1994 issue 8 - reformed prose, dead men and disobedience - counsel of chalcedon
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/12/2019 1994 Issue 8 - Reformed Prose, Dead Men and Disobedience - Counsel of Chalcedon
1/2
9Ls
lJeaa
Men
6y
Ina Painter
((but
my peopfe have
changea
tlieir
gfory for that
wfiicfi
aotfi not profit.
Jer.
2:11
October / November
994
THE COUNSEL of
Chalcedon
; 23
-
8/12/2019 1994 Issue 8 - Reformed Prose, Dead Men and Disobedience - Counsel of Chalcedon
2/2
t])iso6etfience
6y
InaPainter
$readof
cfeceit
is sweet to
a
manj out afterwardS nis
11WUtn
sna{{
oe
forecf
witli
graver. JJ
Proverbs
20:17
'lJisooeaience
mask itself
as oeing re(ative{y unimportant,
a rationa[izeapause,
going
unnoticecC,
promising no fasting iffect.
lfaving
oegun to
waiver
in
tlie
narrow patfiway
we cease to ponaer
~ - - w f i a n J t u ; n I T a s - 6 r c r a c F w : i c F - ~
now
tfie cfioue
maae
'I1ie p{easurea
sin
_oot
{oo (g.cC,
at first to
oe no
fiarm,
lias
pusfiea
it
wi({ju{
way
ana
we
are
victims
afreaay,
fiaving faen prey
to sin's
controc.
( But
every
man is temptei
when he is arawn away o
his
own rust, anaenticed.
'Then
when
rust
hath
con-
ceivei it Gnngeth forth
sin:
anasin, when
it is
finishei Gnngeth forth
aeath.
JJ
James
1:
14-15
Coneeneue. cont. from pg 18
that for some
in
the PCA, the issue
isnotwhat the Scripturessay, what
the Larger Catechism
says,
but that
this is simply a hindrance to
effective evangelism, and "our
times deIilllnd" (another dangerous
phrase from
the Consensus
Statement) that we not be so strict
in
our doctrine. Their ultimate
practice is governed, not by
Scripture,
not by
the Reformed
Faith, not by
concern
for or
confidence
in
doing God's work
God's way, not by confidence
in
the sovereignty of God who is
saving His elect through the
preaching of the tru th, but by the
anti Reformed "Arminian"
approach and atmosphere that says
we
must
use whatever means
32 THE COUNSEL
of
Chalcedon October November, 1994
Non-Profit
Org.
U.S. Postage
P ID
BULK RATE
Permit
No.
1553
Greenville, SC
29602
possible
to
get
as
many saved as we
can and we shouldn't let theology
get in our
way
I am concerned that some of
the views of
the
"Consensus
Statement" not only depart from
the Reformed tradition but that it
really
fails to
deal with the realroot
problem and to gloss over, to
insulate, latent, real, and practical
Arminianism in the
PCA
in the
name of "allowable diversity."
The PCA has an identity.
t
is
stated in her Constitution. The
crisis is not because she has no
identity but because she has
departed from her identity. This is
what is
so
egregious
to
those in the
PCA
who are still committed
to
her
original
position and
declarations.
Q