2 6 7 8 united states district court 9 …docs.dpaq.de/13728-show_temp.pl-41.pdfapple’s motion for...
TRANSCRIPT
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN JOSE DIVISION
APPLE INC., a California corporation,
Plaintiff,
vs. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a Korean business entity; SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York corporation; SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,
Defendants.
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Case 5:11-cv-01846-LHK Document 3836 Filed 06/27/18 Page 1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-1- Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Whereas the Court has been advised by the parties that the above-entitled action has been
settled, all remaining claims and counterclaims in this case are hereby dismissed with prejudice, to
the extent such are still pending, and all parties shall bear their own attorneys’ fees and costs.
Apple’s Motion for Supplemental Damages, Prejudgment Interest, and Post-Judgment Interest
(Dkt. 3826-3), Samsung’s Motion for Entry of Judgment of Invalidity on Apple’s Claim for
Infringement of the ’915 Patent or in the Alternative for Relief from Judgment Under Rule
60(b)(6) (Dkt. 3827), and Samsung’s Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law, New Trial, and/or
Remittitur (Dkt. 3828-2) are denied as moot.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: The Honorable Lucy H. Koh
United States District Judge
June 27, 2018
The Clerk shall close the file.
Case 5:11-cv-01846-LHK Document 3836 Filed 06/27/18 Page 2 of 2