126th annual meeting and conference december 9, 2011 discussion of significant findings and...
TRANSCRIPT
126th Annual Meeting and ConferenceDecember 9, 2011
Discussion of Significant Findings and Aggregate Data Based on the Results
of the Endicott College Surveys for CPS High Schools
10:30 a.m. Venetian Room
1
Peter Hart, Executive DirectorEndicott College Research Center
2
Endicott Research Center
• CPSS – Commission on Public Secondary Schools
• CAISA / CIS – Commission on American International Schools Abroad / Council of International Schools (Madrid)
• Web page: www.endicottresearchcenter.net– FAQ’s, Sample Reports, Aggregate data available, this
presentation
• Other ERC work: School Performance Survey, Institutional Research, Custom Surveys, Economic Impact Statement
3
Over an eight-year period (2003/04 – 2010/11), we have surveyed:
517 CPSS schools334,338 Students35,070 Teachers and professional
staff81,327 Parents
4
In This Session
• Brief overview of the CPSS Surveys• Demographic data• Highs (responses over 85% in agreement)• Lows (responses under 50% in agreement)• Trends (results moving in the same direction
for eight years where applicable)• Questions / Remarks / Recommendations
– Slide numbers included so we can go back
5
Brief Overview - CPSS Surveys
• ~60 Public Secondary Schools per year• Survey questions developed from the CPSS
Standards and reviewed each year• Administered Online or Paper or Both• Dedicated Database Server for data collection• Students, Professional Staff and Parents• Data analysis, Final Report, Aggregate Report• Cost
6
CPSS Surveys – 2011 Standards
• Student Survey – 67 questions• Parent Survey – 58 questions• Professional Staff – 78 questions
– (Teachers, Administration, Non-teaching Professionals)
• Questions on Paper and Online are identical• Some questions worded so that gaps may be
revealed• Now in the third year
7
8
9
10
In This Session
• Brief overview of the CPSS Surveys• Demographic data• Highs (responses over 85% in agreement)• Lows (responses under 50% in agreement)• Trends (results moving in the same direction
for eight years where applicable)• Questions / Remarks / Recommendations
– Slide numbers included so we can go back
11
Student Demographic Data
Grade Level
2007/08 2009/10 2010/11
Grade 9 26.0% 25.5% 26.2%
Grade 10 25.4% 24.7% 25.7%
Grade 11 24.1% 25.3% 23.1%
Grade 12 21.4% 22.8% 21.4%
12
Student Demographic Data
Gender
2007/08 2009/10 2010/11
Male 49.3% 49.8% 48.8%
Female 50.7% 50.2% 51.2%
13
Professional StaffDemographic Data
Years Teaching# of
Years 2003/04 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08
<1-5 27.3% 24.7% 25.9% 24.9% 25.5%6-15 27.4% 29.5% 32.7% 34.9% 38.7%16+ 45.3% 45.8% 41.4% 40.2% 35.8%
14
# of Years 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11
<1-5 23.2% 37.0% 20.2%
6-15 39.0% 31.9% 43.3%
16+ 37.8% 31.1% 36.5%
Professional StaffDemographic Data
Highest Degree
Highest Degree 2003/04 2009/10 2010/11
Bachelor 30.4% 29.3% 24.4%
Master 25.5% 24.8% 28.1%
Master+ 41.5% 43.4% 45.3%
Doctorate 2.6% 2.4% 2.2%
15
Professional StaffDemographic Data
Gender
2003/04 2009/10 2010/11
Male 41.1% 38.8% 36.4%
Female 58.9% 61.2% 63.6%
16
ParentsDemographic Data
Number of Children in School
# of children 2003/04 2009/10 2010/11
1 45.1% 51.7% 52.0%2 37.3% 33.4% 32.6%3 13.0% 10.4% 11.4%4 3.4% 3.0% 3.0%
>4 1.2% 1.5% 1.0%
17
ParentsDemographic Data
Highest Level of Education
Highest Degree 2003/04 2009/10 2010/11
High School 35.8% 32.5% 24.5%
Associate 14.9% 12.5% 11.1%
Bachelor 27.8% 30.5% 29.7%
Master 17.3% 19.2% 22.1%
Doctorate 4.2% 5.3% 7.3%
18
In This Session
• Brief overview of the CPSS Surveys• Demographic data• Highs (responses over 85% in agreement)• Lows (responses under 50% in agreement)• Trends (results moving in the same direction
for eight years where applicable)• Questions / Remarks / Recommendations
– Slide numbers included so we can go back
19
“Teachers examine student work to improve their instructional practices.”
Standard 3: Instruction
2009/10 2010/11
Staff 85.4% 61.3%
20
“Teachers have formal opportunities to examine student work to improve their
instructional practices.” Changed in 2010
“Teachers maintain expertise in their content area and in content-specific
instructional practices.” Standard 3: Instruction
2009/10 2010/11
Staff 89.2% 91.1%
21
“My son’s/daughter’s teachers maintain expertise in their subject areas.
2009/10 2010/11
Parents 69.8% 73.0%
“Teachers support students in assuming responsibility for their learning.”
Standard 5: School Culture and Leadership
2009/10 2010/11
Staff 89.3% 90.7%
22
“The school encourages students to take responsibility for their learning.”
2009/10 2010/11
Parents 84.5% 89.9%
Highs - Recap
• Staff: 3• Parents: 0• Students: 0
23
In This Session
• Brief overview of the CPSS Surveys• Demographic data• Highs (responses over 85% in agreement)• Lows (responses under 50% in agreement)• Trends (results moving in the same direction
for eight years where applicable)• Questions / Remarks / Recommendations
– Slide numbers included so we can go back
24
“My teachers include topics from other subject areas in my courses.”
Standard 2: Curriculum
2009/10 2010/2011
Students 49.9% 51.0%
25
“My school provides opportunities for learning off-campus (e.g. field trips, internships, job shadowing, college
courses, etc.)” Standard 2: Curriculum
2009/10 2010/2011
Students 46.2% 45.0%
26
“The curriculum emphasizes cross-disciplinary learning.”
Standard 2: Curriculum
2009/10 2010/2011
Staff 46.5% 44.2%
27
“Co-curricular programs are adequately funded.”
Standard 2: Curriculum
2009/10 2010/2011
Staff 34.0% 33.1%
28
2009/10 2010/2011
Parents 40.1% 38.4%
“Teachers have sufficient time to be engaged in formal curriculum
evaluation, review and revision work.” Standard 2: Curriculum
2009/10 2010/2011
Staff 33.3% 38.8%
29
“My teachers personalize my instruction.”
Standard 3: Instruction
2009/10 2010/2011
Students 37.7% 39.2%
30
2009/10 2010/2011
Staff 79.4% 81.6%
“Teachers personalize instruction to support the achievement of the school’s learning expectations.”
“My teachers spend one-on-one time with me.”
Standard 3: Instruction
2009/10 2010/2011
Students 41.8% 44.4%
31
“My teachers ask for my ideas/opinions to improve how they
teach.” Standard 3: Instruction
2009/10 2010/2011
Students 38.5% 39.7%
32
2009/10 2010/2011
Parents 19.1% 21.8%
“My son’s/daughter’s teachers have asked me for feedback about their instructional practices.
“I use the school-wide analytic rubrics when assessing student work.”
Standard 4: Assessment Of and For Student Learning
2009/10 2010/2011
Staff 38.2% 35.0%
33
“Students respect teachers.” Standard 5: School Culture and Leadership
2009/10 2010/2011
Students 45.1% 49.0%
34
“Students respect one another.” Standard 5: School Culture and Leadership
2009/10 2010/2011
Students 37.0% 40.3%
35
“My school has a program which provides me with an adult in school, in
addition to my guidance counselor, with whom I meet regularly and who
knows me well.” Standard 5: School Culture and Leadership
2009/10 2010/2011
Students 36.3% 45.5%
36
“Students have input in important decisions made at my school.” Standard 5: School Culture and Leadership
2009/10 2010/2011
Students 42.2% 42.0%
37
“The school has timely and coordinated intervention strategies for all students,
including at-risk students.” Standard 6: School Resources for Learning
2009/10 2010/2011
Parents 48.9% 53.5%
38
“I meet with my school counselor regularly.”
Standard 6: School Resources for Learning
2009/10 2010/2011
Students 25.6% 26.1%
39
2009/10 2010/2011
Parents 43.1% 45.6%
“The school counseling personnel meet regularly with my son/daughter to discuss personal, academic, career and college topics/planning.”
“We use the library often during classes.”
Standard 6: School Resources for Learning
2009/10 2010/2011
Students 28.7% 31.6%
40
“The library/information services program has an adequate number of
certified/licensed personnel and support staff.”
Standard 6: School Resources for Learning
2009/10 2010/2011
Parents 48.2% 52.3%
41
“My son/daughter uses the library/media center’s resources on a
regular basis.” Standard 6: School Resources for Learning
2009/10 2010/2011
Parents 46.1% 50.4%
42
“The support services program has an adequate number of certified/licensed
personnel and support staff for identified students, including special education, 504 and English language
learners.” Standard 6: School Resources for Learning
2009/10 2010/2011
Parents 45.8% 47.9%
43
“The community and the district’s governing body provide dependable funding for a wide range of programs
and services.” Standard 7: Community Resources for Learning
2009/10 2010/2011
Staff 41.5% 39.6%
44
2009/10 2010/2011
Parents 48.4% 45.5%
“My community provides dependable funding for programs and services.”
“The community and the district’s governing body provide dependable funding for professional and support
staff.” Standard 7: Community Resources for Learning
2009/10 2010/2011
Staff 41.4% 39.2%
45
2009/10 2010/2011
Parents 51.1% 48.6%
“My community provides dependable funding for staffing (building administrators, teachers and support staff).
“The community and the district’s governing body provide dependable
funding for instructional materials and supplies.”
Standard 7: Community Resources for Learning
2009/10 2010/2011
Staff 43.2% 42.4%
46
“I have input into the development of the school budget.”
Standard 7: Community Resources for Learning
2009/10 2010/2011
Staff 27.0% 26.2%
47
“The school has a long-range plan to address facilities, future programs, services, staffing levels, and capital
improvements.” Standard 7: Community Resources for Learning
2009/10 2010/2011
Staff 43.6% 42.2%
48
Low’s Recap
• Staff: 10• Parents: 9• Students: 11
49
In This Session
• Brief overview of the CPSS Surveys• Demographic data• Highs (responses over 85% in agreement)• Lows (responses under 50% in agreement)• Trends (results moving in the same direction
for eight years where applicable)• Questions / Remarks / Recommendations
– Slide numbers included so we can go back
50
“The school’s Mission Statement embodies what the community values and believes about student learning.”
Old Standard 1: Mission
56%58%60%62%64%66%68%
2003/04 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08
Parents
51
“The school’s core values and beliefs represent what the community values about student learning.” 2009/10: 68.1%, 2010/11: 72.7%
“I know the civic expectations that the school has for my child.”
Standard 1: Mission
58%60%62%64%66%68%70%72%
2003/04 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08
Parents
52“The school’s learning expectations (academic, social and civic) are challenging.” 2009-10: 71.1%, 2010/11: 75.3%
“I use school-wide rubrics in assessing student work.” Standard 1: Mission
53
I use the school-wide analytic rubrics when assessing student work.” 2009-10: 38.2%, 2010/11: 35.0%
“My teachers spend one on one time with me if I need it.”
Standard 5: Leadership & Organization
54“My teachers spend one on one time with me.” 2009/10: 42%, 2010/11: 44.4%
“I feel safe at school.”
55%60%65%70%75%80%
Students
55
“Teachers respect students.”
52%56%60%64%68%
Students
56
“Students respect teachers.”
0%
20%
40%
60%
Students
57
“Students respect one another.”
30%
35%
40%
45%
Students
58
“I think bullying is a problem at school.”
0%10%20%30%40%
Students
59
“I am proud of my school.”
0%20%40%60%80%
Students
60
“At school, I know who to ask for help if I have a personal problem.”
0%20%40%60%80%
100%
Students
61
“We use the library often during classes.”
20%
30%
40%
Students
62
“The library has the materials I need.”
50%
60%
70%
Students
63
“My parents participate in school programs.”
20%
30%
40%
Students
64
“Furniture and equipment in my classrooms are in good condition.”
40%
50%
60%
Students
65
“The school building is clean and well maintained.”
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11
Students
Parents
Staff
66
“My teachers use a variety of methods to assess my learning.” “Teachers use a variety of methods to assess my child’s
learning.”
0%20%40%60%80%
100%
Students
Parents
67
68
Thank you
70