16 darroux
TRANSCRIPT
Exploring integrated approaches to cultural landscapes Current strategies, problems and poten7al
– iron age oppida as a case study –
Cultural landscapes in the making : Proposal for a collabora8v research
Caroline Darroux, Karine Basset, Mélanie Duval, Véronique Peyrache-‐Gadeau, Mari Oiry-‐Varacca
,
This work has been supported by the LABEX ITEM ANR-‐10-‐LABX-‐50-‐01 “InvesBssements d’avenir”
Introduction
• Cultural landscape, a new concept connected with territorial labelling issues
• PerspecBves : – To develop a global approach of the heritage process – To focus on the landscape construcBon dynamics as an heritage object
• Aims of this workshop and our communicaBon: what is behind this cultural landscape heritage process ? Based on which landscape ideas? In order to serve which kind of interests? Which are the stakes and the main stakeholders involved in these dynamics ?
Presentation
• The Research program « CriBcal approaches of the processes of labelling in territorial project » (Labex Item – research network on the mountain territories)
• MulBdisciplinary team of researchers (geography, history, anthropology, territorial economy, urbanism, sociology)
• Different fieldworks in mountains areas (Alpine Protected areas, Mediterranean mountains, and the Massif Central)
• Differents partnerships in these fiedlworks in parBcular with EPCC Bibracte and the PNR Morvan
Perspectives of the Research Program
• To understand the social process of territorial disBnctnes through places and landscapes
• To analyze the rising tensions between : – quest of uniqueness and normalizing procedure – protecBon and development – cultural heritage and natural environment
• To analyze and experiment with the co-‐producBon of sciences and knowledges in the context of territorial projects
Triple choice which was made:
-‐ Monumental versus landscaped approach -‐ Cultural versus mixed World Heritage site -‐ Cave versus serial property
Case study in France, Chauvet Cave World Heritage Inscrip9on Process : A monumental approach versus a landscaped approach
Property finally inscribed on the World Heritage list : cave perimeter as a core zone (red circle), with the protected area “Pont d’ Arc” as a buffer zone (orange circle) ; will and wish to limit the conflicts between the various stakeholders involved in the management of this heritage and tourist area.
-‐ In a marginalized area: reflecBons on a future recogniBon of agropastoralism as a cultural landscape
-‐ Making Landscape the heart of a territorial project Ø Difficult to work all together for a collecBve project
Case study in Moroccan High-‐Atlas : Aït Bouguemez valley
M. Oiry and S. Jaillet 2013
Recognize the very singular link between the local human community and her environment, from the bofom of the valley to the high mountain pastures. M. Oiry 2011
Shared vision for a landscape project
-‐workshops with Pnr Morvan and EPCC Bibracte technicians: what sort of land do you care?
-‐farmers, individual and collecBve meeBng: what about landscape in your daily labor? -‐« EntreBens de Bibracte »: public discussion about landscape -‐study trip in Bruche Valley
ScienBfic support of ITEM: -‐to complicate noBon of « local » -‐ParBcipaBon in concentric circles
Collaborative research method to analyse distincnes process facilitating communities engagement in
Mont Beuvray
-‐co-‐producBon of sciences and knowledges: pragmaBc anthropology protocol, restoring research to stakeholders, make allowance for local knowledges and pracBces in landscape project. -‐coordinated invesBgaBons (landscape diagnosBcs, doctoral thesis, post-‐doctoral research)
Thank you for your afenBon