1).pdf · • price discovery (ex;rating agencies ineffecti) versus 8 • size of market and...

24
1 ! "##$%%#%"&$%#% &$%#%’(%)*+ ,-.-

Upload: others

Post on 12-May-2020

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 1).pdf · • price discovery (ex;rating agencies ineffecti) versus 8 • size of market and holding by banks (leveraged and not diversified) • lack of transparency => systemic

��������������“���� �� ����������� ��”

����������������

1

�������������������������� �� �� ���������

�������� �� ��������

����� ��� ������!

� ��������� �������

"��#�#$��%�%�#%�"���&$�%�#%

�&$�%�#%'�( �%�)*+��,-.-

Page 2: 1).pdf · • price discovery (ex;rating agencies ineffecti) versus 8 • size of market and holding by banks (leveraged and not diversified) • lack of transparency => systemic

OUTLINE

• BACKGROUND• BENEFITS• COSTS (ISSUES)• DERIVATIVES IN THIS Financial Crisis• FINANCIAL CRISES – LESSONS NOT LEARNED

2

• FINANCIAL CRISES – LESSONS NOT LEARNED• VOLATILITIES AND CORRELATIONS• CURRENT REGULATION• PENDING REGULATION

Page 3: 1).pdf · • price discovery (ex;rating agencies ineffecti) versus 8 • size of market and holding by banks (leveraged and not diversified) • lack of transparency => systemic

BRIEF HISTORY• PRE 1970 – COMMODOITIES (AGRIC, METALS)• POST 1970 – FINANCIALS (FX, DEBT, EQUITIES,

CREDIT)

SIZE OF MARKETS (NOTIONAL)

BACKGROUND

3

SIZE OF MARKETS (NOTIONAL)• EXCHANGE TRADED – 60 $trn (2009) vs. 80 $trn

(2008)• OVER THE COUNTER – 610 $trn (2009) vs. 685 $trn

(2008)

OTC DERIVATIVE MARKETS:• INTEREST RATE DERIVATIVES – 500 $trn• FOREIGN EXCHNGE DERIVATIVES – 40 $trn• COMMODITIES – 40 $trn• CREDIT DEFAULT SWAPS – 30 $trn

Page 4: 1).pdf · • price discovery (ex;rating agencies ineffecti) versus 8 • size of market and holding by banks (leveraged and not diversified) • lack of transparency => systemic

OTC DERIVATIVES

���

���

���

���

���

������������������� �������������������� �������������

�� �����������������������

4

���

���

��

���

�� ���� ������ ���������� ��� � ������ ���������� ����������� ����������

!�" " � ������������� !� ��� #������$ �%� &��������

Source: Bank for International Settlements, OTC derivatives market activity in the first half of 2009

Page 5: 1).pdf · • price discovery (ex;rating agencies ineffecti) versus 8 • size of market and holding by banks (leveraged and not diversified) • lack of transparency => systemic

ALL CDOs

5

SOURCE: THOMSON REUTERS, SIFMA

Page 6: 1).pdf · • price discovery (ex;rating agencies ineffecti) versus 8 • size of market and holding by banks (leveraged and not diversified) • lack of transparency => systemic

FINANCIAL MARKETS ���� ECONOMIC GROWTHDERIVATIVE MARKETS ���� FINANCIAL MARKETSDERIVATIVE MARKETS ���� ECONOMIC GROWTH

– RISK MANAGEMENT (MARKET COMPLETION)

BENEFITS (ECONOMIC/SOCIAL WELFARE)

6

– PRICE DISCOVERY

– LIQUIDITY ENHANCEMENT

– VOLATILITY REDUCTION

– FORWARD LOOKING INFORMATION

Page 7: 1).pdf · • price discovery (ex;rating agencies ineffecti) versus 8 • size of market and holding by banks (leveraged and not diversified) • lack of transparency => systemic

PROBLEMS, IN GENERAL, HOW USED, TRADED, CLEARED

– EASE OF LEVERAGING

– COMPLEXITY

– “SHORT” SQUEZE

COSTS – RISKS (MOSTLY ASSOCIATED WITH OTC)

7

– LACK OF LIQUIDITY

– LACK OF TRANSPARENCY

– COUNTERPARTY RISK

– SYSTEMIC RISK (NOT OBSERVED)

– LACK OF REGULATORY OVERSIGHT

Page 8: 1).pdf · • price discovery (ex;rating agencies ineffecti) versus 8 • size of market and holding by banks (leveraged and not diversified) • lack of transparency => systemic

DERIVATIVES IN THE FINANCIAL CRISISCDS – A Cost-Benefit Analysis

• HEDGING CREDIT RISK (EX; EXTENDING LOANS)• PRICE DISCOVERY (EX;RATING AGENCIES INEFFECTI)

VERSUS

8

• SIZE OF MARKET AND HOLDING BY BANKS (LEVERAGED AND NOT DIVERSIFIED)

• LACK OF TRANSPARENCY => SYSTEMIC RISK• COMPLEXITY (CDO²..) => SYSTEMIC RISK• LACK OF OVERSIGHT TO ADDRESS SYSTEMIC RISK

Page 9: 1).pdf · • price discovery (ex;rating agencies ineffecti) versus 8 • size of market and holding by banks (leveraged and not diversified) • lack of transparency => systemic

• 1986 + S&L CRISIS - Real Estate bubble (TAX EXEMPTION)

1000 S&LS WIPED OUT (RTC Restructured Loans)

COST - $250 BILLION (Current Prices)

LESSON: MORAL HAZARD - GOVERNMENT BAIL OUT

• 1987 STOCK MARKETS CRASH – Market Structure issues

FINANCIAL CRISES – LESSONS NOT LEARNED

9

• 1987 STOCK MARKETS CRASH – Market Structure issues

DERIVATIVES BLAMED: Portfolio Insurance, Index arbitrage

Crash Indicator (consequence) – extremely high Volatility

• FED SUPPLIED LIQUIDITY, INDEX ARBITRAGE RESTRICTED

LESSONS: MARKETS ARE GLOBALIZED, IMPROPER

REGULATION IS COUNTER PRODUCTIVE

Page 10: 1).pdf · • price discovery (ex;rating agencies ineffecti) versus 8 • size of market and holding by banks (leveraged and not diversified) • lack of transparency => systemic

• 1997- ASIAN FINANCIAL CRISIS (Currency-Credit Crisis)

Central Bank Policies => Excessive Borrowing. (High Volatility)

LESSON: BEWARE OF EXCESSIVE LEVERAGE

• 1998 (Fall) – RUSSAIN DEFAULT & LTCM DEFAULT

FINANCIAL CRISES – LESSONS NOT LEARNED (c)

10

Crash Indicator (consequence) – extremely high Volatility

FED INTERVENTION; To Prevent Melt Down

LESSONS: ECESSIVE LEVERAGE, POOR RISK MANGEMENT

POOR OVERSIGHT (Lack of Transparency) ���� SYSTEMIC RISK

FED INTERVENTION – MORAL HAZARD

Page 11: 1).pdf · • price discovery (ex;rating agencies ineffecti) versus 8 • size of market and holding by banks (leveraged and not diversified) • lack of transparency => systemic

• 2001+ SECURITIZATION: MORTGAGES PACKAGED INTOCDOs WITH RISK TRANCHES (80% sold to investors)

• INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS AROUND THE WORLD BOUGHT CDOs (PENSION FUNDS, HEDGE FUNDS)

FINANCIAL CRISES – LESSONS NOT LEARNED (cont.)

11

• BUYERS OF CDOs WOULD BUY INSURANCE (CDS) FROM BEAR STERNS, AIG, ETC.

• BUT SOME ON THE SAME SIDE (LONG CDOS AND SHORT CDS)

• 2003-2007 LOW VOLATILITY IN STOCKS, BONDS ANDCURRENCIES ADDED TO RISK TAKING ATTITUDE(SEE VOLATILITY CHARTS)

Page 12: 1).pdf · • price discovery (ex;rating agencies ineffecti) versus 8 • size of market and holding by banks (leveraged and not diversified) • lack of transparency => systemic

GARCH VOLATILITY: S&P, DAX, HSI

12Source: NYU-Stern VLAB

Page 13: 1).pdf · • price discovery (ex;rating agencies ineffecti) versus 8 • size of market and holding by banks (leveraged and not diversified) • lack of transparency => systemic

CORPORATE AA BOND VOLATILITY

13Source: NYU-Stern VLAB

Page 14: 1).pdf · • price discovery (ex;rating agencies ineffecti) versus 8 • size of market and holding by banks (leveraged and not diversified) • lack of transparency => systemic

Implied Volatility Indices (May 00 / May 10)

50

60

70

80

90

VIX

VXN

14

Source: Bloomberg

0

10

20

30

40

May-00 May-01 May-02 May-03 May-04 May-05 May-06 May-07 May-08 May-09 May-10

Page 15: 1).pdf · • price discovery (ex;rating agencies ineffecti) versus 8 • size of market and holding by banks (leveraged and not diversified) • lack of transparency => systemic

• HOLD HIGHLY RISKY PORTFOLIOS (CDOs, CDSs)

• UNPRECEDENTED EXCESSIVE LEVERAGE

• POOR RISK MANAGEMENT (IGNORE TAIL RISK)

FINANCIAL CRISES – LESSONS NOT LEARNED (current crisis)

15

• OBLIVIENT TO SYSTEMIC RISK; NO ONE WATCHING

• COUNTING ON BAIL OUT (MORAL HAZARED IN PLAY)

• MARCH 2008 BEAR STEARNS – NO RED LIGHT –

CONFIRMS THE ABOVE (BAIL OUT….)

Page 16: 1).pdf · • price discovery (ex;rating agencies ineffecti) versus 8 • size of market and holding by banks (leveraged and not diversified) • lack of transparency => systemic

DOLLAR INDEX VOLATILITY

16Source: NYU-Stern VLAB

Page 17: 1).pdf · • price discovery (ex;rating agencies ineffecti) versus 8 • size of market and holding by banks (leveraged and not diversified) • lack of transparency => systemic

CONDITIONS FOR A WELL FUNCTIONING DERIVATIVES MARKET

• FINANCIAL UNCERTAINTY (NOT SUBSIDIZED)

• DEMAND FOR HEDGING (LONG AND SHORT)

• LIQUID TRADED UNDERLYING ASSET

• MARKET STRUCTURE AND PRODUCT DESIGN• MARKET STRUCTURE AND PRODUCT DESIGN

• EXCHANGE VS. OTC – STANDARDIZED vs. TAILORED

TRADEOFF: LIQUIDITY vs. HEDGING EFFECTIVENESSCLEARING CORP vs. COUNTER PARTY RISK MARKET VALUES vs. MODEL VALUESTRANSPARENCY vs. OPAQUENESS ����SYSTEMIC RISK

Page 18: 1).pdf · • price discovery (ex;rating agencies ineffecti) versus 8 • size of market and holding by banks (leveraged and not diversified) • lack of transparency => systemic

REGULATORY PRINCIPLES

• ISSUES: COUNTERPARTY RISK (ILLIQUIDITY), CAPITAL EROSION IN FI (LIQUIDITY PROVIDERS), NON “FAIR” VALUATION

• ALL SOURCES OF SYSTEMIC RISK (ARISING FROM OTC)

• MAIN PRINCIPLE: TRANSPARENCY (REGULATOR, PUBLIC)

18

• SECOND PRINCIPLE: “FAIR VALUE” (CONTINOUS, MTM, MTM’)

• THIRD PRINCIPLE: AVOID REGULATORY ARBITRAGE (DOMESTIC, INTERNATIONAL)

• SOLUTIONS: REGISTRY, CENTRAL CLEARING, EXCHANGE

Page 19: 1).pdf · • price discovery (ex;rating agencies ineffecti) versus 8 • size of market and holding by banks (leveraged and not diversified) • lack of transparency => systemic

LEVEL I – REGISTRY

• REGULATOR: ALL OTC TRANSACTIONS (DETAILS)- PRICE, VOLUME (SIZE), PARTIES (INSTITUTIONS)

• PUBLIC– TRACE FOR VOLUME/PRICES (EXCEPTION,

LARGE TRADES)

19

– POSSIBLY POSITIONS, PERHAPS 13-F LIKE FILINGS, OR SOME AGGREGATION (INSTITUTIONS/BILATERAL)

Page 20: 1).pdf · • price discovery (ex;rating agencies ineffecti) versus 8 • size of market and holding by banks (leveraged and not diversified) • lack of transparency => systemic

• CURRENT CC (E.G. OCC, CME, ICE, HKE….)

• NEWLY CREATED NETWORK OF FIs

• ADVANTAGES: SIGNALING, TRANSPARENCY,

CONTINUOUS MONITORING, VALUATION AND

LEVEL II – CENTRAL CLEARING

20

CONTINUOUS MONITORING, VALUATION AND

MARGINING

• SYSTEMIC RISK CLOSE TO ZERO (NO CC

DEFAULTED)

Page 21: 1).pdf · • price discovery (ex;rating agencies ineffecti) versus 8 • size of market and holding by banks (leveraged and not diversified) • lack of transparency => systemic

Proposal – Clearing House'(!�) �����! ������!� ������*��� �

���

���

���

��� ���

���

21

���

���

������

��� ���

��� �

���

Page 22: 1).pdf · • price discovery (ex;rating agencies ineffecti) versus 8 • size of market and holding by banks (leveraged and not diversified) • lack of transparency => systemic

LEVEL III – DERIVATIVES EXCHANGE

• STANDARDIZED PRODUCTS (E.G. CDS)

• MEMBERS WELL CAPITALIZED

• LIQUID AND TRANSPARENT

• MARGINING SYSTEM

22

• MARGINING SYSTEM

• PROBOBILITY OF COLLAPSE SMALL (TIED TO CC)

Page 23: 1).pdf · • price discovery (ex;rating agencies ineffecti) versus 8 • size of market and holding by banks (leveraged and not diversified) • lack of transparency => systemic

PENDING LEGISLATION: REGULATORY ACTION, TAXES AND OTHER

• SHORT SELLING; “ALTERNATIVE UPTICK RULE” PASSED

• OTC DERIVATIVES => CLEARING CORP. => EXCHANGES (?)

• REGULATION OF RATING AGENCIES TO AVOID CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

• DISCLOUSRE OF POSITIONS BY HEDGE FUNDS (?)

23

• DISCLOUSRE OF POSITIONS BY HEDGE FUNDS (?)

• CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION AGENCY (FED?)

• FINANCIAL TRANSACTION TAX (THE “TOBIN TAX”) (?)

• THE VOLCKER RULE: BANKS - NO PROPRIETRY TRADING (?)

• RULES TO LIMIT SPECULATION (EURO, OIL, OTHER)

Page 24: 1).pdf · • price discovery (ex;rating agencies ineffecti) versus 8 • size of market and holding by banks (leveraged and not diversified) • lack of transparency => systemic

Regulation-Update

• Ban on “naked” shorts (CDS) – Germany• Senate Bill on Derivatives Passed• Ban on Speculation in Derivatives - Germany