1973-75 by d. j. mckenzie open-file report 76-6265.--graph showing chemical oxygen demand for...

56
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY INJECTION OF ACIDIC INDUSTRIAL WASTE INTO THE FLORIDAN AQUIFER NEAR BELLE GLADE, FLORIDA: UPWARD MIGRATION AND GEOCHEMICAL INTERACTIONS 1973-75 By D. J. McKenzie Open-File Report 76-626 Tallahassee, Florida September 1976

Upload: others

Post on 08-Apr-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

UNITED STATESDEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

INJECTION OF ACIDIC INDUSTRIAL WASTE INTO THE

FLORIDAN AQUIFER NEAR BELLE GLADE, FLORIDA:

UPWARD MIGRATION AND GEOCHEMICAL INTERACTIONS

1973-75

By D. J. McKenzie

Open-File Report 76-626

Tallahassee, Florida

September 1976

CONTENTS page

Abstract .............................. 1Introduction ............................ 2Regional geohydrology ......................... 5Description of injection system. .................. 7

Construction of wells ..................... 7Plant operated monitoring system. ............... 9

Operating history. .......................... 101966 - 72 .....'....................... 101973 - 75 ........................... 12

Results ... ........................... 14Chemistry of waste. .............'......... 14Chemistry of native fluids and composition of aquifer rock. . . 14Geochemical effects ...................... 29

Deep monitor well. .................... 29Shallow monitor well ................... 37

Changes in sulfate/chloride ratios. ......... 45Observations, 1969-73 ................ 46Observations, 1973-75 ................ 48Chemical oxygen demand data and waste migration ... 49

Summary and discussion. ....... ............... 51Selected references. .... ..... .............. 53

ILLUSTRATIONS

Figure l.--Map of Belle Glade area and potentiometric surface ofFloridan aquifer in south Florida. ........... 3

2.--Generalized geohydrologic section of the Belle Gladeinjection site and industrial waste injection and monitor- system after deepening the injection well, January 1972. 6

3.--Graph showing volume of waste injected, December 1966-March 1975 ....................... 13

4.--Graph showing sulfate reduction in shallow monitor wellfluid, 1966-75 ..................... 47

5.--Graph showing chemical oxygen demand for shallowmonitor well fluid ................... 50

TABLES

Table 1.--Chronology of waste injection showing duration of in­ jection, depth interval of waste emplacement and well used for injection. ................ 11

2.--Chemical analyses of industrial waste. .......... 153.--Chemical analyses of water from well at University of

Florida Experiment Station ............... 224.--Chemical analyses of water from deep monitor well. .... 305.--Chemical analyses of water from shallow monitor well ... 38

INJECTION OF ACIDIC INDUSTRIAL WASTE INTO THE FLORIDAN

AQUIFER NEAR BELLE GLADE, FLORIDA: UPWARD MIGRATION

AND GEOCHEMICAL INTERACTIONS, 1973-75.

By

Donald J. McKenzie

ABSTRACT

In 1966, a furfural plant at Belle Glade, Florida, began injecting hot, acidic liquid waste into the saline, water-filled lower part of the Floridan aq­ uifer, between the depths of 1,495-1,939 feet. The beds above and below the injection zone were subjected to at­ tack by the acid waste. By 1969, effects of the waste were detected in the water of the well monitoring the upper part of the Floridan aquifer at 1,400 feet. The disposal well was deepened late in 1971 to 2,242 feet in an attempt to stop the upward migration of waste.

The results of research investigations by the U.S. Geological Survey during 1966-73 indicated that the waste continued to move upward and laterally. This was indicated by observations of water-quality changes in the monitor wells. Subtle decreases in the sulfate/ chloride ratios, concomitant with increases in the hy­ drogen sulfide concentrations, were reported to be sen­ sitive indicators of waste migration.

\i*This investigation, continued by the U.S. Geologi­

cal Survey in 1973-75, shows that the remedial actions of repairing the disposal well liner and injecting per­ iodically into the deep monitor well at 2,060 feet failed to contain the wastes within the lower part of the Floridan aquifer. This investigation tends to con­ firm the earlier conclusions. The data collected by the Survey are supported by the owner's chemical-oxygen- demand and pH determinations. A hydraulic connection between the injection zone and the overlying monitoring zone is implied. Plans call for injecting into deeper strata.

INTRODUCTION

The U.S. Geological Survey is engaged in a nationwide research

program to evaluate the effects of underground waste disposal on the sub­

surface environment. Part of that investigation has been the collection

of hydraulic and geochemical data at an industrial deep-well injection

system near Belle Glade, Florida (fig. 1). Injection of hot, acidic,

liquid waste into the lower part of the Floridan aquifer at the Belle

Glade site began in 1966. By 1975, more than 1.5 billion gallons

(5.68 x lO^m^) Of waste had been injected.

Objectives of the Survey's investigation in Belle Glade are to under­

stand subsurface interactions of injected liquid wastes with the native

fluids and aquifer rock and to determine the ultimate fate of waste

injected in a saline and highly permeable carbonate rock aquifer.

The waste, natural Floridan aquifer water, and fluids from the in­

jection zone and upper Floridan aquifer were sampled periodically for

comprehensive chemical analyses. Correlations of specific chemical char­

acteristics were made between the waste and the fluids in the shallow and

deep monitor wells.

Results of this investigation have been reported by Kaufman, Goolsby,

and Faulkner (1973), and by Kaufman and McKenzie (1975). The purpose of

this report is to present all the data collected through 1975, and to

evaluate that data not covered by the earlier two reports. This report

updates and emphasizes the developments that have occurred since 1973.

Wes

t Pa

lm B

each

'1.'>

'""

""

jM

ll'C

>

""N

; "

L *

-;.f.

V,r

- T'i

i^C

' TsT

T T

AR

EA

O

r A

RT

CS

IAN

F

LO

W,

i;/A

V Mi

ami

Jir

Boc

a R

aton

0 10

20

30

40

$0

MIL

ES

i__

i

1.--Belle

Glade

area

and p

oten

tiom

etri

c-su

rfac

e of Fl

orid

an a

quifer in s

outh

Flo

rida

. (After Hea

ly,

1962 and

Kaufman, 1973).

'

For use of those readers who may prefer to use metric units rather

than English units, the conversion factors for the terms used in this

report are listed below:

Multiply English unit

inches (in)

feet (ft)

miles (mi)

gallons (gal)

million gallons (Mgal)

gallons per minute (gal/min)

million gallons per day(Mgal/d)

By

2.54

.3048

1.609

3.785x10-3

3785

6.309x10-5

.04381

To obtain SI units

centimeters (cm)

meters (m)

kilometers (km)

cubic meters (m^)

cubic meters (m3)

cubic meters per second (m3/s)

cubic meters per second (m3/s)

REGIONAL GEOHYDROLOGY

The shallow aquifer in the vicinity of Belle Glade, in the north

central part of Palm Beach County, extends from land surface to about

150 ft (46 m). In the southeast corner of the county it reaches a

depth of over 400 ft (122 m) #nd forms the north terminus of the

Biscayne aquifer which serves Broward and Dade Counties. The shallow

aquifer is underlain by several hundred feet of dense marl and carbonate

strata which overlie the Floridan aquifer.

The Floridan aquifer is mostly limestone and dolomite of middle

Eocene to middle Miocene age (Parker and others, 1955, p. 188-189). The

data obtained from test wells in southern Florida suggest that the

Floridan aquifer is composed of several artesian zones within the forma­

tions that make up the overall system (Meyer, 1971, p. 69).

Figure 2 shows the general sequence of permeable and confining beds

at the injection site, as well as a schematic of the injection system

and monitoring wells. In this report, the Floridan aquifer has been

divided into an "upper" and a "lower" part. The upper part lies above a

stratum, about 150 ft (46 m) thick, reportedly of dense carbonate rock,

that serves as the confining layer over the injection zone. The lower

part lies below this confining layer. Fluid waste is injected into the

lower part of the Floridan aquifer, within the approximate depth range

of 1,500 to 2,250 ft (460 to 690 m) below land surface. In both the upper

and lower parts of the Floridan at this location, ground water is brack­

ish or saline.

At Belle Glade, land surface is about 15 ft above mean sea level.

The altitude of the potentiometric surface in both the lower and upper

5

w

CO

IH W W

a

BELLE GLADE INJECTION SITE

200C <.

2500

3000.

Shallow aquifer

Confining Beds -dense marl

s/ //''/// /' X / y' / x /

Dense carbonate rocks

Upper part of the Floridan aquiferpermeable carbonate rocks

1000 mg/1

Dense carbonate rocks 7 /

1650 mg/1.Lower part of the

Floridan aquifer permeable carbonate rocks

7000 mg/1

Highly permeable carbonate rocks

mg/1 /-

-dense carbonate rocks

INJECTION SHALLOW DEEP WELL MONITOR - MONITOR

I u_____1000 FTl J__^U^TIT^LJ i^^tnpf wTw i r-r^' n

i i

LJ

-50o

-kso

-700

w

.300

-^00 gMwPQ

2

w

Figure 2.--Generalized geohydrological section at Belle Glade showing the industrial waste injection and monitoring s'ystem as of January 1972, after deepening the injection well.(Partial data sources include Garcia-Bengochea and Vernon, 1970; Kaufman, 1973).

parts of the Floridan aquifer is about 57 ft (Healy, 1962). The slope

of the potentioraetric surface indicates that regional ground-water flow

in the Floridan aquifer is southeastward toward the Atlantic Ocean.

DESCRIPTION OF INJECTION SYSTEM

Construction of Wells

The injection system consists of one disposal well, one shallow

monitor well, and one deep monitor well that is also used as a standby

disposal well. The waste from the furfural plant is injected into the

lower part of the Floridan aquifer (fig. 2).

The disposal well was originally drilled to a depth of 1,939 ft

(591 m) and cased with 12-inch (30-cm) diameter pipe to 1,494 ft

(456 m). Injection was through an 8 inch (20-cm) diameter stainless

steel liner that was run to the bottom of the casing and set with a

packer. The well was open from 1,495 to 1,939 ft (456 - 591 m) in the

lower part of the Floridan aquifer.

The deep monitor well (fig. 2) is 1,000 ft (305 m) southeast of

the disposal well in the downgradient direction of ground-water flow.

Because the well is used to assess hydraulic and geochemical effects

of waste disposal within the injection zone, the well was made similar

in depth and construction to the disposal well. It has a total depth

of 2,060 ft (628 m) and a 12-inch (30-cm) steel casing to 1,495 ft

(456 m). This well also has an 8-inch (20-cm) stainless steel liner

from the surface to the bottom of the casing. This permits the well to

be used for waste injection when the disposal well is shut down.

The shallow monitor well (fig. 2) is 75 ft (23 m) south of the

injection well. It monitors hydraulic and geochemical effects within

the upper part of the Floridan aquifer. The well is cased to a depth

of 648 ft (198 m) and completed open-hole through the upper part of

the Floridan aquifer to a depth of 1,400 ft (427 m). The well bottom

is about 50 feet (15 m) into the 150-foot (46-m) thick zone of

reportedly dense carbonate rock that serves as the confining layer over

the injection zone.

A well which taps the upper part of the Floridan aquifer at the

University of Florida Everglades Experiment Station, 3 mi (5 km)

southeast of the Belle Glade site, was used to represent the chemical

character of the upper part of the Floridan aquifer. This well is

cased to 957 ft (292 m) and completed open hole to 1,332 ft (406 m).

Plant Operated Monitoring System

Continuous monitoring of the system was planned to detect changes

in the quality of water in the upper and lower parts of the aquifer. The

shallow monitor well was allowed to backflow continuously at 2-3 gal/min

(0.01-0.02 m3/s) to facilitate the recovery of representative samples

from the upper part of the Floridan aquifer. The annulus between the

liner and 12-inch (30-cm) casing in the disposal and deep-monitor wells

contains water that is circulated constantly under pressure. Any appre­

ciable change in pressure in the closed circuit would indicate a leak in

the casing-liner system. In addition, since injection began; a daily

record of the following as information has been kept by the plant

operators.

Volume of injected waste

Average injection pressure

In late 1969, the plant operators began additional monitoring, as

follows:

Shallow monitoring well and deep monitoring well

Chemical oxygen demand and pH: Weekly

Biochemical oxygen demand: Biweekly

Specific conductance: Continuously

Disposal well and waste

Injection rate, pressure and temperature: Continuously

Suspended solids, biochemical oxygen demand: Biweekly

Chemical oxygen demand, pH: Weekly

OPERATING HISTORY

1966 - 72

Beginning in December 1966, waste was injected in the lower part

of the Floridan aquifer, between the depths of 1,495 ft (456 m) and

1,939 ft (591 m). Injection was seasonal; production operations were

usually suspended 2-3 months in late summer.

In the fall of 1969, company staff detected an increase in COD

(chemical-oxygen-demand) and BOD (biological-oxygen-demand) and a de­

crease in pH (hydrogen ion activity) in water from the shallow monitor

well. These were indications that waste was migrating upward from the

injection zone. In an attempt to seal off the upper Floridan aquifer,

the disposal well was deepened to 2,242 ft (683 m) and the liner

extended to 1,939 ft (591 m) and grouted (fig. 2). The casing was not

extended, but remained at 1,495 ft.

While the disposal well was being deepened, from October 1971

through January 1972, the deep monitor well was used for waste disposal

(Table 1). More than 75 Mgal (2.84 x 10^ m-*) of waste were injected

during this 4-month span. Since the disposal well was returned to

service, the deep monitor well has been allowed to backflow conti­

nuously at 2-3 gal/min (.01-0.2 m^s). The backflow was sampled period­

ically for information about the ultimate fate of waste in the aquifer.

In October 1972, about 9 months after waste injection had been

resumed in the deepened disposal well, a mechanical caliper log in­

dicated that the well was open to the aquifer from 1,923 - 1,945 ft

(586 - 593 m) and apparently bridged or plugged below 1,945 ft (593 m).

10

Table 1 .--Chronology" of waste injection, showing duration of injection, depth interval of waste emplacement and well used for injection.

TIME: WASTE INJECTION ZONE:

December 17, 1966

OcioberS, 1971 J

Disposal Well

(1500- 1900ft.) (457 - 579 m)

October 9, 1971 ""

January 12, 1972^

Deep Monitor Well

(1495-2060 ft.) (456 - 628 m)

Januory 13, 1972

June 17, 1973 J

Disposal Well (1938 -2242 ft.) (591 - 683 m)

June 18, 1973

June 1974 ,

July 1974

PresentApril 1975 J

Deep Monitor Well(1495-2060 ft.)(456 - 628 m)

Disposal Well (1938 -2242 ft.) (591 - 683 m)

11

It was discovered that about 15 ft (4.6 m) of the mild-steel bottom

section of the liner had been destroyed by corrosion.

Since November 1972, plant operations and injection have been

constant except for intervals of a few days when the plant has been

closed for routine maintenance (fig. 3).

History from 1973 to 1975

In June 1973, the disposal well was shut down for repairs to the

liner. The work was completed about 1 year later, in June 1974.

The total depth of hole and bottom of liner remained unchanged at

2,242 ft (683 m) and 1,939 ft (591 m), respectively. Present (1975)

construction is shown in figure 2. The disposal well was returned

to service in July 1974, and has remained constinuously in operation

except for 30 days in September - October 1974.

In 1974, shortly before the disposal well was returned to service,

it was discovered that water was being lost from the deep monitor well

annulus circulatory system. Investigation showed that the bottom 16 ft

of the inner stainless steel liner had been damaged. Repairs were

completed in January 1975. To prevent further problems, the teflon

packer was replaced with acid-proof cement.

12

CO o en g H a H

30 20-

10-

(38

.8)

14-a

VO

UU

MC

OF

(MIU

IOH

(k

K'JM

SCR b

(83.5

)318 r

r

1 g! i ^ i

(82-5

) ,

315

nr

MET

RES 1 i ii i

#^i

1 ;-g

Jf

tg;

i^L

MM

-120

-80

M

P3 s-4

0

iqyo

m

im

s

^ Waste

disc

harged into injection well.

0 Waste

disc

harged in

to de

ep m

onit

or well.

D No in

ject

ion.

Figu

re 3. Volume of

waste in

ject

ed,

December 19

66 - Ma

rch

1975

. (Dat

a furnished by Quaker

Oats

Co.)

RESULTS

Chemi stry of Wast e

The waste is hot, acidic and highly organic. The average pH is

3.2, and it contains high concentrations of nitrogen, carbon, and

phosphorus (table 2). The total organic carbon concentrations ranged

from 540 to 12,000 mg/1 (milligrams per litre). The suspended solids

exceeded 1,110 mg/1. The chloride concentrations ranged from 80 to

300 mg/1. The specific gravity of the waste ranged from about 1.000.

to 1.006 at 20°C. Owing largely to the high temperature of the waste,

it is less dense than the native ground-water. Based on the relative

density of water, the estimated density of the waste at 80 C is about

0.98 g/ml (grams per millilitre); the density of native brackish or

saline fluids within the depth range investigated is greater than

1.003 g/ml.

Chemistry of Native Fluids and Composition of Aquifer Rock

Water analyses (table 3) from the Experiment Station well, 3 miles

southeast of the injection site, were collected from 1971-75. The

analyses show the chemical character of the native brackish-saline fluid

from the upper part of the Floridan aquifer. Comparison of recent

(1975) analyses of water from this well with a partial chemical analysis

reported by Stringfield Q933) indicates that the chemical quality of

native fluid in the upper part of the Floridan aquifer at the well has

not changed significantly in the last 40 years. The chloride concen­

tration in 1933 was 1,650 mg/1. In 1975 it was 1,600 mg/1.

14;

Tab

le

2A

NA

LY

SES

OF

IND

UST

RIA

L VB

iSTE C

riK

M-

DATE

06..

06. .

OCT.

1H..

Ft H.«

01. ,

Ln

JULY

0 9

* .

OCI

.16

..NOV ,

Ob..

Ftb

. »04, .

APR. 11,.

TUK-

TEMHEK-

till

>-

TJME

DEPTH

ATURE

ITY

(FT)

(O

EG C)

(J

TU)

264227080390700 -

BELLE bLAUES «U

<

1973

'

1130

200

1'13

0

'

1130

76.0

540

1974

1200

1130

i

75.0

«5

0

1130

76.0

540

1200

65.0

1975

1100

65.0

420

1100

~

320

CIMC

COLOK

CON-

(PLA

T-

OUCT-

INUH

- AN

C6

CUbA

LT

(MICWO-

UMTS)

MHOS

)

men

OATS IN

MOST

3200

1^90

2200

2100

31

00

900

1640

2300

?4

00

3100

6000

31

*0

1500

38

00

2400

29rt

O

OAYi'KN

(HU-h

PH

OIOXIDF

LLVt

L)

(C02)

(MG/L)

(UNI

TS)

(MG/L)

WASTt

<LAl 26

2530

0 --'

2630

0 --

29000

-

2630

0

2500

0

2000

0

42 27 LO

NG

3.0

2.9

3.1

2.9

2.9

3.1

3.0

, .

3.3

4.0

. .

.060

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

ALKA­

LINITY

AS

CAC03

(MG/

L) ,

39 07) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

TOTAL

/»CIOITV

AS

CAC03

(MG/L)

1*500--

9430

5460

.

10300

93bO

5160

2260

(HC0

3)(M

G/L)

0 0 0 0 0

o 0 0 0

Tab

le

2.

ANA

LYSE

S OK

IND

USTR

IAL

TAST

E co

n't

DATF

DIS­

SOLVED

SODIUM

(NA)

(MG/L)

SODIUM

AD­

SORP­

TION

RATIO

PERCENT

SODIUM

OIS-

SOLVED

PU-

T&:>

-SIUM

(N)

(MG/L)

Plb-

SOLVtO

CHLO­

RIDE

(CD

(MG/L)

DIS­

SOLVED

SULFATE

(S04

) (M(,/L)

OIS-

SOLVtO

FLUO-

KIDE

(F)

(MG/L)

DIS­

SOLVED

SILICA

(SIO?)

(MG/L)

DIS­

SOLVED

ARSENIC

(AS)

(UG/L)

TOTAL

ARSENIC

(AS)

(UG/L)

264227080390700 -

BELLE BLADES QUAKER OA

TS IN

UUST

WASTE (LAT

26 42

27

LO

NG

JULY,

On.

. Oo,.

OCT.

1^.

. F?

-H.,

01..

JULY

<;v.

.OPT.

Ifc.

.,NOV.

0^..,

Ff h.»

<;<»..,

APH.

11..

.

1973

33.

« "

150

1974

190

110

«

150

. 1975

430

. '400

.7

2.5

6.9

1.9

* * *

2.0

8.2

7.9

10 25

61 19 Itt

50

5b

170

230 99

310

340

330

IbO

80X

210

ti*

160

^**

a-eo

300

270

180MM

2*Q

120

290

.

410

3^0

200

.

17

1.8 .5

22

--

1.5

13 3.5

28 70 21 35 70 44 38 29

OtfO

39

07) 14 14 0

13 4

Tab

le

2* A

NA

LYSE

S OH

IN

DUST

RIAL

TCIS

.TE -

cpn'

t

DATE

:

DIS­

SOLVED

ORTHO

PHOS-

PHATh

(P04)

(MG/L)

TOTAL

PHOS­

PHORUS

(P)

(MG/

L)

364337080390700

JULY*

06. ..

0*. ..

OCT.

1H...

Ff b.

*0 1 ..

.JULY

09. ..

Of.T,

.1 H

.

NOV.

Ob...

Ft.B

. »

'.)4...

A;'H

..lie..

1973

*--

i

».1974

--

.1975

27

27

.00 ..

47 28

.

23 12

DIS­

SOLVED

O^TfO.

PHOS

­PHORUS

(P)

(MG/L)

- BELLE

-_. ' .

-- --

. ...

8.9

01S-

SOL-

TO

TAL

TOTAL

VEO

in-

TOTAL

'ORGANIC

ORGANIC

OPGAM1C

TOT/"L

SUL-

CAR8

0N

CA^b

ON

CAKdON

CAKM

ON

FIDE

(C)

(C)

(C)

(C)

(S

)(M

G/L)

(M

G/L)

(M

G/L)

(M

G/L)

(M

«/L)

GLAUfcS

QUAKER O^TS IN

'IUS

T WASTE (L

AT 26

43

37

7000

43

13000

7500

13000

.

9000

5<»U

.

HAHU-

NESS

(CA«NG)

(MG/L)

LONG Od

O

460

690

140

- 610

,100

0

530

490

NON-

CAM-

HO'MATE

HA HO-

:NF

.SS

(MG/

L)

39 OM

460 --

690

140

610 --

1000

520

490

OIS-

SOLVtO

CAL­

CIUM

(Cik

)

(MG/

L)

110

-.

160 50 140

260

130

120

t>IS-

SOLVED

MAG-

NF-

SIUM

(MG)

(MG/

L)

45..

70

'

4.2

*3

V5

48 45

Tab

le

2. A

NALY

SES

OF I

SD'JS

TKIA

L JTA

STE

con

't

I'Tb-

"JS-

UIS-

SOLVED

^'J-^'c

S'"-V

e:0

'"^

TOTa

<- SOLVEO

TOtAL

ALU«E°

SUS.

*£J"

,|»I

I'W

** «<> .

«-

<THO

TOTAL

"s

?s?

'ft,

ssrfss

fe ?'

1T?

--

-""

D-'-' A

CI"Tr

OATE

(U

5/L)

C

W/L

, (U

G/U

-u

s

jH^e

, ru

e-

^

^.^

. ^

^.^

-OL

r.

26"

27

0B

°3

90

70

0

*

BE

LL6

6LA

1>E

S "*«

" «« «

«

,L.T

»

«

.T

LO

N(i

080

3, ,

06

»«

»

47

0

_

ft7

*in

0^

-

-

-

67!!

~

916

23

...

2S,

OC

T.

..

db

l*~

* 1

M

..

fv>

io

»

»

An

nK

I:H

.*

19

74

""

^40

° <

*50

1

34

0

12

.0

.00

^r*

""

6o -

nso

414

.67y

,56

_ _

uoo??."

*

""

. b

°°

-

15y

° '

' 97^0

13

40

13.2

35

^..

. .

NO

V.

' ""

'

..

2t,

FKh.'»"l975

""

110°

""

1110

13900

1770

18

.Vii&

' .

"" In9

AP':"

"

. J*°

-

1^0

I2b00

1750

11...

'

. .

^^Q

6.60

Tab

le

2. A

NALY

SES

OF

INDU

STRI

ALIS

TS c

on't

DATE

J'-J

LV*

i) 6 ....

06. ..

OCT

.ie

...

FFH..

) 1

. .

.

0 V ...

OCT, !h.

..NO

V..

o s *

Fi

iH.t

04...

APR.

11*..

( -

TOTAL

CAH-

NITRO-"

BONATE^'"

'" GEN

'"(C

03)

(N)

(MG/L)

(MG/L)

1973

, o

.' ,

.0

(i.

r ,94

0" r.

,h : -if

. . ,

0 '

. .13b

.'/

1974

'ii .

. .

0 ' "

>

i

. i '

; .13

8If...

-*"v

138

: '

-...

',, .

. )...»

1975

-I'..

-

146

M

,0

TOTAL

OKGANIC

NITRO­

GEN

c". (N)

(MG/L)

1 -

BF.L

LE

.73

124

..

119

1E4

..

140 75

OIS-

SOLVtO;

.AMMONIA

NITKO-,

i CKN M

(M)

(MG/L)

, , , AMMONIA

NITkO-

(-EN

1

(N)

(MG/L)

GLADtS UUAKEH OATS

..

.-

'(IK

i(.

'

' 'y*

.. ...* MO

..' .

M-~

'

?1..

14

' .^.

' <

IV 14

. 6.8

4,4

UIi»-

iMS-

SOLV

tji)

TOT«L

'SOIVFD

NIT^ITF.

NITRITE

NITPATE

(N>

(N)

(N)

(MG/

L)

(MG/L)

(MG/

L)

IN'JUST

WASTE (LAT 2b 4^

27

"

,0b

\t

-

'"*

;oo

...

,

' ' °

'..

..

..

" '*

..

' 1 4

' s

..

t

, i

«t

"

I

.00

1 ..

' ..''-.-

> ..

.0

5 i

"

11 .1

2

' .1

9

1

TOTAL

NITKATF

(N)

(HG/L)

LON<

^ 0»

0

.00 -_

.05

..

.00

OS .. .00

TOTAL

KJEL-

Lsft

HLMTHO-,

GFN

(N)

(MG/L)

39 07),

-.

..

..

..

138

--

146 79

DJS-

TOTAL

, . S

OLVED

NITRITF.

, NITHITf

HH'S

PLUS

NlTRATp

,NIT

PATF

« (N

) , (M

(MG/

L)

(MG/

L)

..

..

.-

r"'

'4

""

..

^ ..

'

1

' '

'.

-'

t}n

I4

t '"'

..

.. _

..

.05,

,,t

.31

Tab

le

2. A

NA

LYS

ES

of

INDU

STRI

AL S

ASTE

con

* t

TO T

OP

DIS

_ or

s_

TOTA

L of-

.

TOTA

L'SOLVED

SOLVED

MAM-

NlTnO-

s'AT

Ert-

I>EPTH

SHE-

NITkATE

N17PITE

(?AN

£S£.

If'OM

<*t>

SEALING

SAMPLE

OF

CIFIC

(N03

) (N0<f)

(MM)

(FE)

(N0:<)

20NE

SOUKCE

WELL

GRAVITY

DATE

(MG/L)

(MG/

L)

(UG/L)

(Ub/L)

(MG/L)

(FT)

(FT)

264237060390700 -

BELLE GLADES OUAKER OATS*

INOUST WASTE (LAT 26

42 27

LONG Ot

tO 39

JULYt 1973

06...

'

06

. ..

g

OCT.

FE9.»

01..

. JULY

Ov...

' --

612

u

.1.0

OCT.

.

.

.

MOV.

Ob...

--

4H

FEtf

., 1975

04..

.

647

43

1.0

APH. 11.'

..

.80

.39

41

1.0

Tab

le

2. A

NALY

SES

OF

INDU

STRI

AL T

KASX

E co

n't

DATE

JULYf

0('..«

06. ..

OC"!

.1

t> .

F fc b

. »

0 I ...

JULY

OS...

ocu

R...

nov. Ob...

F E r

. »

04...

/ DL

/.rn

11...

HEXA-,

TOTAL

VALENT

CAD-

CHRO­

MIUM

MIUM

(CD)

(Cft6)

(UG/L)

(U

G/L)

264227080390700

1973

*1

'.

219

741

0

;2

.

....

..

17

01975

0 4

0 0

TOTAL

Dlb-

CHnO-

SOLVED

MIUM

.COPPEK

(CH)

(CU)

(UG/L)

(UG/

L)

- bELLE GLADES <H

30^

o , 35

-

<10

900

170

0

TOTAL

COPKEM

(CU)

(UG/L)

JAKt

K UAl

100 100

120 SH 110

1200

1100

TOTAL

DIS­

SOLVED

(UG/L)

(UG/L)

UATS IN

I/US

T WASTE

SOLV

ED

TOTAL

LEAO

LE

AD(Pfc)

(PtO

(UG/L)

. (U

G/L)

DIS-

DIS-

TOTAL

SOLVED

SOLVED

MAN-

MAM-

ST#ON-

GANESE

GANFSE

TJUM

(MN)

(MNO

(SR)

(UG/L)

(UG/L)

27OtfO 39

07)

240

660

230 3)

16

00 2

3700

Tabl

e 3.-Analyses of well water

at University of

vi

<*

niversity

of Florida

Experimental St

atio

n.coc _

......

DATF

TIME

TEMPEK-

DEPTH

ATUW£

<FT)

1*..

.OCT.

1971

1973

1300

1300

1600

1600

1700

1700

JUL 06 ...

14

00

Fr.H

.» 19

7401

...

1400

JUL*

09.,..

1400

FF

.M-.

1975

11,.

. Hoo

MAY 14,..

0915

2640000«0375001 -

22.0

24.5

24.5

26.0

26.0

23.5

23.5

26.0

26.0

TU*-

BIO-

1TY

(JTU

)

1 -

-- 15 1

« 1 2 a 2 1

Cut. OK

(HLAT-

INUM-

COBALT

UNITS) PH 5 0

10 5

>» 5

10 4 3

SPE-

CI-I

CCUN-

OUCT-

ANCE

(MICRO-

MHOS

)

203

<LAT

51«0

6200

6100

5100

6240

6000

44bO

6000

SHOO

6030

5000

CHEM

­ICAL

OXYl^N

OE'^NU

CAtf

bON

(HlHH

pH

OI(»

XIDF

LtVf-L)

(CO*

) <Mii/L)

(UNI

TS)

- (MG/L)'

26 40 00 LONG OtiO 37

50.01)

6.3

'

B.I

5 7,(»

-,

..b.O

2.7

36

ft. 3

i y

^ * J

I c

7.2

33

7.8

4.0

«.0

?.7

lie

a.i

i Q

w *

I . 7

7.6

6.3.

78

H.I

2.0

69

7.8

^>9

62

ALKA-

TOT/li.

LIWITY

ACIDITY

AS

AS

CAC03

CAC03

(MG/L)

26

125

131

136

139

121

129

1S7

5.0

5.0

rtlC

AR-

BONA

TE:

(HC0

3) 32

152

160

166

151

156

170

14*

157

lt>4

192

5700

Table

3. Analyses of well wat

er at University of Florida

Experimental St

atio

n-^

Cont

,

DIS­

SOLVED

SODIUM

(NA)

DATF

(MQ/L)

JUN.

i, 1971

I*..

. 900

OCT.

19...

960

IV...

MAP.. 19

72?H...

920

*J W

MM

c r

«

* .

^~

D.:C.

lb...

950

Ib...

APR.. 1973

19...

QfcO

1 O

__

i. v

. .

.

JULY

06...

1000

06...

FJfK.. 19

7401

...

1100

JUL

r09...

900

FS.H

.- 1975

1 1 ...

KAY

SODIUM

. SOLVED

AD-

PO-

SOKP-

ToS-

TION

PERCtNT

SIUM

RATI

O SO

DIUM

(«)

(M(,/L>

264000080375001 - 26 3*

--

...

. ..

13

67

34

14

6b

31..

14

70

32

15

71

40

76

36

13

67

3t>

nib-

UN­

SOLVED

ois-

SOLVED

CHLO-

SOLVtO

FLUO-

KIDE

SULF

ATF.

KIOE

(CD

<SO<O

(F)

(Mb/L)

(MG/L)

(MO/L)

PH 203 (LAT 26

40

00

li>M

O 456

,4

1620

522

.9--

1600

510

1.2

1700

540

1.0

--

' --

b?o

.9

1700

500

1.0

--

--

1700

530

.V

1600

520

1.0

--

-~

--

DIS-

DI

SOLV

ED

SOLV

ED

TOT«L

SILICA

ARSfcNlC

ARSENIC

(SIC'V)

(AS)

(AS)

(MG/

L)

(UG/L)

(UG/L)

LONG 0«

0 37

50.01)

.5

0

19

10

-

12

0

8.7

10-

-

12

1

13

4 /13

"

'()

13

2

. . «

«.

DIS-

DIS-

SOLVED

SOLVKD

CAO-

BOWON

^IUM

(f:)

(C

D)(U

G/L)

(U

G/L)

..

0 n

o r..

--

..

mtm

****

**

. ^**

' *

ilB

1600

DIS­

SOLVED

OPTHO

PHOS­

PHAT

E

Tabl

e 3. Analyses of

well water at University of Florida

Experimental Station cont

ois-

r-is

-SOLVEU

SuL-

TOTAL

TOTAL

OHTHO.

TOT/

-L

VEf>

I-v-

PHOS-

PhOS-

OKGANIC

OMtiAMC

PHORUS

PHOWUS

GAMMON

CAHHON

(P)

(P)

(C)

(C)

(C)

TOTAL

(C)

TOTAL

bUL-

HAf'U-

NESS

HA"D

(CAt

KG)

NtSS

UIS-

1'IS

- SOLVH)

SOLV

FTn

*Mi-

CAL-

NF-

CIUM

SlUM

(C/O

(N'«

)(MG/L)

(MG/L)

(MG/L)

(MG/L)

(MG/L)

(MR/L)

(MG/L)

(MG/L)

(MG/L)

(MG/

L)

(MG/L)

(MG/L)

2640000b0375001 -

Kb 203

26 40

00

OHO

37 bO.Ol)

1971

!<»*

..

.02

CCT.

19...

.03

lv.

. .

^A^.« 1972

?«..

.

DEC.

Ib...

Ib..

.APR.. 1973

19..

.1 7

<^i»

OC-...

06...

FfcH

.t 1974

01...

JULY

09...

FEB.* 1975

11..

MAY 14..

.

.- .- .02

.'." .00

--

.00

.00

.!

.02

.02

. .00

*

.. ,

'

--.

2.0 .0

_~

_-

--

10. 2.0

1.0

,033

.

'

692

922

_-

. --

.-

-_

__

.0

31

31

950

29

' 950

...

--

--

--

--

34

44

4,0

910

32

.34

B20

«.s

/31

32

' 700

30

30

V30

'-- --

..

..

666

797 --

H?0

H20 __ 7«0

700 --

b60

770 --

62

130...

140

140..

140

130 ..

.

ISO

140

..

1?6

140

140

140

130

1?0 flO

140

Tab

,le,

3.^

An

aJ,y

Ses.

of

wel

l w

at;e

r, ,

at U

niv

ersi

ty,

,of

Flo

rid

a

Exp

erim

enta

l, S

tati

on

-cen

t .

,

DATF

'

DIS­

SOLVED

TOTAC

ZINC''

ZINC

(ZN)

» (Z

N)>

1 (UG/L)

nis-

"TM

SOLVED

ALUM­

INUM (AL)

'

(UG/L)

SOLVEO

SOLVED'

" '

t Sl'lli'S

SULIUS

sus-

i<

CM-S

I-

(SUM

ur

PENDEO"

DUE

AT

CONSTI-

SOLIOS

1*0

C)

TUtNTS)

(MG/L) '

> (MG/L)

(MvJ

/L)

i

Ulb

-

SOLlUS

("0\

-S

TOTA

LU

rtT

HO

P

r<O

S-

{P>

TOTAL

OIS_

DENSITY

ACIDITY

SOLVED

TOTAL

{b«/Ml.

AS

AMMONIA

MTPATF

AT

H*

(NH4)

, (N03)

AC-i

-T)

(MG/L)

i 20 C)

(MG/L).

- (MG/L)

(MG/L),

264000080375001

*

JUNK* 19

71

!14...'-

30":'

OCT. \V. ..'

BO'

1 *

1 V

. .

. -

Mr

,W.

« 1972'

^?b.

.

- -

60

ore.

1

15..

..

19.

19

73

'

0 6

. .

.

»Ftfi.» 197V-

ri...-

-Jl

.'LV

('9.

..-

- Ff

«.t 1975

0

20"

30"^

10''

,

\ 1.

4'!-

PB 203 (LAT.26 40 00 LON6 OHO 37-50.0])

31 7C

3bOO

3680

3BOO

3400

3600

3580

-r

3690

5.00

3450

5.17

00

.00

.00

.01

.01

00

1.0

04

.0

p.p

J4...--

Tabl

e 3._Analyses of well water

at Un

iver

sity

of Florida

Experimental Station cont

DATF

.

JUN'

t*1<*. .

*OCT.

19...

19...

MAW. t

?H. .

.i>

H. .

.

DEC.

Ib...

APR..

IV...

19...

JULY

06.

..06. ..

FFh.t

01...

JULY

09...

FEH.»

11...

MAY 14...

CAK-

BONATE

(C03)

(MG/L)

1971

0 0--

1973

0 0 0

1973

0-- 0

--

1974

0 01975

-

Ulb-

TOTAL

SULV

tf)

TOTAL

OKliANlC

AM10N1A

AMMONIA

U[S-

OlS-

NI1KO-

NIT^O-

NlTnO-

NITHO-

SOLVtU

TOT,

"L

SOLVED

TOTAL

GEN

GEN

GtN

C-tN

NIT^ITF

NITHITK

NlTf^A\TE

NITF

^ATE

(N)

(N)

(N)

(N)

(M)

(M)

(M)

(N)

(MG/L)

(MG/L)

(MG/L)

(MG/L)

(MG/L)

(MG/L)

(MH/L)

(MG/L)

2640000ti0375001 -

PH 303 (LAT 26 40 00 LONG ObO 37 50.01)

.00

.00

.

--

--

-_

--

--

_-

-.

Q$

.^d

.00

.00

.00

__

--

_-

..

--

_-

..

0(f

.65

-

-'-.02

.Ib

.'to

--

.00

--

.00

7d

,lt>

. .f£

--

.00

.00

--.

_-

--

..

-_

--

..

-.

f '

.31

.6V

.00

.00

.60

.01

.60

.00

.00

i

.00

.64

--

.00

--

.00

.-

...

TOTAL

KJFL-

TOT/

«L(>f

ti->|_

NITRITE

MTnO-

PLUS

GEN

NlTPdTF

(N)

(N)

(MG/L)

(MG/L)

----

..

--

--

--

--

-_

--

.-

..

-.

.61

. .00

..

..

..

to

Tabl

e 3. Analyses of

we

ll w

ater at University of

Fl

orid

a Ex

peri

ment

al St

atio

n co

nt.

DATE

JUNE.

OCT.

IV. .

.

IV.. .

MAK. T

38...

OEC.

Ib...

IV...

JULY

Ob...

FF. B.«

01...

JULY

0V.. .

FEH.»

11...

MAY

14...

OIS_

SOLVtO

NITHATE

(N02

) (MG/L)

1971

.00

.00

1973

.00

1973

1974

.00

1975

TO TO

PDI

S_

TOTA

L oi-

TO

TAL

SOLVED

MM-

NjTnO-

^ATEK-

I'E^Tn

SH

NITKITE

GANE

SF.

IKON

r,£N

BEAr

flNf

i SA.PLf

OF

GIF

(NO?

) (MN>

.(FE

) (N

O.'i

) ZONE

SOUKCE

WELL

6PAV

(MG/L)

(UG/L)

(UG/LJ

(MG/L)

(FT)

(FT)

264000.080375001 -

PH 303 (LAT

?t>

40 00

LOP.

'« OHO 37 50.01)

.01

10

40

1332

.00

0

fO

1333

.00

2o7

' /

.

1

'

: 1

1.0

TO HOT-

TO* OF

SUS-

SAI-

PlE

PENUED

INTEK-

SFOI-

VAL

KENT

(FT)

(MG/L)

1333

Tabl

e 3. Analyses of we

ll water

at University of

Fl

orid

a Ex

peri

ment

al Station cont

TOTAL

CAD­

MIUM

(CD)

DATF

(UG/L)

HEAA-

VALENT

CHKO-

MIUM

' (CK6)

(UG/

L)

TOTAL

IHS-

CHHO-

SOLVED

MlllM

COPPEK

(CP)

(CU)

(UG/L)

(Ub/

L)

264000080375001 -

JUNF

.. 19

71K.

OCT.

IV...

i u

_

j * »...

«

MAh.. 1972

?b...

0?H...

DEC.

Ib...

N5

13...

oo

AP*.» 1973

IS). ..

019...

JULY

0 «

'»..

.A (^

-..._

IJ rv » »

9

»

FEK.t 1974

01...

1JULY

09...

1FE

fa.t

1975

11..

.MAY

0 0 0 0 0

- 0 0

.

..

0 0,

*" "* 10 ly

0 10

-.

._ 10

»-

X10 -~

>-

.

OIS-

OIS-

TOTAL

TOTAL

SOLVED

SOL.

VFC)

TOTAL

COPPKK

IWOA»

* I«

ON

LfAO

LEAD

(CU)

(Kf}

(h»

(Pn)

(Pr.)

(UG/L)

(U(7

/L)

(UG/L)

(UG/L)

(Ufa

/L)

Po 203 (LAT 26

40 00

LONC?

080 37

50.01)

o

0

10

140

70

0 0

0

« «

~_

1

v

«_

._

.

i

f6

"' 0

3 .....

3/

.

..

..

..

._

.

OIi>

-TOT«L

SOLVEO

MAN-

WAN-

GANESE

tANF.SE

(MN)

(H^)

(UG/L)

(UG/

L)

..

..

10

10

..

..

--

..

« .

».

-. .- .

l>.

--

..

..

..

nis-

SOI. VEO

STPOM-

TIUM

(?f<

)(UG/L) ..

16000

leoo

o ..

1800

0 .. .. «._

3900 -

14..

.

Analysis of native fluid samples collected from the lower part of

the Floridan are given in Table 4, for March 1971. Analyses following

that date were made after waste injection into the deep monitor well had

occurred. .All the analytical data show that the native fluids are

basically of the sodium-chloride type, but include appreciable quantities

of sulfate, magnesium and calcium. The chemistry and potential uses of

these brackish to saline artesian waters in southern Florida are discus­

sed by Vernon (1970) and Meyer (1971).

In November 1971, the U.S. Geological Survey performed an X-ray

diffraction analysis of the rocks of the injection zone and confining

beds to determine their mineralogical composition. The interval from

1,495 to 1,600 ft is predominantly calcite, with about 2 percent quartz.

The zone from 1,885 to 1,925 contains considerable dolomite and about 2

percent quartz. From 1,985 to 2,080., ft. the rock is 55 percent calcite

and 35 percent dolomite. There are no analyses for the intervening zones.

- - - - Geochemical Effects

" ^ ' Deep Monitor Well

~As mentioned, earlier, the deep monitor well was used for waste

injection from October 1971 to January 1972, while the disposal well was

being deepened. When the disposal well was put back in service, waste

that had been injected into the deep monitor well was allowed to backflow<5

continuously at 2 - 3 gal/min (O.pl-0.02 nr/s). This backflow was

periodically sampled to provide information on geochemical interactions

and ultimate fate of the waste in the aquifer, including anaerobic

decomposition.

The first pH determinations of the backflow fluid, made by the com­

pany, showed that the injected waste was partly neutralized almost imme-

29

Tabl

e 4. Analyses of

water

from

de

ep mo

nito

r well cont

to O

TIME

DATF.

MAfc.» 1971

MAP.. 1972

SfcP

.

DEC.

15..

.15..

APfr

.«19...

19..-

FEB..

04..,

APR.

11..

1973

1975

1400

1400

1230

1230

1230

1230

1200

120U

1200

1030

7EMPEK-

DEPTH

ATUt

tE

(FT)

(O

E.G 0

CULUH

CO?-

1-

IHYi

'hN

ALKA-

TOTAL

TUK-

(PLAT-

DUCT-

UtMA

Nt)

OKMON

LlNlTY

/>CIDITY

till

/-

IMUM-

ANCt

(HU-H

PH

OIOJIDF

AS

AS

ITY

COtf

ALT

(MlC

rVO-

LEVtL)

(CO?)

CAC03

CAC03

(JTU)

UNITS)

MHOS)

(MCVL)

(UNITS)

'(N«G/L)

(MG/L)

(MG/L)

BICAH-

(HC03)

(MCVL)

2642000B03V0002 -

43S37E28 2

DEEP

(Lft

T 26 42 00

LOM- OHO 39 00.02)

24.6

40.0

40.0

32.0

32.0

26.0

28.0

30.0

30. U

29.0

1495

'

31.5

10

., -

'. .

. 0

37UD

8.2

1.5

125

65

900.

103UO

7.6

199

4070

6.2

100

1000

125(

10

6.9

1100

4490

10300

5.9

300

520

H740

- 16000

7.4

214

2760

199

6200

6.2

300

. 6UO

9000

3500

6.tf

1390

4460

1140

. 5000

6.b

1420

4590

6 30

7t»0

40

.

.

59

.0

70

1400

3UO

2300

0 3.

6 ".0

0 71

50

152

4960

5480

3360

5460

5600 72 0

Tabl

e 4.-Analysed

of w

ater

fr

om'd

eep

moni

tor we

ll-c

ont.

DIS­

SOLVED

SODIUM

(NA)

DA

TF

(MG/L)

MAH.. 1971

1>JS-

SODIUM

SOLV

EO

nis-

ois-

'

f T

cn

«p~

?°~

SoLvtu

OIS-

&'u.ito.

-Dis-

uis-

.

,nrs->

S.LVFO

E

TSS5

K S?

s"-

> '

-- -- --«

--

" S K

'RATIO

SODIUM

(K)

(CD

(S04)

(F)

{sro£)

(AS)

(A

S)

(P

)

(CD)

<M(,

/L)

(«(,

/(.)

(MG/L)

(M6/L)

(MG/L)

(UG/

L)

(UG/L)

(UG/

L)

(UG/L)

2642000803V0002 -

43S37E28 2

DEEP

' (LAT 26

42

00 LONG Oh

O 3V

00.0?)

18...

5070

'-*

..'

1H,

MAH.

27.

?7.

SFP.

?M.

2rt.

DFC.

Ib.

Ih.

APR.

19.

IV.

FEB. 04.

APFT.

11.

492

1972

800

880

.

t.

820

' 1973

680

"*19

75

70

210

8.5

4. to

5.3 «>»

5.1

4.3

2.5

2.9

62 23 27 26 2<»

50 27

1H

140

130

130

100 4.

5

210

920

340

1300

22

*

»

1300

11

870

4.0

120

85

220

260

1.5

3.3

'J U

1, 7

1.4

.6 **

.7

11

14 58**" *

12

75

65

11 75

--

10

10

15-

1.

3./ "

11

«.

..

? -

..--

0--

0--

..

* *

MM

>><

Tabl

e 4. Analyses of

water

from

dee

p mo

nito

r well cont.

DATE

DIS­

SOLVED

OW7HO

PHOS-

PHATt

(P04

)(MG/L)

TOTAL

PHOS­

PHORUS

(P)

(MG/L)

DIS­

SOLVED

OPTHO.

PHOS­

PHORUS

(P)

(MG/L)

I lb-

SOL-

TOTA

L VET*

ORGANIC

ORGANIC

CARBON

CAHbON

(C)

(C)

(MG/L)

(MG/L)

264200080390002 -

43S37E28 t

MAR.«

1 H

»

1H...

MAH. »

27, ..

27...

SrP.

?h...

OFC. Ib..

.Ib..

.APH..

19. .

.19...

F£b.»

04...

APR. 11...

1971

'

.00

1972

24-- .. --

1973

...

...

1975

. 40

--

8.0 --

9.9

2.2 --

3.2 .02

17

I-.

-- -- --

13

--

3B70

3725

-.

--

3800

1460--

_-

1370

_

--

17

7bO

TOTA

LIN­

ORGANIC

CAKbON

(C)

(MG/L)

OEEP (LAT

..

330-._

-12

0

900

780 ..

TOTA

LTOTAL

SUL-

HAHU-

CAKt

tON

FlOf

c"

NtSS

(C)

($)

(CA.NG)

(MG/L)

(Mfi

/L)

(MG/L)

26 42 00 LOMP 08

0 39

00.0

2)

" !666

420U

61UO

__

. __

--

3900

5200

2360

4900

--

..

-_

2150

87

4700

~-

...

-_

150.

/.

.-

V90

NON-

CAR-

fcOMATE

HA4D-

NF.SS

(MG/L)

^54

1

2100

670

2100 --

190-- 87

990

OJS-

SOLV

fcO

CAL­

CIUM

(CA)

(MG/

L)

97

1100--.

1400

1200

--

.

1200

«.

53

240

Olb-

SOLVt.O

MAGr

Nf-

SIUM

(MG)

(MG/

L)

94

700..

400

450__

400--

3.3

94

DATE

Tabl

e A. Analyse

s of w

ater

from deep

mor'

.tor

well cont

OIS-.

SOLVED

., TOTAL

ZINC

,, ZINC,

<ZN)..

(ZN)

(UG/L)

(UG/L)

DIS­

SOLVED

ALUM-

SUS-

iNUN

i PEMDED

(AL)

SOLIDS!

{UG/D

<MG/L>

SuLV

fci'

SOL

I US

<H£SI-

DUE AT

IfO C)

(MG/L)

SOLVED

SOL IUb

(bUM OF

CONSTI­

TUENT:))

(MG/L)

DIS­

SOLVED

SOL I US

(TONS

PF.H

AC-FT)

TOTA

LOKlHO

PMOS-

PHOKUS

(p)

(MG/L)

DENSITY

(6M/ML

AT20 C)

TOTAL

ACIDITY

AS

H*(MG/L)

TOTA

L AM

MON'

IA

' NI

T&AT

F.(NH4)

(N03)

(MG/L)

MAN,* 1971

50

2642000603V0002 -

43S37E2H 2

DEEP

(L

AT 26

42

00 LONG 0^

0 39

00

.0?)

60IP

.,.,

,

. , -^

HAH., 1972

^7.». "

, *OMM

?7... .

. , '

SEP.

^M

»

, .

--.. .

5kl

CO

.

"

DEC.

lb..."

..

..1 h ..."

APK.. 1973

IV...,,

10-

1 9 .... ,.; ,..

FEb..

1975

04...

- .

APK.

.

. i

«r

n..._.

__ M ,

''

.

) ,

''

,-

* *

20

P

« A . ?

10

..

360rj

--

--

...

«.

__

' 1 1

*

1

372

i1 " .

'ib32-

..

1 '

'

64

...

. i

i r n

-.

.'

6

1000

'»-

__

-- .. --

41?

8300

2040

6800 «...

7500

) '

5670

» «

6060

..

i

383

1460

m if

_

~ **^

_.

..

BBM>

.66

11.3

7.9

6? 2.

1

1.007

4.0

23" .0

144

.10

Tabl

e 4. Analyses of

water

from dee

p mo

nito

r well cont.

DATF

MAR.»

1 'H

. .

.IH

. . .

PAK.

27...

^7...

Ct' 0

ot K

<fb...

?n .

.

DEC.

IS...

Ib...

APK.»

19...

19...

Ft"8.»

04...

APH.

11...

CAK-

BONATE

. (C03)

(MG/L)

1971

0 01972

0

0 0--

1973

0 019

75

0

TOTAL

OHGANIC

NITRO-

NITHO-

GEN

GEN

(N)

(N)

(MG/L)

(MG/L)

2642000803V

».»

«

-_

--

7.9

--^

--

3.2

.

5.6

--

--

8.5

--

--

.94

.89

86

DIS-

TOTAL

SULVtU

AMMONIA

fJlTKU-

GKN

(M)

(MG/L)

264300080390002 -

43S37E2B d

DEEP

(LAT 86

42 00 LONG OH

O 39 00

.0?)

NIT

MO

- S

ULV

KD

T

OT

"L

SO

l.VF

O

TO

TA

L('fN

N

ITrt

lTF

. N

ITH

ITE

N

ITP

AT

F

NIT

KA

TF

(N)

(M)

(N)

(N)

(N)

(MG

/L)

(MG

/L)

.00

11

22

12 9.b .0

2

'8.7

.Ob

.01

.03

.41

*»«

.00

.00

.02.

TOTAl.

KJEL-

TOTAL

OIS-

SOLVED

MT^O-

HH'S

PLUS

GFN

NITRATF

NITPATF

( N )

< N )

( M )

(MG/L)

(MG/L)

(MG/L)

.VI

.03

.09

.03

94

.12

Table 4.-Analyses of: water

from dee

p mo

nito

r well-cent.

OATF

;

DIS_

, SO

LVED

' SO

LVf.

0 .

. MAN-

.NITRATE

NITHITE^

GANESt

,'N03)

(N0<f)

(MN)

(HG/

L)

(MG/

L)

(U6/

L)

ToToL

l>F.

f»1h

TO

TOP

Of-

(FE)

(Ub/L)

'.;t^

6EAHING

SAMPLE

(NO?

) 20

NE

SOUKCE

(MG/L)

(FT)

TOT/

.L

.

DEPTH

OF

CIFIC

WELL

GRAVITY

(FT)

HAH., 19

71

1973

?7...

'27;..

' '"

Sff.

00

.10

2643000803VOOUZ -

43S37E38

"d DEEP U.AT

2t>

^2 00

LO

N.3

080 39

00.02)

U>

^EC,

1973

19...

1975

04...

PR.

11...

,10

4.2

.30

1.0

Tabl

e 4.--Analyses of

water

from

deep monitor well Co

nt.

HEXA-

UIS-

Hlb-

TOTAL

VALENT

TOTA

L DIb-

OIS-

Ulb-

TOTAL

SOLVED

SOLV

FO

CAD-

CMRO-

CH*O-

SOLVED

TOTAL

TOTAL

SOLV

ED

SOLVED

TOTAL

KAN-

MA

N-

STPON-

MIUM

MIUM

MIUM

COPPEH

COPPfH

I»-OM

IKON

LEAD

LFAU

6ANESE

GANFSF

TJUM

(CD)

(CRb

) (CH)

(CU)

<CU)

<F£)

<Fc)

<Ph>

(Pb)

<MN)

(MN)

(Sh)

DATP

(UG/

L)

<U

G/L)

(U

G/L)

(U

G/L)

(U

G/L)

(U

G/L)

(UG/L)

(UG/

L)

(UG/

L)

(UG/

L)

(UG/

L)

(UG/

L)

MAP., 1971

1H...

1H...

MAH.« 1972

?7...

i1?...

StP. ? H

"

* ?e...

OFC. Ib...

'

1 b .

. ,.

APH.« 1973

IV...

3 1 9

...

FEB.» 1975

04...

0APR; 11...

3

264200080390002 -

43S37E26 2

DEEP (L

AT 26'42 00

LONG OH

O 39 00.0?)

0

0*

0

20

2bOO

*

?00

15000

.

20

20000

0

20

3

24000

.

0 20

30

30

3 4

.. .. 23000

"*

««»

*»*^

mmm*

wm mm

1 70

61

22-

/ 0

270

16

190

diately, increasing in pH from 3.2 to 5.5. The Survey's analyses of

the fluid made after 75 and 160 days residence time, in a report by

Kaufman and others (1973), showed that the pH of the waste fluid con­

tinued to increase. In 75 days the pH was 6.2 and in 160 days it was

6.6.

Analyses of the fluid after 160 days residence time showed in­

creases in calcium, magnesium, and silica owing to the dissolution of

limestone. The acidic waste had developed an alkalinity (as CaCOrj)

of 3,500 mg/1. Hydrogen sulfide increased sharply, presumably due to

sulfate reduction by anaerobic bacteria. Kaufman and others (1973)

showed the existence of sulfate reducing bacteria in backflow from

the deep monitor well. No chemical analyses are available for fluids

from the deep monitor well for April 1973 - February 1975. During

this time the well either was used for waste injection or was being

repaired.

Shallow Monitor Well

Geochemical effects associated with the upward migration of the

-waste are shown especially well by the chemical analyses of water

from the shallow monitor well. Table 5 shows that calcium, magnesium

and alkalinity concentrations increased; there was a reduction in

sulfate concentrations; and generation of as much as 107 mg/1 of

hydrogen sulfide. Dissolution of the carbonate rocks, anaerobic

decomposition, and sulfate reduction within the subsurface environment

is indicated. Also, dissolved-gas analyses indicate the presence of

methane, nitrogen, and carbon dioxide.

37

Tabl

e 5.

-"-A

naly

ses

of water from sh

allo

w mo

nito

r we

ll.

00

SH»'

- CI

i- 1C

COLOK

CU*'

- TUrt-

(HI.

fit-

t'UCf-

TtMHER-

bll'-

IMJM-

ANCt'

TIME

DEPTH

ATURE

UY

CuBAtT

(MlCwO-

DATE

(FT)

(DEG C)

(JTU)

UMllb)

MHOS)

264200080390001 -

43S37E28

1 SHALLOW tLAT

MAH .

IH.

OCT.

20.

?(>.

MAR.

?b.

2H.

ecu

o C r .

?H.

OF(..

Ib.

Ib.

AHH.

1*.

IV.

JULY

06.

06.

OCT.

le.

PEP. 01.

MAY 03.

JULY

09.

NOV.

05.

FfH.

04.

APR.

11.

1971

* **

**

« .

"***

"***

0900

» 19721000

1000

1200

It! 00

1200

« 1973

..

1000

1000

1200

..

' 1200

1200

« 19741100

1400

1030

1400

1200

1400

1230

"1400

1975

1130

1400

1000

650

27.0 --

25.0

25.0

3t>.0

27.0

27.0

32.0

32.0

31.0 «

2^.0

34.5

26.0

27.0

26.0

--

..--

20 --

30

110

100 --

120 --

550

200

320

270

'

140

170

50

60--

20 -- <»o

120

40--

60

100

100

. loo

50

100

300

110

4550;

4500 --

45oO

43/?

0

4300

46,6

03700

4500'

3^00

4270

4200

4460

4610

4400

4400

3300

5300

4700

Out

-

IC^L

OXYv-i-N

A.LfA-

TOTAL

DKM"NU

CAHHON

LINHY

ACIDITY

(HI(..H

PH

01 OX IDE

AS

AS

LEVl-.L)

(C02)

. CAC03

CAC03

(Mvi/L)

(UNITS)

(MG/L)

(MG/L)

(Mti/L)

26 42 00

LOMG OHO 3V 00.01)

--

--..

.. --

1100 --

1100

320 --

1220

H600 57

1400

--

1300

1500

H.I

H,0

. --

6.6

6.4

5.7

H.2

6.5

6.6

6.6

7.1

6.4

7.0

6.6 ...

6.5

6.5

6.6

..

--

410

596

3290 10

..

41b

442

127

589

158

/422

640

jl200->"-

70V

522

902

910 --

-~.

H37

902

fi45

10

820

50

--

853

194

. 902

ft 1 7

.0759

808

* 35

b6l

20

1020

30

1040

1090

ilsn

1070

HICAR-

^OMTF

(HC03)

(MG/L)

1100

1110 --

10?0

1100

1030

1000 --

1040

1100

99/S

925

9H5

1050

1240

1264

1324

1400

1300

Tabl

e 5. An

alys

es of

wa

ter

from shallow mo

nito

r well cont

DATF

MAk.»

, 18...

OCT.

20...

?0...

MAR.

»?b...

?h. .

.bF.H.

2H...

inc. Ib...

Ib...

A-Pf . «

IV...

IV...

JULY

06...

Of-.

. .

OCT.

DIS-

,f

SOLVED

SODIUM

(NA)

(MG/L)

1971

478

500

1972480

500

500

1973

540

500

16...

550

FEM.» 1974

01 ...

MAY 03...

JULY

09..

. NOV.

520

550

500

05...

480

FEB.* 1975

04...

APR. 11..

.

500

500

DIS-

' '

SODI

UM

SOLV

ED

DIS-

AD

- PO-

" SOLVED

01S-

SOHP-

TAS-

CHLO-

SOLV

EDTION

PERCENT

SIUM

KlDt

SULF^TE

KATIO

SODIUM

(h)

(CD

(504

) ,-" >

(MG/D

(MCVL)

<MP>L)

264200080390001 -

43S37E2b

1 SHALLOW (LAT

5.7

5.7

5.9

6.2

6.2

6.5

6.0

7.0

5.6

5.4

5.6

5.5

43

42 44

44

47

46'

43

50 41 40

41

40

24

30 27

44

26 30 25

bO 32

31 35 35 b8 32

830

87U

940

860

900

400

860""

920

880

frbO

900

880

960

960

186

218~

210

310

180

240

170

' 160

170

130

250

190

50

110

DIS-

. SOLVED

DIS-

DIS-

FLUO-

SULVEU

SOLVED

HIDE

Sll IC

A AHStNIC

A (F)

,,, (S

IX)?

) (Ab)

(MG/L)

(HP/

L)

<UG/L)

26 *2

00

LON(i

080 39 00.01)

1.2

21

0

.9

.20

.9

23

1.0

?0

1 8

3--

1.0

. ?4

--

1.1

20

4v

-"

1.0

21

/9

1.0

22

1.2

?3

.3

24

1.2

23

1.0

'?4

.9

24

TOTAL

RSENIC

(AS)

(UG/L)

100

12 5 6 4 4 2

DIS­

SOLVED

BORON

(«}

(U6/

L)

690

DIS­

SOLV

ED'

C£D-

(CD)

(Ufl/L)

Tabl

e 5.

Ana

lyses

of w

ater

fr

om s

hall

ow monitor well cont

DATE

rtis-

. SOLVED

OPThO

PHOS-

PHATt

(P04)

(MG/L)

TOTA

LPHOS­

PHORUS

(P)

(MG/

L)

.015-

SOLV

fcO

ORTHO.

PHOS-

PHOHUS

(P)

(MG/L)

I.' I S-

SOL-

TOT/

«LTOTAL

VEi)

IN-

OH&ANIC

ORGANIC

ORGANIC

CARHON

CA^bON

CA^MON

(C)

(C)

(C)

(MG/L)

(MG/L)

(MG/L)

2o4200080390001 -

43S37E28

1 SHALLOW (L

AT

MAP.,

18 .

. .

OCT.

20...

efO

»

MAK. f

2h...

SEP'!**

2tf...

DEC. 15...

APH"**

I**...

JULY

v.'t

>...

Ob.

.

OCT.

16...

FtH.»

01...

MAY 03...

JULY

0V...

NOV.

05...

FEB.

»04...

APR. 11..

.

1971

.00

.23

-.19

72 --

1973

""

.. ...

..19

74.- .. _.

1975

40

.. .. ..

.14

.22

.02

.20

.02 ..

.06

.03

.14

.06

.-

.08

.15

..

.-..

--

--

.-

..

..

..

..

*13

..

^ ..

..3HO

365

340

135

2*0

--

70

334

194

274

146

237..

..

..

310

300

330

140

310

..

330

600

TOTA

LTOTAL

SUL-

HAPD-

CAReON

KlOh

NE

SS(C)

(S)

(CA«

Mb)

(MG/L)

(MG/L)

(MG/L)

26 42

00 LONG 08

0 3V

00

.01!

1450

1420

..

..

..

500

1400

3bO

IbOO

52H

1400

420

72

1500

40

1300

40

1300

1400

470

1200

IbOO

IbOO

1500

1600

NON.-

CAH-

HONATE

HAKD-

NESS

(MG/L)

1

549

510 ..

570

660

570

630

440 .. _

530

560

ISO

470

430

370

510

DIS­

SOLVED

CAL-

CIUM

(CA)

(MG/L)

25B

252 ..

.

250

270

260

280

240..

240

280

220

2VO

310

280

300

DIS-

SOLVFD

M&G-

NF-

SIUM

(t»'G)

<MG/L)

186

162..

180

190

170

180

150..

ieo

1PO

150

1.90

1PO

200

200

Tabl

e 5.-Ahalyses of

water

from

shallow monitor we

ll-c

orn:

.

OATf:

' <

MAF<.»

Itf.

..OCT.

20...

20...

MAR.'.

?H...

?H...

SfP.

^H.'..

OFC.

Ib...

15.'..

APK. .

l«y.

..IV...

JULY

Ob. .

.06...

OCT.

1 H ; . .

FFH..

01...

MAY

'

03...

JULY

Ov. ..

NOV.

05...

Ffb.»

04...

AP&.

11...

OIS-

SOLVtD

ZINC

(ZN!

(UG/L) ,

( 1

1971

' '

. 30 20 -.

1972

10

.

1"

'

.

1973

10 --

: 'i

' '

o...

1019

74 '

19

75

--

f)IS

-SO

LVEO

TOTAL

ALUM-

ZINC

INU1-1

(ZN)

(AL)

{UG/L)'

' (UG/LJ'

264200080390001

""'

°

--

.- 0

.

«_ '

"",.,

-.

...

II '

'

170 ,

< * '

II"

* II

'

i '.

so'1 ;

70

,,.,

50

0

20 30

'

i

SUb-

HENu

enSOLIUS

(MG/L)

r-,JS>

-Su

LVf.

liSOL I Mb

CvFbl-

DUE AT

. 1 H 0

C)(MG/L)

01 S -

SOLV

trf)

SOI. Il)

b(SUM OF

CONSTI-

TUF.

-VJT

S),

,(MC3/L)

- 43S37£2H

1 SMALLO- (LAT

--

" n .--

14

126

. 2Q

1 ]""'

"

.,14 M 0

' !

'

16

0 5 8 13 36

, --

..

.-

«

--

--

3160

325

3450

3540

3310

3360

3630

2530

2ot»0

~-

2600

2700

25HO _«

22bO _~

?4V(

>_.

1 ' 0

2f>10

2600

asfo

2B10

2750

2760

2770

DIS-

.SOLVKO

'SOLIOS

(TONb

PE»<

AC-f

-T)

26 42 00

__

-.-

..

--

..

--

-_.

...

4.30

' .44

4,69

4.ol

4.50

4.57

4.V4

TOTftt.

*OKTHO

PrlOS-

DENSITY

APhORUS

<l»M

/Ml.

(P)

AT(MG/L)

20 C)

LONG OHO 39 00.01)

_-

' --

--

--

...

'

1.003

. .00

~-»

..

".15

.02

__

_.

i

.03

' i

.08

.06

--

.06

TOTAL.

CIOITY

AS H*

(MG/L)

1.0

3.9, .o'

.4

.6

ms_

SOLV

HI)

TOTAL

AMMONIA

NITPATF

(NH4)

(N03

) (MG/L)

.00

1.3

Tabl

e 5. Analyses of

water

from

shallow monitor well cont.

TOTAL

DJ8-

SULi

/EO

TOTAL

OR(..ANIC

AMMONIA

AMMONIA

OATF

MAR.

IP...

OCT.

?0...

MAP.*

V. fc

. . .

<;d.

. .

SF P. i'b

. .

.DEC.

1^...

APS .

»IS)...

!<*.

..

JULY

0 Is

.

OCT.

Itt. ..

FFH..

0 1 ..

.MAY 03...

JULY

09...

NOV.

Ob...

FFH.,

04...

ftPR

.11...

CAH-

BONATE

(C03)

(MG/D

1971

0 0

1972

0 0 0 0

1973

0 0 0 01974

0

-

19

75

0

NITHO-

NITHO-

GEN

KEN

(N)

(N)

(MG/L)

(MG/L)

264200080390001

..

..

1.0

..

1.2

1.0

1.6

--

2.2

1.3

1.2

1.9

2.7

1.3

2.6

1.2

,.-

3.0

.90

1,4

NIIKO-

NITKO-

6fcM

C^EN

(N)

(N>

(MG/L)

(MG/L)

DIS­

SOLVED

TOT^L

NITKITF

NITrtlTF.

{ N )

( N )

(M(VL)

(MG/L)

- 43S37F28

1 SHALLOW (LAT 26 42

..

--

_.

i.o

.78

1.1 .96

--

.90

1.1

1.0

' 1.4

1.4

--

2.1

2.0

.00

.00

.0<?

..

l.v .00

.03

--

.00

.01

.02

.04

. .00

.

.02

OH

nis-

SOL.

VEU

TOTAL

NITP

ATF,

NITHATF,

(N')

(N)

(MG/L)

(MG/L)

00 LONG 080 39 00.01)

-_

..

.00

.00 --

.00

.00

.00

.00

.04

, ./.

.0^

.00

.00

..

.. .Ob

.02

TOTA

LKJtL-

DAHL

NIT^O-

fifi

N(N

)(MG/L) --

.-

--

--

_.

.- ..

..

2.6 «

3.0

3.4

TOTAL

t)IS-

SOLVFO

NITHITF

NITHITF

1PLUS

PI US

NITRATF

NITPATF

(N)

(MG/L)

(N)

(MG/L)

.00

.0**

.10

Tab

le 5.-

Analy

ses

of

wat

er

from

sh

allo

w m

onit

or

well

-cent.

OIS

U

IS

T0

T0(>

SOLV

ED

SOLVED'

' . M

AN-

. iV

llh.

..

£ _

T"Tt

1-MiJ

SSIE

N!$J

e "^

,;;-,

'«tr

sr

i" OF

CIFIC

DA

TE

«MS

,L>

(M

6/L

) ,J

'/L

) (<

^,

J^

( ^

t

WO

HC

F

-EL

L

«H

AV

,TY

a6«0008039C

100

1 -

*3S

37

EZ

* 1

SH

ALL

OW

<L

AT

26

O't

00

L0«0

0»0

39

00

.01

,

MAR.,

1971

lH...

OCT. 2U...

2u..

. MAK.,

1972

?^...

^8...

StP.

28...

DEC.

i

s...

Ib..

. APK.,

1973

**

ig

(^

i 7 .

IV...

JULY

Oe>.

..

06...

OCT.

18...

FEH.t. 1974

01...

, «AY

03...

JULY

09...

NOV.

Ob...

FEB.

, 1975

04...

APR.

11.*

..

°°

-01

20

40

65o

00

-02

10

bO

650

,.00

i

20

.04

;

20

, .0

7

_

.

""

' "

12

"~

--

r ' -»

--

14

10

.26

.

*_

1.0

I'.O l.'u

i.o

Table

5. Analyses of

water

from

shallow monitor well cont.

TOTAL

CAD­

MIUM

(CD)

OATF

(UG/L>

HEXA-

VALENT

CHHO-

MIUM

(CR6

)(U

G/L)

TOTAL

CHWU-

MIUM

(CH)

(UG/L)

264200080390001

MAW., 19

71It

?...

OCT .

"0...

MAr*., 1972

L-'H...*

1

s;*^.

OiC. Ib-.

.

0 0 0 0 0

--

--

»

DIS­

SOLV

ED

TOTAL

COPPER

COPPER

(CU)

(CU)

(UG/

L)

(UG/L)

TOTAL

IRON

(FF)

(U«/D

- 43S37E26

1 SHALLOW (LAT

0 0 o

o

0f

10

--

--

30

DIS­

SOLVED

moN

(FL)

(UG/L)

26 42

00

....

30

.

DIS­

SOLVED

LFAl)

(PH)

(UG/L)

LONG 080

0

10 0 5 t>

TOTAL

LEAD

(PH)

(U&/L)

39 00.01)

.. j; .

TOTAL

MAN­

GANESE

(MM)

(UG/

L) ..

10

'

..

DIS­

SOLVED

MANi

-GANESE

(MM)

(UG/

L) .

.. 10

.

DIS­

SOLVED

ST^ON-

TIUM

(SP)

(UP/L) ..

3<SOOO

3«000

36000

t b ..

. .1973

J'JL

V

06

...

OC

T.

1 h ,

. .F

FR

.t

1974

v) 1 ...

MAY 03,..

»v.

..N

';v.

:>b.

..

F:;H

., 19

75'!

4«..

A^R

. 1. .,

-- --

1 .

1 1 8 0 0

.-

0 0 0 0 0 1 0

lu

1

23

10

0 3

36000

33000 30

To discriminate between changes in the ground-water chemistry due

to (1) waste migration and (2) dilution and mixing of various waters,

use is made of the sulfate/chloride ratio. The chloride concentration

indicates the extent of mixing with underlying more saline waters.

According to Kaufman and McKenzie (1975), "Changes in sulfate/

chloride ratios in the monitor well fluids were evaluated and compared

with operational changes in the injection system. Emphasis was placed

on interpreting observed changes in this ratio with respect to waste

migration." That is, a decrease in the ratio suggests the arrival of

the nutrient-rich waste.

The lack of comprehensive chemical analyses of natural fluids

from several zones at the injection site prior to waste injection

places a constraint on any interpretations concerning the chemical

character of the natural water. However, water from the Experimental

Station well, about 3 miles (4.8 km) from the injection well, is con­

sidered to represent the natural subsurface background in the upper

part of the Floridan aquifer. As already stated, the chemical quality

of the water from the well has not changed significantly in more than

40 years. Water from the well has a sulfate/chloride ratio usually

greater than 510/1,600 (1:3.1) and a hydrogen sulfide concentration of

about 4.0 mg/1. ,

Changes in sulfate/chloride Ratio

According to Kaufman and others (1973) and Kaufman and McKenzie

(1975), oxidation (decomposition) of organic waste by sulfate-reducing

bacteria was taking place within the saline subsurface environment by

means of anaerobic bacterial processes in which sulfate (and perhaps COo)

45

serves as the source of oxygen. In this system, as the organic mater­

ial is oxidized, sulfate concentrations decreased also and the decrease

in sulfate is quantitatively equal to the increase in hydrogen sulfide.

Observations; 1969-73

Subtle chemical changes, indicated by slight increases in calcium

concentration and alkalinity and by a slight decrease in the sulfate/

chloride ratio (fig. 4) suggest that the waste front arrived at the

shallow monitor well in February-March 1969, about 27 months after

waste injection began. By March 1971 the sulfate/chloride ratio had

declined from 0.42 to 0.22. The slight increase in the ratio (fig. 4)

late in 1970, is correlated with a plant shutdown.

Waste injection into the deepened disposal well began in January

1972. By March 1972, the sulfate/chloride ratio in fluid from the

shallow monitor well had decreased slightly from 0.25 to 0.22. From

0.22 in March 1972 the ratio increased to 0.36 in September, then to

0.42 in December. This increase is attributed to a plant shutdown

from early August through October 1972. Waste injection resumed in

November 1972, and the sulfate/chloride ratio again decreased, from

0.42 in December 1972 to 0.27 in April 1973.

From December 1972 to July 1973, sulfate concentration and the

sulfate/chloride ratio changed considerably, apparently reflecting the

greater sensitivity of these indicators to renewed waste migration and

consequent bacterial action.

Information on this system for the first 3 years of operation

(1967-69) has been reported by Garcia-Bengochea and Vernon, 1970.

46

0---~- ---!-__

0.4~

Probable fi

rst

/2xarr

ival

of

£.

waste

front

/ i

Probable se

cond

Sa

rriv

al of

1 waste

front

o H H W Q

W 3

6 I

Wast

e injectionj'to

deepened well

/

0.2-

0.1-

'

1 EXPLANATION

,' ^

; sj

Waste

injection

in i

njection wel

l §3

Waste in

ject

ion

in deep m

onit

or w

ell

Injection

Q No

inje

ction

' ,

deeP mo

nitor

83. Hydrogen

su

lfid

e co

ncen

trat

ion,

in

mg/

1

' Injection

to

i ,,

, in

ject

ion we

ll

mr :

i%6

n?i

Figure 4.

Sulf

ate

redu

ctio

n in s

hallow monitor well

fluid, 1966-75.

(Pre 19

71 d

ata

from

Garcia-Bengochea

and

Vernon,

1970

)

Observations: 1973-75

In June 1973 the disposal well was shut down by the operators and

waste was diverted to the deep monitor well. In water from the shallow

monitor well, the sulfate/chloride ratio decreased from 0.27 in April

1973 to 0.20 in July and to 0.15 in May 1974 (fig. 4). During this time

span, hydrogen sulfide increased in concentration from 40 mg/1 to 91 mg/1.

This suggests that waste injection into the deep monitor well also resulted

in upward leakage from the injection zone to the shallow monitor well

although the site of the deep monitor well is about 1,000 ft (305 m) from

the shallow monitor, compared to only 75 ft (25 m) between the disposal

well and the shallow monitor. During April 1973-May 1974, calcium,

magnesium, sodium, and silica remained approximately unchanged in concen­

tration (table 5). However, there was a gradual but constant increase

in alkalinity. The slight increase in the sulfate/chloride ratio that

occurred from November 1973 to February 1974 may be due to a lag effect

from shifting waste injection away from the injection well or possibly to

the exceptionally low volume of waste that was injected in August and

September (fig. 3).

Waste was redirected to the disposal well in June 1974 after repairs

to the liner were completed. In July the sulf ate/chloride ratio in water

from the shallow monitor well increased substantially from the previous

value (fig. 4), reflecting, perhaps, a lag between resumption of waste

injection into the. disposal well and the arrival of waste at the shallow

monitor. The sulfate/chloride ratio decreased to 0.05 in February 1975,

an indication that leakage of waste fluid to the upper part of the Floridan

aquifer was continuing.

48

During the period of injection, July 1974 to April 1975, concentra­

tions of calcium, magnesium, sodium and silica remained constant and

pH did not change significantly. Alkalinity, on the other hand,

continued its regular increasing trend since October 1973, following the

diverting of waste from the disposal well into the deep monitor well

(808 to 1,070 mg/1). There was an attendant constant drop in non-

carbonate hardness. The COD and TOG (total organic carbon) also in­

creased slightly. Color increased from 100 to 110 units. Conductivity

increased from 4,400 to 4,700 micromhos.

Chemical-Oxygen-Demand Data and Waste Migration

Kaufman and others (1973) showed that changes in COD and pH in water

in the shallow monitor also are closely related to waste injection

schedules. COD increased and pH decreased in the water from the shallow

monitor well when the injected waste arrived at the shallow monitor.

Both a seasonal plant shutdown and, for a time, diversion of waste injec­

tion to the deep monitor well resulted in COD and pH becoming relatively

stably.in the shallow monitor. However, as illustrated by the graph of

-COJD values in figure 5, from January 1973 through December of that year,

the COD of -the fluid from the shallow monitor fluctuated widely, from

220 to 840 mg/1. By December end, waste had been injected, into

the deeper monitor well for 7 months. From December 1973 to July

1974, when waste injection into the disposal well resumed,-the COD

.concentration fluctuated less widely on a short-term: basis. ..Since

July 1974, fluctuation has, in general, not been great but the concen­

tration had, by March end 1975, increased nearly to 1,000 mg/1. On the

49

OS

CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND MILLIGRAMS PER LITRE

09

&

i i

x-x O O P*fl> gfa H«

O

,

?fo(D

O03 COrt p*co (a»-»o »-»O Q

rr O

H» D,

a> a. P. p.o ofU Prt rt n> n>(A CO

ja to(A COrt rtn> (t>

O (D O Ort rt H. H»O O

a. H» (D C3n> *-*

O H»

ft!

basis of information available to the author, the change in the

character of the fluctuations since December 1973 cannot be explained.

However, the long-term increase to 1,000 mg/1 in 1975 is interpreted

to mean that increasing quantities of the injected waste are moving

into the upper part of the Floridan aquifer.

SUMMARY AND DISCUSSION

In 1966 a furfural plant at Belle Glade, Florida, begain injecting

hot, acidic liquid waste into the saline, water-filled lower part of the

Floridan aquifer between the depths of 1,495-1,939 ft. By February-March

1969. or within a time span of about 27 months, effects of the waste in­

jection were detected in the water of the shallow monitor well, which sam­

ples the upper part of the Floridan aquifer, above the so-called "confin­

ing" layer.

In an attempt to stop the upward migration of waste, the disposal

well was deepened to 2,242 ft (683 m) during October 1971 to January

1972. During the construction, the deep monitor well was used for waste

injection. Within 15 months after waste injection into the deepened

disposal well was resumed, effects of the waste were again detected in

the shallow monitor well water.

In June 1973, the disposal well was again shut down to repair a

portion of the bottom section of the injection liner destroyed by

corrosion. Waste was again diverted to the deep monitor well. A report

by Kaufman and McKenzie (1975) documents the time span for early 1966

through July 1973*

Repairs on the deep disposal well were completed and injection was

redirected to the well in July 1974. By February 1975, effects of the

51

renewed injection into the disposal well were very significant in the

shallow monitor well, only 7 months after the resumption of injection.

Leakage into the upper part of the Floridan aquifer was continuing at a

faster rate than noted earlier.

From the information contained in the earlier report by Kaufman and

McKenzie (1975) it was evident that the receiving carbonate aquifer

could not contain the hot, acidic wastes, even when the injection well

was deepened to 2,242 ft.

This report gives information showing that remedial actions of

repairing the disposal well liner and injecting into the deep monitor

well still had no significant effect for containing wastes within the

lower part of the Floridan aquifer.

Though data indicate continued movement of the waste into the up­

per part of the Floridan aquifer, the areal extent of the zone of

contamination is still unknown. Only additional monitor wells in the

injection zone and upper part of the Floridan aquifer, upgradient and

farther downgradient, could determine how far and lateral the waste has

moved.

In a new attempt to contain the wastes, construction of a test

injection well to a depth of about 3,000 ft (914 m) was begun in

September 1975. A program to monitor the effectiveness of the new

disposal well when it becomes operational is planned.

52

SELECTED REFERENCES

Garcia-Bengochea, J. I., and Vernon, R. 0., 1970, Deep well disposal of

::--waste waters in saline aquifers of south Florida: Water Resources

Research, v. 6, no. 5, p. 1464-70.

Healy, H. G., 1962, Piezometric surface and areas of artesian flow of the

Floridan Aquifer in Florida, July 6-17, 1961: Florida Div.. of

Geology Map Ser 4.

Kaufman, M. I., 1973, Subsurface wastewater injection, Florida: Amer.

--. Soc. Civil Engineers Proc. Jour. Irrigation and Drainage Div., v. 99,

No. Rl, p. 53-70. : :-

Kaufman, M. I., Goolsby, D. A., and Faulkner, G. L., 1973, Injection of

acidic industrial waste into a saline carbonate aquifer: geochem

aspects: . in Underground Waste .Management and Artificial Recharge,

v. 1 (J. Braunstein, Ed), pp. 526-551 (Preprints, Second Internat.

Symposium, New Orleans, La., September 26-30, 1973 - AAPG).

Kaufman, M. I., and McKenzie, D. J., 1975, Upward migration of deep well

- -waste injection fluids in Floridan aquifer, South Florida, U. S.

Geol. Survey, Jour, of Research, v. 3, no. 3, p. 261-265.

Meyer, F. W., 1971, Saline artesian water as a supplement: Am. Water

, - Works Assoc. Jour., v. 63, no. 2, p. 65-71.

Parker, G. G., Ferguson, G.- E., Love,_ S. K., and others, 1955, Water

resources of southeastern Florida: U. S. Geol. Survey Water Supply

Paper 1255, 956 p.

53

Stringfield, V. T., 1933, Groundwater in the Lake Okeechobee area,

Florida: Florida Geol. Survey, Kept. Inv. 2, 31 p.

Stringfield, V. T., 1966, Artesian water in Tertiary limestone in the

southeastern United States: U. S. Geol. Survey Prof. Paper 517,

226 p.

Vernon, R. 0., 1970, The beneficial uses of zones of high transmis-

sivities in the Florida subsurface for water storage and waste

disposal: Florida Bureau of Geology Inf. Circ. 70, 39 p.