(J4/IU/2(J12 13:18 FAX 250 847 2165 SMITHERS SECONDARY SCH. lOOl/0O7

Fax Cover PageSmithers SecondaryBox 849, Smithers, BC V0J 2N0

Tel: (250) 847-2231 • Fax: (250) 847-2165

No. of pages including this page:

Date:

To: JRbCjE t\) fli&RN CjAJAYiiNT Fax No. f-a88&QQ

Attention:

From: ‘4-y ?T44

E- N.c4..

Comments:

Wf(o tt(V:—

t*.c j?ry

.1!.!’

E.?F( ‘L5 ‘[J OC(CJ1 )

..

17hk

YOT’-I Fb& A geri.

APR—10—2012 14:24 250 847 2166 98 P.001

(A40677)

04/10/2012 13:18 FAX 250 847 2165 SMITHERS SECONDARY SCM. 1j002/007

Arctica

From: “Gateway Process Advisor [CEAA]” <GatewayProcessAdvisorceaa-acee.gc.ca>

Date: April-05-12 7:56 AMTo; <antarcticaxpIomet.corn>Cc: “Louise Niro” <Louise.Nironeb-one.gc.ca’Attach: Notice of Motion Template.pdfSubject: RE: Confusion Over Joint Review Panel Hearing Registration

Hello Ms. Cunningham,I am a process advisor with the joint Review Panel, and my colleague, Louise Niro, has forwarded your

message to me for response. We spoke on the telephone last week regarding your situation. In order for the

Panel to consider your request, you need to submit It as a “motion”, which is the formal way of requesting a

decision from the Panel. There is a specific format that needs to be used for a motion, and I have attached it to

this message for your use.

Once you have reformatted your request as outlined in the Notice of Motion template, you need to submit it to

the Panel using one of the following processes. The Panel does not accept submissions via email, so you need to

use one of the following processes:

1) you can submit your motion electronically using the electronic submission process that is available throughthe Panel’s website at the following link: http:J/gatewavpanehreview-examen.gc.ca/clfnsiJprtcptngprcss/sbmtdcmtlctrncll-eng.html, Please note that you will need to convert your document to pdfformat prior to submission. Once you submit your motion, you will receive an email receipt that you will needto print and sign. You then need to send the signed email receipt along with a hard copy of your motion to thefollowing address:Secretary to the Joint Review PanelJoint Review Panel - Enbridge Northern Gateway Project444 Seventh Avenue S.W,Calgary, Alberta T2P 0X8

2) you can mail a hard copy of your motion to the address above.

3) you can fax a copy of your motion to the following toll-free fax number: 1-877-288-8803. Please clearlyindicate on your fax that your submission is regarding the Enbridge Northern Gateway Joint Review Panel.

If you have any other questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at the coordinates below.

Best Regards,Colette

Colette SpagnuoloProcess Advisor, Northern Gateway Project I Conseillère en processus, projet Northern GatewayEnbrldge Northern Gateway Joint Review Panel Secretariat Secretariat de Ia Commissiond’examen conjoint du projet Enbridge Northern Gateway22nd Floor, 160 Elgin St. Ottawa ON K1A 0H3 22em etage, 160, rue Elgin, Ottawa ON K1A 0F13GatewayProcessAdvisor@ceaa-acee.gc. caTelephone Téléphone 1-866-582-1884Facsimile I Télécopieur 613-957-0941Government of Canada I Gouvernement du Canada

o you really need to print this e-mail2 PleGse think of the environmentl I Avez-vous réellement besoind’imprimer ce courriel S.V.P. Pensons a lenvironriementl

09/04/2012APR—10—2012 14:24 250 847 2165 S8< P.002

(A40677)

04/10/2012 13:18 FAX 250 847 2165 SMITHERS SECONDARY SCH. Ij0O3/007

MAIL ROOMFrom: Arctica fmailto:antarctica©xplornet.com] SALLE DE COURIERSent: April 04, 2012 811 PMTo: Louise Niro Z1IZ R 0 P 2 2Subject: Confusion Over Joint Review Panel Hearing RegistrationImportance: High NEB/ONEArctica Cunningham10771 Lawson RoadTelkwa, BCVOJ 2X3

April 4, 2012

Attention: Louise Niro (1ouise.nironeb-one.gc. ca)Regulatory OfficerNational Energy Board

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing to you requesting permission to register late for the Joint Review Panel

hearing in Smithers, British Columbia. The reason why I did not register in time for the

October 6, 2011 deadline was because I was under the impression that I was registered as a

part of the group “Youth For A Better World.” When we registered, our group was not made

aware of the fact that each individual speaker needed to register, and that fact only became

known to us a few days ago. Two other members of the group had already registered before

we decided to speak as a group, but I did not think I needed to register, as I believed that I

would be able to give my input as a part of our group presentation.

I am asking that my name be added to the list of speakers, if possible, as a part of the

group “Youth For A Better World.” While I would defmitely appreciate getting my own ten

minutes to speak, if that is not possible, the other members of my group are willing to share

their time with me, which totals thirty minutes, so that I can give my input on the project, as

well.

I plan to discuss how politically incorrect the approach to this project has been, as

09/04/20 12APR—10—2012 14:25 250 847 2166 97Z P.003

(A40677)

U4/IO/U12 13:1 FAX 250 847 2165 SMITHERS SECONDARY SC 1jOO4/0O7

well as the threat the project will have on my way of life, and how it will potentially

deter me from returning to live in the Buildey Valley after I complete my post-secondary

education. I would really appreciate the opportunity to give my evidence and have my voice

heard, as I have been under the impression I would have the chance to do so since October.

Thank you very much for your consideration in this matter, and I look forward to

receiving your reply as soon as possible. Please e-mail your decision to me at

antarctica@xplornet.com.

Sincerely,

Arctica CunninghamGrade 11 Student at Smithers Secondary SchoolMember of Youth For A Better World

09/04/2012APR—10—2012 14:25 250 847 2165 P.004

(A40677)

— i ‘..,, ut ,ttjjnrji. ui’I,tuI ,n. WjUU/UU(

Notice of MotionThe use of this format is required for all Notice of Motion requests.

Name ofperson bringing motion: ArdLo... (Th.in fling

Decision or order requested:.I am requesting permission to register to speak at the Joint Review Panel

bearing regarding the proposed Northern Gateway Pipeline Project to be held in Sinithers, British Columbia basedon the &ct that I was under the impression until very recently that I had already properly registered to speak. —

_AçciI iO,Wi2..Date submitted

Z)Signature

Arcfca.- CqklfiiPrint Name

Please attach all materials in support of your motion, including the following:1. Concise statement of relevant facts2. The grounds for your request (why the Panel should make this decision or order)

3. Detailed description of the decision or order sought4. Information supporting your request5. If case law is being relied on, a case book with the specific passages of the cases

bighlighted or side-barred

Please refer to the National Energy Board Rules ofPractice andProcedure. 1995, rule 35, forfurther information.

OH-4-201 I

APR—10—2012 14:25 250 847 2165 P.006

(A40677)

O4/IU/U12 13:19 FAX 250 847 2165 SMITHERS SECONDARY SCH. 1j0O6/0O7

Motion by Arctica CunninghamRegarding request to register to speak at the Northern Gateway Pipeline Joint Review Panel Hearing in Smithers, BC

1. Statement of Relevant Facts:

When we registered our group Youthfor a Better World to speak regarding the proposedNorthern Gateway Pipeline at the upcoming hearing in Smithers, BC, we were not made aware ofthe fact that each individual speaker needed to register separately. Two other members of my grouphad already registered before we signed up to speak as a group, but I did not think I needed toregister individually, as it was our understanding that I would be able to give my input as a part ofour group presentation. The requirement for individual registration only recently became known tous, at which point I immediately phoned and had a conversation with Colette Spagnuolo, a ProcessAdvisor for the Northern Gateway Project, who advised me to e-mail the review panel, requesting tobe registered now. I would greatly appreciate the opportunity to have my voice heard, as I havebelieved I would have the chance to do since registering Youthfor a Better World to speak lastOctober.

2. Grounds for my reQuest (why the Panel should make this decision:

The reason why I did not register in. time for the October 6, 2011 deadline was because I was underthe impression that I was registered to speak as a part of the group Youth For A Better World. I haveintended to speak at the hearing since last fall, which can be substantiated by the comments printedin the Globe and Mail, as provided in point #4 of this document. It is important that I be allowed tospeak with my group, as we have each prepared our own thoughts to add to the debate.

3. Detailed description of the decision sought:

I am asking that my name be added to the list of speakers scheduled to speak during the morning ofApril 24, 2012 at the Joint Review Panel hearing in Smithers, BC regarding the proposed NorthernGateway Pipeline project. While I would definitely appreciate getting my own ten minutes to speak,if that is not possible, the other members of my group are willing to share their time with me (whichtotals thirty minutes) so that I can give my input regarding the pipeline proposal. The other membersof the Youthfor a Better World group registered to speak are: Perry Rath (our group contact person),Skeena Lawson, and Laura Anderson. iplanto discuss why the approach to this project has beenpolitically incorrect, as well as the threat the project will have on my way of life, and how it willpotentially deter me from returning to live in the Bulkley Valley after I complete my post-secondaryeducation. -

4. Information suDDorting my request:

In October 2011, I was interviewed and quoted by the Globe and Mail regarding my intent to speakabout the proposed Northern Gateway Pipeline project, and my comments reflect my firmunderstanding that I was registered and would definitely be speaking to the review panel.The article can be found at the following link: http://www.theglobeandmail.comlglobeinvestor/thousands-to-speak-on-proposed-northem-gateway-pipeline/article22O5O21 /For your convenience, I have included a copy of the article, and I have underlined and put into boldfont the relevant comments that support my claim. As indicated in the article, I was completelyunder the impression that I was properly registered and would be allowed time to speak at thehearing.

APR—10—2012 14:25 250 847 2165 P.006

(A40677)

04/10/2012 13:19 FAX 250 847 2165 SMITHERS SECONDARY Sd. 1IOO7/0O7

Motion by Arctica CunninghamRegarding request to register to speak at the Northern Gateway Pipeline Joint Review Panel Hearing in Smithers, BC

Globe and MailOctober 18, 2011

Thousands to speak on proposed Northern Gateway pipeline

John Cotter

The Canadian Press

More than 4,000 people and groups have registered to speak at bearings into a proposed pipeline thatwould ship crude from Alberta’s oil sands to fill supertankers on the British Columbia coast,

Opponents of the $5.5-billion Enbridge Inc. Northern Gateway pipeline hope the surge of publicinterest will pressure Ottawa not to approve the project.

Community hearings are to start in January. Each person will be given 10 minutes to speak.

Dana Adams is one of the people who has registered and says she is eager to tell a federal reviewpanel what she thinks.

“I think this is an environmental disaster waiting to happen,” said Ms. Adams, who is the chef andowner of Queen B’s Cafe in Queen Charlotte, B.C.

Ms. Adams worries an oil tanker could run aground and foul the pristine coastal waters similar towhat happened in 1989 when the Exxon Valdez hit a reef in Alaska.

“We are right on the water and it is gorgeous. For me it is too much to lose if we do have a spill.”

Calgary-based Enbridge says it welcomes public input, but is concerned the process could bog down.

Enbridge spokesman Paul Stanway said the project is already eight months to a year behind. Ifapproved, it’s possible the startup date for the pipeline could be pushed beyond 2017.

He said Enbridge is also concerned people could be manipulated by groups that hope to turnNorthern Gateway into an anti-oils ands battleground similar to the Keystone XL pipeline debate inthe United States.

“There is no question that the groups internationally who are opposed to the development of oilsands oil are focused on both projects,” Mr. Stanway said.

“if this is a genuine expression of public interest, we have no concerns about that at all. What wouldbe a concern is if this is a strategy being employed by political activists to try and undermine theregulatory process.”

A Victoria-based group called the Dogwood Initiative is claiming some credit for the number ofpeople who have registered to speak at the hearings.

APR—10--2012 14:25 250 847 2165 97 P.007

(A40677)