15 free radical scavenging (dpph) potential in nine mentha species

Upload: mehreen-zaka

Post on 07-Mar-2016

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

2012 Research

TRANSCRIPT

  • http://tih.sagepub.com/Toxicology and Industrial Health

    http://tih.sagepub.com/content/28/1/83The online version of this article can be found at:

    DOI: 10.1177/0748233711407238 2012 28: 83 originally published online 6 June 2011Toxicol Ind Health

    Nisar Ahmad, Hina Fazal, Iftikhar Ahmad and Bilal Haider AbbasiFree radical scavenging (DPPH) potential in nine Mentha species

    Published by:

    http://www.sagepublications.com

    can be found at:Toxicology and Industrial HealthAdditional services and information for

    http://tih.sagepub.com/cgi/alertsEmail Alerts:

    http://tih.sagepub.com/subscriptionsSubscriptions:

    http://www.sagepub.com/journalsReprints.navReprints:

    http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.navPermissions:

    http://tih.sagepub.com/content/28/1/83.refs.htmlCitations:

    What is This?

    - Jun 6, 2011 OnlineFirst Version of Record

    - Jan 27, 2012Version of Record >>

    at UNIV OF FLORIDA Smathers Libraries on September 5, 2013tih.sagepub.comDownloaded from

  • Free radical scavenging (DPPH)potential in nine Mentha species

    Nisar Ahmad1,2, Hina Fazal3,4, Iftikhar Ahmad2, andBilal Haider Abbasi1

    AbstractMentha species are used in every day life in various food items. These species produce valuable secondarymetabolites that scavenge toxic free radicals. Toxic free radicals can cause different diseases in the humanbody. In the present study free radical scavenging potential (1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl scavenging activity)in nine Mentha species were investigated to evaluate and explore new potential sources for natural antioxi-dants. The activity was performed after different time intervals with incubation period of 30 minutes. Themethanolic extracts revealed that significantly higher activity (82%) was observed in Mentha suaveolens, fol-lowed byMentha longifolia (79%),Mentha officinalis (76%) andMentha piperita,Mentha pulegium,Mentha royleana(75%), respectively. Significantly same activity was observed inMentha arvensis andMentha spicata. Lower activ-ity was observed in Mentha citrata (64%). The present study revealed that these species can be used as naturalantioxidants.

    KeywordsFree radical scavenging activity, antioxidant, Mentha species, DPPH

    Introduction

    The active ingredients of a medicinal plant are mainly

    its secondary metabolites, among which is the

    phenolic compound that is an important antioxidant

    (Huda-Faujan et al., 2009; Khanavi et al., 2009). These

    ingredients are naturally produced during a plants

    growth metabolic process, the active substances with

    antioxidant function such as scavenging reactive

    oxygen species, free radicals (hydroxyl radicals, OHand superoxide anion radicals, O2) or non-free radi-cal reactive oxygen species (peroxide, H2O2) produc-

    tion from body metabolism (Ramarathnam et al.,

    1995). Natural antioxidants are known to exhibit a wide

    range of biological effects, including antibacterial,

    antiviral, anti-inflammatory, anti-allergic, antithrombo-

    tic and vasodilatory activity (Cook and Samman, 1996;

    Liyana-Pathirana andShahidi, 2006). In recent develop-

    ments, it has been recorded that free radicals are

    involved in causing many diseases (Ames et al., 1993).

    For instance unsaturated fatty acids in the biomembranes

    are attackedby free radicals causing lipid peroxidation in

    membranes, a decrease in membrane fluidity, loss of

    enzymes and receptor activity and damage to mem-

    brane proteins leading to cell inactivation (Dean and

    Davies, 1993). Free radicals also attack DNA and

    cause mutation leading to cancer. For these reasons

    antioxidants are of interest for the treatment of many

    kinds of cellular degeneration (Tutour, 1990).

    Restriction on the use of synthetic antioxidants has

    been imposed, because of their carcinogenicity

    (Bronen, 1975). Thus, the interest in natural antioxi-

    dants has been increased considerably. As compared

    to other antioxidants much attention has been paid to

    plants (Couladis et al., 2003).Especially, the antioxidants

    present in edible plants have recently been considered

    1Department of Biotechnology, Faculty of Biological Sciences,Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad, Pakistan2Nuclear Institute for Food and Agriculture (NIFA), Peshawar,Pakistan3Department of Plant Sciences, Faculty of Biological Sciences,Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad, Pakistan4Pakistan Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (PCSIR)Laboratories Complex, Peshawar, Pakistan

    Corresponding author:Nisar Ahmad, Department of Biotechnology, Faculty of BiologicalSciences, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad 45320, PakistanEmail: [email protected]

    Toxicology and Industrial Health28(1) 8389 The Author(s) 2012Reprints and permission:sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.navDOI: 10.1177/0748233711407238tih.sagepub.com

    at UNIV OF FLORIDA Smathers Libraries on September 5, 2013tih.sagepub.comDownloaded from

  • as food additives (Fukuda et al., 1990). Several

    methods have been developed to evaluate the total

    antioxidant activity of fruits or other plants and animal

    tissues. One of the methods is the 1,1-diphenyl-2-

    picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) assay, which can accommodate

    a large number of samples in a short periodof time and is

    sensitive enough to detect natural compounds at low

    concentrations so it was used in the present study for the

    primary screening of antioxidants (Benzie and Strain,

    1996; Cao and Prior, 1999; Evelson et al., 2001;

    Ou et al., 2001; Van den Berg et al., 1999).

    The objective of the current study is to evaluate the

    free radical scavenging activity (FRSA) (DPPH activ-

    ity) of nine Mentha species to find new potential

    sources of natural antioxidants, which were subjected

    to extraction using methanol as a solvent and to com-

    pare their highest antioxidant potential in each specie.

    Materials and methods

    Plant materials

    Nine of the Mentha species of family Lamiaceae, that

    is, Mentha arvensis, Mentha citrata, Mentha longifo-

    lia,Mentha officinalis,Mentha piperita,Mentha pule-

    gium, Mentha royleana, Mentha spicata and Mentha

    suaveolens were collected from different localities

    (Swat, Bunir, Khanpur, Haripur, Abottabad, Islamabad

    and Peshawar) of Pakistan from 2008 to 2009. These

    plants were identified by the experts of the Department

    of Plant Sciences, Quaid-i-AzamUniversity, Islamabad

    and the Medicinal Botanical Centre PCSIR Complex,

    Peshawar, Pakistan.

    Preparation of the extract

    Dried plant materials were ground and sieved to a fine

    powder from which the extracts were prepared.

    Methanolic extract of the plant was obtained by tak-

    ing 10 g of powdered material in a separate container.

    With this 50 ml of methanol was added and kept for

    1 week with periodic shaking (the soaked material

    was stirred every 18 h using a sterilized glass rod),

    filtered and the filtrate was collected. This procedure

    was repeated three times with fresh volume of metha-

    nol. The filtrates were pooled. The final extracts were

    passed throughWhatman filter paper No. 1 (Whatman

    Ltd., England). The pooled methanol extracts were

    concentrated separately by rotary vacuum evaporator

    at 40C and evaporated to dryness and stored at 4C inan air tight bottle (Ahmad et al., 2010). The extracts

    obtained from each part were dissolved in methanol

    independently to get stock solutions. The stock

    solution was prepared by dissolving 5 mg of pure

    extract in 20 ml of methanol independently.

    DPPH free radical scavenging activity

    The FRSA of methanolic extracts of nine Mentha

    species was measured in terms of hydrogen donating

    or radical scavenging ability using the stable radical

    DPPH. The test extracts were prepared in methanol

    therefore the DPPH was also prepared in methanol.

    A total of 3.96 mg of DPPH was dissolved in 20 ml

    of methanol to get stock solution. A 0.5 ml of sample

    solution was added to 1 ml of DPPH solution sepa-

    rately. These solution mixtures were kept in dark for

    30 minutes (incubation period) at room temperature.

    Thirty minutes later, the absorbance was measured

    at 517 nm. Lower absorbance of the reaction mixture

    indicated higher FRSA. All tests were carried out in

    triplicate. Finally the radical scavenging activity was

    calculated as percentage of DPPH discoloration using

    the equation;

    % scavenging DPPH free radical 100 1 AE=AD

    Where AE is absorbance of the solution, when

    extract has been added at a particular level and AD

    is the absorbance of the DPPH solution with nothing

    added (blank, without extract).

    Results

    Antioxidant constituents of plant origin are vital

    substances which protect the body from coronary

    diseases and from damage caused by free radical-

    induced oxidative stress. The overall objective of the

    current study was to evaluate the antioxidant activity

    in nine Mentha species. % FRSA in each of nineMentha extracts was performed in time dependent

    manner. The data was recorded in triplicates and the

    mean values are presented in Figures 19.

    Antioxidant activity or FRSA of nine Mentha spe-

    cies of which M. suaveolens had shown significantly

    higher activity to detoxify DPPH free radicals than

    other species (Figure 9). According to our results

    M. suaveolens have higher antioxidant activity

    (82%) as compared to other species of Mentha. Thedata was collected after 10, 20 and 30 minutes to com-

    pare highest antioxidant activity. From the comparison

    it was concluded that at 30 minutes the antioxidant

    activity was highest. M. arvensis detoxify free radical

    after 10, 20 and 30 minutes and showed best

    84 Toxicology and Industrial Health 28(1)

    at UNIV OF FLORIDA Smathers Libraries on September 5, 2013tih.sagepub.comDownloaded from

  • activity (67%, 68% and 70%) after incubation period of30 minutes in the dark. In the present experiment

    M. citrata have 56%, 62% and 64% activity as shownin Figure 2.

    The antioxidant activity recorded for M. longifolia

    ranges from 67%, 75% and 79% (Figure 3), respec-tively. Lamaison et al. (1991) also observed the

    antioxidant activity (LC50 29.0 mcg/ml) in aqueous-

    alcoholic extracts of the shade-dried inflorescence

    of M. longifolia. From the experiment it was con-

    cluded that the plant secondary metabolites scavenge

    more free radicals after 30 minutes than 10 minutes,

    as the time interval and incubation period increases

    the plant extract scavenge more free radicals. Several

    studies suggested that the phenolic compounds con-

    tributed significantly to the antioxidant capacity of

    the 112 wild grown Chinese herbs (Cai et al., 2004).

    The present data are consistent with the findings of

    67.0 67.5 68.0 68.5 69.0 69.5 70.0

    67.0 67.5 68.0 68.5 69.0 69.5 70.0

    Tim

    e in

    terv

    als

    (min

    )

    c

    b

    10

    20

    Free radical scavenging activity (%)

    30a

    Figure 1. Time dependent free radical scavenging activityin Mentha arvensis. Values are means of three replicates.Columns with common letters are not significantly differentat p < 0.05.

    56 58 60 62 64

    56 58 60 62 64

    30

    20

    c

    b

    Tim

    e in

    terv

    als

    (min

    )

    Radical scavenging activity (%)

    a

    10

    Figure 2. Time dependent free radical scavenging activityin Mentha citrata. Values are means of three replicates.Columns with common letters are not significantly differentat p < 0.05.

    66 68 70 72 74 76 78 80

    66 68 70 72 74 76 78 80

    Tim

    e in

    terv

    als

    (min

    )

    10

    20

    30

    c

    b

    Free radical scavenging activity (%)

    a

    Figure 3. Time dependent free radical scavenging activityin Mentha longifolia. Values are means of three replicates.Columns with common letters are not significantly differentat p < 0.05.

    69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77

    69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77T

    ime

    inte

    rval

    s (m

    in)

    10

    20

    30

    c

    b

    Free radical scavenging activity (%)

    a

    Figure 4. Time dependent free radical scavenging activityin Mentha officinalis. Values are means of three replicates.Columns with common letters are not significantly differentat p < 0.05.

    Ahmad et al. 85

    at UNIV OF FLORIDA Smathers Libraries on September 5, 2013tih.sagepub.comDownloaded from

  • many research groups who reported such positive cor-

    relation between total phenolic content and antioxi-

    dant activity (Ahmad et al, 2010; Cai et al., 2004;

    Zheng and Wang, 2001).

    The methanolic extract of M. officinalis shows

    70, 72 and 76% FRSA, respectively (Figure 4), whileM. piperita shows 67, 74 and 75% activity,respectively (Figure 5). Mimica-Dukic in 2004, also

    detemined the antioxidant activity of M. piperita.

    Studies conducted on free radical scavenging or anti-

    oxidant activities of medicinally important plant

    reveal that the efficiency of each plant species differs

    depending on the particular assay methodology,

    reflecting the complexity of the mechanisms

    involved in total antioxidant capacity (Matkowski and

    Piotrowska, 2006). It is suggesting a great complexity

    of the mechanisms involved that can vary even among

    the related species. M. pulegium showed activity in

    66 68 70 72 74 76

    66 68 70 72 74 76

    Tim

    e in

    terv

    als

    (min

    )

    c

    b

    a

    10

    20

    30

    Free radical scavenging activity (%)

    Figure 5. Time dependent free radical scavenging activityin Mentha piperita. Values are means of three replicates.Columns with common letters are not significantly differentat p < 0.05.

    71.5 72.0 72.5 73.0 73.5 74.0 74.5 75.0 75.5

    71.5 72.0 72.5 73.0 73.5 74.0 74.5 75.0 75.5

    Tim

    e in

    terv

    als

    (min

    )

    c

    b

    a

    10

    20

    30

    Free radical scavenging activity (%)

    Figure 6. Time dependent free radical scavenging activityin Mentha pulegium. Values are means of three replicates.Columns with common letters are not significantly differentat p < 0.05.

    62 64 66 68 70 72 74 76

    62 64 66 68 70 72 74 76

    Tim

    e in

    terv

    als

    (min

    )

    c

    b

    a

    10

    20

    30

    Free radical scavenging activity (%)

    Figure 7. Time dependent free radical scavengingactivity in M. royleana. Values are means of three replicates.Columns with common letters are not significantly differentat p < 0.05.

    60 62 64 66 68 70 72

    60 62 64 66 68 70 72T

    ime

    inte

    rval

    s (m

    in)

    c

    b

    a

    10

    20

    30

    Free radical scavenging activity (%)

    Figure 8. Time dependent free radical scavenging activityin Mentha spicata. Values are means of three replicates.Columns with common letters are not significantly differentat p < 0.05.

    86 Toxicology and Industrial Health 28(1)

    at UNIV OF FLORIDA Smathers Libraries on September 5, 2013tih.sagepub.comDownloaded from

  • order of 72%, 73% and 75% as shown in Figure 6. M.pulegium antioxidant activity was also determined by

    Souria et al. (2004). In this study it was observed that

    M. royleana have 63%, 68% and 75% activity. Thedata on antioxidant activity recorded for M. spicata

    was 61%, 64% and 71%, respectively (Figure 8;M. spicata extract has been found to have antioxidant

    and antiperoxidant properties due to the presence of

    eugenol, caffeic acid, rosmarinic acid and a-tocopheroland it could enhance error-free repair for DNA damage

    and hence could be antimutagenic. (AI-Sereiti et al.,

    1999; Vokovic-Gacis and Simic, 1993).M. suaveolens

    one the potential specie for natural antioxidant, it

    showed 79%, 81% and 82% activity in the presentstudy. M. suaveolens showed appreciable antioxidant

    activity only in the polar fractions and its decoction

    was also very effective in the inhibition of AChE and

    as a scavenger of radicals (Ferreira et al., 2006).

    Natural antioxidant substances are considered to be

    safe since they occur in plant foods, and are seen as

    more desirable than their synthetic counterparts. From

    the current data it was summarized that these Mentha

    species contain a large variety of metabolites that

    possess antioxidant activity.

    Discussion and conclusion

    Many species of the Mentha family have been

    experimentally studied and the efficiency of some tra-

    ditional applications was confirmed by many workers.

    According to the literature cited different Mentha

    species are used for rheumatism, dysentery, dyspepsia,

    skin allergies, stimulant, chills, jaundice, throat infec-

    tions, diaphoretic, diuretic, reconstituent, stomach

    tonic, constipation, spasm, bladder stone, gall stone,

    jaundice, diarrhoea, toothache, stomachache, anti-

    infection, dyspnea, flatulence, gastrodynia, sedative,

    insect repellent, cholagogue antimycobacterial, anti-

    fungal, anti-allergic, virucidal, radioprotective,

    cyclooxygenase inhibitor, anti-inflammatory and

    haemostatic (Naghibi et al., 2005).

    The aerial parts of Mentha species are commonly

    used in commercial spice mixtures for many

    processed foods as well as in herbal teas, flavour

    liqueurs, breads, salads, soups and cheese, as well as

    an ingredient of cosmetics (Kofidis et al., 2006;

    Moreno et al., 2002; Yadegarinia et al., 2006). In

    addition these have been utilized traditionally for

    the treatment of many digestive tract diseases due to its

    carminative, antiemetic spasmodic, analgesic and anti-

    inflammatory attributes (Gulluce et al., 2007; Moreno

    et al., 2002). The essential oils of some Mentha species

    viz: M. arvensis, M. piperita, M. longifolia and

    M. spicata are potential candidates for exhibiting anti-

    microbial, antioxidant and radical scavenging activities

    (Dorman et al., 2003; Gulluce et al., 2007; Kaur and

    Kapoor, 2002; Pandey et al., 2003), which are mainly

    attributed to the presence of phenolic substances

    (Hosseinimehr et al., 2007).

    Nine Mentha dry materials were subjected to

    extraction with solvent methanol. Highest antioxidant

    potential was found in the extract of M. suaveolens

    followed by other eight species. From the experiment

    it was observed that these plants have certain impor-

    tant constituents such as essential oil, phenolics, and

    so on which is responsible for radical scavenging

    activity. Mentha species prevent cell damage through

    its strong antioxidant activity, by scavenging free

    radicals and neutralizing toxic invaders. It also pro-

    motes the release of superoxide dismutase, a powerful

    antioxidant especially potent in destroying free radi-

    cals caused by imbalanced oxidation. Radical scaven-

    ging activity was observed when discoloration

    occurred. M. suaveolens were observed to have high

    discoloration followed by M. longifolia, M. officina-

    lis,M. piperita,M. pulegium,M. royleana,M. spicata,

    M. arvensis and M. citrate, respectively.

    When the difference in the results was high

    between the DPPH solution and sample, the percent

    free radical activity is high or the sample had high

    potential to scavenge the free radical of DPPH. This

    study reveals that the tested plant materials have

    79.0 79.5 80.0 80.5 81.0 81.5 82.0 82.5

    79.0 79.5 80.0 80.5 81.0 81.5 82.0 82.5

    Tim

    e in

    terv

    als

    (min

    )

    c

    b

    a

    10

    20

    30

    Free radical scavenging activity (%)

    Figure 9. Time dependent free radical scavenging activityin Mentha suaveolens. Values are means of three replicates.Columns with common letters are not significantly differentat p < 0.05.

    Ahmad et al. 87

    at UNIV OF FLORIDA Smathers Libraries on September 5, 2013tih.sagepub.comDownloaded from

  • significant FRSA. The result of the present study sug-

    gests that these plant materials especially M. suaveo-

    lens and M. longifolia can be used as natural source

    of antioxidants for different diseases.

    Funding

    This research received no specific grant from any funding

    agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

    References

    Ahmad N, Fazal H, Abbasi BH, Rashid M, Mahmood T,

    and Fatima N (2010) Efficient regeneration and antiox-

    idant potential in regenerated-tissues of Piper nigrum L.

    Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 102: 129134.

    AI-Sereiti MR, Abu-Amer RM, and Sen P (1999). Pharma-

    cology of rosemary (Rosmarinus officinals Linn.) and its

    therapeutic potentials. Indian Journal of Experimental

    Biology 37(2): 124130.

    Ames BN, Shigenaga MK, and Hagen TM (1993). Oxi-

    dants, antioxidants and the generative disease of aging.

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the

    United States of America 90(17): 79157922.

    Benzie IFF and Strain JJ (1996) The ferric reducing ability

    of plasma as a measure of antioxidant power: The

    FRAP assay. Analytical Biochemistry 239(1): 7076.

    Bronen AL (1975) Toxicology and biochemistry of buty-

    lated hydroxy anizole and butylated hydroxy toluene.

    Journal of the American Oil Chemists Society 52(2):

    5963.

    Cai Y, Luo Q, Sun M, and Corker H (2004) Antioxidant

    activity and phenolic compounds of 112 traditional

    Chinese medicinal plants associated with anticancer.

    Life Sciences 74(17): 21572184.

    Cao G and Prior RL (1999) Measurement of oxygen radical

    absorbance capacity in biological samples. Methods in

    Enzymology 299: 5062.

    Cook NC and Samman S (1996) Flavonoids: Chemistry,

    metabolism, cardioprotective effects and dietary

    sources. The Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry 7:

    6676.

    Couladis M, Tzakou O, and Verykokidou E (2003) Screen-

    ing of some Greek aromatic plants for antioxidant activ-

    ity. Phytotherapy Research. 17(2): 194196.

    Dean RT and Davies MJ (1993) Reactive species and their

    accumulation on radical damaged proteins. Trends in

    Biochemical Sciences 18(11): 437441.

    Dorman HJ, Kosar M, Kahlos K, Holm Y, and Hiltunen R

    (2003) Antioxidant properties and composition of aqu-

    eous extracts from mentha species, hybrids, varieties and

    cultivars. Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemistry

    51(16): 45634569.

    Evelson P, Travacio M, and Repetto M (2001) Evaluation

    of total reactive antioxidant potential of tissue homoge-

    nates and their cytosols. Archives Biochemistry and

    Biophysics 388(2): 261266.

    Ferreira A, Proenca C, Serralheiro MLM, and Araujo MEM

    (2006) The in vitro screening for acetylcholinesterase

    inhibition and antioxidant activity of medicinal plants

    from Portugal. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 108(1):

    3137.

    Fukuda Y, Osawa T, and Namiki M (1990). Studies on anti-

    oxidant substance in sesame seeds. Agricultural and

    Biological Chemistry 49: 301306.

    Gulluce M, Shain F, Sokmen M, Ozer H, Daferera D,

    Sokmen A, et al. (2007) Antimicrobial and antioxidant

    properties of the essential oils and methanol extract from

    Mentha longifolia L. spp. longifolia. Food Chemistry

    103: 14491456.

    Hosseinimehr SJ, Pourmorad F, Shahabimajd N,

    Shahrbandy K, and Hosseinzadeh R (2007). In vitro

    antioxidant activity of Polygonium hyrcanicum,

    Centaurea depressa, Sambucus edulus,Mentha spicata

    and Phytolacca americana. Pakistan Journal of Bio-

    logical Sciences 10(4): 637640.

    Huda-Faujan N, Noriham A, Norrakiah AS, and Babji AS

    (2009) Antioxidant activity of plants methanolic

    extracts containing phenolic compounds. African Jour-

    nal of Biotechnology 8: 484489.

    Kaur C and Kapoor HC (2002) Anti-oxidant activity and total

    phenolic content of some Asian vegetables. International

    Journal of Food Science and Technology 37: 153161.

    Khanavi M, Hajimahmoodi M, Cheraghi-Niroomand M,

    Kargar Z, Ajani Y, Hadjiakhoondi A, et al. (2009) Com-

    parison of the antioxidant activity and total phenolic

    contents in some Stachys species. African Journal of

    Biotechnology 8: 11431147.

    Kofidis G, Bosabalidis A, and Kokkini S (2006) Seasonal

    variations of essential oils in a linalool-rich chemotype

    of Mentha spicata grown wild in Greece. Journal of

    Essential Oil Research 16: 469472.

    Lamaison JL, Petitjean-Freytet C, Duband F, and

    Carnat AP (1991)Rosmarinic acid content and antioxidant

    activity of French Lamiaceae. Fitoterapia 62: 166171.

    Liyana-Pathirana CM and Shahidi F (2006) Antioxidant

    properties of commercial soft and hard winter

    wheats (Triticum aestivum L.) and their milling frac-

    tions. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture

    86: 477485.

    Matkowski A and Piotrowska M (2006) Antioxidant

    and free radical scavenging activities of some

    medicinal plants from the Lamiaceae. Fitoterapia

    77(5): 346353.

    88 Toxicology and Industrial Health 28(1)

    at UNIV OF FLORIDA Smathers Libraries on September 5, 2013tih.sagepub.comDownloaded from

  • Mimica-Dukic N, Bozin B, Sokovic M, and Simin N (2004)

    Antimicrobial and antioxidant activities of Melissa

    officinalis L. (Lamiaceae) essential oil. Journal of Agri-

    culture and Food Chemistry 52(9): 24852489.

    Moreno L, Bello R, Prime-Yufera E, and Esplugues J

    (2002) Pharmacological properties of the methanol

    extract from Mentha suaveolens Ehrh. Phytotherapy

    Research 16(Suppl 1): 1013.

    Naghibi F, Mosaddegh M, Motamed SM, and Ghorbani A

    (2005) Labiatae family in folk medicine in Iran: Ethno-

    botany to Pharmacology. Iranian Journal of Pharma-

    ceutical Research 2: 6379.

    Ou B, Hampsch-Woodill M, and Prior RL (2001) Develop-

    ment and validation of an improved oxygen radical

    absorbance capacity assay using fluorescein as the fluor-

    escent probe. Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemis-

    try 49(10): 46194626.

    Pandey AK, Rai MK, and Acharya D (2003) Chemical

    composition and antimycotic activity of the essential

    oils of corn mint (Mentha arvensis) and lemon grass

    (Cymbopogon flexuosus) against human pathogenic

    fungi. Pharmaceutical Biology 41: 421425.

    Ramarathnam N, Osawa T, Ochi H, and Kawakishi S

    (1995) The contribution of plant food antioxidants to

    human health. Trends in Food Science and Technology

    6: 7577.

    Souria E, Amin G, Dehmobed-Sharifabadi A, Nazifi A, and

    Farsam H (2004) Antioxidative activity of sixty plants

    from Iran. Iranian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences

    3: 5559.

    Tutour BL (1990) Antioxidative activities of algal extracts.

    Synergistic effect with vitamin E. Phytochemistry 29:

    37593765.

    Van den Berg R, Haenen GRMM, and Van den Berg H

    (1999) Applicability of an improved trolox equivalent

    antioxidant capacity assay for evaluation of antioxidant

    capacity measurements of mixtures. Food Chemistry 66:

    511517.

    Vokovic-Gacis B and Simic D (1993) Identification of

    natural antimutagens with modulation effects on DNA

    repair. Basic Life Sciences 6: 269274.

    Yadegarinia D, Gachkar L, Rezaei MB, Taghizadeh M,

    Astaneh SA, andRasooli I (2006). Biochemical activities

    of Iranian Mentha piperita L. andMentha communis L.,

    essential oils. Phytochemistry 67(12): 12491255.

    Zheng W and Wang SY (2001) Antioxidant activity and

    phenolic compounds in selected herbs. Journal of Agri-

    culture and Food Chemistry 49(11): 51655170.

    Ahmad et al. 89

    at UNIV OF FLORIDA Smathers Libraries on September 5, 2013tih.sagepub.comDownloaded from

    /ColorImageDict > /JPEG2000ColorACSImageDict > /JPEG2000ColorImageDict > /AntiAliasGrayImages false /CropGrayImages false /GrayImageMinResolution 266 /GrayImageMinResolutionPolicy /OK /DownsampleGrayImages true /GrayImageDownsampleType /Bicubic /GrayImageResolution 200 /GrayImageDepth -1 /GrayImageMinDownsampleDepth 2 /GrayImageDownsampleThreshold 1.00000 /EncodeGrayImages true /GrayImageFilter /DCTEncode /AutoFilterGrayImages false /GrayImageAutoFilterStrategy /JPEG /GrayACSImageDict > /GrayImageDict > /JPEG2000GrayACSImageDict > /JPEG2000GrayImageDict > /AntiAliasMonoImages false /CropMonoImages false /MonoImageMinResolution 900 /MonoImageMinResolutionPolicy /OK /DownsampleMonoImages true /MonoImageDownsampleType /Average /MonoImageResolution 600 /MonoImageDepth -1 /MonoImageDownsampleThreshold 1.00000 /EncodeMonoImages true /MonoImageFilter /CCITTFaxEncode /MonoImageDict > /AllowPSXObjects false /CheckCompliance [ /None ] /PDFX1aCheck false /PDFX3Check false /PDFXCompliantPDFOnly false /PDFXNoTrimBoxError true /PDFXTrimBoxToMediaBoxOffset [ 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 ] /PDFXSetBleedBoxToMediaBox false /PDFXBleedBoxToTrimBoxOffset [ 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 ] /PDFXOutputIntentProfile (U.S. Web Coated \050SWOP\051 v2) /PDFXOutputConditionIdentifier (CGATS TR 001) /PDFXOutputCondition () /PDFXRegistryName (http://www.color.org) /PDFXTrapped /Unknown

    /Description > /Namespace [ (Adobe) (Common) (1.0) ] /OtherNamespaces [ > > /FormElements true /GenerateStructure false /IncludeBookmarks false /IncludeHyperlinks false /IncludeInteractive false /IncludeLayers false /IncludeProfiles true /MarksOffset 9 /MarksWeight 0.125000 /MultimediaHandling /UseObjectSettings /Namespace [ (Adobe) (CreativeSuite) (2.0) ] /PDFXOutputIntentProfileSelector /DocumentCMYK /PageMarksFile /RomanDefault /PreserveEditing true /UntaggedCMYKHandling /UseDocumentProfile /UntaggedRGBHandling /UseDocumentProfile /UseDocumentBleed false >> ] /SyntheticBoldness 1.000000>> setdistillerparams> setpagedevice