177284156 fundamental principals foundation design

49
1 Fundamental Principles of Foundation Design Anthony M. DiGioia Jr., PhD, PE, President DiGioia, Gray and Associates, LLC IEEE TP&C Subcommittee Meeting Orlando, Florida January 8 – 11, 2007

Upload: ahmed-taha

Post on 27-Dec-2015

17 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 177284156 Fundamental Principals Foundation Design

1

Fundamental Principles of Foundation Design

Anthony M. DiGioia Jr., PhD, PE, PresidentDiGioia, Gray and Associates, LLC

IEEE TP&C Subcommittee Meeting

Orlando, Florida

January 8 – 11, 2007

Page 2: 177284156 Fundamental Principals Foundation Design

2

Foundation Design Requires a Blending of

Soil/Foundation Interaction Modelingand

Engineering Judgment

Page 3: 177284156 Fundamental Principals Foundation Design

3

Foundation Design Process

INPUT DATA

FOUNDATION DESIGN

CONTRACT DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS

CONSTRUCTION MONITORING

AND AS-BUILT INFORMATION

Page 4: 177284156 Fundamental Principals Foundation Design

4

SUBSURFACE

INVESTIGATION

Input Data

Page 5: 177284156 Fundamental Principals Foundation Design

5

PAST SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATIONS

GEOLOGY STUDY

SUBSURFACE

INVESTIGATION

Input Data

Page 6: 177284156 Fundamental Principals Foundation Design

6

SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION

Input DataGEOLOGY

STUDYPAST SUBSURFACE

INVESTIGATIONS

STRUCTURE TYPES(Lattice Towers, Poles, H-Frames, Etc.)

AND ROLE(Tangent, Runing Angle, Dead End, Etc.)

Page 7: 177284156 Fundamental Principals Foundation Design

7

SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION

Input DataGEOLOGY

STUDYPAST SUBSURFACE

INVESTIGATIONS

STRUCTURE TYPES(Lattice Towers, Poles, H-Frames, Etc.)

AND ROLE(Tangent, Runing Angle, Dead End, Etc.)

MODE OF FOUNDATION LOADS(Moment, Horizontal, Uplift, Compression

and Combinations)

Page 8: 177284156 Fundamental Principals Foundation Design

8

Input Data

SINGLE POLE STRUCTURES

Page 9: 177284156 Fundamental Principals Foundation Design

9

Input Data

LATTICE TOWER (FOUR-LEGGED) STRUCTURES

Page 10: 177284156 Fundamental Principals Foundation Design

10

Input Data

H-FRAME STRUCTURES

Page 11: 177284156 Fundamental Principals Foundation Design

11

SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION

Input DataGEOLOGY

STUDYPAST SUBSURFACE

INVESTIGATIONS

STRUCTURE TYPES(Lattice Towers, Poles, H-Frames, Etc.)

AND ROLE(Tangent, Runing Angle, Dead End, Etc.)

MODE OF FOUNDATION LOADS

(Moment, Horizontal, Uplift, Compression and Combinations)

NUMBER, TYPE AND LOCATION

OF BORINGS

Page 12: 177284156 Fundamental Principals Foundation Design

12

SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION

Input DataGEOLOGY

STUDYPAST SUBSURFACE

INVESTIGATIONS

STRUCTURE TYPES(Lattice Towers, Poles, H-Frames, Etc.)

AND ROLE(Tangent, Runing Angle, Dead End, Etc.)

MODE OF FOUNDATION LOADS

(Moment, Horizontal, Uplift, Compression and Combinations)

NUMBER, TYPE AND LOCATION

OF BORINGS

LINE DESIGN CRITERIA

Line Reliability Issues Component Reliability

Issues

Page 13: 177284156 Fundamental Principals Foundation Design

13

SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION

Input DataGEOLOGY

STUDYPAST SUBSURFACE

INVESTIGATIONS

STRUCTURE TYPES(Lattice Towers, Poles, H-Frames, Etc.)

AND ROLE(Tangent, Runing Angle, Dead End, Etc.)

MODE OF FOUNDATION LOADS

(Moment, Horizontal, Uplift, Compression and Combinations)

NUMBER, TYPE AND LOCATION

OF BORINGS

LINE DESIGN CRITERIA

Line Reliability Issues Component Reliability

Issues

Page 14: 177284156 Fundamental Principals Foundation Design

14

PI1

PI3 PI2

PI4

PI5

How should you approach obtaining subsurface information and geotechnical design parameters?

• SOIL TYPES

• ROCK TYPES

• DEPTH TO GROUND WATER

• DEPTH TO ROCK

GEOTECHNICAL ISSUES

Page 15: 177284156 Fundamental Principals Foundation Design

15

PI1

PI3 PI2

PI4

PI5

How should you approach obtaining subsurface information and geotechnical design parameters?

• STRUCTURE TYPES

• STRUCTURE ROLES

• PERFORMANCE CRITERIA

• RELIABILITY LEVEL

STRUCTURE ISSUES

Page 16: 177284156 Fundamental Principals Foundation Design

16

Ws Ws

GWL

U

H Wc

β

• What geotechnical data do we need?- All cohesive soil- All cohesionless soil- Layered soil conditions

• Free-Standing Lattice Tower; Concrete Spread Footings;Frustrum Design Method

Page 17: 177284156 Fundamental Principals Foundation Design

17

Ws Ws

GWL

U

H Wc

τ τ

• What geotechnical data do we need?- All cohesive soil- All cohesionless soil- Layered soil conditions

• Free-Standing Lattice Tower; Concrete Spread Footings;Side Friction Design Method

Page 18: 177284156 Fundamental Principals Foundation Design

18

H

GWL

U

Wcττ

• What geotechnical data do we need?- All cohesive soil- All cohesionless soil- Layered soil conditions

• Free-Standing Lattice Tower; Drilled Shaft;Cylindrical Shear Design Method

Page 19: 177284156 Fundamental Principals Foundation Design

19

• What geotechnical data do we need?- All cohesive soil- All cohesionless soil- Layered soil conditions

• Tubular Steel Pole; Drilled Shaft;Hansen Design Method

Page 20: 177284156 Fundamental Principals Foundation Design

20

Foundation Design Process

INPUT DATA

FOUNDATION DESIGN

CONTRACT DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS

CONSTRUCTION MONITORING

AND AS-BUILT INFORMATION

Page 21: 177284156 Fundamental Principals Foundation Design

21

Foundation Design Process

INPUT DATA

FOUNDATION DESIGN

CONTRACT DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS

CONSTRUCTION MONITORING

AND AS-BUILT INFORMATION

ASCE MANUAL 74 RBD METHOD

Page 22: 177284156 Fundamental Principals Foundation Design

22

• Consider the variability of loadings.• Consider the variability of component

strength.• Vary reliability levels between lines.• Vary reliability levels between line

components.

The ASCE Method allows the designer to:

ASCE Manual 74 Reliability-Based Design (RBD) Method

Page 23: 177284156 Fundamental Principals Foundation Design

23

The Load Resistance Factor Design (LRFD) equation presented in Section 1 of Manual 74 for weather-related (reliability based) loads is as follows:

ΦCRe > effect of [DL + γ Q50] (1)

in which:

ΦC = strength (resistance) factor which can be selected to adjust the reliability of the component;

Re = the e-th % design strength for the component;DL = dead load effect in the component;γ = load factor applied to the live load effect Q50;

Q50 = load effect produced by combinations of wind velocity, ice thickness, and/or temperature, which has a 50-year return period

Page 24: 177284156 Fundamental Principals Foundation Design

24

Load Factors to Adjust Line Reliabilityby Factor LRF

40020010050Load Return Period - RP (years)

1.41.31.151.0Load Factor, γ

8421Line Reliability Factor (LRF)

Page 25: 177284156 Fundamental Principals Foundation Design

25

Strength Factors to AdjustComponent Reliability by Factor CRF forStrength Exclusion Limit, e of 5 to 10%

0.750.901.11CRF, ΦC, for COVR = 50%0.770.881.09CRF, ΦC, for COVR = 40%0.760.871.05CRF, ΦC, for COVR = 30%0.730.851.00CRF, ΦC, for COVR = 10-20%

421Component Reliability Factor

(CRF)

NOTE: COVR = Coefficient of Variation of Resistance

Page 26: 177284156 Fundamental Principals Foundation Design

26

Foundation Design Process

INPUT DATA

FOUNDATION DESIGN

CONTRACT DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS

CONSTRUCTION MONITORING

AND AS-BUILT INFORMATION

ASCE MANUAL 74 RBD METHOD

FOUNDATION DESIGN MODEL SELECTION & CALIBRATION

Page 27: 177284156 Fundamental Principals Foundation Design

27

Hansen Design Model

Page 28: 177284156 Fundamental Principals Foundation Design

28

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000

Predicted Nominal Strength - X (kip-ft)

Test

Str

engt

h - Y

(kip

-ft)

Constant COVm

least squares f ity = mm Xy = 1.242 X

Calibration of Hansen Design ModelTP3 Revised, 4-in criteria – Drilled Shafts Under Drained Moment – 20 Tests – Lognormal PDF

RT5 = 0.75 Rnφ5 = 0.75

Page 29: 177284156 Fundamental Principals Foundation Design

29

MFAD Design ModelThe Schematic Four-Spring Model in MFAD

Page 30: 177284156 Fundamental Principals Foundation Design

30

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000

Predicted Nominal Strength - X (kip-ft)

Test

Str

engt

h - Y

(kip

-ft)

Constant COVm

least squares fity = mm Xy = 0.929 X

Calibration of MFAD Design ModelTP3 Revised, 4-in criteria – Drilled Shafts Under Drained Moment – 20 Tests – Lognormal PDF

RT5 = 0.60 Rnφ5 = 0.60

Page 31: 177284156 Fundamental Principals Foundation Design

31

CAISSON Design Model

Page 32: 177284156 Fundamental Principals Foundation Design

32

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000

Predicted Nominal Strength - X (kip-ft)

Test

Str

engt

h - Y

(kip

-ft)

Constant COVm

least squares f ity = mm Xy = 1.017 X

TP3 Revised, 4-in criteria – Drilled Shafts Under Drained Moment – 20 Tests – Lognormal PDF

Calibration of CAISSON Design Model

RT5 = 0.42 Rnφ5 = 0.42

Page 33: 177284156 Fundamental Principals Foundation Design

33

0.4249.91.0220CAISSON

0.6024.90.9320MFAD

0.7528.91.2420Hansen

φ5(Lognormal

PDF)COVm(%)mmnDesign Model

Summary of Calibration Statistics and Strength Factor Data

Page 34: 177284156 Fundamental Principals Foundation Design

34

Foundation Design Process

INPUT DATA

FOUNDATION DESIGN

CONTRACT DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS

CONSTRUCTION MONITORING

AND AS-BUILT INFORMATION

ASCE MANUAL 74 RBD METHOD

FOUNDATION DESIGN MODEL SELECTION & CALIBRATION

LABORATORY TESTING PROGRAM

Page 35: 177284156 Fundamental Principals Foundation Design

35

Laboratory Testing ProgramCOHESIVE SOILS

•Total Density

•Moisture Content

•Undrained Shear Strength

•Modulus of Deformation

COHESIONLESS SOILS•Total Density

•Moisture Content

•Angle of Internal Friction

•Compaction Characteristics

•Modulus of Deformation

Page 36: 177284156 Fundamental Principals Foundation Design

36

Engineering Property Correlations –Cohesionless Soils

Page 37: 177284156 Fundamental Principals Foundation Design

37

Engineering Property Correlations –Cohesive Soils

Page 38: 177284156 Fundamental Principals Foundation Design

38

Page 39: 177284156 Fundamental Principals Foundation Design

39

Page 40: 177284156 Fundamental Principals Foundation Design

40

Foundation Design Process

INPUT DATA

FOUNDATION DESIGN

CONTRACT DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS

CONSTRUCTION MONITORING

AND AS-BUILT INFORMATION

ASCE MANUAL 74 RBD METHOD

FOUNDATION DESIGN MODEL SELECTION & CALIBRATION

LABORATORY TESTING PROGRAM

SELECTION OF GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN PARAMETERS

Page 41: 177284156 Fundamental Principals Foundation Design

41

Selection of Geotechnical Design Parameters

+ =BORING

LOG

SUMMARY of

LAB TEST RESULTS

SUMMARY of

SELECTED GEOTECHNICAL

DESIGN PARAMETERS

Page 42: 177284156 Fundamental Principals Foundation Design

42

Selection of Geotechnical Design Parameters

Page 43: 177284156 Fundamental Principals Foundation Design

43

Foundation Design ProcessINPUT DATA

FOUNDATION DESIGN

CONTRACT DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS

CONSTRUCTION MONITORING

AND AS-BUILT INFORMATION

ASCE MANUAL 74 RBD METHOD

FOUNDATION DESIGN MODEL SELECTION & CALIBRATION

LABORATORY TESTING PROGRAM

SELECTION OF GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN PARAMETER

FOUNDATION DESIGN

Page 44: 177284156 Fundamental Principals Foundation Design

44

Using the reliability-based design approach, determine D for the Hansen, MFAD and CAISSON design methods.

M50 =1000 kip-ft

D = ?

Groundwater level at surface

Stiff to very stiff clayγT =120 pcfsu = 2.0 ksf

ll = ll = ll ll = ll

Laterally Loaded Drilled ShaftFoundation Design Process

5 FT

Page 45: 177284156 Fundamental Principals Foundation Design

45

Laterally Loaded Drilled ShaftLognormal PDF

23810.42CAISSON16670.60MFAD13330.75Hansen

The Required Nominal Design Moment

Capacity (1)Φ5Design Model

(1)The nominal design capacity moment required = M50/φ5

Foundation Design Process

Page 46: 177284156 Fundamental Principals Foundation Design

46

Nominal Moment Capacity (Mn)Versus Embedment Depth

1000

1100

1200

1300

1400

1500

1600

1700

1800

1900

2000

2100

2200

2300

2400

2500

2600

2700

2800

2900

3000

10.0 10.5 11.0 11.5 12.0 12.5 13.0 13.5 14.0

Embedment Depth (ft)

Nom

inal

Mom

ent C

apac

ity (k

ip-ft

) CAISSON

HANSEN

MFAD

Mn =2381 k-ft

Mn =1667 k-ft

Mn =1333 k-ft

Foundation Design Process

Page 47: 177284156 Fundamental Principals Foundation Design

470

100200300400500600700800900

10001100120013001400150016001700180019002000

10.0 10.5 11.0 11.5 12.0 12.5 13.0 13.5 14.0 14.5 15.0 15.5 16.0

Embedment Depth (ft)

Desig

n Mom

ent C

apac

ity φ

5Mn (

kip-ft)

CAISSON

MFADHANSEN

Design Moment Capacity (Φ5Mn)Versus Embedment Depth

Foundation Design Process

Page 48: 177284156 Fundamental Principals Foundation Design

48

Summary•FOUNDATION DESIGN REQUIRES A BLENDING

•A WELL-PLANNED SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION IS CRITICAL

•IMPLEMENTATION OF THE RBD METHOD IN ASCE MANUAL 74 IS RECOMMENDED

•CALIBRATING FOUNDATION DESIGN METHODS PROVIDES A RATIONAL DESIGN FRAMEWORK FOR DEVELOPING STRENGTH FACTORS

•FIELD INSPECTION OF CONSTRUCTION AND GEOTECHNICAL PARAMETER CONFIRMATION ARE CRITICAL

SOIL/FOUNDATION INTERACTION MODELING

ENGINEERING JUDGEMENT

Page 49: 177284156 Fundamental Principals Foundation Design

49