1b. viability assessment and goals
DESCRIPTION
Conservation Coaches Network Workshop Presentation. 1B. Viability Assessment and Goals. Adaptive Management Workshop Presentations. 1A-1B. Team, Scope, Vision 1B. Conservation Targets 1B. Viability Assessment. 2A-1. Strategy Selection 2A-2. Results Chains 2A-3. Goals and Objectives. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: 1B. Viability Assessment and Goals](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813b00550346895da39da8/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
1B. Viability Assessment and Goals
Conservation Coaches Network Workshop Presentation
![Page 2: 1B. Viability Assessment and Goals](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813b00550346895da39da8/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Adaptive Management Workshop Presentations
1A-1B. Team, Scope, Vision1B. Conservation Targets1B. Viability Assessment 2A-1. Strategy Selection
2A-2. Results Chains2A-3. Goals and Objectives
2B. Monitoring Plan
1C. Threat Rating
1D. Conceptual Models
![Page 3: 1B. Viability Assessment and Goals](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813b00550346895da39da8/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Conceptualize Viability Assessment
![Page 4: 1B. Viability Assessment and Goals](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813b00550346895da39da8/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
This Presentation
• What is viability assessment?• How to do viability assessment• Additional examples of viability assessment• Advice for doing viability assessment
Viability Assessment
![Page 5: 1B. Viability Assessment and Goals](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813b00550346895da39da8/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Viability AssessmentWhat is it?
ViabilityViability (ecological integrity) of a conservation target is the measure to which the target is…….
resistant to change in its structure and composition in the face of external stresses and
resilient – able to recover upon experiencing occasional severe stress
Viability Assessment
![Page 6: 1B. Viability Assessment and Goals](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813b00550346895da39da8/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Viability assessment helps teams answer important questions:
Bog frog
Bog frog• What key characteristics define a
healthy target?
• How do we physically measure those characteristics? (indicators)
• How is our target doing now?
• What do we want to achieve? (ultimate, measurable goals)
Viability Assessment
Viability AssessmentWhat is it?
![Page 7: 1B. Viability Assessment and Goals](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813b00550346895da39da8/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
This Presentation
• What is viability assessment?• How to do viability assessment• Additional examples of viability assessment• Advice for doing viability assessment
Viability Assessment
![Page 8: 1B. Viability Assessment and Goals](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813b00550346895da39da8/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Adapted from WWF Australia’s WeltlandsWatch Project
Viability Assessment
Our Example – Swan Coastal Plain Wetlands
![Page 9: 1B. Viability Assessment and Goals](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813b00550346895da39da8/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Swan Coastal Plain
Conservation Targets
• Seasonally flooded wetlands• Eucalyptus-Melaleuca woodlands • Fringing shrublands• Permanent lakes• Blue-billed ducks
Viability Assessment
![Page 10: 1B. Viability Assessment and Goals](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813b00550346895da39da8/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
The Basics Viability Assessment
![Page 11: 1B. Viability Assessment and Goals](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813b00550346895da39da8/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
1) Define “key ecological attributes” (KEAs) of your target.
KEA: Aspects of a target’s biology or ecology that- If present, define a healthy target
- If missing or altered, would lead to the loss or extreme degradation of that target over time.
Examples: Tropical hardwood forest target: size, connectivity among systems,
presence of key species Migratory fish target: population status, access to spawning
habitat, quality of spawning habitat
The Details Viability Assessment
![Page 12: 1B. Viability Assessment and Goals](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813b00550346895da39da8/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Consider the following categories:Size:
•Geographic extent (ecosystem or habitat)
•Abundance &/or demographics of the population/community (species)
Condition:
•Composition, structure, & biotic interactions
Landscape Context:
•Landscape-scale ecological processes, connectivity
The Details
1) Define “key ecological attributes” of your target.
Viability Assessment
![Page 13: 1B. Viability Assessment and Goals](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813b00550346895da39da8/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Target Category KEA Indicator
Blue billed ducks
SizePopulation
size
# adult birds of
reproductive age
The Details
1) Define “key ecological attributes” of your target.
Viability Assessment
![Page 14: 1B. Viability Assessment and Goals](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813b00550346895da39da8/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
The Details
2) Identify an indicator(s) for your KEA
Target Category KEA Indicator
Blue billed ducks
SizePopulation
size
# adult birds of
reproductive age
Viability Assessment
![Page 15: 1B. Viability Assessment and Goals](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813b00550346895da39da8/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Indicators are measurable aspects of the Key Ecological Attribute that inform us of its status or “health”
Indicators
Indicators are what you measure
Key Attribute: Circulatory system Indicator: Blood pressure
Viability Assessment
![Page 16: 1B. Viability Assessment and Goals](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813b00550346895da39da8/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
The Details
3) Describe what would constitute “good” status of the indicator.
Indicator Ratings
Target Category KEA Indicator Poor Fair Good Very Good
Blue billed ducks
SizePopulation
size
# adult birds of
reproductive age
Viability Assessment
![Page 17: 1B. Viability Assessment and Goals](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813b00550346895da39da8/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Indicator Ratings
Target Category KEA Indicator Poor Fair Good Very Good
Blue billed ducks
SizePopulation
size
# adult birds of
reproductive age
Good:Indicator w/in
acceptable range of variation; Some
intervention required for maintenance
Fair:Outside acceptable range of variation; Requires human
intervention
Threshold line
The Details Viability Assessment
![Page 18: 1B. Viability Assessment and Goals](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813b00550346895da39da8/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
The Details
What is an “acceptable range of variation?”
Viability Assessment
![Page 19: 1B. Viability Assessment and Goals](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813b00550346895da39da8/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Indicator Ratings
Target Category KEA Indicator Poor Fair Good Very Good
Blue billed ducks
SizePopulation
size
# adult birds of
reproductive age
Very Good: Ecologically desirable status; Requires little
intervention for maintenance
Good:Indicator w/in
acceptable range of variation; Some
intervention required for maintenance
Poor: Restoration
increasingly difficult; May result in extirpation
Fair:Outside acceptable range of variation; Requires human
intervention
Threshold line
The Details Viability Assessment
![Page 20: 1B. Viability Assessment and Goals](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813b00550346895da39da8/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Indicator Ratings
Target Category KEA Indicator Poor Fair Good Very Good
Blue billed ducks
SizePopulation
size
# adult birds of
reproductive age
1000 or more
Very Good: Ecologically desirable status; Requires little
intervention for maintenance
Good:Indicator w/in
acceptable range of variation; Some
intervention required for maintenance
Poor: Restoration
increasingly difficult; May result in extirpation
Fair:Outside acceptable range of variation; Requires human
intervention
Threshold line
The Details Viability Assessment
![Page 21: 1B. Viability Assessment and Goals](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813b00550346895da39da8/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Indicator Ratings
Target Category KEA Indicator Poor Fair Good Very Good
Blue billed ducks
SizePopulation
size
# adult birds of
reproductive age
<10001000 or
more
Very Good: Ecologically desirable status; Requires little
intervention for maintenance
Good:Indicator w/in
acceptable range of variation; Some
intervention required for maintenance
Poor: Restoration
increasingly difficult; May result in extirpation
Fair:Outside acceptable range of variation; Requires human
intervention
Threshold line
The Details Viability Assessment
![Page 22: 1B. Viability Assessment and Goals](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813b00550346895da39da8/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
The Details
4) Define the current state and desired future state for your target
Indicator Ratings
Target Category KEA Indicator Poor Fair Good Very Good
Blue billed ducks
SizePopulation
size
# adult birds of
reproductive age
<10001000 or
more
Current Status<1000 (~900)
Desired Future Status >1000
Viability Assessment
![Page 23: 1B. Viability Assessment and Goals](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813b00550346895da39da8/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Indicator Ratings
Target Category KEA Indicator Poor Fair Good Very Good
Blue billed ducks
SizePopulation
size
# adult birds of
reproductive age
700 – 999
1,000 – 2,000
Threshold line
The Details Viability Assessment
![Page 24: 1B. Viability Assessment and Goals](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813b00550346895da39da8/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Indicator Ratings
Target Category KEA Indicator Poor Fair Good Very Good
Blue billed ducks
SizePopulation
size
# adult birds of
reproductive age
< 700 700 – 999
1,000 – 2,000
> 2,000
Threshold line
The Details Viability Assessment
![Page 25: 1B. Viability Assessment and Goals](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813b00550346895da39da8/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Viability in Miradi Viability Assessment
![Page 26: 1B. Viability Assessment and Goals](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813b00550346895da39da8/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Viability Assessment
Preview of Goals
From the Viability Assessment…
Indicator Ratings
Target Category Characte
r-istic Indicator Poor Fair Good
Very Good
Blue billed ducks
SizePopulation
size
# adult birds of
reproductive age
700 – 999
1,000 – 2,000
> 2,000 700 – 999
Current Status 900
Desired Future Status 1,500
Goal: By ~2025, there are at least 1,500 adult
blue-billed ducks of reproductive age in the
Swan Coastal Plain
![Page 27: 1B. Viability Assessment and Goals](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813b00550346895da39da8/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Very Good: Ecologically desirable status; Requires little
intervention for maintenance
Good:Indicator w/in
acceptable range of variation; Some
intervention required for maintenance
Poor: Restoration
increasingly difficult; May result in extirpation
Fair:Outside acceptable range of variation; Requires human
intervention
Target Category KEA
Seasonally flooded
wetlandsCondition
Community architecture
Another Example Viability Assessment
![Page 28: 1B. Viability Assessment and Goals](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813b00550346895da39da8/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Very Good: Ecologically desirable status; Requires little
intervention for maintenance
Good:Indicator w/in
acceptable range of variation; Some
intervention required for maintenance
Poor: Restoration
increasingly difficult; May result in extirpation
Fair:Outside acceptable range of variation; Requires human
intervention
Target Category KEA Indicator
Seasonally flooded
wetlandsCondition
Community architecture
Native plant species richness
Another Example Viability Assessment
![Page 29: 1B. Viability Assessment and Goals](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813b00550346895da39da8/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Very Good: Ecologically desirable status; Requires little
intervention for maintenance
Good:Indicator w/in
acceptable range of variation; Some
intervention required for maintenance
Poor: Restoration
increasingly difficult; May result in extirpation
Fair:Outside acceptable range of variation; Requires human
intervention
Indicator Ratings
Target Category KEA Indicator Poor Fair Good Very
Good
Seasonally flooded
wetlandsCondition
Community architecture
Native plant species richness
Mostly native
vegetat-ion
Native vegetat-ion only
Another Example Viability Assessment
![Page 30: 1B. Viability Assessment and Goals](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813b00550346895da39da8/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Very Good: Ecologically desirable status; Requires little
intervention for maintenance
Good:Indicator w/in
acceptable range of variation; Some
intervention required for maintenance
Poor: Restoration
increasingly difficult; May result in extirpation
Fair:Outside acceptable range of variation; Requires human
intervention
Indicator Ratings
Target Category KEA Indicator Poor Fair Good Very
Good
Seasonally flooded
wetlandsCondition
Community architecture
Native plant species richness
Predom-inantly
invasive exotics
Some invasives
Mostly native
vegetat-ion
Native vegetat-ion only
Another Example Viability Assessment
![Page 31: 1B. Viability Assessment and Goals](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813b00550346895da39da8/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Very Good: Ecologically desirable status; Requires little
intervention for maintenance
Good:Indicator w/in
acceptable range of variation; Some
intervention required for maintenance
Poor: Restoration
increasingly difficult; May result in extirpation
Fair:Outside acceptable range of variation; Requires human
intervention
Indicator Ratings
Target Category KEA Indicator Poor Fair Good Very
Good
Seasonally flooded
wetlandsCondition
Community architecture
Native plant species richness
Predom-inantly
invasive exotics
Some invasives
Mostly native
vegetat-ion
Native vegetat-ion only
Current StatusSome
invasives
Desired Future StatusMostly native
Another Example Viability Assessment
![Page 32: 1B. Viability Assessment and Goals](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813b00550346895da39da8/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Very Good: Ecologically desirable status; Requires little
intervention for maintenance
Good:Indicator w/in
acceptable range of variation; Some
intervention required for maintenance
Poor: Restoration
increasingly difficult; May result in extirpation
Fair:Outside acceptable range of variation; Requires human
intervention
Indicator Ratings
Target Category KEA Indicator Poor Fair Good Very
Good
Seasonally flooded
wetlandsCondition
Community architecture
Native plant species richness
Predom-inantly
invasive exotics
Some invasives
Mostly native
vegetat-ion
Native vegetat-ion only
Current StatusSome
invasives
Desired Future StatusMostly native
By ~2030, the seasonally flooded
wetlands of the Swan Coastal Plain are
composed of at least 95% native species.
Another Example Viability Assessment
![Page 33: 1B. Viability Assessment and Goals](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813b00550346895da39da8/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
This Presentation
• What is viability assessment?• How to do viability assessment• Additional examples of viability assessment• Advice for doing viability assessment
Viability Assessment
![Page 34: 1B. Viability Assessment and Goals](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813b00550346895da39da8/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
FocalTarget
CategoryKey
Attribute
Mangrove Forest
SizeHabitat
Size
KEA for Mangrove Forest
Viability Assessment
![Page 35: 1B. Viability Assessment and Goals](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813b00550346895da39da8/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
FocalTarget
CategoryKey
Attribute
Indicator
Mangrove Forest
SizeHabitat
Size
% of original forest
Indicator for Mangrove Forest
Viability Assessment
![Page 36: 1B. Viability Assessment and Goals](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813b00550346895da39da8/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Indicator RatingsBold=Current Italics=Desired
FocalTarget
CategoryKey
Attribute
Indicator Poor Fair GoodVery Good
Mangrove Forest
SizeHabitat
Size
% of original forest
51-75
Viability Ratings for Mangrove Forest
Viability Assessment
![Page 37: 1B. Viability Assessment and Goals](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813b00550346895da39da8/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Indicator RatingsBold=Current Italics=Desired
FocalTarget
CategoryKey
Attribute
Indicator Poor Fair GoodVery Good
Mangrove Forest
SizeHabitat
Size
% of original forest
< 25 25-50 51-75 > 75
Viability Ratings for Mangrove Forest
Viability Assessment
![Page 38: 1B. Viability Assessment and Goals](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813b00550346895da39da8/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
FocalTarge
t
Category
Key Attribute
Indicator Poor Fair GoodVery Good
Coral Reef
ConditionSpecies
Composition
Viability Ratings for Coral Reef
Viability Assessment
![Page 39: 1B. Viability Assessment and Goals](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813b00550346895da39da8/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
FocalTarge
t
Category
Key Attribute
Indicator Poor Fair GoodVery Good
Coral Reef
ConditionSpecies
Composition
# of Crown of thorns per transect
Viability Ratings for Coral Reef
Note that in this case the indicator is a
threat to the target. That is OK, but
always state the KEA is positive terms – as
an attribute of the target.
Viability Assessment
![Page 40: 1B. Viability Assessment and Goals](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813b00550346895da39da8/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Indicator Ratings
FocalTarge
t
Category
Key Attribute
Indicator Poor Fair GoodVery Good
Coral Reef
ConditionSpecies
Composition
# of Crown of thorns per transect
Some None
Viability Ratings for Coral Reef
Viability Assessment
![Page 41: 1B. Viability Assessment and Goals](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813b00550346895da39da8/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Indicator Ratings
FocalTarge
t
Category
Key Attribute
Indicator Poor Fair GoodVery Good
Coral Reef
ConditionSpecies
Composition
# of Crown of thorns per transect
Some None
Current Status Some
Desired Future Status None
Viability Ratings for Coral Reef
Viability Assessment
![Page 42: 1B. Viability Assessment and Goals](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813b00550346895da39da8/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Indicator Ratings
FocalTarge
t
Category
Key Attribute
Indicator Poor Fair GoodVery Good
Coral Reef
ConditionSpecies
Composition
# of Crown of thorns per transect
4+ 1-3 0
Current Status 2
Desired Future Status 0
Viability Ratings for Coral Reef
Viability Assessment
![Page 43: 1B. Viability Assessment and Goals](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813b00550346895da39da8/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
From Viability Assessment in Indonesian Village
Indicator RatingsBold=Current Italics=Desired
FocalTarget
Category Key Attribute Indicator Poor Fair GoodVery Good
Catches from the
Sea
• Catches from the Sea identified as a focal target for fish caught for local consumption and sale
• Key attribute & indicator selected• Fisherman observe that catch is much less than they
remember in recent times• Current status considered not viable (Fair)
XPopulation size
Fish catch per day
Size
Viability Assessment
![Page 44: 1B. Viability Assessment and Goals](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813b00550346895da39da8/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
From Viability Assessment in Indonesian Village
Indicator RatingsBold=Current Italics=Desired
FocalTarget
Category Key Attribute Indicator Poor Fair GoodVery Good
Catches from the
Sea
11-30 strings of fish
Population size
Fish catch per day (# of strings of fish over min size)
Size
• Interviews indicate current harvest < 30 strings of fish over minimum catch size
• Ten years ago, harvest yielded up to 200 strings of fish over minimum catch size
• > 100 considered Very Good
• 31-100 considered Good
> 100 strings of fish
31-100 strings of fish
<10 strings of fish
Viability Assessment
![Page 45: 1B. Viability Assessment and Goals](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813b00550346895da39da8/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
This Presentation
• What is viability assessment?• How to do viability assessment• Additional examples of viability assessment• Advice for doing viability assessment
Viability Assessment
![Page 46: 1B. Viability Assessment and Goals](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813b00550346895da39da8/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
CONDITIONSIZE
LANDSCAPECONTEXT
CONDITIONSIZE
LANDSCAPECONTEXT
Target A Viability
Target B Viability
Target C Viability
Target D
Viability
CONDITIONSIZE
LANDSCAPECONTEXT
CONDITIONSIZE
LANDSCAPECONTEXT
Biodiversity Health or Landscape Functionality
Overall “Picture” of Project Viability
Viability Assessment
![Page 47: 1B. Viability Assessment and Goals](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813b00550346895da39da8/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
Key Words for This Process
“Representative & Encompass”
Indicators → Key Attributes →Conservation Targets →
Biodiversity at Site
Viability Assessment
![Page 48: 1B. Viability Assessment and Goals](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813b00550346895da39da8/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
Tips for Selecting KEAs
• Pick factors that are critical for long-term viability – characteristics that, if degraded, would seriously jeopardize the target’s ability to persist for 100+ years
• When in doubt, pick characteristics that are likely to be affected by human activities
• Look for a few really key ecological attributes… versus many desirable or descriptive characteristics
Key ecological attributes are what’s important…
Viability Assessment
![Page 49: 1B. Viability Assessment and Goals](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813b00550346895da39da8/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
Tips for Selecting Indicators
Look for indicators that:•Strongly relate to the status of the key ecological attribute•Are efficient & affordable to measure•Can reasonably define what constitutes “Good”
Desirable indicators ...•Might provide an early warning to serious stresses•Might assess two or more key ecological attributes
e.g. Presence of young cypress in a floodplain forest as an indicator for both hydrological regime & reproduction of dominant species
Viability Assessment
![Page 50: 1B. Viability Assessment and Goals](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813b00550346895da39da8/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
Be Prepared to Accept Uncertainty!!
• The main purpose of viability assessment is capturing the current state of knowledge
• Don’t worry about information gaps• Don’t focus on filling out all indicator ratings!• Viability assessment is an iterative process with
successive approximations. You can return during later planning stages to add more detail (if necessary)
Viability Assessment
![Page 51: 1B. Viability Assessment and Goals](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813b00550346895da39da8/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
Target Category KEA Indicator
grassland - Type X
Landscape Context
fire regime fire frequency
1st Pass Table
• Grassland target identified• Fire regime = Key Attribute (Landscape Context)• Fire frequency = Indicator• Dense woody cover suggests not enough fire
Be Prepared to Accept Uncertainty!!
Viability Assessment
![Page 52: 1B. Viability Assessment and Goals](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813b00550346895da39da8/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
Indicator Ratings
Target Category KEA Indicator Poor Fair Good Very
Good
grassland - Type X
Landscape Context
fire regime fire frequency
not
enough fire
1st Pass Table
• Grassland focal target identified• Fire regime = Key Attribute (Landscape Context)• Fire frequency = Indicator• Dense woody cover suggests not enough fire• Current status deemed not viable - assigned “Fair”
Be Prepared to Accept Uncertainty!!
Viability Assessment
![Page 53: 1B. Viability Assessment and Goals](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813b00550346895da39da8/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
Indicator Ratings
Target Category KEA Indicator Poor Fair Good Very
Good
grassland - Type X
Landscape Context
fire regime fire frequency
not
enough fire
grassland - Type X
Landscape Context
fire regimefire frequency
> 10 years
5-10 years
2nd Pass Table
Phone call to local grassland expert indicates natural fire frequency of 5-10 years
Be Prepared to Accept Uncertainty!!
Viability Assessment
![Page 54: 1B. Viability Assessment and Goals](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813b00550346895da39da8/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
Indicator Ratings
Target Category KEA Indicator Poor Fair Good Very
Good
grassland - Type X
Landscape Context
fire regime fire frequency
not
enough fire
grassland - Type X
Landscape Context
fire regimefire frequency
> 10 years
5-10 years
grassland - Type X
Landscape Context
fire regime
% grassland w/ 5-10 yr fire return
<25% 25-50% 51-75% >75%
3rd Pass Table
% area burned at acceptable frequency is key
Be Prepared to Accept Uncertainty!!
Viability Assessment
![Page 55: 1B. Viability Assessment and Goals](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813b00550346895da39da8/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
Incomplete is OK!
Indicator RatingsBold=Current Italics=Desired
FocalTarget
Category Key Attribute Indicator Poor Fair Good Very Good
grassland - Type X
Size
Size/extent of characteristic communities / ecosystems
aerial extent in acres
> 100,000
acres
How important is it to fill out all ratings in this case
where Current & Desired status is Very Good?
Probably Not Important!- Unless grassland area is threatened by large-scale habitat destruction. - In this case, determining the Fair rating might guide efforts to determine how much to save
Viability Assessment
![Page 56: 1B. Viability Assessment and Goals](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813b00550346895da39da8/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
Where to get more info…
• Examples: TNC Conpro database (TNC) - http://conpro.tnc.org
Viability Assessment
![Page 57: 1B. Viability Assessment and Goals](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813b00550346895da39da8/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
This Presentation
• What is viability assessment?• How to do viability assessment• Additional examples of viability assessment• Advice for doing viability assessment
Viability Assessment
![Page 58: 1B. Viability Assessment and Goals](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813b00550346895da39da8/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
• Key Ecological Attributes – important characteristics of targets
• Indicators – what you actually measure
• “Reduce, reuse, recycle” KEAs if one will work for more than one target
• Rating is important (especially Good versus Fair)
• Viability assessment is iterative - if in doubt, just try it...
ViabilityKey Points