • 8/9/2019 2 Wave Solutions

    3/66

    3

    2 ~ E = ~ M i + j ~ J i + 1 q ve + j ~ E 2 ~ E

    Reminder of Wave EquationWave equation for Electric field (from Maxwells eqns):

    Magneticcurrent source

    Electriccurrent source

    Electriccharge

    Source-free wave equation for Electric field:

    2 ~ E = j ~ E 2 ~ E

    2 = j ~ E 2 ~ E = j ( + j ) = + j Propagation constant: Attenuation constant

    Phase constant

    exp( j t)Assumed timedependence

  • 8/9/2019 2 Wave Solutions

    4/66

    4

    A. Lossless media

    Source-free and lossless wave equation for Electric field:

    2 ~ E + 2 ~ E = 0 Helmholtz equation

    2 = k2

    General solution method: Separation of Variables

    Rectangular Cylindrical SphericalUsually:

    Focus of this class

  • 8/9/2019 2 Wave Solutions

    5/66

    5

    1. Rectangular Coordinates~ E (x,y,z ) = ~ax E x (x,y,z ) + ~ay E y (x,y,z ) + ~az E z (x,y,z )

    2

    ~ E + 2

    ~ E = 0 and by using vector identity

    2 ~ E = 2 (~ax E x + ~ay E y + ~az E z ) =

    = ~ax 2E x + ~ay 2E y + ~az 2E z

    only true for rectangular coordinates

    We get:

  • 8/9/2019 2 Wave Solutions

    6/66

    6

    1. Rectangular Coordinates

    2E x (x,y,z ) + 2E x (x,y,z ) = 0 2E y (x,y,z ) + 2E y (x,y,z ) = 0 2E z (x,y,z ) + 2E z (x,y,z ) = 0

    Three scalar Helmholtz equations

    Explicitly:

    E x x

    + E x y

    + E x z

    + 2E x = 0

    Assuming: E x (x,y,z ) = f (x)g(y)h(z)

    Key step: Separation of Variables

  • 8/9/2019 2 Wave Solutions

    7/66

    7

    1. Rectangular Coordinates

    1f

    d2 f dx2

    + 1g

    d2gdy2

    + 1h

    d2hdz2

    + 2 = 0

    Only a function of x

    and:

    Therefore:

    2x

    + 2y

    + 2z

    = 2

    1f

    d2 f dx2 =

    2x

    Only a function

    of x

    1g

    d2gdy2

    = 2yOnly a function

    of y

    1h

    d2hdz2 =

    2z

    Only a function

    of z

  • 8/9/2019 2 Wave Solutions

    8/66

    8

    1. Rectangular CoordinatesSolution (for x, similarly for others):

    f (x) = C 1 cos( x x) + C 2 sin( x x)

    or

    f (x) = C 1 exp( j x x) + C 2 exp( j x x)

    Standing waves

    Wave propagating along positive x axis

    BC BC

    BC BC exp( j t)Assumed timedependenceOpposite for

    exp(

    j t)

    Wave propagating along negative x axis

  • 8/9/2019 2 Wave Solutions

    9/66

    9

    B. Lossy MediaSource-free and lossy wave equation for Electric field:

    2 ~ E 2 ~ E = 0 with

    2

    = j ~ E 2 ~ E = j ( + j ) = + j

    Propagation constant: Attenuation constant

    Phase constant

    = p j ( + j )Choose the sign of the

    square root that yields zerowave amplitude at infinity

    Separation of Variables: 2x

    + 2y

    + 2z

    = 2

  • 8/9/2019 2 Wave Solutions

    10/66

    10

    B. Lossy MediaSolution (for x, similarly for others):

    or

    Standing waves

    Wave propagating along positive x axis

    f (x) = C 1 cosh( x x) + C 2 sinh( x x)

    f (x) = C 1 exp( x x) + C 2 exp( x x)

    Wave propagating along negative x axis

    BC BC

    BC BC exp( j t)Assumed timedependenceOpposite for

    exp(

    j t)

  • 8/9/2019 2 Wave Solutions

    11/66

    11

    Cylindrical Coordinates: Lossless media

    2 ~ E + 2 ~ E = 0

    Helmholtz equation:

    2E +

    E 2

    22

    E +

    2E = 0

    In cylindrical coordinates becomes:

    2E +

    E 2 +

    22

    E +

    2E = 0

    2E z + 2E z = 0 Start from here

    coupled

  • 8/9/2019 2 Wave Solutions

    12/66

    12

    2. Cylindrical Coordinates

    2E z 2

    +1

    E z

    +12

    2E z 2

    + 2E z z2

    + 2E z = 0

    Assuming: E z (, , z) = f ()g()h(z)

    Key step: Separation of Variables

    1f

    d2 f d2 +

    1f

    1

    df d +

    1g

    12

    d2gd2 +

    1h

    d2hdz2 +

    2

    = 0

    Only a function of z

  • 8/9/2019 2 Wave Solutions

    13/66

    13

    2. Cylindrical Coordinates

    Only a function of

    1

    h

    d2h

    dz2 =

    2z

    Thus:

    ord2h

    dz2 =

    2z h

    Putting this back into previous equation:

    2

    f d2 f d2 +

    f

    df d +

    1g

    d2gd2 + 2 2z 2 = 0

    2

    1g

    d2gd2

    = m2

  • 8/9/2019 2 Wave Solutions

    14/66

    14

    2. Cylindrical CoordinatesThus the last equation becomes:

    2d2 f

    d2+

    df

    d+

    2

    2

    m2

    f = 0

    Bessel differential equation

    With the additional equations being:

    d2hdz2

    = 2z h

    d2gd2

    = m2gConstraint equation

    2z + 2 = 2

  • 8/9/2019 2 Wave Solutions

    15/66

    15

    2. Cylindrical CoordinatesFor h:

    or

    Standing waves

    Wave propagating along positive z axis

    h(z) = C 1 cos( z z) + C 2 sin( z z)

    h(z) = C 1 exp( j z z) + C 2 exp( j z z)

    Wave propagating along negative z axis

  • 8/9/2019 2 Wave Solutions

    16/66

    16

    2. Cylindrical CoordinatesFor g:

    or

    periodic waves

    Wave propagating along positive axis

    g() = C 1 cos(m) + C 2 sin(m)

    g() = C 1 exp( jm ) + C 2 exp( jm )

    Wave propagating along negative axis

  • 8/9/2019 2 Wave Solutions

    17/66

    17

    2. Cylindrical CoordinatesFor f:

    or

    standing waves (Bessel functions 1 st and 2 nd kind)

    Wave propagating along positive axis

    f () = C 1J m ( ) + C 2Y m ( )

    Wave propagating along negative axis

    f () = C 1H (2)m ( ) + C 2H (1)m ( )

  • 8/9/2019 2 Wave Solutions

    18/66

    18

    2. Cylindrical CoordinatesReminder:

    H (1)m ( ) = J m ( ) + jY m ( )

    H (2)m ( ) = J m ( ) jY m ( )

    For lossy media the solutions are modified accordingly:

    H (1)m ( ) = H (1)m ( + j )

    J m ( ) = J m ( + j )etc. etc.

  • 8/9/2019 2 Wave Solutions

    19/66

    19

    Constructing SolutionsWhen Sources are Known

  • 8/9/2019 2 Wave Solutions

    20/66

    20

    Constructing Solutions

    1. Elementary approach: Vector Potentials

    2. Greens functions

    a. ~ A and ~ F

    b. ~ e = j ~ A and ~ h = j ~ F

    sources FieldsDirect integrationGreens functions

    Integration Potentials Differentiation

    Hertz Potentials

  • 8/9/2019 2 Wave Solutions

    21/66

    21

    Vector PotentialsReminder:

    2 ~ E = ~ M + j ~ J + 1 q ve + j ~ E 2 ~ E

    2 ~ E +

    2 ~ E =

    ~ M + j

    ~ J +

    1

    q ve

    which for lossless media becomes:

    0

    and similarly for the magnetic field:

    2 ~ H + 2 ~ H = ~ J + j ~ M + 1 q vm

  • 8/9/2019 2 Wave Solutions

    22/66

    22

    Vector PotentialsWe will solve these by superposition:

    1. First, assume that no magnetic sources exist

    and find the solution. We will call these fields:

    2. Second, assume that no electric sources existand find the solution. We will call these fields:

    ~ E A and ~ H A

    ~ E F and ~ H F

  • 8/9/2019 2 Wave Solutions

    23/66

    23

    Vector Potentials: No magnetic sources1. No magnetic sources exist:

    ~ BA = 0 thus ~ BA = ~ A

    Reminder: Both the curl and divergence need to bedefined for a unique definition of the magnetic vector

    potential. This will be done shortly.

    So for a simple (linear, isotropic and homogeneous)medium we get:

    ~ H A =1

    ~ BA =1 ~ A

  • 8/9/2019 2 Wave Solutions

    24/66

    24

    Vector Potentials: No magnetic sources

    We get:

    h~ E A + j ~ Ai= 0Can be written as: ~ E A + j ~ A = e

    So going into Faradays law:

    ~ E A = j ~ H A

    ~ H A =1 ~ A

    ~ E A = e j ~ A

  • 8/9/2019 2 Wave Solutions

    25/66

    25

    Vector Potentials: No magnetic sourcesIn order to find the two potentials we need the otherequation (Ampere-Maxwell)

    ~ H A = ~ J + j ~ E A

    1 ~ A= ~ J + j ~ E APlug in the magnetic field

    Which for simple media becomes:

    ~ A = ~ J + j ~ E A ~ A = ( ~ A) 2 ~ A

  • 8/9/2019 2 Wave Solutions

    26/66

    26

    Vector Potentials: No magnetic sources

    This reduces to:

    2 ~ A + 2 ~ A = ~ J +

    h ~ A + j e

    iWe can define the divergence freely (Lorentz gauge)

    0

    Thus the equation that needs to be solved is:

    2 ~ A + 2 ~ A = ~ J

    Furthermore:

    ~ E A = e j ~ A = j ~ A j1

    ( ~ A)

  • 8/9/2019 2 Wave Solutions

    27/66

    27

    Vector Potentials: No magnetic sources

    In order to solve this consideran infinitesimal point sourcein V around the origin

    ~ J = J z~az

    For any point except for the origin (source):

    2Az (r ) + 2Az (r ) = 0

    Due to symmetry:

    ~ A = Az (r )~az and / = 0 , / = 0

  • 8/9/2019 2 Wave Solutions

    28/66

    28

    Vector Potentials: No magnetic sources

    which by taking into account the symmetry argumentsreduces to

    d2

    Az (r )dr 2 + 2r dAz (r )dr +

    2Az (r ) = 0

    This equation has two independent solutions:

    Az 1(r ) = C 1 exp( j r )/r

    Az 2(r ) = C 2 exp( j r )/rWe will learn how to find them onlywhen we do Greens functions

    Outward wave

    Inward wave

  • 8/9/2019 2 Wave Solutions

    29/66

    29

    Vector Potentials: No magnetic sources

    Reminder:

    2

    =

    q/ =1 Z V

    q 4 r dv

    0

    2Az = J z Az =

    Z V J z

    4

    r

    dv0

    When = 0 ( statics) the equation and solutions become:

    2Az = J z , Az (r ) = C 1 /rC 1 /r

    Instead of

    C 1 exp( j r )/r

    Thus by analogy: Az = Z V J zexp( j r )

    4 rdv0

  • 8/9/2019 2 Wave Solutions

    30/66

    30

    Vector Potentials: No magnetic sources

    If we do the same along the x and y directions:

    Ax =

    Z V J x

    exp( j r )

    4 rdv0

    Ay =

    Z V J y

    exp( j r )

    4 rdv0

    Thus for an arbitrary point source at the origin:

    ~ A = Z V ~ J exp( j r )

    4 rdv0

  • 8/9/2019 2 Wave Solutions

    31/66

    31

    Vector Potentials: No magnetic sources

    The truth is that although this solution is correct, it isfull of hand-weaving arguments. When we learn Greensfunctions we will find out how to properly solve it.

    Intuitively if the sourceis not at the origin:

    ~ A = Z V ~ J (r 0) exp( j |r r 0|)4 | r r 0| dv0

    Later identify asfree-space Greensfunction in 3D

  • 8/9/2019 2 Wave Solutions

    32/66

    32

    Vector Potentials: No magnetic sources

    To recap, for cases with no magnetic sources

    ~ A = Z V ~ J (r 0) exp( j |r r0

    |)4 |r r 0| dv0

    ~ H A =1

    ~ A

    ~ E A = j ~ A j1

    ( ~ A) or ~ E A =

    1 j

    ~ H A

  • 8/9/2019 2 Wave Solutions

    33/66

    33

    Vector Potentials: No electric sources

    2. No magnetic sources exist:

    ~ D F = 0 thus ~ D F = ~ F

    Reminder: Both the curl and divergence need to bedefined for a unique definition of the magnetic vector

    potential. This will be done shortly.So for a simple (linear, isotropic and homogeneous)medium we get:

    ~ E F = 1 ~ F

  • 8/9/2019 2 Wave Solutions

    34/66

    34

    Vector Potentials: No electric sources

    So going into Ampere-Maxwells law:

    ~ H F = j ~ E F ~ E F = 1

    ~ F We get:

    h~ H F + j ~ F i= 0Can be written as: ~ H F + j ~ F = m

    ~ H F = m j ~ F

  • 8/9/2019 2 Wave Solutions

    35/66

    35

    Vector Potentials: No electric sources

    In order to find the two potentials we need the otherequation (Faraday)

    ~ E F = ~ M j ~ H F

    1 ~ F = ~ M j ~ H F Plug in the electric field

    Which for simple media becomes:

    ~ F = ~ M + j ~ H F ~ F = ( ~ F ) 2 ~ F

  • 8/9/2019 2 Wave Solutions

    36/66

    36

    Vector Potentials: No electric sources

    This reduces to:

    2 ~ F + 2 ~ F = ~ M +

    h ~ F + j m

    iWe can define the divergence freely (Lorentz gauge)

    0

    Thus the equation that needs to be solved is:

    2 ~ F + 2 ~ F = ~ M

    Furthermore:

    ~ H F = m j ~ F = j ~ F j1

    ( ~ F )

  • 8/9/2019 2 Wave Solutions

    37/66

    37

    Vector Potentials: No electric sources

    As we did for the magnetic vector potential:

    ~ F = Z V

    ~ M (r 0)exp( j |r r 0|)

    4 | r r 0|dv0

    ~ E F = 1 ~ F

    ~ H F = j

    ~ F j

    1 (

    ~ F ) or

    ~ H F =

    1 j

    ~ E F

    And therefore the total fields are:

    ~ E = ~ E A + ~ E F ~ H = ~ H A + ~ H F

    i h G i i l

  • 8/9/2019 2 Wave Solutions

    38/66

    38

    With Greens Functions not rigorously

    In general a Greens function characterizes the responseof a system due to a point source

    Point source Greens function

    Actual source Superposition of point sources

    The Greens function can be scalar, vector or dyadic

    Wi h G F i i l

  • 8/9/2019 2 Wave Solutions

    39/66

    39

    With Greens Functions not rigorously

    A dyad is a juxtaposition of two vectors

    D = ~ A ~ B =

    Ax Bx Ax By Ax B zAy Bx Ay By Ay BzAz Bx Az By Az B z

    ~ A = Ax~ax + Ay~ay + Az~az~ B = Bx~ax + By~ay + Bz~az

    Then

    Ifand

    which can be thought as a matrix as well

    Wi h G F i i l

  • 8/9/2019 2 Wave Solutions

    40/66

    40

    With Greens Functions not rigorously

    For example look at the following vector identity:

    ~ B ( ~ A ~ C ) = ~ A ~ B ~ C ~ B ~ A ~ C

    number number

    Or:

    ~ B ( ~ A ~ C ) = ~ A ~ B ~ C ~ B ~ A ~ C

    dyad dyad

    With G F ti t i l

  • 8/9/2019 2 Wave Solutions

    41/66

    41

    With Greens Functions not rigorously

    Similarly:

    ~ E = ~ E 2 ~ E

    divergence

    gradient of divergenceOr:

    ~ E = ~ E 2

    ~ E

    dyadic operator

  • 8/9/2019 2 Wave Solutions

    42/66

    With Greens Functions not rigorously

  • 8/9/2019 2 Wave Solutions

    43/66

    43

    With Greens Functions not rigorously

    The solution can be thought as

    ~ E (~r) = j

    R V G(~r, ~r

    0) ~ J (~r 0) dv0

    Dyadic Greens function

    Plug this in to the wave equation:

    j

    Z V G(~r, ~r 0 ) ~ J (~r 0 ) dv0

    2

    j

    ZV

    G(~r, ~r 0 ) ~ J (~r 0 ) dv0 = j ~ J

    Source point

    Observation point

    With Greens Functions not rigorously

  • 8/9/2019 2 Wave Solutions

    44/66

    44

    With Green s Functions not rigorously

    The current on the right-hand side can be written as

    ~ J (~r) = Z V I ~ J (~r 0) (~r ~r 0) dv0

    Plugging this in to the previous equation we get:

    Unit dyad: I =

    1 0 0

    0 1 00 0 1

    With Greens Functions not rigorously

  • 8/9/2019 2 Wave Solutions

    45/66

    45

    With Green s Functions not rigorously

    j Z V G(~r, ~r 0) ~ J (~r 0) dv0 2 j Z V G(~r, ~r 0) ~ J (~r 0) dv0

    = j Z V I ~ J (~r 0) (~r ~r 0) dv0If we interchange differentiation with integration,which is valid only outside of the source regionwhich is valid only outside of the source region, we get:

    With Greens Functions not rigorously

  • 8/9/2019 2 Wave Solutions

    46/66

    46

    With Green s Functions not rigorously

    G(~r, ~r 0 ) 2 G(~r, ~r 0 ) = I (~r ~r 0 )

    Reminder: observation point is away from the source

    We write the dyadic Greens function in terms of a scalarone:

    G(~r, ~r 0 ) =

    I +

    1

    2

    g(~r, ~r 0 )

    and plug it in the above equation:

  • 8/9/2019 2 Wave Solutions

    47/66

    With Greens Functions not rigorously

  • 8/9/2019 2 Wave Solutions

    48/66

    48

    With Green s Functions not rigorously

    2 + 2

    g(~r, ~r 0 ) = (~r ~r 0 )

    We obtain:

    Scalar 3D Greens function equation

    To solve this we follow an approach very similar towhat we have already seen for the magnetic potential:

    First set: ~r0

    = 0and observe that is spherically symmetricg(~r )

  • 8/9/2019 2 Wave Solutions

    49/66

    With Greens Functions not rigorously

  • 8/9/2019 2 Wave Solutions

    50/66

    50

    With Green s Functions not rigorously

    There are two exponential solutions to this equationbut we only accept the one representing the outgoingwave:

    g(r ) = C exp(

    j r )r

    The constant is found by integrating the differentialequation on an infinitesimally small sphere around theorigin:

    Z V 2g(~r ) dv +

    2

    Z V g(~r ) dv = Z V (~r ) dvV 0with

    With Greens Functions not rigorously

  • 8/9/2019 2 Wave Solutions

    51/66

    51

    Z V

    2g(~r) dv =

    Z S g(~r) ~ dS

    = 4 a2

    dg(r )

    dr r = a= 4 C as a 0

    With Green s Functions not rigorously

    The first integral becomes with Divergence Theorem:

    radius of the sphere

    With Greens Functions not rigorously

  • 8/9/2019 2 Wave Solutions

    52/66

    52

    With Green s Functions not rigorously

    The second integral becomes:

    Z V g(~r) dv = Z a

    0 4 r2g(r ) dr = 0 as a 0

    The third integral becomes:

    Z V (~r ) dv = 1

    With Greens Functions not rigorously

  • 8/9/2019 2 Wave Solutions

    53/66

    53

    W g y

    Putting all together we find:

    C =1

    4 and g(r ) =exp( j r )

    4 r

    Since r is the distance between the source and theobservation points, if the source is not at the originwe get:

    g(r, r 0) = exp( j |r r0|)

    4 |r r 0|Reminder: observationpoint is away fromthe source region

    With Greens Functions not rigorously

  • 8/9/2019 2 Wave Solutions

    54/66

    54

    g y

    So now we can find the electric field:

    ~ E (~r) = j Z V G(~r, ~r 0) ~ J (~r 0) dv0= j I +

    1 2 Z V g(~r, ~r 0) ~ J (~r 0) dv0

    = j

    I +

    1

    2

    Z V e( j | r r

    0 | )

    4 |r r 0|~ J (~r 0) dv0

    to emphasize thatintegration is overprimed coordinates

    Del operators operate on unprimed coordinates

    Example: Cerenkov Radiation

  • 8/9/2019 2 Wave Solutions

    55/66

    55

    p

    Advanced Test Reactor inIdaho National Laboratory (250 MW) Cobalt-60 (medical) Plutonium-238 (space probes)

    Reed Research Reactor inReed College, Portland, OR(250 kW)

    From wikipedia

    Electromagnetic radiation emitted when a charged particle(such as an electron) passes through an insulator at a speedgreater than the speed of light in that medium.

    Nobel prize1958

    Example: Cerenkov Radiation

  • 8/9/2019 2 Wave Solutions

    56/66

    56

    p

    Main Characteristics:Velocity of electronsmust be very large

    Angles of radiationdepend on the electronvelocity

    Electric fieldpolarization of emittedlight is parallel to the

    plane determined by thedirection of the beamand direction of theradiation

    While the electrons reachrelativistic speeds (~0.75 c ),we can explain it with what weknow so far!

    Photonic shock wave!

    Example: Cerenkov Radiation

  • 8/9/2019 2 Wave Solutions

    57/66

    57

    p

    While the velocity decreases as a result of radiation,we will assume it constant.

    Assume particle with charge q moving withvelocity v along the z direction in an isotropicmedium. This is equivalent to a current density:

    ~ J (~r, t ) = ~az qv (x) (y) (z vt)

    Because of cylindrical symmetry it is convenient totransform this to cylindrical coordinates

    Example: Cerenkov Radiation

  • 8/9/2019 2 Wave Solutions

    58/66

    58

    ~ J (~r, t ) = ~az qv (x) (y) (z vt)

    Due to symmetry, we would like to write it as:

    ~ J (~r, t ) = ~az C qv () (z vt)

    The constant is determined by the requirement to havethe same total current as with the previous expression:

    Example: Cerenkov Radiation

  • 8/9/2019 2 Wave Solutions

    59/66

    59

    1 =

    Z +

    Z +

    (x) (y)dxdy =

    = Z 2

    0Z

    0

    (x) (y)dd = Z

    0

    (x) (y)2 d

    Thus:

    1 = Z

    0 ()d

    and since:

    Example: Cerenkov Radiation

  • 8/9/2019 2 Wave Solutions

    60/66

    60

    (x) (y) = ()

    2

    we get:

    So the current in cylindrical coordinates becomes:

    ~ J (~r, t ) = ~az qv1

    2 () (z vt)

    Example: Cerenkov Radiation

  • 8/9/2019 2 Wave Solutions

    61/66

    61

    This source is not time harmonic. So we need to usethe Fourier transform:

    ~ J (~r, ) =1

    2 Z

    ~ J (~r, t )e

    j t dt = ~azq

    4 2 e(

    j z/v ) ()

    Thus the electric field wave equation becomes:

    ~ E (~r) 2 ~ E (~r) = j ~ J (~r)

    = ~az j q 4 2

    e( j z/v ) ()

    Example: Cerenkov Radiation

  • 8/9/2019 2 Wave Solutions

    62/66

    62

    The most convenient way to solve this is to write theelectric field as a function of a vector Greens function:

    ~ E (~r ) = I + 1 2 ~g(, z)= ~g(, z) +

    1

    2 [ ~g(, z)]

    Plugging this into the electric field vector equation

    we get:

    Example: Cerenkov Radiation

  • 8/9/2019 2 Wave Solutions

    63/66

    63

    2 + 2~g(, z) = ~az jq

    4 2e( j z/v ) ()

    Because of the azimuthal symmetry of the problem, wecan write the Greens function as:

    ~g(, z) = ~az g() j q

    2e( j z/v )

    Then the previous equation becomes:

    Example: Cerenkov Radiation

  • 8/9/2019 2 Wave Solutions

    64/66

    64

    1 dd dd 2v2 + 2g() = ()2Away from the origin this equation becomes:

    1 dd dd+ 2g() = 0where: = r 2 2v2

  • 8/9/2019 2 Wave Solutions

    65/66

    Example: Cerenkov Radiation

  • 8/9/2019 2 Wave Solutions

    66/66

    66

    ~ E (~ ) 'q

    8 s 2 j h~a

    v

    ~az

    ie j ( + z/v )

    Propagating plane wave provided that is real

    All that Cerenkov observed is now explained:

    is real if or

    rest in hw

    2 > 2 /v 2 v >

    1

    1/ 2

    =c

    n