14edf 7463 class 8 - writing up factor analysis results

2
EDF 7463 Dr. Stephen A. Sivo Factor Analysis: One Way to Proceed  An Expanded Lis t of Interpreti ve Steps 1. Run the SPSS factor analysis program on your data, using the Promax rotation. 2. Examine your SPSS output and make sure SPSS does not complain about “nonpositive definite " results and does not comment on any communalities exceeding 1.0. If it does either, you r results are improper an d cannot be interpreted. You have to clean up your data somehow (e.g., you may h ave to remove buggy items, such as items without any variability – constants - and items that perfectly correlate with other items – more on this later). 3. Report how many factors underlie your data by reviewing the scree plot and noting how many factors have an eigenvalue of 1.0 or higher.  Pat yourself on the back: You have just “extracted factors”. 4. Review your Promax (oblique rotation) results. Report whether the correlation coefficients among the Factors are sufficiently large (substantial) enough to make the oblique rotation preferable. These correlation coefficients are in the Factor Correlation Matrix reported along with the oblique (Promax) rotation. They are at the end of your output. 5. Now you must choose which way to go: (a) If the correlat ion coef ficients among the factors ARE substantial (several > .30), proceed to step 5a below. (b) If the correlation coefficients among the factors are  NOT subs tantial, proceed to step 5b below  (all or nearly all < .30). 5a. So, the correlation coefficients among the factors  ARE substantial!  Review the Structure matrix in your output. Report which items load high on each factor, and as you do this, name each factor based upon what concept you, in your best judgment, think conceptually ties those highly related items tog ether. You are like the parent of a newborn, whose face you want to see before given it a name. Study the variables that c orrelate highly with each relevant factor, and then, upon making your best judgment regarding the conceptual tie, name each factor  Remember to only do t his for  factors that ach ieved a 1.0 or higher eigenvalue (see Step 2). Because your factors are substantial, you will not proceed to the Varimax rotation discussed in 5b. The Varimax procedure assumes factors are uncorrelated. 5b. So, the correlation coefficients among the factors are NOT substantial! 1

Upload: hunnygoyal

Post on 03-Jun-2018

220 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

8/12/2019 14EDF 7463 Class 8 - Writing Up Factor Analysis Results

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/14edf-7463-class-8-writing-up-factor-analysis-results 1/2

EDF 7463 Dr. Stephen A. Sivo

Factor Analysis: One Way to Proceed

 An Expanded List of Interpretive Steps

1. Run the SPSS factor analysis program on your data, using the Promax rotation.

2. Examine your SPSS output and make sure SPSS does not complain about

“nonpositive definite" results and does not comment on any communalities

exceeding 1.0. If it does either, your results are improper and cannot be

interpreted. You have to clean up your data somehow (e.g., you may have to

remove buggy items, such as items without any variability – constants - and

items that perfectly correlate with other items – more on this later).

3. Report how many factors underlie your data by reviewing the scree plot and

noting how many factors have an eigenvalue of 1.0 or higher.  Pat yourself on the

back: You have just “extracted factors”.

4. Review your Promax (oblique rotation) results. Report whether the

correlation coefficients among the Factors are sufficiently large (substantial)

enough to make the oblique rotation preferable. These correlation coefficients are

in the Factor Correlation Matrix reported along with the oblique (Promax)

rotation. They are at the end of your output.

5. Now you must choose which way to go: (a) If the correlation coefficients

among the factors ARE substantial (several > .30), proceed to step 5a below.

(b) If the correlation coefficients among the factors are  NOT substantial,

proceed to step 5b below (all or nearly all < .30).

5a. So, the correlation coefficients among the factors ARE substantial! 

Review the Structure matrix in your output. Report which items load

high on each factor, and as you do this, name each factor based upon what

concept you, in your best judgment, think conceptually ties those highly

related items together. You are like the parent of a newborn, whose face you

want to see before given it a name. Study the variables that correlate highly

with each relevant factor, and then, upon making your best judgment

regarding the conceptual tie, name each factor Remember to only do this for factors that achieved a 1.0 or higher eigenvalue (see Step 2). Because your

factors are substantial, you will not proceed to the Varimax rotation

discussed in 5b. The Varimax procedure assumes factors are uncorrelated.

5b. So, the correlation coefficients among the factors are NOT substantial! 

1

8/12/2019 14EDF 7463 Class 8 - Writing Up Factor Analysis Results

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/14edf-7463-class-8-writing-up-factor-analysis-results 2/2

EDF 7463 Dr. Stephen A. Sivo

Review the Rotated Factor Matrix results generated by the Varimax

(orthogonal) rotation results. Report which items load high on each factor,

and as you do this, name each factor based upon what concept you, in your

best judgment, think conceptually ties those items together.  Remember to

only do this for factors that achieved a 1.0 or higher eigenvalue (see Step 2).

2