1.pab2084_correlations.pdf

45
Logs and Correlations PAB2084 3 Techniques

Upload: tanaskumarkanesan

Post on 20-Sep-2015

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Logs and Correlations

    PAB2084

    3

    Techniques

  • Course PAB2084 outcome:

    Describe the properties of rocks and fluids that produce characteristic log signals.

    Analyze and interpret the log to determine porosity, fluid saturation, lithology and hydrocarbon types.

    Calculate Rock and Net Hydrocarbon VolumeWell logs application/uses..

  • Well Log CorrelationsFacies & Stratigraphic Correlations; 3D @

    Fence Diagram; Log Facies Analysis

    Subsurface Map & Volumetric CalculationSubsurface data; Contours ; isopach &

    isochore ; faulted block ; unconformity layer ; folding block; volumetric calculation

  • Objectives/learning outcomes:

    Explain the use of well logs for correlationPerform correlation across wells with the

    right tool & method/technique

  • Correlation: Why??

    To develop depositional model of the reservoir sands and bounding shales in order to understand the facies distribution within the reservoir interval

    To understand the lateral continuity and variation of the reservoir sands in the field so that the field can be developed optimally

    *seismic well logs cores*more data more evidence more confidence and

    interpretation may change accordingly..

  • Well logs for correlation

    Electric Logs : GR (Gamma Ray) Resistivity Log (ILD or MSFL) SP (Spontaneous Potential) Sonic Density Log Neutron Porosity + etcs.

    Others-annotate/tie Microfossils data Core description data Seismic picks (Converted from TWT to Depths)

  • Data preparation:

    Select curves to useSplice logsAnnotate ie formation tops, markers,

    casing.. Display at comparable scale, 1:500, 1: 1000Same depth reference

  • Log splicing:

  • DFE

    tvssahbdf

    TDTD

    ahbdf

    sea levelsea level

    DEPTH REFERENCES, UNITS, MEASUREMENTS

    ss = subseabdf = below derric floortv = true verticalah = along holeTD = total depthDFE = derric floor elevationft/m, kb, rt, mudline

    tvss

  • Correlation: Steps/method

    Identify a common surface/markers to be used as datum (i.e coal)

    Positions and 'hangs' all wells on this surface according to its sequence from the map

    Identify 'sand unit' and try to correlate them laterally

    Correlate 'minor' events to complete the correlation for detail facies interpretation

  • Correlation: Tips

    Faults?If correlation is 'lost' or similar event do not

    exist between wells - A break in the sedimentary layers

    Missing layer - Normal faultCreated duplicate layer - Reverse fault

  • SIMPLE LOG CORRELATION EXERCISE:

    set 3(ARBITARY SCALE)

    set 4(ARBITARY SCALE)

    GR GR GR GR

    GR GR GR GR

  • LOG CORRELATION SAMPLE ANSWER

    set 4(ARBITARY SCALE)

    GR GR GR GR

    set 3(ARBITARY SCALE)

    GR GR GR GR

  • LOG CORRELATION EXERCISE

    set 5(ARBITARY SCALE)

    set 6(ARBITARY SCALE)

    GR GR GR GR

    GR GR GR GR

  • LOG CORRELATION SAMPLE ANSWER

    set 5(ARBITARY SCALE)

    set 6(ARBITARY SCALE)

    GR GR GR GR

    GR GR GR GR

  • Cleaning-up trend (funnel shape): a gradual upward decrease in gamma response. In shallow marine settings, this trend reflects a change from shale-rich into sand-rich lithology and upward increase in depositional energy with shallowing-upward and coarsening. In deep marine settings, this trend reflects an increase in the sand contents of turbidite bodies. This trend also may indicate gradual change from clastic to carbonate deposition.Dirtying-up trend (bell shape): a gradual upward increase in gamma response: This trend may reflect upward fining (eg: a lithology change from sand to shale) or upward fining of sand beds in a thinly interbedded sand-shale unit. This trend usually implies a decrease in depositional energy. In a non-marine setting, fining upward is predominant within meandering or tidal channel deposits with an upward decrease in fluid velocity within a channel (coarser sediments at base of channel). In a shallow-marine setting, this trend usually reflects an upward deepening and a decrease in depositional energy (shoreline retreat). In deep-marine settings, this trend reflects waning of submarine fans (reducing of sand contents).Boxcar trend (cylindrical or block shape): with low gamma and sharp boundaries and no internal change: this trend is predominant in fluvial channel sands, turbidites (typically with greater range of thickness), and aeolian sands. Evaporites also can have a cylindrical gamma trend.Additionally two in-between trends can be recognized:Bow trend (symmetrical or barrel): with gradual decrease then gradual increase in gamma response: this is usually the result of progradation and retrogration of clastic sediments.Irregular trend (lack of character): this trend represents aggradation of shales or silts and can occur in other settings.

  • Correlation:

    Stratigraphic litho, chrono/sequence strat...

    Structural

  • STRUCTURAL CORRELATION

    Datum : on the same depths (usually TVD) for all wellsTo represent the GOC/GWC or OWC contacts on its true

    structural position

    For field development, the correlation is to display other applicable well information that needs true structural positions

  • 2500

    2600

    2500

    2600

    2500

    2600

    STRUCTURAL CORRELATION

    Fault

    Well 1 Well 2 Well 3

    Datum on same TVDSS

    Like flattened

  • 2500

    2600

    2500

    2600

    C-Marker

    D Sand

    E Sand

    2500

    2600

    STRUCTURAL CORRELATION

    Fault

    Well 1 Well 2 Well 3

    Base sand

  • Fence diagram (fr SLB)

    A graphical display of three-dimensional data and interpretations in two-dimensional perspective view. Geologic cross sections can be displayed in a network to form a fence diagram. Stratigraphic changes can be displayed clearly in fence diagrams

  • CORRELATION IN PETREL?

  • NO. 3 NO. 27 NO. 15 NO. 10 NO. 2SP Amplified

    Short Normal

    E1 MARKER = DATUM

    CORRELATION EXERCISE in class

  • CORRELATION EXERCISE in class

    GR GR GR GR GR

    Structures

    RIP-UP CLASTS, PEBBLESWAVE RIPPLEHUMMOCKY X-BEDS

    CURRENT RIPPLEPLANAR BEDS

    THROUGH X-BEDS

    0 140 0 140 0 140 0 140 0 140

  • NO. 3 NO. 27 NO. 15 NO. 10 NO. 2SP Amplified

    Short Normal

    CORRELATION EXCERCISE = SOLUTION

    E1 MARKER = DATUM

  • CORRELATION EXCERCISE = SOLUTION

    FS/SB

    SB

    C1

    C2

    C3

    C4

    C5

    Truncated stacked sands

    GR GR GR GR GR

    Fluvial Channel

    Shoreface

    Tidal Delta

    Shelf Mudstone(Marine)

    Swamp Mudstone-TerrestrialFS

  • Slide 1Slide 2Slide 3Slide 4Slide 5Slide 6Slide 7Slide 8Slide 9Slide 10Slide 11Slide 12Slide 13Slide 14Slide 15Slide 16Slide 17Slide 18Slide 19Slide 20Slide 21Slide 22Slide 23Slide 24Slide 25Slide 26Slide 27Slide 28Slide 29Slide 30Slide 31Slide 32Slide 33Slide 34Slide 35Slide 36Slide 37Slide 38Slide 39Slide 40Slide 41Slide 42Slide 43Slide 44Slide 45