1.3 review: civil- military synergies m6... · 2020. 2. 3. · ational cen x sion) ieceu t no...
TRANSCRIPT
-
D1.3 Review
Imp
Lead bene
Delivery da
Revision: 2
Dissemin
PU: Publi
PP: Restr
RE: Restr
w: Civil- Milit
proving the
eficiary: Nat
ate: M6
2.0
nation Leve
c
ricted to oth
ricted to a g
tary Synergie
e Effective
1.3 Rev
ional Defen
el
her program
group specif
es
PRO
eness of C
view: Ci
nce Universi
mme particip
fied by the c
Public
OJECT TIT
Capabilitie
vil- Mili
ity/ Finnish
pants (includ
consortium
TLE:
es (IEC) in
tary Sy
Defence Fo
ding the Co
(including t
n EU confl
nergies
orces Intern
mmission)
the Commis
Contrac
Start date
Duration
ict preven
s
national Cen
X
ssion)
IECEU
ct no 653371
: 01/05/2015
n: 33 months
ntion
ntre
U
5
s
-
D1.3 Review Revision h
Rev. D
1.0 1
1.1 7
1.2 2
1.3 1
1.4 2
1.5 2
1.6 0
1.7 1
1.8 2
1.9 2
2.0 1
w: Civil- Milit
This project has re
history
Date
16/06/2015
7/07/2015
29/07/2015
10/08/2015
20/09/2015
25/09/2015
07/10/2015
14/10/2015
25/10/2015
29/10/2015
11/09/2015
tary Synergie
eceived funding from
Author
NDU,
NDU,
NDU,
NDU,
NDU,
NDU,
NDU,
CMCF
NDU,
CMCF
NDU,
NDU,
LAU, K
es
the European Union
r
E. Norvanto
E. Norvanto
E. Norvanto
E. Norvanto
E. Norvanto
E. Norvanto
E. Norvanto
FI, J. Muston
E. Norvanto
FI, J. Muston
E. Norvanto
E. Norvanto
K. Hyttinen
PU
n’s Horizon 2020 rese
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
nen
o
nen
o
o
earch and innovation
Notes
Rough delivera
Structu
Final damong
Plan fpanel d
All the collecte
Rough delivera
Final deliverainterna
Internawhole beginnconsor
Generacomple
Final d
Final V
n programme under g
structurable
ure set (sub
distribution the team c
for the datadiscussions
data used ed
draft oable
draft of able and bel review
al review codocument
ing of gentium
al review eted
raft
Version to be
CSA proStart date
Duration
grant agreement No
re for
headings e
of the tacompleted
a collection completed
for the deli
of the w
f the weginning of
ompleted oft by partnneral review
by consor
e submitted
IECEUoject: 653371: 01/05/2015n: 33 months
653371
ii
the
tc.)
asks
and
very
whole
whole f the
f the ners, w by
rtium
d
U
5 s
i
-
D1.3 Review Contents
LIST OF TA
LIST OF FIG
EXECUTIVE
ACRONYM
1 INTRODU
1.1 Purpo
1.2 Struct
2 CIVIL- MI
2.1 Devel
2.2 Scope
2.3 Civil-
2.4 Civil-
2.5 Comp
2.6 Concl
3 EU’S CO ..................
3.1 CSDP
3.1.1 K
3.1.2 In
3.2 Civilia
3.3 Lesso
3.4 Plann
3.4.1 E
3.4.2 P
3.4.3 C
3.4.4 In
3.4.5 F
3.4.5 T
w: Civil- Milit
This project has re
ABLES .........
GURES .......
E SUMMARY
S .................
UCTION .......
ose of the de
ture of the de
LITARY REL
lopment of th
e of the inter
Military Coo
Military Coo
prehensive A
lusions .........
MPREHENS....................
P - The frame
Key policies a
nstitutions an
an and Milita
ons Learned
ning and Con
Early warning
Planning and
Command an
nformation sh
inance and P
Training .........
tary Synergie
eceived funding from
....................
....................
Y .................
....................
....................
eliverable .....
eliverable ....
LATIONS IN
he theoretica
raction .........
peration (CIM
rdination (CM
Approach (CA
....................
SIVE APPRO....................
ework of civi
and documen
nd Actors .....
ry capabilitie
Cycle .........
nducting CSD
g and situatio
decision ma
d Control (C
haring and re
Procurement
....................
es
the European Union
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
EU CRISIS
al framework
....................
MIC) ............
MCO) ...........
A) to crisis m
....................
OACH TO C....................
l-military inte
nts relevant t
....................
es .................
....................
DP missions
onal awarene
aking .............
C2) ................
eporting .......
t ...................
....................
PU
n’s Horizon 2020 rese
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
MANAGEM
for EU crisis
....................
....................
....................
management.
....................
RISIS - INTE....................
eractions with
to CSDP ......
....................
....................
....................
and operatio
ess ...............
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
earch and innovation
...................
...................
...................
...................
...................
...................
...................
ENT ............
s manageme
...................
...................
...................
...................
...................
ERNAL COO...................
hin the EU ..
...................
...................
...................
...................
ons ..............
...................
...................
...................
...................
...................
...................
n programme under g
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
ent structures
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
OPERATION....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
CSA proStart date
Duration
grant agreement No
...................
...................
...................
...................
...................
...................
...................
...................
s ..................
...................
...................
...................
...................
...................
N AND COO...................
...................
...................
...................
...................
...................
...................
...................
...................
...................
...................
...................
...................
IECEUoject: 653371: 01/05/2015n: 33 months
653371
iii
........ v
........ v
....... vi
..... viii
....... 9
..... 12
..... 12
..... 14
..... 14
..... 16
..... 18
..... 19
..... 21
..... 25
RDINATION..... 26
..... 26
..... 26
..... 30
..... 31
..... 35
..... 40
..... 40
..... 41
..... 46
..... 49
..... 49
..... 51
U
5 s
i
N
-
D1.3 Review
3.4.6 S
3.5 Civil-
3.5.1 O
3.5.2 In
3.6 Concl
4 LESSONS
4.1 Lesso
4.1.1 A
4.1.2 L
4.2 Limita
4.3 Concl
5 INTER- O
5.1 North
5.2 United
5.3 Regio
5.3.1 O
5.3.2 A
5.4 Concl
6 TOWARD
6.1 Imple
6.2 Civil-
6.3 Concl
BIBLIOGR
Key inform
Annex 1.
Annex 2.
w: Civil- Milit
This project has re
Staffing .........
military inter
Overview of th
nteraction be
lusion ..........
S FROM IMP
ons learned f
Annual report
essons ident
ations to dev
lusions .........
ORGANIZATI
Atlantic Tre
d Nations (U
onal internati
Organisation
African Union
lusions .........
DS ENHANC
mentation of
Military syne
lusions .........
RAPHY .......
mant intervie
Thematic int
Lessons ide
tary Synergie
eceived funding from
....................
raction in the
he CDSP mi
etween CSDP
....................
PLEMENTAT
from compre
ts .................
tified on CSD
eloping the c
....................
IONAL COO
aty Organisa
UN) – Europe
onal organiz
for Security a
(AU) – Euro
....................
ED COOPER
f comprehen
ergies ..........
....................
....................
ews ..............
terview ........
entified .........
es
the European Union
....................
eatre .............
ssion and op
P missions a
....................
TION OF CO
ehensive app
....................
DP civil- milit
comprehensi
....................
PERATION .
ation (NATO)
ean Union (E
zations ..........
and Co-oper
opean Union
....................
RATION AN
sive approac
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
PU
n’s Horizon 2020 rese
....................
....................
peration dep
and operation
....................
OMPREHENS
proach to CS
....................
tary interface
ive approach
....................
....................
)- European
U) ...............
....................
ration in Euro
(EU) ...........
....................
D COORDIN
ch in CSDP .
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
earch and innovation
...................
...................
loyed paralle
ns in theatre
...................
SIVE APPRO
DP ..............
...................
e ..................
h to crisis ma
...................
...................
Union (EU)
...................
...................
ope (OSCE)
...................
...................
NATION ......
...................
...................
...................
...................
...................
...................
...................
n programme under g
....................
....................
el ..................
....................
....................
OACH TO CR
....................
....................
....................
anagement ..
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
- European
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
CSA proStart date
Duration
grant agreement No
...................
...................
...................
...................
...................
RISIS ..........
...................
...................
...................
...................
...................
...................
...................
...................
...................
Union (EU) .
...................
...................
...................
...................
...................
...................
...................
...................
...................
...................
IECEUoject: 653371: 01/05/2015n: 33 months
653371
iv
..... 55
..... 57
..... 58
..... 64
..... 68
..... 69
..... 70
..... 70
..... 71
..... 79
..... 82
..... 83
..... 84
..... 92
..... 98
..... 98
... 102
... 106
... 107
... 108
... 111
... 112
... 113
... 127
........ I
...... III
U
5 s
v
-
D1.3 Review LIST OF
Table 1. De
Table 2. Co
Table 3. Ev
Table 4. Civ
Table 5. Mil
Table 6. Wh
Table 7. EU
Table 8. Th
Table 9. Ma
Table 10. In
Table 11. E
Table 12. C
Table 13. C
LIST OF
Figure 1. Im
Figure 2. EU
Figure 3. CM
Figure 4. Ci
Figure 5. Fi
Figure 6. Ph
Figure 7. Th
Figure 8. EU
Figure 9. EU
w: Civil- Milit
This project has re
TABLES
efinition of CM
omprehensive
olution of ES
vilian capabil
litary capabil
ho identifies
U level trainin
e Key Lesso
ain barriers to
nstitutional ar
U and UN m
Completed an
Civil- military s
FIGURE
mproving the
U’s Compreh
MPD decisio
ivilian and M
nancing CSD
hases for Tra
he EU Crisis
U-NATO per
U – Current N
tary Synergie
eceived funding from
S
MCO ............
e Approach-
SDP/ CSDP .
lities critical .
ities critical .
the CSDP ke
ng providers .
ons from 201
o interoperab
rrangements
missions and
nd ongoing C
synergies tha
S
EU compreh
hensive Appr
on making pro
ilitary Comm
DP Missions
aining and R
Platform .....
rmanent liaiso
NATO/EU Co
es
the European Union
....................
relevant doc
....................
....................
....................
ey lessons? .
....................
4 ..................
bility .............
s for EU-UN c
operations d
CSDP operat
at could be f
hensive appr
roach to Cris
ocedure .......
mand and Co
and Operati
ecruitment o
....................
on arrangem
ommon Area
PU
n’s Horizon 2020 rese
....................
cuments and
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
cooperation
deployed par
tions in Africa
further enhan
roach ...........
sis ................
....................
ontrol options
ion ...............
of CSDP Miss
....................
ments ...........
as of Deploy
earch and innovation
...................
d concepts ...
...................
...................
...................
...................
...................
...................
...................
...................
rallel (in Augu
a .................
nced within C
...................
...................
...................
s ..................
...................
sions and Op
...................
...................
ment ...........
n programme under g
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
ust 2015) ....
....................
CSDP ..........
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
perations .....
....................
....................
....................
CSA proStart date
Duration
grant agreement No
...................
...................
...................
...................
...................
...................
...................
...................
...................
...................
...................
...................
...................
...................
...................
...................
...................
...................
...................
...................
...................
...................
IECEUoject: 653371: 01/05/2015n: 33 months
653371
v
............... 20
............... 22
............... 28
............... 32
............... 33
............... 38
............... 52
............... 71
............... 81
............... 95
............... 96
............. 104
............. 111
............... 17
............... 24
............... 41
............... 47
............... 49
............... 51
............... 76
............... 86
............... 89
U
5 s
v
0
2
8
2
3
8
2
5
6
4
7
4
7
9
6
6
9
-
D1.3 Review EXECUT
European to its internto tackle aenhance tForeign SeEU to takinternation
Purposefuland militarEU’s confliis not aboudevelopmecombinatioand coherappropriategreatest deagency, bleveraging
This deliveproject, whcapabilitiescapabilitiesoutline thecontributininstrumentreport is tinstrument
To achieveand panelissue. As amilitary fuideologicallevel, suchinterventioconductingoperationsoperation sufficient cactors. In cooperatioincluding accommod
w: Civil- Milit
This project has re
TIVE SUM
Union (EU)national coua complex che visibilityecurity Policke a leadinal security.
l coordinatiory ones, is pict manageut creating nent processon of the fulrent mannee. Promotinegree possut rather a, synchroniz
erable “Revihich aims s. This is ds and idente existing pg to the its that are that efficients that are o
e the object discussiona result, wenctions is l facets. A nh as, a lackns, a lack
g and suppos, and at oobjectives,
communicaaddition, a
on and cooareas suc
dation, War
tary Synergie
eceived funding from
MMARY
) is a uniqueunter partnecrisis. Com
y, impact acy objectiveg role in p
on and cooperceived toment effortsnew structuses. It is all range of aer, thereby ng this culible, to resias tools ofzing, and a
iew: civil- mto enhancedone by idtify the potractices of dentificatioachieved t
nt conflict operating, if
tives set fon were cone found out
a complenumber or bk of a uniteof coordina
orting a CSoperational
absence otion system
a number oordination ch as, Strrehouses, T
es
the European Union
e actor in coers. It has v
mbining the nd efficienc
es. The Compeace-keep
operation beo be of utms. The aim
ures nor newbout ackno
available careinforcing
ture of coost seeing th
f the EU’s pplying them
military synee the effecdentifying htential for pcivil- militan of potenthrough EUprevention not integra
r this repornducted thet that coopex challeng
barriers to ind policy lination betwe
SDP missionl level, suof common
m that woulf areas whebetween Crategic Co
Transportati
PU
n’s Horizon 2020 rese
onflict prevevast potentia
strengths ocy of EU’s mmon Secuping operati
etween the most importa
of the civil-w mechanisowledging oapabilities ag the desirordination heir capabilpower to
m.
ergies” is a fctiveness ofhow to incrpooling andry coopera
ntial synergU’s compreh
requires pated, in a co
rt an extensereby gainieration ande with nunteroperabie among theen EU insn/ operationch as, ins
n training ald enable sere added
CSDP civiliaommunicatioon, Security
earch and innovation
ention and cality in comof both miliinterventio
urity and Deions, confli
different EUance for themilitary coo
sms, nor abone anothend resourcered progresrequires thlities and reachieve th
first step in f the Europrease the id sharing. Ttion and cogies betwehensive appparallel depooperative a
sive desk reng a comp coordinatiomerous strlity could behe memberstitutions ann and the isufficient ca
and recruitmsecure inforvalue couldan and mon, Informy arrangem
n programme under g
crisis manabining civiliitary and cins, thereby
efence Policct preventio
U actors, nae coherenceoperation/c
bout merginger’s competes and use ss and cree interagen
esources ashe desired
the implempean UnionnteroperabiThe aim of oordination en CSDP proach. Theployment oand coordina
esearch, keprehensive on betweenructural, poe identified states whe
nd with parssue of fundapabilities tment standarmation shad be achievilitary functation shar
ments, Comm
CSA proStart date
Duration
grant agreement No
gement in can and miliivilian capay supportincy (CSDP) eon and str
amely betwe and effici
coordinationg respectivtences, idethem in a c
eate synergncy membs belongingoutcome b
mentation of n’s conflict ility of resof this delivewithin CSDcivilians a
e prerequisof military aative manne
ey informantunderstand
n the EU’s olitical, tecat politica
en it comesrtners whending the mito reach thards and aaring betweved throughtions werering/dialogumon Medic
IECEUoject: 653371: 01/05/2015n: 33 months
653371
vi
comparisontary means
abilities cang the EU’senables therengthening
een civilianency of the
n imperativee capabilityntifying thecoordinatedgies whereers, to the to a singleby sharing,
the IECEUprevention
ources anderable is toDP, therebyand militarysite for thisand civilianer.
t interviewsding of thecivilian and
chnical andl- strategics to militaryn planning,issions and
he mission/a lack of aeen the EUh enhanced identified,e, Shared
cal facilities,
U
5 s
i
n s n s e g
n e e y e d e e e ,
U n d o y y s n
s e d d c y ,
d / a U d ,
d ,
-
D1.3 Review Common process an This deliverelevant toand coordishort-term practises fthe interacparallel. Cto cooperaChapter 5 internation
w: Civil- Milit
This project has re
pre-deploynd Security
erable is divo civil- militaination prac
(operationfrom the coction betweehapter 4 dis
ation and coreviews theal actors ou
tary Synergie
eceived funding from
yment and provision o
vided into 4ary relationsctises withinnal) confliconduct of Cen CSDP mscussed CSoordination e intra-institutlining the
es
the European Union
“on-theatrof the CSDP
4 chapters s in CSDP. n EU’s crisisct preventioSDP missio
missions anSDP’s lesso
between cutional cooexisting pra
PU
n’s Horizon 2020 rese
re” trainingP staff.
(Chapters 2Chapter 3
s managemon instrumons and opnd operationons learnedcivilian and peration an
actises.
earch and innovation
g, Mutual/I
2-5). Chaptexamines t
ment structuents, in p
perations. Tns which had process a
military crisnd coordinat
n programme under g
ntegrated
ter 2 discusthe intra- inres, focusinarticular, a
This chapterave been ond key lesssis managetion betwee
CSA proStart date
Duration
grant agreement No
civil-military
sses the kenstitutional cng on the inanalysing tr includes a
operating insons identifement capaen CSDP an
IECEUoject: 653371: 01/05/2015n: 33 months
653371
vii
y Lessons
ey conceptscooperationnteraction inthe currentanalyses of the region
fied, relatedabilities andnd the main
U
5 s
i
s
s n n t f
n d d n
-
D1.3 Review
ACRONY
ACRONYM
AU BiH C2 CA CFSP CiLMA CivCom CivOpsCdrCMC CMPD CONOPS CPCC CSDP CSO
DEVCO
ECHO
EDA EEAS ELMA ESS ESDC ESDP EU del EUMC EUMS EUSR FFM FSJ HQ
HR/VP
ISB LI LL LMG MSO
w: Civil- Milit
This project has re
YMS
MS
AfrBosCoCoCoCivCo
r CivCriCriCoCivCoCivDirandHuas EuEuEUEuEuEuEuEuEUEuFacFreHeHigPoInteLesLesLesMil
tary Synergie
eceived funding from
rican Union snia and Hemmand andmprehensivmmon Fore
vilian Lessommittee for
vilian Operasis Managesis Managencept of Op
vilian Plannimmon Secu
vilian Straterectorate Ged Developmmanitarian the Europeropean Defropean Exte
UMS Lessonropean Secropean Secropean Secropean Unioropean Unio
U Military Staropean Unioct Finding Meedom, Secadquarter
gh Represelicy/Vice-Prelligence Stssons Identssons Learnssons Manaitary Strateg
es
the European Union
erzegovinad Control ve Approacheign and Sens Manager the Civilianation Commement Concement and Pperations ing and Conurity and Degic Optionseneral for In
ment Aid and Civan Commu
fence Agencernal Actionns Managemcurity Stratecurity and Dcurity and Don Delegation Military Caff on Special
Mission curity and Ju
ntative of thresident of tteering Boatified ned agement Bogic Options
PU
n’s Horizon 2020 rese
h ecurity Policement Applicn Aspects o
mander cept Planning Di
nduct Capaefence Polics nternational
vil Protectiounity Humancy n Service ment Applicegy Defence ColDefence Polion Committee
Representa
ustice
he Union forthe Europea
ard
oard s
earch and innovation
cy cation of Crisis Ma
rectorate
ability cy
Cooperatio
on (formerly nitarian Aid
cation
lege icy
ative
r Foreign Afan Commiss
n programme under g
nagement
on
known Office)
ffairs and Ssion
CSA proStart date
Duration
grant agreement No
Security
IECEUoject: 653371: 01/05/2015n: 33 months
653371
viii
U
5 s
i
-
D1.3 Review MIP NATO NGO OHQ OpCdr OPCEN OPLAN OSCE PFCA PRT PSC PSOR SIAC SASE SitCen SME SOR SSR TEU UN UNSC
w: Civil- Milit
This project has re
MisNoNoOpOpOpOpOrgPoProPoProSinSafSituSmStaSecTreUnUn
tary Synergie
eceived funding from
ssion Implerth Atlantic n-Governm
peration Heaperation Comperations Ceperations Plaganisation flitical Frameovincial Reclitical and Sovisional Stangle Intelligefe and Secuuation Cent
mall and Medatement of Rcurity Secto
eaty on Euroited Nationsited Nations
es
the European Union
mentation PTreaty Org
mental Organadquartersmmander entre an for Security ework for CconstructionSecurity Comatement Of ence Analysure Environtre dium- sizedRequiremenor Reform opean Unios s Security C
PU
n’s Horizon 2020 rese
Plan anisation nization
and Co-opCrisis Appron Team mmittee f Requiremeses Capacit
nment
d Entreprisents
on
Council
earch and innovation
eration in Each
ents ty
es
n programme under g
Europe
CSA proStart date
Duration
grant agreement No
IECEUoject: 653371: 01/05/2015n: 33 months
653371
ix
U
5 s
x
-
D1.3 Review
InternationGiven the terrorism, protracted the effectsmigratory security, reresources all relevantstronger tguaranteedmultilateraand militar
The need the improvrecognisedresolution in solving cCommon objectives to ‘preservUkraine anpreventativcomprehenfragile andarray of exexternal coincluding rmeasures and civilian
1 Cornelius AGenshagen, 2 The ongoinground. In adjoint action fr3 The CSDP states discusvisibility and 4 Article 21, E326/01, 26.105 “Internationapproach”, Ecrisis-manag
w: Civil- Milit
This project has re
1 INTR
nal crisis mnew threattraditional conflicts. 1
s of climateflows, illici
egional conremain undt civilian anthan ever. d by the lism and a
ry instrumen
for the incrved effectivd.3 Evolvingof the crisecurrent issuSecurity anof the EU’s
ve peace, prnd strugglesve action mnsive approd conflict-afxternal poliooperation regular polit(sanctions)
n and milita
Adebahr, The C
2011). g fight against
ddition, it is evrom various inwas on the ag
ssed how to enimpact of the
European Unio0.2012. al Cooperatio
European Comement/links-b
tary Synergie
eceived funding from
ODUCTIO
managementts emanatin
peacekeepAs global c
e change ait trafficking
nflicts, radicder pressurd military inAs evolve
effort of anetworked
nts to be ap
eased interveness, visg crises ares in its neig
ues in the glnd Defence
s external acrevent confls in fighting may not aloach to exteffected contcies, instruinstrumentstical dialogu), EU Specry crisis ma
Comprehensiv
t Islamic Statevident that Eurternal and extgenda of the mnhance defencCSDP. on. Treaty on
on and Develommission, acce
etween-secur
es
the European Union
ON
t has undeng from fragping has fchallenges and degradg, energy
calisation ane, the case
nstruments ed crises a single nad approach,plied in a co
roperability ibility and ie putting thghbourhood lobal securie Policy (Cction as out
flicts and strtransnation
lways be pernal conflictexts. In orments and s, to actionues with thicial Represeanagement
ve Approach t
e (ISIS) in the rope’s refugeeternal securitymeeting of Couce capabilities
European Un
pment- Securessed 5 Septerity-and-develo
PU
n’s Horizon 2020 rese
ergone a mgile states, frequently continue to
dation of nasecurity, n
nd terrorisme for a com- be they exhave showation or a, combiningoherent and
of existing impact of te EU’s cap to a test, aity arena byCSDP) is tlined in Artrengthen intnal terrorismpossible orcts and crisrder to add
tools at itss under theird countrieentatives, dmissions un
to Crisis Mana
Middle-East he crises demany actors. uncil of the Eus, strengthen t
ion (Consolida
rity and develoember 2015, hopment_en.
earch and innovation
major transitasymmetri
given way o rise in numatural resounatural disam, et ceteraprehensive xternal or inwn, securityactor aloneg in the besd coordinate
civilian andthe EU’s epability to cand the needy increasingnow more ticle 21, of tternational s
m and evolvr successfuses is criticadress these s disposal, e Common s and inter
disarmamennder the CS
agement in Co
has brought fonds, not only c
uropean Unionthe defence in
ated version 2
opment, conflicttps://ec.europ
n programme under g
tion over thc conflicts,
to complember and inurces, popuasters, cyba, and as e
approach mnternal policy and dev2. Instead, st possible ed manner.
d military caxternal acti
contribute tod for the EU
g the efficiencurrent th
he Treaty osecurity’. As
ving asylum ul. Thereforal for an effe
challengesranging froForeign Se
national orgnt and non-SDP.5
oncerted Weim
orces from sevcooperation be
n, December 2ndustry and im
2012), Docume
ct prevention apa.eu/europea
CSA proStart date
Duration
grant agreement No
he past twoorganised
ex peace ncrease in ulation pres
ber securityeconomic anmaking optcy instrumenvelopment it can beway all av
.
apabilities inions has bo the stabilU to take a gncy and visan ever. O
on Europeans the on-go crisis havere, advancfective EU rs, the EU hom diplomaecurity Poliganisations-proliferation
mar Effort, (Sti
veral nations tetween countr
2013, when thmprove the effe
ent Number 2
and compreheaid/policies/fra
IECEUoject: 653371: 01/05/2015n: 33 months
653371
9
o decades.crime, andbuilding incomplexity;ssures andy, maritimend financialimal use ofnts - is nowcannot be
enefit fromvailable civil
n CSDP forbeen widelyisation andgreater roleibility of the
One of then Union4, ising crisis in
e shown thecing a trulyresponse inhas a wide
acy and EUcy (CFSP),
s, restrictiven activities,
ftung
o the same ries, but also
e heads of ectiveness,
012/C
ensive agility-and-
U
5 s
9
. d n ; d e l f
w e m
l
r y d e e e s n e y n e U , e ,
-
D1.3 Review The experWar led thadopt a porather a seCSDP misleading rointernationbroad rancomprehenSince 2003operationainstrumentcomprehen
The term ‘has emergTo date, thdifferent wand militarall actors agencies, the EU’s cendeavour
Despite thcurrent insimplementmilitary fuManagemeintegrationfor a lackimplement
Being ableand politiccoordinatioincrease tTherefore, interoperabthe strengt
6 Roy H. GinsPalgrave Stu7 It was state2004, that “asordination be8 Panel of Ex9 Directorate-Civil- military
w: Civil- Milit
This project has re
rience of wae EU to devolitical comet of procedsions and o
ole in peacal security.
nge of forensive appro3 the EU h
al engagemts togethernsive appro
‘comprehenged from dishere is no u
ways; varyinry actors to in crisis areas well as, comprehensr to achieve
e political wstitutional ration of conctions in ent Plannin of civil and
k of a comation of a c
e to work tocal questionon betweenthe efficien understanbility of the ths and we
sberg & Susan
udies in Europeed by Council os the Union is
etween militaryxperts (EEAS O- General for e
y coordination
tary Synergie
eceived funding from
ar and re-evelop its ca
mmitment todures and coperations acekeeping o The logic
eign policyoach towarhas launcheent, the EUr as its paoach to crisi
nsive approscussions ouniversal deg from a sia larger uneas includitrade and esive approa
e synergies
will to strenreality, cleaomprehensi
CSDP havng Directod military ap
mprehensiveomprehens
ogether in cn. Accordin
n the civilianncy of intending the EU’s civilia
eaknesses f
n E. Penska, ean Union Poof the Europea
s pursuing a coy and civilian cOfficials), 16 Jexternal policieand the future
es
the European Union
emerged ethpabilities fo
o prevent vcapabilities are an impooperations, and princip instrumen
rds crisis med some 32U has tried articular sts managem
ach’ was non the integefinition andmple under
nderstandingng the dipleconomic inach to crisibetween m
ngthen syner separatiove approacve been mrate (CMPpproaches, e planning sive approac
oherence isng to seven and militaernational key eleme
n and militafrom a man
The Europeanlitics, 2012), 3an Union in Thomprehensivecomponents wJune 2015; Intes, Policy Depe of the EU OH
PU
n’s Horizon 2020 rese
hnic and poor crisis respiolent confl designed tortant instru
conflict prple behind nts. 6 CSDmanagemen2 peace misto present trength, wh
ment.
not coined igration of civd the concerstanding ofg of the neeomatic repnstruments.is, particulailitary and c
ergies betwon to civiliach to crisis
made inter PD). Despit
this new bstructure,
ch to a crisi
s however neral studiesary actors h
conflict prents enabary crisis managing civil-
n Union in Glo31-32. he European
e approach to will be requiredterview with a partment, ConHQ, (Brussels
earch and innovation
olitical confponse withiicts. CSDPto improve
ument in CFrevention athe CSDP
DP is alsont, drawing ssions and its ability tohich is on
n EU devevilian and mpt is interprf a need toed for coordresentation. From the arly in the civilian parts
een civilianan and milis.8 Some e
alia througte being a
body has nowhich is
is.9
not only ans and evalas been re
revention aling and oanagement- military in
obal Security, t
Union Exerciscrisis managed.” EUTM Mali O
nsolidating thes, European Pa
n programme under g
licts in the n the frame
P is not a sand compl
FSP, enablinand in the is to expan an integron civilianoperations
o deploy boe of the
lopment pomilitary comreted depen
promote sydination and, humanitaroutset, a ccontext of s of EU inte
n and militatary structu
efforts to bgh the fouan importaot been ableperceived
institutionauation repocognized to
and crisis on the othinstrument
terface can
the politics of
se Concept, 93ement, a stron
Officer, 23 Sepe EU’s Crisis Marliament: 201
CSA proStart date
Duration
grant agreement No
aftermath oework of CSstand-aloneete EU foreng the Uniostrengthen
nd the EU ral part ofn and militas. From theoth civilian amain featu
olicymakingmponents in nding on theynergies bed joint efforrian and de
central charaCSDP, has
erventions7.
ary parts in ures, have ridge the cndation of
ant step toe to provideto be cruc
al, but ratheorts, coopeo be importmanageme
her hand ts is crucial.n significant
impact, (Grea
329/04 MV/RMng synergy and
ptember 2015.Management S12) 10.
IECEUoject: 653371: 01/05/2015n: 33 months
653371
10
of the ColdSDP, and toe policy buteign policy.on to take aning of thetoolkit to a
f the EU'sary assets. start of itsand militaryures of its
circles butthe CSDP.
e context inetween civilrts betweenevelopmentacteristic ofs been the
CSDP, thehinder the
civilian andthe Crisis
owards thee a solutioncial for the
er a culturaleration andant tools toent efforts.preventing
. Identifyingtly increase
at Britain:
M 1, 7.5. d co-
. Structures:
U
5 s
0
d o t .
a e a s . s y s
t .
n l
n t f
e
e e d s e n e
l d o .
g g e
-
D1.3 Review the efficiensecurity thstates, forpreventive
To contribcapabilitiescoordinatiothe emergito implemecivil- militaCompreheComprehethe need t
The reportthe plannisearched ito the impocoherent interoperabpost- Lisbo
In additioncivil- militainterventiorelations b(ECHO) ascope of tTherefore, military fuHeadquartbetween m
10 Fernanda beyond, ESDdifferent contfurther discusis argued thainterests) it isall, commit tcomplex andApproach remobilize in econsuming ininterests. As focus and effstates’ attent11 In this repoEUTM Mali a
w: Civil- Milit
This project has re
ncy of the reats in the
rce the comand sustai
bute to bus in CSDPon within CSing challengent it throug
ary synergieensive Appensive Appto enhance
t aims at enng of an on the areasortance of and resoubility, exploon Treaty se
n, this reporary coopens to conflic
between CSnd Developthis report this study nctions in
ters (operamission/oper
Faria discuss
DP”, ECDMP text. The apprssed in this reat in the absens difficult for ato its rapid imd fluid situationquires significevery contextn the EU contea result of po
forts towards tion and prioritort the followinand EUCAP SA
tary Synergie
eceived funding from
EU’s interv European
mmunity to nable mann
ild up-to-daP, this repoSDP. To prges surroungh civil- mi
es, referringproach to proach is ue cooperati
nhancing unoperation as where sev‘using the f
urce efficieres key lessetting.
rt provides ration andcts. Even thSDP missiopment (DEVwill be limreviews thethe EEAS
ational leveration and o
sed in her artic
Briefing Noteroach used in eport chapter 2nce of a senseall relevant EUmplementationn makes a shcant amounts. It entails a ext, given its iolitical and ‘orga Comprehentization tends ng CSDP missAHEL Mali an
es
the European Union
ventions. Tsoil, and thlook for n
ner.
ate undersort outlinesrovide an onding the colitary coope to it as coCSDP mis
understoodon and coo
nderstandinnd mission
veral missiofull potentiaent mannesons of usin
an overviewcoordinat
hough the Cons/ operatVCO) and
mited to thee areas of
S structuresl), as well other interna
cle “What EU e, No. 71. (20
IECEU, is ba2.5 Comprehee of urgency (eU actors (institn. Even in crishared understas of human re
process of cnstitutional coganizational’ r
nsive Approacto focus on su
sions and oped EUNAVFOR
PU
n’s Horizon 2020 rese
The issue ce strained dew solution
standing ons current poverall undeomprehensieration/cooroperation assions andd from a “nordination
ng on how tn, as well ans and ope
al of the exir, the stung civil- mil
w of the ketion from Comprehenstions and Emore and
e examinaticooperations (political-
as, inter-ational acto
Comprehens014), the issuased on the Coensive Approae.g. crisis or ctutions and msis situations,anding and pesources, tim
coordination aomplexity and realism, and gh will be hijacuch situations.rations are revR Atalanta, EU
earch and innovation
could not bdefence andns to maint
n EU’s effopractises oferstanding ove approacrdination. Tand coordind operationarrowed pebetween c
the Compreas how synerations havsting capab
udy also iditary assets
ey conceptsplanning tsive ApproaEU delegatmore interon of civil-n and coord- strategic institutiona
ors.
ive Approach?ue of how Coomprehensiveach (CA) to crconflict and a ember states), as for instaolicy approac
me investment and articulatio
diversity of acgiven the EU’scked by crisis . viewed; EUFOUTM Somalia
n programme under g
e more cud security btain securit
orts to expf civil- miliof the topic,ch to a crisisThe report aation, from
ns, and, therspective”
civilian and
ehensive apnergies withve been in thbilities’ to redentifies th
s in a compr
s and proceo implemeach in practtions, Comnal security-military syndination bet
level), Opal cooperat
? Challenges mprehensive
e Approach to isis managemclear perceptio) to agree on nce in Syria, h difficult. In aand expertis
n that is evectors, policiess capacity conand conflict si
OR and EUPMand EUCAP N
CSA proStart date
Duration
grant agreement No
rrent, as thbudgets of tty in a cos
ploit its civitary coope, this reports and how taddresses ta perspect
hus, in th”, which em
d military fu
pproach is phin CSDP he area parespond to ahe main rehensive m
edures releventation of tise also encmission Huy functions nergies wittween the peration Cetion and c
for the EU acApproach is Conflicts and
ment.) Accordinon of threat toa joint strategtoo many int
addition, a Cose that the En more comp, instruments,nstraints, it is ituations, bec
M in Bosnia-HeNestor.
IECEUoject: 653371: 01/05/2015n: 33 months
653371
11
he evolvinghe Member
st- efficient,
vil- militaryeration andt discussedthe EU triesthe topic oftive of EU’shis report,mphasisesunctions.10
practised inhave been
rallel.11 Duea crisis in abarriers tomanner in a
vant for thethe EU’s
compassesumanitarian
(FSJ), thethin CSDP.civilian andentres and
coordination
ction plan andinterpreted in Crisis (this isng to which, ito common EUgy and, aboveterests and aomprehensiveU can hardly
plex and time priorities andlikely that theause member
erzegovina,
U
5 s
g r ,
y d d s f s ,
s
n n e a o a
e s s n e .
d d n
d n s t
U e a e y e d e r
-
D1.3 Review
The IECEsuccessfulobjective oand coordidiscussioncreating a
The delivereview of ostate- of thcoordinatiorange of exas informa
Deliverablecoordinatiooverview fmissions abetween mas well as
In chapter aim of outlof civil- milto civil-miinstitutiona
Chapter 3 This chaptfunctions iterm (operthe condupreventingstrategic a
12 E-InternatiBlog, A EuroEurope blog,http://www.lehttps://www.fLinkedIn Gro13 The intervi14 Interviews
w: Civil- Milit
This project has re
1.1 Pur
U –project civilian- m
of the IECEUination withs, we aim foundation
rable is buion-going dishe art literaton in crisis mxperts (milit
al conversat
e 1.3. buildon within Cfor those sand operatiomissions and
enablers fo
1.2 Str
2, an overvlining the imlitary interfailitary inter
alisation of C
discusses ter outlines n EU. This
rational) conuct of CSD and enab
and operatio
onal Relations
opean Think T June 29, 201
elundin.org/; Cfacebook.comoup, accessed ew template isand news from
tary Synergie
eceived funding from
rpose of t
supports Eilitary synerU- project b
hin CSDP. Tat ensurin
for the latte
lt on existinscussion inture, as wemanagemetary and civions in pers
ds on the aCSDP. The
eeking deeons. The ded operation
or the intero
ucture of
view of the mplications ace within thraction andCSDP.
the intra- ithe institutio
s chapter fonflict prevenDP missionbling the foonal level,
s, E-Internatio
Tank for Globa5, https://isise
Civil- Military c/groups/670468 July, 2015,
s Annex 1 - Tm 2015.
es
the European Union
the delive
EU by focurgies. The sby outlining Through extng the topicer case stud
g knowledg Media inclll as policy nt missions
vilian) were son, by pho
above by inadded val
eper underseliverable os and undeperability of
the deliv
institutionaof the ‘Hun
he EU. In ad how the
institutionalonal and leg
ocuses on tntion instrum and operstering of cthe chapte
onal Relations.al Action (Blog)europe.wordprcooperation’s F65432974396https://www.li
hematic Interv
PU
n’s Horizon 2020 rese
erable
using on castudy ‘Civil-the key isstensive descality, accu
dies conduc
ge. Before tluding sociapaper prac
s and operaconsulted tne and ema
ntroducing tue of this standing ofoutlines theerlines the mf civilian an
verable
alisation of Cntingon’ andddition, chae interface
cooperatiogal settingsthe civil-milments, in parations. By civil- militarr will contri
.com, June 29g), June 26, 20ress.com/; LarFacebook gro
6/; Civil- Militarinkedin.com/gview.
earch and innovation
apturing an military synues related
sk study, keuracy and cted.
he deliveraal media, bctise relatedations withinthrough semail.
the blocks particular df existing14c existing an
main institutd military fu
CSDP strucd ‘Janowitzapter 2 appe has em
on and coos relevant foitary coope
articular, anoutlining
ry coordinaibute to the
9, 2015, http://015, http://fridrs Lundin, Lelup, accessed ry Interaction agroups/810042
n programme under g
nd exploitinnergies’ conto solid civ
ey informantrelevance
ble was wrilogs and di
d to civil- mn the EU, wami- structure
of civil- mildeliverable civil- militarnd potentialtional and ounctions und
ctures is brieian’ modelsroaches theerged and
rdination pror the coorderation and alysing the some of th
ation within e latter Wor
/www.e-ir.info/e.org/blog/taglundin.com, Ju13 July, 2015
and EU Secur24.
CSA proStart date
Duration
grant agreement No
ng the bestntributes to
vil- military ct interviewsof the stud
tten, a comscussions pilitary coopeas undertaked interview
litary coopeis that it p
ry synergiel areas of c
organisationder the CSD
efly discusss to the unde key conced is appli
ractises witdination of c
coordinatiocurrent prahe emergin CSDP at rking packa
/category/blogg/csdp/; ISIS Eune 26, 2015,
5, rity & Defence
IECEUoject: 653371: 01/05/2015n: 33 months
653371
12
t and most the overallcooperations and paneldy, thereby
mprehensiveplatforms12,eration andken. A wide
ws13, as well
eration andprovides ans in CSDPcooperationnal barriers,DP.
sed with anderstandingepts relateded to the
thin CSDP.civil- militaryon in short-actices fromng lessonsa political-
ages of the
gs/; The Fride Europe, Isis
e Forum’s
U
5 s
2
t l
n l
y
e ,
d e l
d n P n ,
n g d e
. y -
m s - e
-
D1.3 Review project buithe civil- mexpert pansupport anlearned frochapter 5, namely theone of the interoperabsynergies c
w: Civil- Milit
This project has re
lding on themilitary synenel discussind crisis maom coordinthe civil- m
e UN, NATOpriority arebility betwecould be de
tary Synergie
eceived funding from
e identificatergies in CSons; utilizin
anagement. ation/coope
military coopO, OSCE aas for enha
een civilian eveloped.
es
the European Union
tion and anaSDP. The ang the expe
Chapter 4 eration betwperation andnd AU, is d
anced efficieand military
PU
n’s Horizon 2020 rese
alysis of theanalysis arertise of procomplemen
ween EU’s d coordinatidiscussed, aency. Chapry actors wi
earch and innovation
e possibilitie primarily cminent civilnts chapter crisis mana
ion betweenas working pter 6 reviewithin CSDP
n programme under g
es, opportuconducted thian and mil3 by highligagement acn the CSDPwith partne
ws the main, as well as
CSA proStart date
Duration
grant agreement No
nities and phrough intelitary experghting the kctors withinP and its keers is recogn findings tos areas wh
IECEUoject: 653371: 01/05/2015n: 33 months
653371
13
potential forerviews andrts in peacekey lessonsn CSDP. Iney partners,nised to be
o barriers tohere further
U
5 s
3
r d e s n ,
e o r
-
D1.3 Review
There are armed forcfor the manproper civinfluenced Professionare a sort obetter undwith a briediscussionmanageme
There are describe thin efforts Cooperatiotwo concepmilitary milevel, whestrategic le
Based on CIMIC, CMactors in Ewhere theychapter alsmilitary cooefforts.
2.1 Devestructure
The deveHungtingto
15 See for exa(Routledge: O24/7 Joint EffSecurity Stud16 Samuel HuMassachuset17 Morris Jan18 Huntingtonin order to creand physical arranged to s
w: Civil- Milit
This project has re
2 CIVIL
vast studieces should nagement ovilian contr
by two wonal Soldier: Aof blueprinterstanding ef discussi on the coent.
several cohe relationsto intercon
on (CIMIC),pts can be ssion relatereas the C
evel, also co
the availabMCO, CA) EU by outliy are usualso shortly ooperation/c
lopment oes
lopment ofon’s and Jan
ample: RobertOxon, 2009); Sffort for Stabilitdies”, (Oxford:untington, Thetts: Harvard Uowitz, A Socia
n’s model for ceate effective separation of
separate units
tary Synergie
eceived funding from
L- MILITAR
es on civil- mbe arrange
of civil-militarol. The unorks: The SA Social ant for the inston the devon on the oncepts re
ncepts or tos between thnnect civil , and Civil- made: CIMed to coope
CMCO referovering the
ble literaturused to deining the mly applied w
outlines howoordination
of the the
f the EU’snowitzian w
t Egnell, CompSebastiaan J.ty, (Hampshire: Oxford Univee Soldier and tUniversity Presal and Politicacivil- military rearmed forces
f the military as, with limited v
es
the European Union
RY RELAT
military inteed and manary relationsnderstandinSoldier andnd Political Ptitutionalizatvelopment o
theoreticallated to ci
ools that arhe civilian aand militaMilitary Co
IC is a militeration betwrs to the inimplementa
e, this chaescribe the main differewithin the Ew the implem practices s
oretical f
s crisis maworks on civ
plex Peace OpH. Rietjens ane: Netherlandsersity Press, 2the State: Thess, 1957). l Portrait, (Gle
elations, whichs it must be unnd civilian sphvertical interac
PU
n’s Horizon 2020 rese
TIONS IN
rfaces.15 Thnaged withins has been ng of the d the State Portrait (196tion of the Eof the EU’sl frameworkvil- military
re used byand militaryary approacoordination tary functionween differenternal cooration of EU
pter aims ascope of tnces betwe
EU. Becausmentation osupport the
framework
anagementvil- military r
Operations andnd Myriame T.s Defence Aca
2007). e Theory and P
encoe, Ill., Freh is still referrender proper civheres.” In pracction at other t
earch and innovation
EU CRISI
hese studien a societyhow to creeffective o(1957) fro
60) written EU’s crisis s civil- militak on civil-y relations
EU and oty sides. Twoches to cri(CMCO). A
n, which is pent actors rdination ofactions in c
at the explathe interacteen the cose CSDP isof the comp
EU’s long a
k for EU c
t structuresrelations.18 E
d Civil-Military .I.B. Bollen edademy, 2008)
Politics of Civi
ee Press, 1960ed to as the “nvilian control actical terms, ththan managem
n programme under g
IS MANAG
s have ofte. The traditate effectiveorganizationm Samuel by Morris Jmanagemeary structurmilitary intwithin pea
her internato concepts isis managA clear distiprimarily a sin the field f EU actioncrisis manag
anation of tion betweencepts, and
s an instrumrehensive aand short-te
crisis man
s have beEspecially,
Relations: Win., Managing c; Alan Collins
il-Military Rela
0). normal theory,and there mushis means thatment level. Th
CSA proStart date
Duration
grant agreement No
GEMENT
en focused tional point e military fon has beeHuntington
anowitz17. Tent structureres, this chaterface folloacekeeping
tional organare usually
gement: Civinction betwsupport funat operatio
ns at the pgement.
the key coen civilian ad explainin
ment under approach therm conflict
nagement
een impactHuntington
inning the Peacivil- military coed., “Contemp
ations, (Cambr
” is based on st be ”a strict idt the civilian a
he “Janowitzia
IECEUoject: 653371: 01/05/2015n: 33 months
653371
14
on how theof concern
orces underen stronglyn16 and theTheir workses. To get aapter startsowed by a
and crisis
nizations to mentionedvil- Militaryween thesection to the
onal-tacticalpolitical and
ncepts (i.e.and militaryg how andCFSP, this
hrough civil-t prevention
t
ed by the’s work has
ace, ooperation- A porary
ridge,
an idea that deological nd military is n model” of
U
5 s
4
e n r y e s a s a s
o d y e e l
d
. y d s -n
e s
-
D1.3 Review influenced and has thplayed a c21st centurwas that idecreasedMaintainingstates, whoit would hamilitary remanagemeunit to the
The 9/11 internationstates.20 Tsince 2003crisis manafostering thand militaralso be trcompetitivebe used pacoordinatio“Hunginton
This idea need for cinstrumentexperienceteams of challengescapacity. Dadded to o
civil- military cause for thechange of rolcivilian controofficer corps’establishmencultural barrie19 Per Martin Organisationhttp://eiop.or.20 Katherine relations in aKatherine Mo
21 Janowitz, A22 Norheim- M
w: Civil- Milit
This project has re
how civil-mhus influenccentral role ry. A pre-cot would no the needg NATO aso are also aave a stron
elations haent structurcivilian dom
event impaal security
This new se3, changed agement sthe effectivery is enhancraced in the advantagearallel to mon’ within thns” institutio
has becomcomprehensts of power.e has showpeople wit
s, i.e. fillingDue to the once peace
relations alrea
e military to cale of armed fool and effectiv. This cannot
nt on civil socieers between thNorheim-Mar Fit for Purpos.at/eiop/texte/2Morton and Ja post-9/11 woorton, (Canber
A Social and PMartinsen, “M
tary Synergie
eceived funding from
military relatced on the in the insti
ondition for ot weaken to continus the majoa part of theng voice onve also b
re, which reminant instit
acted the dy, shifting fecurity conte
the percepttructures. Ja
eness of theced by breae Europeae is its abilitilitary oneshe EU fore
onal settings
me relevant sive strateg As Norheim
wn that effeth various g immediatecomplexity e is restore
ady acknowled
arry out the tasorces, added ave use of the abe achieved tety. Accordinghe military prortinsen, “Manase”, European2010-010a.htmacinta O’Haga
orld” in Humanrra: The Austr
Political PortraManaging the C
es
the European Union
tions are apdevelopmetutionalizatideveloping
NATO. Adue the devr internatioe allies, as wn European
been charaesulted in adution.19
evelopmenfrom robusext, togethetion on the anowitz21 d
e armed forcaking down n Security ty to deploy. These exp
eign policy s to tackle a
in the contgies, plannm- Martinse
ective crisis professiona
e security gof the con
ed, but nee
dged the obstsks in changeda new set of rearmed forces chrough separa
g to ‘Janowitz ofession and thaging the Civil-n Integration om (Accessed an, “Humanitarnitarianism andralian National
ait. Civil-Military In
PU
n’s Horizon 2020 rese
pproached aent of the Nion of the Eg the EU’s dditionally,velopment nal militarywell as of thn Security acterized bdding a we
nt of the intst peace-keer with lessappropriate
discussed thces requirethe culturalStrategy (
y a large nuperiences hinstruments
a complex c
text of peaning and coen (2010)22
managemeal backgrogaps, whiletemporary
eds to be in
tacles that a std security envequirements tocan only be acation, due to tmodel’ the idehe rest of soc-Military Interf
online Papers (18 August 201rianism then ad civil– militaryl University, 20
nterface in the
earch and innovation
and organizNATO and EEU’s foreignown militarthe Berlin of EU's in
y player wahe United Sissues. They the abs
ell-organized
ternational eeping towsons learnedeness of strhe same iss that the intl and structu(ESS), in wmber of diff
have led to s, thereby crisis.
ce building ommand arconcludes ent requireunds who e, at the sacrisis, civilinvolved alre
trict separatio
vironment. Jano the military pchieved by polthe inevitable eal civil-militariety. face in the EU(EIoP), Specia15) and now: Exply relations in a009), 1-7.
e EU”
n programme under g
zed in mostEU structuren security ary crisis maPlus agree
ndependentas in the inStates, who e developmence of ad military st
communitywards the s
d from CSDrictly separasue alreadyteroperabilitural barrierswhich it is ferent civiliathe need toquestioning
and stabilirrangementin his analys a quick rcan addre
ame time, an instrumeeady during
n of planning a
nowitz, arguedprofession. Aclitical integratiopolitical and sry interface, w
: Creating an al Issue Vol. 1
oring the bouna post-9/11 wo
CSA proStart date
Duration
grant agreement No
t of democres. In fact, affairs durinanagement ement signet military c
nterest of Ewanted to
ment of the a clear civtructure as
y’s perceptiostabilizationDP missionate civilian ay in 1960, aty between s. This concstated tha
an capabilitio develop ag the efficie
ity operatiots that incoysis, recent response fress differenstarting to ents cannog the early
and command
d already in 19ccording to himon and educa
social impact owould be to bre
4 (2010):1,
ndaries of civiorld, ed. Jacin
IECEUoject: 653371: 01/05/2015n: 33 months
653371
15
ratic states,NATO has
ng the earlycapabilitiesed in 2001capabilities.
EU memberensure thatEU’s civil-
vilian crisisa separate
on towardsn of fragiles deployedand militaryarguing that
the civilianception can
at the EU’sies that cana ‘culture ofency of the
ons and theorporate alloperational
rom flexiblent types of
build localt simply be
y phases of
d structures 960, that this m ‘proper ation of the of the military eak down
l–military ta O’Hagan &
U
5 s
5
, s y s
. r t -s e
s e d y t
n n s n f e
e l l
e f l
e f
&
-
D1.3 Review planning fcapabilitiesspectrum oattempts tocomprehen
Managing
Since 1999an ability tapproach. attemptingcurrent insbetween thcivil- milita
2.2 Scop
This increparticularlymilitary intprovision othe govern
A growing guidelines,activities.24
purposes atimely peawork togeundertake In additionstrategic, oeach otherconflict ma
However, tin differentit has show 23 Eva SvoboHumanitarian24 For exampAdvantages fand Thomas http://futureuATHA, “Humwith armed foaction, (2008(Accessed 7
w: Civil- Milit
This project has re
for an opes to conduon its own o implemennsive appro
the interfa
9, the EU hto mix civiliUntil today to enhance
stitutional sehe Member ry structure
e of the i
eased engay for humanteraction wiof humanitanments that
number of, and best4 Civilian aand maximce buildingther on thehumanitaria
n, the activoperational r. For this reanagement.
the scope ot forms. In tiwn that in ti
oda, “The intern Policy Groupple: Thierry Tafor the United G. Weiss, (Thn.org/media/aanitarian policorces in comp8), http://www.October 2015
tary Synergie
eceived funding from
eration. Thuct out crihas had an
nt the ‘Janooach.
ace
has shown tan and mil
y, the EU’s e the EU’s aet- up for thStates and
es.
nteraction
agement bynitarians. Ththin peace rian assistadirect them
f policymakt practicesnd military
mizing the p interventioe same thean or monit
vities of humand tactica
eason, civil-
of the interfaimes of largimes of ‘ext
raction betweep Vol. 58 (201ardy,”Military-C
Nations?” in Phe Future Unitarchive1/reportcy making for plex political emhpcrresearch.
5)
es
the European Union
e gradual sis managn impact on
owitzian app
the ambitioitary crisis ambition haability to im
he civil- militd have refle
n
y the milithe key, ove
building coance and thm. 23
kers and scfor civil-m
specialistspotential forons. This is eatre of optoring activimanitarian al level, and-military co-
ace is contege humanitaternal’ crisis
en humanitaria4): 1-3, http://w
Civilian InteracPeacebuildingted Nations Dets/Peacebuildcivil‐military comergencies”, A.org/sites/defa
PU
n’s Horizon 2020 rese
disintegratgement open the EU’s proach’ to th
n to strengtmanageme
as materialiplement a ttary interfac
ected on con
tary in humrarching anoncerns thee political a
cholars are military relas share ther cooperatiobecause; i
perations. ities during and militar
d even, on s-ordination
ext specificarian disastes, the intern
an and military/www.refworldctions in Multidg Challenges fevelopment SingChallengesoordination (CATHA Themaault/files/public
earch and innovation
tion from erations alopolicy makhe civil- mil
then its roleent instrumeised as a ntruly comprece resulted nsiderations
manitarian nd widely doe tension band strategi
recognizingations in pe goals of aon, in ordeit is frequenFor instancthe first sta
ry operationsome occashas been re
c and it can ers, such asnational com
y actors: wher.org/pdfid/53ddimensional Pfor the UN Dev
System, 2015),s_FUNDS201
CIMIC) Establitic Brief Seriescations/ATHA%
n programme under g
NATO andong the w
king, which itary interfa
e as a uniquents as parumber of inehensive apfrom struggs rather tha
crises hasocumented etween thec objectives
g the urgenpeace buildavoiding tener to achievnt that militace, a civiliaage of post-ns may affesions, haveecognized a
take place s an earthqmmunity ha
re do we go frod0c2fb4.pdf (Aeace Operatiovelopment Sys, 27 -37. 5.pdf (Accessshing a policys: outlining ba%20Thematic%
CSA proStart date
Duration
grant agreement No
d EU’s strwhole civilia
nowadays ace, by dev
ue strategicrt of a comnstitutional pproach. Hogles and coan developin
s been cochallenge f
e neutral ans of military
nt need for ding and snsions andve more effary and civan organiza-conflict maect each o
e a negativeas a key iss
at differentquake in Haas the ability
rom here?”, PoAccessed 9 Ocons: What Co
ystem ed. Step
sed 11 Octobey framework foasic tenets of hc%20Brief%20
IECEUoject: 653371: 01/05/2015n: 33 months
653371
16
rengtheningan- militaryis showing
veloping the
c actor withmprehensive
innovationsowever, theompromisesng effective
ontroversial,facing civil–nd impartial forces and
standards,stabilization conflictingfective and
vilian actorsation mightanagement.other at thee impact onsue in post-
t levels anditi or Ebola,y to employ
olicy Brief, ctober 2015) mparative
phen Browne
er 2015); or working humanitarian
0CIMIC.pdf ,
U
5 s
6
g y g e
h e s e s e
, –l
d
, n g d s t .
e n -
d , y
-
D1.3 Review the civilianInternationinteraction enriched b‘integrationto civil- mibe connec
Figure 1. Im
Relations b
Coexisten
Communi
Collaboratcan include
Co-operatstructures
Coordinat
Integrationstrategies
Interaction
The aim interoperab
25 Catherine WEuropean Pehttp://www.epensive%20Ap26 Jean-PhilipJochen Rehr48. 27 Måns, HanOperations, (28 “Interaction
w: Civil- Milit
This project has re
n and militanal organisa between cby differentn’, it is impolitary relatioted to differ
mproving th
between civ
nce: existing
cation: sha
tion: workine joint plann
tion: differeand do not
tion: synchr
n: all relevand then w
n: any actio
of the intebility and sy Woollard, The
eacebuilding Lplo.org/assetspproach/EPLOppe Scherer, “rl and Galia Gl
nssen, Civil-M(Stockholm: Sn”, Vocabulary
tary Synergie
eceived funding from
ary assets ations have civilian and t terms. Wortant to undons are25. Arent activitie
e EU compr
vilian and m
g in the sam
aring inform
ng alongsidning, poolin
ent actors w(necessaril
ronizing effo
vant institutork jointly to
on between
eraction beynergy, whic
e EU and the CLiaison Office (s/files/2.%20AO_CSDN_Com“Cooperation alume, (Vienna
ilitary InteractSwedish Defeny.COM, acces
es
the European Union
across a screated vamilitary fun
When using derstand whAs the pictues, such as
rehensive a
military funct
me time and
ation.
de one anotg resources
work togethely) share ov
orts for agre
tions are bowards mee
parties.28
etween civch can be d
Comprehensiv(EPLO)), ctivities/Civil%mprehensiveAand Coordinat
a: The Federal
ion in the Euronce Researchssed 18 Augus
PU
n’s Horizon 2020 rese
pectrum in arious concenctions. Dis
terms, suhat is mean
ure below djoint planni
pproach
tions can be
d space.
her, but nots and evalu
er as enableverall object
eed upon sh
brought togeting them.
vilian and described as
ve Approach,
%20Society%2Approach_Disction.” In the Hl Ministry of De
opean Union: Agency, 2010
st 2015, http://
earch and innovation
a coordinaepts to desscourse desuch as ‘intent by these isplays26, dng and reso
e referred a
t necessariluating outco
ers, but aretives and st
hared purpo
gether to d
military funs:
European Pea
20Dialogue%2cussionPointsandbook on Cefence and Sp
Applying a Co0), 12 -14. /www.vocabul
n programme under g
ated or evecribe the scscribing civeroperabilityterms and w
different leveource sharin
s;27
ly towards somes togeth
e not part ofrategies.
oses.
develop com
nctions is
acebuilding Li
20Network/Pol.pdf (Accesse
CSDP Missionsports of the Re
omprehensive
ary.com/dictio
CSA proStart date
Duration
grant agreement No
en integratecope and dvil- military y’, ‘coordinwhat their iels of relating.
shared purpher.
f the same
mmon obje
often refe
iaison Office, (
licy%20Meetined 3 Septembs and Operatiepublic of Aus
e Approach to
onary/interacti
IECEUoject: 653371: 01/05/2015n: 33 months
653371
17
ed manner.depth of therelations isation’, andmplicationsionship can
poses. That
institutional
ectives and
rred to as
(The
ngs/Comprehber 2015) ions, ed. stria, 2015),
CSDP
on.
U
5 s
7
. e s d s n
t
l
d
s
-
D1.3 Review Interoperafrom otheroperate eff
Synergy: t
It would belevel of insituation. Itoutlined acoexistencas the exintegration
2.3 Civil-
The definitCrisis Manthe definitiobetween thpopulation the militarywith local a
CIMIC aimwithin the conditions crisis mana
29 Hanssen, C30 The develo2002 was oriand military aconference inof the concepof the EU Op10.1080/096631 In AJP-9, Nordination an NATO Command non-gove32 Council of CSDP/PSDCSeptember 2
w: Civil- Milit
This project has re
ability: the r systems, fectively tog
the increase
e wrong to steraction dt cannot, fo
above, in pce level migxperiences of civilian a
- Military
tion of EU’snagement Oon written bhe force and to contribuy perspectivauthorities a
ms to estabarea of opfor the ach
agement op
Civil-Military Inopment of the ented towards
actors in crisisn June 2003 wpt view: Nik Hyperational Hea62839.2011.5NATO Civil-mind co-operatiomander and cernmental orgthe European
C 750, 19.12.22015)
tary Synergie
eceived funding from
ability of syunits, or fo
gether.
ed effective
say that somepends onr example, particular, ght entail a from the Eand military
Cooperat
s CIMIC30 wOperations (by NATO31. d civil socieute to force ve that focuand civilians
blish and mperations, ihievement operations ai
nteraction in thEU CIMIC ha
s political, stras situations, inwas more orienynek, “EU cris
adquarters”, Eu556622 . ilitary Co-opern, in support oivil actors, inc
ganisations ann Union, ” Euro2014, http://dat
es
the European Union
ystems, unitorces and t
eness that re
me of the in what typebe assumecivilian relcompromis
Ebola crisisy actors can
ion (CIMI
was set in (2002) throuIt is a funct
ety. In a wayprotection
uses primas to reach th
maintain co-n order to of the missming at enh
he European Uas been markeategic and concluding the forntated at the osis managemeuropean Secu
ration (CIMIC)of the missionluding nationad agencies”.opean Union Cta.consilium.e
PU
n’s Horizon 2020 rese
ts, or forcesto use the
esults when
nteraction lee of relationed that coordations withse of the hus have sho
n support bo
C)
Civil-Militarugh EU Miltion and capy, CIMIC is and peacerily on forchat aim, as
-operation wcreate the
sion's purpohancing the
Union, 12 ed by two confnceptual levelsrmulation of thoperational anent after the Liurity, Vol. 20 (2
) Doctrine, (NA, between the
al population a
Concept for Eeuropa.eu/doc/
earch and innovation
s to provideservices s
n two or mo
evels are mns is possidination is ah military oumanitarianown, at timoth actors a
ry Cooperaitary Commpability thatabout “win
e and stabile protectiona part of a
with the cive best possose. It is ane effectivene
ferences. The s, and strived he guiding prinnd tactical leveisbon Treaty: c2011): 81- 102
ATO, 2003), th
and local autho
U-led Military /document/ST
n programme under g
e services to exchange
ore functions
ore effectivble or des
always effecor political
n principles.mes, the cochieve their
tion (CIMICmittee (EUMt aims to enning the heity. Therebyn, and on tcomplex m
vilian authosible moral,n important ess of those
EU CIMIC Coto delimit the fnciples. The seels. To read mcivil- military c2. Accessed 5
he CIMIC is de
orities, as well
Operations anT-17107-2014-
CSA proStart date
Duration
grant agreement No
to and acceed to enab
s work toge
ve than the osirable for tctive or wor
entities b.29 On the ooordinationr objectives
C) Concept MC) and wanhance the rearts and my, CIMIC dethe need toilitary opera
orities and p, material afeature of
e operations
onference heldfunctions betwecond EU CIM
more about thecoordination a5 August 2015
efined as “The
l as internatio
nd Missions” ,-INIT/en/pdf (A
IECEUoject: 653371: 01/05/2015n: 33 months
653371
18
ept servicesble them to
ether.
others. Thethe specificrthwhile. Asbeyond theother hand,
and even.
for EU-leds based onrelationshipinds” of theerives from
o cooperateation. 32
populationsand tacticalthe EU-led
s.
d in June ween civilian MIC developmentnd the future . doi:
e co-
nal, national
17107/14, Accessed 9
U
5 s
8
s o
e c s e ,
n
d n p e
m e
s l
d
t
-
D1.3 Review In practicecases: tdependentresources,cooperationon-govern
DependingCIMIC-oriefunctions. similar to tLiaison, Suthe Military
EU conceppublished (EUMS), implementand for tcapacities.separationand civiliacoordinatiocooperatio
2.4 Civil-
Since adopmilitary cristhat would
33 Marjan MaUniversity of August 201534 Agata MazSpołeczeństwhttp://www.ac(Accessed 1335 To learn mhttp://www.eunceptcimic_e36 Hynek, “EU
w: Civil- Milit
This project has re
e, CIMIC inthe crisis t on civilian informatio
on of the minmental org
g on the sented meas
Core functhose defineupport to thy Force. 34
pt for CIMIin 200835 which is
ing CIMIC the proced. This incl of mandatn actors inon in theaon, CIMIC ne
- Military
CMCO ‘ainvolved than seekEuropean
ption of the sis manageaddress th
alešič, Crisis M
Ljubljana, Fac)
zurkiewicz, ”NAwo Vol. 2 No. cademia.edu/93 September 2
more about theuroparl.europaen.pdf U crisis manag
tary Synergie
eceived funding from
nteraction umanageme
n institutionon and eveilitary force ganizations.
specific cosures may ctions of ted by NATOhe Civil En
C for EU-leby Europ
s responsat the polural roles ludes coores and long
n crisis situatre, ratherevertheless
Coordina
addresses thin the planniking to put ton Union, 7 N
EU CIMIC ement capae need for e
Management inculty of Social
ATO and EU a12 ( 2014): 129638917/NAT2015)
e concept, visita.eu/meetdocs
gement after t
es
the European Union
usually takeent operatins and then security with other
.33
ontext of eassume v
he EuropeO and inclunvironment
ed military pean Unionible for itical and sfor civilia
rdinating thg-term goalations. Althr than an s represents
tion (CMC
e need for efing and subsoo much empovember 200
Concept, Ebilities, andeffective co
n the EU: Inter Sciences) htt
approach towa25 -140, TO_and_EU_A
t: s/2009_2014/
the Lisbon Tre
PU
n’s Horizon 2020 rese
es place inion is par
e populationor/and theinternation
each operavarious diffeean CIMIC ude Civil-Miand Suppo
operations n Military planning
strategic len and mihe plannins, and the t
hough the overall st
s an importa
CO)
ffective coorsequent implephasis on de03).
EU has decld in this respoordination o
rnational Coortp://paperroom
ards civil-milita
Approach_Tow
/documents/se
eaty”
earch and innovation
two rtially n for re is al or
ation, erent
are litary
ort to
was Staff and
vels, litary g, commutransition oCIMIC contrategic coant operatio
rdination of thementation o
etailed structu
ared its ampect, there of actions o
rdination and m.ipsa.org/pap
ary relations in
wards_Civil-M
ede/dv/sede26
“Cithe
opethe
s
m
(C
n programme under g
nication, inf responsibcept is prim
oncept of onal compon
he action of aof the EU’s reures or proce
bition to dewas a need
of all relevan
Civil-Military Cpers/paper_26
n military oper
ilitary_Relation
60410euconce
●
vil-Military Ce co-ordinatio
all levels -components
erations and e EU, includin
and authointernation
nongoorganisation
support of the
mission along fu
CIMIC ConcManagemen
●
CSA proStart date
Duration
grant agreement No
nformation bilities betwemarily conccomplete nent of CM
all relevant Eresponse to cedures’ (Cou
evelop both d to developnt EU actor
Cooperation, (6078.pdf (Acce
rations”, Polity
ns_in_Military
eptcimic_/sede
● ●
Co-operation on and co-op- between mis of EU-led m
d civil actors eng the local porities, as we
onal, nationalgovernmentalns and agence achievememilitary
g with all otheunctions.”
cept for EU- lnt operations
● ●
IECEUoject: 653371: 01/05/2015n: 33 months
653371
19
exchange,een militarycerned withinstitutionalCO.36
EU actors crisis rather uncil of the
civilian andp a concepts under the
(Ljubliana: essed 25
yka i
y_Operations
e260410euco
(CIMIC) is peration at ilitary military external to population ell as l and l cies - in ent of the
er military
ed Crisis s, 2008)
U
5 s
9
, y h l
d t
e
-
D1.3 Review Council. 37
which refeCSDP, as
CMCO aimlinks betweEU with exa compreh
Whereas Ctactical levis located crisis manlevel of theobjective isvarious stplanning toexercises.
Until the ethe Lisbonmost signthe EU
Comprehefrom the about 200making theThese atteparts that n
1) Comprehave a cohhow to solv
(2) Compdifferent ac
(3) Managtheatre.
37 Radek KhoDefence in th38 Civil- civil r39 Svenja PosComprehensThe EU's Co2011), 57 – 640 Bjørn OlavDefence Res41 Johannse
w: Civil- Milit
This project has re
7 In 2003 thrs both to iwell as to c
ms to coordeen the comxternal actohensive app
CIMIC is mvel of the cri
at the politnagement ce Political as to integratages of cro crisis ma40
stablishmenn Treaty, tificant conc
ensive Apprinitial discu
05 when it e CMCO c
empts led toneeded to b
ehensive Aherent undeve it.
rehensive ctors in a co
gement of O
ol. “Civil- Militahe Mediterranerefers to coopst, Towards a
sive Crisis Manmprehensive A
65. v Knutsen, Thesearch Establisen, The EU's C
tary Synergie
eceived funding from
he EU formnternal EU
civil-civil38 co
dinate the mmmunity tooors. CMCO proach.39
ainly locatesis managetical- strateconcept (Cnd Securityte civilians risis managanagement,
nt of CMPDthe CMCO ceptual coo
oach to a cussions of
was adopconcept moo the identifbe included
Analysis: Aerstanding o
Planning:ommon plan
Operations
ary Coordinatiean. Human Seration and coWhole of Eur
nagement, (WApproach to C
e EU and the cshment, 2008Comprehensiv
es
the European Union
mulated its cprocesses
oordination
military, politols for crisisis the conc
ed at the opement operagic level, re
CMC) integry Committeeand the milgement, fro, including
D and the foconcept p
ordination
crisis. Durinthe conceted, some
ore specificfication of fiin CMCO.4
All actors inof the crisis
Aims at cnning effort
s: Aims at f
on in EU CrisiSecurity, (CIDOoordination berope Approach
Wisbaden: SpriCrisis Manage
challenges of ) 29.
ve Approach to
PU
n’s Horizon 2020 rese
concept for with respebetween th
tical and pos managemceptual corn
perational aations, CMCeflected in rated at the (PSC). Thlitary into thom strategtraining an
ormulation oprovided threference t
ng the perioept and un
attempts ac was madeive importan
41
nvolved mu at hand an
collecting a.
finding conc
is ManagemeOB), 121 - 13
etween differenh: Organizing nger VS, 2005
ement: Premis
f Civil-Military C
to Crisis Mana
earch and innovation
Table 1
r Crisis Manect to civil-mhe CFSP an
olicy instrument and the
nerstone of
and CO a
he he he ic
nd
of he to
od til at e. nt
st nd
all
cepts for eff
nt”, in 6th Inter1. nt civilian actothe European5), 201; Janina
ses, Ambitions
Coordination a
agement, 57 –
CMCO
(
n programme under g
1. Definition
nagement Cmilitary coornd Commiss
ments of a e security- p
EU efforts
fective civil-
rnational Sem
ors; i.e. police Union’s and M
a Johannsen, s, Limits, (Nom
at the strategic
65.
O is referred
a culture othe procedComprehepractise the prereqeffective Eand conceas implemensuring weffective cwhole raninstrumenthat the insubject toand thus dprocessesalso concexternal a
(Janina Joha