Upload File

2: ease the transition, remove implementation barriers...bottleneck, you unlock the next one. in the...

  • Home
  • Documents
  • 2: Ease the Transition, Remove Implementation Barriers...bottleneck, you unlock the next one. In the case of HTTP/2, TCP may be it. Which is why, once again, a well-tuned TCP stack
69

Upload: others

Post on 15-Aug-2020

4 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

Report

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 2: Ease the Transition, Remove Implementation Barriers...bottleneck, you unlock the next one. In the case of HTTP/2, TCP may be it. Which is why, once again, a well-tuned TCP stack
Page 2: 2: Ease the Transition, Remove Implementation Barriers...bottleneck, you unlock the next one. In the case of HTTP/2, TCP may be it. Which is why, once again, a well-tuned TCP stack

HTTP/2: Ease the Transition, Remove Implementation BarriersRobert Haynes Ronnie Dockery

Page 3: 2: Ease the Transition, Remove Implementation Barriers...bottleneck, you unlock the next one. In the case of HTTP/2, TCP may be it. Which is why, once again, a well-tuned TCP stack

© 2016 F5 Networks

No One Likes Slow

3

Page 4: 2: Ease the Transition, Remove Implementation Barriers...bottleneck, you unlock the next one. In the case of HTTP/2, TCP may be it. Which is why, once again, a well-tuned TCP stack

© 2016 F5 Networks

No One Likes Slow

74% of users will leave a slow website after just 5 seconds or less

3

Page 5: 2: Ease the Transition, Remove Implementation Barriers...bottleneck, you unlock the next one. In the case of HTTP/2, TCP may be it. Which is why, once again, a well-tuned TCP stack

© 2016 F5 Networks

No One Likes Slow

74% of users will leave a slow website after just 5 seconds or less

Slow application:

Reduced productivity

3

Page 6: 2: Ease the Transition, Remove Implementation Barriers...bottleneck, you unlock the next one. In the case of HTTP/2, TCP may be it. Which is why, once again, a well-tuned TCP stack

© 2016 F5 Networks

No One Likes Slow

74% of users will leave a slow website after just 5 seconds or less

Every 100 millisecond delay costs Amazon 1% in

sales

Slow application:

Reduced productivity

3

Page 7: 2: Ease the Transition, Remove Implementation Barriers...bottleneck, you unlock the next one. In the case of HTTP/2, TCP may be it. Which is why, once again, a well-tuned TCP stack

© 2016 F5 Networks

Things Are Not Getting Easier

4

Page 8: 2: Ease the Transition, Remove Implementation Barriers...bottleneck, you unlock the next one. In the case of HTTP/2, TCP may be it. Which is why, once again, a well-tuned TCP stack

© 2016 F5 Networks

Things Are Not Getting Easier

Mobile devices of global now account for Internet traffic 35%

010203040

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2015

4

Page 9: 2: Ease the Transition, Remove Implementation Barriers...bottleneck, you unlock the next one. In the case of HTTP/2, TCP may be it. Which is why, once again, a well-tuned TCP stack

© 2016 F5 Networks

Things Are Not Getting Easier

The average web page has grown since 2008 3× 2.1MB

Growing exponentially

Mobile devices of global now account for Internet traffic 35%

010203040

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2015

4

Page 10: 2: Ease the Transition, Remove Implementation Barriers...bottleneck, you unlock the next one. In the case of HTTP/2, TCP may be it. Which is why, once again, a well-tuned TCP stack

© 2016 F5 Networks

Things Are Not Getting Easier

The average web page has grown since 2008 3× 2.1MB

Growing exponentially

Mobile devices of global now account for Internet traffic 35%

010203040

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2015

Radio = Latency

FiberCable

LTE 34% mostly use mobile Internet

4

Page 11: 2: Ease the Transition, Remove Implementation Barriers...bottleneck, you unlock the next one. In the case of HTTP/2, TCP may be it. Which is why, once again, a well-tuned TCP stack

© 2016 F5 Networks

2015 2016

COMPRESSION 12% 21%

ACCELERATION 12% 25%

SSL OFFLOAD 9% 21%

CACHING 9% 19%

Addressing Performance ChallengesF5 survey shows growth in plans to deploy performance-related services

5

Page 12: 2: Ease the Transition, Remove Implementation Barriers...bottleneck, you unlock the next one. In the case of HTTP/2, TCP may be it. Which is why, once again, a well-tuned TCP stack

© 2016 F5 Networks

Static content Small objects Low number of objects

HTTP Timeline

1996

HTTP/1.0

6

Page 13: 2: Ease the Transition, Remove Implementation Barriers...bottleneck, you unlock the next one. In the case of HTTP/2, TCP may be it. Which is why, once again, a well-tuned TCP stack

© 2016 F5 Networks

1 request = 1 connection Connection setup is expensive Inefficient when large numbers of objects on page Mitigated in part with keep-alive

What Were the Issues with HTTP/1?

7

Page 14: 2: Ease the Transition, Remove Implementation Barriers...bottleneck, you unlock the next one. In the case of HTTP/2, TCP may be it. Which is why, once again, a well-tuned TCP stack

© 2016 F5 Networks

www.cats.com

www.dogs.com

?

What Were the Issues with HTTP/1?

No virtual host support Each site needs one IP address Inefficient use of addresses Multi-homing server limits (255 per server on Linux < 2.2 kernel)

8

Page 15: 2: Ease the Transition, Remove Implementation Barriers...bottleneck, you unlock the next one. In the case of HTTP/2, TCP may be it. Which is why, once again, a well-tuned TCP stack

© 2016 F5 Networks

What Were the Issues with HTTP/1?

Primitive caching Cache invalidation used absolute times Clock skew caused problems Not explicit enough

9

Page 16: 2: Ease the Transition, Remove Implementation Barriers...bottleneck, you unlock the next one. In the case of HTTP/2, TCP may be it. Which is why, once again, a well-tuned TCP stack

© 2016 F5 Networks

Dynamic content Bigger objects More objects

HTTP Timeline

1996

HTTP/1.0

1999

HTTP/1.1

10

Page 17: 2: Ease the Transition, Remove Implementation Barriers...bottleneck, you unlock the next one. In the case of HTTP/2, TCP may be it. Which is why, once again, a well-tuned TCP stack

© 2016 F5 Networks

1996: HTTP/1.1

Cache-control header

Max-age directive

Etag header

Default = all connections

No keepalive messages

Servers still have timeouts

CACHING PERSISTENT CONNECTIONS

VIRTUAL HOSTS

Host header now required Multiple sites one IP address

11

Page 18: 2: Ease the Transition, Remove Implementation Barriers...bottleneck, you unlock the next one. In the case of HTTP/2, TCP may be it. Which is why, once again, a well-tuned TCP stack

© 2016 F5 Networks

What Are the Issues with HTTP/1.1?

Requests are blocking One connection can only process one request at a time Slow object blocks others downloading Solution—multiple connections

12

Page 19: 2: Ease the Transition, Remove Implementation Barriers...bottleneck, you unlock the next one. In the case of HTTP/2, TCP may be it. Which is why, once again, a well-tuned TCP stack

© 2016 F5 Networks

What Are the Issues with HTTP/1.1?

.css

/images/

HTML

Workarounds can be counter productive Multi-origin websites cause clients to open up to 30 TCP connections

13

Page 20: 2: Ease the Transition, Remove Implementation Barriers...bottleneck, you unlock the next one. In the case of HTTP/2, TCP may be it. Which is why, once again, a well-tuned TCP stack

© 2016 F5 Networks

meowmewomeowmeowmeowmeowmeowmeowmeoMeowmewomeowmeowmeowmeowmeowmeowmeomeowmewomeowmeowmeowmeowmeowmeowmeoMeowmewomeowmeowmeowmeowmeowmeowmeomeowmewomeowmeowmeowmeowmeowmeowmeoMeowmewmeowmewomeowmeowmeowmeowmeowmeowmeoMeowmewomeowmeowmeowmeowmeowmeowmeomeowmewomeowmeowmeowmeowmeowmeowmeoMeowmewomeowmeowmeowmeowmeowmeowmeomeowmewomeowmeowmeowmeowmeowmeowmeoMeowmewomeowmeowmeowmeowmeowmeowmewoofmeow

Header Data

Not that efficient Headers not compressed Header numbers and size increasing

What Are the Issues with HTTP/1.1?

14

Page 21: 2: Ease the Transition, Remove Implementation Barriers...bottleneck, you unlock the next one. In the case of HTTP/2, TCP may be it. Which is why, once again, a well-tuned TCP stack

© 2016 F5 Networks

Video content User-generated content

HTTP Timeline

Hey Nice Cat!

His name is Mittens.

1996

HTTP/1.0

1999

HTTP/1.1

2004

YouTube

15

Page 22: 2: Ease the Transition, Remove Implementation Barriers...bottleneck, you unlock the next one. In the case of HTTP/2, TCP may be it. Which is why, once again, a well-tuned TCP stack

© 2016 F5 Networks

More objects Bigger objects Mobile devices

HTTP Timeline

1996

HTTP/1.0

1999

HTTP/1.1

2004

YouTube

2009

SPDY

16

Page 23: 2: Ease the Transition, Remove Implementation Barriers...bottleneck, you unlock the next one. In the case of HTTP/2, TCP may be it. Which is why, once again, a well-tuned TCP stack

© 2016 F5 Networks

2009: SPDY

Concurrent requests

Single connection

(More on this later)

Reduced header overhead

Smaller page size

Multiplexed Requests Compressed Headers Requires TLS

Enforced SSL security (Whether you want it or not)

17

Page 24: 2: Ease the Transition, Remove Implementation Barriers...bottleneck, you unlock the next one. In the case of HTTP/2, TCP may be it. Which is why, once again, a well-tuned TCP stack

© 2016 F5 Networks

What Are the Issues with SPDY?Not a standard

Forced secure connections (TLS)

Maybe not as SPDY? (depending on who you listen to)

Insecure compression

18

Page 25: 2: Ease the Transition, Remove Implementation Barriers...bottleneck, you unlock the next one. In the case of HTTP/2, TCP may be it. Which is why, once again, a well-tuned TCP stack

© 2016 F5 Networks

1996

HTTP/1.0

1999

HTTP/1.1

2004

YouTube

2009

SPDY

2015

HTTP/2

HTTP/2 Timeline

RFC 7540 May 2015

19

Page 26: 2: Ease the Transition, Remove Implementation Barriers...bottleneck, you unlock the next one. In the case of HTTP/2, TCP may be it. Which is why, once again, a well-tuned TCP stack

© 2016 F5 Networks

Multi-plexed requests

"Safe" compression

TLS optional*

Stronger cryptography

2015: HTTP/2 Is Here!

* Not in practice

20

Page 27: 2: Ease the Transition, Remove Implementation Barriers...bottleneck, you unlock the next one. In the case of HTTP/2, TCP may be it. Which is why, once again, a well-tuned TCP stack

© 2016 F5 Networks

Multi-plexed requests

"Safe" compression

TLS optional*

Stronger cryptography

2015: HTTP/2 Is Here!

* Not in practice

20

Page 28: 2: Ease the Transition, Remove Implementation Barriers...bottleneck, you unlock the next one. In the case of HTTP/2, TCP may be it. Which is why, once again, a well-tuned TCP stack

© 2016 F5 Networks

HTTP/2 Adoption

Data from http://isthewebhttp2yet.com/measurements/adoption.html

21

Page 29: 2: Ease the Transition, Remove Implementation Barriers...bottleneck, you unlock the next one. In the case of HTTP/2, TCP may be it. Which is why, once again, a well-tuned TCP stack

© 2016 F5 Networks

HTTP/2 Adoption

7.8% of sites

Data from https://w3techs.com/technologies/details/ce-http2/all/all

Most “webmonsters”

22

Page 30: 2: Ease the Transition, Remove Implementation Barriers...bottleneck, you unlock the next one. In the case of HTTP/2, TCP may be it. Which is why, once again, a well-tuned TCP stack

HTTP/2—Quick Overview

Page 31: 2: Ease the Transition, Remove Implementation Barriers...bottleneck, you unlock the next one. In the case of HTTP/2, TCP may be it. Which is why, once again, a well-tuned TCP stack

© 2016 F5 Networks

3 Shocking Facts About HTTP/2 Everyone Should Know

It’s binary

It uses multi-plexed requests on a single connection

It uses compressed headers

24

Page 32: 2: Ease the Transition, Remove Implementation Barriers...bottleneck, you unlock the next one. In the case of HTTP/2, TCP may be it. Which is why, once again, a well-tuned TCP stack

© 2016 F5 Networks

3 Shocking Facts About HTTP/2 Everyone Should Know

It uses multi-plexed requests on a single connection

It uses compressed headers

01101001 01110100 00100111 01110011 00100b00 01100010 01101001 01101110 01100001 01110010 01111001 00001010

24

Page 33: 2: Ease the Transition, Remove Implementation Barriers...bottleneck, you unlock the next one. In the case of HTTP/2, TCP may be it. Which is why, once again, a well-tuned TCP stack

© 2016 F5 Networks

3 Shocking Facts About HTTP/2 Everyone Should Know

It uses compressed headers

01101001 01110100 00100111 01110011 00100b00 01100010 01101001 01101110 01100001 01110010 01111001 00001010

01000111 01000101 01010100 00100000 00101111 01101001 01101101 01100001 01100111 01100101 01110011 00101111 01100011 01100001 01110100 00101110 01101010 01110000 01100111 01000111 01000101 01010100 00100000 00101111 01101001 01101101 01100001 01100111 01100101 01110011 00101111 01100100 01101111 01100111 00001101 00001010 00101110 01101010 01110000 01100111 01000111 01000101 01010100 00100000 00101111 01101001 01101101 01100001 01100111 01100101 01110011 00101111 01110100 01110101 01110010 01110100 01101100 01100101 00101110 01101010 01110000 01100111

24

Page 34: 2: Ease the Transition, Remove Implementation Barriers...bottleneck, you unlock the next one. In the case of HTTP/2, TCP may be it. Which is why, once again, a well-tuned TCP stack

© 2016 F5 Networks

3 Shocking Facts About HTTP/2 Everyone Should Know

01101001 01110100 00100111 01110011 00100b00 01100010 01101001 01101110 01100001 01110010 01111001 00001010

It uses compressed headers

01000111 01000101 01010100 00100000 00101111 01101001 01101101 01100001 01100111 01100101 01110011 00101111 01100011 01100001 01110100 00101110 01101010 01110000 01100111 01000111 01000101 01010100 00100000 00101111 01101001 01101101 01100001 01100111 01100101 01110011 00101111 01100100 01101111 01100111 00001101 00001010 00101110 01101010 01110000 01100111 01000111 01000101 01010100 00100000 00101111 01101001 01101101 01100001 01100111 01100101 01110011 00101111 01110100 01110101 01110010 01110100 01101100 01100101 00101110 01101010 01110000 01100111

24

Page 35: 2: Ease the Transition, Remove Implementation Barriers...bottleneck, you unlock the next one. In the case of HTTP/2, TCP may be it. Which is why, once again, a well-tuned TCP stack

© 2016 F5 Networks

A major contributor to improved HTTP/2 performance

Multi-plexed Requests

25

Page 36: 2: Ease the Transition, Remove Implementation Barriers...bottleneck, you unlock the next one. In the case of HTTP/2, TCP may be it. Which is why, once again, a well-tuned TCP stack

© 2016 F5 Networks

A major contributor to improved HTTP/2 performance

Multiple outstanding requests per connection

Uses a construct known as "streams"

Max number of streams is configurable

BIG-IP default is typically 10—probably too low

Multi-plexed Requests

25

Page 37: 2: Ease the Transition, Remove Implementation Barriers...bottleneck, you unlock the next one. In the case of HTTP/2, TCP may be it. Which is why, once again, a well-tuned TCP stack

© 2016 F5 Networks

HTTP/1.1

26

Page 38: 2: Ease the Transition, Remove Implementation Barriers...bottleneck, you unlock the next one. In the case of HTTP/2, TCP may be it. Which is why, once again, a well-tuned TCP stack

© 2016 F5 Networks

Hello

May I have a picture of a cat please?

Here is a cat

May I also have a picture of a dog?

Here is a dog

May I also have a picture of a turtle?

Here is a turtle

Thanks, bye

Bye

HTTP/1.1Hello

26

Page 39: 2: Ease the Transition, Remove Implementation Barriers...bottleneck, you unlock the next one. In the case of HTTP/2, TCP may be it. Which is why, once again, a well-tuned TCP stack

© 2016 F5 Networks

Hello

May I have a picture of a cat please?

Here is a cat

May I also have a picture of a dog?

Here is a dog

May I also have a picture of a turtle?

Here is a turtle

Thanks, bye

Bye

Hello

Hello

May I have a picture of a cat please? And another cat? And a dog?

Here is a cat And a dog

May I also have a picture of a turtle?

Here is another cat And a turtle

Thanks, bye

Bye

HTTP/1.1 HTTP/2Hello

26

Page 40: 2: Ease the Transition, Remove Implementation Barriers...bottleneck, you unlock the next one. In the case of HTTP/2, TCP may be it. Which is why, once again, a well-tuned TCP stack

© 2016 F5 Networks

Most headers are the same between requests Why send them every time?

Just keep a header table on each side of the connection

Update only what has changed in each stream

Method GETscheme HTTPShost F5.compath /resourceAccept image/jpeg

user-agent Mozilla/5.0 …

Method GETscheme HTTPShost F5.compath /imagesaccept image/jpeg

user-agent Mozilla/5.0 …

Request 1 Request 2

method: Get scheme: HTTPS host: f5.com path: /resource accept: image/jpg user-agent: Mozilla/….

Stream 1 headers

Method: Get Scheme: HTTPS Host: f5.com path: /images Accept: image/jpg User-agent: Mozilla/….

Stream 2 headers

Compression for Headers

27

Page 41: 2: Ease the Transition, Remove Implementation Barriers...bottleneck, you unlock the next one. In the case of HTTP/2, TCP may be it. Which is why, once again, a well-tuned TCP stack

© 2016 F5 Networks

100 images 100 milliseconds (added) latency Served from Microsoft Azure

Page load 18 seconds

HTTP/1.1

One hundred requests: HTTP/1: Browser limited to six simultaneous requests

28

Page 42: 2: Ease the Transition, Remove Implementation Barriers...bottleneck, you unlock the next one. In the case of HTTP/2, TCP may be it. Which is why, once again, a well-tuned TCP stack

© 2016 F5 Networks

100 images 100 milliseconds (added) latency Served from Microsoft Azure

Page load 5 seconds

HTTP/2One hundred requests: HTTP/2: Browser can request more than six simultaneous requests

29

Page 43: 2: Ease the Transition, Remove Implementation Barriers...bottleneck, you unlock the next one. In the case of HTTP/2, TCP may be it. Which is why, once again, a well-tuned TCP stack

© 2016 F5 Networks

Ephemeral keys only (forward secrecy)

Stronger Cryptography

30

Page 44: 2: Ease the Transition, Remove Implementation Barriers...bottleneck, you unlock the next one. In the case of HTTP/2, TCP may be it. Which is why, once again, a well-tuned TCP stack

© 2016 F5 Networks

Ephemeral keys only (forward secrecy)

Stronger Cryptography

TLS 1.2 or newer required for HTTP/2

Minimal key sizes—128 bit EC, 2048 bit RSA

30

Page 45: 2: Ease the Transition, Remove Implementation Barriers...bottleneck, you unlock the next one. In the case of HTTP/2, TCP may be it. Which is why, once again, a well-tuned TCP stack

© 2016 F5 Networks

TLS Is Not Mandatory. But It Is Really.

31

Page 46: 2: Ease the Transition, Remove Implementation Barriers...bottleneck, you unlock the next one. In the case of HTTP/2, TCP may be it. Which is why, once again, a well-tuned TCP stack

So, Why Isn’t the Web All HTTP/2 Yet?

Page 47: 2: Ease the Transition, Remove Implementation Barriers...bottleneck, you unlock the next one. In the case of HTTP/2, TCP may be it. Which is why, once again, a well-tuned TCP stack

© 2016 F5 Networks

The requirement that all application traffic be secured via TLS/SSL

Incompatibility with current security infrastructure

Lack of familiarity with the technology

Low availability of HTTP/2 services

Lack of back-end support

Lack of backward compatibility with HTTP/1.x

19%

28%

29%

31%

31%

41%

Potential Barriers that Slow Adoption of HTTP/2

33

Page 48: 2: Ease the Transition, Remove Implementation Barriers...bottleneck, you unlock the next one. In the case of HTTP/2, TCP may be it. Which is why, once again, a well-tuned TCP stack

© 2016 F5 Networks

The requirement that all application traffic be secured via TLS/SSL

Incompatibility with current security infrastructure

Lack of familiarity with the technology

Low availability of HTTP/2 services

Lack of back-end support

Lack of backward compatibility with HTTP/1.x

19%

28%

29%

31%

31%

41%

Potential Barriers that Slow Adoption of HTTP/2

Source: IDG Enterprise Research

33

Page 49: 2: Ease the Transition, Remove Implementation Barriers...bottleneck, you unlock the next one. In the case of HTTP/2, TCP may be it. Which is why, once again, a well-tuned TCP stack

© 2016 F5 Networks

01101101 01100101 01101111 01110111

Optimization

Security Reporting

HTTP/2

Client

HTTP/2

Server

HTTP/2 Impacts the Infrastructure

34

Page 50: 2: Ease the Transition, Remove Implementation Barriers...bottleneck, you unlock the next one. In the case of HTTP/2, TCP may be it. Which is why, once again, a well-tuned TCP stack

© 2016 F5 Networks

So?

Inspection

Optimization

Reporting

Protocol Understanding

35

Page 51: 2: Ease the Transition, Remove Implementation Barriers...bottleneck, you unlock the next one. In the case of HTTP/2, TCP may be it. Which is why, once again, a well-tuned TCP stack

© 2016 F5 Networks

So?

Inspection

Optimization

Reporting

35

Page 52: 2: Ease the Transition, Remove Implementation Barriers...bottleneck, you unlock the next one. In the case of HTTP/2, TCP may be it. Which is why, once again, a well-tuned TCP stack

© 2016 F5 Networks

So?

Inspection

Optimization

Reporting

35

Page 53: 2: Ease the Transition, Remove Implementation Barriers...bottleneck, you unlock the next one. In the case of HTTP/2, TCP may be it. Which is why, once again, a well-tuned TCP stack

HTTP/2 Made Easy

Page 54: 2: Ease the Transition, Remove Implementation Barriers...bottleneck, you unlock the next one. In the case of HTTP/2, TCP may be it. Which is why, once again, a well-tuned TCP stack

© 2016 F5 Networks

01101101 01100101

HTTP/1.x

Client

HTTP/2

Server

Security

Optim

ization

Reporting

HTTP/2 Gateway

HTTP/2 Performance HTTP/ 1Simplicity Full ADC Services

Protocol Gateway

ADC

GET /images/cat.jpg

37

Page 55: 2: Ease the Transition, Remove Implementation Barriers...bottleneck, you unlock the next one. In the case of HTTP/2, TCP may be it. Which is why, once again, a well-tuned TCP stack

© 2016 F5 Networks

HTTP/1.x

Server

GET /images/cat.jpg01101101 01100101

Multi-Protocol Gateway

01101101 01100101GET /images/cat.jpg

SPDY

HTTP/2

HTTP/1.1

HTTP/1.1 GET /images/cat.jpg

ADC

Client

Protocol Gateway

38

Page 56: 2: Ease the Transition, Remove Implementation Barriers...bottleneck, you unlock the next one. In the case of HTTP/2, TCP may be it. Which is why, once again, a well-tuned TCP stack

© 2016 F5 Networks

Two Steps to Implement HTTP/2 Gateway

Copy HTTP/2 Profile

Add Profile to Virtual Server

39

Page 57: 2: Ease the Transition, Remove Implementation Barriers...bottleneck, you unlock the next one. In the case of HTTP/2, TCP may be it. Which is why, once again, a well-tuned TCP stack

© 2016 F5 Networks

Two Steps to Implement HTTP/2 Gateway

That’s it... really!

Copy HTTP/2 Profile

Add Profile to Virtual Server

39

Page 58: 2: Ease the Transition, Remove Implementation Barriers...bottleneck, you unlock the next one. In the case of HTTP/2, TCP may be it. Which is why, once again, a well-tuned TCP stack

© 2016 F5 Networks

HTTP/2 Profile Settings Things you might want to play with (then TEST):

Inserting a header if HTTP/2 is used – track on your webserver

Concurrent streams per connection: Increase to 30 or more

40

Page 59: 2: Ease the Transition, Remove Implementation Barriers...bottleneck, you unlock the next one. In the case of HTTP/2, TCP may be it. Which is why, once again, a well-tuned TCP stack

© 2016 F5 Networks

HTTP/1.1

From Slow…

41

Page 60: 2: Ease the Transition, Remove Implementation Barriers...bottleneck, you unlock the next one. In the case of HTTP/2, TCP may be it. Which is why, once again, a well-tuned TCP stack

© 2016 F5 Networks

HTTP/2

HTTP/1.1 bottleneck removed!

To Fast(er)

42

Page 61: 2: Ease the Transition, Remove Implementation Barriers...bottleneck, you unlock the next one. In the case of HTTP/2, TCP may be it. Which is why, once again, a well-tuned TCP stack

© 2016 F5 Networks 43

Page 62: 2: Ease the Transition, Remove Implementation Barriers...bottleneck, you unlock the next one. In the case of HTTP/2, TCP may be it. Which is why, once again, a well-tuned TCP stack

© 2016 F5 Networks 43

Page 63: 2: Ease the Transition, Remove Implementation Barriers...bottleneck, you unlock the next one. In the case of HTTP/2, TCP may be it. Which is why, once again, a well-tuned TCP stack

© 2016 F5 Networks

As with all performance optimization processes, the moment you remove one performance bottleneck, you unlock the next one. In the case of HTTP/2, TCP may be it. Which is why, once

again, a well-tuned TCP stack on the server is such a critical optimization criteria for HTTP/2.

High Performance Browser Networking, Ilya Grigorik, O’Reilly Media

44

Page 64: 2: Ease the Transition, Remove Implementation Barriers...bottleneck, you unlock the next one. In the case of HTTP/2, TCP may be it. Which is why, once again, a well-tuned TCP stack

© 2016 F5 Networks

TCP

01100011 01100001 01110100 00001101 00001010 01100011 01100001 01110100 00001101 00001010 01100011 01100001 01110100 00001101 00001010 01100011 01100001 01110100 00001101 00001010

01100011 01100001 01110100 00001101 00001010 01100011 01100001 01110100 00001101 0000101001100011 01100001 01110100 00001101 00001010 01100011 01100001 01110100 00001101 00001010

01100011 01100001 01110100 00001101 00001010 01100011 01100001 01110100 00001101 00001010 01100011 01100001 01110100 00001101 00001010 01100011 01100001 01110100 00001101 00001010

01100011 01100001 01110100 00001101 00001010 01100011 01100001 01110100 00001101 01110100 00001101 00001010 01100011 01100001 01110100 00001101 00001010

01100011 01100001 01110100 00001101 00001010 01100011 01100001 01110100 000011 0100 00001101 00001010 01100011 01100001 01110100 00001101 00001010

01100011 01100001 01110100 00001101 00001010 01100011 01100001 01110100 000 00 00001101 00001010 01100011 01100001 01110100 00001101 00001010

We’re Only Moving the Bottleneck

01100011 01100001 01110100 00001101 00001010 01100011 01100001 01110100 00 100 00001101 00001010 01100011 01100001 01110100 00001101 00001010

01100011 01100001 01110100 00001101 00001010 01100011 01100001 01110100 00001 10100 00001101 00001010 01100011 01100001 01110100 00001101 00001010

01100011 01100001 01110100 00001101 00001010 01100011 01100001 01110100 00001101 1110100 00001101 00001010 01100011 01100001 01110100 00001101 00001010

45

Page 65: 2: Ease the Transition, Remove Implementation Barriers...bottleneck, you unlock the next one. In the case of HTTP/2, TCP may be it. Which is why, once again, a well-tuned TCP stack

© 2016 F5 Networks

TCP Inefficiencies: the Next BottleneckThings to consider:

Congestion control algorithms

Window sizing

Multi-path TCP

High RTT and packet loss links (radio)

46

Page 66: 2: Ease the Transition, Remove Implementation Barriers...bottleneck, you unlock the next one. In the case of HTTP/2, TCP may be it. Which is why, once again, a well-tuned TCP stack

© 2016 F5 Networks

00001101 00001010 01100011 01100001 01110100 00001101 00001010 01100011

01100011 01100001 01110100 00001101 00001010 01100011 01100001 01110100 00001101 00001010 01100011 01100001 01110100 00001101 00001010 01100011 01100001 01110100 00001101 00001010 01100011

01100011 01100001 01110100 00001101 00001010 01100011 01100001 01110100 00001101 0000101001100011 01100001 01110100 00001101 00001010 01100011 01100001 01110100 00001101 00001010 01100011 0

00001101 00001010 01100011 01100001 01110100 00001101 00001010 01100011

Know any good ones?

Perhaps You Need a TCP Optimizer?

RTT = 100 ms TCP algorithm = Woodside

TCP window scale = 65,535 KB

RTT = 1 ms TCP algorithm = High speed TCP window scale = 1 MB

47

Page 67: 2: Ease the Transition, Remove Implementation Barriers...bottleneck, you unlock the next one. In the case of HTTP/2, TCP may be it. Which is why, once again, a well-tuned TCP stack

© 2016 F5 Networks

Summary

Binary protocol

TCP optimizations required

SSL offload essential

Significant performance improvements

Reduced header overhead

Smaller page size

Fully multi-plexed connections

Impact Performance Opportunities

Server push possibilities Leverage existing ADC

48

Page 68: 2: Ease the Transition, Remove Implementation Barriers...bottleneck, you unlock the next one. In the case of HTTP/2, TCP may be it. Which is why, once again, a well-tuned TCP stack

• Add class to your personal schedule.

• Survey will pop up in Mobile App. • Answer the multiple choice. • Submit your question to complete. • Receive 5 points!

Give Feedback – Get Points!

Page 69: 2: Ease the Transition, Remove Implementation Barriers...bottleneck, you unlock the next one. In the case of HTTP/2, TCP may be it. Which is why, once again, a well-tuned TCP stack

The Knowledge Reengineering Bottleneck

Bottleneck Identification and Scheduling in …users.ece.cmu.edu/~omutlu/pub/bottleneck-identification...Bottleneck Identification and Scheduling in Multithreaded Applications Jose´

Toc Bottleneck Examples

Bottleneck Hypothesis

TCP Offload through Connection Handoff · ing connection handoff, the system can fully utilize the processing power of the network interface without creating a bottleneck in the

Outline Introduction to TCP The single bottleneck case (Deterministic) Large network model (Stochastic) Matching TCP dynamics and MPEG video dynamics Input–output

Information Bottleneck

Bottleneck of Coordination

BOTTLENECK GUITAR Paolo Bonfanti Reno Brandoni · PDF fileImpaginazione: Mario Giovannini Foto di Copertina a back cover: Riccardo Bostiancich ... Guitar is usually tuned by fourths,

Requirements the Last Bottleneck

Potential Performance Bottleneck in Linux TCP/67531/metadc888303/... · Linux-based network end systems have been widely deployed in the High Energy Physics (HEP) community, at laboratories

1 TCP. 2 Contents TCP TCP connection TCP flow control TCP congestion control TCP timer UDP

bottleneck defines success

Potential Performance Bottleneck in Linux TCP - Fermilab | Home

Maximum Bottleneck Paths

SDG ACCELERATOR AND BOTTLENECK ASSESSMENTlocalizingthesdgs.org/library/401/SDG-Accelerator-and-Bottleneck... · The SDG Accelerator and Bottleneck Assessment tool was developed under

The Bottleneck Problem

Solving io bottleneck

THE BANDWIDTH BOTTLENECK - Engineering

Approximating geometric bottleneck shortest pathsnzeh/Publications/bottleneck_cgta04.pdf · bottleneck connectedness queries and bottleneck shortest path length queries can trivially

Freeway Bottleneck Removals Workshop

Evan Roggenkamp VoIP/IP Telephony. Designed for ISDN networks originally Tuned to work over TCP/IP Protocol Suite Built With: (some of them) H

Multivariate Information Bottleneck

( ( ( Tuned ) ) )

Using Bottleneck Verification to Find Novel New Attacks ... · Using Bottleneck Verification to Find Novel ... Probability of Attack for Every TCP/IP Session ... • Pre-Filter Assigns

The Bottleneck Model: An Assessment and Interpretationksmall/Bottleneck review.pdf ·  · 2015-01-06The Bottleneck Model: An Assessment and Interpretation . Kenneth A. Small. a

Kodak Bottleneck

Bregman Information Bottleneck

Solving the IO Bottleneck

GenomeQuest -- The Bioinformatics Bottleneck

Seeing Through The Bottleneck

Tuned In or Tuned Out to Your Client?

Stay Tuned! Stay tuned! Stay Tuned! - Montana State University

Traffic Bottleneck Analysis based on Floating Car Data · Traffic Bottleneck Analysis based on ... Case Study Citilabs ... Jeroen Brouwer - TomTom - Traffic bottleneck analysis based

The TCP traffic shares the bottleneck link bandwidth with ... TCP OVER ATM ... CCR Current Cell Rate Parameter used in ABR flow control ... CDV Cell Delay Variation ATM dos parameter