11 - team progress - aat
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/31/2019 11 - Team Progress - AAT
1/16
UCL Institute of Archaeology
2012
Who Stole my Milk?3.2 Audience Advocate Team
Jeni Turner & Binlu Wang
-
7/31/2019 11 - Team Progress - AAT
2/16
UCL Student Homes Project 2012 Page 406
TABLE OF CONTENT
3.2 Audience Advocate Team 405
Appendix 3.2.1 Meeting Minutes 9 February 2012 407
Appendix 3.2.2 Second Front-end Evaluation Questionnaire Draft 409
Appendix 3.2.3 Exhibition and Web Resource Design Questionnaire Draft 414Appendix 3.2.4 Evaluations Progress Summaries 420
-
7/31/2019 11 - Team Progress - AAT
3/16
UCL Student Homes Project 2012 Page 407
APPENDIX 3.2.1 MEETING MINUTES 9 FEBRUARY 2012
Meeting Title Formative Evaluation Meeting Date 09.02.2012
Facilitator Jo Fells Time 15: 00
Location GMNote
TakerBinlu Wang
Attendees Jo Fells (GM) Binlu Wang, Jeni Turner and Elisabetta P
KEY POINTS DISCUSSED
1. Summarised the 2nd survey about Title and theme. We did the survey both online andface to face and received 115 responses within 1 week. More open questions are
included in this survey compared with the last one. As Jo suggested, we are using
quantitative research techniques for a qualitative purpose, 115 is not a big number
though it is enough to give directions and show peoples view.
Discussed the methodology we recognize that online survey is going to create a level
of bias, but we think it is still useful because people who answer it get a chance to self-
select.
Discussed ways to analyze open questions and problems in this questionnaire for
example, in the question Do you live in a student home?, we dont know whether
those who choose No are students or not.
Jo provided suggestions for surveys testing postcard and report writing.
2. Future plan was made clear. AA calendar (time line) was checked by Jo/got feed backfrom Jo.
Short-term: urgent data out of the 2nd survey for other groups, short presentation abouttitle on 10th Fri, short presentation on the 2nd panel meeting, 2nd brief.
Long-term: 3rd survey testing web materials in early March, 4th survey about objects and
texts in late March and 5th survey during family days in April.
-
7/31/2019 11 - Team Progress - AAT
4/16
UCL Student Homes Project 2012 Page 408
ACTIONS PLAN
No Action Item(s) Assigned
Project
Member/s
Target
Date
1. Urgent data to be provided to different groups BW and JT Fri 10th
2. Short presentation about title to be prepared BW and JT Fri 10th
3. Presentation summarizing 2nd survey data to be
prepared for the 2nd panel meeting
BW and JT Mon 20th
4. 2nd brief BW and JT Mon 20th
NEXT MEETING
tbc
-
7/31/2019 11 - Team Progress - AAT
5/16
UCL Student Homes Project 2012 Page 409
APPENDIX 3.2.2 SECOND FRONT-END EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE DRAFT
AAT created an online survey at the beginning of February to test the audiences
perceptions of the two themes chosen by project team members and to ask the audience
which exhibition style/medium they preferred. This survey was also used to ask the
audience to rank three out of six possible titles for the project. The titles had been chosenafter a class brainstorm.
AAT created a draft of the survey, which was then passed onto their GM counterpart for
formatting and refinement. Their GM counterpart added tick boxes, comment lines and
standardised the survey. The survey was then posted on SurveyMonkey
(http://www.surveymonkey.com/) and copies were printed for face to face evaluation. The
survey was sent out to all the team members contacts that fit into the primary target
audience to obtain results. AAT compiled the data with the help of SurveyMonkey and
presented it to the class in PowerPoint form on February 10th, 2012. The title analysis was
then passed on PMT to refine and present to the GM.
Exhibition Survey Questionnaire (UCL 2011)
The Geffrye museum in conjunction with a team of post-graduate students from
UCL is putting on an exhibition this spring. We are researching possible titles for
an exhibition about student living and student homes.
1. Looking at the six titles below, in the context of student living and student
homes which three titles interest you the most?
Please rank them from number 1-3 (1 stands for the one that interests you most).
A. Fusion & Confusion
B. Student Living: Just Passing through
C. Who Stole My Milk?
D.Your Mother Doesnt Live Here
E. Funny, Messy, Whiskey
F. Uni! No Parents
2. Looking at your three preferred titles, what do you think they say
about student living and student homes (Please feel free to write down anything
that comes to mind when you see the title!)
http://www.surveymonkey.com/http://www.surveymonkey.com/http://www.surveymonkey.com/http://www.surveymonkey.com/ -
7/31/2019 11 - Team Progress - AAT
6/16
UCL Student Homes Project 2012 Page 410
i). Title here (please fill in the letter) : [___]
Comment here.
ii). Title here (please fill in the letter) : [___]
Comment here
iii). Title here (please fill in the letter) : [___]
Comment here.
3. Looking at the title that you ranked as mostinteresting, would this title inspire
you to find out more about the exhibition and come to see it at the museum?
(circle)
YES NO
If the answer is no, why is this? ..........................................................................
..
The exhibition is about student homes and we are considering a
number of themes.
I. Food and KitchensThinking about the kitchen and food in a student home
4. Would you consider kitchen equipment in student homes to be personal or shared
objects (circle)
PERSONAL SHARED
5. If you had to describe the role/significance of the kitchen in the STUDENT home in
THREE words what would they be?
..
6. Do you think a students kitchen equipment can represent their cultural background?
(circle)
-
7/31/2019 11 - Team Progress - AAT
7/16
UCL Student Homes Project 2012 Page 411
YES Comment. NO
II. Personal objects
7.In that context (if any) have you heard the term personal object ofmeaning
before? (circle and add a note about in what context)
HEARD In what context?...........................................................NOT HEARD
What do you think personal object of meaning means?................................
.
8. Do you think personal objects represent/symbolize your identity? (circle)
YES Comment.. NO
9. Do you think personal objects have more, less or equal importance in studenthomes than in family homes? (circle)
MORE LESS EQUAL
Why?
10. Which of the themes below interests you the most in the context of student
homes? (circle)
FOOD & KITCHENS PERSONAL OBJECTS BOTH
III. MediaWe are planning to publicise our exhibition through a variety of traditional and
new media.
11. Which social media sites do you use the most? (Rank the ones you use, with
1 most used )
1. Facebook
2. Twitter
3. Linked- In
4. Google+
5. Other
-
7/31/2019 11 - Team Progress - AAT
8/16
UCL Student Homes Project 2012 Page 412
IV. Content12. If you visited the student homes exhibition what would you like it to include?
Please choose the THREE mediums you prefer from the following list. (tick)
1 Photos of student rooms/their objects/themselves
2 Displays of personal objects
3 Audio or talking heads
4 Music
5 Activities such as cooking, tasting, making things,
6 Video7 Text8 Mock-ups/models / representations
9 Other
V. Museum Visiting13. The Geffrye museum is a museum of the home. Do you find this an
attractive theme for a museum? (circle and explain why you think this)
YES Comment
NO Comment
14. Are you a regular visitor to museums? (circle)
NO
YES How often do you visit a museum or gallery?
Once or more timesa month
Five or more times a year
About once a year
Havent been to a museum in over 12 months
Never go to museums
15. Which museums have you visited in the last year?
-
7/31/2019 11 - Team Progress - AAT
9/16
UCL Student Homes Project 2012 Page 413
VI. Demographics
16. Where do you live? (circle)
Greater London Southeast Other part of UK Overseas
17. Do you live in a student home? (or hall) YES NO
18. How old are you? (circle)
16-25 26-35 36-55 56-65 65+
19. Gender (circle)
Male Female Prefer not to record
Interview carried out
20. Face to face
21 Email Thanks for your time!
-
7/31/2019 11 - Team Progress - AAT
10/16
UCL Student Homes Project 2012 Page 414
APPENDIX 3.2.3 EXHIBITION & WEB RESOURCE DESIGN QUESTIONNAIRE DRAFT
AAT tested the exhibition and web resource elements of the project in a more focused
manner than the other evaluations. Exhibition text, images and layout were tested with the
Geffrye Youth Panel on March 12th, 2012. AAT was seeking more qualitative answers than a
simple survey could provide, and they initiated discussion of, for example, which videoformat was preferred for WRTs digital story.
The same questions asked at the Geffrye Youth Panel were then formatted into a survey by
AATs GM counterpart and launched online on March 17th. Results were collated starting
March 21stand distributed to the relevant teams on March 24th. The online survey process
was helped by all team members who sent the survey out to their contacts.
Evaluation Questions for the Two Exhibition Designs
(Notes for AAT team :
Questions for the online survey.
Questions 1 -4 contain the information we would most like to gain from the youth panel
focus group. Also, if there is time on Monday, question 6 on whether they think both
designs could be included would also be helpful. )
1. Which design do you prefer for the panels of the exhibition?
Design A Design B
2. Do you prefer this design because it is:a) More fun
b) More eye-catching
c) Makes the information clearer
d) Easier to read
e) Other Please specify
(NB: qu 3 and 4 for the youth panel only?)
3. Which design do you think will appeal most to the target audience (16-25 year
olds)
Design A Design B
4. Have you picked this design for the target audience because it is:
-
7/31/2019 11 - Team Progress - AAT
11/16
UCL Student Homes Project 2012 Page 415
a) More fun
b) More eye-catching
c) Makes the information clearer
d) Easier to read
e) Other Please specify
5. Which design(s) do you think fits best with the subject of the exhibition Student
Homes?
Design A Design B Both
6. Do you think both designs could be included as a combination within the same
exhibition?
Yes No
7. If no is this because
a) You do not like both designs
b) You feel including 2 designs could be visually confusing
c) Other please specify
.
SECOND SET OF QUESTIONS
1- Do you think the pictures shown below fit well with the subject of the exhibition
exploring student homes?
A- YES
B- NO
2- Do you think the pictures shown below support the story/message that is
presented in each caption?
A-YES
B-NO
1. Theme of Temporariness and decoration
-
7/31/2019 11 - Team Progress - AAT
12/16
UCL Student Homes Project 2012 Page 416
2. Combining cultures in the kitchen
. The kitchen at Tower Hamlets contains a wide variety ofcooking ingredients from all over the world, including a whole
row of seasoning and sauces on the right hand shelf.
The fridge is decorated with postcards and posters from
events the flatmates have been to together.
The row of plant pots on the kitchen windowsill of the
Islington flat attempt to bring a feeling of home into this
temporary accommodation.
-
7/31/2019 11 - Team Progress - AAT
13/16
UCL Student Homes Project 2012 Page 417
3. Potential conflict in student kitchens
The inside of the fridge at Tower Hamlets is typical of fridges in many
student homes.
Each flatmate has their own shelf, and there is little spare room.
Ted also likes to buy a large carton of extra-skimmed milk which can be
seen in the door.
None of the other flatmates use this milk, and have to fit in their own milk
alongside.
-
7/31/2019 11 - Team Progress - AAT
14/16
UCL Student Homes Project 2012 Page 418
THIRD SET OF QUESTIONS
Youth panel:
Floor plan styles:
1. 3D or 2D floor plan? Which do you prefer? Why? Do you find 3D plan confusing?
-
7/31/2019 11 - Team Progress - AAT
15/16
UCL Student Homes Project 2012 Page 419
2. Do you prefer new website to appear in pop-up or new window?
3. Should audio at webpage play simultaneously when the new page opens or should
people play the audio by pressing the play button on audio player?
Digital story
Pick the video you like the most. What did you like about the video(s)? What didn't you
like?
1. Pictures & narration
http://www.geffrye-museum.org.uk/learning/universities-fe-he/green-room-
project/digital-slideshow/
2. Pictures & text, no narration
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rrKNsPfGL9w&feature=related
3. Text, pictures & narration
http://www.geffrye-museum.org.uk/learning/universities-fe-he/the-world-at-
home/short-history-of-tea/
http://www.geffrye-museum.org.uk/learning/universities-fe-he/green-room-project/digital-slideshow/http://www.geffrye-museum.org.uk/learning/universities-fe-he/green-room-project/digital-slideshow/http://www.geffrye-museum.org.uk/learning/universities-fe-he/green-room-project/digital-slideshow/http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rrKNsPfGL9w&feature=relatedhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rrKNsPfGL9w&feature=relatedhttp://www.geffrye-museum.org.uk/learning/universities-fe-he/the-world-at-home/short-history-of-tea/http://www.geffrye-museum.org.uk/learning/universities-fe-he/the-world-at-home/short-history-of-tea/http://www.geffrye-museum.org.uk/learning/universities-fe-he/the-world-at-home/short-history-of-tea/http://www.geffrye-museum.org.uk/learning/universities-fe-he/the-world-at-home/short-history-of-tea/http://www.geffrye-museum.org.uk/learning/universities-fe-he/the-world-at-home/short-history-of-tea/http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rrKNsPfGL9w&feature=relatedhttp://www.geffrye-museum.org.uk/learning/universities-fe-he/green-room-project/digital-slideshow/http://www.geffrye-museum.org.uk/learning/universities-fe-he/green-room-project/digital-slideshow/ -
7/31/2019 11 - Team Progress - AAT
16/16
UCL Student Homes Project 2012 Page 420
APPENDIX 3.2.4 EVALUTIONS PROGRESS SUMMARIES
Social Media Evaluation
On February 28th, AAT met with ART and WRT to discuss how to carry out the social media
evaluation. The teams decided that AAT would evaluate social media in three ways, by
analysing the statistics of posts related to the project on Facebook and Twitter, by
considering visiting statistics on the blog and by posting a small five question survey on the
blog in order to evaluate its success and see how it could be improved: this was done with
SurveyMonkey. All these evaluations were carried our throughout a 1 month period
(March), with AAT taking statistics within five-day intervals. The results were collated at
the end of March.
AAT met with ART and WRT on April 4th to discuss the evaluation and make suggestion toWRT about how to improve the blog. The concrete suggestion that came out through the
evaluation was the alteration of the blog background as it was considered too confusingand hard to read. WRT proceeded to change the background from sepia to black and white
and making it a still image instead of a sliding one.
Family Days Evaluation
AAT met with LIT and their respective GM counterparts on March 27th to discuss Family
Days evaluation methods. AAT adapted the GMs standard Family Days Evaluation form,
which LIT and GM counterparts helped format. These forms were printed for the Family
Days and AAT ensured that most were completed at each Family Days session both on April3rd and 4th. They then collated the results and presented the responses at the final panel
meeting on April 20th
.
AAT also had informal chats with parents and Freelancers during the Family Days and took
notes on some of the comments made by them.