1989 issue 6 - exposing the hoax of a limited constitutional convention - counsel of chalcedon
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/12/2019 1989 Issue 6 - Exposing the Hoax of a Limited Constitutional Convention - Counsel of Chalcedon
1/3
1'HE
-
8/12/2019 1989 Issue 6 - Exposing the Hoax of a Limited Constitutional Convention - Counsel of Chalcedon
2/3
Constitution. The ONLY way, how
ever, to get to the entire document to
scrap and rewrite it is through the
SECOND method for change, avoided
for 200 years because of its
risks--
an
open CONSTITUTIONAL CONVEN-
. TION, (which explains the format for
the
Jefferson Foundation meetings).
Dangerous Historic
and
Legal
Precedent
The only historic precedent for a Con
stitutional Convention occurred in
1787. The (55) attending delegates did
several critical things:
a. They IGNORED their pre-set,
limited
agenda;
b.
hey TRASHED the entire exist
ing
government;
c. They WROTE a brand-NEW CON
STITUfiON, and most important,
d. (To assure adoption
of their new
Constitution), they IGNORED EXIST
ING
ratification requirements, wrote
NEW
ones, and
used
those
new
rules to
BYPASS the state legislatures.
Unquestionably, America has been
mightily blessed
by
the God-inspired
result, but as James Madison ("father"
of the Constitution) commented: Hav-
ing witnessed the difficUlties
and
dan-
gers experienced
y
the
FIRST
Con-
vention ... I would tremble for the re-
sult o the SECOND.
A SECOND Constitutional Conven
tion has not been held
in
200 years be
cause, by virtue
of
the only historic
pre-
cedent,
nothing
can
stop a SECOND
Convention from doing everything the
FIRST did. The enactment
of
legisla
tion, the ruling
of
the Courts, the pres
sure
of
the states, an uprising
of
the
people, CANNOT GUARANTEE that,
when the gavel falls, the second Con
vention will not
do
precisely what the
first did, which was
to
ignore tbem
all and
do
exactly what
it
pleased.
Those individuals and organizations
be-
hind the pro-Convention movement un
derstand this profound legal precedent
very clearly. Sadly, and
by
design, the
vast majority of Americans do not The
American people
are
being deliberately
led
like sheep
to
slaughter into a fatal
game
of
Russian Roulette with their
freedom and
Bill of
Rights, and for
what?
Balanced
Budget
Amendment Ruse
The stated goal
of
a Constitutional
Convention is to gain control
of
the
federal deficit
by
proposing a Balanced
Budget
Amendment to the Constitu
tion. Exploiting the legitimate and deep
concern of patriotic Americans every
where about
the
mushrooming federal
debt, the National Taxpayers Union
(NTU), members
of
the Conunittee
on
al
crisis.
Did
you know
we
were that
close to a Constitutional Convention,
an
event
that
could
destabilize
the
na
tion in
the
eyes
of
the world?
Did
you
read about it in the
Washington
Post
or
The
New
York
Times,
or
see
or
hear reports on NBC, CBS,
ABC? The silence of our "free press"
was deafening Only a cross-section
of
groups
and
organization, like the
American
Legion, the
VFW
churches
and
denominations (including
~ 0 1 1 1 1 ' 7 - , . - - ' , _ o o - , . , . _ . , ~ ~ - of Mir..tS..u. t.r...-.J.
the Constitutional System (CCS), and
others, with the help of a "gagged"
media,
have over
the past (15) years
quietly lobbied state legislators
to call
for
a Constitutional Convention, ostens
ibly
to
add
a
Balanced Budget Amend
ment to
the Constitution.
hen
(34)
state legislatures call for a Convention,
under Article V provisions
of
the Con
stitution,
a
Convention
SHALL be
held
It
's mandatory
By
January 1988, (32)
of the
required
(34) states had petitioned Congress for a
Convention, and America was teetering
on the brink of a full-scale Constitution-
the
Southern
Baptist Conven
tion), the AFL/CIO, the
John
Birch
Society, informed Farm
Bureaus, Eagle
Forum
and a few
others, had discovered the truth about
the risks
of
a Convention, had taken
positions opposing one,
and
had
started
to
spread the word.
Grass
Roots Effort to
Save
the
Constitution
Finally, as a result
of
state-wide
edu
cation
and
petition drives, starting and
growing
in
hundreds
of
churches and
veterans posts in
FLORIDA
and
ALA-
The Counsel
of
Chalcedon July 1989 p ge 9
-
8/12/2019 1989 Issue 6 - Exposing the Hoax of a Limited Constitutional Convention - Counsel of Chalcedon
3/3
~ M in 1988, a ~ i v e grass roots
coalition of people--Conservatives,
Liberals, Republicans, Democrats, Inde
pendents, etc.,--joined together
and
de
manded that their state legislators pro
t( ct
the Constitution and their freedoms
by withdrawing their state calls for a
Constitutional Convention. Those two
withdrawals, thanks to aroused .public
awareness of the risks, were overwhelm
ingly successful, but since then, the pro
Convention o r c ~ s have, as .James Dale
Davidson, Executive Director
of
the Na
tional Taxpayers Union (NTU), pilt it,
"taken the gloves off to stop efforts to
save the Constitution. Other attempts
to withdraw calls in 1988 met defeat in
Oklahoma, New Hampshire,
Louisiana, Maryland, Georgia,
and other states,
thanks
to Washington
based "big shots" and "big money."
Virginia's battle to withdraw lost
by
a
tie. vote in committee early in
1989,
despite a strong coalition
of
grass roots
support tmoughout the state.
America
is within a "hair's breadth"
of
calling its second Constitutional
Convention in history. Hundreds
of
millions of dollars are being pumped
into states like Michigan, New
Jersey, Vermont, Mootana,
Massachusetts, West Virginia,
California, and others, all across the
nation to railroad calls FOR . Conven
tion through state legislatures and to
ANNOUNCEMENT
The Counsel ofChalcedon
now
available on
microfiche
Mr.
Robert Jones of Portland, Oregon
has produced back issues
of
anumber
of Reformed publications on .
microftlm, including the .120+ issues
of The Counsel ofChalcedon.
These issues on microfiche are
available for sale
to
libraries or
anyone interested in having them.
At present Mr. Jones is asking
$100.00 for all current back issues
of The Counsel.
Robert Jones/TREN
P.O. Box 30183
Portland, OR 97230
STOP withdrawals of C o n v ~ n t i o n calls
in other states. Oregon, South
Carolina,
MissisSippi, etc.,
ate
all
trying to withdraw against enormous
pressure and lobbying from w e a l ~ y
special interest. The object
is
to get the
required
(34)
state calls
this year
forcing a Convention on the people
before th,ey are fully awakened to its
risks. '
The SAFE Solution
to the Deficit
Anyone who truly believes all this is
about a balanced budget
has
a difficult
time facing reality. The solution to' the
budget deficit
is very simple,
as
ex
pressed in the November 1985 issue of
the Oakland [Michigan] Business
Monthly: If this issue is so impor
tant that some would consider a Con
stitutional Convention--potentially . en
dangering that document, no . matter
how remote that danger s ~ t h e n perhaps
it
ought to become the sole issue of
Congressional elections .
We
figure
it
would be much better
to
dump out a
few Congressional seats and rewrite the
legislative roster
to
get the Balanc
e
Budget Amendment than to dump o
ut
a
few Constitutional provisions or re-
write a few fundalnental tenets of o
ur
nation.
The .
best solution is usually the
CORRECTION
In our June, 1989 issue, in the arti-
cle "From 6BP to lOKh we mis
takenly stated that the winner of the
Heart Trek lOk in Atlanta had run
the 6.2 mile course in under 20
minutes. That should have been in
.Uilder 30 minutes.
In the guide for helping calculate
fat percentage in a given food (2nd
colUmn,
Page 9) the instructions
should have read, "Each gram
of
fat
contains 9 calories. Therefore, in
our example, each serving contains
48% fat
a
grams times 9 calories
per gram : 72 calories of
fat,
.."
he
Counsel of Chalcedon July, 1989 page 10
. simplest So, why hasn't this one bee
tried? Why haven't the special interest
spet1t
. their millions
of
dollars o
making a public campaign issue out o
the Balanced u d g e ~ Amendment? Wh
haven't they
tw:geted
the districts o
those FEW members of Congress wh
voted against the m e n d m ~ t when i
last came before Congress? Surely, i
wouldn't take much "prodding" by th
voting public to convince a few mor
Congressional representatives to sup
port the Amendment.so that it could ge
through Congress Then, once passed
it. ,would
go
to the states for almos
certain ratificatiort. It is tota11y irre
sponsible
to
risk losing the Con
'stitution and every American's freedom
to get control of federal spending, whe
that objective can (and sltould) b
accomplished the SAME, SAFE wa
an
other changes to the Constitutio
have been a t t a i r i ~ t h r o u g h the C o n
gressional Amendment" process.
Ws Up to YOU to Save
Your Constitution
To SAVE THE CONSTITUTION
YOU must fight aConvention,
edu
ca
others, and convince your state legis
lators to
VOTE
AGAINSt a Constitu
tional Convention. The Constitutio
belo
rlgs
to the PEOPlE; if it is to b
saved, it .will be saved by WE IH
PEOPLE
(w
ith God's help, who in
spired its writing)*. An educationa
videotape, "The Constitution i
Crisis," is available for $6.00
pl\l
$2.00 postage. Order the tape, show
to
you
t frie
nd
s, fiunily,
n e i g h b o r
church, . clubs , etc., arid then
maybe .wi
th
a lot
of
prayer, we ma
have a chanc
e.
There is very little tim
left, so without your m n ~
there's virtually no hope. Write toda
for the video, .sample petition an
resOurc
e dQcumentation
to: Joan an
Bert Collins, 5737 Corporat
Way, .West Palm Beach, FL
~ 4 0 7 '
(407) 689-8222.
The TARGET of a Constitution
Convention is the CONSTITU'l'ION
NOT the DEFICIT
*[E(Iitor's note- While we believe Go
was providentially and involved i
the production of the U.S. Cons
titl,l
tio
obviously we at Chalcedon do not believe
was "inspired" in any sen
se
similar to th
wayj
n which Sc
rip
ture was inspired by
Go