12 sub sea lifting oper

37
1 Subsea lifting operations Hydrodynamic properties of subsea structures

Upload: architectintx

Post on 07-Apr-2015

169 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 12 Sub Sea Lifting Oper

1

Subsea lifting operations

Hydrodynamic properties of subsea structures

Page 2: 12 Sub Sea Lifting Oper

2

Hydrodynamic properties for subseastructures• Content

– Forces on structures during crossing of the splash-zone.• Landing on bottom

– Hydrodynamic phenomena.– Hydrodynamic coefficients.

• Theoretical and experimental methods• Actual values.

– Summary

Page 3: 12 Sub Sea Lifting Oper

3

Phases of the installation process

• 1) Lift-off from deck.• 2) Lift in air• 3) Crossing splash zone.• 4) Lowering through the water column• 5) Landing the structure.

12

3

4

5

Page 4: 12 Sub Sea Lifting Oper

4

Natural periodsPendulum in air:

Pendulum in water:

( )111 2

m A LT

mg gVπ

ρ+

=−

( )222 2

m A LT

mg gVπ

ρ+

=−

( )333 2 Em A L

TEA

πα+

=

1,2 2 LTg

π=

3 2 EmLTEA

πα

=

Page 5: 12 Sub Sea Lifting Oper

5

Water entry of TOGP template (2000)

Page 6: 12 Sub Sea Lifting Oper

6

Water entry of TOGP template (2000)

Page 7: 12 Sub Sea Lifting Oper

7

Water exit of ROV

Page 8: 12 Sub Sea Lifting Oper

8

Water entry forces, calm water.

V

• Vertical hydrodynamic force:

2333 33h z z

dAF gV A U Udh

ρ= + +

z

xz = 0

h

Uz

Hydrostatic Added mass Slamming

Page 9: 12 Sub Sea Lifting Oper

9

Water entry forces, including waves

• Vertical hydrodynamic force:

z

x

ζ

V

z = 0 h

( ) ( )

( ) ( )

2333 33

1 2

hdAF gV V Adh

B B

ρ ρ ς ς η ς η

ς η ς η ς η

= + + − + −

+ − + − −

”Slamming term”Position dependent added mass

Page 10: 12 Sub Sea Lifting Oper

10

Interpretation of the terms

( ) ( )

( ) ( )

23 33 3 3

1 2

hd AF gV V Adh

B B

ρ ρ ς ς η ς η

ς η ς η ς η

= + + − + −

+ − + − −gVρ : Buoyancy force

Vρ ς : ”Froude Krilof” force. Effect dynamic pressure in incident wave

( )33A ς η− : Disturbance effect of body. Added mass times relative acceleration.

( )233dAdh

ς η− : ”Slamming term”, Effect of time dependent added mass.

( )1B ς η− ( )2B ς η ς η− − : Linear and quadratic damping effect.

Page 11: 12 Sub Sea Lifting Oper

11

Water entry force, basis for derivationAppendix E, Lecture Notes

• Ideal, non-viscous, non-compressible fluid• Fast water entry

– Local fluid accelerations >>g.– Added mass coefficient for infinite frequency

• No viscous effects– Added as separate terms

• Body dimensions << wave length• Solved as a perturbation to the incident wave field • Similar expression valid for horizontal loads.

Page 12: 12 Sub Sea Lifting Oper

12

Water entry – Key elements in derivation

Momentum in the fluid inside Ω :

Ω

M ρVdΩ= ∫∫∫ Here V is the velocity vector of the fluid inΩ . Time derivative of the momentum:

nS

dM Vρ d ρ VU dSdt tΩ

∂= Ω +

∂∫∫∫ ∫∫

NOTE:In derivation:

Water volume: ΩSubmerged body vol.: Ω*

Velocity: VAbove:

Submerged volume: VVelocity: η

Page 13: 12 Sub Sea Lifting Oper

13

• Invoke Euler’s equation (Relation between pressure and velocity in incompressibel fluid)

• Use Gauss theorem (Relation between volume integral and integralover surface enclosing the volume)

• Show that the far field contribution from a source plus its image vanishes.

• Assume at free surface.• Evaluate the contribution of each term to the integrals • Finds

• Reformulate:

0ϕ =

( ) *3 33 ρdF A V g

dt= + Ω

( ) *3 33

*3333

2 *3333

ρ

ρ

ρ

dF A V gdt

dA dh dVV A gdh dt dt

dA V A V gdh

= + Ω

= + + Ω

= + + Ω

Page 14: 12 Sub Sea Lifting Oper

14

• “Slamming term”: Always upward force.• Water exit: at free surface questionable.• “Slamming term” neglected in most water exit

implementations.

• Enclosed water / drainage very important during exit

0

Water entry versus water exit

ϕ =

*3 33 ρExitF A V g+ Ω

Page 15: 12 Sub Sea Lifting Oper

15

Flow during water entry vs water exit.(Greenhow & Lin 1983)

Page 16: 12 Sub Sea Lifting Oper

16

Classical slamming solutions.

2R 2R

Von Karman (1929) Wagner (1932)

2 2

1 1 22 2

VonKarman : Wagner : 2

s s s z s z

s

s

F C AU C RLU

CC

ρ ρ

ππ

= =

==

Page 17: 12 Sub Sea Lifting Oper

17

Added mass for simple structures.Horizontal circular cylinder

-1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 30

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1 Added mass for horizontal 2D cylinder. φ = 0 at z = 0

Submergence h/r

A33

/ ρπ

r2

Analytical expressionsAsymptotic values

-1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 30

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1Derivative of A33 for horizontal 2D cylinder.

φ = 0 at z = 0

Submergence, h/r

(dA

33/d

h)ρπ

r Numerical differentiationAsymptotic value

h

2R

φ=0

Page 18: 12 Sub Sea Lifting Oper

18

Added mass for simple structures.Sphere

-3 -2.5 -2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 10

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

zc/R

Aii/ ρ

R3

Added mass for sphere, infinite frequency

A11A33

Page 19: 12 Sub Sea Lifting Oper

19

Added mass for simple structures.Sphere

-3 -2.5 -2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 10

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5A

ii/ ρR

3

zc/R

Added mass for sphere, zero frequency

A11A33

Page 20: 12 Sub Sea Lifting Oper

20

Close to bottom

• No action from waves• Modified ”slamming term”• Added mass for body close to ”fixed wall” (Zero frequency limit)

Page 21: 12 Sub Sea Lifting Oper

21

Close to bottom233

3 33

1 2

0.5hdAF gV Adh

B B

ρ η η

η η η

= − −

− −

h

2R

33 0dAdh<

Page 22: 12 Sub Sea Lifting Oper

22

A33 2D cylinder close to bottom

1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8 30

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5Added mass for horizontal 2D cylinder. dφ/dz = 0 at z = 0

Centre distance from wall h/r

A33

/ ρπ

r2

π2/3-1

Page 23: 12 Sub Sea Lifting Oper

23 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 51

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

5

h/R

A33

/ ρR

3

WAMIT results for t/R=0.05Asymptotic results for h/R<<1Asymptotic results for h/R>>1

Circular disc close to bottom

• Far from bottom h/R >>1:• Close to wall (Vinje 2001):

333

83

A Rρ=

Page 24: 12 Sub Sea Lifting Oper

24

Perforated plate, circular hollows, potential theory• Plate L*B= 15m*10m• (0) 2

33 0.625A LBρ=

Page 25: 12 Sub Sea Lifting Oper

25

Suction anchor

• Fully submerged, no ventilation (a=0)

2R

2a

H2

11

233

α , α = 0.6 - 1(plus enclosed water)

413

A R H

RA R HH

ρπ

ρπ

=

⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥+⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦

Page 26: 12 Sub Sea Lifting Oper

26

Suction anchor

• Fully submerged, with ventilation

2R

2a

H

Page 27: 12 Sub Sea Lifting Oper

27

• Partly submerged, with ventilation– Free air flow

– Restricted airflow?

Suction anchor

2R

2a

H

33 0A

Page 28: 12 Sub Sea Lifting Oper

28

Subsea template w/protection grilleTroll

Page 29: 12 Sub Sea Lifting Oper

29

Templates with cover and mudmats.Range of experimental results

Page 30: 12 Sub Sea Lifting Oper

30

Template. Numerical results.Sensitivity to period and draft.

Heave Added Mass as a Function of Wave Period

-5000

50010001500200025003000

0 10 20 30 40

Wave Period [s]

Add

ed M

ass

[t]

D = 3.5 m

D = 4.0 m

D = 4.5 m

Page 31: 12 Sub Sea Lifting Oper

31

Protection cover made from tubularmembers. (approx 14 * 19m)

Page 32: 12 Sub Sea Lifting Oper

32

Experimental determination of added massand damping. Free oscillation tests Marintek

Page 33: 12 Sub Sea Lifting Oper

33

Computed and measured added massProtection cover

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

0 0.5 1 1.5KC

Ca

Measured

Perforated plate

Sum of cylinders w/ interaction

2 AXKCB

π=

Page 34: 12 Sub Sea Lifting Oper

34

Effect of pressure drop. Protection cover

2

12

: Porosity, open area/total area: Discharge coeff. ( 0.5 -1)

p v vτ ρμτ

τμ

−Δ =

∼Added mass

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3

Amplitude (m)

A_3

3/10

00 (k

g)

MolinMeasured

Page 35: 12 Sub Sea Lifting Oper

35

Protection cover – linearized damping

Linearized damping

0

200

400

600

800

1000

0 1 2 3Amplitude (m)

B1

(kN

s/m

)

MolinMeasured

Page 36: 12 Sub Sea Lifting Oper

36

Effect of pressure drop.Sensitivity to discharge ratio

0

5

10

15

20

0 0.5 1 1.5 2

KC

A_3

3 (k

g)

mju = 0.75mju = 0.5mju = 1.0

Page 37: 12 Sub Sea Lifting Oper

37

Summary• Proper added mass values crucial to find wave loads during

installation. • Water entry equations contain a ”slamming term”.• In splash zone: Added mass sensitive to submergence and frequency.• By landing on bottom an increased added mass may contribute to

softer landing.• Numerical and experimental tools available to find added mass and

damping.• Viscous effects important. • Depth dependent values difficult to establish.• Theoretical expressions exist for several simple shapes.