107 zayegh aupec01 paper revised

Upload: taner56

Post on 03-Apr-2018

218 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/28/2019 107 Zayegh AUPEC01 Paper Revised

    1/6

    VOLTAGE DIP CALCULATIONS USING SPREADSHEETS

    V. MIJATOVIC, R. COULTER*, A. ZAYEGH, A. KALAM

    School of Communications and Informatics

    Victoria University

    PO Box 14428 MC, Melbourne, 8001

    *Manager Technology Development, POWERCOR, Australia

    Abstract

    The analysis of voltage dips is an important technique in the determination of power quality. Thispaper deals with the use of spreadsheets to calculate voltage dips in a distribution network. It is shown

    that the graphs generated are essential tools in helping to understand the characteristics of voltage dips.

    1. INTRODUCTION

    Voltage dips are short-duration rms voltage caused by

    faults in the electricity supply system and the starting of

    large loads [1]. The interest in voltage dips is mainly

    due to the problems they cause on many types of

    equipment.

    Characteristics typically analyzed when discussing

    voltage dips are its magnitude and duration. However,

    during voltage dips, there is a phase shift associated with

    the drop in voltage, which is not included in the normal

    characteristics. This characteristic is based on a balanced

    voltage dip, whereas most voltage dips are a result of

    unbalanced faults occurring on the system. Both these

    factors play an important role in the disturbance of

    equipment operation [4].

    One of the most powerful tools for dealing with classical

    unbalanced systems is the theory of symmetricalcomponents. This theory allows us to analyze the system

    response when dealing with both symmetrical and

    unsymmetrical faults. In this paper, the theory of

    symmetrical components will be applied to voltage dips

    due to single line to ground fault (SLGF) and line to line

    fault (LLF).

    Using a simple radial high voltage distribution network

    at no load as the base model (Figure 1), phase voltage

    characteristics are derived for both faults. Using data

    provided with the base model and alternating thetransformer from delta-delta () to star-delta (Y), thephase voltage characteristics are then determined in

    terms of magnitude and angle. Comparing the phase

    voltage to the pre-fault phase voltages will give the

    voltage dip in terms of magnitude and phase change.

    Figure 1 Base model of a distribution network.

    2. UNBALANCED FAULTCHARACTERISTIC

    For simplified symmetrical component analysis it is

    assumed that the positive and negative sequence

    networks have the same impedance (Z1=Z2) [2].

    However for the purpose of determining phase voltages

    we shall initially label both the positive and negative

    impedances separately.

    The analytical equations for the three phase voltages are

    derived via the voltage matrix.

    =

    2

    1

    0

    2

    2

    1

    1

    111

    R

    R

    R

    B

    Y

    R

    V

    V

    V

    V

    V

    V

    (1)

    where = 1120 and 2 = 1240

  • 7/28/2019 107 Zayegh AUPEC01 Paper Revised

    2/6

    Therefore

    VR= VR0 + VR1 + VR2

    VY = VR0 + 2VR1 + VR2 (2)

    VB = VR0 + VR1 + 2VR2

    From the SLGF sequence network it can determined that

    VR0 = -IFZ0

    VR1 = ER1 - Z1IF (3)

    VR2 = -IFZ2

    where IF = ER1 / (Z1 + Z2 + Z0 + 3ZF)

    For the LLF the sequence network is

    VR0 = 0

    VR1 = IF (Z2 + ZF) (4)

    VR2 = IFZ2

    where IF = ER1 / (Z1 + Z2 + ZF)

    Thus the sequence voltages at the fault point F and bus

    R, for given networks, can be determined using theabove equations (2)(3) and (4). To determine the voltage

    at bus LD the transformer connections are taken into

    account.

    If the transformer is Y connected there is a phase shiftof +30 in the positive sequence and a shift of 30 inthe negative sequence [3]. There is no phase shift for the

    connected transformer. Also taken into account isthe change in the zero sequence network due to

    transformer connections.

    3. EXCEL SPREADSHEET FOR VOLTAGE DIP

    CALCULATIONS

    Using the relevant equations obtained from the previous

    section it is possible to calculate the voltage dip

    expected at varying fault points (0 20km) at bus LD

    for both SLGF and LLF using either transformer.

    Firstly it is known that pre-fault values of the phase

    voltages are equivalent to

    VRN = 1 30VYN = 1270VBN = 1150

    VRY = 160VYB = 1 -60

    VBR = 1180

    Subtracting the fault voltage from its relevant pre-fault

    voltage determines the voltage dip magnitude and angle.

    To calculate the voltage dip at various fault points

    requires changing the line impedance, due to the fact

    that as the line length increases so does the line

    impedance.

    The advantage of using spreadsheets is that the data can

    be graphed in order to show the behaviour of the voltage

    dip. In the next section plots are generated which show

    the trend in voltage magnitude vs. phase change, change

    in voltage magnitude vs. distance and phase change vs.distance. The line voltages at particular fault points are

    displayed as sinewave graphs so that comparison

    between pre-fault, fault and post-fault conditions can

    physically be seen. The advantage of this is that it is

    poss ible to see voltage dip effects.

    Using MATLAB tool Excel Link, the data in Excel can

    be used to represent, in MATLAB, the three pre-fault

    and fault voltages as vector diagrams for the fault points.

    4. RESULTS

    The following graphs are for both SLGF and LLF using

    either transformer, however due to these graphs being

    only examples we have only used the three line-ground

    voltages (VRN, VBN,VYN) as data. Please note that VRN is

    represented by a grey line, VBN by a light grey line and

    VYN by a black line.

    4.1 Magnitude change vs. phase change

    Figures 2 to 5 are useful in determining the phase

    change experienced in the line when the fault voltageincreases or decreases, and vice versa. It is also possible

    to see the difference that the transformer connections

    will make on the voltage dip.

    4.1.1 SLGF

    Figure 2 Magnitude change vs. phase change forconnection

  • 7/28/2019 107 Zayegh AUPEC01 Paper Revised

    3/6

    4.2 Magnitude vs. distance

    The graphs shown in this section help determine the

    voltage dip magnitude at certain distances. Thus, given

    the distance, it is possible to estimate what the voltage

    dip magnitude will be.

    4.2.1 SLGF

    Figure 3 Magnitude change vs. phase change for Yconnection. Note: VYN located origin.

    4.1.2 LLF

    Figure 4 Magnitude change vs. phase change forconnection. Note: VRN located at 0-30

    Figure 5 Magnitude change vs. phase change for Yconnection.

    Figure 6 Magnitude vs. distance for connection.

    Figure 7 Magnitude vs. distance for Y connection.

  • 7/28/2019 107 Zayegh AUPEC01 Paper Revised

    4/6

    4.2.2 LLF

    Figure 8 Magnitude vs. distance for connection.

    Figure 9 Magnitude vs. distance for Y connection.

    4.3 Phase vs. distance

    Figure 10 - 13 show what phase change the system will

    experience over a certain distance

    4.3.1 SLGF

    Figure 10 Phase vs. distance for connection.

    Figure 11 Phase vs. distance for Y connection.

    4.3.2 LLF

    Figure 12 Phase vs. distance for connection.

    Figure 13 Phase vs. distance for Y connection.

  • 7/28/2019 107 Zayegh AUPEC01 Paper Revised

    5/6

    4.4 Sinewave graphs

    The data used for the following graphs are taken at a

    fault distance of 0km. These graphs give a better

    understanding of the line voltage values at pre-fault,

    fault and post-fault conditions. Please note that transienteffects are not taken into account.

    4.4.1 SLGF

    Figure 14 connection, at observation point.

    Figure 15 Y connection, at observation point

    4.4.2 LLF

    Figure 16 connection, at observation point

    Figure 17 Y connection, at observation point

    4.5 Vector diagrams

    The vector diagrams visually clarify the change in

    magnitude and phase in comparison to its initial value.Please Note that the data used is once again for a fault

    distance of 0km.

    4.5.1 SLGF

    Figure 18 connection, at observation point

  • 7/28/2019 107 Zayegh AUPEC01 Paper Revised

    6/6

    Figure 19 Y connection, at observation point

    4.5.2 DLGF

    Figure 20 connection, at observation point

    Figure 21 Y connection, at observation point

    5. CONCLUSION

    As can be seen, by using a simple radial high voltage

    distribution network at no load as the base model, the

    phase voltage characteristics where derived for bothfaults using spreadsheets. Using the voltage dip data

    obtained from the spreadsheets it was graphically

    represented in order to give us a better understanding of

    its characteristics, especially noting its behaviour when

    the transformer connection was changed from to Y.

    The advantage of using spreadsheets is that the graphs

    generated help us to physically see the comparison

    between pre-fault and fault conditions as well as the

    difference between fault location points. Thus it helps us

    in determining the effects of voltage dips on the system.

    Another advantage of using spreadsheets, especially for

    students, is its ease of use and it is also relativelyaffordable and obtainable compared to other simulation

    packages.

    6. REFERENCES

    [1] L. Zhang, and M.H.J. Bollen, Characteristic in

    Voltage Dips (sags) in Power Systems,IEEE

    Trans. on Power Delivery, vol.2, pp 827-832, April

    2000.

    [2] H. Saadat,1999,Power System Analysis,

    WCB/McGraw-Hill.

    [3] J.J. Grainger, W.D. Stevenson, 1994,Power SystemAnalysis, McGraw-Hill.

    [4] M.H.J. Bollen, P. Wang, and N. Jenkins, Analysisand consequences of the phase angle associated

    with a voltage sag,IEEE Trans. on Power Systems

    Computation Conf., Dresden, Germany, Aug 1996.