19 july 2006ken moffeit1 comparison of 2mrad and 14/20 mrad extraction lines ken moffeit (via eric...
TRANSCRIPT
19 July 2006 Ken Moffeit 1
Comparison of 2mrad and 14/20 mrad extraction lines
Ken Moffeit (via Eric Torrence)VLCW06
19 July 06
19 July 2006 Ken Moffeit 2
BDS Layout
2 mrad
14/20 mrad
19 July 2006 Ken Moffeit 3
14/20 mrad Extraction Line
250 GeV
45.59 GeV2 mrad energy
stripe
2 mradenergy stripeBVEX1E
z=46.782 m
SynchrotronRadiation Shielding
for Cerenkov Detector
z=164.25x=12.25cm
Energy Chicane Polarimeter Chicane10 cm
10 meters
Synchrotron Stripe
Detector
z=147.682x=0 y= -19.85
Cerenkov Detector
z= ~175 m
Wiggler
Low Field
25.1 GeV
BVEX2Ez=49.082 m
BLEX1z=51.382 m
BLEX2z=53.982 m
WEX1z=52.682 m
BVEX3Ez=55.282 m
BVEX4Ez=57.582 m
BVEX5Ez=59.882 m
BVEX6Ez=62.182 m
BLEX3z=64.482 m
BLEX4z=67.082 m
WEX2z=65.782 m
BVEX7Ez=68.382 m
BVEX1Ez=70.682 m
BVEX1P
z=120.682 m
BVEX2P
z=140.682 m
BVEX3P
z=152.682m
BVEX4P
z=172.682 m
Compton IP
31.2 GeV
Synchrotron Stripe
Detector z= 147.682 mx=0 y=15.3cm
VacuumChamber
VacuumChamber
Synchrotron Radiation limit toCherenkov Detector
14 cm
17.8 cmQDEX1A
z=6.0 m
QDEX1Bz=7.941 m
QFEX2Az=9.881 m
QFEX2Bz=15.5 m
QFEX2Cz=17.943 m
QFEX2Dz=20.386 m
QDEX3Az=22.829 m
QDEX3Bz=25.235 m
QDEX3Cz=27.641 m
QDEX3Dz=30.047 m
QDEX3Ez=32.453 m
QFEX4Az=34.858 m
QFEX4Bz=37.103 m
QFEX4Cz=39.348 m
QFEX4Dz=41.593 m
IP
-0.75mrad
0.75
m rad
QFEX4Ez=43.838 m
19 July 2006 Ken Moffeit 4
2 mrad Extraction LinePolarimeter Chicane
Plan View
10 m
10 cm
BHEX2
z=163.778 m
x=80.38 cm
BHEX2
z=166.077 m
x=81.63 cm
Angle2.0 mrad at IR
QEX1A
z=34.6799 m
x=14.98 cm
QEX1B
z=37.9798 m
x=16.81 cm
BHEX1
z=44.580 m
x=20.45 cm
Angle -3mrad
5 cm
-5 cm
0
Angle 3mrad
ElevationView
QEX3
z=127.678m
x=62.24 cm
QEX3
z=130.978 m
x=63.902 cm
Beam StayClear +- 7.5 cm
Photon BeamstrahlungCone
+- 0.5 mrad
Energy Chicane
Wiggler
QEX4
z=138.778 m
x=67.820 cm
-10 cm
10 cm
2 mrad extraction line
Angle 5.023 mrad
BYCHIC
z=66.179 m
x=31.351 cm
Angle3 mrad
17.8 cm
CherenkovDetector
25.1 GeV
Dispersion = 69mm250 GeV
QF1
z=15.868 m
x=0 cm
HCOLL+-7.5cm
z=61.57 mx=29.041 cm
VCOLL+-1.2cm
z=61.87 mx=29.191 cm
BYCHIC
z=68.48 m
x=32.507 cm
BYCHIC
z=70.78 m
x=33.662 cm
BYCHICM
z=89.179 m
x=42.905 cm
BYCHICM
z=91.479 m
x=44.060 cm
BYCHICM
z=93.779 m
x=45.216 cm
VCOLL2+-5cm
z=95.779 mx=46.220 cm
Dispersion = 69 cm250 GeV
VCOLL+-7.5cm
z=153.578 mx=75.254 cm
ECOLL0+-7.5 cm
z=240.276 mx=129.471 cm
HCOLL2+-5 cm
z=118.479 mx=57.623 cm
BYCHIC
z=119.079 m
x=57.924 cm
BYCHIC
z=121.379 m
x=59.080 cm
BYCHIC
z=123.679 m
x=60.235 cm
QEX4
z=142.078 m
x=69.478 cm
QEX4
z=145.378 m
x=71.135 cm
QEX4
z=148.678 m
x=72.793 cm
QEX5
z=159.778 m
x=78.369 cm
QEX5
z=156.478 m
x=76.711 cm
Angle 5.740 mrad
Angle 6.458 mrad
BYCHICM
z=96.079 m
x=46.371 cm
BYCHICM
z=98.379 m
x=47.526 cm
BYCHICM
z=100.679 m
x=48.681 cm
BYENE
z=169.078 m
x=83.492 cm
BYENE
z=171.378 m
x=84.977 cm
BYENE
z=173.678 m
x=86.463 cmBYENEM
z=192.077 m
x=98.345 cm
BYENEM
z=194.377 m
x=99.830 cm
BYENEM
z=196.677 m
x=101.315cm
BYENEM
z=198.977 m
x=102.801cm
BYENEM
z=201.277 m
x=104.286cm
BYENEM
z=203.577 m
x=105.771cm
Angle-3 mrad
Wiggler
BYENE
z=221.977 m
x=117.653cm
BYENE
z=224.277 m
x=119.138cm
BYENE
z=226.577 m
x=120.624cm
Wiggler
BHEX3
z=240.876 m
x=129.858cm
BHEX3
z=243.176 m
x=131.199cm
BHEX3
z=245.476 m
x=132.283cm
BHEX3
z=247.776 m
x=133.110cm
ECOLL0
+-7.5 cm
z=240.276 m
x=129.471
cm
Photon BeamstrahlungCone
+- 0.5 mrad
BYPOL
z=250.776 m
x=133.822cm
BYPOL
z=253.076m
x=134.282cm
BYPOLM
z=260.776 m
x=135.822cm
BYPOLM
z=263.076m
x=136.282cm
BYPOLM
z=273.076 m
x=138.282cm
BYPOLM
z=275.376m
x=138.742cm
BYPOL
z=283.076 m
x=140.282cm
BYPOL
z=285.376m
x=140.742cm
12.3 cm
35 GeV
Angle2.0 mrad
Compton IPz=269.076mx=137.482cm
BHEX4
z=289.376 m
x=141.542cm
Dispersion = 20 mm250 GeV
ComptonIP
Shielding
QD0
z=4.5 m
x=0 cm
SD0
z=8.19 m
x=0 cm
SF1
z=18.38 m
x=0 cm
Angle 5.523 mrad
3.68 mrad5.0 mrad
3.54 mrad
Synchrotron Stripe Detectorz=269.076 my= -28.7 cm
Synchrotron Stripe Detectorz=269.076 my= 12.7 cm
Angle-2 mrad
Angle2 mrad
Synchrotron StripeDetectors
19 July 2006 Ken Moffeit 5
19 July 2006 Ken Moffeit 6
The extraction line transport is simulated using the program GEANT.
Disrupted beam events were taken from files prepared by Andrei Seryi.
For these studies files: cs11 corresponds to a normal ILC beam (mean energy 244.3 GeV and RMS 10.84 GeV)
cs13 with parameters set for large-y (mean energy 243.1 GeV and RMS 11.14 GeV).
cs13 dy = 4nm gives large-y parameter data sets with the centroid of the beams missing by 4nm in the vertical (mean energy 242.2 GeV and RMS 12.05 GeV)
cs13 dx =200nm has beams missing by 200nm in the horizontal (mean energy 243.3 GeV and RMS 10.94 GeV)
19 July 2006 Ken Moffeit 7
19 July 2006 Ken Moffeit 8
19 July 2006 Ken Moffeit 9
19 July 2006 Ken Moffeit 10
Spin Precession
bendbendspin
GeVEg θθγθ ⋅=⋅−
=44065.0
)(2
2
Change in spin direction for various bend angles and the projection of the longitudinal polarization. Electron beam energy is 250 GeV.
Change in Bend Angle Change in Spin Direction at 250 GeV
Longitudinal Polarization Projection
1 mrad 32.5 o 84.3%
275 rad 8.9 o 98.8%
100 rad 3.25 o =56mrad 99.8%
19 July 2006 Ken Moffeit 11
19 July 2006 Ken Moffeit 12
2mrad x vs y
+/-100 m
19 July 2006 Ken Moffeit 13
2mrad Extraction Line: Beam accepted and polarization projection for various +- 100 micron selections about the x value
of the beam at the Compton IP. In each case abs(y+2.0cm)<100 microns and abs(x-137.45).
x +- 100 microns
%Beam within +-100microns in x & y
Polarization Projection
137.45 14.7 99.83
137.47 6.0 99.89
137.49 4.8 99.94
137.51 3.8 99.94
19 July 2006 Ken Moffeit 14
20mrad Extraction Line with 2.019<y<-1.999cm and abs(x)<0.01cm
Condition (file name) %Beam within +-100microns in x & y
Polarization Projection
Nominal Beam Condition (cs11) 48.3 99.85
Large y (cs13) 36.7 99.76
Large y horizontal offset 200nm (cs13_dx200)
37.2 99.75
Large y vertical offset 4nm (cs13_dy4)
32.8 99.75
2 mrad Extraction Line with abs(y+2)<0.01cm and abs(x-137.45)<0.01cm
Condition (file name) %Beam within +-100microns in x & y
Polarization Projection
Nominal Beam Condition (cs11) 14.7 99.83
Large y (cs13) 7.6 99.83
Large y horizontal offset 200nm (cs13_dx200)
8.9 99.82
Large y vertical offset 4nm (cs13_dy4)
6.0 99.83
19 July 2006 Ken Moffeit 15
Beam Losses from the e+e- IR to the Compton Detector Plane
Condition (file name) Losses Beam Lost Beam
Nominal Beam Condition (cs11) 0 34883 <0.5 * 10-4
Large y (cs13) 0 30000 <0.6 * 10-4
Large y horizontal offset 200nm (cs13_dx200) 0 30000 <0.6 * 10-4
Large y vertical offset 4nm (cs13_dy4) 0 30000 <0.6 * 10-4
2 mrad Crossing Angle Extraction Line
Condition (file name) Losses Beam Lost Beam
Nominal Beam Condition (cs11) 4 30000 1.3 * 10-4
Large y (cs13) 9 30000 3 * 10-4
Large y horizontal offset 200nm (cs13_dx200) 7 30000 2.3 * 10-4
Large y vertical offset 4nm (cs13_dy4) 18 30000 6 * 10-4
20 mrad Crossing Angle Extraction Line
19 July 2006 Ken Moffeit 16
Beam losses were further studied by using a file with the tails of the disrupted beam having events with energy less than 0.65 of the beam energy or the angle greater than
0.5 mrad:
http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~seryi/ILC_new_gp_files/cs11_hs/tail1_lt_0_65E0_or_gt_500urad.dat
e+e- Interaction Point
Energy (GeV)X angle (milliradians)
y angle (milliradians)
0
0.2
-0.2
-0.5 0.50 100 160120 140
Beam Losses
19 July 2006 Ken Moffeit 17
Only 5899 of the 10,503 particles continue to the Compton Detector plane. This represents a loss of 2.62*10-4 of the 17.59 million original beam tracks.
2mrad extraction line
Estimate ~50 photons/cm2 are in the region of the Cherenkov counter cells for each bunch of 2*1010 electrons
Only ~20% above 10 MeV
Can reduce by local shielding of Cherenkov Detector
Compton Signal ~650 backscattered electrons per GeV or >1000 per 1cm cell
19 July 2006 Ken Moffeit 18
Synchrotron Radiation
19 July 2006 Ken Moffeit 19
Table IV: Energy Loss from Synchrotron Radiation between the e+e- IR and the Center of the Energy Chicane.
a) 20 mrad Crossing Angle Extraction Line
Condition (file name) Energy Loss (MeV)
Nominal Beam Condition (cs11) 119.4
Large y (cs13) 123.0
Large y horizontal offset 200nm (cs13_dx200) 122.7
Large y vertical offset 4nm (cs13_dy4) 124.3
b) 2 mrad Crossing Angle Extraction Line
Condition (file name) Energy Loss (MeV)
Nominal Beam Condition (cs11) 854.2
Large y (cs13) 854.2
Large y horizontal offset 200nm (cs13_dx200) 828.5
Large y vertical offset 4nm (cs13_dy4) 859.4
19 July 2006 Ken Moffeit 20
19 July 2006 Ken Moffeit 21
19 July 2006 Ken Moffeit 22
The 20 mrad extraction line has:
•Core of beam within +-100microns has between 32 and 48% of the beam.
•The polarization projection is 99.75 to 99.85% at the Compton IP.
•No beam losses from e+e- IR to Compton detector plane out of 17.6 million beam tracks.
•Beam energy loss due to synchrotron radiation to the middle of energy chicane (z=59.7 m) is only ~110 MeV and does not show variation with beam conditions.
•The collimator at z=164.25 meters needs to be designed. It absorbs the synchrotron radiation above the 0.75 mrad beam stay clear allowing the Cherenkov detector to begin at y~14 cm.
Conclusions
19 July 2006 Ken Moffeit 23
•There are large beam losses between e+e- IR and Compton detector plane (>2.6*10-4 are lost) giving secondary backgrounds of mainly photons in the region of the Cherenkov Detector.
•A small percentage of beam is hit by laser spot +-100 microns (~15%) at the Compton IP and results in low Compton luminosity.
•There are large beam energy losses (~850 MeV) due to synchrotron radiation between IR and the center of the energy chicane at z=198.82 meters.
•Synchrotron radiation at Cherenkov Detector is favorable. The detector only sees the synchrotron radiation from the magnets of the polarimeter chicane, and this is contained between -9 and +2 cm. The first cell of the Cherenkov Detector starts at +10 cm.
The 2 mrad extraction line has: