1292416516_coast_and_moors

Upload: improvingsupport

Post on 09-Apr-2018

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/8/2019 1292416516_Coast_and_Moors

    1/5

    Cas and MsVlnay Acn

    Talks about a potential merger rst emerged from an early partnership

    working agreement in 2005. It was apparent at this time that there was a lot

    of duplication in the sector, for example, two representatives normally in

    attendance at local strategic partnership meetings. As Scarborough CVS

    and Whitby VA were both small organisations, both wanted to address

    duplication in their workloads. Both parties also wanted a single and

    stronger voice for the voluntary sector in the area.

    Both organisations could see that

    nancial efciencies could be made

    through a merger. By cutting down

    on the strategic and back ofce

    functions, chief ofcers and nance

    departments, they could move more

    resources into the delivery of front

    line infrastructure services.

    The two organisations had

    also established good working

    relationships over a period of ten

    years. More recently they worked

    on a joint project (funded through

    Capacitybuilders ChangeUp grant)

    looking at possibilities of closer

    collaboration, initially with a further

    neighbouring CVS. Trustees were

    very positive about the idea and by

    the end of 2005, both organisationshad established partnership working

    arrangements and some joint project

    funding arrangements.

    LAI M MS - T CAS STUIS

    SCArborough, North YorkShire

    Coast and Moors Voluntary Action was formed in 2007 as the

    result of a merger between two former CVSs Scarborough

    istrict CVS and Whitby and istrict Voluntary Action (Whitby

    VA). Prior to the merger, both CVSs were operating in one

    district, the Borough of Scarborough on the orth Yorkshire

    Coast, a large area with a mix of urban and rural communities.Whitby VA covered the north, while Scarborough CVS covered

    the south of the district.

    The VCS was not together. There

    were two sets of memberships, but

    some organisations worked across

    the whole of the borough. We

    wanted one voice and a clear set of

    services for members.

    C xCTV OC, COST

    MOOS VOTy CTO

    Our joint working arrangements

    had been going ver well and

    we felt that merger would bring

    benets of economies of scale,

    efcienc savings of a single

    organisation and that we would be

    better able to represent the third

    sector. Our relationship was such

    that we felt it could work.

    C xCTV OC O

    CSSO WTy & STCTVOTy CTO, OW TS

    M, COST MOOS

    VOTy CTO

    The two

    organisations

    cooperate over

    the course of at

    least 10 ears, with

    partnership working

    intensifing in 2005

    Organisations

    undertake due

    diligence and

    consultations with

    staff and members;

    changes are made

    in the organisational

    structure and abusiness plan

    for the new

    organisation is

    prepared

    reparator scoping

    work

    ealy 2006

    Chief ofcers

    discuss possibilit of

    merger

    May 2006

    Organisations

    agree in principle

    to merge; shadow

    board established;

    new chief ofcer

    appointed shortl

    after

    Fay 2007

    traordinar

    general meetings

    at which membersvote in favour of

    merger

    1 Apl 2007

    Merger dateost-merger phase

  • 8/8/2019 1292416516_Coast_and_Moors

    2/5

    CoASt AN MoorS VouNtArY ACtioNPa 2LAI M MS - T CAS STUIS

    The decision to merge

    In early 2006, the two chief ofcers held talks to progress the merger

    proposal. They then held initial conversations with their respective trustees.

    In May 2006, the organisations agreed in principle to go ahead with merger.

    ne of the rst things the organisations did was to consult a lawyer with

    experience in mergers. Whitby VA was an incorporated body (limited by

    guarantee) and Scarborough was unincorporated and a registered charity,

    so they sought advice on appropriate legal form for the new body and

    how to merge given their different status. Securing legal advice at this

    stage gave trustees assurance that they were on the right path from a

    governance point of view. Very early on in the process the lawyer held a

    brieng for both sets of trustees individually to talk through the process

    and answer their questions.

    The legal form of the merger was decided at an early stage. Because Whitby

    VA was already incorporated, it was decided that it would in effect take

    over Scarborough CVS and then change its name and nature to reect the

    new organisation. This would be the most straightforward legal process, as

    there was no set up of a brand new company structure, and Scarborough

    CVSs assets and liabilities could be transferred easily. This option was

    chosen even though Whitby VA was a much smaller organisation, both

    nancially and in terms of staff capacity. Because this was agreed very early

    on, it then helped the organisations to map out the rest of the merger

    process.

    The merger process

    The chief executive of the new organisation was appointed at an early

    stage, so it was very clear who was leading on the process and responsible

    for its progress. This was an internal appointment, with the chief ofcer

    from Scarborough CVS taking the role, but both chief executives worked

    closely together to drive the process.

    The aim was to merge on 1 April 2007, which gave the organisations one

    year to complete the process. This timeframe was achieved.

    As a next step, the organisations looked at their stafng structure. The

    merger provided the opportunity to create a more efcient organisation

    and to put more resources into service delivery. A consultation on a new

    structure was carried out with staff in May 2006. A condential external

    mentor for staff was brought in something that the organisations felt was

    very important. Some 45 staff members were affected by the restructure,

    either directly or through their line management. Some redundancies

    were made and new teams established. The stafng issues were all dealt

    with by autumn 2006, so it was decided that the new structure would be

    implemented on 1 January 2007, prior to merger.

    The structure included a new enterprise team to focus on developing

    business, new ideas and maximising income generation. The previous chief

    ofcer of Whitby VA became the new enterprise manager. A membership

    t was like the small sh

    swallowing the big sh.

    ut this was just done as a

    legal device and everone

    understood that.

    C xCTV OC O

    CSSO WTy & STCT

    VOTy CTO, OW

    TS M, COST

    MOOS VOTy CTO

  • 8/8/2019 1292416516_Coast_and_Moors

    3/5

    CoASt AN MoorS VouNtArY ACtioN

    LAI M MS - T CAS STUIS

    and partnership team and corporate services team (providing back-ofce

    support) completed the structure, and the three team leaders joined the

    chief executive to form a senior management team. This marked a departure

    from the previous at structures, where the chief ofcers provided most of

    the line management support for all staff.

    nce the stafng issues had been dealt with, a clear timetable was set up

    outlining every key activity that needed to be done. They key things on the

    list included rebranding and IT redesign.

    The two organisations had completely separate IT systems in place.

    Consultants were brought in to design and deliver the system changes

    and provide IT support during the rst year of merger.

    The new branding was found to be challenging as both towns involved

    have very strong identities. The organisations decided not to incorporate

    the names of the towns into their new brand, but took the opportunity

    to establish a new name that reected the area but at the same time was

    neutral. The new name was established in discussions with both staff and

    trustees. esigners were invited to pitch for the new logo and branding.

    unding of 20,000 was secured from Capacitybuilders through orth

    Yorkshire and York Infrastructure Consortium, and was used to help towards

    legal fees, rebranding and IT redesign.

    A new business plan for April 2007 and beyond was drafted and agreed.

    It was a radical departure from the legacy organisations business plans

    and provided the new organisation with the opportunity to start afreshand focus on sustainability, maximizing efciency, generating income and

    becoming less reliant on grant income. ther key features of the business

    plan included:

    nsuring support and development services to the sector were

    effective and delivered across the whole Borough (two sites in Whitby

    and Scarborough)

    unning community buildings and contributing more to funding VCS

    development and support services from self-generated income

    Building and running a new 1.5million community building, the

    reen Lane centre in Whitby

    Laying out realistic project management fees, to generate income to

    cover organisational overheads

    Trustees were engaged and involved right through the merger process. Bi-

    monthly meetings were held with the two boards, which were presented

    with recommendation reports to enable them to make key decisions at

    every stage. In July 2006, a shadow board was established, comprised of

    four trustees from each existing board, which eventually became the board

    for the new organisation. The trustees not involved in the shadow board

    resigned on 31 March 2007.

    Communication with staff and frontline organisations took place throughout

    the process. orums were held with member organisations to ensure that

    they understood the process and a detailed member survey was conducted

    This funding was reall

    helpful. t demonstrated

    we had backing from

    Capacitbuilders and the

    Consortium and made it

    possible for us to do a

    thorough and professional

    job in these areas.

    C xCTV OC,

    COST MOOS VOTyCTO

    The planning process gave us

    the opportunit to re-assess

    the needs in the sector and to

    incorporate a gap analsis so

    that we could look at projects

    that could meet unmet needs

    in the communit. ts more

    pro-active - quite a radical

    rethink.

    C xCTV OC,

    COST MOOS VOTy

    CTO

    t was a good process a lot of [the trustees] had

    been around a long time, so

    were happ. The decided

    it between themselves, and

    identied four who wanted

    to invest a few more ears

    in taking it forward. So the

    shadow board focused on

    the future branding, new

    organisation etc. The rest

    dul resigned and the new

    trust started.

    TST, COST MOOS

    VOTy CTO

    Pa 3

  • 8/8/2019 1292416516_Coast_and_Moors

    4/5

    CoASt AN MoorS VouNtArY ACtioN

    LAI M MS - T CAS STUIS

    in September 2006. ewsletters were sent out and press coverage helped

    to familiarise local organisations with the new brand.

    In ebruary 2007, two months prior to the merger, extraordinary general

    meetings of the two predecessor organisations took place. These were

    to formally agree the transfer of assets from Scarborough CVS to Whitby

    VA, and for Whitby VA members to agree the changes. ew memoranda

    and articles were prepared for the new organisation, with assistance from

    lawyers.

    Success factors and benets

    Merger has led to some nancial benets for the new organisation. Although

    saving money was not a specic motivation, benets have been accrued in

    terms of efciency, diversifying activity and building in sustainability.

    Positive relationships have been built, particularly with the Borough Council

    and the local strategic partnership (LSP). Through establishing the new

    organisation, Coast and Moors Voluntary Action has improved its prole

    and established a new brand in the area. Through new work and service

    delivery it has built a good reputation with stakeholders. Coast and Moors

    is now regarded as a bigger player, and on the back of this has the ability

    to secure more funds.

    The merger has enabled the organisation to support more local voluntary

    organisations in Scarborough and Whitby, through increasing delivery ofgeneral support and reaching more groups. Coast and Moors also feels

    that its increased visibility means it has raised the sectors prole and can

    represent the sector better.

    The merger has enabled Coasts and Moors to do something new and

    different with CVS. They have built in sustainability, income generation

    and enterprise, something that they feel two smaller organisations would

    never have had the resources to do.

    A success of the process was the way in which the board was fully engaged

    all the way through. Trustees felt involved in the whole process, and as aresult are now very engaged in the new organisation. The board is now

    deliberately smaller (nine members compared with 12-15 in each of the

    previous organisations), regular monthly meeting continue to take place

    and attendance is exceptional. Trustees are very bought in to the new

    organisation and business plan.

    We can appreciate the

    benets its brought to the

    organisation e.g. one clear

    voice [for the sector]. rom

    a partnership perspective a

    good relationship has been

    maintained. We continue to

    do joint working and Coastand Moors is ver active in

    the S

    COMMTy TSS

    M, SCOO

    OO COC

    Our aim is to spend more

    and more through generating

    income. t hasnt been a

    downward trend we want

    to be on an upward trend. We

    want to do more.

    C xCTV OC,

    COST MOOS VOTy

    CTO

    ublic bodies now come to

    us and ask us to do things

    because weve shown we can

    deliver. We now have good

    track record

    C xCTV OC,COST MOOS VOTy

    CTO

    verone attends meetings,

    its ver rare that people

    dont show up. verone feels

    involved in process we still

    meet monthl. eople feelinvolved, know whats going

    on this is ver important

    TST, COST MOOS

    VOTy CTO

    Pa 4

    Challenges and pitfalls

    ne of the key challenges was the additional workload that the process

    placed on chief ofcers. Because a lot of the work was condential,particularly regarding stafng issues, they were not able to delegate much

    of this work to wider staff. They found it difcult to engage staff in some of

    the work because of the restructure that was taking place.

  • 8/8/2019 1292416516_Coast_and_Moors

    5/5

    CoASt AN MoorS VouNtArY ACtioN

    eSSoNS eArNe

    LAI M MS - T CAS STUIS

    Be very clear about why you are doing merger in the rst place and understand what you want to achieve

    before you start. Because theres so much work involved, you have to be sure. Ask yourself is there another

    way, such as collaboration, to consider rst?

    A good cross organisational relationship to begin with is benecial so theres no unfamiliarity and you know

    you can work together.

    Make sure you have full commitment from all parties at all levels trustees, management and staff. Its a non

    starter if there are any doubts.

    et support from members and stakeholders in the sector so you are working altogether with one voice.

    et good legal advice started very early and speak to lawyer to help resolve unanswered questions you may

    have and ensure you are on right path this saves a lot of uncertainty and gives trustees assurance.

    et good advice, good communications and good processes.

    Plan with appropriate timescales - things shouldnt be rushed.

    A very clear business plan means that staff are clear and understand the process. Staff and trustees need to be prepared to put in lots of extra hours!

    Merger can bring so many new opportunities, some unexpected be prepared to seize them.

    Use the full year before the merger to get things right in terms of governance, management and stafng.

    Strong leadership is really important having a chief ofcer leading the process who is capable, competent

    and business-like was seen to be hugely benecial and brought a fresh, different approach.

    Pa 5

    It took quite a long time to align staff contracts after the merger, and a small

    number of staff who remained in post felt upset about the redundancies

    that had been made. Such things had to be managed carefully after the

    merger.

    ccasionally legal issues crop up from time to time. or example, the old

    Scarborough CVS charity has not yet been dissolved. It doesnt have any

    assets or liabilities, but because it is such an old organisation (formed in

    1913), there were still some issues to be tied up after the merger, such as

    grant agreements.

    The organisation also has to address a perception by some voluntary

    organisations that since the merger, Coast and Moors has become a large,

    well nanced organisation and has lost its more traditional roots as a

    voluntary sector organisation. Its more professional, modern and outward

    looking brand contributes to this perception. Coast and Moors are workingcarefully to manage this perception, but it is proving a tricky balancing act

    between being visible and trying not to send out the wrong message.

    or further information about this case stud, please contact:

    Stephanie Sturrock, Chief ecutive, Coast and Moors Voluntar ction

    01723 362205 [email protected]

    mailto:stephanie.sturrock%40coastandmoors.org?subject=mailto:stephanie.sturrock%40coastandmoors.org?subject=