16/12/2002 1 texture alignment in simple shear hans mühlhaus,frederic dufour and louis moresi
Post on 21-Dec-2015
220 views
TRANSCRIPT
16/12/2002 2
Outline
I) Introduction
II) Numerical methods
III) Rheological models
IV) Applications
V) Conclusions and perspectives
16/12/2002 3
Problem
To model in large transformations a large range of materials at equilibrium.
0div fσ
16/12/2002 4
Idea of the Particle in Cell method (PIC)
• Eulerian finite element mesh
• Lagrangian particles used as integration points
• Time variables are stored on particles
• Updated Lagrangian formulation
16/12/2002 7
Integration scheme
Constant terms
epn
1pp 2
Linear terms
epn
1ppp 0x
Quadratic temrs, etc…
epn
1p
2pp 3/2x
FEM PIC
1
1
n
1iii
ep
fdf
16/12/2002 8
Forced convection
A reference solution is calculated over a 36800 node mesh, with Gauss
integration.
Parametric study over a 2300 node mesh with
particles regularly distributed and weighted
initially.
16/12/2002 9
Solution de référence
4 particules
Solution de référenceReference solution
4 particles
16 particles
How many particles?
Initially 4×4 particles
16/12/2002 10
tep C tep C
Termeslinéaires
Termesconstants
What condition on the weight?
Conditions to the linear terms
tep CConstant terms
16/12/2002 13
Maxwell viscoelasticity
Dττ
22Deviatoric part
)(trp
K
p
e
D
Isotropic part
Integration scheme
tttte
ttttt
t)(
e
e
ωττωττ
τ
e
ttt
t
ppp
e
Deviatoric relaxation time
And volumiceK
Lawett
et
ett
t
t
t
t1
σσσ
σωωσσσ
Jaumann derivative
16/12/2002 14
Viscoelastic oscillations
Shearte
2,1 Cv
Constitutive relationship
1212
2,112
221122112211
vD
0DD22
2,1*
2,1e
vtt
vμ
η
relaxation de Temps
nobservatiod' TempsD
Using
2,1
22
22,1121212 vv2
Second order PDE
2e
2,1**D
t
12 D1
vtcosBtsinAe e
*
Solution
16/12/2002 15
10sΔte 1sΔt e 0,1sΔte 0,01sΔt e
10sΔte 1sΔt e 0,1sΔt e
10sΔte 1sΔt e 10sΔte 10sΔte 1sΔt e 0,1sΔte 0,01sΔt e
0,006sΔt e 0,005sΔt e
10sΔte 1sΔt e 0,1sΔte 0,01sΔt e
0,006sΔt e
Stability/accuracy of the scheme
= 1,0sh0 = 1,0mt = 0,01s
V
h(t)
Compression :
0t9s V=0,1m/s
Relaxation :
A t=9s V=0 m/s Stability
Accurace
tt e
),min(01,0t e
16/12/2002 16
Cosserat theory
Stress approach
0me
0bVikliklj,ij
ij,ij
Kinematic approach
ckijkj,iij ev
16/12/2002 17
zy
zx
yx
xy
yy
xx
c
cc
zy
zx
yx
xy
yy
xx
.
M
0M.sym
00
00
0000
0000
2cd2M
Cosserat rheology in 2D
Bending viscosity Where d is the internallength of the material
16/12/2002 19
Finite Anisotropy
Director evolution
n : the director of the anisotropyW, Wn : spin and director spinD, D’: stretching and its deviatoric part
)( kikjkjkiijnij DDWW
ij nin j
jniji nWn
16/12/2002 20
Anisotropy (kinematic)
Evolution of the director
Evolution of the thickness of the layer
tωn n
DnnT
h
h
n3
c3
16/12/2002 21
Couple stresses
Elastic: 2
1
22
3
1
X
uhm s
Viscous: 2
1
22
3
1
X
uhm s
2
1
X
uc
X1
t hF
16/12/2002 22
Virtual Power
dVX
uhEE sstandard
2
21
22
2
3
1
Requires continuously differentiable shape functions:inconvenient !
Penalty formulation:
dVX
h3
1dVuP2dV
X
uh
3
12
1
c2
s
2c1,2
2
21
22
2s
Pasu
ercovretohopeweESincec
1,2
16/12/2002 23
dV:PPV
cij
nij
cij
nij
cijijijijint P : penalty term
Anisotropy (C0 reconstruction)
V V
iSiiii
Viii
V
ijijijij dAmutdVmubdVKM
Principle of virtual power extint PP
dVP2PV
mnijijmncijijijijint
16/12/2002 24
Convergence of Penalty Method
D im e n s io n le s s v e lo c i t y )/( hSVV v e r s u s d im e n s io n le s s
p e n a lt y p a r a m e t e r SPP / ; a n a ly t ic a l s o lu t io n ( c r o s s e d ) ;
n u m e r ic a l , f u l l in t e g r a t io n ( b r o k e n l in e ) ; n u m e r ic a l , o n e p o in t in t e g r a t io n ( s o l id l in e ) . F in i t e e le m e n t m o d e l : e i g h t b y t w e lv e f o u r n o d e d q u a d r i la t e r a ls ; s ix t e e n p a r t ic le s p e r e le m e n t . P e r io d ic b o u n d a r ie s o n t h e s id e s , i . e . v e lo c i t ie s a n d r o t a t io n s a r e t h e s a m e o n b o t h s id e s ; i f o n e p a r t ic le le a v e s t h e d o m a in o n o n e s id e i t r e - a p p e a r s o n t h e o t h e r s id e . 2/ S , t / h = 0 . 2 ; t = t h ic k n e s s o f t h e in d iv id u a l
la y e r s a n d h is t h e t h ic k n e s s o f t h e s h e a r la y e r . D u r in g t h e c a lc u la t io n t h e d i r e c t o r o r ie n t a t io n is fi x e d a t n = ( 1 , 0 ) , i . e . t h e in t e r n a l la y e r in g is a lw a y s o r t h o g o n a l t o t h e x 2 = c o n s t .
16/12/2002 25
Anisotropic rheology
Constitutive relationship for the deviatoric stress Cγτ
ΔC
CCCC
P2
00
00
0020
0002
S0S011
S0S011
1100
1100
penortho
22
21S0 nn4
21
2221S1 nnnn2
with
16/12/2002 26
Flambement d’une couche anisotrope
Isotropic background medium with viscosity : 0,001 Pa.sAnisotropic layer of normal viscosity 1 Pa.s
And tangenial viscosity 0,001 Pa.s
Initial perturbation
of the director’s
orientation
Change of major mode for 5De
Mühlhaus et al, 2002
16/12/2002 27
Simple Shear and Convection Problems
ij'klijklS
'ijij pD)(2D2
Constitutive equations:
)RT
Qexp(and.const/ 0S
Temperature dependent viscosities:
Stress and Thermal equilibrium:
ijiji,i,i,it,0
i,j,'klijklS
'ij
D)kT()TvT(C
0p)D)(2D2(
Non-dimensionalisation:
]CT/[]H/v[Di
]v/H/[]k/C[Pe*tv/Ht
0000
00o
H2x
1x
12010 orvvTT
0v0T 12, 0tv0
0tv0
tv0
16/12/2002 28
Heat Equation cont.
ijiji,i,i,it, DDi)TPe
1(TvTT
C is the heat capacity; 800-1000 W/(kg K)
k is the thermal conductivity; 2.3-3.5 W/(m K)
Reference viscosity Pa
Density
Activation Energy Q= 180-550 KJ/mol
Universal Gas Constant R=0.00831J/(mol K)
330 m/kg105.45.2
16/12/2002 29
maxv
maxT
10
12
22
maxT
ntdisplacemetop
alignment
maxv
maxT
12
22
5
0Tand0vv:0x
1TTand0v;1:1x:s.'c.B
1HlayershearofWidth
ntdisplacemetop
2,212
ref2122
maxv 0
190
p0
0p0
0
RT
Qexp10
8400D
HVcPe
79.0HTc
VDi
10
Shear Histories simple shear and shear alignment with shear heating and temperature dependent viscosity
16/12/2002 31
Shear Alignment with Shear Heating and Temperature Dependent Viscosity
12
22
maxT
alignment
ntdisplacemetop
nvnv 1221 vnvn
),sin(alignment
Alignment=0 if n is parallel to v and = 1 if n is orthogonal(steady state!) to v.
Initialconfiguration
Final (aligned)configuration
16/12/2002 32
Conclusions
Benchmark for the Particle in Cell method
16 particles initially for a good integration
Constraints on the weight to the linear terms
Appetite of 0,8
Developing/implementing new rheologies
Cosserat continuum
Viscoelasticity
Anisotropic model (classical or in a Cosserat context)
Bingham’s law for mortar
Benchmarks were successfull in the context of comparison with theory of with other numerical methods.
16/12/2002 33
Conclusions
Applications
Performant tool to study geological folding
Promising first steps on the study of fresh concrete flow
Drawbacks of the method
Traction boundary conditions
Diffusion of the interface by separation of the particles
Uncertainty on the quality of the numerical integration
Expertise needed