19dec12 daylight & sunlight report -...

Malcolm Hollis LLP The Lexicon, 10-12 Mount Street, Manchester M2 5NT T 0161 832 7031 F 0161 828 0500 W malcolmhollis.com Malcolm Hollis LLP, a Limited Liability Partnership. Registered in England and Wales number OC314362. Registered office: 5 Brooks Court, Kirtling Street, London SW8 5BP. VAT number 863 8914 80. A list of members is available from our registered office.

Daylight and Sunlight Report for the Proposed Woodlands Development at Mottram Road, Stalybridge, Manchester

Pre

pa

red

for

Pe

rsim

mo

n H

om

es

NW

Lim

ited

Da

ylig

ht

an

d S

un

ligh

t R

ep

ort

fo

r th

e P

rop

ose

d

Wo

od

lan

ds

De

velo

pm

en

t a

t M

ott

ram

Ro

ad

, St

aly

brid

ge

, Ma

nc

he

ste

r

Prepared for Persimmon Homes NW Limited

Prepared by Sam Wallis BSc (Hons) MRICS

Date 19 December 2012

Reference 32481/IM/SBW

Daylight and Sunlight Report for the Proposed Woodland 1 Ref. 32481/JSO/SBW Development at Mottram Road, Stalybridge 06 December 2012

Contents Page

1.� Executive Summary....................................................................................................................... 2�

1.1� Scope .................................................................................................................................... 2�1.2� Assessment Criteria .............................................................................................................. 2�1.3� Summary of Analysis of Daylight and Sunlight for the New Development ..................... 2�1.4� Overall ................................................................................................................................... 2�

2.� Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 4�

2.1� Scope .................................................................................................................................... 4�2.2� Planning Policy ..................................................................................................................... 4�2.3� Assessment Criteria .............................................................................................................. 4�2.4� Limitations ............................................................................................................................. 4�

3.� Assessment & Results – Daylighting & Sunlighting issues in the New Development ................. 6�

3.1� Internal Daylight ................................................................................................................... 6�3.2� Internal Sunlight .................................................................................................................... 9�

Appendix A Tests to be Applied Appendix B Context Drawings Appendix C Window/Room Reference Drawings Appendix D Daylight Study Appendix E Sunlight Study


1. Executive Summary

1.1 Scope

1.1.1 We have been instructed by Mr John Booth of Persimmon Homes NW Limited to determine whether the proposed development will receive sufficient daylight and sunlight, following a request from Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council.

1.2 Assessment Criteria

1.2.1 To ensure that this assessment can be appropriately evaluated against Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council’s planning policy, daylight and sunlight calculations have been undertaken in accordance with the Building Research Establishment Report ‘Site Layout Planning for Daylight and Sunlight – A Guide to Good Practice’ 2nd Edition, 2011(the “BRE guide”) and also British Standard 8206 – 2: 2008 – ‘Lighting for Buildings – Part 2: Code of Practice for Daylighting’, to which the BRE guide refers. The standards and tests applied within this assessment are briefly described in Appendix A.

1.3 Summary of Analysis of Daylight and Sunlight for the New Development

1.3.1 Internal Daylight

All of the proposed houses will meet the ADF and DD target values, with the trees in bare branch. 92% and 91% of the rooms tested to the apartments for ADF and DD respectively, with the trees in bare branch, will meet or exceed the BRE target values.

1.3.2 Internal Sunlight

Of the 11 living rooms assessed to the houses, 7 will meet the BRE target values with 4 falling short. 3 of the living rooms that fall short of the target values do not face within 90 degrees of due south, and so do not have a reasonable expectation of direct sunlight. The remaining living room, to plot 23, will fall only marginally short of the BRE target values. Of the 14 living rooms assessed to the apartment block B, all will meet the BRE target value. Of the 12 living rooms assessed to the apartment block A, 7 will meet the BRE target value, with 5 living rooms falling marginally short. On this basis of the mitigating factors discussed in the report, a flexible approach to applying the BRE target criteria may be deemed appropriate.

1.4 Overall

1.4.1 The results on balance are considered acceptable and should be viewed with the following material considerations:

• The presence of the mature trees, whilst having an impact daylight and sunlight availability, gives the development a ‘mature’ appearance


• It is apparent that the development has been carefully designed, utilising the mitigation factors set out in detail in the BRE guidance. On this basis, a flexible approach to applying the BRE target values may be deemed appropriate.


2. Introduction

2.1 Scope

2.1.1 We have been instructed by Mr John Booth of Persimmon Homes NW Limited to determine whether the proposed development will receive sufficient daylight and sunlight.

2.2 Planning Policy

2.2.1 Although no standards have been formally adopted within Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council’s Unitary Development Plan (UDP), it is accepted that daylight and sunlight amenity needs to be reviewed objectively. This Report is therefore based on the following standards, which are the accepted standards for assessing daylight and sunlight:

• Building Research Establishment (BRE) Report “Site Layout Planning for Daylight and Sunlight – a guide to good practice, 2nd Edition, 2011” (“the BRE guide”)

• BS8206 – Part 2: 2008 Code of Practice for Daylighting

2.2.2 Due to the presence of extensive trees on the development site, the Supplementary Planning Document (SPD) – Trees and Landscaping on Development Sites, adopted in March 2007, has also been considered. The following guidance is provided:

[Developments should] ensure that landscaping, tree planting and ecological requirements are considered as an integral part of the design process on new development sites and not as an afterthought. [Developments should] integrate existing trees and landscaping on development sites into new development schemes. 6.0 Part II- Existing Trees in Development - [Supplements UDP Policy N5] The Importance of Trees on Development Sites 6.2 The retention of trees, and other natural features, within new and existing developments provide immediate enhancement and an element of instant impact and visual maturity to a site and its surroundings, raising the overall quality of a new development

2.3 Assessment Criteria

2.3.1 To ensure that this assessment can be appropriately evaluated against best practice standards, daylight and sunlight calculations have been undertaken in accordance with the ‘BRE guide’ and also on BS8206–2: 2008 to which the BRE guide refers. The standards and tests applied are briefly described in Appendix A.

2.4 Limitations

2.4.1 We refer you to our daylighting and sunlighting limitations, as provided with our fee proposal.


2.4.2 Our assessment is based on the scheme drawings produced and provided by Persimmon Homes NW Limited, as listed below:

Drawing Number Revision Title Date

WLS-PL.001 A Planning Layout Dec 2012

- - Woodchester with Gable Plans & Elevations Dec 2012

- - Barrington Plans & Elevations Dec 2012

- - Apartment Block Type A1 to A6 Dec 2012

- - Apartment Block Type B1 to B6 Dec 2012

4072.05 TPP - Draft Tree Protection Plans Dec 2012

2.4.3 The BRE guide states that sometimes, trees should be taken into account, e.g. where

a new dwelling is proposed near to large existing trees. This is to ensure that future occupants of the dwellings do not want the trees to be cut down if they block too much daylight and sunlight. As there are numerous varieties and sizes of existing trees on the site, we have utilised an average transmittance value, for a typical deciduous native tree taken from Table H1, at Appendix H, in the BRE guide. In line with the BRE guide, the newly planted trees have been excluded from our assessment.

Transparencies of Tree Crown to Solar Radiation

Common Name Transparency (% Radiation Passing)

Full Leaf Bare Branch

Horse Chestnut 20 55

2.4.4 For the APSH sunlight test, the bare branch transmittance value has been utilised for

the winter sunlight hours, and the full leaf transmittance value has been utilised for the remaining annual sunlight hours.


3. Assessment & Results – Daylighting & Sunlighting issues in the New Development

3.1 Internal Daylight

3.1.1 ADF tests have been undertaken to the principal habitable rooms within the proposed development, bathrooms, halls and circulation space have been omitted from our assessment.

3.1.2 The full ADF test results are shown in full in Appendix D. Below is a summary of our findings: In accordance with the BRE guide (see also Appendix A)

Building Ref

Average Daylight Factor Test in Full Leaf

No. of Rooms No. of Rooms Passed

No. of Rooms Failed

Apartments A1-A6 35 24 11

Apartments B1-B6 40 29 11

Plot 13 8 7 1

Plot 14 8 6 2

Plot 15 8 7 1

Plot 16 8 8 0

Plot 17 7 7 0

Plot 18 7 7 0

Plot 19 8 8 0

Plot 20 7 7 0

Plot 21 7 7 0

Plot 22 8 8 0

Plot 23 8 8 0

Total 159 73 26

Building Ref

Average Daylight Factor Test in Bare Branch


No. of Rooms Failed



Plot 13 8 8 0

Plot 14 8 8 0

Plot 15 8 8 0

Plot 16 8 8 0

Plot 17 7 7 0


Building Ref

Average Daylight Factor Test in Bare Branch


No. of Rooms Failed

Plot 18 7 7 0

Plot 19 8 8 0

Plot 20 7 7 0

Plot 21 7 7 0

Plot 22 8 8 0

Plot 23 8 8 0

Total 159 153 6

3.1.3 In relation to the houses, all will pass the ADF when the trees are in bare branch, with some minor transgressions noted when the trees are in full leaf. In therefore can be said that any rooms that fail to meet the BRE guide do so as a result of the existing surrounding trees, rather than the design of the proposed development.

3.1.4 The council recognise that the retention of mature trees, and other natural features, within new developments provide immediate enhancement and an element of instant impact and visual maturity to a site and its surroundings, raising the overall quality of a new development. As a result it may be considered that these minor failures are unimportant, when considering the benefit of the mature trees on the development site, and the potential occupiers.

3.1.5 This is further apparent when reviewing the specific Hurst Hill Crescent Ashton case study, provided by the council in their supplementary guidance document. This development provides a good mix of trees and soft landscaping to soften and integrate the development into its surroundings Retaining existing trees where possible gives a new development a ‘mature’ appearance.

3.1.6 Although the results indicate that 92% of the rooms tested in the proposed apartments will meet the ADF minima target criteria as defined by the BRE guidance, six rooms to the apartment blocks will fall short of the ADF target values with the trees in bare branch.

3.1.7 These living/kitchen/diners will receive ADF values of between 1.41% and 1.9% with the trees in bare branch, against the higher kitchen ADF target of 2%. All rooms, with the exception of one, would meet the lower ADF target for living rooms.

3.1.8 Given that the large majority of rooms to the apartment blocks will pass the target values, it may be said that the design has adequately considered the daylight amenity of the potential occupiers.


3.1.9 The Daylight Distribution (DD) test results are shown in full in Appendix D. Below is a summary of our findings:

Building Ref

Daylight Distribution Test in Full Leaf


No. of Rooms Failed



Plot 13 8 8 0

Plot 14 8 8 0

Plot 15 8 8 0

Plot 16 8 8 0

Plot 17 7 7 0

Plot 18 7 7 0

Plot 19 8 8 0

Plot 20 7 7 0

Plot 21 7 7 0

Plot 22 8 8 0

Plot 23 8 8 0

Total 159 150 9

Building Ref

Daylight Distribution Test in Bare Branch


No. of Rooms Failed



Plot 13 8 8 0

Plot 14 8 8 0

Plot 15 8 8 0

Plot 16 8 8 0

Plot 17 7 7 0

Plot 18 7 7 0

Plot 19 8 8 0

Plot 20 7 7 0

Plot 21 7 7 0

Plot 22 8 8 0

Plot 23 8 8 0

Total 159 152 7


3.1.10 All of the rooms tested to the houses will meet the target values set out in the BRE guidelines, both with the trees in full leaf and in bare branch.

3.1.11 The results to the apartment blocks indicate that the large majority of rooms will pass the BRE guidelines however, 7 rooms will fall short of the BRE target values with the trees in full leaf, with 5 of these rooms falling short with the trees in bare branch.

3.1.12 The rooms will only marginally fall short of the values, with daylight distributions of between 71.1% and 78.5%, against the BRE target of 80%. Due to these marginal deviations, and the fact that the large majority of rooms will pass the target values, these failures may not be considered important.

3.2 Internal Sunlight

3.2.1 APSH tests have been undertaken to a sample of the principal habitable rooms within the proposed development. The full APSH test results are shown in full in Appendix E. Below is a summary of our findings:

Property Ref No. of Rooms Tested

No. of Rooms Passed APSH

Test

No. of Rooms Failed APSH

Test



Plot 13 1 1 0

Plot 14 1 1 0

Plot 15 1 1 0

Plot 16 1 1 0

Plot 17 1 1 0

Plot 18 1 1 0

Plot 19 1 1 0

Plot 20 1 0 1

Plot 21 1 0 1

Plot 22 1 0 1

Plot 23 1 0 1

Total 37 28 9 3.2.2 Of the 11 living rooms assessed to the houses, 7 will meet the BRE target values with 4

falling short. 3 of the living rooms that fall short of the target values do not face within 90 degrees of due south, and so do not have a reasonable expectation of direct sunlight. These properties have south facing gardens, and so will have access to well sunlighted amenity space, along with other well sunlighted rooms within each house.

3.2.3 The remaining living room, to plot 23, will fall only marginally short of the BRE target values.


3.2.4 The BRE guide recognises that the overall sunlighting potential of a large residential development may be limited to certain properties. Where this is unavoidable, there should be some compensating factor, such as an appealing view to the north, or in this instance, a south facing garden.

3.2.5 Of the 14 living rooms assessed to the apartment block B, all will meet the BRE target value. Of the 12 living rooms assessed to the apartment block A, 7 will meet the BRE target value, with 5 living rooms falling marginally short.

3.2.6 The BRE guide states that it may not be possible for developments of flats, especially with site constraints, to have every living room facing within 90 degrees of due south. The design should be approached so that consideration is given to maximising the number of living rooms that meet the target values.

3.2.7 The BRE guide further states that living rooms in flats should also be placed at the end corners of the building and hence be dual aspect. That way, living rooms on the north side of the building can also have an east- or west-facing window, which can receive some sun.

3.2.8 It is apparent that the development has been carefully designed, utilising the mitigation factors set out in detail in the BRE guidance. On this basis, a flexible approach to applying the BRE target values may be deemed appropriate.

Appendix A

Tests to be Applied

Introduction The main purpose of the guidelines in the Building Research Establishment Report “Site Layout Planning for Daylight and Sunlight – a guide to good practice 2011, 2nd Edition” (“the BRE guide”) is to assist in the consideration of the relationship of new and existing buildings to ensure that each retains a potential to achieve good daylighting and sunlighting levels. That is, by following and satisfying the tests contained in the guidelines, new and existing buildings should be sufficiently spaced apart in relation to their relative heights so that both have the potential to achieve good levels of daylight and sunlight. The guidelines have been drafted primarily for use with low density suburban developments and should therefore be used flexibly when dealing with dense urban sites and extensions to existing buildings, a fact recognised by the BRE Report’s author in the Introduction where Dr Paul Littlefair says: ‘The Guide is intended for building designers and their clients, consultants and planning officials. The advice given here is not mandatory and the guide should not been seen as an instrument of planning policy; its aim is to help rather than constrain the designer. Although it gives numerical guidelines, these should be interpreted flexibly since natural lighting is only one of many factors in site layout design…… In special circumstances the developer or planning authority may wish to use different target values. For example, in a historic city centre, or in an area with modern high rise buildings, a higher degree of obstruction may be unavoidable if new developments are to match the height and proportions of existing buildings…..’

In many cases in low-rise housing, meeting the criteria for daylight and sunlight may mean that the BRE criteria for other amenity considerations such as privacy and sense of enclosure are also satisfied. The BRE guide states that recommended minimum privacy distances (in cases where windows of habitable rooms face each other in low-rise residential property), as defined by each individual Local Authority’s policies, vary widely, from 18-35m1. For two-storey properties a spacing within this range would almost certainly also satisfy the BRE guide’s daylighting requirements as it complies with the 250 rule and will almost certainly satisfy the ‘Three times height’ test too (as discussed more fully below). However, the specific context of each development will be taken into account and Local Authorities may relax the stated minimum, for instance, in built-up areas where this would lead to an inefficient use of land. Conversely, greater distances may be required between higher buildings, in order to satisfy daylighting and sunlighting requirements. It is important to recognize also that privacy can also be achieved by other means: design, orientation and screening can all play a key role and may also contribute towards reducing the theoretical ‘minimum’ distance.

A sense of enclosure is also important as the perceived quality of an outdoor space may be reduced if it is too large in the context of the surrounding buildings. In urban settings the BRE guide suggests a spacing-to-height ratio of 2.5:1 would provide a comfortable environment, whilst not obstructing too much natural light: this ratio also approximates the 250 rule. Daylight The criteria for protecting daylight to existing buildings are contained in Section 2.2 and Appendix C of the BRE guide. There are various methods of measuring and assessing daylight and the choice of test depends on the circumstances of each particular window. For example, greater protection should be afforded to windows which serve habitable dwellings and, in particular, those serving living rooms and family kitchens, with a lower requirement required for bedrooms. The BRE guide states that circulation spaces and bathrooms need not be tested as

1 The commonest minimum privacy distance is 21m (Householder Development Consents Review: Implementation of Recommendations – Department for Communities and Local Government – May 2007)

they are not considered to require good levels of daylight. In addition, for rooms with more than one window, secondary windows do not require assessment if it is established that the room is already sufficiently lit through the principal window. The tests should also be applied to non-domestic uses such as offices and workplaces where such uses will ordinarily have a reasonable expectation of daylight and where the areas may be considered a principal workplace. The BRE has developed a series of tests to determine whether daylighting levels within new developments and rooms within existing buildings surrounding new developments will satisfy or continue to satisfy a range of daylighting criteria Note: Not every single window is assessed separately, only a representative sample, from which conclusions may be drawn regarding other nearby dwellings . Daylighting Tests ‘Three times height’ test - If the distance of each part of the new development from the existing windows is three or more times its height above the centre of the existing window then loss of light to the existing windows need not be analysed. If the proposed development is taller or closer than this then the 250 test will need to be carried out. 250 test – a very simple test that should only be used where the proposed development is of a reasonably uniform profile and is directly opposite the existing building. Its use is most appropriate for low density well-spaced developments such as new sub-urban housing schemes and often it is not a particularly useful tool for assessing urban and in-fill sites. In brief, where the new development subtends to an angle of less than 250 to the centre of the lowest window of an existing neighbouring building, it is unlikely to have a substantial effect on the diffuse skylight enjoyed by the existing building. Equally, the new development itself is also likely to have the potential for good daylighting. If the angle is more than 250 then more detailed tests are required, as outlined below. VSC Test - the VSC is a unit of measurement that represents the amount of available daylight from the sky, received at a particular window. It is measured on the outside face of the window. The ‘unit’ is expressed as a percentage as it is the ratio between the amount of sky visible at the given reference point compared to the amount of light that would be available from a totally unobstructed hemisphere of sky. To put this unit of measurement into perspective, the maximum percentage value for a window with a completely unobstructed outlook (i.e. with a totally unobstructed view through 90o in every direction) is 40%. The target figure for VSC recommended by the BRE is 27%. A VSC of 27% is a relatively good level of daylight and the level we would expect to find for habitable rooms with windows on principal elevations. However, this level is often difficult to achieve on secondary elevations and in built-up urban environments. For comparison, a window receiving 27% VSC is approximately equivalent to a window that would have a continuous obstruction opposite it which subtends an angle of 25o (i.e. the same results as would be found utilising the 250 Test). Where tests show that the new development itself meets the 27% VSC target this is a good indication that the development will enjoy good daylighting and further tests can then be carried out to corroborate this (see under). Through research the BRE have determined that in existing buildings daylight (and sunlight levels) can be reduced by approximately 20% of their original value before the loss is materially noticeable. It is for this reason that they consider that a 20% reduction is permissible in circumstances where the existing VSC value is below the 27% threshold. For existing buildings

once this has been established it is then necessary to determine whether the distribution of daylight inside each room meets the required standards (see under). Daylight Distribution (DD) Test – This test looks at the position of the “No-Sky Line” (NSL) – that is, the line that divides the points on the working plane (0.7m from floor level in offices and 0.85m in dwellings and industrial spaces) which can and cannot see the sky. The BRE guide suggests that areas beyond the NSL may look dark and gloomy compared with the rest of the room and BS8206 states that electric lighting is likely to be needed if a significant part of the working plane (normally no more than 20%) lies beyond it. In new developments no more than 20% of a room’s area should be beyond the NSL. For existing buildings the BRE guide states that if, following the construction of a new development, the NSL moves so that the area beyond the NSL increases by more than 20%, then daylighting is likely to be seriously affected. The guide suggests that in houses, living rooms, dining rooms and kitchens should be tested: bedrooms are deemed less important, although should nevertheless be analysed. In other buildings each main room where daylight is expected should be investigated. ADF Test –The ADF (Average Daylight Factor) test takes account of the interior dimensions and surface reflectance within the room being tested as well as the amount of sky visible from the window. For this reason it is considered a more detailed and representative measure of the adequacy of light. The minimum ADF values recommended in BS8206 Part 2 are: 2% for family kitchens (and rooms containing kitchens); 1.5% for living rooms; and 1% for bedrooms. This is a test used in assessing new developments, although, in certain circumstances, it may be used as a supplementary test in the assessment of daylighting in existing buildings, particularly where more than one window serves a room. Room depth ratio test - This is a test for new developments looking at the relative dimensions of each room (principally its depth) and its window(s) to ensure that the rear half of a room will receive sufficient daylight so as not to appear gloomy. Sunlight Sunlight is an important ‘amenity’ in both domestic and non-domestic settings. The way in which a building’s windows are orientated and the overall position of a building on a site will have an impact on the sunlight it receives but, importantly, will also have an effect on the sunlight neighbouring buildings receive. Unlike daylight, which is non-directional and assumes that light from the sky is uniform, the availability of sunlight is dependent on direction. That is, as the United Kingdom is in the northern hemisphere, we receive virtually all of our sunlight from the south. The availability of sunlight is therefore dependent on the orientation of the window or area of ground being assessed relative to the position of due south. In new developments the BRE guide suggests that dwellings should aim to have at least one main living room which faces the southern or western parts of the sky so as to ensure that it receives a reasonable amount of sunlight. Where groups of dwellings are planned the Guide states that site layout design should aim to maximise the number of dwellings with a main living room that meet sunlight criteria. Where a window wall faces within 900 of due south and no obstruction subtends to angle of more than 250 to the horizontal or where the window wall faces within 200 of due south and the reference point has a VSC of at least 27% then sunlighting will meet the required standards: failing that the Annual Probable Sunlight Hours (APSH) need to be analysed. APSH means the total number of hours in the year that the sun is expected to shine on unobstructed ground, allowing for average levels of cloud for the location in question. If the APSH tests reveal that the new development will receive at least one quarter of the available APSH, including at least 5% of APSH during the winter months (from 21 September to

21 March), then the requirements are satisfied. It should be noted that if a room has two windows on opposite walls, the APSH due to each can be added together. The availability of sunlight is also an important factor when looking at the impact of a proposed development on the existing surrounding buildings. APSH tests will be required where one or more of the following are true: • The ‘Three times height’ test is failed (see ‘Daylight’ above); • The proposed development is situated within 900 of due south of an existing building’s

main window wall and he new building subtends to angle of more than 250 to the horizontal;

• The window wall faces within 200 of due south and a point at the centre of the window on

the outside face of the window wall (the reference point) has a VSC of less than 27%. Where APSH testing is required it is similar to the test for the proposed development. That is to say that compliance will be demonstrated where a room receives: • At least 25% of the APSH (including at least 5% in the winter months), or • At least 0.8 times its former sunlight hours during either period, or • A reduction of no more than 4% APSH over the year . The Guide stresses that the target values it gives are purely advisory, especially in circumstances such as: the presence of balconies (which can overhang windows, obstructing light); when an existing building stands unusually close to the common boundary with the new development and; where the new development needs to match the height and proportion of existing nearby buildings. In circumstances like these a larger reduction in sunlight may be necessary. The sunlight criteria in the BRE guide primarily apply to windows serving living rooms of an existing dwelling. This is in contrast to the daylight criteria which apply to kitchens and bedrooms as well as living rooms. Having said that, the guide goes on to say that care should be taken not to block too much sun from kitchens and bedrooms. Non-domestic buildings which are deemed to have a requirement for sunlight should also be checked. Sunlight – Gardens and Open Spaces As well as ensuring buildings receive a good level of sunlight to their interior spaces, it is also important to ensure that the open spaces between buildings are suitably lit. The recommendations as set out in the BRE guide are meant to ensure that spaces between buildings are not permanently in shade for a large part of the year. Trees and fences over 1.5m tall are also factored into the calculations. The BRE guidelines state that: • For a garden or amenity area to appear adequately sunlit throughout the year, at least

50% of the area should receive at least two hours of sunlight on 21 March; • In addition, if, as result of new development, an existing garden or amenity area does not

reach the area target above and the area which can receive two hours of direct sunlight on 21 March is reduced by more than 20% this loss is likely to be noticeable.

Appendix G of the BRE guidelines describes a methodology for calculating sunlight availability for amenity spaces.

Appendix B

Context Drawings

Appendix C

Window/Room Reference Drawings

Appendix D

Daylight Study

Woodlands, Stalybridge INTERNAL AVERAGE DAYLIGHT FACTOR ANALYSISAnalysed December 2012

Malcolm Hollis LLP

TOTAL PASS/ TOTAL PASS/Room Window Room Use ADF(%) Full Leaf FAIL ADF(%) Bare

BranchFAIL

PLOT 16

Ground FloorR1/10 W3/10 KDR1/10 W4/10 KD 2.57 PASS 2.60 PASSR2/10 W1/10 LIVINGROOM 1.78 PASS 1.79 PASSR3/10 W2/10 STUDY 1.73 PASS 1.76 PASSFirst Floor R1/11 W4/11 BEDROOM 1.58 PASS 1.59 PASSR2/11 W3/11 BEDROOM 2.23 PASS 2.28 PASSR3/11 W2/11 BEDROOM 1.82 PASS 1.86 PASSR4/11 W1/11 BEDROOM 1.82 PASS 1.85 PASSSecond FloorR1/12 W1/12 BEDROOMR1/12 W2/12 BEDROOMR1/12 W3/12 BEDROOM 1.78 PASS 1.79 PASS

PLOT 17

Ground FloorR1/20 W2/20 KDR1/20 W3/20 KD 2.70 PASS 2.70 PASSR2/20 W1/20 LIVINGROOM 1.84 PASS 1.85 PASSFirst FloorR1/21 W4/21 BEDROOM 2.19 PASS 2.19 PASSR2/21 W1/21 BEDROOM 1.85 PASS 1.87 PASSR3/21 W2/21 BEDROOM 1.85 PASS 1.87 PASSR4/21 W3/21 BEDROOM 3.15 PASS 3.16 PASSSecond FloorR1/22 W1/22 BEDROOMR1/22 W2/22 BEDROOMR1/22 W3/22 BEDROOM 2.14 PASS 2.15 PASS

PLOT 18

Ground FloorR1/30 W2/30 KDR1/30 W3/30 KD 2.72 PASS 2.72 PASSR2/30 W1/30 LIVINGROOM 1.84 PASS 1.86 PASSFirst FloorR1/31 W3/31 BEDROOM 2.20 PASS 2.20 PASSR2/31 W1/31 BEDROOM 1.84 PASS 1.87 PASSR3/31 W4/31 BEDROOM 1.81 PASS 1.83 PASSR4/31 W2/31 BEDROOM 3.17 PASS 3.17 PASSSecond FloorR1/32 W1/32 BEDROOMR1/32 W2/32 BEDROOMR1/32 W3/32 BEDROOM 2.14 PASS 2.15 PASS

PLOT 19

Ground FloorR1/40 W4/40 KDR1/40 W5/40 KD 2.65 PASS 2.66 PASSR2/40 W2/40 LIVINGROOM 1.76 PASS 1.78 PASSR3/40 W3/40 STUDY 1.71 PASS 1.71 PASSFirst FloorR1/41 W3/41 BEDROOM 1.61 PASS 1.61 PASSR2/41 W4/41 BEDROOM 2.31 PASS 2.33 PASSR3/41 W2/41 BEDROOM 1.77 PASS 1.79 PASSR4/41 W1/41 BEDROOM 1.79 PASS 1.82 PASS

ADFINT_191212_Rel 2 Adjusted 19/12/2012 1Job No. 32481

Rel No. 2


Malcolm Hollis LLP


BranchFAIL

Second FloorR1/42 W1/42 BEDROOMR1/42 W2/42 BEDROOMR1/42 W3/42 BEDROOM 1.77 PASS 1.78 PASS

PLOT 20

Ground FloorR1/50 W2/50 KDR1/50 W3/50 KD 2.29 PASS 2.38 PASSR2/50 W1/50 LIVINGROOM 1.77 PASS 1.79 PASSFirst FloorR1/51 W4/51 BEDROOM 1.85 PASS 1.94 PASSR2/51 W2/51 BEDROOM 1.81 PASS 1.84 PASSR3/51 W1/51 BEDROOM 1.83 PASS 1.85 PASSR4/51 W3/51 BEDROOM 2.75 PASS 2.82 PASSSecond FloorR1/52 W1/52 BEDROOM PASS PASSR1/52 W2/52 BEDROOM PASS PASSR1/52 W3/52 BEDROOM 2.08 PASS 2.11 PASS

PLOT 21

Ground FloorR1/60 W2/60 KD PASS PASSR1/60 W3/60 KD 2.38 PASS 2.40 PASSR2/60 W1/60 LIVINGROOM 1.81 PASS 1.83 PASSFirst FloorR1/61 W3/61 BEDROOM 1.95 PASS 1.98 PASSR2/61 W2/61 BEDROOM 1.87 PASS 1.89 PASSR3/61 W1/61 BEDROOM 1.85 PASS 1.87 PASSR4/61 W4/61 BEDROOM 2.84 PASS 2.91 PASSSecond FloorR1/62 W1/62 BEDROOMR1/62 W2/62 BEDROOMR1/62 W3/62 BEDROOM 2.13 PASS 2.14 PASS

PLOT 22

Ground FloorR1/70 W3/70 KDR1/70 W4/70 KD 2.40 PASS 2.48 PASSR2/70 W2/70 LIVINGROOM 1.89 PASS 1.91 PASSR3/70 W1/70 STUDY 1.87 PASS 1.88 PASSFirst FloorR1/71 W3/71 BEDROOM 1.41 PASS 1.48 PASSR2/71 W4/71 BEDROOM 2.11 PASS 2.17 PASSR3/71 W1/71 BEDROOM 1.86 PASS 1.88 PASSR4/71 W2/71 BEDROOM 1.89 PASS 1.92 PASSSecond FloorR1/72 W1/72 BEDROOMR1/72 W2/72 BEDROOMR1/72 W3/72 BEDROOM 1.77 PASS 1.79 PASS

PLOT 23

Ground FloorR1/80 W4/80 KDR1/80 W5/80 KD 2.38 PASS 2.46 PASSR2/80 W1/80 LIVINGROOM 1.52 PASS 1.60 PASSR3/80 W2/80 STUDYR3/80 W3/80 STUDY 2.91 PASS 3.04 PASS


Rel No. 2


Malcolm Hollis LLP


BranchFAIL

First FloorR1/81 W4/81 BEDROOM 1.50 PASS 1.55 PASSR2/81 W5/81 BEDROOM 2.12 PASS 2.20 PASSR3/81 W2/81 BEDROOMR3/81 W3/81 BEDROOM 3.08 PASS 3.22 PASSR4/81 W1/81 BEDROOM 1.57 PASS 1.64 PASSSecond FloorR1/82 W1/82 BEDROOMR1/82 W2/82 BEDROOMR1/82 W3/82 BEDROOM 1.68 PASS 1.72 PASS

PLOT 13

Ground FloorR1/90 W1/90 KDR1/90 W5/90 KD 1.92 FAIL 2.18 PASSR2/90 W3/90 LIVINGROOM 1.59 PASS 1.65 PASSR3/90 W2/90 STUDYR3/90 W4/90 STUDY 2.98 PASS 3.11 PASSFirst Floor R1/91 W1/91 BEDROOM 1.29 PASS 1.45 PASSR2/91 W2/91 BEDROOM 1.83 PASS 2.06 PASSR3/91 W4/91 BEDROOMR3/91 W6/91 BEDROOM 3.18 PASS 3.31 PASSR4/91 W5/91 BEDROOM 1.63 PASS 1.70 PASSSecond FloorR1/92 W1/92 BEDROOMR1/92 W2/92 BEDROOMR1/92 W3/92 BEDROOM 1.68 PASS 1.73 PASS

PLOT 14

Ground FloorR1/100 W1/100 KDR1/100 W2/100 KD 1.84 FAIL 2.24 PASSR2/100 W4/100 LIVINGROOM 1.17 PASS 1.37 PASSR3/100 W3/100 STUDY 1.41 PASS 1.69 PASSFirst FloorR1/101 W2/101 BEDROOM 0.89 FAIL 1.24 PASSR2/101 W1/101 BEDROOM 1.64 PASS 1.97 PASSR3/101 W3/101 BEDROOM 1.40 PASS 1.63 PASSR4/101 W4/101 BEDROOM 1.33 PASS 1.59 PASSSecond FloorR1/102 W1/102 BEDROOMR1/102 W2/102 BEDROOMR1/102 W3/102 BEDROOM 1.48 PASS 1.63 PASS

PLOT 15

Ground FloorR1/110 W3/110 KDR1/110 W4/110 KD 2.17 PASS 2.36 PASSR2/110 W2/110 LIVINGROOM 1.28 FAIL 1.58 PASSR3/110 W1/110 STUDY 1.40 PASS 1.66 PASSFirst FloorR1/111 W4/111 BEDROOM 1.29 PASS 1.45 PASSR2/111 W3/111 BEDROOM 1.96 PASS 2.15 PASSR3/111 W1/111 BEDROOM 1.34 PASS 1.59 PASSR4/111 W2/111 BEDROOM 1.13 PASS 1.48 PASSSecond FloorR1/112 W1/112 BEDROOMR1/112 W2/112 BEDROOMR1/112 W3/112 BEDROOM 1.38 PASS 1.57 PASS


Rel No. 2


Malcolm Hollis LLP


BranchFAIL

APARTMENT BLOCKS B1 - B6

Ground FloorR1/120 W1/120 BEDROOM 1.86 PASS 1.92 PASSR2/120 W2/120 BEDROOM 1.32 PASS 1.37 PASSR3/120 W3/120 BEDROOM 1.26 PASS 1.34 PASSR4/120 W4/120 BEDROOM 1.70 PASS 1.85 PASSR5/120 W5/120 LKDR5/120 W6/120 LKDR5/120 W10/120 LKDR5/120 W11/120 LKD 1.92 FAIL 2.17 PASSR6/120 W7/120 LKDR6/120 W8/120 LKDR6/120 W9/120 LKD 1.42 FAIL 1.82 FAILFirst FloorR1/121 W1/121 BEDROOM 1.96 PASS 2.03 PASSR2/121 W2/121 BEDROOM 1.38 PASS 1.44 PASSR3/121 W3/121 BEDROOM 1.32 PASS 1.40 PASSR4/121 W4/121 BEDROOM 1.76 PASS 1.92 PASSR5/121 W5/121 BEDROOM 1.62 PASS 1.84 PASSR6/121 W6/121 BEDROOM 0.99 FAIL 1.19 PASSR7/121 W7/121 BEDROOM 0.97 FAIL 1.21 PASSR8/121 W8/121 BEDROOMR8/121 W23/121 BEDROOM 2.07 PASS 2.47 PASSR9/121 W17/121 LKDR9/121 W18/121 LKDR9/121 W20/121 LKDR9/121 W22/121 LKDR9/121 W24/121 LKDR9/121 W25/121 LKD 2.19 PASS 2.49 PASSR10/121 W11/121 LKDR10/121 W12/121 LKDR10/121 W13/121 LKD 1.10 FAIL 1.65 FAILR11/121 W14/121 LKDR11/121 W15/121 LKDR11/121 W16/121 LKD 1.40 FAIL 1.80 FAILR12/121 W9/121 LKDR12/121 W10/121 LKDR12/121 W19/121 LKDR12/121 W21/121 LKD 1.86 FAIL 2.16 PASSSecond FloorR1/122 W1/122 BEDROOM 2.06 PASS 2.13 PASSR2/122 W2/122 BEDROOM 1.45 PASS 1.50 PASSR3/122 W3/122 BEDROOM 1.38 PASS 1.46 PASSR4/122 W4/122 BEDROOM 1.84 PASS 2.01 PASSR5/122 W5/122 BEDROOM 1.67 PASS 1.91 PASSR6/122 W6/122 BEDROOM 1.04 PASS 1.27 PASSR7/122 W7/122 BEDROOM 0.93 FAIL 1.21 PASSR8/122 W8/122 BEDROOM PASS PASSR8/122 W23/122 BEDROOM 2.00 PASS 2.47 PASSR9/122 W17/122 LKDR9/122 W18/122 LKDR9/122 W20/122 LKDR9/122 W22/122 LKDR9/122 W24/122 LKDR9/122 W25/122 LKD 2.09 PASS 2.47 PASSR10/122 W14/122 LKDR10/122 W15/122 LKDR10/122 W16/122 LKD 1.55 FAIL 1.90 FAILR11/122 W11/122 LKDR11/122 W12/122 LKDR11/122 W13/122 LKD 1.07 FAIL 1.64 FAIL


Rel No. 2


Malcolm Hollis LLP


BranchFAIL

R12/122 W9/122 LKDR12/122 W10/122 LKDR12/122 W19/122 LKDR12/122 W21/122 LKD 1.93 FAIL 2.22 PASSThird FloorR1/123 W10/123 LKDR1/123 W11/123 LKD 1.50 PASS 1.58 PASSR2/123 W6/123 BEDROOM 0.92 FAIL 1.13 PASSR3/123 W5/123 BEDROOM 1.37 PASS 1.73 PASSR4/123 W3/123 BEDROOM 1.20 PASS 1.29 PASSR5/123 W4/123 BEDROOM 1.10 PASS 1.24 PASSR6/123 W1/123 BEDROOM 1.34 PASS 1.38 PASSR7/123 W2/123 BEDROOM 2.05 PASS 2.12 PASSR8/123 W9/123 LKDR8/123 W12/123 LKD 1.49 PASS 1.63 PASSR9/123 W8/123 LKDR9/123 W13/123 LKD 1.33 PASS 1.54 PASSR10/123 W7/123 LKDR10/123 W14/123 LKD 1.44 PASS 1.55 PASS

APARTMENT BLOCKS A1 - A6

Ground FloorR1/130 W4/130 LKDR1/130 W5/130 LKDR1/130 W7/130 LKDR1/130 W10/130 LKDR1/130 W11/130 LKD 1.39 FAIL 1.72 FAILR2/130 W1/130 LKDR2/130 W2/130 LKDR2/130 W6/130 LKDR2/130 W9/130 LKD 1.24 FAIL 1.76 FAILR3/130 W17/130 BEDROOM 1.72 PASS 1.78 PASSR4/130 W16/130 BEDROOM 1.54 PASS 1.59 PASSR5/130 W8/130 BEDROOM 0.94 FAIL 0.95 PASSR6/130 W14/130 LKDR6/130 W15/130 LKDR6/130 W18/130 LKD 1.34 FAIL 1.41 FAILR7/130 W13/130 BEDROOM 0.97 FAIL 1.11 PASSR8/130 W12/130 BEDROOM 0.98 FAIL 1.12 PASSR9/130 W3/130 BEDROOM 0.91 PASS 1.14 PASSFirst Floor R1/131 W4/131 LKDR1/131 W5/131 LKDR1/131 W7/131 LKDR1/131 W10/131 LKDR1/131 W11/131 LKD 2.12 PASS 2.55 PASSR2/131 W12/131 BEDROOM 0.98 FAIL 1.11 PASSR3/131 W13/131 BEDROOM 0.97 FAIL 1.11 PASSR4/131 W14/131 LKDR4/131 W15/131 LKDR4/131 W18/131 LKD 1.90 PASS 2.04 PASSR5/131 W8/131 BEDROOM 1.03 PASS 1.04 PASSR6/131 W3/131 BEDROOM 0.99 FAIL 1.20 PASSR7/131 W16/131 BEDROOM 1.68 PASS 1.73 PASSR8/131 W1/131 LKDR8/131 W2/131 LKDR8/131 W6/131 LKDR8/131 W9/131 LKD 1.29 FAIL 1.78 FAILR9/131 W17/131 BEDROOM 1.84 PASS 1.91 PASSSecond FloorR10/132 W1/132 LKDR10/132 W2/132 LKD


Rel No. 2


Malcolm Hollis LLP


BranchFAIL

R10/132 W6/132 LKDR10/132 W8/132 LKD 1.66 FAIL 2.06 PASSR11/132 W15/132 BEDROOM 1.96 PASS 2.04 PASSR12/132 W14/132 BEDROOM 1.84 PASS 1.90 PASSR13/132 W7/132 BEDROOM 1.09 PASS 1.10 PASSR14/132 W12/132 LKDR14/132 W13/132 LKDR14/132 W16/132 LKD 2.04 PASS 2.16 PASSR15/132 W11/132 BEDROOM 1.04 PASS 1.16 PASSR16/132 W10/132 BEDROOM 1.03 PASS 1.14 PASSR17/132 W4/132 LKDR17/132 W5/132 LKDR17/132 W9/132 LKD 2.10 PASS 2.35 PASSR18/132 W3/132 BEDROOM 1.14 PASS 1.30 PASSThird FloorR1/133 W1/133 LKDR1/133 W10/133 LKD 2.39 PASS 2.58 PASSR2/133 W7/133 BEDROOM 1.39 PASS 1.44 PASSR3/133 W6/133 BEDROOM 2.16 PASS 2.24 PASSR4/133 W13/133 BEDROOM 1.29 PASS 1.29 PASSR5/133 W5/133 LKDR5/133 W8/133 LKDR5/133 W11/133 LKD 3.21 PASS 3.32 PASSR6/133 W12/133 BEDROOM 2.06 PASS 2.10 PASSR7/133 W3/133 LKDR7/133 W4/133 LKD 1.39 PASS 1.50 PASSR8/133 W2/133 BEDROOMR8/133 W9/133 BEDROOM 3.90 PASS 4.03 PASS


Rel No. 2

Woodlands, Stalybridge DAYLIGHT DISTRIBUTION ANALYSISAnalysed December 2012

Malcolm Hollis LLP

Room/Floor Room Use Room Area % Of Room Area % Of Room Areasq ft Full Leaf Bare Branch

PLOT 16

Ground FloorR1/10 KD 238.0 95.9 96.2R2/10 LIVINGROOM 163.8 98.9 98.9R3/10 STUDY 83.9 97.3 97.7First Floor R1/11 BEDROOM 117.2 93.4 93.6R2/11 BEDROOM 75.0 97.2 97.4R3/11 BEDROOM 81.3 97.8 97.9R4/11 BEDROOM 143.1 95.7 95.7Second FloorR1/12 BEDROOM 244.7 100.0 100.0

PLOT 17

Ground FloorR1/20 KD 238.9 97.1 97.2R2/20 LIVINGROOM 163.6 98.8 98.8First FloorR1/21 BEDROOM 117.2 92.5 92.5R2/21 BEDROOM 143.1 94.1 94.1R3/21 BEDROOM 81.3 96.2 96.2R4/21 BEDROOM 74.8 95.3 95.3Second FloorR1/22 BEDROOM 243.6 100.0 100.0

PLOT 18


PLOT 19

Ground FloorR1/40 KD 238.0 96.7 96.7R2/40 LIVINGROOM 163.8 98.9 99.0R3/40 STUDY 83.9 98.3 98.3First FloorR1/41 BEDROOM 117.2 93.8 93.9R2/41 BEDROOM 75.0 97.3 97.3R3/41 BEDROOM 81.3 98.0 98.0R4/41 BEDROOM 143.1 95.7 95.7Second FloorR1/42 BEDROOM 244.7 100.0 100.0

PLOT 20


DDINT_191212_Rel2 Adjusted 19/12/2012 1Job No. 32481

Rel No. 2


Malcolm Hollis LLP


PLOT 21

Ground FloorR1/60 KD 238.9 96.6 96.7R2/60 LIVINGROOM 163.6 98.8 98.8First Floor R1/61 BEDROOM 117.2 92.5 92.5R2/61 BEDROOM 143.1 94.0 94.1R3/61 BEDROOM 81.3 96.1 96.1R4/61 BEDROOM 74.8 95.3 95.3Second FloorR1/62 BEDROOM 243.6 100.0 100.0

PLOT 22


PLOT 23

Ground FloorR1/80 KD 238.0 97.2 97.2R2/80 LIVINGROOM 163.8 98.5 98.5R3/80 STUDY 83.9 99.7 99.7First FlorR1/81 BEDROOM 117.2 94.1 94.1R2/81 BEDROOM 75.0 97.7 97.7R3/81 BEDROOM 81.3 99.8 99.8R4/81 BEDROOM 143.1 95.7 95.7Second FloorR1/82 BEDROOM 244.7 100.0 100.0

PLOT 13


PLOT 14

Ground FloorR1/100 KD 238.0 96.2 96.3R2/100 LIVINGROOM 163.8 76.8 84.7R3/100 STUDY 83.9 97.9 98.1First FloorR1/101 BEDROOM 117.2 92.7 93.3R2/101 BEDROOM 75.0 95.5 96.2R3/101 BEDROOM 81.3 97.5 97.8R4/101 BEDROOM 143.1 76.0 84.6


Rel No. 2


Malcolm Hollis LLP


Second FloorR1/102 BEDROOM 244.7 99.6 99.8

PLOT 15


APARTMENT BLOCKS B1 - B6 Ground FloorR1/120 BEDROOM 137.9 93.9 94.1R2/120 BEDROOM 77.7 98.5 98.5R3/120 BEDROOM 77.7 97.8 97.8R4/120 BEDROOM 137.9 94.3 94.4R5/120 LKD 257.7 96.8 97.5R6/120 LKD 269.6 97.3 97.7First FloorR1/121 BEDROOM 137.9 94.3 94.3R2/121 BEDROOM 77.7 98.6 98.6R3/121 BEDROOM 77.7 97.8 97.8R4/121 BEDROOM 137.9 94.3 94.4R5/121 BEDROOM 137.9 94.2 94.2R6/121 BEDROOM 77.7 96.3 96.3R7/121 BEDROOM 77.7 96.3 96.3R8/121 BEDROOM 137.9 99.3 99.3R9/121 LKD 295.0 99.6 99.7R10/121 LKD 269.6 92.1 94.8R11/121 LKD 269.6 97.9 98.1R12/121 LKD 257.7 95.7 96.9Second FloorR1/122 BEDROOM 137.9 94.3 94.3R2/122 BEDROOM 77.7 98.6 98.6R3/122 BEDROOM 77.7 97.8 97.8R4/122 BEDROOM 137.9 93.7 94.1R5/122 BEDROOM 137.9 94.2 94.2R6/122 BEDROOM 77.7 76.9 85.5R7/122 BEDROOM 77.7 92.9 94.4R8/122 BEDROOM 137.9 99.3 99.4R9/122 LKD 295.0 99.7 99.7R10/122 LKD 269.6 96.5 97.3R11/122 LKD 269.6 92.1 94.9R12/122 LKD 257.7 90.0 93.7Third FloorR1/123 LKD 257.7 89.4 90.2R2/123 BEDROOM 132.5 66.6 76.0R3/123 BEDROOM 63.6 58.3 73.8R4/123 BEDROOM 131.7 62.7 71.1R5/123 BEDROOM 131.7 71.8 76.8R6/123 BEDROOM 131.7 83.8 83.9R7/123 BEDROOM 63.7 93.9 93.9R8/123 LKD 218.0 84.9 88.4R9/123 LKD 218.0 83.7 87.4R10/123 LKD 257.7 79.7 84.7


Rel No. 2


Malcolm Hollis LLP


APARTMENT BLOCKS A1 - A6 Ground FloorR1/130 LKD 283.4 98.0 98.3R2/130 LKD 257.7 90.3 93.7R3/130 BEDROOM 141.1 89.7 90.2R4/130 BEDROOM 77.7 97.2 97.6R5/130 BEDROOM 136.9 81.6 82.4R6/130 LKD 253.7 96.0 96.2R7/130 BEDROOM 74.3 84.5 88.5R8/130 BEDROOM 74.3 90.8 92.2R9/130 BEDROOM 136.9 91.0 92.0First FloorR1/131 LKD 283.4 91.5 95.1R2/131 BEDROOM 74.3 88.8 91.0R3/131 BEDROOM 74.3 80.2 86.1R4/131 LKD 253.3 96.7 97.0R5/131 BEDROOM 136.9 86.3 86.7R6/131 BEDROOM 136.9 65.5 77.7R7/131 BEDROOM 77.7 98.6 98.6R8/131 LKD 257.7 82.4 89.3R9/131 BEDROOM 141.1 93.0 93.1Second FloorR10/132 LKD 257.7 87.1 92.0R11/132 BEDROOM 141.1 93.8 93.8R12/132 BEDROOM 77.7 98.8 98.8R13/132 BEDROOM 136.9 90.0 90.5R14/132 LKD 253.3 99.4 99.5R15/132 BEDROOM 74.3 83.6 88.9R16/132 BEDROOM 74.3 92.3 94.0R17/132 LKD 283.4 94.1 96.4R18/132 BEDROOM 136.9 74.6 83.7Third FloorR1/133 LKD 257.0 70.7 78.5R2/133 BEDROOM 112.3 84.5 84.8R3/133 BEDROOM 53.1 92.5 92.5R4/133 BEDROOM 136.2 71.1 71.1R5/133 LKD 277.4 98.2 98.2R6/133 BEDROOM 61.2 100.0 100.0R7/133 LKD 239.0 92.7 95.5R8/133 BEDROOM 136.2 84.4 84.5


Rel No. 2

Appendix E

Sunlight Study

Woodlands, Stalybridge APSH ANALYSISAnalysed December 2012

Malcolm Hollis LLP

Room Winter Annual Pass/Room Window Use APSH APSH Fail

PLOT 16 Ground FloorR2/10 W1/10 LIVINGROOM 12 45 PASS

PLOT 17 Ground Floor R2/20 W1/20 LIVINGROOM 15 50 PASS



PLOT 20Ground FloorR2/50 W1/50 LIVINGROOM 0 0 FAIL

PLOT 21Ground Floor R2/60 W1/60 LIVINGROOM 0 3 FAIL



PLOT 13Ground FloorR2/90 W3/90 LIVINGROOM 18 57 PASS

PLOT 14Ground FloorR2/100 W4/100 LIVINGROOM 13 50 PASS

PLOT 15Ground Floor R2/110 W2/110 LIVINGROOM 32 65 PASS

Job No. 32481Rel No. 2


Malcolm Hollis LLP


APARTMENT BLOCKS B1 - B6Ground FloorR5/120 W5/120 LKDR5/120 W6/120 LKDR5/120 W10/120 LKDR5/120 W11/120 LKD 22 59 PASSR6/120 W7/120 LKDR6/120 W8/120 LKDR6/120 W9/120 LKD 13 41 PASS

First FloorR9/121 W17/121 LKDR9/121 W18/121 LKDR9/121 W20/121 LKDR9/121 W22/121 LKDR9/121 W24/121 LKDR9/121 W25/121 LKD 31 94 PASSR10/121 W11/121 LKDR10/121 W12/121 LKDR10/121 W13/121 LKD 14 41 PASSR11/121 W14/121 LKDR11/121 W15/121 LKDR11/121 W16/121 LKD 11 40 PASSR12/121 W9/121 LKDR12/121 W10/121 LKDR12/121 W19/121 LKDR12/121 W21/121 LKD 25 63 PASS

Second FloorR9/122 W17/122 LKDR9/122 W18/122 LKDR9/122 W20/122 LKDR9/122 W22/122 LKDR9/122 W24/122 LKDR9/122 W25/122 LKD 39 99 PASSR10/122 W14/122 LKDR10/122 W15/122 LKDR10/122 W16/122 LKD 10 40 PASSR11/122 W11/122 LKDR11/122 W12/122 LKDR11/122 W13/122 LKD 13 41 PASSR12/122 W9/122 LKDR12/122 W10/122 LKDR12/122 W19/122 LKDR12/122 W21/122 LKD 25 67 PASS



Malcolm Hollis LLP


Third FloorR1/123 W10/123 LKDR1/123 W11/123 LKD 14 49 PASSR8/123 W9/123 LKDR8/123 W12/123 LKD 10 47 PASSR9/123 W8/123 LKDR9/123 W13/123 LKD 13 48 PASSR10/123 W7/123 LKDR10/123 W14/123 LKD 15 49 PASS

APARTMENT BLOCKS A1 - A6 Ground FloorR1/130 W4/130 LKDR1/130 W5/130 LKDR1/130 W7/130 LKDR1/130 W10/130 LKDR1/130 W11/130 LKD 2 23 FAILR2/130 W1/130 LKDR2/130 W2/130 LKDR2/130 W6/130 LKDR2/130 W9/130 LKD 0 13 FAILR6/130 W14/130 LKDR6/130 W15/130 LKDR6/130 W18/130 LKD 15 63 PASS

First FloorR1/131 W4/131 LKDR1/131 W5/131 LKDR1/131 W7/131 LKDR1/131 W10/131 LKDR1/131 W11/131 LKD 12 41 PASSR4/131 W14/131 LKDR4/131 W15/131 LKDR4/131 W18/131 LKD 15 70 PASSR8/131 W1/131 LKDR8/131 W2/131 LKDR8/131 W6/131 LKDR8/131 W9/131 LKD 0 18 FAIL

Second FloorR10/132 W1/132 LKDR10/132 W2/132 LKDR10/132 W6/132 LKDR10/132 W8/132 LKD 0 25 FAILR14/132 W12/132 LKDR14/132 W13/132 LKDR14/132 W16/132 LKD 18 76 PASS



Malcolm Hollis LLP


R17/132 W4/132 LKDR17/132 W5/132 LKDR17/132 W9/132 LKD 12 39 PASS

Third FloorR1/133 W1/133 LKDR1/133 W10/133 LKD 0 7 FAILR5/133 W5/133 LKDR5/133 W8/133 LKDR5/133 W11/133 LKD 28 86 PASSR7/133 W3/133 LKDR7/133 W4/133 LKD 11 38 PASS


19dec12 daylight & sunlight report -...

Documents