12052 finnkoli apparels ltd fuin_structural v4.2

8/15/2019 12052 Finnkoli Apparels Ltd FUiN_Structural v4.2

1/10

Factory Name Finnkoli Apparels

Ltd.

Accord ID 12052

Factory Address

Inspection Date

Date of ReviewInspection

Inspected by

Item

No

Accord

Observation

Accord

Recommendation Accord Timeline Final Action Plan

Final

Timeline(

DD/MM/

YYYY)

Comments after Physical

Inspection

Progress

StatusPictorial Evidence

1 Verify concrete

strengths incolumns in Building

2 (old building)

Factory Engineer to

review design, loadsand columns stresses

inBuilding 2.

within 6-weeks The buiding engineer

has already assessedthe loads and coulmn

stresses in building twowhile adding the twonew buildins with it.

Howevr, Factoryengineer promised to

come review thedesign, loads and

columns stresses inBuilding 2 which will

take some time. henceextentended time is

requested.

26 -02-2016 Previous T imeLine :

31/07/2015Committed TimeLine:

26/02/2016This issue is required to becovered in the Engineering

Assessment (EA) report.During first follow-up

inspection, EA submissiondeadline was extended up to

30 August, 2015. Somedrawings were present in the

factory during inspection butEA report was not submitted.

In Progress

2 Verify concrete

strengths incolumns in Building

2 (old building)

Verify insitu concrete

strengths either bytaking 100mm

diametercores from a minimum

of 4 columns or byusing existing cylinder

strength data if

available

w it hi n 6-weeks we have a lr eady

selected a reputedconsulting firm

to Verify insitutionconcrete strengths

either by taking 100mmdiameter

cores from a minimum

of 4 columns



26/02/2016In situ concrete strength

verification is required to becovered in the Engineering Assessment (EA) report.

During first follow-upinspection, EA submission

deadline was extended up to15 October, 2015. Some

drawings were present in the


In Progress

Abu Bakar Md. Siddique

Structural Safety nspection

Plot No. 18 & 20, Road #11, Kadmtoly 1/A, Shyampur, Dhaka

02/24/2015

24-Feb-16


2/10

Item

No

Accord

Observation

Accord


Final

Timeline(

DD/MM/

YYYY)


Inspection

Progress


3 Verify concretestrengths in

columns in Building2 (old building)

Produce and activelymanage a loading plan

for all floor plateswithin the factory

giving consideration tofloor capacity andcolumn capacity

within 6-months Building Engineer hasStatrted working on this

point. As soon aspossible we will try to

complete this

26 -02-2016 Previous T imeLine :30/11/2015

Committed TimeLine:26/02/2016

Loading plan is required to besubmitted with the EA report,

which was not submitted

during inspection. Factorymanagement was required to

maintain the live load under 2kPa but during inspection,

heavy loading was found inmost of the area. No height

marking for load management

was observed.

Corrected

4 Check st ructure forhigh loading from

boilers, machineryand crane

New boiler on secondfloor of Boiler House

(Building 3) and craneon roof of

Building 2 should not

be used until designchecks detailed below

are completed.•

within 6-weeks The boiler buoílding isspecially and carefully

designed to hold theboiler. Material wereused that way to be

able to hold the load.What is asked by you

is not understood. Thecrane is like a toy

which is visible fromthe picture too. It was

used to carry very

small quantities ofbricks or few bags of

cement to the roof forconstruction purpose.

Any way, it is alreadymoved from the roof.

Buliding Engineer alsoworking on it

26-02-2016 Previous Timeline: 31/07/2015Committed Timeline:

26/02/2016The crane was removed and

the boiler in 1st floor was

found to be in use. The boilerin second floor was not found

under use during inspection. Adequacy check of this

structure is required to beincluded in the EA, which was

not submitted.

In Progress


3/10

Item

No

Accord

Observation

Accord


Final

Timeline(

DD/MM/

YYYY)


Inspection

Progress




Building engineer tocheck that Boiler

House loading iswithin design limits

andadvise on appropriate

load

reduction/remedialmeasures if required.

within 6-weeks The buiding engineerhas already assessed

the loads and coulmnstresses in building two

while adding the twonew buildins with it.

Howevr, Factory

engineer promised tocome review the

design, and yourdemand which will take

some time. henceextentended time is

requested.



the boiler in 1st floor wasfound to be in use. The boilerin second floor was not found


structure is required to beincluded in the EA, which was

not submitted.

In Progress



Building engineer tocheck that the load

from machinery iswithin design limits

and advise on

appropriate loadreduction/remedial

measures if required

within 6-weeks The buiding engineerhas already assessed

the loads and coulmnstresses in building two

while adding the two

new buildins with it.Howevr, Factory

engineer promised tocome review thedesign, and your

demand which will takesome time. hence

extentended time isrequested.




found to be in use. The boilerin second floor was not found

under use during inspection. Adequacy check of thisstructure is required to be

included in the EA, which wasnot submitted.

In Progress

7 Check st ructure for

high loading from


Building engineer to

check roof of Building

2 for load from craneand advise on

appropriate load

reduction/remedialmeasures if required

within 6-weeks Crane has been

removed.

26-02-2016 Previous Timeline: 31/07/2015

Committed Timeline:



found to be in use. The boilerin second floor was not foundunder use during inspection.

Adequacy check of thisstructure is required to be


In Progress


4/10

Item

No

Accord

Observation

Accord


Final

Timeline(

DD/MM/

YYYY)


Inspection

Progress




Carry out loadreduction or remedial

measures as advisedby the

Building Engineer

within 6-months Bui ld ing EngineerWorking on it



the boiler in 1st floor wasfound to be in use. The boilerin second floor was not found


structure and remedialmeasures are required to be


In Progress

9 Check st ructure for

high loading fromboilers, machinery

and crane

Continue to manage

loads in these areas toremain within design

limits

within 6-months As soon as the loading

plan will be preparedas per law 147 we will

start following it.


Committed Timeline:26/02/2016

The crane was removed andthe boiler in 1st floor was

found to be in use. The boilerin second floor was not foundunder use during inspection.

Adequacy check of thisstructure and loading limits

are required to be included inthe EA, which was not

submitted.

In Progress

10 Check s ta ir s f orload from

additional steps(Building 2)

Check stairs for loadfrom additional steps

within 6-weeks Done 26-02-2016 Previous Timeline: 25/06/2015Committed Timeline:

26/02/2016The factory management

removed the additional stepsfrom the stair slab. But the

slab still needs to be checked.The adequacy check of thestair slab is required to be

included in the EA report,which was not submitted.

In Progress


5/10

Item

No

Accord

Observation

Accord


Final

Timeline(

DD/MM/

YYYY)


Inspection

Progress



additional steps(Building 2)

Prop stairs if designfound to be

inadequate

within 6-weeks Done 26-02-2016 Previous Timeline: 25/06/2015Committed Timeline:

26/02/2016The factory management


slab still needs to be checked.

The adequacy check of thestair slab is required to be

included in the EA report,which was not submitted. No

propping was done.

In Progress


additional steps

(Building 2)

Remove steps andreplace with lighter

material (e.g. timber)if

structure found to be

inadequate.

within 6-months Done 26-02-2016 Previous Timeline: 25/06/2015Committed Timeline:

26/02/2016

The factory management


slab still needs to be checked.The adequacy check of the

stair slab is required to beincluded in the EA report,

which was not submitted.

In Progress

13 Control loading instorage areas

Building Engineer toensure the structure is

not loadedbeyond capacity

within 6-weeks Bui ld ing Engineerwotking on it

26-02-2016 Previous Timeline: 31/07/2015 Committed Timeline:

26/02/2016This issue is required to be

covered in the EA, which wasnot submitted during the timeof inspection. The live load

was found above 2kPa inseveral panels. No active load

management system or heightmarking was present in the

factory.

In Progress


6/10

Item

No

Accord

Observation

Accord


Final

Timeline(

DD/MM/

YYYY)


Inspection

Progress



Produce and activelymanage a loading plan

for all floorplates within the

factory givingconsideration to floorcapacity and column

capacity.

within 6-weeks After completing theengineering

Assessment, theconsulting firm will

provide us a feasibleloading plan

considering to the

building structuralhealth and we shall

maintain the loadingconsidering our own

safety issue as well


26/02/2016Loading plan is required to be

included in the EA, which wasnot submitted during the timeof inspection. The live load

was found above 2kPa inseveral panels. No active load

management system or heightmarking was present in the

factory.

In Progress


Continue to implementload plan

within 6-months After completing theengineering

Assessment, the

consulting firm will

provide us a feasibleloading plan

considering to thebuilding structural

health and we shallmaintain the loading

considering our ownsafety issue as well


26/02/2016

Load plan is required to be

included in the EA, which wasnot submitted during the timeof inspection. The live loadwas found above 2kPa in

several panels. No active loadmanagement system or height

marking was present in thefactory.

In Progress

16 Structural drawings

not consistent withthe as-constructedarrangement of the

factory.Building permit not

available

Building Engineer to

survey as constructedbuilding. Updated

drawings to be

prepared showing thecorrect as constructed

layout

within 6-weeks Bui ld ing Engineer

Working on it aftercomplete then we

submit the drawing on

Accord



Updated drawings are

required to be covered in theEngineering Assessment (EA)

report. During first follow-upinspection, EA submission

deadline was extended up to30 August, 2015. Some

drawings were present in the


In Progress


7/10

Item

No

Accord

Observation

Accord


Final

Timeline(

DD/MM/

YYYY)


Inspection

Progress


17 Structural drawingsnot consistent with

the as-constructedarrangement of the

factory.Building permit not

available

Building engineer todetermine were

discrepancies existbetween as

drawings and as builtlayout.

within 6-weeks Bui ld ing EngineerWorking on it after

complete then wesubmit the drawing on

Accord



Updated drawings arerequired to be covered in theEngineering Assessment (EA)

report. During first follow-upinspection, EA submission

deadline was extended up to30 August, 2015. Some

drawings were present in thefactory during inspection butEA report was not submitted.

In Progress

18 Structural drawingsnot consistent with

the as-constructedarrangement of the

factory.

Building permit notavailable

Structure to bechecked for as

constructed layout,particularly foroffset columns.

within 6-weeks Bui ld ing EngineerWorking on it after

complete then wesubmit the drawing on

Accord



This issue is required to be

covered in the Engineering Assessment (EA) report.

During first follow-upinspection, EA submission

deadline was extended up to

30 August, 2015. Somedrawings were present in the


In Progress

19 Structural drawings

not consistent withthe as-constructed

arrangement of thefactory.

Building permit not

available

Obtain building permit within 6-months During the Audit t ime

we had showed thepermit copy to the

Auditor, but we can'tunderstand what's theproblem with this. Any

way when we willsubmit all document

with the DE report thenwe will provide thisdocument again.



26/02/2016The permit documents are

required to be included with

the EA report. During firstfollow-up inspection, EA

submission deadline wasextended up to 30 August,2015. Some drawings were

present in the factory duringinspection but EA report was

not submitted.

In Progress


8/10

Item

No

Accord

Observation

Accord


Final

Timeline(

DD/MM/

YYYY)


Inspection

Progress


20 Columns i n t hedelivery area in the

south of Building 2(old building) are

susceptible toimpact from

delivery vehicles

Building Engineer toreview column design

and potential forvehicle impact to

columns at southernend of building in

material delivery area.

If appropriate, impactprotection to be

provided

within 6-months Done 26-02-2016 Previous TimeLine:25/06/2015


Column adequacy is requiredto be covered in the EAreport, which was not

submitted. Vehicle impactprotection system was

provided in one column.

In Progress

21 Repai r o f col umn

on north eastelevation and in

basement

Columns to be

repaired by reinstatingcolumn section with

concrete of samestrength as specified

in original design

within 6-months Done 26-02-2016 Previous TimeLine:


26/02/2016Column was found to be

repaired during inspection. Adequacy of these columnsare required to be verified by

the factory engineer.

In Progress

22 Repai r o f col umn

on north eastelevation and in

basement

Drainage channel in

basement to bediverted away fromstructure or water

redirected down a pipe

within 6-months Done 26-02-2016 Previous TimeLine:


26/02/2016

Factory management did nottake any actions regarding

drainage channel relocation.

In Progress

23 Repai r o f col umnon north east

elevation and inbasement

Check RC walls inbasement have not

been damaged. Repairif

required

within 6-months Done 26-02-2016 Previous TimeLine:25/06/2015


Factory management did nottake any actions regarding this

issue. Marks of water ingresswas observed during

inspection.

In Progress


9/10

Item

No

Accord

Observation

Accord


Final

Timeline(

DD/MM/

YYYY)


Inspection

Progress


24 Non -engineeredsteelwork roofs

over south stairsand above building

2 (old building)roof

Building Engineer tocheck the capacity of

the lightweight roofsand their supports,

and implement anynecessary structural

works

w it hi n 6-months Wil l be done i n t ime. 26 -02-2016 Previous T imeLine :30/09/2015


No action was taken regardingthis issue. During inspection,lightweight steel sheds are

found to be corroded andpieces of shed was about to

fall off owing to excessivecorrosion and cause serious

safety hazard.

In Progress

25 Stair columns,

Beams and stairslab was found as

damaged andcracked dew to

corrosion

Repair those stair

slab, columns andbeams immediately.



Factory management did nottake any action for repairing

those columns, beams andslabs.

In Progress

26 Stair columns,

Beams and stairslab was found as

damaged andcracked dew to

corrosion

Review the design of

that stair column andbeams by considering

this phenomena.



Design review of thesecolumns and beams are

required to be covered in the

EA, which was not submitted.

In Progress


10/10

Item

No

Accord

Observation

Accord


Final

Timeline(

DD/MM/

YYYY)


Inspection

Progress


27 No water proofingmembrane was

found.

Provide water proofingmembrane on roof to

prevent water ingress.


26/02/2016No water proofing membrane

was observed for preventionof water ingress in roof.Storage of wastes and

construction material over roofwas observed during

inspection. All the exposedreinforcement was corroded

and the roof surface becameslippery owing to the absence

of drainage system.

In Progress

12052 finnkoli apparels ltd fuin_structural v4.2

Documents