1.4existing land use vacant date of preparation: aug 20, 2013 · 2018-01-24 · planning brief...
TRANSCRIPT
PLANNING BRIEF
PROJECT NAME: Ngan Kwong Wan Road East
Date of Preparation: AUG 20, 2013
1. Site Particulars Current Proposal Remarks1.1 District Location Islands
1.2 Site Location Ngan Kwong Wan Road, Mui Wo
1.3 Site Area
1.3.1 Gross Site Area (approx) (ha)
0.26 Subject to detailed survey.
1.3.2 Net Site Area (approx) (ha) 0.26 Subject to detailed survey.
1.4 Existing Land Use Vacant
1.5 Existing Zoning R3 Mui Wo Central Layout Plan No. L/I-MWC/IE
1.6 Existing Land Status Government Land - Held by DLO
2. Development Parameters Current Proposal Remarks2.1 Proposed Housing Type HOS
2.2 No. of Flats Proposed 180 A +/- 10% variation is allowed for flexibility at the design stage.
2.3 Design Population (approx) 560 Based on average household size of 3.08.
2.4 Maximum Plot Ratio
2.4.1 Domestic and Non-domestic Plot Ratio
3.6 As per agreement at the PlanD-HD Liaison Meeting on 21.1.2013.
2.5 Maximum Gross Floor Area (GFA)
2.5.1 Domestic and Non-domestic GFA (sqm)
9,360 Subject to detailed survey.
2.6 Maximum No. of Storeys or Building Height in mPD
49mPD (maximum)
3. Planning Requirements HKPSG Standards
Provision in accordancewith HKPSG
Current Proposal Remarks
3.1 Open Space (sqm)
3.1.1 Local Open Space (sqm) 1 sqm per person
560 not less than 560 sqm
3.2 Recreation Facilities (no.)
1
3. Planning Requirements HKPSG Standards
Provision in accordancewith HKPSG
Current Proposal Remarks
3.2.1 Badminton Court 1 per 8,000 persons
0.07 -
3.2.2 Basketball Court 1 per 10,000 persons
0.06 -
3.2.3 Table Tennis Table 1 per 7,500 persons
0.07 -
3.2.4 Children's Play Area (sqm)
400 sqm per 5,000 persons
45 not less than 45 sqm
3.3 Greening
3.3.1 Green coverage (% of Gross Site Area)
No set standard
- not less than 20% Target at least 50% to be provided at-grade.
3.4 Parking Facilities (no.) Based on the Departmental Circular No. 2/2012 on Interim Parking Standards for the New Home Ownership (HOS) Projects issued by the Transport Department on 14 February 2012.
3.4.1 Car Parking (Domestic) 1 private car parking space per 13 to 19 flats for New HOS outside 500m radius of rail station
9 to 14 12 Based on 1 space per 15 flats; including one car parking space for the disabled.
3.4.2 Car Parking (Visitor) 2 to 3 visitor parking spaces per residential block
2 to 3 2 Based on 2 spaces per residential block.
3.4.3 Motocycle Parking 1 space per 110 flats
2 2
3.4.4 Loading/Unloading 1 bay per 1 1
2
3. Planning Requirements HKPSG Standards
Provision in accordancewith HKPSG
Current Proposal Remarks
(Domestic) residential block
3.4.5 Bicycle Parking 1 per 7.5 flats for projects within 2km of existing or planned cycle tracks, subject to adjustment to take account of local circumstances, in particular safety consideration in the area
24 24
4. Technical Considerations/Constraints Current Proposal Remarks
4.1 Environmental
4.1.1 Noise EAS is not required for the proposed HOS development as agreed with EPD.
4.1.2 Air EAS is not required for the proposed HOS development as agreed with EPD.
4.1.3 Pedestrian Wind Environment
The results of preliminary studies indicated that the wind performance is relatively good under annual and winter wind conditions.
4.2 Infrastructure
4.2.1 Drainage and Sewerage No insurmountable problem is envisaged. HD has commissioned DSD to carry out SIA.
4.2.2 Water Supply No insurmountable problem is envisaged.
4.2.3 Electricity, Telephone, Gas No insurmountable problem is envisaged. Town Gas is not available. A LPG centralised gas compound will be built within the site.
4.2.4 Quantitative Risk Assessment
Quantitative Risk Assessment (QRA) is required to assess the development proposal against the risk of chlorine leakage in relation to the transport, storage and handling of chlorine at the Silver Mine Bay Water Treatment Works
3
4. Technical Considerations/Constraints Current Proposal Remarks
(SMBWTW). EPD has reviewed the QRA report with no further comment. No insurmountable risk is envisaged.
4.2.5 Roads/Traffic Improvement No insurmountable problem is envisaged. HD has commissioned traffic consultant to conduct TIA for both HOS developments at Ngan Kwong Wan Road East and West.
4.2.6 Geotechnical Requirement Proposed 4 to 5m tall debris-resisting barrier will be constructed along the southern side of the site boundary.
As agreed with GEO of CEDD.
4.3 Urban Design, Visual and Landscape
Domestic block with stepped height profile. Quality landscaped areas will be provided with a greening ratio target of 30%, 20% minimum.
At least 50% will be provided at-grade; to provide a minimum of 3 trees per 100 sqm to the total green coverage and slope greening where feasible.
5. Development Programme Current Proposal Remarks5.1 Foundation Commencement Date 2014/2015
5.2 Building Completion Date 2017/2018
6. Attachments
6.1 Location Plan 6.2 Development Concept Plan
Notes: 1. NET SITE AREA (NSA): In accordance with the Hong Kong Planning Standards and Guidelines (HKPSG), the
NSA should exclude:(a) district and public open space, public recreation facilities, free-standing schools and community facilities
(including those on the podium), open-air public transport terminal / interchange;(b) internal roads; and(c) natural vegetated slopes and man-made slopes (for the latter, except slopes regraded to form developable
area). 2. NUMBER OF FLATS AND DESIGN POPULATION: To allow flexibility in the design, ±10% adjustment will be
allowed for the number of flats and design population together with corresponding adjustments to ancillary facilities in line with HKPSG or the requirements of client departments. If a project remains within the 10% allowance, no revision to PB and no re-submission to DipCon is necessary subject to no adverse comments from client departments on the corresponding adjustments to ancillary facilities.
3. GROSS FLOOR AREA (GFA): Covered public transport terminal/interchange should be accountable for GFA
4
calculation. 4. PLOT RATIO (PR): PR should be calculated on the basis of net site area. 5. MAXIMUM GFA, PR AND NUMBER OF STOREYS OR BUILDING HEIGHT: OZP restrictions have to be
specified under the Remarks column. The maximum GFA, PR and No. of storeys or building height for the current proposal should be based on the optimal development intensities of the site with reference to relevant planning studies or proposal by PlanD, or HD, with justifications instead of blanket adoption of the maximum development restrictions stipulated in the OZP.
6. MAXIMUM NUMBER OF STOREYS OR BUILDING HEIGHT in mPD: Should there be variations in height limits
across the site, the different maximum heights in mPD at main roof level or number of storeys permitted should be indicated on a plan.
7. PLANNING REQUIREMENTS: The District Planning Officer will check compliance with the HKPSG where
appropriate. 8. SOCIAL WELFARE AND COMMUNITY FACILITIES: District and territorial welfare/community facilities are
determined by client departments (SWD, HAD, etc) and any site area involved in free standing facilities should be excluded from site area for PR calculation.
9. RETAIL AND COMMERCIAL FACILITIES: HD will determine the amount of retail floor space required in the
development. 10. PEDESTRIAN WIND ENVIRONMENT: HPLB / ETWB Joint Technical Circular No.1/06 on Air Ventilation
Assessments to be referred, if appropriate. 11. DEPARTMENTAL COMMENTS: Following circulation, a summary of comments with responses should be
included in the appendix for submission of the draft planning brief for endorsement by DipCon. Prepared by Planning Section, Housing Department
5*** End of Report ***