112th congress first session • 2011

1

112th CongressFirst Session • 2011

American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO

AFSCME selects a few roll-call votes from the

hundreds cast by members of Congress every

session. In choosing these votes, AFSCME

attempts to fairly represent a lawmaker’s

position on issues determined to be important

to AFSCME members — first and foremost as

workers, but also as citizens and union broth-

ers and sisters.

This voting scorecard is one of the key

factors used in making judgments on

AFSCME campaign support, endorsements

or contributions from PEOPLE — AFSCME’s

Political Action Committee or PAC. Other

important factors often include the member’s

official leadership position, chairmanship or

seniority on important committees, leader-

ship in a state’s congressional delegation,

and accessibility and responsiveness to

AFSCME’s lobbying efforts.

Visit AFSCME’s website at afscme.org to

obtain AFSCME e-News, weekly reports, letters

to congressional members and votes. Ques-

tions concerning the selection of the votes

or other aspects of a member’s record are

welcome. Write to AFSCME Department of

Legislation, 1625 L Street, NW, Washington,

DC 20036-5687, or call 800-732-8120.

How to Judge a Member’s Voting Record

Congressional Scorecard

3

2010 House Vote Descriptions

1. Repealing Health Care Reform AFSCME Position: No

The House of Representatives passed the Repealing the Job-Killing Health Care Law Act (H.R. 2), which would repeal the historic health care reform law including its provisions to bring down skyrocketing costs, shore up Medicare’s bottom line, end insurance company abuses and expand coverage to millions of working families.

House Vote Number 14

AFSCME opposed the bill, which the House approved by a vote of 245 to 189 on January 19, 2011.

2. Immediate Cuts to Critical Government Programs

AFSCME Position: No The House of Representatives passed the Full-Year Continuing Appropriations Act (H.R. 1). This bill would have made deep, immediate cuts in financial aid to state and local governments, forcing the loss of more jobs and reducing services carried out by state and local governments through the end of 2011.

House Vote Number 147 AFSCME opposed the bill, which the House approved by a vote of 235-189 on February 19, 2011.

3. The Ryan Budget AFSCME Position: No

The House of Representatives passed the Concurrent Resolution on the Budget for Fiscal Year 2012 (H. Con. Res 34), which would replace Medicare with a private insurance voucher that would substantially increase the costs for seniors; dramatically reduce federal funds paid to states to operate the Medicaid program; lay a path for cuts to Social Security; and force huge cuts in funding for state and local government.

House Vote Number 277 AFSCME opposed the bill, which the House approved by a vote of 235-193 on April 15, 2011.

Key: 4 voted with AFSCME’s position; 8 voted against AFSCME’s position; ? did not vote. Key: 4 voted with AFSCME’s position; 8 voted against AFSCME’s position; ? did not vote.

Vote Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Session Support (percent)

Career Cumulative Record

AFSCME Position N N N N N N N Right Wrong % Right

4

4. Cut, Cap and Balance AFSCME Position: No

The House of Representatives passed the Cut, Cap and Balance Act of 2011 (H.R. 2560), which would impose over $100 billion in immediate budget cuts, require a two-thirds majority to raise any revenues, and impose caps on government spending levels in subsequent years that would force significant cuts to Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security and huge reductions in funding to state and local governments.


AFSCME opposed the bill, which the House approved by a vote of 234-190 on July 19, 2011.

5. Limiting the National Labor Relations Board

AFSCME Position: No The House of Representatives passed the Protecting Jobs from Government Interference Act (H.R. 2587), which would dramatically reduce the worker protections historically covered under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) by limiting the rights and obligations of the parties to bargain collectively and seriously impairing the National Labor Relations Board’s (NLRB) authority to correct labor abuses.


AFSCME opposed the bill, which the House approved by a vote of 238-186 on September 15, 2011.

6. Balanced Budget Amendment AFSCME Position: No

The House of Representatives failed to reach the supermajority required to pass the Balanced Budget Constitutional Amendment Act (H.J. Res 2), which would have capped government spending at 18 percent of Gross Domestic

Product, make deep and sweeping cuts to government programs indiscriminately, and require a supermajority to raise any future revenues.House Vote Number 858

AFSCME opposed the bill, which failed (261-165) to reach the 284 votes required for passage on November 18, 2011..

7. Limiting Workers’ Right to Form a UnionAFSCME Position: No

TThe House of Representatives passed the Workforce Democracy and Fairness Act (H.R. 3094), which would allow employers to indefinitely delay scheduling the election for workers to choose whether to join a union and deny workers’ ability to hear cases brought before the NLRB.


AFSMCE opposed the bill, which the House approved by a vote of 235-188 on November 30, 2011.

5Key: 4 voted with AFSCME’s position; 8 voted against AFSCME’s position; ? did not vote. Key: 4 voted with AFSCME’s position; 8 voted against AFSCME’s position; ? did not vote.

House Voting Record 2011









Repe

alin

g H

ealth

Car

e Re

form

Lim

iting

Wor

kers

’ Rig

ht to

Form

a U

nion

The

Ryan

Bud

get

Cut,

Cap

and

Bala

nce

Lim

iting

the

Nat

iona

l Lab

or R

elat

ions

Boa

rd

Bala

nced

Bud

get A

men

dmen

t

Imm

edia

te C

uts t

o Cr

itica

l Gov

ernm

ent P

rogr

ams

Alabama

1 Bonner, Jo (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 6 66 8%

2 Roby (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 7 0%

3 Rogers, Mike D. (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 12 61 16%

4 Aderholt (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 14 107 12%

5 Brooks (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 7 0%

6 Bachus, S. (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 8 158 5%

7 Sewell (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 8 100% 7 0 100%

Alaska

AL Young, D. (R) 8 8 8 ? 4 8 4 33% 100 233 31%

Arizona

1 Gosar (D) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 7 0%

2 Franks, T. (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 72 0%

3 Quayle (R) 8 ? 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 6 0%

4 Pastor (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 189 5 97%

5 Schweikert (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 7 0%

6 Flake (R) 8 4 8 8 8 8 8 14% 6 85 7%

7 Grijalva (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 72 0 100%

8 Giffords (D) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 33 2 94%

Arkansas

1 Crawford(R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 7 0%

2 Griffin(R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 7 0%

3 Womack (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 7 0%

4 Ross, M. (D) 8 4 4 4 8 8 ? 50% 79 12 87%

6 Key: 4 voted with AFSCME’s position; 8 voted against AFSCME’s position; ? did not vote. Key: 4 voted with AFSCME’s position; 8 voted against AFSCME’s position; ? did not vote.






Repe

alin

g H

ealth

Car

e Re

form

Lim

iting

Wor

kers

’ Rig

ht to

Form

a U

nion

The

Ryan

Bud

get

Cut,

Cap

and

Bala

nce

Lim

iting

the

Nat

iona

l Lab

or R

elat

ions

Boa

rd

Bala

nced

Bud

get A

men

dmen

t

Imm

edia

te C

uts t

o Cr

itica

l Gov

ernm

ent P

rogr

ams

California

1 Thompson, M. (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 98 7 93%

2 Herger (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 9 230 4%

3 Lungren (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 5 93 5%

4 McClintock (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 24 0%

5 Matsui (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 55 0 100%

6 Woolsey (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 162 2 99%

7 Miller, George (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 317 11 97%

8 Pelosi (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 218 2 99%

9 Lee, B. (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 111 1 99%

10 Garamendi (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 17 0 100%

11 McNerney (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 88% 40 2 95%

12 Speier (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 27 0 100%

13 Stark (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 326 8 98%

14 Eshoo (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 158 8 95%

15 Honda (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 90 0 100%

16 Lofgren (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 142 6 96%

17 Farr (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 158 3 98%

18 Cardoza (D) 4 4 4 4 4 8 4 100% 67 4 94%

19 Denham (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 7 0%

20 Costa (D) 4 4 4 4 4 8 4 86% 53 3 95%

21 Nunes (R) 8 8 8 8 8 ? 8 0% 2 70 3%

22 McCarthy, K. (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 2 40 5%

23 Capps (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 109 5 96%











Repe

alin

g H

ealth

Car

e Re

form

Lim

iting

Wor

kers

’ Rig

ht to

Form

a U

nion

The

Ryan

Bud

get

Cut,

Cap

and

Bala

nce

Lim

iting

the

Nat

iona

l Lab

or R

elat

ions

Boa

rd

Bala

nced

Bud

get A

men

dmen

t

Imm

edia

te C

uts t

o Cr

itica

l Gov

ernm

ent P

rogr

ams

California

24 Gallegly (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 19 218 8%

25 McKeon (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 4 163 2%

26 Dreier (R) 8 8 8 8 8 4 ? 17% 10 279 3%

27 Sherman (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 118 3 98%

28 Berman (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 254 9 97%

29 Schiff (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 89 3 97%

30 Waxman (D) 4 4 4 4 ? 4 4 100% 321 11 97%

31 Becerra (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 152 2 99%

32 Chu (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 18 0 100%

33 Bass, K. (D) 4 4 4 4 4 ? 4 100% 6 0 100%

34 Roybal-Allard (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 336 12 97%

35 Waters (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 181 3 98%

36 Hahn (D) N/A N/A N/A 4 4 4 4 100% 181 3 98%

36 Harman (D) 4 ? N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 100% 77 5 94%

37 Richardson (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 26 0 100%

38 Napolitano (D) 4 4 4 4 4 ? 4 100% 95 0 100%

39 Sánchez, Linda (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 65 0 100%

40 Royce (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 4 153 3%

41 Lewis, Jerry (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 36 241 13%

42 Miller, Gary (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 2 85 2%

43 Baca (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 87 1 99%

44 Calvert (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 5 150 3%

45 Bono Mack, M. (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 13% 11 93 11%







Repe

alin

g H

ealth

Car

e Re

form

Lim

iting

Wor

kers

’ Rig

ht to

Form

a U

nion

The

Ryan

Bud

get

Cut,

Cap

and

Bala

nce

Lim

iting

the

Nat

iona

l Lab

or R

elat

ions

Boa

rd

Bala

nced

Bud

get A

men

dmen

t

Imm

edia

te C

uts t

o Cr

itica

l Gov

ernm

ent P

rogr

ams

California

46 Rohrabacher (R) 8 8 8 4 8 8 8 14% 10 212 5%

47 Sanchez, Loretta (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 115 6 95%

48 Campbell (R) 8 4 8 8 8 8 8 0% 2 48 4%

49 Issa (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 2 89 2%

50 Bilbray (R) 8 4 8 8 8 8 8 13% 6 41 13%

51 Filner (D) 4 4 4 4 4 ? 4 100% 159 1 99%

52 Hunter (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 20 264 7%

53 Davis, S. (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 81 1 99%

Colorado

1 DeGette (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 115 1 99%

2 Polis (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 23 1 96%

3 Tipton (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 7 0%

4 Gardner (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 7 0%

5 Lamborn (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 42 0%

6 Coffman (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 1 23 4%

7 Perlmutter (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 41 1 98%

Connecticut

1 Larson, J. (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 103 1 99%

2 Courtney (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 40 1 98%

3 DeLauro (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 197 4 98%

4 Himes (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 23 1 96%

5 Murphy, C. (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 41 1 98%

Delaware

AL Carney (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 7 0 100%











Repe

alin

g H

ealth

Car

e Re

form

Lim

iting

Wor

kers

’ Rig

ht to

Form

a U

nion

The

Ryan

Bud

get

Cut,

Cap

and

Bala

nce

Lim

iting

the

Nat

iona

l Lab

or R

elat

ions

Boa

rd

Bala

nced

Bud

get A

men

dmen

t

Imm

edia

te C

uts t

o Cr

itica

l Gov

ernm

ent P

rogr

ams

Florida

1 Miller, J. (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 3 82 4%

2 Southerland (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 7 0%

3 Brown, C. (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 163 0 100%

4 Crenshaw (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 6 86 7%

5 Nugent (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 7 0%

6 Stearns (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 18 202 8%

7 Mica (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 8 158 5%

8 Webster (R) 8 8 8 8 ? 8 8 0% 0 6 0%

9 Bilirakis, G. (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 42 227 16%

10 Young, C.W. (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 41 217 16%

11 Castor (D) 4 4 4 ? 4 4 4 100% 41 0 100%

12 Ross, D. (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 7 0%

13 Buchanan (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 9 32 22%

14 Mack (R) 8 8 8 4 8 8 ? 17% 1 55 2%

15 Posey (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 7 0%

16 Rooney (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 2 21 9%

17 Wilson F. (D) 4 ? 4 4 4 4 4 100% 6 0 100%

18 Ros-Lehtinen (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 59 153 28%

19 Deutch (D) 4 4 4 4 4 ? 4 100% 13 0 100%

20 Wasserman Schultz (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 ? 100% 56 0 100%

21 Diaz-Balart (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 43 121 26%

22 West, A. (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 7 0%

23 Hastings, A. (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 156 1 99%







Repe

alin

g H

ealth

Car

e Re

form

Lim

iting

Wor

kers

’ Rig

ht to

Form

a U

nion

The

Ryan

Bud

get

Cut,

Cap

and

Bala

nce

Lim

iting

the

Nat

iona

l Lab

or R

elat

ions

Boa

rd

Bala

nced

Bud

get A

men

dmen

t

Imm

edia

te C

uts t

o Cr

itica

l Gov

ernm

ent P

rogr

ams

Florida

24 Adams (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 7 0%

25 Rivera (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 7 0%

Georgia

1 Kingston (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 5 161 3%

2 Bishop, S. (D) 4 4 4 4 4 8 4 86% 144 20 88%

3 Westmoreland (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 57 0%

4 Johnson, H. (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 42 0 100%

5 Lewis, John (D) 4 4 4 4 ? 4 4 100% 228 5 98%

6 Price, T. (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 57 0%

7 Woodall (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 7 0%

8 Scott, A. (D) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 7 0%

9 Graves, T. (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 14 0%

10 Broun (R) 8 8 8 4 8 8 8 14% 1 33 3%

11 Gingrey (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 1 71 1%

12 Barrow (D) 4 4 4 4 8 8 8 57% 42 15 74%

13 Scott, D. (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 69 3 96%

Hawaii

1 Hanabusa (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 7 0 100%

2 Hirono (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 42 0 100%

Idaho

1 Labrador (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 7 0%

2 Simpson (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 11 91 11%











Repe

alin

g H

ealth

Car

e Re

form

Lim

iting

Wor

kers

’ Rig

ht to

Form

a U

nion

The

Ryan

Bud

get

Cut,

Cap

and

Bala

nce

Lim

iting

the

Nat

iona

l Lab

or R

elat

ions

Boa

rd

Bala

nced

Bud

get A

men

dmen

t

Imm

edia

te C

uts t

o Cr

itica

l Gov

ernm

ent P

rogr

ams

Illinois

1 Rush (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 158 0 100%

2 Jackson, J. (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 134 0 100%

3 Lipinski (D) 4 4 4 4 4 8 4 86% 54 2 96%

4 Gutierrez (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 ? 100% 157 1 99%

5 Quigley (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 19 1 95%

6 Roskam (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 3 38 7%

7 Davis, D. (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 120 1 99%

8 Walsh (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 7 0%

9 Schakowsky (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 105 0 100%

10 Dold (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 7 0%

11 Kinzinger (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 7 0%

12 Costello (D) 4 4 4 4 4 8 4 86% 199 24 89%

13 Biggert (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 8 97 8%

14 Hultgren (D) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 7 0%

15 Johnson, Timothy (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 4 14% 29 63 32%

16 Manzullo (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 7 160 4%

17 Schilling (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 7 0%

18 Schock (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 2 22 8%

19 Shimkus (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 15 105 13%

Indiana

1 Visclosky (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 235 22 91%

2 Donnelly (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 8 4 86% 37 5 88%







Repe

alin

g H

ealth

Car

e Re

form

Lim

iting

Wor

kers

’ Rig

ht to

Form

a U

nion

The

Ryan

Bud

get

Cut,

Cap

and

Bala

nce

Lim

iting

the

Nat

iona

l Lab

or R

elat

ions

Boa

rd

Bala

nced

Bud

get A

men

dmen

t

Imm

edia

te C

uts t

o Cr

itica

l Gov

ernm

ent P

rogr

ams

Indiana

3 Stutzman (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 1 9 10%

4 Rokita (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 7 0%

5 Burton (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 15 249 6%

6 Pence (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 7 0%

7 Carson (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 9 83 10%

8 Bucshon (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 7 0%

9 Young, T. (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 7 0%

Iowa

1 Braley, B. (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 33 2 94%

2 Loebsack (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 33 0 100%

3 Boswell (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 100 12 89%

4 Latham (R) 8 8 8 8 8 4 8 13% 11 130 8%

5 King, S. (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 65 0%

Kansas

1 Huelskamp (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 7 0%

2 Jenkins (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 24 0%

3 Yoder (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 7 0%

4 Pompeo (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 7 0%

Kentucky

1 Whitfield (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 18 128 12%

2 Guthrie (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 2 22 8%

3 Yarmuth (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 42 0 100%

4 Davis, G. (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 6 51 11%











Repe

alin

g H

ealth

Car

e Re

form

Lim

iting

Wor

kers

’ Rig

ht to

Form

a U

nion

The

Ryan

Bud

get

Cut,

Cap

and

Bala

nce

Lim

iting

the

Nat

iona

l Lab

or R

elat

ions

Boa

rd

Bala

nced

Bud

get A

men

dmen

t

Imm

edia

te C

uts t

o Cr

itica

l Gov

ernm

ent P

rogr

ams

Kentucky

5 Rogers, H. (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 37 250 13%

6 Chandler (D) 4 4 4 4 4 8 4 86% 55 8 87%

Louisiana

1 Scalise (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 1 26 4%

2 Richmond (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 7 0 100%

3 Landry, J. (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 7 0%

4 Fleming (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 1 23 4%

5 Alexander, R. (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 17 52 25%

6 Cassidy (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 2 22 8%

7 Boustany (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 4 51 7%

Maine

1 Pingree (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 24 0 100%

2 Michaud (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 72 1 99%

Maryland

1 Harris (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 7 0%

2 Ruppersberger (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 69 2 97%

3 Sarbanes (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 42 0 100%

4 Edwards, D. (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 27 0 100%

5 Hoyer (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 275 14 95%

6 Bartlett (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 10 156 6%

7 Cummings (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 129 1 99%

8 Van Hollen (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 73 0 100%







Repe

alin

g H

ealth

Car

e Re

form

Lim

iting

Wor

kers

’ Rig

ht to

Form

a U

nion

The

Ryan

Bud

get

Cut,

Cap

and

Bala

nce

Lim

iting

the

Nat

iona

l Lab

or R

elat

ions

Boa

rd

Bala

nced

Bud

get A

men

dmen

t

Imm

edia

te C

uts t

o Cr

itica

l Gov

ernm

ent P

rogr

ams

Massachusetts

1 Olver (D) 4 4 8 4 4 8 4 100% 191 3 98%

2 Neal (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 212 9 96%

3 McGovern (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 122 0 100%

4 Frank, B. (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 282 8 97%

5 Tsongas (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 31 0 100%

6 Tierney (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 120 1 99%

7 Markey, E. (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 315 10 97%

8 Capuano (D) 4 4 4 8 8 4 4 100% 101 0 100%

9 Lynch (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 83 0 100%

10 Keating (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 7 0 100%

Michigan

1 Benishek (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 7 0%

2 Huizenga (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 7 0%

3 Amash (R) 8 8 8 8 8 4 8 14% 1 6 14%

4 Camp (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 14 187 7%

5 Kildee (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 147 19 89%

6 Upton (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 49 191 20%

7 Walberg (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 7 0%

8 Rogers, Mike (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 9 82 10%

9 Peters (D) 4 ? 4 4 4 4 4 100% 22 1 96%

10 Miller, C. (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 15 58 21%

11 McCotter (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 15 58 21%

12 Levin, S. (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 261 10 96%











Repe

alin

g H

ealth

Car

e Re

form

Lim

iting

Wor

kers

’ Rig

ht to

Form

a U

nion

The

Ryan

Bud

get

Cut,

Cap

and

Bala

nce

Lim

iting

the

Nat

iona

l Lab

or R

elat

ions

Boa

rd

Bala

nced

Bud

get A

men

dmen

t

Imm

edia

te C

uts t

o Cr

itica

l Gov

ernm

ent P

rogr

ams

Michigan

13 Clarke (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 7 0 100%

14 Conyers (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 317 8 98%

15 Dingell (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 334 20 94%

Minnesota

1 Walz (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 42 0 100%

2 Kline, J. (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 2 71 3%

3 Paulsen, E. (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 2 22 8%

4 McCollum (D) 4 ? 4 4 4 4 4 100% 91 0 100%

5 Ellison (D) 4 4 4 ? 4 4 4 100% 41 0 100%

6 Bachmann (R) 8 8 8 4 ? 8 ? 20% 3 35 8%

7 Peterson (D) 4 4 4 4 4 8 4 86% 143 59 71%

8 Cravaack (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 7 0%

Mississippi

1 Nunnelee (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 7 0%

2 Thompson, B. (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 159 2 99%

3 Harper (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 1 22 4%

4 Palazzo (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 7 0%

Missouri

1 Clay (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 8 3 97%

2 Akin (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 1 91 1%

3 Carnahan (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 57 0 100%

4 Hartzler (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 7 0%

5 Cleaver (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 55 0 100%







Repe

alin

g H

ealth

Car

e Re

form

Lim

iting

Wor

kers

’ Rig

ht to

Form

a U

nion

The

Ryan

Bud

get

Cut,

Cap

and

Bala

nce

Lim

iting

the

Nat

iona

l Lab

or R

elat

ions

Boa

rd

Bala

nced

Bud

get A

men

dmen

t

Imm

edia

te C

uts t

o Cr

itica

l Gov

ernm

ent P

rogr

ams

Missouri

6 Graves, S. (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 6 85 7%

7 Long (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 7 0%

8 Emerson (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 25 84 23%

9 Luetkemeyer (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 2 22 8%

Montana

AL Rehberg (R) 8 8 4 8 8 8 8 14% 9 83 10%

Nebraska

1 Fortenberry (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 6 51 11%

2 Terry (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 4 101 4%

3 Smith, Adrian (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 42 0%

Nevada

1 Berkley (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 98 3 97%

2 Amodei (R) N/A N/A N/A N/A 8 8 8 0% 0 3 0%

3 Heck (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 7 0%

New Hampshire

1 Guinta (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 7 0%

2 Bass, C. (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 7 0%

New Jersey

1 Andrews (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 176 25 88%

2 LoBiondo (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 4 14% 52 96 35%

3 Runyan (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 4 14% 1 6 14%

4 Smith, C. (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 4 14% 132 158 46%

5 Garrett (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 2 71 3%











Repe

alin

g H

ealth

Car

e Re

form

Lim

iting

Wor

kers

’ Rig

ht to

Form

a U

nion

The

Ryan

Bud

get

Cut,

Cap

and

Bala

nce

Lim

iting

the

Nat

iona

l Lab

or R

elat

ions

Boa

rd

Bala

nced

Bud

get A

men

dmen

t

Imm

edia

te C

uts t

o Cr

itica

l Gov

ernm

ent P

rogr

ams

New Jersey

6 Pallone (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 200 22 90%

7 Lance (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 6 18 25%

8 Pascrell (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 117 3 98%

9 Rothman (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 117 3 98%

10 Payne (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 207 2 99%

11 Frelinghuysen (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 13 134 9%

12 Holt (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 102 3 97%

13 Sires (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 41 0 100%

New Mexico

1 Heinrich (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 24 0 100%

2 Pearce (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 13 11 54%

3 Luján (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 24 0 100%

New York

1 Bishop, T. (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 73 0 100%

2 Israel (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 87 4 96%

3 King, P. (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 4 14% 41 123 25%

4 McCarthy, C. (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 113 7 94%

5 Ackerman (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 247 9 96%

6 Meeks, G. (D) 4 4 ? 4 4 4 4 100% 109 1 99%

7 Crowley (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 105 0 100%

8 Nadler (D) 4 4 4 4 ? 4 4 100% 163 1 99%

9 Turner, B. (D) N/A N/A N/A N/A 8 8 8 0% 0 3 %

9 Weiner (D) 4 4 4 N/A N/A N/A N/A 100% 100 1 99%

10 Towns (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 245 3 99%







Repe

alin

g H

ealth

Car

e Re

form

Lim

iting

Wor

kers

’ Rig

ht to

Form

a U

nion

The

Ryan

Bud

get

Cut,

Cap

and

Bala

nce

Lim

iting

the

Nat

iona

l Lab

or R

elat

ions

Boa

rd

Bala

nced

Bud

get A

men

dmen

t

Imm

edia

te C

uts t

o Cr

itica

l Gov

ernm

ent P

rogr

ams

New York

11 Clarke (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 33 0 100%

12 Velázquez (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 156 2 99%

13 Grimm (R) 8 8 8 8 4 8 4 75% 14 3 82%

14 Maloney (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 156 3 98%

15 Rangel (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 333 9 97%

16 Serrano (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 197 3 99%

17 Engel (D) 4 4 4 ? 4 4 4 100% 211 1 100%

18 Lowey (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 210 6 97%

19 Hayworth (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 100% 35 0 100%

20 Gibson (R) 8 8 8 8 4 8 8 100% 11 1 92%

21 Tonko (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 17 0 100%

22 Hinchey (D) 4 4 4 ? 4 4 4 100% 159 0 100%

23 Owens (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 88% 9 1 90%

24 Hanna (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 88% 33 2 94%

25 Buerkle (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 100% 16 0 100%

26 Hochul (D) N/A N/A N/A 4 4 8 4 0% 3 14 18%

26 Lee, C. (R) 8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 0% 3 14 18%

27 Higgins (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 50 0 100%

28 Slaughter (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 222 7 97%

29 Reed, T. (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 2 0%

North Carolina

1 Butterfield (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 58 0 100%

2 Ellmers (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 7 0%

3 Jones (R) 8 4 4 4 8 8 8 43% 36 106 25%











Repe

alin

g H

ealth

Car

e Re

form

Lim

iting

Wor

kers

’ Rig

ht to

Form

a U

nion

The

Ryan

Bud

get

Cut,

Cap

and

Bala

nce

Lim

iting

the

Nat

iona

l Lab

or R

elat

ions

Boa

rd

Bala

nced

Bud

get A

men

dmen

t

Imm

edia

te C

uts t

o Cr

itica

l Gov

ernm

ent P

rogr

ams

North Carolina

4 Price, D. (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 117 5 96%

5 Foxx (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 57 0%

6 Coble (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 17 230 7%

7 McIntyre (D) 8 4 4 8 8 8 8 29% 87 34 72%

8 Kissell (D) 4 4 4 4 4 8 4 86% 21 3 88%

9 Myrick (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 5 142 4%

10 McHenry (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 2 55 4%

11 Shuler (D) 4 4 4 8 8 8 4 57% 32 10 76%

12 Watt (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 163 3 98%

13 Miller, B. (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 72 1 99%

North Dakota

AL Berg (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 7 0%

Ohio

1 Chabot (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 7 0%

2 Schmidt (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 5 49 9%

3 Turner (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 12 60 17%

4 Jordan (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 42 0%

5 Latta (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 1 30 3%

6 Johnson B. (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 7 0%

7 Austria (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 3 21 13%

8 Boehner (R) 8 ? ? ? ? 8 ? 0% 3 191 2%

9 Kaptur (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 244 18 93%

10 Kucinich (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 114 4 97%







Repe

alin

g H

ealth

Car

e Re

form

Lim

iting

Wor

kers

’ Rig

ht to

Form

a U

nion

The

Ryan

Bud

get

Cut,

Cap

and

Bala

nce

Lim

iting

the

Nat

iona

l Lab

or R

elat

ions

Boa

rd

Bala

nced

Bud

get A

men

dmen

t

Imm

edia

te C

uts t

o Cr

itica

l Gov

ernm

ent P

rogr

ams

Ohio

11 Fudge (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 24 0 100%

12 Tiberi (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 7 84 8%

13 Sutton (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 40 0 100%

14 LaTourette (R) 8 8 8 8 4 8 4 29% 43 104 29%

15 Stivers (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 7 0%

16 Renacci (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 7 0%

17 Ryan, Tim (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 71 1 99%

18 Gibbs, B. (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 7 0%

Oklahoma

1 Sullivan (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 4 76 5%

2 Boren (D) 8 4 4 8 8 8 8 29% 31 24 56%

3 Lucas (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 4 142 3%

4 Cole (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 3 70 4%

5 Lankford (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 1 38 3%

Oregon

1 Wu (D) 4 4 4 4 N/A N/A N/A 100% 93 4 96%

2 Walden (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 11 86 11%

3 Blumenauer (D) 4 4 4 ? 4 4 4 100% 117 2 98%

4 DeFazio (D) 4 4 4 4 4 8 4 100% 211 17 93%

5 Schrader (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 15 2 88%

Pennsylvania

1 Brady, R. (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 109 1 99%

2 Fattah (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 144 2 99%











Repe

alin

g H

ealth

Car

e Re

form

Lim

iting

Wor

kers

’ Rig

ht to

Form

a U

nion

The

Ryan

Bud

get

Cut,

Cap

and

Bala

nce

Lim

iting

the

Nat

iona

l Lab

or R

elat

ions

Boa

rd

Bala

nced

Bud

get A

men

dmen

t

Imm

edia

te C

uts t

o Cr

itica

l Gov

ernm

ent P

rogr

ams

Pennsylvania

3 Kelly (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 7 0%

4 Altmire (D) 4 4 4 4 4 8 4 86% 38 4 90%

5 Thompson, G. (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 3 21 13%

6 Gerlach (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 20 52 28%

7 Meehan (R) 8 8 8 8 4 8 8 14% 1 6 14%

8 Fitzpatrick (R) 8 8 8 8 4 8 8 14% 1 6 14%

9 Shuster (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 6 82 7%

10 Marino (R) 8 8 8 8 ? 8 8 0% 0 6 0%

11 Barletta (R) 8 8 8 8 ? 8 8 0% 0 6 0%

12 Critz (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 13 1 93%

13 Schwartz (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 57 0 100%

14 Doyle (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 136 10 93%

15 Dent (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 15 42 26%

16 Pitts (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 2 118 2%

17 Holden (D) 4 4 4 4 4 8 4 86% 150 15 91%

18 Murphy, T. (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 21 52 29%

19 Platts (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 21 71 23%

Rhode Island

1 Cicilline (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 7 0 100%

2 Langevin (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 89 1 99%

South Carolina

1 Scott T. (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 7 0%

2 Wilson, J. (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 3 80 4%







Repe

alin

g H

ealth

Car

e Re

form

Lim

iting

Wor

kers

’ Rig

ht to

Form

a U

nion

The

Ryan

Bud

get

Cut,

Cap

and

Bala

nce

Lim

iting

the

Nat

iona

l Lab

or R

elat

ions

Boa

rd

Bala

nced

Bud

get A

men

dmen

t

Imm

edia

te C

uts t

o Cr

itica

l Gov

ernm

ent P

rogr

ams

South Carolina

3 Duncan (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 7 0%

4 Gowdy (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 7 0%

5 Mulvaney (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 7 0%

6 Clyburn (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 157 5 97%

South Dakota

AL Noem (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 7 0%

Tennessee

1 Roe (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 3 21 13%

2 Duncan (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 20 204 9%

3 Fleischmann (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 10 134 7%

4 DesJarlais (R) 8 8 8 4 8 8 8 14% 1 6 14%

5 Cooper (D) 4 4 4 8 8 8 8 43% 55 16 77%

6 Black D. (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 7 0%

7 Blackburn, M. (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 1 71 1%

8 Fincher (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 7 0%

9 Cohen (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 42 0 100%

Texas

1 Gohmert (R) 8 8 8 8 8 4 8 14% 3 52 5%

2 Poe (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 4 53 7%

3 Johnson, S. (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 4 187 2%

4 Hall, R. (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 55 231 19%

5 Hensarling (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 1 72 1%

6 Barton (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 12 232 5%











Repe

alin

g H

ealth

Car

e Re

form

Lim

iting

Wor

kers

’ Rig

ht to

Form

a U

nion

The

Ryan

Bud

get

Cut,

Cap

and

Bala

nce

Lim

iting

the

Nat

iona

l Lab

or R

elat

ions

Boa

rd

Bala

nced

Bud

get A

men

dmen

t

Imm

edia

te C

uts t

o Cr

itica

l Gov

ernm

ent P

rogr

ams

Texas

7 Culberson (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 3 87 3%

8 Brady, K. (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 1 120 1%

9 Green, A. (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 57 0 100%

10 McCaul (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 2 54 4%

11 Conaway (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 1 56 2%

12 Granger (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 3 115 3%

13 Thornberry (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 1 147 1%

14 Paul, Ron (R) 8 ? 4 4 8 ? ? 50% 36 76 32%

15 Hinojosa (D) 4 ? 4 4 4 4 4 100% 110 6 95%

16 Reyes (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 117 2 98%

17 Flores (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 7 0%

18 Jackson Lee (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 143 3 98%

19 Neugebauer (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 69 0%

20 Gonzalez (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 102 2 98%

21 Smith, Lamar (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 22 209 10%

22 Olson (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 24 0%

23 Canseco (R) 8 8 8 4 8 8 8 14% 1 6 14%

24 Marchant (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 1 53 2%

25 Doggett (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 137 6 96%

26 Burgess (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 2 70 3%

27 Farenthold (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 7 0%

28 Cuellar (D) 4 4 4 4 8 8 8 57% 48 9 84%

29 Green, G. (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 160 4 98%







Repe

alin

g H

ealth

Car

e Re

form

Lim

iting

Wor

kers

’ Rig

ht to

Form

a U

nion

The

Ryan

Bud

get

Cut,

Cap

and

Bala

nce

Lim

iting

the

Nat

iona

l Lab

or R

elat

ions

Boa

rd

Bala

nced

Bud

get A

men

dmen

t

Imm

edia

te C

uts t

o Cr

itica

l Gov

ernm

ent P

rogr

ams

Texas

30 Johnson, E. (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 158 6 96%

31 Carter (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 71 0%

32 Sessions, P. (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 1 119 1%

Utah

1 Bishop, R. (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 3 67 4%

2 Matheson (D) 4 4 4 8 8 8 8 8 43% 65 27 71%

3 Chaffetz (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 1 23 4%

Vermont

AL Welch (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 40 2 95%

Virginia

1 Wittman (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 5 26 16%

2 Rigell (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 7 0%

3 Scott, R. (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 165 2 99%

4 Forbes (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 6 81 7%

5 Hurt (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 7 0%

6 Goodlatte (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 8 159 5%

7 Cantor (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 1 91 1%

8 Moran, James (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 175 27 87%

9 Griffith (R) 8 8 8 4 8 8 8 14% 1 6 14%

10 Wolf (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 41 250 14%

11 Connolly (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 22 2 92%

Washington

1 Inslee (D) 4 4 4 4 4 8 4 86% 99 5 95%











Repe

alin

g H

ealth

Car

e Re

form

Lim

iting

Wor

kers

’ Rig

ht to

Form

a U

nion

The

Ryan

Bud

get

Cut,

Cap

and

Bala

nce

Lim

iting

the

Nat

iona

l Lab

or R

elat

ions

Boa

rd

Bala

nced

Bud

get A

men

dmen

t

Imm

edia

te C

uts t

o Cr

itica

l Gov

ernm

ent P

rogr

ams

Washington

2 Larsen, R. (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 86 4 96%

3 Herrera Beutler (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 7 0%

4 Hastings, D. (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 2 140 1%

5 McMorris Rodgers (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 4 50 7%

6 Dicks (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 288 33 90%

7 McDermott (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 209 6 97%

8 Reichert (R) 8 8 ? 8 8 8 8 0% 14 42 25%

9 Smith, Adam (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 106 9 92%

West Virginia

1 Mckinley (R) 8 8 4 8 4 8 8 29% 2 5 29%

2 Capito (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 22 68 24%

3 Rahall (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 288 28 91%

Wisconsin

1 Ryan, Paul (R) 8 8 8 8 8 4 8 14% 4 101 4%

2 Baldwin (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 ? 100% 103 0 100%

3 Kind (D) 4 4 4 4 4 8 4 86% 114 7 94%

4 Moore (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 56 1 98%

5 Sensenbrenner (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 22 281 7%

6 Petri (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 47 257 15%

7 Duffy (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 7 0%

8 Ribble (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 7 0%

Wyoming

AL Lummis (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 24 0%

112th congress first session • 2011

Documents