15 september 2003 smc fall policy meeting treelab (v1.0) variable-density yield simulator for...

29
15 September 200 15 September 200 3 SMC Fall Policy Meeting SMC Fall Policy Meeting TreeLab (v1.0) TreeLab (v1.0) Variable-density Yield Variable-density Yield Simulator for Immature, Simulator for Immature, Managed Stands of Managed Stands of Douglas-fir Douglas-fir Sam D. Pittman Sam D. Pittman Eric C. Turnblom Eric C. Turnblom

Post on 20-Dec-2015

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

15 September 200315 September 2003 SMC Fall Policy MeetingSMC Fall Policy Meeting

TreeLab (v1.0)TreeLab (v1.0)Variable-density Yield Variable-density Yield

Simulator for Immature, Simulator for Immature, Managed Stands of Douglas-Managed Stands of Douglas-

fir fir

Sam D. PittmanSam D. Pittman

Eric C. TurnblomEric C. Turnblom

15 September 200315 September 2003 SMC Fall Policy MeetingSMC Fall Policy Meeting

TreeLab – TopicsTreeLab – Topics

Introduction / backgroundIntroduction / background

Model / TheoryModel / Theory

Operation / OutputOperation / Output

Results / Discussion Results / Discussion

Conclusions / QuestionsConclusions / Questions

15 September 200315 September 2003 SMC Fall Policy MeetingSMC Fall Policy Meeting

TreeLab - IntroductionTreeLab - Introduction

Early Growth & Development of Immature, Early Growth & Development of Immature, Managed Stands of Douglas-firManaged Stands of Douglas-fir

Basically targeted the use of Type I and II Basically targeted the use of Type I and II installations to develop variable-density, installations to develop variable-density, managed stand growth & yield tables managed stand growth & yield tables

TreeLab is a variable-density, managed TreeLab is a variable-density, managed stand simulator fit to all Type I and II datastand simulator fit to all Type I and II data

15 September 200315 September 2003 SMC Fall Policy MeetingSMC Fall Policy Meeting

TreeLab - Introduction (2)TreeLab - Introduction (2) Turnblom, E.C. and T.E. Burk. 2000. Modeling Turnblom, E.C. and T.E. Burk. 2000. Modeling

self-thinning of unthinned Lake States red pine self-thinning of unthinned Lake States red pine stands using nonlinear simultaneous differential stands using nonlinear simultaneous differential equations. Can. J. For. Res. 30: 1410 -1418 equations. Can. J. For. Res. 30: 1410 -1418

Pittman, S.D. and E.C. Turnblom. 2003. A study Pittman, S.D. and E.C. Turnblom. 2003. A study of self-thinning using coupled allometric of self-thinning using coupled allometric equations: implications for coastal Douglas-fir equations: implications for coastal Douglas-fir stand dynamics. Can. J. For. Res. 33:1662 -1669stand dynamics. Can. J. For. Res. 33:1662 -1669

The model in TreeLab extends the previous work The model in TreeLab extends the previous work by including the simulation of fertilization and by including the simulation of fertilization and thinning treatment regimesthinning treatment regimes

15 September 200315 September 2003 SMC Fall Policy MeetingSMC Fall Policy Meeting

TreeLab – Model TheoryTreeLab – Model Theory

Every stand has a unique self-thinning Every stand has a unique self-thinning trajectory boundary driven by its unique trajectory boundary driven by its unique stand allometrystand allometry

Stand allometry is dynamic, not static; Stand allometry is dynamic, not static; allometric relationships change with stage allometric relationships change with stage of developmentof development

Dynamic allometry is captured through Dynamic allometry is captured through simultaneous, coupled rate equationssimultaneous, coupled rate equations

15 September 200315 September 2003 SMC Fall Policy MeetingSMC Fall Policy Meeting

TreeLab – Model Theory (2)TreeLab – Model Theory (2) The rate at which a stand variable changes is The rate at which a stand variable changes is

found by differencing gross growth & found by differencing gross growth & respiration (anabolic & catabolic processes, respiration (anabolic & catabolic processes, respectively)respectively)

The magnitudes of the anabolic and catabolic The magnitudes of the anabolic and catabolic processes depend on the current state of the processes depend on the current state of the stand and is affected by site quality stand and is affected by site quality

The current state of the stand can be The current state of the stand can be described by the triplet (stand basal area, described by the triplet (stand basal area, quadratic mean DBH, and dominant height)quadratic mean DBH, and dominant height)

15 September 200315 September 2003 SMC Fall Policy MeetingSMC Fall Policy Meeting

TreeLab –Model Theory (3)TreeLab –Model Theory (3)

For TreeLab, the site quality rate For TreeLab, the site quality rate adjustment factor was modified to allow for adjustment factor was modified to allow for fertilization and any interaction between fertilization and any interaction between the two:the two:

15 September 200315 September 2003 SMC Fall Policy MeetingSMC Fall Policy Meeting

TreeLab – Operation / TreeLab – Operation / OutputOutput

Conventional “Windows” interface Conventional “Windows” interface giving Point & click operation giving Point & click operation

How to define stand parameters and How to define stand parameters and treatment actionstreatment actions

How to print and / or save yield table How to print and / or save yield table outputoutput

15 September 200315 September 2003 SMC Fall Policy MeetingSMC Fall Policy Meeting

15 September 200315 September 2003 SMC Fall Policy MeetingSMC Fall Policy Meeting

15 September 200315 September 2003 SMC Fall Policy MeetingSMC Fall Policy Meeting

15 September 200315 September 2003 SMC Fall Policy MeetingSMC Fall Policy Meeting

15 September 200315 September 2003 SMC Fall Policy MeetingSMC Fall Policy Meeting

15 September 200315 September 2003 SMC Fall Policy MeetingSMC Fall Policy Meeting

15 September 200315 September 2003 SMC Fall Policy MeetingSMC Fall Policy Meeting

15 September 200315 September 2003 SMC Fall Policy MeetingSMC Fall Policy Meeting

15 September 200315 September 2003 SMC Fall Policy MeetingSMC Fall Policy Meeting

15 September 200315 September 2003 SMC Fall Policy MeetingSMC Fall Policy Meeting

15 September 200315 September 2003 SMC Fall Policy MeetingSMC Fall Policy Meeting

15 September 200315 September 2003 SMC Fall Policy MeetingSMC Fall Policy Meeting

15 September 200315 September 2003 SMC Fall Policy MeetingSMC Fall Policy Meeting

15 September 200315 September 2003 SMC Fall Policy MeetingSMC Fall Policy Meeting

15 September 200315 September 2003 SMC Fall Policy MeetingSMC Fall Policy Meeting

TreeLab – Results / TreeLab – Results / DiscussionDiscussion

Three example treatment regimes: 1) do Three example treatment regimes: 1) do nothing, 2) thinning RD55 -> RD35, and 3) nothing, 2) thinning RD55 -> RD35, and 3) fertilizing every twenty years, beginning in fertilizing every twenty years, beginning in first year; two initial conditions:first year; two initial conditions:

15 September 200315 September 2003 SMC Fall Policy MeetingSMC Fall Policy Meeting

TreeLab – Results / TreeLab – Results / DiscussionDiscussion

Low site QMD evolution:Low site QMD evolution:

15 September 200315 September 2003 SMC Fall Policy MeetingSMC Fall Policy Meeting

TreeLab – Results / TreeLab – Results / DiscussionDiscussion

Low site (derived) TPA evolution:Low site (derived) TPA evolution:

15 September 200315 September 2003 SMC Fall Policy MeetingSMC Fall Policy Meeting

TreeLab – Results / TreeLab – Results / DiscussionDiscussion

High site BA evolution:High site BA evolution:

15 September 200315 September 2003 SMC Fall Policy MeetingSMC Fall Policy Meeting

TreeLab – Results / TreeLab – Results / DiscussionDiscussion

High site H40 evolution:High site H40 evolution:

15 September 200315 September 2003 SMC Fall Policy MeetingSMC Fall Policy Meeting

TreeLab – ConclusionTreeLab – Conclusion Model propositionsModel propositions

Unique self-thinning boundary for each standUnique self-thinning boundary for each stand

Stand allometry is dynamic, not staticStand allometry is dynamic, not static

Changes in stand attributes are represented as a Changes in stand attributes are represented as a coupled system of rate equations that govern coupled system of rate equations that govern allometryallometry

Uses all Type I and II data including fertilization Uses all Type I and II data including fertilization and thinning available through growth year 2000and thinning available through growth year 2000

Output consistent with range of data spannedOutput consistent with range of data spanned

15 September 200315 September 2003 SMC Fall Policy MeetingSMC Fall Policy Meeting

TreeLab – ConclusionTreeLab – Conclusion

Please visit <http:://www.standmgt.org/>Please visit <http:://www.standmgt.org/>

To download, click on the TREELAB link To download, click on the TREELAB link (LHS)(LHS)

DiscussionDiscussion

Eric C. Turnblom <[email protected]>Eric C. Turnblom <[email protected]>