144-111-pi-cal-001_r1
DESCRIPTION
gfjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjTRANSCRIPT
Project No : 040176
PIPING FLEXIBILITY ANALYSIS
Client : Petro Canada
Project : De Ruyter Production Platform
Location : P11-b
Document number: 144-111-PI-CAL-001 Rev. no : R1 Page : 1 of 11
PIPING FLEXIBILITY ANALYSIS
PIPING SYSTEM
SK-001
PREPARED FOR
By:Iv-Oil & Gas b.v
Rev. Description Date By Checked Appr’d by
R1 For DNV Comments / Approval 30-08-2005 G.F. Costoiu R. Tjin M. van Neck
Project No : 040176
PIPING FLEXIBILITY ANALYSIS
Client : Petro Canada
Project : De Ruyter Production Platform
Location : P11-b
Document number: 144-111-PI-CAL-001 Rev. no : R1 Page : 2 of 11
Rev. Description Date By Checked Appr’d by
R1 For DNV Comments / Approval 30-08-2005 G.F. Costoiu R. Tjin M. van Neck
Project No : 040176
PIPING FLEXIBILITY ANALYSIS
Client : Petro Canada
Project : De Ruyter Production Platform
Location : P11-b
Document number: 144-111-PI-CAL-001 Rev. no : R1 Page : 3 of 11
TABLE OF CONTENTS Page
1. INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................................................ 31.1 SCOPE OF WORK.............................................................................................................................. 31.2 APPLICABLE CODES......................................................................................................................... 31.3 REFERENCE DOCUMENTS..............................................................................................................3
2. SYSTEM DESIGN.......................................................................................................................................... 42.1 LINE DATA........................................................................................................................................... 42.2 CII CALCULATIONS............................................................................................................................ 42.3 DESIGN LOAD CASES........................................................................................................................ 52.4 ALLOWABLE STRESSES...................................................................................................................62.5 BLAST CALCULATIONS..................................................................................................................... 62.6 PIPE SUPPORTS................................................................................................................................ 62.7 FLANGE CONNECTIONS...................................................................................................................62.8 BRIDGE DISPLACEMENTS................................................................................................................72.9 FATIGUE CALCULATION.................................................................................................................... 7
3. STRESS ANALYSIS.................................................................................................................................... 103.1 COMPUTER MODEL......................................................................................................................... 10
4. ANALYSIS RESULTS................................................................................................................................. 114.1 STRESSES........................................................................................................................................ 114.2 FATIGUE............................................................................................................................................ 114.3 FLANGES.......................................................................................................................................... 11
APPENDICES
APPENDIX 1 STRESS SKETCHES
APPENDIX 2 PIPE SUPPORT DETAILED DRAWINGS
APPENDIX 3 CONSTRUCTION ISOMETRICS
APPENDIX 4 MISCELLANEOUS CALCULATIONSAppendix 4.1 Flange Calculations
Appendix 4.2 Relative Bridge Displacements
Appendix 4.3 Fatigue Displacements
APPENDIX 5 CAESAR II PRINTOUT
Project No : 040176
PIPING FLEXIBILITY ANALYSIS
Client : Petro Canada
Project : De Ruyter Production Platform
Location : P11-b
Document number: 144-111-PI-CAL-001 Rev. no : R1 Page : 4 of 11 1. INTRODUCTION
1.1 SCOPE OF WORK
The purpose of this report is to demonstrate that piping systems SK-001, part of De Ruyter topside piping, has inherent flexibility to accommodate displacements due to design conditions, without imposing any excessive loads on pipe supports and equipment nozzles. Furthermore the piping stress level has to satisfy the designated code.
1.2 APPLICABLE CODES
The governing code for piping design is:
ASME B31.3 Process Piping
For items not covered by the above-mentioned document, reference is made to the following codes and standards:
ASME VIII Rules for construction of pressure vessels, Division 1 and 2
ASME III Rules for Construction of Nuclear Facility Components, Division 1
ASME B16.5 Pipe Flanges and Flanged Fittings
WRC-107 Local stresses in Spherical and Cylindrical Shells due to External loadings
1.3 REFERENCE DOCUMENTS
144-002-PI-SPE-0002 Piping Classes Specifications
144-002-PI-SPE-0007 Plant Department Pipe Stress Design Criteria
144-111-PI-LST-0001 Plant Department Critical Line List
144-000-PR-LST-0001 Process Line List
144-000-ME-SPE-0004 Nozzle Loads on Equipment
144-002-HE-TNS-0007 Blast Design Strategy and Overpressures
Project No : 040176
PIPING FLEXIBILITY ANALYSIS
Client : Petro Canada
Project : De Ruyter Production Platform
Location : P11-b
Document number: 144-111-PI-CAL-001 Rev. no : R1 Page : 5 of 11 2. SYSTEM DESIGN
2.1 LINE DATA
Functional design data, used for analysis, is summarised below:
Item/ Line No.
Pipe
Cla
ss
Cor
rosi
on
Allo
wan
ce
Des
ign
Pres
sure
Hyd
rote
st P
ress
ure
Max
imum
Des
ign
Tem
pera
ture
Min
imum
Des
ign
Tem
pera
ture
Ope
ratin
g Te
mp.
Med
ium
Den
sity
Flan
ge R
atin
g
Drawing Number
- mm barg barg °C °C °C Kg/m3 # -
6”-HC-100-002-E41-D E41 3 165 247.5 75 -11 60 1025 1500100002-0501/
1203
6”-HC-100-004-E41-D E41 3 165 247.5 75 -11 60 1025 1500100004-0501/
1203
6”-HC-100-006-E41-D E41 3 165 247.5 75 -11 60 1025 1500100006-0501/
1203
Note: - Installation temperature assumed as -11°C throughout.
2.2 CII CALCULATIONS
The following CII calculations have been performed:
SK-001-R1 : Design conditions.
SK-001B-R1 : Blast loads.
SK-001F-R1 : Fatigue calculation.
Project No : 040176
PIPING FLEXIBILITY ANALYSIS
Client : Petro Canada
Project : De Ruyter Production Platform
Location : P11-b
Document number: 144-111-PI-CAL-001 Rev. no : R1 Page : 6 of 11
2.3 DESIGN LOAD CASES
The Functional Loads, used to generate the design load cases, comprise the following:
(W) Gravity load, due to self-weight of steel, contents and insulation.
(P1) Pressure load, due to design pressure.
(T1) Thermal load due to maximum design temperature.
(D1..4) Relative bridge displacements (refer to paragraph 2.8 of this report for further details).
(H) Hanger load.
(WIN1..4) Wind loads based on 42m/s velocity at 10m (100 year - 3 sec’s gust). Loads are applied in +X for Case 1, -X for Case2, +Z for Case 3 and –Z for Case 4.
Project No : 040176
PIPING FLEXIBILITY ANALYSIS
Client : Petro Canada
Project : De Ruyter Production Platform
Location : P11-b
Document number: 144-111-PI-CAL-001 Rev. no : R1 Page : 7 of 11
2.4 ALLOWABLE STRESSES
The allowable stresses are in compliance with the criteria specified in ASME B31.3
Material Max temp [ºC ]
Material Properties [N/ mm²] Allowable stresses [N/mm²]
SMTS SMYS Yield Sh Sa (EXP) Socc (OCC)
A333 Gr. 6 75 414 241 227.5137.9 207 183
Sustained Stress range Occasional
Note : Stress range is based on a stress reduction factor (f) of 1.
2.5 BLAST CALCULATIONS
This system is non blast critical. However blast loads are applied from node 350, down to production header in order to determine the extreme loads at supports closest to (and at) production header. Refer to system SK-009 for blast critical pipework.
Supports at the following node numbers are designed for blast loads: 350, 2350, 3350, 2380 and 3380.
Blast Load: 20 KN/m2
Shape factor: 0.9 (conservative approach resulting in approximately 20% safety margin).
Fig 2.5.1 Blast load cases Fig 2.5.2 Sample blast loads using CII wind modeler
The blast loads are generated using CII wind modeler (see figure 2.5.2). The loads are applied in four (4) directions as described in section 2.3, above. Blast load cases used for calculation are listed in figure 2.5.1. Definition of loads is as per paragraph 2.3 with exception of (WIN1…4) which represents the blast loads and T1 = operating temperature (60oC) and P1 = operating pressure (17barg).
2.6 PIPE SUPPORTS
All loads on supports are summarised in the Pipe Stress Analysis Output.
The loads include the friction forces. In this case a friction coefficient of 0.4 is taken into account for friction between steel surfaces. In special cases where PTFE-sliding pads may be applied a friction coefficient of 0.1 shall be taken into account. The pipe support detail drawings are included in Appendix 2.
2.7 FLANGE CONNECTIONS
Flange connections are modelled in CAESAR II by anchoring together the rigid elements through a CNODE. This enables an easy check of the external loads using CII restraint output summary.
Project No : 040176
PIPING FLEXIBILITY ANALYSIS
Client : Petro Canada
Project : De Ruyter Production Platform
Location : P11-b
Document number: 144-111-PI-CAL-001 Rev. no : R1 Page : 8 of 11
For B16.5 flange analysis, either of the following two methods has been used:
1. External loads acting on these connections are assessed using the ASME BPVC, Section VIII, Division 1, Appendix 2 in combination with Section III, subsection NC. Actual hub length is used.
2. External loads acting on these connections are assessed using the ASME Section III, Division 1, subsection NC-3658.3, ASME B16.5a Flanged Joints with High Strength Bolting, with yield stress at temperature, SY, substituted with B31.3 allowable stress, Sh.
Flange analysis is performed for maximum acting loads and calculations are performed for each flange size in the calculation.
2.8 BRIDGE DISPLACEMENTS
The relative displacements between WB (wellbay) and IPD (integrated production deck) are accounted for in the stress analysis by using Caesar’s II forced nodal displacements D1 u/I D8. These displacements are applied to the supports connected to WB while the other supports, connected to IPD, are fixed (no movements).
The movements of WB and IPD are determined by others and are provided in SQ-425, included in Appendix 4.2 of this report. Displacements for 8 wave directions and for 1 year and 100 year extreme conditions are given.
For the purpose of this report, the 100 year displacements are selected. Further more the similar locations at WB and IPD at top of leg B4, elevation +26 and +35 are selected. The relative displacements are determined by subtracting the WB movements from IPD movements. These displacements are applied at the following supports:Node 160 and 290 (line 6”-HC-100-002),Node 2160 and 2290 (line 6”-HC-100-005),Node 3160 and 3290 (line 6”-HC-100-006).
The relative displacements, calculated as indicated above, are included in the computer model using the nodal displacement sets:
D1 100 year, wave 00 deg.
D2 100 year, wave 45 deg.
D3 100 year, wave 90 deg.
D4 100 year, wave 135 deg.
D5 100 year, wave 180 deg.
D6 100 year, wave 225 deg.
D7 100 year, wave 270 deg.
D8 100 year, wave 315 deg.
Refer to Appendix 4.2 for details.
2.9 FATIGUE CALCULATION
The stress fluctuations, imposed over the design life (20 years), have been considered for the fatigue assessment. The fluctuating loads are divided into two categories:
A. Operating loads
B. Environmental loads due to wave (relative platform deflections)
The fatigue life is acceptable if the sum of usage ratios (for all considered load cases) is smaller than 1:
Project No : 040176
PIPING FLEXIBILITY ANALYSIS
Client : Petro Canada
Project : De Ruyter Production Platform
Location : P11-b
Document number: 144-111-PI-CAL-001 Rev. no : R1 Page : 9 of 11
Where:
n = calculated number of cyclesN = allowable number of cycles k = number of load cases
The allowable number of cycles is determined, by Caesar II, using the ASME VIII Division 2, Figure 5.110.1, UTS<80 ksi. Stress data points are entered as allowable stress range, see figure 2.9.1. Values higher than 106 cycles are extrapolated.
Operating loads (A) used for fatigue analysis are described below.
- Pressure variations assumed from atmospheric to design pressure of 165 barg. Caesar II abbreviation P1.
- Temperature variations assumed from minimum design (-11oC) to maximum design (75oC). Caesar II abbreviation T1.
- Relative displacements due to 382t of wireline equipment on IPD weather deck. Caesar II abbreviation D9.
The number of cycles for operating loads is determined assuming five a week: 5 x 52 x 20 = 5200 cycles
Environmental loads (B) used for fatigue analysis are described below.
- Relative displacements due to waves. The wave scattered diagram, derived from doc no 144-002-SG-CAL-2003, has been used to determine the number of cycles. Refer to figure 2.9.3. All waves are divided in four blocks and for each block the displacements for highest wave is determined . The stresses calculated for these displacements are considered to apply for all number of cycles found in that particular block (conservative approach).
The relative displacements are calculated by linear interpolation using the wave heights of 100 year wave (13.8m), 1 year wave (10m). Further more the wave direction resulting in highest stresses has been selected and used for all other directions. That is 45o – 225o direction. Detailed calculations are enclosed in Appendix 4.3 of this report.
CII Load Cases
Load cases generated for fatigue calculation are indicated in figure 2.9.2. Definition of loads is as per paragraph 2.3 with exception of (D1…9).
D1 relative displacements - waves in Block 1 / 45o direction.
D2 relative displacements - waves in Block 1 / 225o direction.
D3 relative displacements - waves in Block 2 / 45o direction.
D4 relative displacements - waves in Block 2 / 225o direction.
D5 relative displacements - waves in Block 3 / 45o direction.
D6 relative displacements - waves in Block 3 / 225o direction.
D7 relative displacements - waves in Block 4 / 45o direction.
D8 relative displacements - waves in Block 4 / 225o direction.
D9 relative displacements due to 382t of wireline equipment on IPD weather deck.
Fig. 2.9.1
Fig. 2.9.2 CII load cases
Fig. 2.9.2 Caesar II fatigue load cases
Project No : 040176
PIPING FLEXIBILITY ANALYSIS
Client : Petro Canada
Project : De Ruyter Production Platform
Location : P11-b
Document number: 144-111-PI-CAL-001 Rev. no : R1 Page : 10 of 11
Tabl
e 2.
9.3
W
ave
scat
ter
diag
ram
Project No : 040176
PIPING FLEXIBILITY ANALYSIS
Client : Petro Canada
Project : De Ruyter Production Platform
Location : P11-b
Document number: 144-111-PI-CAL-001 Rev. no : R1 Page : 11 of 11
3. STRESS ANALYSIS
3.1 COMPUTER MODELFinite element computer models are developed based on the stress isometric included in Appendix 1.
Pipe stress program CAESAR II version 4.50, developed and marketed by COADE Engineering Software has been used for the analysis of the piping systems. This software package is a widely accepted tool to perform comprehensive stress analysis of complex piping systems.
The global co-ordinate system used in the computer model is indicated on the stress isometrics. Small differences in dimensions between the piping isometrics and the calculations may occur, but have no significant effect on the analysis.
Notes
This system is non blast critical. However, blast loads have been applied only to determine the loads at and near production manifold 10”-HC-120-001-E41.
The effects of platform movements have been simulated by including the relative displacements at the supports connected to WB structure. All other support, connected to IPD structure, are fixed.
System Overlap
The production manifold (nodes 1010 to 1400), part of system SK009, has been included in this calculation for overlap.
The pipe routing of this system is shown below:
Pipe supports connected to WB
310-VN-01A
Overlap – Sys. SK-009 Pipe supports connected to IPD
Limit of blast applied loads
N160N2160
N3160
Project No : 040176
PIPING FLEXIBILITY ANALYSIS
Client : Petro Canada
Project : De Ruyter Production Platform
Location : P11-b
Document number: 144-111-PI-CAL-001 Rev. no : R1 Page : 12 of 11 4. ANALYSIS RESULTS
4.1 STRESSES
The maximum calculated code stresses are summarized below and compared against B31.3 code allowable values.
All stresses are found to be within the allowable limits.
Table 4.1.1 Maximum Sustained Stress (SK-001-R1)
Case No. Node MaterialCode Stress
N/mm²
Allowable Stress
N/mm²
Ratio
2 1050 A333 Gr. 6 71.2 137.9 0.51
Table 4.1.2 Maximum Stress Range (SK-001-R1)
Case No. Node MaterialCode Stress
N/mm²
Allowable Stress
N/mm²
Ratio
22 3319 A333 Gr. 6 143.6 207 0.69
Table 4.1.3 Maximum Occasional Stress – Wind effects (SK-001-R1)
Case No. Node MaterialCode Stress
N/mm²
Allowable Stress
N/mm²
Ratio
31 1050 A333 Gr. 6 72.8 183 0.40
4.2 FATIGUE
The fatigue life is found acceptable, since the maximum utilization ratio, found at node 3319, is:
0.62 < 1.
4.3 FLANGES
The integrity of the ASME B16.5 flanges, under the maximum external loads, has been checked as outlined in section 2.7. The external loads are found to be acceptable. Detailed flange calculations and the summary have been included in Appendix 4.1 where required.
Project No : 040176
PIPING FLEXIBILITY ANALYSIS
Client : Petro Canada
Project : De Ruyter Production Platform
Location : P11-b
Document number: 144-111-PI-CAL-001 Rev. no : R1 Page : 13 of 11
Project no : 040176
Client : Petro Canada
Project title : De Ruyter Production Platform
Location : P11-b
PIPING FLEXIBILITY ANALYSIS
Document number : 144-111-PI-CAL-001 Rev. no : R1
APPENDIX 1
STRESS SKETCHES
Project no : 040176
Client : Petro Canada
Project title : De Ruyter Production Platform
Location : P11-b
PIPING FLEXIBILITY ANALYSIS
Document number : 144-111-PI-CAL-001 Rev. no : R1
APPENDIX 2
PIPE SUPPORT DETAILED DRAWINGS
Hold for node: 160; 290; 310; 330; 340; 350; 2160; 2290; 2310; 2330; 2340; 2350; 23803160; 3290; 3310; 3330; 3340; 3350; 3380
Project no : 040176
Client : Petro Canada
Project title : De Ruyter Production Platform
Location : P11-b
PIPING FLEXIBILITY ANALYSIS
Document number : 144-111-PI-CAL-001 Rev. no : R1
APPENDIX 3
CONSTRUCTION ISOMETRICS
Project no : 040176
Client : Petro Canada
Project title : De Ruyter Production Platform
Location : P11-b
PIPING FLEXIBILITY ANALYSIS
Document number : 144-111-PI-CAL-001 Rev. no : R1
APPENDIX 4
MISCELLANEOUS CALCULATIONS
Project no : 040176
Client : Petro Canada
Project title : De Ruyter Production Platform
Location : P11-b
PIPING FLEXIBILITY ANALYSIS
Document number : 144-111-PI-CAL-001 Rev. no : R1
APPENDIX 4.1
FLANGE CALCULATIONS
Project no : 040176
Client : Petro Canada
Project title : De Ruyter Production Platform
Location : P11-b
PIPING FLEXIBILITY ANALYSIS
Document number : 144-111-PI-CAL-001 Rev. no : R1
APPENDIX 4.2
RELATIVE BRIDGE DISPLACEMENTS
Project no : 040176
Client : Petro Canada
Project title : De Ruyter Production Platform
Location : P11-b
PIPING FLEXIBILITY ANALYSIS
Document number : 144-111-PI-CAL-001 Rev. no : R1
APPENDIX 4.3
FATIGUE DISPLACEMENTS
Project no : 040176
Client : Petro Canada
Project title : De Ruyter Production Platform
Location : P11-b
PIPING FLEXIBILITY ANALYSIS
Document number : 144-111-PI-CAL-001 Rev. no : R1
APPENDIX 5
CAESAR II PRINTOUT