1.2.8 annex – egg harbor city page 1.2.8-1 · 1.2.8 annex – egg harbor city . page 1.2.8-1. ......

APPENDIX 1.2

WORKSHEET SUBMITTALS: MUNICIPAL ANNEXES

Multi�Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan – Atlantic County, New Jersey

Plan Update – February 2016

1.2.8 Annex – Egg Harbor City

anna_foley

Typewritten Text

.2.8-1

Ple

ase

fil

l in

th

e c

on

tact

de

tail

s fo

r th

e p

ers

on

fil

lin

g i

n t

his

pa

ge

:

Na

me

: J

od

i K

ah

n

Tit

le:

Ch

ief

Fin

an

cia

l O

ffic

er

Re

pre

sen

tin

g:

EH

CE

GG

HA

RB

OR

CIT

Y,

CIT

Y O

F

Em

ail

: jo

dik

@e

gg

ha

rbo

rcit

y.o

rg

Ph

on

e:

60

9-9

65

-46

83

Ag

reed

to

pa

rtic

ipa

te?

(Yes

/No

)

Em

erg

ency

Man

ager

Jere

my

Ad

ams

(Dep

uty

)se

rvic

e.e

ss@

ou

tlo

ok

.co

m6

09

�21

4�9

05

59

/11

/20

14

Yes

Flo

od

pla

in M

anag

er/

Flo

od

pla

in A

dm

inis

trat

or

Ed

war

d T

ou

sssa

int

ed

wa

rdt@

eg

gh

arb

orc

ity

.org

60

9�9

65

�16

16

9/1

1/2

01

4Y

es

Pu

bli

c W

ork

s D

irec

tor

/

Cit

y E

ng

inee

rR

aym

on

d M

ejia

sra

y.e

hcd

pw

@co

mca

st.n

et6

09

�96

5�4

71

99

/11

/20

14

Yes

Bu

ild

ing

Co

de

Off

icia

lE

dw

ard

To

uss

sain

te

dw

ard

t@e

gg

ha

rbo

rcit

y.o

rg6

09

�96

5�1

61

69

/11

/20

14

Yes

Fis

cal/

Bu

dg

et O

ffic

erJo

di

Kah

njo

dik

@e

gg

ha

rbo

rcit

y.o

rg6

09

�96

5�4

68

39

/10

/20

14

Yes

Man

ager

/Ad

min

istr

ato

rN

/A

Ele

cted

Off

icia

lsL

isa

Jiam

pet

ti (

May

or)

jia

ms2

08

@co

mca

st.n

et

60

9�9

65

�91

46

9/1

1/2

01

4Y

es

Oth

er 1

:

Uti

lity

Su

per

inte

nd

ent

Jerr

y G

leas

on

jerr

y.g

lea

son

.eh

c@v

eri

zon

.ne

t6

09

�96

5�0

14

09

/10

/20

14

Yes

Oth

er 2

: P

lan

Bd

Mem

ber

Ric

har

d C

olb

yR

ich

ard

.Co

lby

@st

ock

ton

.ed

u(6

09

) 9

65

�44

53

9/1

1/2

01

4Y

es

Oth

er 3

: E

ng

inee

rR

yan

McG

ow

anR

yan

.McG

ow

an@

rve.

com

60

9�6

45

�71

10

9/1

2/2

01

4Y

es

Yes

Lo

cal

Ju

risd

icti

on

Ro

le/P

osi

tio

nN

am

eE

ma

ilP

ho

ne

Da

te N

oti

fied

Ab

ou

t M

itig

ati

on

Pla

n

Dev

elo

pm

ent

Pro

cess

Lan

d U

se/

Co

mm

un

ity

Pla

nn

erG

eral

d M

uel

ler

(Pla

n B

d P

res)

ge

rha

rd@

jsa

en

gin

ee

rin

g.c

om

60

9�9

65

�11

95

9/1

1/2

01

4

anna_foley

Typewritten Text

02/05/15 UPDATE (AS PER JODI KAHN): no changes, except our Construction Official (Floodplain Manager) is now Edward Toussaint > Jodi Kahn, CMFO > Chief Financial Officer > Egg Harbor City > 500 London Avenue > Egg Harbor City, NJ 08215 > 609-965-4683 phone > 609-965-6698 fax > [email protected]

anna_foley

Typewritten Text

*

anna_foley

Typewritten Text

*

anna_foley

Typewritten Text

02/05/15 and 03/06/15 UPDATES (AS PER JODI KAHN): a.Conifer – Construction began late 2014 and projected to be complete in Spring 2015 b.Dollar General – Construction complete and store opened in Fall 2014 c.Renault – should be Bremen Avenue > Jodi Kahn, CMFO > Chief Financial Officer > Egg Harbor City > 500 London Avenue > Egg Harbor City, NJ 08215 > 609-965-4683 phone > 609-965-6698 fax > [email protected]

anna_foley

Typewritten Text

*

anna_foley

Typewritten Text

*

��ABBCBBDCE�F��C��

��

��AB��CDCE�

DCF��B

�D��A�C�EDF�

��F�

�D��

��

� ��ABC�DEE�F��A��

��

��A�B�A��AB��B��C��A��B��B�B��

��AB�C� !"#" $#% &'�

��

��

D��C�(A��)*�EE��A��+A�E�

��EE�E��E��C��B��,��A��A,�BE�-��BB�BE�A��E��A��AA��B��-�AE��B��B�-��

A��B��.��A-��B��A��A��(��AB��-��BE��B�/0/��B��--�A-��A1��A��A,��A��A-�AB2�-��+��B��A��

-��B�-��B��-��B�A��E�B��-AB��A��

-��B��AB��B��B��3��

��A��B��-��

��AB��4��A��AB�56�--A��A��F�B��7�,��--�A-��A��B��A��B��B��BE��B�

��A��AA�2-�AE��A��B��A��AB+��B��-��-�A.��AB��A��B��A��1-��B��AB��B��-��-�A.��+�

�

��D

F��B

��C��E

FC��E�

��

��C �D�C�

!C��A�CE��

�CB��EB��C

"##C��E$�BB

�C��E�

%F��

�� C��

#�&�E�C�

��E�CF�E�C

$�B��E�

%��B��C

#� C��C

��DDCE�B

'E

��C

!��C

A��C�

��

(��C�

(E�C�

!C�C��

)DCE�

��ABACD��

EFE�AFE��A��

0�

82829!! �

#�

6��AB�:0��

-��E��-��'�

-�E��'%$�

F�4��A�B��

D;<�

=�

=�

:B��-��B�9!!&�

��.��

��E��AB�

��E�>��A�-��AB��

��AB+�

��

��

��

A�B

C�

D�

*

�+�,-�./

0�+/�11�

��+.��

��C��+-

2��E�!C��

%

E��

FC

�

A��

��

��D�

*

.�+3�0/�

��B

��CB

��C��.-)

4

2��E�!C��

��E�5�E�E�

2��B

%

��

��

��

��C

��

��

��D�

*

.�+3�0/�

��B

��CB

��C��.-)

+-

2��E�!C��

��E�5�E�E�

2��B

%

��

��

��

�CC

��

��

�A

D��

�D�D

�C

�

��

��

�D�

.�++�4+�

4��3�0.

��C��43

2��E�!C��

��E�5�E�E�

2��B

6��E�E�C�E��

B��C�# 6'�

EG

G H

AR

BO

R C

ITY

____________

Atlantic County 4

��

��-��<��B�6��.��

��


DCF��B


��F�

�D��

��

�

��D

F��B

��C��E

FC��E�

��

��C �D�C�



"##C��E$�BB

�C��E�

%F��

�� C��

#�&�E�C�


$�B��E�

%��B��C

#� C��C

��DDCE�B

'E

��C

!��C

A��C�

��

(��C�

(E�C�

!C�C��

)DCE�

��

��B

��

��

��D

��

��

��

��

��

AD��

��

��

�DD

�C

��

�

!��

"�C

# $

�%�

�

AD

�D

�

*

4��,�1,

��C��.-)

1/

2��E�!C��

��E�5�E�E�

2��B�

%

��CB7��E

��EC��E�B ��E��

�CBC��C

&��

��C

C�

'��

��%

�

�A

D�

D

�(�

��

��

�

��

�

*

��C��.-)�-,�

��B��C0�#

8�B�C��E

2��E�!C��

��E�5�E�E�

2��B�

%

)��

� C

��#

� D

��%

�

�A

D�

D

�

��

(�

��

��D�

*

3��4�-.�

��C�

�-��,��

��C�++��B�

BCCF��D7��C�

��C�CE��E��E

��E�5�E�E�

2�B

%

*��

BC

�'

�D$

D

��

D��

��

�(�%

�� D

��

��

(�

"D

D

��

��

*

4��0��-

��D��C�CEB��C

8�B�C��E

��E�5�E�E�2�B

%

+��

B�

'� �

��

'�C

�D�

D

��

��

*

+-�,

��C��B��

�#�EE��C�

�,

��

� D

��

�-

D��D

#�-

D.

��

D�

D

��

*

3�0�1,�

0�+/�11

��C��.-)

,0

%

��

��

'D

��

'�

�D

��

�

*

��B

��C��.-)

�.

%

�E

��

�D

��

�BC

��

C��

%�

�

AD�

D

�

��

�

��

��/

� D

��$D

��%

�

�A

D�

D

�C��

��C

D� �C

��

��

EG

G H

AR

BO

R C

ITY

____________

Atlantic County 4

��

��-��<��B�6��.��

��


DCF��B


��F�

�D��

��

�

��D

F��B

��C��E

FC��E�

��

��C �D�C�



"##C��E$�BB

�C��E�

%F��

�� C��

#�&�E�C�


$�B��E�

%��B��C

#� C��C

��DDCE�B

'E

��C

!��C

A��C�

��

(��C�

(E�C�

!C�C��

)DCE�

��

��0

�C

C�

��

D�D

�C'�

D �

��

�

*

4�0��-

��D��C�CEB��C

8�B�C��E

��E��E

95�E�E�2�B

-

�!

��B

C�

'�D

$D

��

D�0

�D

�AD

�1�

%�

�

AD

�D

�

��

�

*

(��C�

��

"DC��CE��

:�C��EB��E

%

;C�B��C�C�C��,

�C��B

�&

��0

�D

�AD

�1�-

D�'C

�D

��

��

<

(��C�

��

"DC��CE��

:�C��EB��E

%

�)

��

C� �

��

�� D

��-

D�C

�D

�1��

��

�*

��

C� �

��

�� D

��-

D�C

�D

�1�

��

��

�D�

�+

��-

D�

��0

� �

D��

��C

��

�D�

-D

.�

��D�

D �

E,

��

$D

��2�

'D��

��

��'

C�D

�

��

��

�D

��3

�4D45

��

��C

��D

��

D�

��D

��6

�

�

�

EG

G H

AR

BO

R C

ITY

____________

Atlantic County 4

��

��-��<��B�6��.��

��


DCF��B


��F�

�D��

� �

�+��A�D�E�B��C�E��C��E��B��,��A��(��AB��

��B��B��A��A,�BE��

��,��B��B�

-��ABB��A��-��BE��B�?0@��B��--�A-��A1+��B��AD6��-��B��-��B�A��E�B��,A�)��B��B��

-�A.��B��A��A��B��A��

��.��B��-��-�A.��A��,��B�+�

�

F��##��C�B�EEC��CB��CB

=CB

�

!C��DCE��A�CE��

��DDCE�B

��

��

D�3

��

C��

0A

�D

D�3

��

#� $

�7C

#�D

�A

D�C

8��

�

��

D�D

�C'�

D �

��

��

��

�

�AD

�D

�

'��

� ��D��

0�

��A�B��2B��E�C�-�

�AB��

��D�-��-��-�A(��BB��D��

;��DBE�B��

D�E��BEAB�F�G��B��)�

DBE�B��

E��

0

A�

DD

�3��

C��

��C

8D��C

��3��

��

�D

��

��C

� �

�� C

�'��

� ��D��

D��

D�� C

��

��

A��

�(C

��

8��

��

�D�

0�

��A�B��2B��E�C�-�

�AB��

��D�-��-��-�A(��BB��D��



DBE�B��

��

��

D��

�C��

D

A�

DD

��#

� $

��

��

D��

�

��

A�C

8�

� �

��$

�9�

��

0�

��A�B��2B��E�C�-�

�AB��

��D�-��-��-�A(��BB��D��



DBE�B��

��

��

��

�CC

�'��

��:

��

��

��

C��

��

0�

��

!��

��

��D

1C

�3��

�0�

��AB��A��,��B�B��

&��

�D

��C

D��7��

D��C

��

��

D�

��

�;"

��<�

�''

��

�C

��

0�

��

�

)��

��D

��

8��

��

��#

� $

��

��

��$

�9�

��

�0�

��AB��A��,��B�B��

*��

0�

D�A

D�1�%

�

�A

D��

0�

�D��E�B��;

�B�E��B�

��#��

��AA��B�A��F�.A��B��

+��

"��

�/

�� D

�3��

�0�

��AB��A��,��B�B��2��B��.��

�,

��

�88�#

� $

�D='

D�

��D

�C��

��

�A

��

��D

D8� (

�C

� �

�

��1

��

��

0�

��AB��A��,��B�B��2��B��.��

��

��

�

�

EG

G H

AR

BO

R C

ITY

____________

Atlantic County 4

��

��-��<��B�6��.��

��


DCF��B


��F�

�D��

!� �

�,��6�B��B��,

��A��(��AB��A�A��E��A��A��A,�BE��A��B�B��A��

��A

BCBD�CB�E�F��F��5�B��BE��B��A��6��A��E��AB�E��B��B��7+��B��B��-��-��B�A��

�E�B��-AB��A��B��AB�A��A��AB��B��-�A.��B��A��A��B��A��

��.��B��-��-�A.��A��,��

��B�+�

�

6�E�E��CB��CB

=CB

�

!C��DCE��A�CE��

��DDCE�B

��

BC

��

�� 1��

D�D

�C'�

D

��

�C�7�"

��

��3

B�

�"

��0�

��A�B��2��)2��B�B��

H��E��B��B��A��-�A(��-��)��

��A�B��

E��

B�

'� �

��

'�C

�D�

D

��

�C>D

� �

��

��

A�

0�

��A�B��2��B�B��

��B�B��A��-�A(��B��BB��E��A��

��A��B�B��

��

:�

$C

�� 1

� C

�?D

�1�@

�=D

��8

C��

�'

D��8��

�'�

�'C�D

��

0�

��A�B��

:��A��B��.��-��B��BA��1��B��

��

A�D

��8D

D��8

C��

#�

D�5

��D

#D

�5�A

��C

��D

�D� �

��

D��

��D�

0�

�H��A��

��B��A.��1��BE��1-�B��

I��A��B��B��A��1-�B��BE�

,��2��,��B��F��BE�B�,�,��-��B�

!��

��'�

� ��

DD��8

C��

$C�

D��

1D

��C

��D

�D

�C'D

��C

8�

D

#��

D�D

�C'

�D

($

C�

D��

�0�

��

&��

��

��

D�

� $

�C�

A$

�AD

D��

��C

��A

� �C

��

C

��

0�

��A�B��

�

)��

��

��

D�

� $

�C�

A$

��'

D��

��

=��

C

��

�0�

��

*��

��

��

D�

� $

�C�

A$

�'��

��

D��

� �� 1��

C

��

�0�

��

+��

/� $$

C��

�'��

��D

='

D

��

�D��

�$�

9�

��B'

�C

D�

��D

��

0�

��A�B��

�A�

��

,��

,A��

��

�--��

�,

��

� D

�� A

� �C

�A��

�

'�C

A��

��3

D4A

4��

C�

�0

B5�

�C

B�

0�

��

1��

�

��

��

$D

��

��

�

EG

G H

AR

BO

R C

ITY

____________

Atlantic County 4

��

��-��<��B�6��.��

��


DCF��B


��F�

�D��

"� �

�3��DD�E��A��-��B��B��B��BE��

��E��A�,

��A��-A��-�

5�B��BE��--A�B��A��7��,��BE�A��B��-A��B��-�AE��4��.��B��B��A��A��B��.�B��,��

�A��A--A��AB+�D1��-��B��E��BE��.��A-��B��,��A��B��4��BE�-��B.��B��A��-��

��-�A.��B��,��B��4��A��B�A��BE��A��.��A-��B��B��EA��AB��

�B��

��6��A��I��B��5�+E+��

��BE��A��AA�-��B��

�B�E��B��+7+�E��(��AB3��-A��-��A��B��-A��B��-�AE��4��

.��B��AB��A��!�A�$+�J�B��E��A��A��-AB��A��E��E��A��A��B��-A��-��+�

�

�4)>C��?��E�

,)8��C��C��?��E�

-)(E7��E��A��CB��DB

F��C�@@@,)3@@@@@@@

��DDCE��E��BE��B��#��CE��CB��C�#CC��C�E��C�CB��E�C�CB��#��C��C�CE�#�CB��CE�B��C

��B��E�

EG

G H

AR

BO

R C

ITY

____________

Atlantic County 4

��

��-��<��B�6��.��

��


DCF��B


��F�

�D��

#� �

�

FC�#)ABBCBBDCE��#��-�A.��B��--�A1��

��A��A��(��ABK��-��A��.��-��B�

��4��

��E��AB��E��A��4��.��B��+�H��BE��A��A,�BE��-��-��B�/*/��B��A1��)�BE��

�A��--�A-��E��A��-��5L��;A��A��F�E�7��-AB��.��B�A��

��AB��B��-AB��

-�A.��B�6��AB��8#$�A��.��+��A��#(��AB��-��B��A��A��AB��BA��6��#<��B�

��-��;

��1��B�A��CE��<3+�

�

A�C�

!C��CC�#��

$�D��C�

8��C��C

&��

��BB�BE��B��E�E��A��-��

�0�

�

<��B��.��B��B��-��

�0�

�

��-��

0�

��

�A��B��A��-��

�0�

�

�A��B��E��B��-��

�0�

�

�

�

EG

G H

AR

BO

R C

ITY

____________

Atlantic County 4

02

/05

/15

AN

D 0

3/0

6/1

5 U

PD

AT

ES

(A

S P

ER

JO

DI K

AH

N):

no

ch

an

ge

s,EXCEPT THAT IN 2015 THE EGG HARBOR CITY PLANNING AND ZONING BOARDS

WERE MERGED INTO ONE LAND USE BOARD.

> Jodi Kahn, CMFO

> Chief Financial Officer

> Egg Harbor City

> 500 London Avenue

> Egg Harbor City, NJ 08215

> 609-965-4683 phone

> 609-965-6698 fax

> [email protected]

anna_foley

Typewritten Text

*

anna_foley

Text Box

* Updates on initiatives identified in current plan: (as per Jodi Kahn, 02/05/15) #1-currently participating in plan update #8-received $75,000 in funding from FEMA, working on obtaining remaining funding. Other actions have been reviewed and there are no changes at this time. > Jodi Kahn, CMFO; Chief Financial Officer, Egg Harbor City; 500 London Avenue, Egg Harbor City, NJ 08215 > 609-965-4683 phone > 609-965-6698 fax > [email protected]

Atlantic County Multi�Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Update

Plan Integration Worksheet

Atlantic County Multi�Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Worksheet #6 – Plan Integration

For a community to succeed in reducing risk in the long term, the information and recommendations of the hazard mitigation plan must be integrated into day�to�day local government operations. Throughout the planning process, partnerships are formed between departments and agencies, and sustained actions between these partners will increase the community’s resilience to disasters. “Plan integration” can be thought of as the process whereby each local government will incorporate the mitigation plan findings and projects into other planning mechanisms (governance structures that are used to manage local land use development and community decision making).

For this Plan Update, FEMA requires:

• a summary of each jurisdiction’s past progress in plan integration over the last planning cycle; and

• a description of plan integration activities that each jurisdiction expects to undertake over the course of the next planning cycle.

This worksheet has been set up, therefore, into two components with each portion focusing on one of the bullets above.

• Demonstration of Progress over the Last Planning Cycle – In the first component of this worksheet (shaded in blue), we have reiterated the targeted plan integration activities that were included in the last version of the plan (Section 9, beginning on Page 9�4) in a tabular form, and are asking each community to describe their respective accomplishments since the plan was adopted five years ago.

• Targeted Plan Integration Activities for the Next Planning Cycle – Similarly, in the second component of this worksheet (shaded in yellow), we have outlined a series of plan integration activities for the next five�year planning cycle. Please document to FEMA the manner in which your community will commit to integrate the hazard mitigation plan into your local government operations from this point forward.

Where integration activities are carried out by another jurisdiction through an intergovernmental agreement or by another layer of government (such as the county), please include a note on the bottom of this form and reference the section number on this form that the note is referring too.

Completed worksheets should be returned to via email to Don Weger at [email protected]. If you have questions or need help, please contact Anna Foley of URS at [email protected].

Name:_Jodi Kahn

Title:_Chief Financial Officer_____

Community:_City of Egg Harbor _

Email and Phone:[email protected] 609�965�4683 _______

Com

munity N

am

e___C

ity o

f E

gg H

arbo

r__

Atl

anti

c C

ou

nty

Mult

i�Ju

risd

icti

on

al

Ha

zard

Mit

iga

tion

Pla

n U

pd

ate

Pla

n I

nte

gra

tio

n W

ork

shee

t

P

ag

e 1

of

4

DE

MO

NS

TR

AT

ION

OF

PA

ST

PR

OG

RE

SS

OV

ER

TH

E L

AS

T P

LA

NN

ING

CY

CL

E

P

lease c

heck a

ll activitie

s t

hat

your

munic

ipalit

y h

as u

ndert

aken o

ver

the last five y

ears

.

1.

Check h

ere

if

you (

or

your

pre

decessor

on t

he C

PG

) is

sued a

lett

er

to e

ach o

f your

com

munity’s

depart

ment heads t

o

solic

it t

heir s

upport

and e

xplo

re o

pport

unitie

s for

inte

gra

ting h

azard

mitig

ation p

lannin

g o

bje

ctives into

their d

aily

activitie

s?

2.

A.

Check h

ere

if

you (

or

your

pre

decessor

on t

he C

PG

) w

ork

ed w

ith y

our

pla

nnin

g d

epart

ment to

educate

them

on t

he

Hazard

Mitig

ation P

lan a

nd e

ncoura

ge t

hat

on the n

ext

update

of

your

maste

r pla

n, g

enera

l or

com

pre

hensiv

e p

lan,

hazard

m

itig

ation for

natu

ral hazard

s is a

ddre

ssed. P

lease d

escribe y

our

coord

ination e

ffort

s in t

he s

pace b

elo

w.

B.

Check h

ere

if

your

munic

ipalit

y d

oes n

ot have a

maste

r, g

enera

l, o

r com

pre

hensiv

e p

lan.

C.

Check h

ere

if

your

maste

r, g

enera

l or

com

pre

hensiv

e w

as u

pdate

d s

ince 2

009.

D.

If y

ou c

hecked b

ox 2

C,

ple

ase c

heck h

ere

if

natu

ral hazard

ris

k/m

itig

ation w

as incorp

ora

ted into

the u

pdate

d d

ocum

ent,

and d

escribe h

ow

in t

he s

pace b

elo

w.

E.

If y

ou c

hecked b

ox 2

C,

ple

ase c

heck h

ere

if

a s

pecific

hazard

mitig

ation e

lem

ent

was a

dded t

o t

he d

ocum

ent, a

nd

describe in the s

pace b

elo

w.

3.

Check h

ere

if

you (

or

your

pre

decessor

on t

he C

PG

) coord

inate

d w

ith y

our

build

ing d

epart

ment to

ensure

that th

ey h

ave

adopte

d a

nd a

re e

nfo

rcin

g t

he m

inim

um

sta

ndard

s e

sta

blis

hed in t

he c

urr

ent

Sta

te4a

dopte

d I

BC

. P

lease d

escribe y

our

coord

ination e

ffort

s in the s

pace b

elo

w.

4.

A.

If y

our

com

munity p

art

icip

ate

s in t

he N

FIP

and w

as o

nly

enfo

rcin

g m

inim

um

req

uirem

ents

at th

e t

ime o

f th

e f

irst pla

n’s

adoption,

check h

ere

if

you (

or

your

pre

decessor

on t

he C

PG

) coord

inate

d w

ith y

our

Flo

odpla

in A

dm

inis

trato

r to

dete

rmin

e

if e

nfo

rcem

ent beyond F

EM

A m

inim

um

req

uirem

ents

would

be p

rudent fo

r your

com

munity. P

lease d

escribe y

our

coord

ination e

ffort

s in the s

pace b

elo

w.

Com

munity N

am

e___C

ity o

f E

gg H

arbo

r__

Atl

anti

c C

ou

nty

Mult

i�Ju

risd

icti

on

al

Ha

zard

Mit

iga

tion

Pla

n U

pd

ate

Pla

n I

nte

gra

tio

n W

ork

shee

t

P

ag

e 2

of

4

B.

Check h

ere

if

your

com

munity w

as a

lready e

nfo

rcin

g r

eg

ula

tions b

eyond F

EM

A m

inim

um

req

uirem

ents

.

C.

Briefly e

xpla

in h

ere

what

is c

urr

ently b

ein

g e

nfo

rced b

eyond F

EM

A m

inim

um

req

uirem

ents

. D

. C

heck h

ere

if

your

com

munity h

as m

ain

tain

ed its

part

icip

ation in the N

FIP

’s C

om

munity R

ating

Syste

m (

CR

S).

E.

Check h

ere

if

your

com

munity h

as join

ed t

he C

RS

sin

ce 2

009.

F.

Check h

ere

if

your

com

munity h

as d

ropped o

ut

of th

e C

RS

sin

ce 2

009.

5.

A.

Check h

ere

if

your

com

munity h

as a

local zonin

g o

rdin

ance.

B.

Check h

ere

if

you (

or

your

pre

decessor

on t

he C

PG

) w

ork

ed w

ith y

our

local zonin

g b

oard

to e

ducate

them

on t

he

Hazard

Mitig

ation P

lan a

nd e

ncoura

ge c

onsid

era

tion o

f lo

w o

ccupancy,

low

4density z

onin

g in h

azard

are

as, w

hen

pra

cticable

. P

lease d

escribe y

our

coord

ination e

ffort

s in t

he s

pace b

elo

w.

6.

A.

Check h

ere

if

any job d

escriptions w

ere

revis

ed t

o inclu

de m

itig

ation4r

ela

ted d

uties to furt

her

institu

tionaliz

e m

itig

ation.

B.

If s

o, describe.

7.

A.

Check h

ere

if

capital or

opera

ting

budg

ets

were

revis

ed t

o inclu

de a

lin

e ite

m for

mitig

ation p

roje

ct fu

ndin

g.

B

. C

heck h

ere

if

capital or

opera

ting b

udg

ets

already inclu

ded t

his

when t

he p

lan w

as f

irst

adopte

d.

8.

A.

Check h

ere

if

your

Depart

ment of

Public

Work

s h

as a

dopte

d m

ore

rig

oro

us p

rocedure

s f

or

inspecting a

nd c

leanin

g

debris fro

m s

tream

s a

nd d

itches (

i.e., m

ore

fre

quently).

B.

If s

o, describe.

9.

A.

Check h

ere

if

your

Pla

nnin

g D

epart

ment has a

dded h

azard

vuln

era

bili

ty t

o s

ubdiv

isio

n a

nd s

ite p

lan r

evie

w c

rite

ria.

B.

If s

o, describe.

10. (N

OT

E: A

response to #

10 is o

nly

required for

AC

OE

P;

all

munic

ipalit

ies,

ple

ase leave b

lank)

Check h

ere

if

AC

OE

P

soug

ht to

identify

a c

om

munity c

onserv

ation s

ocie

ty o

r oth

er

inte

reste

d v

olu

nta

ry o

rganiz

ation t

o p

erf

orm

invento

ries o

f his

toric s

ites in h

azard

are

as t

hat m

ight re

quire s

pecia

l tr

eatm

ent to

pro

tect th

em

fro

m s

pecific

hazard

s.

B.

If s

o, describe.

11. C

heck h

ere

if

your

com

munity h

as r

eached o

ut to

part

ner

gro

ups in the c

om

munity (

i.e., n

onpro

fit

org

aniz

ations,

busin

esses,

etc

.) t

o identify

those w

ho m

ay b

e w

illin

g to d

onate

goods o

r serv

ices a

nd c

reate

a d

ata

base o

f conta

ct

info

rmation a

nd indic

ate

d g

oods/s

erv

ices.

B.

If s

o, describe.

Com

munity N

am

e___C

ity o

f E

gg H

arbo

r__

Atl

anti

c C

ou

nty

Mult

i�Ju

risd

icti

on

al

Ha

zard

Mit

iga

tion

Pla

n U

pd

ate

Pla

n I

nte

gra

tio

n W

ork

shee

t

P

ag

e 3

of

4

12. C

heck h

ere

if

your

com

munity h

as a

ctively

soug

ht citiz

en v

olu

nte

ers

to h

elp

im

ple

ment m

itig

ation p

rog

ram

s a

nd a

ctivitie

s.

B.

If s

o, ple

ase d

escribe.

13. A

. (N

OT

E: A

response to #

13A

is o

nly

required for

AC

OE

P;

all

munic

ipalit

ies,

ple

ase leave b

lank)

C

heck h

ere

if

a lis

t w

as c

om

pile

d o

f sta

te a

gencie

s t

hat

can lend their t

ime,

expert

ise a

nd f

unds t

o t

he im

ple

menta

tion o

f hazard

mitig

ation

pro

jects

.

B.

(NO

TE

: A

response to #

13A

is o

nly

required for

AC

OE

P;

all

munic

ipalit

ies,

ple

ase leave b

lank)

C

heck h

ere

if

assis

tance w

as p

rovid

ed t

o p

art

icip

ating jurisdic

tions in r

eachin

g o

ut to

sta

te a

gencie

s f

or

support

.

C.

If A

or

B w

as c

hecked,

ple

ase d

escribe.

14. A

. C

heck h

ere

if

your

com

munity h

as r

eached o

ut to

colle

ges a

nd u

niv

ers

itie

s f

or

technic

al assis

tance w

ith h

azard

m

itig

ation a

ctivitie

s.

B.

If s

o, ple

ase d

escribe.

15. A

. C

heck h

ere

if

your

com

munity h

as m

et at le

ast once w

ith y

our

local lib

rary

sta

ff m

em

bers

to d

iscuss h

e m

itig

ation p

lan

so t

hey a

re w

ell4

vers

ed in its

purp

ose a

nd u

nders

tand w

here

to d

irect

inte

reste

d p

art

ies f

or

more

info

rmation, t

o p

rovid

e

feedback, or

to b

ecom

e involv

ed.

B.

If s

o, ple

ase d

escribe.

Com

munity N

am

e___C

ity o

f E

gg H

arbo

r__

Atl

anti

c C

ou

nty

Mult

i�Ju

risd

icti

on

al

Ha

zard

Mit

iga

tion

Pla

n U

pd

ate

Pla

n I

nte

gra

tio

n W

ork

shee

t

P

ag

e 4

of

4

TA

RG

ET

ED

PL

AN

IN

TE

GR

AT

ION

AC

TIV

ITIE

S F

OR

TH

E N

EX

T P

LA

NN

ING

CY

CL

E

Ple

ase c

heck a

ll activitie

s t

hat

your

munic

ipalit

y is c

om

mitting to u

ndert

ake o

ver

the n

ext five y

ears

.

1.

CP

G m

em

ber

will

issue a

lett

er

to e

ach d

epart

ment

head t

o s

olic

it their s

upport

and e

xplo

re o

pport

unitie

s f

or

furt

her

inte

gra

tion o

f hazard

mitig

ation into

the d

aily

activitie

s o

f th

e c

om

munity a

s a

whole

. X

2.

A.

Incorp

ora

te h

azard

mitig

ation f

or

natu

ral hazard

s in t

he n

ext

update

of your

maste

r, g

enera

l or

com

pre

hensiv

e p

lan.

X

B.

Add a

specific

hazard

mitig

ation e

lem

ent to

the n

ext

update

of

your

maste

r, g

enera

l or

com

pre

hensiv

e p

lan.

3.

Adopt

and e

nfo

rce the m

inim

um

build

ing s

tandard

s e

sta

blis

hed in t

he c

urr

ent

Sta

te4a

dopte

d I

BC

(N

J e

ditio

n).

X

4.

A.

Main

tain

com

munity p

art

icip

ation in F

EM

A’s

National F

lood I

nsura

nce P

rogra

m.

X

B.

Enfo

rce c

odes a

nd s

tandard

s b

eyond F

EM

A m

inim

um

req

uirem

ents

.

C.

Join

(or

continue t

o m

ain

tain

part

icip

ation in)

the N

FIP

’s C

om

munity R

ating

Syste

m.

5.

Ste

er

gro

wth

and d

evelo

pm

ent aw

ay f

rom

hig

h r

isk locations b

y u

sin

g t

he r

isk a

ssessm

ent fr

om

the h

azard

mitig

ation p

lan

as a

tool to

monitor

futu

re u

pdate

s o

f com

munity land u

se p

lans,

zonin

g a

nd s

ubdiv

isio

n c

odes a

nd the d

evelo

pm

ent

revie

w p

rocess.

6.

Mod

ify w

ork

pla

ns,

polic

ies o

r pro

cedure

s t

o inclu

de h

azard

mitig

ation c

oncepts

/activitie

s.

7.

Revis

e job d

escriptions to inclu

de m

itig

ation4r

ela

ted d

uties to f

urt

her

institu

tionaliz

e m

itig

ation.

8.

Revis

e c

apital or

opera

ting b

udg

ets

to inclu

de a

lin

e ite

m f

or

mitig

ation p

roje

ct fu

ndin

g.

9.

Issue d

irectives t

o r

eq

uire d

epart

ments

/ag

encie

s in t

he c

om

munity t

o c

arr

y o

ut

cert

ain

hazard

mitig

ation a

ctivitie

s.

10. R

eq

uire the D

epart

ment of

Public

Work

s t

o inspect

and c

lean d

ebris fro

m s

tream

s a

nd d

itches m

ore

fre

quently.

X

11. A

dd h

azard

vuln

era

bili

ty t

o s

ubdiv

isio

n a

nd s

ite p

lan r

evie

w c

rite

ria.

12. P

erf

orm

invento

ries o

f his

toric s

ites in h

azard

are

as in y

our

com

munity t

o identify

where

specia

l tr

eatm

ent m

ay b

e n

eeded

to p

rote

ct th

em

fro

m s

pecific

natu

ral hazard

s.

13. R

each o

ut to

sta

te a

gencie

s f

or

assis

tance w

ith n

atu

ral hazard

mitig

ation a

ctivitie

s.

X

14. R

each o

ut to

colle

ges a

nd u

niv

ers

itie

s f

or

technic

al assis

tance w

ith n

atu

ral hazard

mitig

ation a

ctivitie

s.

15. A

dopt

(or

continue to e

nfo

rce)

a local sto

rmw

ate

r m

anag

em

ent

pla

n/o

rdin

ance.

X

16. P

rote

ct

life a

nd p

ropert

y in h

igh h

azard

are

as b

y lim

itin

g d

ensitie

s o

f new

develo

pm

ent.

17. In

cre

ase r

esili

ence b

y lim

itin

g the e

xte

nsio

n o

f public

infr

astr

uctu

re in h

igh h

azard

are

as.

18. R

educe t

he v

uln

era

bili

ty o

f fu

ture

develo

pm

ent in

hig

h h

azard

are

as b

y r

evie

win

g d

evelo

pm

ent re

gula

tions,

and m

odifyin

g

where

needed.

19. U

se t

he r

isk a

ssessm

ent to

info

rm futu

re u

pdate

s o

f th

e c

om

munity e

merg

ency o

pera

tions p

lan,

evacuation p

lan, and/o

r post

dis

aste

r re

covery

pla

n.

X

20. Im

ple

ment hazard

mitig

ation a

ctivitie

s t

hro

ug

h e

xis

ting p

lans a

nd p

olic

ies.

21. S

ponsor

train

ing o

n b

est pra

ctices f

or

hazard

mitig

ation f

or

local g

overn

ment

sta

ff. (N

ote

: this

may b

e a

ccom

plis

hed w

ith

oth

er

local g

overn

ments

.)

Your plan name Atlantic County Multi-jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan

Your community name City of Egg Harbor

Community action number EHC-1

Assessing the Risk

Hazard(s) addressed All

Risk finding Did not participate in last County plan

Describing the Action

Action category Planning & Regulatory Solutions

Action type Participation in County Plan Update

Action description Participation in County Plan Update

Existing, future &/or NA Existing

Evaluating the Action

Losses avoided

(i.e., benefits)

Avoid not being able to apply for mitigation funding, allow City to identify hazards

and steps to mitigate them

Cost estimate $2,000 mostly through in-kind services

Cost effectiveness

(i.e., benefit/cost)

Benefits outweigh minor costs. Is a low cost action that can be easily implemented.

Technical Technically feasible. City recently completed plan with 3 other munis which wil be

incorportated into this plan.

Political No apparent political issues.

Legal Action is legal and similar work recently completed for 4 muni plan.

Environmental No environmental impacts.

Social Does not adversely affect any social group.

Administrative capability Administrative tasks to be mostly handled by City's Chief Financial Officer.

Local champion City Council and Land Use Board.

Other community objectives Ability to apply for grants.

Implementing the Action

Priority High

Local planning mechanism N/A

Responsible party CFO, City Council, JAT Team

Potential funding sources In-Kind Services

Time line 1 Year

Reporting on Progress

Action progress status Currently participating in plan update, all work submitted to County/Contractor in a

timely manner

Action Worksheet

FEMA Region II Mitigation Planning – Draft Handout 06 as of 02/22/13




Assessing the Risk

Hazard(s) addressed Flood

Risk finding City Dam needs replacement of retianing wall, spillway, and overlapping protection


Action category Structure & Infrastructure Projects

Action type Flood Control

Action description Retrofit dam to prevent to prevent overtopping during a hazard event; retrofit

retaining wall and spillway

Existing, future &/or NA Future


Losses avoided

(i.e., benefits)

Avoid collapse of dam, destruction of lake and property surrounding lake including

campground

Cost estimate $1,220,000

Cost effectiveness


Benefits outweigh costs as need to protect area.

Technical Technically feasible. Would require contracted engineering services.


Legal No apparent legal issues.

Environmental Engineers/pinelands would be consulted to determine any environmental impacts.


Administrative capability Administrative tasks to be handled by City's Chief Financial Officer and City Engineer.

Local champion Mayor & Council, Parks & Playgrounds Committee

Other community objectives N/A


Priority High


Responsible party City Engineer

Potential funding sources HMGP

Time line 1 Year


Action progress status Have applied for LOI after Hurricane Sandy for HMGP funding

Action Worksheet





Assessing the Risk

Hazard(s) addressed Flood

Risk finding Allow stormwater to flow adequately and limit damage to adjacent properties


Action category Natural Systems Protection

Action type Drainage improvement

Action description Increase carrying capacity of creeks



Losses avoided

(i.e., benefits)

Avoid damage to properties adjacent to creeks

Cost estimate Medium - between $10,000-100,000

Cost effectiveness


Benefits outweigh costs as need to protect area.

Technical Technically feasible. Would require contracted engineering services.






Local champion Mayor & Council, Eyren Hafen Land Preserve Inc.



Priority Medium


Responsible party City Engineer

Potential funding sources HMGP, NJDEP, County, City Budget

Time line 1 Year


Action progress status No action taken at this time

Action Worksheet





Assessing the Risk

Hazard(s) addressed Flood, Severe Storm, Severe Winter Storm

Risk finding Trees may topple or adversely affect structures, infrastructure, or roadways during a

storm.


Action category Education and Awareness Programs

Action type Education and public outreach

Action description Identify and prioritize with residents/business owners to trim trees and develop City-

wide maintenance program. Acquire equipment and obtain training to allow City

personnel to remove fallen tree.



Losses avoided

(i.e., benefits)

Avoid damage to structures, infrastructure, and roadways from toppled trees.

Cost estimate Medium - between $10,000-100,000

Cost effectiveness


Benefits outweigh costs as need to protect structures, infrastructure, and roads.

Technical Technically feasible. May require contracted engineering services.

Political Political issues are that some groups want street trees and some groups want trees

removed.

Legal Legal issues may arise as to who owns a particular tree depending on location.




Local champion Mayor & Council, SustainableEHC (City's Green Team), Shade Tree Committee



Priority Medium


Responsible party Public Works Department/Utility Committee, City Engineer

Potential funding sources NJDEP, City Budget

Time line On-going


Action progress status Shade Tree Committee member maintains inventory of City trees, reviews after major

storms

Action Worksheet





Assessing the Risk

Hazard(s) addressed Drought, Earthquake

Risk finding Adequate drinking water may not be available, flooding may occur from broken

mains


Action category Structure and Infrastructure Projects

Action type Upgrade

Action description Assess system and identify locations to upgrade City water & sewer mains



Losses avoided

(i.e., benefits)

Avoid damage to structures, infrastructure, and roadways from broken mains, ensure

residents always have access to safe drinking water

Cost estimate High - Several million dollars

Cost effectiveness


Benefits outweigh costs as need to protect structures, infrastructure, and roads.

Technical Technically feasible. Will require contracted engineering services.

Political Political issues are that some groups may feel City should privatize water system.





Local champion Mayor & Council, Utility Committee

Other community objectives Supports City capital plan


Priority High


Responsible party Utility Committee, City Engineer

Potential funding sources Various Grants, USDA Rural Development, City Budget

Time line Long term


Action progress status Utility Committee has discussed possibly applying for grant funds to replace sections

of main in South Egg Harbor

Action Worksheet



Your community name Egg Harbor City


Assessing the Risk

Hazard(s) addressed Flood, Severe Storm, Severe Winter Storm, Wildfire

Risk finding Protect structures from damage



Action type Retrofit (Elevation, Flood-proofing), Acquisition/Relocation

Action description Prioritize and investigate options to mitigate vulnerable structures

Existing, future &/or NA Existing (identify)/Future (specific projeect implementation)


Losses avoided

(i.e., benefits)

Avoid damage to structures.

Cost estimate High - Over $100,000

Cost effectiveness


Benefits outweigh costs as need to protect structures.

Technical Technically feasible. Would prevent damage to vulnerable properties.






Local champion Mayor & Council

Other community objectives Could lead to lower flood insurance premiums


Priority High

Local planning mechanism Building Subcode

Responsible party Mayor & Council, Land Use Board

Potential funding sources FEMA Mitigation grant, City budget, homeowner, County housing grants

Time line Ongoing (identify) & Long term (specific projects)


Action progress status Two properties have been identified as vulnerable: 1.Oken Street and perimeter

around lake and 2.Green Bank, Creek, and Lower Bank Roads

Action Worksheet





Assessing the Risk

Hazard(s) addressed All hazards identified in HMP

Risk finding Pubblic understanding of hazard mitigation and its benefits are limited


Action category Education and Awareness Programs

Action type Public Awareness and Education Program

Action description Developand implement and enhanced all hazard, public outreach, education, and

mitigation information plan. Prepare and distribute surveys, provide information in

mailings, use various media to distribute information, and develop/maintain page on

City website dedicated to hazard mitigation.



Losses avoided

(i.e., benefits)

Public awareness willbuild support formitigation, encourage homeowners to create a

demand for betterconstruciton practices and reduce avoidable injuries and

emergencies

Cost estimate Low - $1,000

Cost effectiveness


Benefits outweigh minor costs. This is a low cost action that can be easily

implemented.

Technical Technically feasible. Building public awareness has proven to reduce risk.


Legal Action is legal and educational efforts have been previously used for messages on

public safety and welfare.

Environmental No adverse environmental impacts.


Administrative capability Administrative costs considered low, City has capability.

Local champion County OEM, Schools

Other community objectives Could lead to lower flood insurance premiums


Priority High


Responsible party City Finance Office, City OEM, City Clerk

Potential funding sources City budget

Time line 1 year


Action progress status Have posted information on City website, local cable channel

Action Worksheet





Assessing the Risk

Hazard(s) addressed All hazards identified in HMP

Risk finding Critical facilities may not be able to operate during a hazard



Action type Stand-Alone Generator for Critical Facility

Action description Acquire and install a new generator at City Hall



Losses avoided

(i.e., benefits)

Avoid shut down of critical services - police & oem during a hazard

Cost estimate $371,000

Cost effectiveness


Benefits outweigh costs.

Technical Technically feasible. Engineers have drafted estimate.



Environmental Pinelands/engineers would be consulted to determine any adverse environmental

impacts.


Administrative capability City has capability to carry out, would need to contract engineering services.

Local champion County OEM, Schools



Priority High

Local planning mechanism Building Code

Responsible party City Finance Office, City Engineer

Potential funding sources HMGP, other grants

Time line 1 year


Action progress status Have applied for and received $75,000 in HMGP funding, looking for other funding

sources for remaining cost

Action Worksheet




Community action number 9

Assessing the Risk


Risk finding Local codes and ordinances can be evaluated and updated to improve upon or

expand the mitigation approach to address natural disaster mitigation techniques.


Action category Local planning and regulations

Action type Adopt and enforce building codes

Action description Code update: Review existing local codes and ordinances against the identified

hazards to determine whether there need to be any amendments to address

identified hazards and, where a need is identified, modify/amend the

codes/ordinances as applicable. (prevention)

Existing, future &/or NA Existing and future


Losses avoided

(i.e., benefits)

Unquantifiable, but expected to be relatively high as compared to costs as losses are

avoided over time

Cost estimate $1,000 for legal/printing

Cost effectiveness


This action is likely to be cost-effective, with losses avoided over time anticipated to

be greater than the costs of plan revisions.

Technical This action is generally deemed to be a technically feasible component of a

community mitigation strategy


Legal No anticipated legal impacts; local government has appropriate authorities

Environmental No anticipated positive or negative environmental impacts

Social No anticipated impact to any one portion of the population

Administrative capability Land use board, construction code official and city engineers/planner could help

advise.




Priority High

Local planning mechanism Building Subcode

Responsible party Mayor & Council

Potential funding sources N/A - local staff time and local budget

Time line Ongoing


Action progress status Carried forward from the last version of the plan

Action Worksheet





Assessing the Risk


Risk finding Risks can increase unnecessarily when existing codes are not consistently and

appropriately enforced.



Action type Adopt and enforce building codes

Action description Code enforcement: Enforcement of State and Local Building Codes with Continual

CEO training. (prevention)



Losses avoided

(i.e., benefits)


avoided over time

Cost estimate $1,000

Cost effectiveness










Administrative capability Building committee of Council oversees code enforcement department


Other community objectives Also helps keeps community clean and safe and helps residents have pride in City


Priority High

Local planning mechanism Building Department

Responsible party Code Enforcement Officials


Time line Ongoing



Action Worksheet





Assessing the Risk


Risk finding Local plans can be updated to address natural disaster mitigation techniques.



Action type Incorporate mitigation into local planning

Action description 1.B. Ensure that local comprehensive plans incorporate natural disaster mitigation

techniques through a courtesy review of draft plans by the County Planning

Department (prevention)



Losses avoided

(i.e., benefits)


avoided over time

Cost estimate $1,000 or less

Cost effectiveness










Administrative capability Emergency Management Department




Priority Medium


Responsible party Emergency Management Department


Time line Ongoing



Action Worksheet





Assessing the Risk


Risk finding The general public's understanding of natural hazards and mitigation possibilities

could be improved. The community's overall level of disaster resistance would

increase if a greater number of households had a thorough understanding of their

risks and things they can do to reduce these risks.


Action category Education and awareness programs

Action type Multi- hazard education and risk awareness

Action description 2E. Update information on the local web site regarding preparing for emergencies to

incorporate profiled hazards not already discussed in these documents, and ensure

that the information continues to be maintained on the web site. (public education)



Losses avoided

(i.e., benefits)


avoided over time

Cost estimate $0

Cost effectiveness










Administrative capability Chief Financial officer & City Clerk can update website, County hosts site and can

make any changes we cannot do in-house

Local champion Mayor

Other community objectives Increase website presence


Priority High


Responsible party Finance & City Clerk Departments


Time line Ongoing



Action Worksheet





Assessing the Risk


Risk finding The general public's understanding of natural hazards and mitigation possibilities

could be improved. The community's overall level of disaster resistance would

increase if a greater number of households had a thorough understanding of their

risks and things they can do to reduce these risks.


Action category Education and awareness programs

Action type Multi-hazard education and risk awareness

Action description Hold periodic workshops for municipalities regarding zoning and planning issues that

arise regarding natural hazards and hazard mitigation.(prevention)



Losses avoided

(i.e., benefits)


avoided over time

Cost estimate $1,000 or less

Cost effectiveness










Administrative capability Land Use Board Secretary & City Clerk's Office could handle


Other community objectives Increase council interaction with public


Priority Medium

Local planning mechanism Land use Board

Responsible party Land Use Board & Mayor & Council


Time line Ongoing



Action Worksheet





Assessing the Risk


Risk finding The community's overall level of disaster resistance would increase if hazard

mitigation principles were more closely aligned with day-to-day operations and

activities.



Action type Integrate mitigation into local planning

Action description Ensure that the principles of this hazard mitigation plan are integrated into the new

and updated development plans/strategies. (prevention)



Losses avoided

(i.e., benefits)


avoided over time

Cost estimate Unknown

Cost effectiveness










Administrative capability Land Use Board

Local champion Land Use Board & Mayor & Council



Priority Medium

Local planning mechanism Land Use Board-update of Master Plant

Responsible party Land Use Board


Time line Ongoing



Action Worksheet


Guidance Memorandum #1: Outreach to the Public and Other Stakeholders Atlantic County, NJ – 2015 Plan Update Page 1 of 5

Give

Atlantic County Multi�Jurisdictional

Hazard Mitigation Plan Update

OUTREACH LOG: Summary of Outreach Activities to the General Public and Other Stakeholders

PARTICIPATING JURISDICTION: City of Egg Harbor

DATE OF ACTIVITY

TYPE OF ACTIVITY ACTIVITY DETAILS LEAD DEPARTMENT AND/OR STAFF TITLE WHO UNDERTOOK ACTIVITY

8/28/14 Discussion at Council Meeting Explain doing plan update with County

Jodi Kahn – Chief Financial Officer

11/13/14 Discussion at council meeting Give progress update after kickoff meeting


1/22/15 Discussion at council meeting Give progress update after last meeting


1/22/15 Place outreach info on website, local cable channel, and City bulletin board

Place outreach info provided by County on website and on City Bulletin Board


4/23/15 Discussion at City Council Meeting

Update on current status of plan update, let public know looking for input

Jodi Kahn.Chief Financial Officer

Guidance Memorandum #1: Outreach to the Public and Other Stakeholders Atlantic County, NJ – 2015 Plan Update Page 2 of 5

4/29/15 & 5/1/15

Have flyers available at School Wellness Fair & Green Team Movie Night

Flyers were given out and available at local school’s Wellness Fair and a movie showing of Bag It (environmental related film)

Jodi Kahn.Chief Financial Officer and Nanette Galloway.Green Team Chairperson

5/29/15 Emailed Land Use Board Chairman, Gary Mueller, to see if he can bring up at next land use board meeting

Emailed Land Use Board Chairman, Gary Mueller, to see if he can bring up at next land use board meeting – he responded that he would do that.

Jodi Kahn.Chief Financial Officer, Gary Mueller – Land Use Board Chairman….

5/29/15 Email Stakeholders E.mailed Stakeholders (schools, chamber of commerce, Atlanticare, ACUA, fire dept – to let them know participating in County plan update, gave them fact sheet and directed them to where can find more information. Spoke with fire chief and let him know about plan update.

Jodi Kahn.Chief Financial Officer

Please add additional pages as needed and return via email to Anna Foley at: [email protected]. For questions, please call 973�883�8500.

1.2.8 annex – egg harbor city page 1.2.8-1 · 1.2.8 annex – egg harbor city . page 1.2.8-1. ......

Documents