16 may06 1 integrated shipbuilding environment 4 (ise 4) demonstration overview presentation for...

16 May‘06 1

Integrated Shipbuilding Environment 4 (ISE 4)

Demonstration Overview

Presentation for Seattle NSRP Panel Meetings

May 16, 2006

Ron Wood

Burt Gischner

16 May‘06 2

Agenda

• Product Data Interoperability Overview– Dan Billingsley, NSRP Program Manager, NAVSEA 05DM

– Pete Halvordson, Vice President, Engineering, GD Electric Boat

– Rick Self, NSRP Executive Director, ATI Corporation

• ISE Project– Overview/Background of ISE

• ISE 4– Live Demonstration

This is only a recap of a 2.5 hour slide & live demo done in Washington on April 27th. Full content of presentation is available on http://www.isetools.org

16 May‘06 3

Attendees

• Total Qty: appx 50

• Navy Qty: 16 including Senior Navy attendees:– Deputy PEO Subs (McNamara), – 2 PEO Ships Deputies (Art Divens and Al Weyman)– NAVSEA 08 rep– Howard Fireman (SEA05D)

• RAN Representative

16 May‘06 4

The Problem Addressed• While credited with major reductions in design and manufacturing cost, IPDEs

pose a significant software development / integration challenge and expense. – IPDE cost for a major ship or submarine construction program can total $150M to

$200M, of which 45-55% is for integration planning, information engineering and interface software development.

• Typically each ship or submarine program develops an IPDE to take advantage of latest hardware and software and to suit– program requirements,– team member work practices, and – team member business relationships

• Interoperability among components has been achieved by ad-hoc and proprietary interfaces resulting in: – Duplication of development effort,– 8-10 partially integrated systems that are not interoperable with others,– Annual integration expenses of $10M-$30M for each major program,– Multiple incompatible systems at each shipyard, and – Numerous inconsistent sources of product information for Navy engineering and

service life support.

16 May‘06 5

The Problem (con’t)

• Information technology ages quickly - access to vital product data becomes problematic early in the ships life cycle

• Managing the Cost and Risk of Computer Systems Development – IDE / IPDE / PLM

– The development of these systems represents a significant investment in time and money

– It can represent a significant amount of Program risk

– Interoperability of disparate systems remains a significant challenge

16 May‘06 6

Shipbuilders’ 3D CAD Systemsby CAD systemby Program

Program Location 3D CAD

CV(RCOH)* NGNN AutoCADCV(RCOH)* NNSY AutoCAD

CVN 21 NGNN Catia 4 AECCVN 21 EB Catia 4 AECDD(X) BIW Catia 5DD(X) NGSS Pascagoula Catia 5

DDG 51 BIW CADDS 5DDG 51 NGSS Pascagoula Dim 3DDG 51 LM AutoCAD

DDX NGSS Pascagoula Catia 5DDX BIW Catia 5

Deepwater NGSS Avondale Ship ConstructorLCAC Textron AutoCAD

LCS LM* LM Ship ConstructorLCS LM* Marinette Ship ConstructorLCS LM* Bollinger Ship ConstructorLCS GD* BIW AutoCADLCS GD* Austal AutoCADLHA 6* NGSS Pascagoula Velum/AutoCADLHD 8* NGSS Pascagoula Velum/AutoCADLPD 17 NGSS Avondale ISDPLPD 17 BIW ISDPLPD 17 NGSS Pascagoula ISDPSSN 21 EB CADDS 3SSN 21 NGNN VIVIDSSN 23 EB Catia 4 MechSSGN* EB Catia 4 MechT-AKE NASSCO TribonVirginia EB Catia 4 MechVirginia NGNN Catia 4 Mech

* ship partially modeled in 3D

Program Location 3D CAD

CV(RCOH)* NGNN AutoCADCV(RCOH)* NNSY AutoCAD

DDG 51 LM AutoCADLCAC Textron AutoCAD

LCS GD* BIW AutoCADLCS GD* Austal AutoCADSSN 21 EB CADDS 3DDG 51 BIW CADDS 5CVN 21 NGNN Catia 4 AECCVN 21 EB Catia 4 AECSSN 23 EB Catia 4 MechSSGN* EB Catia 4 MechVirginia EB Catia 4 MechVirginia NGNN Catia 4 MechDD(X) BIW Catia 5DD(X) NGSS Pascagoula Catia 5DDX NGSS Pascagoula Catia 5DDX BIW Catia 5

DDG 51 NGSS Pascagoula Dim 3LPD 17 NGSS Avondale ISDPLPD 17 BIW ISDPLPD 17 NGSS Pascagoula ISDP

Deepwater NGSS Avondale Ship ConstructorLCS LM* LM Ship ConstructorLCS LM* Marinette Ship ConstructorLCS LM* Bollinger Ship Constructor

T-AKE NASSCO TribonLHA 6* NGSS Pascagoula Velum/AutoCADLHD 8* NGSS Pascagoula Velum/AutoCADSSN 21 NGNN VIVID

* ship partially modeled in 3D

16 May‘06 7

• Across organizations– Co-production / Co-design - more flexibility in teaming & 2nd sourcing.– Acquisition programs can re-use engineering tools and data

management components developed by preceding programs.– Expedited review of shipbuilder designs by government engineering

agents.– Enable common methods of handling product data for service life

support

• Within shipyards – Components can be upgraded or replaced without major disruption or

redevelopment of the rest of the IPDE infrastructure – yielding improved flexibility, improved leverage with vendors and reduction of recurring cost.

– Third-party capability can be introduced in specific areas including discipline-focused software developed by ABS, ONR, DARPA, academia and industry.

– Reduce/eliminate need for multiple IPDE’s within a single yard.

Business Drivers for InteroperabilityBusiness Drivers for Interoperability

16 May‘06 8

Standard Approved

Standard Development

Information Model

Testing Framework

Prototype Translators

Information interoperability lifecycle

RolesRoles

ISOISO

NSRPNSRP

NAVSEANAVSEA

NAVALNAVALPROGRAMPROGRAM

Information Information interoperabilityinteroperability

specificationspecification

ContractualSpecification

Deployment, integration, testing

Phases:Phases:RequirementsRequirementsdefinitiondefinition

Production deploymentProduction deployment

Tech

nology

Tech

nology

Bu

siness D

ecisions

Bu

siness D

ecisions

Well-Defined Solution Path –- much progress -- $17M to complete

16 May‘06 9

Interoperability Status

Shared Concept of Shared Concept of Information Content Information Content and Relationshipsand Relationships

Native A Native BT T

ExchangeExchangeFormatFormatSpecSpec

Contract Contract TermsTerms

Acquisition PolicyAcquisition Policy

STEPSTEPXMLXML

SubstantiallSubstantially completey complete

DoN Policy DoN Policy Memo Oct Memo Oct

20042004

SubstantiallSubstantially completey complete

Prototyped by NSRP

Negotiated program by

program

16 May‘06 10

ISE Background

• First NSRP major systems technology project• Phase 1: Requirements definition and architecture for

shipbuilding systems interoperability» March 1999 to December 1999

• Phase 2: Deployment for Structure & Piping » March 2000 to December 2003

• Phase 3: Deployment for HVAC & CPC Interfaces» October 2003 to October 2004

• Phase 4: Current Project – Deployment of Ship Compartmentation – Deployment for Engineering Analysis– Prototype for Electrical– Prototype, Steel Processing with Rules Processing

» April 2005 to July 2006

16 May‘06 11

ISE Project Approach

• Develop and demonstrate tools that are low cost – can be selectively used by shipyards to support interoperability– capitalize on XML and related Internet technologies

• Flexibility is critical– allow shipyards to transform their data to/from common

information model

• Drive development of international shipbuilding product data standards (e.g. STEP, PLIB)– Construct a single Shipbuilding Information Model – Demonstrate and educate U.S. shipbuilding community– Now approved international standards

16 May‘06 12

ISE Architecture

• Accessible to large and small shipyards– Only system dependency is Web infrastructure– Utilizes open standards

• Innovative integration of STEP and XML technologies– Supports sharing of geometry & geometric product models

• Permissive (mediation) architecture– Lets each enterprise choose its own tool set

• Incorporated into CAD platforms used by U.S. shipbuilders

ISE architecture represents an innovative, practical solutionto the information interoperability challenge

16 May‘06 13

The Navy and Shipbuilders

Are Using Product Model Data Technology

Product Model Data = 3-D CAD + definitions + other documentation

Continued investment is key indication of value

16 May‘06 14

This ship is used to locate and retrieve torpedoes and missile drones. It has a maximum payload capacity of 42 long tons which includes the deck cargo plus full liquids, full complement, and normal stores.

This ship was selected because it is in-service, has a complete set of drawings available for distribution, and is:

Approved for Public Release: Distribution Unlimited.

The ISE Test Ship - TWR 841

16 May‘06 15

Team Participants

ISE 2 ISE 3 ISE 4

Electric Boat √ √ √Northrop Grumman Ship Systems √ √ √Northrop Grumman Newport News √Bath Iron Works √NASSCO √Kvaerner Philadelphia √NSWC-CD √ √ √Intergraph √ √ √Atlantec-es √ √ √Sener √ √ √SIMSMART √ √STEPTools, Inc. √ √Anteon/Proteus Engineering √Northrop Grumman Information Technology √IBM √ √NIIIP √ √Product Data Services Corporation √Knowledge Systems Solutions √American Bureau of Shipping √√ERIM √Marine Machinery Association (MMA) √Industrial Planning Technology √√University of Connecticut √Gulf Coast Regional Maritime Center/UNO √University of Michigan √

16 May‘06 16

ISE2 Demonstration

16 May‘06 17

ISE3 Demo Overview

16 May‘06 18

DONXML

• The Department of Navy (DON) vision for Extensible Markup Language (XML) is to fully exploit XML as an enabling technology to achieve interoperability in support of maritime superiority

• For cataloging product data in XML format, the DONXML working group has agreed to allow the STEP Schemas developed under the ISE Project to be registered in the DONXML repository. Schemas registered to date:– Ship Moulded Forms (AP216): 2 Use cases

– Ship Structures (AP218): 2 Use Cases

– Piping (AP227): 2 Use Cases

– HVAC (AP227): 1 Use Case

– Common Parts Catalog: 1 Use Case

• ISE4 Schemas will be registered

16 May‘06 19

ISE Product Model Prototyping

Ship Product Model Data

Ship Structural Envelope

Distribution Systems

Equipment / Subsystems

Life Cycle Maintenance

Miscellaneous

HVACISO AP 227:2005

PipingISO AP 227:2005

Ship ArrangementISO AP 215:2004

Ship Moulded FormsISO AP 216:2003

Ship StructuresISO AP 218:2004

Reference Data Libraries

ISO 15926

Common Parts Catalog (CPC)

Mechanical SystemsISO AP 227:2005

Cable TraysISO AP 227:2005

Finite Element Analysis

ISO AP 209:2001

Product Config/ Geometry

ISO AP 203:1994

Systems EngineeringISO AP 233

Computational Fluid DynamicsISO AP 237

Logistics / SparesISO AP 232:2002

Outfit & FurnishingsNSRP 0428:1992

Manufacturing Support

ISO APs 224, 238, 240

Standard Approved

Information Model


Testing Framework

Deployment, integration,testing

Standard In Work

Product Life Cycle SupportISO AP 239

ElectricalISO AP 212:2001

16 May‘06 20

Presentation Agenda

• Interoperability Demo Scenario• Ship Arrangements Exchanges using AP215 and AP216

– Initial Design in TRIBON

– Transfer from TRIBON to LEAPS

– Modifications in FORAN

– Transfer from FORAN to LEAPS (and ISDP)

– Transfer from ISDP to Intelliship

• Electrical Demonstration using AP212• Engineering Analysis Exchanges using AP218 and AP209• Steel Processing Exchanges using AP218

16 May‘06 21

Demo will Feature Product Model Data

TWR 3D Product Model

Geometry

Engine Room

ISE4:

Arrangements

Engineering Analysis

Electrical Design

Steel Processing

from the TWR Engine Room

16 May‘06 22

Demo Scenarios for the Four ISE4 Tasks

Four Tasks and Demonstrations

Initial Design Detail Design Manufacturing Lifecycle Support

Engineering FEA Analysis

Concept & Preliminary Design Stage

DetailDesign Stage

Steel Processing

Electrical

Arrangements

16 May‘06 23

Systems Involved in the Interoperability Demo


TRIBON ISDP

LEAPS

LEAPS


FORAN

Preliminary Arrangement

Feed Mfg from ISDP

ModifyArrangement

Partnership Yard

INTELLISHIP

Repair Shipyard

SuggestDesign

ChangesSubmit Design

ApprovalFinal Product Model Delivered to Navy

GDEB NGSS

Steel Processing

Navy AnalysisPrograms


B

B

C

= Mediators Required

Concept & Preliminary Design

DetailDesign

Sener Intergraph

EBC

ADAPT

Key:

Atlantec

= Demonstrated = Not Demonstrated

ElectricalKSS/KM

NavyResponse

Center

AP215P21

AP215P28

AP215P28

AP218P28

AP218P28

AP209P21

AP215P21

AAP212P28

AP212P21

SubmitDesign

For Approval

Arrangements

16 May‘06 24

Ship Arrangements Demo Details


TRIBON ISDP

LEAPS

LEAPS

FORAN


ModifyArrangement

Partnership Yard

INTELLISHIP

Repair Shipyard

SuggestDesign

ChangesSubmit Design

ApprovalFinal Product Model Delivered to Navy

B

B



DetailDesign

Sener

Intergraph

Key:

Atlantec

= Demonstrated = Not Demonstrated

NavyResponse

Center

AP215P21

AP215P28

AP215P28

AP215P21

SubmitDesign

For Approval

Arrangements

Navy AnalysisPrograms


16 May‘06 25

Integrated Shipbuilding Environment

Washington DC • April 27, 2006

Arrangements Demonstration

16 May‘06 26

Demo Scenario – Tribon Translator

Tribon Initial Design

AtlantecAP215

Translator

TribonOutput

Files

STEP / XMLAP 215 File

MediatorsSTEP

AP 215 File

FORAN

LEAPS

Translation Process – High Level

16 May‘06 27

Overview – LEAPS AP215 Translators

Project accomplishments:

• Developed STEP AP215 Import and Export Translators for Navy LEAPS system.

• PDSC is ISO Editor of STEP AP215. Provided AP215 documents, ARM/AIM EXPRESS schemas, and training/consulting to ISE team.

• Developed and maintained ISE AP215 Implementation Agreements and Issues Logs for ISE Team.

• Submitted 20 SEDS (Standard Enhancement and Discrepancy System) to ISO for inclusion in next version of ISO AP215 standard.

Product Data Services Corporation (PDSC) for NSWC Carderock Division

16 May‘06 28


LEAPS – Leading Edge Application for Prototyping Systems

• Central Navy Repository for Ship design and analysis.

• Developed and supported by NSWC Carderock Division.

• Common database for 3D Product Model Data and Analysis results for new Ship Acquisition.

• Direct translators from ASSET for initial arrangements and to NAVSEA analysis software for performance and vulnerability assessments.

16 May‘06 29


LEAPS – Leading Edge Application for Prototyping Systems

Analysis Tools

Focus O bject M odel

M odelingTools

A SS E T

Part Library

R adar S ignature

IR S ign ature

Vulnerability

C ost

S im S m art

E lectrical Sys.

M anning

P ropulsors

R M &A

Structures

O ther CA D

O ther CA D

STEP

G atew ay

VisM ockUp

E ditor

Analysis Tools

Focus O bject M odel

M odelingTools

A SS E T

Part Library

R adar S ignature

IR S ign ature

Vulnerability

C ost

S im S m art

E lectrical Sys.

M anning

P ropulsors

R M &A

Structures

R adar S ignature

IR S ign ature

Vulnerability

C ost

S im S m art

E lectrical Sys.

M anning

P ropulsors

R M &A

Structures

O ther CA D

O ther CA D

STEP

O ther CA D

O ther CA D

STEP

G atew ay

VisM ockUp

E ditor G atew ay

VisM ockUp

E ditor

16 May‘06 30

Demo Scenario – FORAN Translator

Detail Design in FORAN

ISDP used by Partnering Shipyard

LEAPS for Customer Review

and Approval

Preliminary Design done in TRIBON has been transferred to LEAPS for Navy review and suggestions for design changes are forwarded to shipyard using FORAN who will perform Detail Design

SENERAP215

Translator

STEPAP 215 File

16 May‘06 31

SENER - FORAN

L I S T O F C O M P A R T M E N T S O F T H E T W R S H I P ’ S F O R A N 3 D M O D E L

C O M P A R T M E N T

N U M B E R

D E S C R I P T I O N L O N G .

P O S I T I O N S I

D E S H I P ’ S Z O N E

S e e F i g

1 L A Z A R E T T E F r . 2 5 – 2 8 P - S B E L O W M A I N D E C K 2

2 E N G I N E R O O M F r . 1 6 – 2 3 P - S B E L O W M A I N D E C K 1

3 P U M P R O O M F r . 1 2 – 1 6 P - S B E L O W M A I N D E C K 1

4 P R O V I S I O N S T O R E R O O M F r . 1 0 . 5 - 1 2 C B E L O W M A I N D E C K 2

5 O B S E R V E R S B E R T H I N G F r . 9 . 5 – 1 2 S B E L O W M A I N D E C K 2

6 C R E W B E R T H I N G F r . 6 – 9 . 5 P - S B E L O W M A I N D E C K 2

7 B O W T H U S T E R S P A C E F r . 4 . 5 – 6 P - S B E L O W M A I N D E C K 2

8 B O S U N S S T O R E S F r . 2 – 4 . 5 P - S B E L O W M A I N D E C K 2

9 V O I D S P A C E F r . 2 – 4 . 5 P - S D O U B L E B O T T O M 1

1 0 C H A I N S L O C K E R F r . 1 . 5 – 2 C B E L O W M A I N D E C K 2

1 1 C . O . S T A T E R O O M F r . 4 . 5 – 7 P D E C K H O U S E 3

1 2 C . P . O . S T A T E R O O M F r . 4 . 5 – 7 S D E C K H O U S E 3

1 3 W A S H R O O M , W C &

S H O W E R F r . 7 – 8 . 5 P D E C K H O U S E 3

1 4 E L E C T R I C A L

E Q U I P M E N T R O O M F r . 7 – 8 S D E C K H O U S E 3

1 5 A I R H A N D L I N G R O O M F r . 8 – 1 0 S D E C K H O U S E 3

1 6 G A L L E Y F r . 1 0 – 1 3 . 5 S D E C K H O U S E 3

1 7 B O S U N S ’ S L O C K E R –

D E C K G E A R F r . 1 3 . 5 –

1 4 . 5 S D E C K H O U S E 3

1 8 S H E L T E R D E C K A R E A F r . 1 3 . 5 – 1 5 P D E C K H O U S E

( O P E N A I R S P A C E ) 1

1 9 M E S S / L O U N G E F r . 8 . 5 –

1 3 . 5 P D E C K H O U S E 3

2 0 P I L O T H O U S E F r . 6 – 1 0 P - S P I L O T H O U S E 1

2 1 F O R E P E A K F r . ( - 2 ) – 2 P - S B E L O W M A I N D E C K 1

2 2 B A L L A S T T A N K N o . 1 F r . 6 – 9 S D O U B L E B O T T O M 3

2 3 B A L L A S T T A N K N o . 2 F r . 6 – 9 P D O U B L E B O T T O M 1

2 4 B A L L A S T T A N K N o . 3 F r . 2 3 – 2 5 S B E L O W M A I N D E C K 3

2 5 B A L L A S T T A N K N o . 4 F r . 2 3 – 2 5 P B E L O W M A I N D E C K 2

2 6 P O T A B L E W A T E R T A N K

N o . 1 F r . 1 2 . 5 –

1 5 . 5 S I N S I D E P U M P R O O M 2

2 7 P O T A B L E W A T E R T A N K

N o . 2 F r . 1 2 . 5 –

1 5 . 5 P I N S I D E P U M P R O O M 2

2 8 F U E L O I L T A N K N o . 1 F r . 9 – 1 2 S D O U B L E B O T T O M 3

2 9 F U E L O I L T A N K N o . 2 F r . 9 – 1 2 P D O U B L E B O T T O M 1

3 0 F U E L O I L T A N K N o . 3 F r . 1 6 – 2 2 C B E L O W E N G I N E R O O M 2

2 0

23

9

2 1

2 32 9

1 8

F i g . 1

1

3 0

2 7

2 6

6

4

5

78

1 0

2 5

F i g . 2

1 1

1 31 9

1 6

2 22 8

1 4

1 5

2 4

1 7

1 2

F i g . 3

L I S T O F C O M P A R T M E N T S O F T H E T W R

S H I P ’ S F O R A N 3 D M O D E L ( 1 o f 2 )

L I S T O F C O M P A R T M E N T S O F T H E T W R S H I P ’ S F O R A N 3 D M O D E L

C O M P A R T M E N T

N U M B E R

D E S C R I P T I O N L O N G .

P O S I T I O N S I

D E S H I P ’ S Z O N E

S e eF i g

3 1 F U E L O I L D A Y T A N K

N o . 4 F r . 2 3 - 2 4 S B E L O W M A I N D E C K 4

3 2 F U E L O I L D A Y T A N K

N o . 5 F r . 2 3 - 2 4 P B E L O W M A I N D E C K 4

3 3 L U B R I C A T I N G O I L

S T O R A G E T A N K F r . 2 3 - 2 3 . 5 P B E L O W M A I N D E C K 4

3 4 W A S T E O I L T A N K F r . 1 4 . 5 - 1 6 C I N S I D E P U M P R O O M 6

3 5 S E W A G E T A N K F r . 1 2 . 5 -

1 3 . 5 C I N S I D E P U M P R O O M 6

3 6 W A S H R O O M , W C &

S H O W E R F r . 9 . 5 - 1 2 P B E L O W M A I N D E C K 5

3 7 P A S S A G E W A Y F r . 8 . 5 -

1 0 . 5 C B E L O W M A I N D E C K 5

3 8 P A S S A G E W A Y F r . 7 - 8 . 5 P - S D E C K H O U S E 4

3 9 S T A I R S F r . 8 - 1 0 . 5 S D E C K H O U S E 4

4 0 E X H A U S T T R U N K - I N -

D E C K H O U S E F r . 1 4 . 5 - 1 5 S D E C K H O U S E 4

4 1 V E N T T R U N K - I N -

S H E L T E R D E C K A R E A ( V E N T I L A T O R ’ S B A S E )

F r . 1 4 . 5 - 1 5 P D E C K H O U S E 5

4 2 S T A I R S F r . 1 3 . 5 - 1 5 S D E C K H O U S E 4

4 3 P A S S A G E W A Y F r . 2 3 - 2 5 C B E L O W M A I N D E C K 4

4 4 C Y L I N D E R L O D G I N G T H E B O W T H R U S T E R

F r . 5 1 / 3 P - S

C I L I N D R I C A L H O L L O W I N S I D E B O W T H R U S T E R

S P A C E

6

4 5

H O L L O W I N S H I P ’ S H U L L - M A I N D E C K

D U E T O T O R P E D O ’ S R A M P

F r . 2 0 . 5 - 2 8 S

O N T O P O F L A Z A R E T T E ,

B A L L A S T T K . N o . 3 , F U E L O I L T A N K

N o . 4 A N D E N G I N E R O O M

5

4 6 E X H A U S T T R U N K -

I N S I D E P U M P R O O M F r . 1 4 . 5 - 1 6 S I N S I D E P U M P R O O M 5

4 7 V E N T T R U N K -

I N S I D E P U M P R O O M F r . 1 4 . 5 - 1 6 P I N S I D E P U M P R O O M 5

3 1

3 2

3 3

3 83 94 2

4 34 0

F i g . 4

F i g . 5

4 5

4 6

4 74 1

3 6

3 7

4 5

F i g . 6

4 4

3 43 5

L I S T O F C O M P A R T M E N T S O F T H E T W R

S H I P ’ S F O R A N 3 D M O D E L ( 2 o f 2 )

FORAN Ship ArrangementsDetailed Design

Selective STEP Export to LEAPS

SpacesDeck zones

Zones

( P21 AP215-AIM STEP FILE)

Decks and Bulkheads

Details

List of Ship Spaces

Hull Forms

FORAN – ISE4 AP215 STEP Translator

FORAN – ISE4 Import STEP Translator

TRIBON - LEAPS

AP215 – SHIP ARRANGEMENTS

16 May‘06 32

Overview – Transfer to Life Cycle Support

• Transfer construction product model to Life Cycle Support for– Engineering support

• Onboard applications• Distance support• Maintenance aids• Analysis tools

– Decision support / simulation– Logistics support

• Typical deliverables are drawings / documents– Must be re-converted to electronic data– Manual, labor intensive, incomplete process– Integrated Product Model often lost

• ISE information models designed to interoperate and preserve integrated product model – Supports automated, complete process

16 May‘06 33

As-Is Process – Transfer to Life Cycle Support

Life Cycle Support SystemIntegrated

ConstructionProduct Model

Neutral File Geometry (IGES, STEP, ACIS, DXF)

Or Drawings

C&ADrawings

EquipmentArrangement

Drawings

StructuralDrawings

Molded FormModeler

ArrangementsModeler

StructuralModeler

EquipmentModeler

Manual, labor intensive & often incomplete process

16 May‘06 34

ISE Process – Transfer to Life Cycle Support

Life Cycle Support System

Integrated ConstructionProduct Model

AP 216Molded Form

Data

AP 215 Arrangements

Data

AP 218Structural

Data

AP 227 Equipment

Data

Highly automated, integrated, complete process

ISETranslators

ISETranslators

ISETranslators

ISETranslators

Integrated Life CycleProduct Model

16 May‘06 35

Demo Scenario–Transfer to Life Cycle Support

Integrated ConstructionProduct Model

AP 216Molded Form

Data

AP 218Structural

Data

AP 227 Equipment

Data

ISETranslators

ISETranslators

ISETranslators

ISETranslators

Integrated Life CycleProduct Model

ISDP: Integrated Ship Design & Production

IntelliShip

Previous exchange

Compartments created using existing molded forms

ISE exchanges interoperate & preserve product model

AP 215 Arrangements

Data

16 May‘06 36

Electrical Demo Details


ISDP



ModifyArrangement

Repair Shipyard

Steel Processing



Intergraph

Key: = Demonstrated = Not Demonstrated

ElectricalKSS/KM

AAP212P28

AP212P21

DetailDesign

Arrangements

16 May‘06 37

Project Objectives

Exchange and ARCHIVE electrical shipbuilding data using STEP AP212 (developed by the auto industry).

Adopt XML to exchange STEP data.

Lay the groundwork to exchange data between CAD and knowledge-based software systems using STEP.

Leverage existing initiatives in the industry (STEP Part 21, STEP Part 28, STEP AP212, and the Navy XML repository).

Publish project results.

16 May‘06 38

Knowledge Systems Solutions

Knowledge management products and expert system software

Navy (SPAWAR) C4ISR

Ship Shore Installation Design Tool

(SSIDT)

KSS KnowledgeManager

Product to createuser-defined

knowledge bases

Air Force (OC-ALC) SBIR

Knowledge-based reverseengineering & automatic

creation of 3D CAD models

Navy (NAVSEA) SBIR

Knowledge-based retentionof shipbuilding expertise

*

* *

Transition of NSRP STEP translator technology*

16 May‘06 39

Spiral Development

Knowledge-based system STEP XML AP212

TWRLightingTWR

Power Distribution

SystemSpec

FrameworkDesign

Single C4ISREquipment

Single C4ISRCircuit

Full C4ISRSystem

Generic Objects

DesignConfigurator

Integrated Prototype

Component Design File Data

Import

NavyAir Force

Commercial

STEP – Data – Translator

Full Engineering& Design Data Sets

16 May‘06 40

Knowledge Management Demonstration

TWR Power Distribution System

Collect data and information into a knowledge base

Perform calculations and design functions

16 May‘06 41

Electrotechnical Results

Developed Component Design Framework for data translation and archival using STEP AP212.

Knowledge Management (knowledge & rules)

Engineering Data (results)

Created reusable STEP toolsets (mediator stylesheets) for DoN repository.

Tested AP212 with diverse electrotechnical test cases.

Demonstrated the joint use of STEP and XML with new programming resources.

16 May‘06 42

Electrotechnical Future

– Continued joint service implementation and benefit.

– ISE4 follow-on project• Facilitates detailed engineering along with early

conceptual electrical engineering.

• Integrates knowledge management with 2D and 3D CAD via STEP formatted files.

– Automatically generate knowledge bases from existing CAD data elements.

16 May‘06 43

Engineering Analysis Demo Details

DetailedDesign Stage

NGSS, Intergraph

EBCElectrical

Concept & Preliminary Design Engineering

FEA Analysis

XSLTs

NGSS, Intergraph

EBC

ADAPT

AP218P28

AP209P21

ISDP

Steel Processing


DetailDesign

Arrangements

16 May‘06 44

Engineering Analysis Project

ISE-4

16 May‘06 45

AP218: Ship Structures

L

16 May‘06 46

Configuration Control, Approvals

• Part, product definitions

• Finite element analysis model, controls, and results

Configuration Control, Approvals

• Part, product definitions

• Finite element analysis model, controls, and results

Analysis Discipline Product Definitions

• Finite Element Analysis–Model (Nodes, Elements, Properties,...)–Controls (Loads, Boundary Constraints,...)

–Results (Displacements, Stresses,...)

• Analysis Report

Analysis Discipline Product Definitions

• Finite Element Analysis–Model (Nodes, Elements, Properties,...)–Controls (Loads, Boundary Constraints,...)

–Results (Displacements, Stresses,...)

• Analysis Report

Design Discipline Product Definition

• Shape Representations

• Assemblies

Design Discipline Product Definition

• Shape Representations

• Assemblies

Information Shared Between Analysis & Design

• 3D Shape Representations

• Composite Constituents

• Material Specifications & Properties

• Part Definitions

Information Shared Between Analysis & Design

• 3D Shape Representations

• Composite Constituents

• Material Specifications & Properties

• Part Definitions

Composite Constituents

• Ply Boundaries, Surfaces

• Laminate Stacking Tables

• Reinforcement Orientation

Composite Constituents

• Ply Boundaries, Surfaces

• Laminate Stacking Tables

• Reinforcement Orientation

Material Specifications & Properties

• Composites

• Homogeneous (metallics)

Material Specifications & Properties

• Composites

• Homogeneous (metallics)

3D Shape Representation

• AP202/203 Commonality Plus Composite Specific 3D Shapes

– Advanced B-Representation– Faceted B-Representation– Manifold Surfaces With Topology– Wireframe & Surface without Topology– Wireframe Geometry with Topology– Composite Constituent Shape Representation

3D Shape Representation

• AP202/203 Commonality Plus Composite Specific 3D Shapes

– Advanced B-Representation– Faceted B-Representation– Manifold Surfaces With Topology– Wireframe & Surface without Topology– Wireframe Geometry with Topology– Composite Constituent Shape Representation

AP209: Composite & Metallic Structural Analysis & Related Design

R

16 May‘06 47

Engines are Supported on Outboard and

Inboard Girders

TWR Engine Room

Twin Caterpillar Diesel Propulsion

EnginesFuel Oil Tank Top

R

16 May‘06 48

Selected TWR Engine Room Solid Model Geometry with Port

Caterpillar Engine

Partial Design Change - Additional Brackets Inserted at FR 17 & FR 19

TWR Engine Room

L

16 May‘06 49

Selected TWR Engine Room Solid Model Geometry with Port

Caterpillar Engine

TWR Engine Room

R

16 May‘06 50

Port-Side Outboard Girder - Solid Model

Geometry for Analysis

TWR Engine Room Fuel Oil Tank & Engine Support Structure

Shown in Intergraph’s ISDP Software

Demo Geometry in ISDP

L

16 May‘06 51

Port-Side Outboard Girder - Solid Model Geometry

Outboard Girder – Mid-Surface Shell Geometry for Analysis

Demo Geometry

Nominal (CAD) and Idealized (Analysis) Geometry in EB’s ADAPT code

L

16 May‘06 52

Outboard Girder – Shell Finite Element Analysis Model

6 “G” Simulated Shock Loads Applied in Vertical and Athwartship Directions

Shock Stress FE Analysis Model

L

16 May‘06 53

Analysis 2

Outboard Girder – With Intermediate Brackets at

Frames 17, 18, and 19

Analysis 1

Outboard Girder – With Single Intermediate Bracket at Frame 18

For the Simulated Athwartship Shock Loading, Adding the

Additional Brackets Results in an Eight-Fold Reduction in

Von Mises Stress Level

Shock Stress FE Analysis Result

L

16 May‘06 54

Steel Processing Demo Details


ISDP



Feed Mfg from ISDP

ModifyArrangement

Partnership Yard

Repair ShipyardGDEB NGSS

Steel Processing



DetailDesign

Intergraph

Key: = Demonstrated = Not Demonstrated

Electrical

AP218P28

Arrangements

16 May‘06 55

Objectives/Scope

• General Objectives (from NSRP SIP)– Decouple CAM from CAD – Enable efficient partnering among yards

• Project Scope– Create a framework for defining manufacturing

rules/processes– Develop a Yard-Neutral Mfg Model (STEP AP218)

• Suitable for work package definition

• Make recommended enhancements to specification as required

– Apply manufacturing rules to generate a manufacturing product model that respects the requirements of a given yard

16 May‘06 56

Usage Scenario S

hip

yard

A

Shop B

STEP 218STEP 218

Sh

ipya

rd B

Shop A

STEP 218 STEP 218

CAD(Detailed Design)

Steel Processor(Lofting/

Mfg Engineering)

Steel Processor(Lofting/

Mfg Engineering)

Mfg Rules

Mfg Rules

16 May‘06 57

Mfg Product Model

Shell Plate Design

CAD

Develop Flat Plate

Specialized Macro

Add Excess Stock for Rolling

Manufacturing Rule

Adjust Size for Weld Shrinkage

Manufacturing Rule

Yard Processes and Assembly Plan

Add Edge Prep & Punch-marking

Sourc

ePro

cess

ManufacturingDesign

16 May‘06 58

Rules Application

• Data Creation– Creation of manufacturing data based on the input data and rules

– Examples• Feature definition (edge preps, added/removed mat’l)

• Annotation creation and positioning

• Process definition

• Data extractions for post-processing applications (reports, mfg aids, nesting)

• Data Verification– Check the data for conformance to a set of yard-specific processes, geometry

correctness (e.g., closed parts), consistency, and produce-ability

– Examples• Data integrity (content, structure, associations)

• Geometry correctness

• Structural part relationships

• Correlation of processes applied to structural data

16 May‘06 59

Demonstration Example

Deck Plates

Bulkhead

16 May‘06 60

Yard-Specific Annotation Ex.

Thickness Throw Indicator(Northrop Grumman Ship Systems)

Thickness Throw Indicator(General Dynamics Electric Boat)

Stiffener

Marking Line

16 May‘06 61

Demonstration ScenarioN

ort

hro

p G

rum

man

Avo

nd

ale

Shop B

STEP 218

Gen

eral

Dyn

amic

sE

lect

ric

Bo

at

Shop A

Launch Demo

STEP 218

1

2

ISDPISDP Steel ProcessorSteel Processor

Steel ProcessorSteel Processor

1Apply manufacturing rules for NG Avondale

2Apply manufacturing rules for GD Electric Boat

STEP 218

Mfg Rules

STEP 218

Mfg Rules

16 May‘06 62

Benefits of Approach - Steel Processing

• Explicit definition and application of rules to structural data– Maintained separate from design/lofting systems– Streamline manufacturing product model creation

and verification

• Evolution of ship structural standards– Use STEP specifications as the native

import/export format and as a framework for the internal structure

16 May‘06 63

ISE Summary

16 May‘06 64

NSRP ISE AccomplishmentsNSRP ISE Accomplishments

National consensus architecture for product data interoperability

Published 100’s of industry use cases defining requirements for information sharing

Developed consensus data element definitions and consensus taxonomy for communicating product data across the enterprise

Developed tools and demonstrated feasibility for interoperability of :– Structure & Piping (March 2000 to December 2003)– HVAC & CPC Interfaces (October 2003 to October 2004)– Current Project (April 2005 – July 2006)

• Ship Compartmentation • Engineering Analysis• Electrical• Steel Processing with Rules Processing

Developed Information Models based on STEP Verified that the above meet requirements of U.S. shipyards and work with currently

available CAD tools Published Implementors Agreements to enable others to use these tools effectively Registered ISE Schemas with the DONXML Repository Identified proposed changes/corrections to ISO STEP Standards Created a Website to contain the relevant software tools, schemas, etc. as provided by

the ISE Project• www.isetools.org

Result of this approachResult of this approach: : Product Data Interoperability Standards are Substantially CompleteProduct Data Interoperability Standards are Substantially Complete

16 May‘06 65

Information Interoperability Roadmap

Ship Product Model Data

Ship Structural Envelope

Distribution Systems

Equipment / Subsystems

Life Cycle Maintenance

Miscellaneous

HVACISO AP 227:2005

PipingISO AP 227:2005

Ship ArrangementISO AP 215:2004

Ship Moulded FormsISO AP 216:2003

Ship StructuresISO AP 218:2004

Reference Data Libraries

ISO 15926

Common Parts Catalog (CPC)

Mechanical SystemsISO AP 227:2005

Cable TraysISO AP 227:2005

Finite Element Analysis

ISO AP 209:2001

Product Config/ Geometry

ISO AP 203:1994

Systems EngineeringISO AP 233

Computational Fluid DynamicsISO AP 237

Logistics / SparesISO AP 232:2002

Outfit & FurnishingsNSRP 0428:1992

Manufacturing Support

ISO APs 224, 238, 240

Standard Approved

Information Model


Testing Framework

Deployment, integration,testing

Standard In Work

Product Life Cycle SupportISO AP 239

ElectricalISO AP 212:2001

Note: Circled boxes have been addressed under the ISE Project

16 May‘06 66

Continuing Efforts

• An ISE4 Follow-On Project was awarded for 2006: – Electrical: Finish task including addition of 3D information– Program Management: Continue support and involvement of

ISO and DONXML activities

• An ISE Systems Technology Panel Project was awarded for 2006:– Steel Processing: Continue efforts with emphasis on STEP-NC

• Future Projects: Complete the Information Interoperability Roadmap– Goal is to turn all boxes “Blue”– ISE Project is providing tools to turn boxes from “Red” to

“Yellow” and then to “Green”– Customer must invoke Requirements on Contracts in order to

get these tools Implemented in Production

16 May‘06 67

Next Steps

• NSRP: Finish Remaining Standards (as resources allow)

and work with the Navy to ….

• Navy: Create the business pull– Define Navy Shipbuilding Enterprise plan for standards-based product

data acquisition & use• Throughout design, construction and service life• Standard contract clauses • Through-life archival & access approach

• Shipyards – Move toward modular IPDE architecture with standards-base interfaces– Clarify marginal costs to package and deliver digital data– Demand standards-based translators from software vendors– Capitalize on business opportunities enabled by interoperability

Business considerations and cultural barriers are Business considerations and cultural barriers are more significant than technical issuesmore significant than technical issues

16 May‘06 68

Conclusions• These testing, modeling, and simulation efforts are part of

an attempt to develop a suite of product model data exchange tools that will enable U.S. shipyards to become more productive

• These efforts revolve around implementation of the ISO 10303 STEP Shipbuilding standards and XML technology

• The APs that enable these exchanges have completed their development and approval as International Standards

• The primary focus has shifted to testing and validating their implementations

ISE Tools Enable Interoperability between Shipyards and Reduce the Life Cycle Cost of Ships

16 May‘06 69

• Two major challenges lie ahead of us:– Commercialization of this technology

– Continuing to prototype standards based data exchange in other application areas

• In order to increase the availability and lower the price of production ready tools:– The ship owner / operator needs to insist that data be delivered in a system

neutral format

– The shipbuilder needs to insist that STEP functionality be an integral part of computer software products

• The next challenge is to move this technology into the mainstream and insure that the technology is mature enough to transition into commercial CAD, CAE, CAM, and PDM products

Challenges

16 May‘06 70

Summary

• Enabling interoperability is a major challenge in achieving the goals of NSRP

• Achieving these goals will have a major impact on reducing the cost of ships

• The ISE Project is attacking these problems in many different disciplines and environments

• Although ISE has been very successful, much work remains to achieve our goals

16 may06 1 integrated shipbuilding environment 4 (ise 4) demonstration overview presentation for...

Documents

interoperability slide

program slide

complete slide

information engineering

major program

representative slide

significant challenge

program requirements