171s9.2p systems of equations in three...
TRANSCRIPT
171S9.2p Systems of Equations in Three Variables
1
September 14, 2012
Sep 26:46 AM
CHAPTER 9: Systems of Equations and Matrices9.1 Systems of Equations in Two Variables 9.2 Systems of Equations in Three Variables 9.3 Matrices and Systems of Equations
MAT 171 Precalculus AlgebraDr. Claude Moore
Cape Fear Community College
Sep 26:46 AM
9.2 Systems of Equations in Three Variables
• Solve systems of linear equations in three variables.• Use systems of three equations to solve applied problems.• Model a situation using a quadratic function.
To model a quadratic function with the TI, see use of the TI Calculator on the Important Links webpage and click on Modeling – Statistical Modeling with TI83 Calculator – linear, quadratic, and other regressions. (http://cfcc.edu/faculty/cmoore/TI83Modeling.htm)
Sep 26:46 AM
Solving Systems of Equations in Three VariablesA linear equation in three variables is an equation equivalent to one of the form Ax + By + Cz = D. A, B, C, and D are real numbers and A, B, and C are not 0.
A solution of a system of three equations in three variables is an ordered triple that makes all three equations true. Example: The triple (4, 0, 3) is the solution of this system of equations. We can verify this by substituting 4 for x, 0 for y, and 3 for z in each equation. x 2y + 4z = 8 2x + 2y z = 11 x + y 2z = 10
Sep 26:46 AM
Gaussian Elimination
An algebraic method used to solve systems in three variables.The original system is transformed to an equivalent
one of the form: Ax + By + Cz = D, Ey + Fz = G, Hz = K. Then the third equation is solved for z and backsubstitution is used to find y and then x.
Sep 26:46 AM
Legal Operations
The following operations can be used to transform the original system to an equivalent system in the desired form.
1. Interchange any two equations.2. Multiply both sides of one of the equations by a nonzero constant.3. Add a nonzero multiple of one equation to another equation.
Sep 26:46 AM
Example
Solve the system(1) x + 3y + 2z = 9 (2) x y + 3z = 16(3) 3x 4y + 2z = 28
Solution: Choose 1 variable to eliminate using 2 different pairs of equations. Let’s eliminate x from equations (2) and (3).
171S9.2p Systems of Equations in Three Variables
2
September 14, 2012
Sep 26:46 AM
Example
−x − 3y − 2z = −9 Mult. (1) by −1 x − y + 3z = 16 (2) −4y + z = 7 (4)
−3x − 9y − 6z = −27 Mult. (1) by −3 3x − 4y + 2z = 28 (3) −13y − 4z = 1 (5)
Solve the system
(1) x + 3y + 2z = 9 (2) x y + 3z = 16(3) 3x 4y + 2z = 28
Sep 26:46 AM
Example continued
Now we have… x + 3y + 2z = 9 (1) 4y + z = 7 (4) 13y 4z = 1 (5) Next, we multiply equation (4) by 4 to make the z coefficient a multiple of the z coefficient in the equation below it. x + 3y + 2z = 9 (1) 16y + 4z = 28 (6) 13y 4z = 1 (5)
Sep 26:46 AM
Example continued
Now, we add equations (5) and (6). 13y 4z = 1 (5) 16y + 4z = 28 (6) 29y = 29
Now, we have the system of equations: x + 3y + 2z = 9 (1) 13y 4z = 1 (5) 29y = 29 (7)
Sep 26:46 AM
Example continued
Next, we solve equation (7) for y: 29y = 29 y = 1
Then, we backsubstitute 1 in equation (5) and solve for z. 13(1) 4z = 1 13 4z = 1 4z = 12 z = 3
Sep 26:46 AM
Example continued
Finally, we substitute −1 for y and 3 for z in equation (1) and solve for x: x + 3(−1) + 2(3) = 9 x − 3 + 6 = 9 x = 6
The triple (6, −1, 3) is the solution of this system.
Sep 26:46 AM
GraphsThe graph of a linear equation in three variables is a plane. Thus the solution set of such a system is the intersection of three planes.
171S9.2p Systems of Equations in Three Variables
3
September 14, 2012
Sep 26:46 AM
Application
A food service distributor conducted a study to predict fuel usage for new delivery routes, for a particular truck. Use the chart to find the rates of fuel in rush hour traffic, city traffic, and on the highway.
633
34186Week 32487Week 21592Week 1
Sep 26:46 AM
Solution1. Familiarize. We let x, y, and z represent the hours in rush hour traffic, city traffic, and highway, respectively. 2. Translate. We have three equations: 2x + 9y + 3z = 15 (1) 7x + 8y + 3z = 24 (2) 6x + 18y + 6z = 34 (3)3. Carry Out. We will solve this equation by eliminating z from equations (2) and (3). 2x 9y 3z = 15 Mult. (1) by 1 7x + 8y + 3z = 24 (2) 5x y = 9 (4)
633
34186Week 32487Week 21592Week 1
Sep 26:46 AM
Solution continued Next, we can solve for x: 4x 18y 6z = 30 Mult. (1) by 2
6x + 18y + 6z = 34 (3) 2x = 4 x = 2 Next, we can solve for y by substituting 2 for x in equation (4): 5(2) y = 9 y = 1 Finally, we can substitute 2 for x and 1 for y in equation (1) to solve for z: 2(2) + 9(1) + 3z = 15 4 + 9 + 3z = 15 3z = 2
z = Solving the system we get (2, 1, ).
Sep 26:46 AM
Solution continued
4. Check: Substituting 2 for x, 1 for y, and for z, we see that the solution makes each of the three equations true.
5. State: In rush hour traffic the distribution truck uses fuel at a rate of 2 gallons per hour. In city traffic, the same truck uses 1 gallon of fuel per hour. In highway traffic, the same truck used gallon of fuel per hour.
Sep 27:22 AM
764/2. Solve the system of equations. x + 6y + 3z = 42x + y + 2z = 33x 2y + z = 0
Sep 27:22 AM
764/8. Solve the system of equations. x + 2y z = 44x 3y + z = 85x y = 12
171S9.2p Systems of Equations in Three Variables
4
September 14, 2012
Sep 27:22 AM
764/10. Solve the system of equations. x + 3y + 4z = 13x + 4y + 5z = 3 x + 8y + 11z = 2
Sep 27:22 AM
764/16. Solve the system of equations. w + x y + z = 0 w + 2x + 2y + z = 5 w + 3x + y z = 42w + x + y 3z = 7
Sep 27:22 AM
765/20. Adopting Abroad. The three foreign countries from which the largest number of children were adopted in 2009 were China, Ethiopia, and Russia. A total of 6864 children were adopted from these countries. The number of children adopted from China was 862 fewer than the total number adopted from Ethiopia and Russia. Twice the number adopted from Russia is 171 more than the number adopted from China. (Source: U.S. Department of State) Find the number of children adopted from each country.
Sep 27:22 AM
765/22. Mother’s Day Spending. The top three Mother’s Day gifts are flowers, jewelry, and gift certificates. The total of the average amounts spent on these gifts is $53.42. The average amount spent on jewelry is $4.40 more than the average amount spent on gift certificates. Together, the average amounts spent on flowers and gift certificates is $15.58 more than the average amount spent on jewelry. (Source: BIGresearch) What is the average amount spent on each type of gift?
Sep 27:22 AM
766/29. Investment. Walter earns a yearend bonus of $5000 and puts it in 3 oneyear investments that pay $243 in simple interest. Part is invested at 3%, part at 4%, and part at 6%. There is $1500 more invested at 6% than at 3%. Find the amount invested at each rate.
Sep 27:22 AM
766/32. Cost of Snack Food. Martin and Eva pool their loose change to buy snacks on their coffee break. One day, they spent $6.75 on 1 carton of milk, 2 donuts, and 1 cup of coffee. The next day, they spent $8.50 on 3 donuts and 2 cups of coffee. The third day, they bought 1 carton of milk, 1 donut, and 2 cups of coffee and spent $7.25. On the fourth day, they have a total of $6.45 left. Is this enough to buy 2 cartons of milk and 2 donuts?
171S9.2p Systems of Equations in Three Variables
5
September 14, 2012
Sep 27:22 AM
766/34. Student Loans. The table below lists the volume of nonfederal student loans, in billions of dollars, represented in terms of the number of years since 2004.
See Modeling tutorial for calculator at http://cfcc.edu/faculty/cmoore/TISTAT.htm#algebra
a) Fit a quadratic function f (x) = ax2 + bx + c to the data, where x is the number of years since 2004. b) Use the function to estimate the volume of nonfederal student loans in 2007.
f(x) = 1.8625x2 + 6.425x + 15.1; 2007, x = 3 & y = $17,613 billions in nonfederal student loans in 2007.
Sep 27:22 AM
767/37. Unemployment Rate. The table below lists the U.S. unemployment rate in October for selected years.
See Modeling tutorial for calculator at http://cfcc.edu/faculty/cmoore/TISTAT.htm#algebra
a) Use a graphing calculator to fit a quadratic function f (x) = ax2 + bx + c to the data, where x is the number of years since 2002. b) Use the function found in part (a) to estimate the unemployment rate in 2003, in 2007, and in 2009.
f(x) = 0.1437x2 0.6922x + 5.8825; US unemployment rates for years 2003: x = 1 & y = 5.3%; 2007: x = 5 & y = 6.0%; 2009: x = 7 & y = 8.1%
Sep 121:44 PM
766/33. Job Loss. The table below lists the percent of American workers who responded that they were likely to be laid off from their jobs in the coming year, x is the number of years since 1990.
a) Fit a quadratic function f (x) = ax2 + bx + c
to the data, where x is the number of years since 1990.
b) Use the function to estimate the percent of workers who responded that they were likely to be laid off in the coming year in 2003.
Do NOT use calculator.
Sep 121:44 PM
766/33. Job Loss. The table below lists the percent of American workers who responded that they were likely to be laid off from their jobs in the coming year, x represents the number of years since 1990.
a) Fit a quadratic function f (x) = ax2 + bx + c
to the data, where x is the number of years since 1990.
b) Use the function to estimate the percent of workers who responded that they were likely to be laid off in the coming year in 2003.
Do NOT use calculator.
Sep 121:44 PM
766/33. Job Loss. The table below lists the percent of American workers who responded that they were likely to be laid off from their jobs in the coming year, x represents the number of years since 1990.
a) Fit a quadratic function f (x) = ax2 + bx + c
to the data, where x is the number of years since 1990.
b) Use the function to estimate the percent of workers who responded that they were likely to be laid off in the coming year in 2003.
Do NOT use calculator.
Sep 121:44 PM
766/33. Job Loss. The table below lists the percent of American workers who responded that they were likely to be laid off from their jobs in the coming year, x represents the number of years since 1990.
a) Fit a quadratic function f (x) = ax2 + bx + c
to the data, where x is the number of years since 1990.
b) Use the function to estimate the percent of workers who responded that they were likely to be laid off in the coming year in 2003.
Do NOT use calculator.