1.3 direct intervention
TRANSCRIPT
Direct Intervention
BRITISH INTERVENTION in THE MALAY STATES
From 1824 – 1873, the British in Malaya had tried to refrain from interfering in the affairs of the Malay states.
When the Straits Settlements were transferred from the control of the Indian government to the Colonial Office in 1867, the traits community thought that there would be intervention.
BRITISH INTERVENTION in THE MALAY STATES
In September 1873, Lord Kimberely , Secretary of the colonial office, inaugurated a policy of intervention in the affairs of the Maya states.
Factors for British Intervention
Rich in raw materials like tin
Industrial revolutions in Europe: raw materials and export markets
Factors for British Intervention Investment by English businessmen especially in tin
mining
Fear of other western powers intervention like Italy, German, France, etc
Factors for British Intervention
Opening of Suez canal in 1869
Situation of anarchy (lawlessness, social and political disorders)
Civil wars between rulers and noblemen over throne and territory
Factors for British Intervention Wars between Chinese secret societies
Pirate activities in Straits of Malacca
Conservative Party elected in 1874, change of foreign policy
The Resident System
THE RESIDENTAL SYSTEM IN MALAY STATE
During the last three decades of the nineteenth century, Britain became increasingly involved in the internal affair of the Malay State.
Perak, Selangor, Negeri Sembilan and Pahang, the sultans accepted British officials to help them rule.
THE RESIDENTAL SYSTEM IN MALAY STATE
These officials were called Residents, and the system of governing with assistance from a resident was know as the Residential System.
The Resident System British intervened with the excuse of protecting the
interests on British merchants
Chaos broke out with the Larut War (for the control over the tin mines)
PERAK 1874 The British intervened with excuse of
protecting the interest of British merchants
Chaos broke out with Larut War ( for control of the tin mines)
PERAK 1874 Involved the Chinese secret societies, Hai
San and Ghee Hin, and the civil war ( the struggle for the throne between Raja Abdullah and Raja Ismail
PERAK 1874
Chieftains such as Ngah Ibrahim and Raja Abdullah requested British’s help
The Pangkor Treaty was signed on 20th January 1874
J.W.W. Birch appointed the first resident
SELANGOR (1874) Civil war involving Raja Mahadi and Raja
Abdullah
Tengku Kudin and Yap Ah Loy supported Raja Abdullah
Selangor Sultan and Sayid Masyor supported Raja Mahadi
SELANGOR (1874) British intervention was not welcomed
In 1873, a British cargo boat was attacked by pirates. British took as an excuse to intervene
In August 1874, J.G. Davidson appointed as Resident and Frank Swettenham as his assistant.
PAHANG (1880s) Civil war between Wan Mutahir and Wan Ahmad for
the post of Chief Minister
The British were worried over Sultan Ahmad’s suggestion to give the trade concessions to Western powers
PAHANG (1880s) A British citizen was murdered – British took
as an excuse to interfere
Sultan Ahmad was forced to sign a treaty and receive a Resident (1888)
J.P. Rodger (Resident)
Sungai Ujung (1874) Stuggle for power in Sungai Linggi between
Dato’ Kelana Sayid Abdul Rahman and Dato’ Bandar Kulup Tunggal
Dato Kelana sought help from the English and was subsequently aknoeldge as chief of Sungai Ujong.
Sungai Ujung (1874) However, the appointment of Dato’ kelana
and British presence were opposed by Dato’ Bandar Kulup Tunggal
The British army. Led by w.A Pickering successfully defeated Dato’ Bandar Kulup Tunggal
Sungai Ujung (1874) Sungai Ujong accepted British Advisor, W.I
Tatham.
Analysis of British Intervention The colonization was spurred by internal
weaknesses such as unrest and civil war in the states concerned.
Analysis of British Intervention In other words there was no unity among
the inhabitants and this gave the British the chance and excuse to intervene by instilling an advisor (and later Resident)
Analysis of British Intervention Second the presence of important
economic resources such as tin ore and agricultural products in these states were also the reasons for intervention.
Analysis of British Intervention Third, there was strong competition among
the western powers for colonies to meet the economic needs of their country thus the need for intervention.
The Resident System
Duties of the Resident
1. To restore and maintain peace and order
2. To develop the resources of the state
3. To set up a regular system of revenue collection and administration
Problems faced by the Resident
No set of rules or instructions to guide them
Depended on their own initiative and resourcefulness
No authority to force Sultan to accept his advice
ignorance of local values and sensibilities
For Instance J.W.W. Birch in Perak was not liked by Sultan and
was opposed by the Perak chief until he was killed in Pasir Salak
Birch cancelled a loan the Sultan and granted to a trader.
Brought disgrace to the Sultan
Merits of the Resident System Stable government, peace and order
Development in transport and communication
Development in agriculture – rubber was introduced
Social changes – debt slavery abolished
Merits of the Resident System
Substantial economic growth.
Foreign investment – more effective exploitation of natural resources.
Greater revenue – higher standard of living.
Multi-cultural society – increase in Malaya’s population.
The Federated Malay States (FMS)
The Federated Malay States (FMS) Through the Federation Agreement (1896) the
“Federated Malay States” were formed
Federal Treaty, consisting of Selangor, Perak, Pahang and Negeri Sembilan
The Federated Malay States (FMS) Headed by a Resident-General based in Kuala
Lumpur
The role of the Resident-General was to advise on all aspects of government except on issues relating to Islam and Malay customs
The Federated Malay States (FMS) The Resident-General responsible to the
High Commissioner in Singapore
The first Resident-General was Frank Swettenham.
Federal Council Federal Council, 1895, acting like a Cabinet
was setup in Kuala Lumpur
The aim is to increase the power of the rulers and the residents in the states concerned.
Federal Council High Commisoner (President) Resident General 4 Sultans 4 Residents 4 unofficial members ( 3 Europeans and 1
Chinese)
Federal Council Obvious effect of the establishment of the
council was the gradual weakening of the power of the sultan and the State Executive Council
Federal Council This become very clear went when sultan
become only an ordinary member with no decision-making power.
Laws were signed and passed by the High Commissioner and not the Sultan.
Durbar To create a better relationship between the
rulers and the British officers, a Conference of Malay Rulers known as Durbar was introduced
Durbar Conference, 1897, meeting of the four Rulers, to discuss customary practices, Islam and Malay welfare
Reasons for setting up FMS
to address Pahang’s financial problems
to standardize the administration (lead to efficiency)
to ensure security
to check the Residents’ power
Merits of FMS
Efficient administration stable government
peace and order
heads of departments set up
System of justice, police and army were created
Merits of FMSEconomic progress
improved communications increase in population development of tin and rubber industries growth of towns increase in revenue
Non-federated Malay States
Non-federated Malay States Kelantan, Terengganu, Kedah and Perlis were
under the protection of Siam
Bangkok Treaty 1909, the Siamese agreed to hand over these states to the British
British advisors were appointed i.e. Kelantan-J.S. Mason 1910
Non-federated Malay States British power made it difficult for other Western
power to penetrate the Northern states
1919 – the four states were combined as the “Non-Federated Malay States”
Non-federated Malay States Having successfully expanded into the Unfederated
Malay States the British effectively controlled the whole of peninsula.
Decentralization of Power
Decentralization of Power Means that the important powers relating to
administration of finance and services, such as the railway, customs and postal services that were once under central control, would be distributed to the states concerned
Underlying factor for decentralization
1. dissatisfaction among the Sultans concerning their decision-making power; unlike the rulers in Non-Federated where the had greater power over their own state.
2. Decline of world economy in the 1920s.
Underlying factor for decentralization
3. The struggle of power between the Resident General and High Commissioner.
4. Only a few Malays were in the administration
Underlying factor for decentralization
3. Loss of power of the Sultans and State Councils
4. British intention to combine the FMS and NFMS
Conclude Distribution of power implemented by English was
based on economic and political motives.
British had intention of ruling whole of Malaya under one administrative entity that is Malayan Union.
Conclude However, this distribution of power was not
successful because the Japanese invaded Malaya in 1941.
Questions
List the struggle and sacrifices of our freedom fighters.