1415.full

Upload: perisha-veera

Post on 03-Apr-2018

212 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/28/2019 1415.full

    1/2

    Editorial

    Intracranial hypertension, headacheand obesity: Insights from magneticresonance venography

    Deborah l Friedman

    Idiopathic intracranial hypertension without papilloe-

    dema (IIHWOP) is uncommon, accounting for, at

    most, 5% of patients with IIH evaluated by neuro-

    ophthalmologists (1). In contrast to patients with IIH

    and papilloedema, patients with IIHWOP are less

    obese, have lower cerebrospinal fluid pressures, and

    are more likely to have non-organic visual loss (1).

    This entity is perhaps more readily diagnosed among

    headache specialists than neuro-ophthalmologists and

    is suspected in obese women with intractable or chronic

    daily headaches (2).

    The integral relationship between the central venous

    system and intracranial pressure has been emphasised

    over the past several years with the discovery of venous

    sinus abnormalities in patients with IIH (3). Morpho-

    logical irregularities and abnormal pressure gradients

    within the transverse sinuses are well described. In

    most cases, transverse venous sinus stenosis appearsto be a result of high intracranial pressure rather than

    its cause (4). The transverse sinuses are asymmetric in

    most individuals and a unilateral hypoplastic sinus is

    considered a normal variant. However, bilateral trans-

    verse sinus stenosis (BTSS) may be associated with

    intracranial hypertension.

    In this issue of Cephalalgia, Bono and colleagues

    studied 98 patients with chronic migraine and chronic

    tension type headache using magnetic resonance venog-

    raphy and 1-h continuous lumbar CSF pressure moni-

    toring (5). Their findings are notable in several respects.

    Strikingly, their patients were obese, regardless of

    CSF pressure status. Patients with normal CSF pres-

    sure (Group 1) were less overweight than in the groups

    with either intermittently (Group 2) or consistently

    (Group 3) elevated CSF pressure, and some patients

    in Group 1 had a normal body mass index (BMI),

    but overall this cohort was overweight. There was no

    different in BMI between subjects in Groups 2 and 3.

    Obesity is a risk factor for both IIH and the develop-

    ment of chronic daily headache (6).

    Although there was a statistically significant differ-

    ence in both mean CSF pressure and opening pressure

    between the three groups, only some of the patients in

    Group 3 met criteria for the diagnosis of IIH by current

    standards (7). Pressures between 201249 mm CSF are

    non-diagnostic (8).

    BTSS has been noted in a majority of patients with

    IIH by various investigators. It is less commonly

    encountered in a typical practice setting, even in

    patients with papilloedema. The high prevalence of

    BTSS in this cohort is perhaps attributable to the imag-

    ing technique used, which the investigators previously

    found to have a very high detection rate of transverse

    sinus stenosis (three dimensional phase contrast images

    with 15 cm/s velocity encoding). Conventional MR

    venography is often performed using two dimensional

    time of flight, and the images are likely subjected to less

    scrutiny in the practice setting than the research setting.

    All subjects in Groups 2 and 3 had BTSS, whereas only

    four of 54 patients in group 1 had BTSS. As previouslynoted, unilateral transverse sinus stenosis was not asso-

    ciated with abnormal intracranial pressure.

    One-hour monitoring showed mean pressures that

    were consistently higher than the opening pressure in

    all groups. The importance of this finding cannot be

    overemphasised. An isolated CSF pressure measure-

    ment is but a snapshot in time and may be spuriously

    high or low, depending on the situation and technique

    employed. Prolonged monitoring also revealed B-waves

    in Groups 2 and 3; B-waves are frequently recorded

    with increased intracranial pressure of various aetiolo-

    gies, although there is far greater experience defining

    pressure wave abnormalities with intracranial pressure

    monitoring systems than with lumbar recording

    methods.

    Digre and colleagues (1) found that treatment of

    patients with IIHWOP with agents conventionally

    University of Rochester, USA.

    Corresponding author:

    Dr Deborah l Friedman. University of Rochester, New York, USA

    Email: [email protected]

    Cephalalgia

    30(12) 14151416

    ! International Headache Society 2010

    Reprints and permissions:

    sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav

    DOI: 10.1177/0333102410370872

    cep.sagepub.com

  • 7/28/2019 1415.full

    2/2

    used for IIH was less than satisfactory than in patients

    having IIH with papilloedema, and shunting was not

    always beneficial. The patients of Bono et al. were trea-

    ted with a low dose of acetazolamide and topiramate

    which improved the headache in most subjects.

    However, the response to acetazolamide and topira-

    mate is not specific, as both medications have a symp-tomatic effect on headache. Interestingly, some of the

    patients had been previously treated with topiramate

    for headaches without improvement (personal commu-

    nication with Professor Bono); it is a bit surprising that

    adding a relatively low dose of acetazolamide would

    dramatically increase their therapeutic response.

    These patients were not re-imaged after treatment; par-

    adoxically, another study by these investigators showed

    that the BTSS persisted in IIH patients who were suc-

    cessfully treated with medications rendering them

    asymptomatic with normal CSF pressures (9). These

    findings contrast with other reports demonstrating

    reversal of venous sinus stenosis acutely after measures

    to lower CSF pressure (4,10).

    In summary, this paper raises intriguing questions

    about the pathophysiology of IIH, the contribution of

    both obesity and intracranial pressure to chronic head-

    aches, and the possibility of a continuum of chronic

    daily headache to IIH. It underscores the involvement

    of the cerebral venous sinuses in the hydrodynamics of

    CSF pressure. BTSS may be a marker of increased

    intracranial pressure but it is not a consistent finding

    in patients with IIH and papilloedema in clinical prac-

    tice. Whether BTSS is the cause or the effect of intra-

    cranial hypertension, its detection by magneticresonance venography in patients with chronic head-

    aches may provide important information into the

    nature of their headache disorder and subsequent man-

    agement. Lumbar puncture, currently the gold

    standard for diagnosing IIH and other disorders affect-

    ing intracranial pressure, may demonstrate misleading

    results at times but it is widely available and more

    practical than prolonged monitoring in the clinical set-

    ting. A high opening CSF pressure in and of itself is

    neither specific nor diagnostic and must to be used in

    context with other data from the history, examination,

    neuroimaging and laboratory to arrive at the correct

    diagnosis.

    References

    1. Digre KB, Nakamoto BK, Warner JEA, Langeberg WJ,

    Baggaley SK, Katz BJ. A comparison of idiopathic intra-

    cranial hypertension with and without papilledema.

    Headache 2009; 49: 185193.

    2. Wang S-J, Silberstein SD, Patterson S, Young WB.

    Idiopathic intracranial hypertension without papille-

    dema. A case-control study in a headache center.

    Neurology 1998; 51: 245249.

    3. Farb RI, Vanek I, Scott JN, et al. Idiopathic intracranial

    hypertension. The prevalence and morphology of sinove-

    nous stenosis. Neurology 2003; 60: 14181424.

    4. King JO, Mitchell PJ, Thomson KR, Tress BM. Mano-metry combined with cervical puncture in idiopathic

    intracranial hypertension. Neurology 2002; 58: 2630.

    5. Bono F, Salvino D, Tallarico T, et al. Abnormal pressure

    waves in headache sufferers with bilateral transverse sinus

    stenosis. Cephalalgia May 12, 2010; doi:10.1177/

    0333102410370877.

    6. Scher AI, Stewart WF, Ricci JA, Lipton RB. Factors asso-

    ciated with the onset and remission of chronic daily head-

    ache in a population-based study. Pain 2003; 106: 8189.

    7. Friedman DI, Jacobson DM. Diagnostic criteria for

    idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Neurology 2002;

    59: 14921495.

    8. Corbett JJ, Mehta MP. Cerebrospinal fluid pressure in

    normal obese subjects and patients with pseudotumor

    cerebri. Neurology 1983; 33: 13861388.

    9. Bono F, Gilberto C, Mastrandrea C, et al. Transverse

    sinus stenoses persists after normalization of the CSF

    pressure in IIH. Neurology 2005; 65: 19901093.

    10. Baryshnik DB, Farb RI. Changes in the appearance of

    venous sinuses after treatment of disordered intracranial

    pressure. Neurology 2004; 62: 14451446.

    1416 Cephalalgia 30(12)