2. assessing evidence

8

Click here to load reader

Upload: ecoligne

Post on 24-May-2015

42 views

Category:

Education


3 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 2. assessing evidence

Credibility and Relevance

Assessing Evidence:

Page 2: 2. assessing evidence

The nature and importance of evidence

Assertions

Opinions

Facts

Theory

Testable

Hypothesis

(prediction)

Evidence

Essential Concepts in Critical Thinking

Page 3: 2. assessing evidence

Evidence:

Data that provides basis for a

point of view

Facts

Observations

Experimental

results

RELIABLE VALID

REPEATABLE

Assess the authorship and the nature of the source

Page 4: 2. assessing evidence

Primary sources Secondary sources

‘Raw’, original materials

or source where ideas

and data was first

communicated

• Data from experiments

• Artefacts

• Peer reviewed journals

Source that reuses

information from

primary sources

• Books

• Magazines

• Documentaries

• Blogs

Page 5: 2. assessing evidence

It is well known that increases in age adversely affect visual, tactile, and kinesthetic sensory

functioning. For example, aging leads to significant deteriorations in visual acuity [1]–[3]

and tactile acuity [4]–[7]; it is also accompanied by increases in weight-discrimination

thresholds [8]. Interestingly, however, higher-level perceptual abilities are often not

significantly affected by increases in age. Older adults can discriminate three-dimensional

(3-D) object shape as well as younger adults for both the visual and haptic modalities [9].

(Extract from: Holmin JS, Norman JF (2012) Aging and Weight-Ratio Perception. PLoS ONE 7(10): e47701)

References

1. Donders FC (1864) Accommodation and refraction of the eye, with a preliminary essay on physiological dioptrics.

(W. D. Moore, Trans.). London: New Sydenham Society. 188–193.

2. Elliott DB, Yang KCH, Whitaker D (1995) Visual acuity changes throughout adulthood in normal, healthy eyes:

Seeing beyond 6/6. Optom Vis Sci 72: 186–191.

3. Pitts DG (1982) Visual acuity as a function of age. J Am Optom Assoc 53(2): 117–124.

4. Norman JF, Kappers AML, Beers AM, Scott AK, Norman H, et al. (2011) Aging and the haptic perception of 3D

surface shape. Atten Percept Psychophys 73: 908–918

Page 6: 2. assessing evidence

Evidence:

Data judged to be relevant to

the topic investigated

Facts

Observations

Experimental

results

RELIABLE VALID

ACCURATE & RELEVANT

Evaluate the information and its interpretation

Page 7: 2. assessing evidence

Is the evidence ….

“France is a rainy country. My aunt in Paris says it rains 360

days of the year. All the supermarkets sell umbrellas! I

visited my aunt last year and it rained the entire weekend I

was there.”

Accurate? Relevant? Representative?

Page 8: 2. assessing evidence

AuthorshipWho says so?

AuthorityWho is he/she?

ProvenanceIs this a primary or a

secondary source?

Context

Evaluating

evidence’s

credibility &

relevance

When was it reported?

Is it focussed?

Is it representative?

Nature

Facts or opinions?

Accuracy

Is it accurate?

Are his/her views

shared?