17irvina - inclusive design

17
1 Inclusive Design /// Criteria B Higher Level Design Technology Irvin Acosta Year 12

Upload: irvin-acosta

Post on 14-Apr-2017

14 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 17irvinA - Inclusive Design

1

Inclusive Design

/// Criteria B

Higher Level Design Technology

Irvin Acosta Year 12

Page 2: 17irvinA - Inclusive Design

2

Task A1 Design Need

Problem A common everyday task everyone faces involves securing doors, chests, and closets using conventional pin and tumbler locks, the most common locks used in households. However, this simple but crucial task may pose significant difficulty to people with arthritis due to the current design of the keys in the market. Avoiding these tasks to avoid pain can compromise their security. A common way of organizing keys is by grouping them with a keychain. Finding the correct key requires extra movement and more potential pain. The task of inserting, then turning the key to unlock a pin and tumbler lock requires hand movements which cause pain, with varying pain levels depending on severity of the condition. This task can be broken down into these hand motions (listed in chronological order):

1. Pinch (To grip the key) 2. Push (Inserting key into keyhole) 3. Twist (To rotate the key in the tumbler in order to unlock) 4. Pull (To remove key from the keyhole)

Usually, people will often have multiple keys held by one keychain. Finding the right key will often require fine finger movements. Because of arthritic peoples’ limited finger dexterity, the task of organizing keys can be time consuming and painful. The listed actions put pressure in sensitive joint areas and cause pain. People with arthritis have limited finger motion range. This causes restricted joint movement, and ultimately, usability of many general consumer products. The product that will solve the issue of operating and organizing keys will be an extension of the keys that the market is currently using.

Page 3: 17irvinA - Inclusive Design

3

Task A5 Product design specifications

Specification Justification Must take less than 5 steps to operate device

Low memory burden leads to ease of use and customer loyalty

Device must not require the user to move fingers joints at painful angles

Small objects require the user to grasp tightly in order to grip it, which in turn would cause pain

Most sizes of keys must fit in the device

In order to accommodate a larger market, all sizes and dimensions of conventional house keys must fit in the device

Must use minimalist design The choice of using minimalist design can be used as a marketing tactic to make the product seem less “intimidating” and improve its marketability among the older segment of the potential target market.

The product must eliminate need to pinch to grip the key securely

Pinching movements usually add strain to sensitive joints. In some cases, pinching may not be possible due to restricted joint movement.

The product must reduce the use of wrist in turning the key when locking and unlocking the door.

Turning the key while the user is pinching the key adds additional strain to sensitive wrist joints. Pain must be minimized

Must be easily portable and fit small bags

The device will be brought around and used daily

Device must be fully disassembled with common tools

This will help speed up the salvaging / recycling process

Must be durable and withstand repetitive use and strain

Item will be used often (strengthening ribs)

Must be ergonomic for majority of users

To maximize the marketability of product, the aid must be comfortable to use for majority of the users. Anthropometric data falling in the 50th percentile should be used to

Must hold more than 4 keys To maximize user’s product use, it must accommodate more than 4 keys

Must allow user to choose from multiple keys easily

Rifling through multiple keys requires potentially painful finger movements. The aid / solution must reduce fine finger movements required to choose appropriate key

Product must not contain sharp edges

Sharp edges can cause scratches, discomfort to user

Page 4: 17irvinA - Inclusive Design

4

8 Initial Designs Idea #1

Idea #2

Idea #3

Idea #4

Function: - Ergonomic grip w/ rubber handles

eliminates need to pinch keys to when handling

- Rounded shape and larger contact surface area minimizes need to curl fingers in painful angles

-

Function - Lever action translates painful pinch

and turning motion into painless push down motion

- Rubber handles allow for more secure grip

Function - User twists product to choose key, then pushes “plunger” to extend chosen key to enter lock. - Reduces finger dexterity required to choose between 7 keys: Simplifies process into one twisting action

Function - User pushes the ejector to swivel one of 6 keys out – Simplifies key organization through decreasing amount of steps needed - Circle in middle allows user to grip item securely and help act as a lever, decreasing pain when unlocking door

Page 5: 17irvinA - Inclusive Design

5

Idea #5

Idea #6

Idea #7

Idea #8

Function -User slides one of 3 keys out, and retracts when not in use to improve portability -First layer slides out to increase surface area and improve grip -Card acts as a lever to ease key turning movement and minimize pain

Function -6 keys are fixed in a chain formation and eject out of the slot when needed; simplifying use -Long body acts as lever -Streamlined shape improves portability; fitting into bags more easily

Function -Four keys are installed in the slots. Key ejects if corresponding button is pressed, and retracts when not in use -Keys are retractable to make product’s form more streamlined and more portable

Function -Five keys swivel out to be perpendicular to body, and act as lever when turning key - -Pentagon shape allows user to place each finger on edge comfortably and divide turning force to whole hand, decreasing pain

Page 6: 17irvinA - Inclusive Design

6

Task B1b Development of Solution

Improvements Based on Feedback

Issue Turning might be difficult due to the product’s smooth, cylindrical shape. This is multiplied by the users’ inability to squeeze to grip the item when twisting it Suggested Solution Turning the front part can hurt because of need to squeeze - lever eliminates need to squeeze when rotating key. The lever effectively translates rotational motion into a more comfortable, pushdown motion, which instead uses the whole arm, instead of flexing sensitive finger joints. The lever however, must be foldable to minimize used storage space when not in use

Issue Sliding out the keys using a pinching finger gesture can hurt due to the arthritic user’s inability to flex fingers. Solution: Foldable Lever in the place of ejectors can eliminate need to squeeze when pulling out key ejectors Curved edges can help place fingers better around form; decreasing need to squeeze (which causes pain) to have a sturdier and tighter grip.

Issue Sliding out grip might be an issue because of need to make pinching motion with fingers. Issue applies for the key ejectors -Slide-out grip is not ergonomic: sharp edge adds pressure in small area of palm, causing discomfort Suggested solution: Foldable attachment lever to grip and sliders could be made to eliminate painful pinching hand movements. The lever must sit flush with the item so that the requirement of a low storage space is met. Larger fillet radius in thumb edge allows thumb to conform to card shape more comfortably

Page 7: 17irvinA - Inclusive Design

7

Design 1 Revised

Additional research: In order for the card to fit the hand comfortably and snugly, I needed to research appropriate anthropometric data. I needed to research average finger widths in order for the majority of the users’ fingers to fit the curved, indented edges properly. The circumference of the arcs intended to hold the fingers must be equal to the average finger widths. If the arcs are too large, the grip would become lose and if the arc circumference is too small, the fingers would not fit and would be harder to grip. The purpose of using the appropriate measurements for the indented finger arcs is to increase the surface area in which the fingers make contact with the card, which improves grip stability. Averages are used in order for the product to conform to majority of users’ hands comfortably; improving marketability and user experience The average thumb length determines the pull out handle’s fillet radius. The appropriate curve allows the users’ hands to conform comfortably to the shape of the card grip area. Anthropometric Data Used (Bodyspace 3rd edition) Dimension (mm) Men (50th Percentile) Women (50th Percentile) Average Finger Breadth 22 18 20 Thumb Length 51 47 49

Ergonomics Evaluation

Positives: -Fits my hand well because the sliding grip adjusts specifically for my hand’s length -Filleted corner allows thumb to rest comfortably Areas of Improvement: - Arc only accommodates fingertips, base of fingers is too large for the arc – this must be enlarged to fit comfortably - Fairly sharp corner can cause discomfort on palm if held for extended periods of time – This can be filleted to a larger radius to disperse force put on palm to a larger surface area and reduce pain

Page 8: 17irvinA - Inclusive Design

8

Design 2 Revised

Evenly spaced indented arcs around circumference allow area between thumb and index finger to sit securely regardless of hand’s grip and positioning.

Folding and rotating lever allows user to eject key without needing to pinch button in previous design, which can cause pain due to the sharp angles that the finger joints need to do. User can use their palm or fingertip to push lever without making painful hand gestures

The hinge joints allow the lever to sit flush to the product’s form when not in use; allowing the product to be stored in small, tight spaces. Revolute joint allows lever to change direction, based on whether ejector is being pushed in or out

Ergonomics Evaluation

Areas of Improvement: -Although the thumb sits comfortably on Design 2’s curvature, the item forces the pinky and index finger to split, which can cause pain, especially when the user tries to squeeze the object to increase grip.

- This can be addressed by decreasing the diameter of the object based on the size in which the 50th percentile of users can grip the object without causing pain

- An arc can be placed here to allow pinky to rest and eliminate need to curve pinky finger, which can cause pain in arthritic hands

Page 9: 17irvinA - Inclusive Design

9

Design 3 Revised

Lever swivels out via a hinge joint. User can press down on lever, which converts vertical movement into rotational motion, which unlocks the door lock once the key is extended.

After the handle is used, and is no longer needed, the handle can fold to fit flush with the product’s form, minimizing storage space use and maximizing portability

User’s four fingers can fit inside the arc. User does not need to flex finger joints, and instead keep it at a flat, comfortable position to push down lever, that does not cause pain

Ergonomics Evaluation

Areas of Improvement: -The circumference of area is too large for my hand, which causes my hand to shift downwards in a more comfortable and secure grip. The shift in position however, causes my palm and wrist to interfere with the sliding cylinder and the ejection of the key This issue can be addressed by reducing the circumference of the upper area and prevent user from shifting their grip lower to the point where it interferes with the sliding cylindrical joint. -When gripping the object tightly, my hand had a tendency to slide down because of the object’s inclined form. -This can be addressed by modifying the form so that both opposing edges are parallel, preventing shift. A cylindrical form ensures a more secure grip -Adding a textured or rubberized grip can also secure grip and prevent shifting of hand

Page 10: 17irvinA - Inclusive Design

10

Task B1c Appraisal of solutions against specification requirements Specification Design 1 Design 2 Design 3 1) Function 1) Must take less

than 5 steps to operate device

4/5 Needed 6 steps to operate device

5/5 3/5 Takes 3 steps to operate device

2) Device must not require the user to move fingers joints at painful angles

3/5 Due to small size, fingers may need to bend more

4/5 5/5 Ergonomic body contours to hand shape

3) Most sizes of keys must fit in the device

5/5 Clamp mechanism allows keys of varying thicknesses to fit

2/5 Size of peg holding the key is fixed. Smaller and larger keys may not fit

4/5 Irregularly shaped keys will not fit, but most should

4) The product must eliminate need to pinch in order to grip key securely

5/5 5/5 5/5 Product fits will in hand without

5) The product must reduce the effort required to turn the key

2/5 Although grip is improved, product still needs to be turned via rotation of wrist

2/5 5/5 The “effort” arm is longer, meaning less effort is required to offset load

6) Must allow user to choose from multiple keys easily

4/5 Requires 3 steps to extend key

4/5 Simplifies process into pushing ejector to extend keys

5/5 Process is simplified by reducing into 1 type of motion

7) Must hold more than 4 keys

3/5 Can only fit 3 keys, but compensated by its small size

5/5 Holds 6 keys

5/5 Product can hold 2 more keys

above minimum requirement

8) Must be ergonomic for majority of users

4/5 Slide out grip length can be variable, fitting a wide range of hand lengths

5/5 Aid can be gripped differently but securely based on hand size

5/5 Product can accommodate most sizes of hands

2) Aesthetics 1) Must use minimalist design

5/5 3/5 5/5 Few, simple lines and curves only utilized in design

3) Size 1) Must be easily portable and fit small bags

5/5 Fits in wallet, based on credit card size and dimensions

3/5 3/5

4) Environment

1) Device must be fully disassembled with basic tools

2/5 Uni-body construction means parts are not easily salvageable due to difficult access

3/5 4/5

5) Performance

1) Must be durable and withstand repetitive use and strain

3/5 Small hinges may wear down after repetitive use

3/5 4/5

6) Safety 1) Must not contain sharp edges

3/5 3/5 4/5

TOTAL 48 / 65 47 / 65 59 / 65

Page 11: 17irvinA - Inclusive Design

11

Chosen Design Justification Although design 3 may be less portable due to its irregular shape, it compensates for its superior ergonomics, simplified user interaction and low memory burden. Tactile and auditory feedback could be utilized through incremental clicks that notify user that chosen key is aligned and ready to be extended. These various features simplify user interaction and is more appropriate for the older age range where cognition, memory and physical ability is limited. Design 3 is also the only design that reduces wrist movement required to unlock door. A point in which design 3 excels at is the number of steps required to operate product. The spring loaded cylinder joint halves the required steps because retracting the moving parts after use has been automated. Since it requires the lowest amount of steps to operate the product, it also has the lowest memory burden. A low memory burden improves the user experience by simplifying user interaction. Design 3 overall, is the simplest in terms of user interaction. It effectively solves the issue of managing keys by simplifying the process through translating otherwise uncomfortable hand movements into more manageable pushing and turning motions.

Page 12: 17irvinA - Inclusive Design

12

Task B2a Development of Design Part #1 – Main Body Function: To house internal parts and serve as an ergonomic body for user to handle

1st Iteration Improvements 1) Window A has been added, allowing user to easily access and rotate key cartridge 2) Window B has been added to give user a visual indicator when the key slot has aligned with the key pusher / plunger (client issue 1) 3) The main body consists of two separate parts for easier accessibility (Spec 4.1) and assembly. Addresses client issue of fixing jams (client issue 2)

2nd Iteration Improvements 1) Part A has been filleted to prevent sharp edge from scratching user when user’s finger slides to rotate cartridge and meet specification 7.1 2) Window A has been duplicated in opposite side. This helps disperse pressure required to more than one finger, decreasing pain (Spec 1.2) 3) Window A is enlarged to improve ergonomics and fit larger fingers (Spec 1.8) (client issue 3)

A

B

Client Interview Main Points: 1) Hard to tell if key is aligned with ejector 2) Product could jam due to moving parts 3) Part A could be hard to access due to small size

Page 13: 17irvinA - Inclusive Design

13

Part #2 – Key Pusher Function: Part allows user to eject the selected key from the cartridge (Part #3) via a pushing motion

1st Iteration Improvements 1) Part A has been removed to ensure that the plunger can be disassembled from the upper body

A

2nd Iteration Improvements 1) Part B is hollowed out to reduce plastic use 2) Part C is enlarged to prevent part from wearing out and potentially breaking (Spec 5.1) 3) Part D has been changed into a circle to streamline the form and improve portability (Spec 3.1), solving client issue #1

B

C

D

Client Interview Main Points: 1) Potential issue with portability due to sharp angled edges (edges could snag with cloth)

Page 14: 17irvinA - Inclusive Design

14

Part #3 – Key Cartridge Function: Cartridge houses each key while pivoting on one point to allow user to rotate to choose key to eject

1st Iteration Improvements 1) Part A has added to ensure that the user grips the cylinder securely with minimal effort and pain (Spec 1.2) (client issue 1)

2nd Iteration Improvements 1) Part B has been added to allow user to label corresponding key with a marker. Part B can be seen through the main body to indicate that desired key has been aligned with key ejector. (Spec 1.6)

A B

Client Interview Main Points: 1) Smooth plastic surface might be slippery, when oils from fingers accumulate

Page 15: 17irvinA - Inclusive Design

15

Task B2b Validation of Design Proposal Specification Evaluation 1) Function 1) Must take less than

5 steps to operate device

The product only requires 3 actions to operate it: Rotate Cylinder, Push and Eject Key, Twist to unlock. Adding the spring to push the plunger in its neutral position cut down an action since it has become automated by the spring. The product is effective because it does not consume lots of time to operate

2) Device must not require the user to move fingers joints at painful angles

The cylindrical form of the product fits naturally because of the inherent shape of users’ hands. The narrower top of the body allows the shorter fingers (pinky and ring finger) to conform to the product’s shape. The product allows users’ hands to conform naturally to the product’s shape, minimizing potential discomfort when gripping the product

3) Most sizes of keys must fit in the device

The slots in the cartridge can accommodate most keys in the market. The slot size is based on the largest keys’ dimensions. Assuming that the sample of keys used in the measurement of the slots, reflect the dimensions of keys in the market, the cartridge should accommodate majority of keys

4) The product must eliminate need to pinch in order to grip key securely

The enlarged gripping surface area of the product completely eliminated the need to make any painful pinching actions

5) The product must reduce the effort required to turn the key

The off-center key ejection slot uses the body as a lever to decrease effort required to turn the key. Although a folding handle cannot be incorporated into the design (due to space limitations), the body can still be effectively used as a turning lever (with the key being the fulcrum)

6) Must allow user to choose from multiple keys easily

The rotating key cartridge gives the user the freedom to choose the key they want to use by aligning it with the ejector. Allowing user to label the key slots decreases the memory burden. This saves time and effort when choosing from multiple keys

7) Must hold more than 4 keys

Due to the cartridge’s large circumference, 6 key slots can be fitted in array. This is above the minimum required held keys

8) Must be ergonomic for majority of users

In theory, the product should fit most users because anthropometric hand data from the 50th percentile has been used. This is the maximum potential users that the product meets

2) Aesthetics 1) Must use minimalist design

The design style utilized in the product is not completely minimalistic due to the multiple curves and other ornamentations used to improve ergonomics and function. This specification has been met partially

3) Size 1) Must be easily portable and fit small bags

Due to the product’s regular shape and filleted edges, the product should be easily fit into bags. A hole for a lanyard has been added to give the user the option to hang the product in the event that it does not fit the user’s bag.

4) Environment

1) Device must be fully disassembled with basic tools

The device does not use glue, which means that no tools are needed to disassemble the product, improving recyclability. The product exceeds this specification requirement

5) Performance

1) Must be durable and withstand repetitive use and strain

Moving parts have been improved by enlarging them to prevent any cracks in the product’s weak points. This improvement should improve the durability of the product and lengthen its life

6) Safety 1) Must not contain sharp edges

All of the edges in the product has been filleted significantly which eliminated all sharp edges and potential to injure or cause discomfort to the user. The product meets the specification as required

Page 16: 17irvinA - Inclusive Design

16

Task B2C Design Proposal

*ABS Plastic (injection molded) used in all components except spring

Lap Joints (4x) and glue

Slide Joint, Lubricated to reduce friction

Steel

Page 17: 17irvinA - Inclusive Design

17