102658958 hershey foods analysis

Upload: chatelle-bell

Post on 14-Oct-2015

43 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Case 1: Hershey Foods Company

    Morgan La Femina

    MBA 710

  • 2

    Introduction of the Company:

    Hershey Foods is the number one producer of chocolate in America. During 2009, Hershey

    Foods generated strong second quarter sales up 5.9 percent to 1.17 billion while overall profits were up

    to 71.3 million dollars. That was the fourth strong quarter in a row for the company. Milton Hershey

    founded Hershey Foods in 1908. Milton Hershey originally began his career as a candy maker. He

    originally opened up his own candy business and later in 1886 the Lancaster Caramel Company. In 1883,

    he began producing chocolate bars under Hershey Chocolate Company a division under the Lancaster

    Caramel Company. Milton Hershey met Bill Murrie in Pittsburgh in 1895 to help sell his candy bars. In

    1896, Hershey hired Murrie as a sales representative for his chocolate business. By 1900, Hershey

    decided to focus on chocolate and subsequently sold the Lancaster Caramel Company for $1 million.

    Hershey later used the sale of the Lancaster Caramel Company to fund a new factory for the Hershey

    Chocolate Company. In 1963, the company purchased the H. B. Reese Candy Company and in 1966 they

    moved into food with the purchase of San Giorgio and Delmonico Foods. Because of these purchases in

    1968, the company changed its name to the Hershey Foods Corporation. Finally in 1988 Hershey Foods

    purchased the U.S. interests of British candy maker Cadbury Schweppes PLC.

    Mission Statement Analysis:

    Bringing sweet moments of Hershey happiness to the world every day

    Hershey Foods mission statement is a brief explanation of what they seek to accomplish as a

    company, which is to bring their quality products to as many people as possible each day while providing

    them with a positive experience. However, the mission statement itself does not define the technology

    they use, their concern for survival and growth, their self-concept, their concern for their public image

    or any concern for their employees. Qualifiers below their Mission Statement later address this lack of

    definition in the above statement. The above Hershey Foods mission statement does include the worlds

    populace as their customers, the products they provide as moments of pleasure, their market as being

    the world and their philosophy as producing consistently excellent products to customers every day. The

    qualifiers the company lists are:

    To our stakeholders, this means:

  • 3

    Consumers: Delivering quality consumer driven confectionery experiences for all occasions

    Employees: Winning with an aligned and empowered organization while having fun

    Business Partners: Building collaborative relationships for profitable growth with our customers,

    suppliers, and partners

    Shareholders: Creating sustainable value

    Communities: Honoring our heritage through continued commitment to making a positive difference

    With these qualifiers provided by Hershey Foods, their self-concept is defined, the companys

    philosophy is expanded, concern for their public image is included, the companys attitudes towards

    their employees are expressed and technology is touched upon. Hershey Foods views itself as a quality

    producer of confectionaries that partners with its suppliers to maintain a strong business in line with

    their heritage of making a positive difference in the communities they serve. Hershey Foods strives to

    empower its employees, giving them the freedom to make choices that would benefit the company

    while maintaining a relaxed atmosphere. Finally, although the use of technology is not expressly stated,

    employment practices such as team empowerment, feedback with suppliers and supplying quality

    products require modern manufacturing practices.

    External Analysis:

    Industry Analysis: The External Factor Evaluation (EFE) Matrix for Hershey

    Key External Factors

    Opportunities Weight Rating Weighted

    Score

    1 Increased demand from emerging markets 0.12 3 0.36

    2 Ethical labor and environmental brand exposure 0.07 2 0.14

    3 New opportunities for marketing in a varied media

    environment

    0.1 3 0.3

    4 Diversity among consumer tastes spurring new 0.09 3 0.27

  • 4

    products

    5 Increase in global market space for products 0.12 3 0.36

    Threats

    1 Continued slow economic growth 0.06 2 0.12

    2 Increased price on main ingredients 0.13 4 0.52

    3 An increase in Health conscious consumer

    purchasing

    0.12 3 0.36

    4 Further fragmentation of the industry 0.07 2 0.14

    5 Increase in conversion of sugar to ethanol 0.12 3 0.36

    Total 1 2.93

    The average total weighted score is 2.93

    The average total weighted score is above average at 2.93. Hershey is well suited to maintain

    profitability, increase sales and expand globally. They are selling a majority of their products at mass

    merchant establishments as well as supermarkets. They are number two in America for confectionery

    sales, number one for chocolate sales in the US, number two in non-chocolate sales in the US and

    number one in the US for breath freshener sales. They operate in over 70 countries including India,

    China, Brazil, South Korea, the Philippines, Canada and all of Europe. The only weak spot is in gum sales

    controlling only 2.8 percent of the US market share and the continued increase in the cost of the raw

    commodities they use to produce their products.

    Rational:

    External Opportunities:

    1. Increased demand from emerging markets

    Although Hershey sales are still predominantly America based, they now have operating segments in

    Canada, Mexico, Brazil, India, Japan and China. These countries now have sizable middle class

  • 5

    communities with access to Hershey products and the potential sustained demand for Hershey

    products.

    2. Ethical labor and environmental brand exposure

    Hershey is actively working with the International Cocoa Initiative Foundation, the World Cocoa

    Foundation, the Roundtable on Sustainable Oil and encourages sustainable farming practices. These

    organizations seek to eliminate child labor, facilitate the purchase of supplies that have less of an impact

    on the environment and are produced with fewer chemicals.

    3. New opportunities for marketing in a varied media environment

    New opportunities for Hershey to market its products include, movie tie-ins, online, on television,

    through their interactive website and through social media sites. Although television advertising is not

    new to Hershey the large increase in channels and the ability to record shows

    4. Diversity among consumer tastes spurring new products

    Consumers desire a variety of chocolate candies and are also seeking alternative treats that are

    healthier than traditional sweets. There is an increased desire for different types of chocolate products

    such that the market can support those types; people will buy new and varied products if they are

    offered to the public. Consumers are also more health conscious wanting to snack healthier than they

    had in the past. These factors create and opportunity for Hershey to gain market share by creating new

    chocolate products as well as diverge from chocolate into healthy snacks.

    5. Increase in global market space for products

    Hersheys products are sold in millions of retail outlets as well as a variety of national chain stores.

    These chain stores are themselves expanding globally, which can offer new shelf space for Hershey

    products in these new countries.

    External Threats:

    1. Continued slow economic growth

    Continued slow economic growth here in the US and globally may slow their sales, and lower

    expected profits from Hershey Food Investments. This could in turn put pressure on the company to

  • 6

    decrease costs by cutting personnel, investments in manufacturing, research, development and

    marketing of their products.

    2. Increased price of main ingredients

    Cocoa and Sugar both commodities needed to produce Hershey products suffer from price

    fluctuations, which can only be partly mitigated by futures contracts. The price of both of these

    commodities has increased from 2007 to 2009 necessitating an increase in the final cost of Hershey

    confectionaries paid at consumer outlets.

    3. An increase in Health conscious consumer purchasing

    Nationally Americans are more health conscious. This is in part due to a significant increase in

    diabetes but also the aging of Americans, who as they become older are required to increase their

    healthy activities in order to decrease their statistical chances of chronic disease. Health conscious

    Americans are purchasing healthier foods and snacks while decreasing their purchasing of high fat, high

    calorie foods. Hershey must invest in new healthier foods if they are to maintain profitability.

    4. Further fragmentation of the industry

    American consumer tastes are varied and so too are their food buying habits. As the variety of

    consumer products has increased, so too has the consumers desire for new and varied products has

    increased. This cycle is reflected in most consumer industries but no more so than in the processed food

    industry. Hersheys market share can in part increase or decrease with the number of successful brand

    extensions they create in the next several years.

    5. Increase in conversion of sugar to ethanol

    Sugar is produced from sugar cane and alternately high fructose corn syrup. Hershey products by

    their nature require large amounts of sugar or alternate forms of sugar making the cost of

    manufacturing these products vulnerable to conversion to ethanol. If more ethanol is produced from

    sugar cane and corn then there is less available for food products increasing the scarcity of these

    commodities increasing their costs on the market. If the costs of these commodities rise because Brazil

    is converting more of its sugar cane into ethanol, the result will be an increase in the cost of

    manufacturing food products for Hershey.

  • 7

    Porters Analysis:

    Rivalry among competitors:

    High- Rivalry among Hersheys competitors is high and includes very large conglomerates such as Mars,

    Nestle, Cadbury and Tootsie Roll Industries Inc. These companies compete through very well-known

    brands and globally. They compete not only for space right next to Hershey products on the store shelf

    but also in most every place Hershey products can be found. These companies are well established and

    can compete both on price and product variety.

    Potential entry of new competitors:

    Medium- Although a few major companies, because of the products involved, dominate the industry the

    cost of entry is low. Smaller companies can gain a hold regionally through price or quality and then

    expand nationally.

    Potential Substitute of products:

    High- The potential to for substitution is high. Smaller companies can produce a variety of candies and if

    economies of scale are reached, meet the price point of Hershey products. What may not be easily

    substituted is Hersheys more sophisticated products which require more manufacturing expertise such

    as with their energy bars or sugar free products.

    Bargaining power of suppliers:

    Medium- The confectionery industry is dominated by large commodity producers in countries such as

    Brazil and India. They control a large segment of sugar and cocoa production in these countries from the

    planting of crops, to harvesting them and delivery to distributors. Internal state issues in these countries

    as well as within these commodity producers would easily increase the price of both sugar and cocoa

    negatively affecting the profitability of Hershey.

    Bargaining power of consumers:

    High- The products Hershey produces are foodstuffs and as such are easily substituted. In addition, they

    are not staple food products. These factors make it easy for customers to switch to lower cost

    substitutes, other brands or simply do without the product entirely. With prices for stable food,

  • 8

    products increasing there will be less demand for snack type foods, or higher priced snack foods.

    Customers can simply withhold buying Hershey products.

    Target Scope

    Low Cost Product Uniqueness

    Broad Cost Leadership Strategy

    X

    Differentiated Strategy

    Narrow Focused Strategy (low cost) Focused Strategy (Differentiation)

    Porter rational:

    Hershey will need to be a cost leader with a variety of both old and new food products for them

    to maintain or gain market share as well as maintain profitability. They will need to expand their core

    brand lines of Hershey Bar, Hershey Kisses, Reeses, and Twizzler, as well as build up new brands such as

    Special Dark, Dagoba, Ice Breakers and Breath Savers. Hershey should also expand non-sugar based

    products because of the rising cost of the ingredients that make up these products. This may help

    mitigate any negative impact on their profitability should sugar and cocoa costs continue to rise.

    The Competitive Factor Evaluations Matrix:

    Hershey Nestle Mars

    Critical Success Factors Weight Rating Score Rating Score Rating Score

    Brand recognition 0.13 4 0.52 3 0.39 3 0.39

    Product Quality 0.13 4 0.52 3 0.39 3 0.39

    Price Competitiveness's 0.14 3 0.42 3 0.42 4 0.56

  • 9

    Management 0.13 3 0.39 4 0.52 3 0.39

    Financial Position 0.12 3 0.36 4 0.48 3 0.36

    Customer Loyalty 0.11 4 0.44 3 0.33 3 0.33

    Global Expansion 0.17 3 0.51 4 0.68 3 0.51

    Market Share 0.07 2 0.14 4 0.28 3 0.21

    Total 1.00 3.30 3.49 3.14

    The Competitive Factor Evaluations Matrix shows that Hershey is well positioned against Mars but

    slightly behind Nestle, in part because of Nestles financial position, their market share and their global

    footprint. However, Hershey is well positioned in terms of brand recognition, customer loyalty and the

    quality of their products. The Hershey Trust Company controls the Hershey Company. At the time of the

    case, the chairperson of the board had been replaced. Hersheys management position may be weaker

    than its competitors because the trust has the right to cast over two thirds on any matter that requires

    common stockholders to vote upon. The result may be biased decisions regarding the company since

    the trust can make decisions without common stock holders approval. Their financial position is weaker

    than Nestle because a majority of its sales are US based and because cocoa costs have climbed from 40

    cents a pound in 1990 to 135 cents a pound in 2009.

    Internal Factor Evaluation Matrix:

    Industry Analysis: The Internal Factor Evaluation (IFEM) Matrix

    for Hershey

    Key Strengths Weight Rating Weighted

    Score

    1 Brand Recognition 0.12 4 0.48

    2 Consumer good will 0.09 3 0.27

    3 Strategic acquisitions and joint ventures 0.1 3 0.3

    4 Research and development 0.09 3 0.27

  • 10

    5 Employee empowerment 0.1 3 0.3

    Key

    Opportunities

    1 Independent board members needed 0.11 4 0.44

    2 Hedged futures contracts necessary 0.1 4 0.4

    3 Diversity among suppliers and shippers 0.11 4 0.44

    4 Lower manufacturing costs 0.08 3 0.24

    5 Increase in healthy snacks subdivisions 0.1 3 0.3

    Total 1 3.44

    The average total weighted score is 3.44

    Rational:

    The average total weighted score is 3.44, which is well above average for companies in this industry.

    They are well positioned in terms of research and growth, have made strategic acquisitions and continue

    to shore up weaker product lines through these acquisitions or through partnerships. However, again

    weakness is shown by their lack of a truly independent board, which is voted in by common stock

    holders.

    Key Strengths:

    1. Brand Recognition:

    They have iconic brands such as Hershey, Reeses, Kisses, Kit Kat, York and many others. These

    brands have been available and heavily marketed for many years and so have inherent value spanning

  • 11

    multiple generations. Any new company or major competitor has to compete against such long standing

    brand names that are extremely familiar to most individuals.

    2. Consumer Good Will:

    The Hershey Company has existed since the early 20th century and has developed positive good will

    for more than one hundred years. The company has collaborated with many organizations helping to

    prevent child labor, end adverse farming practices and promote environmental responsibility. They also

    have established a school and a theme park in Pennsylvania.

    3. Strategic Joint Ventures:

    Hershey Foods has acquired over forty other companies since its establishment. Some of the more

    notable acquisitions were H.B Reese, Delmonico Foods, San Giorgio, Y.S Brands, Nabisco, Leaf North

    America, Dagoba Organic Chocolate, LLC and Van Houten. These do not include their partnerships with

    organizations in various countries throughout the world. These ventures expand both their knowledge

    and product base.

    4. Research and Development:

    Hersheys acquisitions expand its patent base, its knowledge of other products along with the

    employees who can create those products, the equipment to produce new products and help foster

    creativity with the products it has now.

    5. Employee Empowerment:

    Hershey foods employees operate in a team environment where new ideas are fostered as well as

    creativity. This allows dynamic innovation to develop among its employees and then to be cultivated by

    managers into profitable results.

    Key Opportunities:

    1. Independent board members needed:

    Hershey Foods board members are appointed by those who own the Hershey Trust company, that is the

    Milton Hershey School Trust, as such they are also the controlling stockholders for the Hershey

  • 12

    Company. Therefore, their board is independent of any outside stockholders. This makes independent

    decisions difficult for those who have shares outside of those owned by the trust.

    2. Hedged futures contracts necessary

    Hershey Foods has and will continue to need to hedge their commodity purchases because of

    increased prices. Unfortunately, they will only be able to insulate themselves from only a portion of the

    price increases if there is a steep rise in costs because hedging only removes some of the risk associated

    with commodities purchasing.

    3. Diversity among suppliers and shippers

    Heresy Foods should attempt to increase their access to a variety of suppliers and shippers instead

    of relying on a few major suppliers. This is because of the inherent instability that having only one or

    two suppliers from one country creates. They may not need other suppliers at this time but instability in

    other parts of the world is increasing and so too may the risk of having only one or two suppliers in a

    country should that country eventually be afflicted with internal issues.

    4. Lower manufacturing costs

    As cocoa and sugar prices rise, the need for Hershey to decrease the cost in their manufacturing to

    offset those costs will increase. The competition for snack food purchase dollars is intense and snack

    foods are price sensitive, therefore they will need to reduce costs in other areas of food production if

    they are to keep shelf prices of their candies down to reasonable competitive levels.

    5. Increase in healthy snacks subdivisions

    As consumers desire for healthier snacks increase so too Hershey must increase their creation of

    healthy snacks. The market for snack foods, candies are driven by customer demands, and as such, they

    need to align their business model to fit that demand. If they do not fit their production with what the

    consumer demands, they risk losing market share and profits.

    Summary of Operating Results

    For the year ending December 31st 2009 2008 2007

    In millions of dollars except per share amounts

  • 13

    Net Sales 5298.7 5132.8 4946.7

    Cost of Sales 3245.5 3375.1 3315.1

    Gross Profit 2053.2 1757.7 1631.6

    Gross Margin 38.70% 34.00% 33.00%

    SM&A Expense 1208.7 1073 895.9

    761.6 589.9 458.8

    EBIT Margin 14.40% 11.50% 9.30%

    Interest Expense, Net 90.5 97.9 118.6

    Provision for Income Taxes 235.1 180.6 126

    Net Income 436 311.4 214.2

    Net Income Per Share- Diluted 1.9 1.36 0.93

    Hershey financials show an increase in net income from 2007 to 2009, an increase in gross profit

    from 2007 to 2009, a decrease in interest expenses for those three years and an increase in net income.

    The increase in gross profit margin from 33% in 2007 to 38.7% in 2009 is attributable to an increase in

    net sales, a decrease in the cost of those sales and a decrease in interest expenses. Net income has

    more than doubled from 2007 to 2009 while Hersheys gross profit margin has increased by 5.7 percent

    respectively. Sales growth is over 3 percent each year while earnings per share have increased by 45

    percent. Accounts payable has grown to 15% while total liabilities have decreased to 79% down from

    86%. Hershey Foods cash flow to sales has increased to 20%, which is up from 10% in 2008, and 15% in

    2007.

    SWOT Matrix:

    SWOT

    Strengths S

    Brand Recognition Consumer good will Strategic acquisitions and joint ventures

    Weaknesses W

    Independent board members needed Hedged futures contracts necessary Diversity among suppliers and

  • 14

    Research and development Employee empowerment

    shippers Lower manufacturing costs Increase in healthy snacks subdivisions

    Opportunities O

    Increased demand from emerging markets Ethical labor and environmental brand exposure New opportunities for marketing in a varied media environment Diversity among consumer tastes spurring new products Increase in global market space for products

    SO Strategies

    Hershey must leverage its brands through marketing the ethical ways they do business Hershey can promote its historical role in helping children and providing for its employees Hershey can create fast track programs for developing new products from employee ideas

    WO Strategies

    The trust could divest shares through sale Hershey can lower costs by manufacturing products in countries where they are purchased Hershey should develop a website for feedback on new products

    Threats T

    Continued slow economic growth Increased price on main ingredients An increase in Health conscious consumer purchasing Further fragmentation of the industry Increase in conversion of sugar to ethanol

    ST Strategies

    Hershey can increase sales through new partnerships with non-profit organization sales The company can create new products based off whole foods, fruits and grains The company should advocate for rational ethanol development

    WT Strategies

    The company should invest in financial instruments which generate sustainable returns above the rate of raw material cost increases Hershey must increase its supplier base while partnering with smaller confectionary companies

    Space Matrix:

    Financial Position Ratings

    Leverage 5 Working capital 4 Cash flow 4 13 Industry Position

    Growth potential 3 Profit potential 3 Financial stability 4 10 Stability Position

    Price range of competing products -3 Competitive Pressure -4 Price elasticity of demand -4 -12 Competitive Position

    Market Share -2 Product quality -1 Customer loyalty -2 -5

  • 15

    Conclusions: FP Average = 13/3 = 4.33 IP Average = 10/3 = 3.33 SP Average = -12/3 = -4 CP Average = -5/3 = -1.66 Space Matrix Coordinates: X-axis: CP+IP or (-1.66 + 3.33) = 1.67 Y-axis: FP+SP or (4.33 + -4) = .33

    Space Matrix analysis:

    The space matrix of Hershey Foods reveals a financially stable company that has some

    competitive advantages in the market place in a growing and mostly stable industry. Over time, Hershey

    Foods should work on increasing its financials as well as increasing its competitive advantage by

    expanding their product lines, lowering costs and perhaps vertically integrating some suppliers. These

    measures should increase their profile further into FP territory.

    BCG Matrix:

    High Medium Low

    FP

    6

    5

    4

    3

    2

    1

    CP IP

    -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 1 2 3 4 5 6

    -1

    -2

    -3

    -4

    -5

    -6

    SP

  • 16

    Medium Stars Breath freshener market share 33.6%

    ?s Non chocolates market share 14.8%

    Low Cash Cows Chocolate market share 34.3% Confectionary market share 28.7%

    Dogs Gum market share 2.5%

    From the BCG matrix, we can see that Hershey Foods cash cows are their chocolate products

    and their confectionery products. They generate the most revenue from their chocolate brands and

    their non-chocolate confectionery products. These brands also control a sizable market share in their

    respective categories. Hershey Foods star product is their breath freshener divisions that controls the

    most market share in that division ahead of any other competitor. Although it does not produce as much

    revenue as their cash cows, with very little overhead it can turn into a cash cow for the company. The

    companys question marks are in their non-chocolate non-confectionery division. This division consists

    mainly of salty snack products, with investment these products could become stars or cash cows. As for

    the moment, they control an average market level in their product category and generate some

    revenue. Hershey Foods dog division is their gum division. It ranks last in market share at 2.5%, although

  • 17

    still generating 2 billion dollars in revenue for the company. It is a dog in the sense of controlling market

    share. Should Hershey find a means to increase their market share in the gum category, those products

    will generate much more revenue than it had in the past.

    Strategy Recommendations:

    I recommend that Hershey Foods expand their marketing to alternate consumer channels,

    increase the number of suppliers they have contracts with, enter into more partnerships with smaller

    firms, acquire suppliers, increase non-cocoa and non-sugar based products and increase the variety of

    healthy snack foods they produce as well as gum products they produce. I believe this will increase their

    market share, their revenue, decrease their reliance on suppliers, reduce their susceptibility to external

    environmental factors and increase their desirability among consumers or potential consumers of their

    products.

    Epilogue Section:

    Since the case was written net sales have increased, earnings per share has increased from 2.18

    dollars to 2.82 dollars, long term debt has decreased by over 400 million dollars and cash flow has

    decreased from 1474.6 million dollars in 2009 to 1231.8 million dollars in 2011. In addition, capital

    expenditures have increased from 145 million dollars in 2009 to 348 million dollars in 2011 and common

    stock prices for Hershey Foods have increased from around 38 dollars in 2009 to 62 dollars in 2011. The

    increase in capital expenditures is due to facility upgrades as well as acquisitions. Cocoa prices continued

    fluctuate but overall rise with cocoa at 1.34 dollars per pound in 2009, 1.50 dollars per pound in 2010

    but then dropping back to 1.00 dollars per pound in 2010. Finally, sugar prices continue to rise with 15

    cents per pound in 2009, 27 cents per pound in 2010 and 28 cents per pound in 2011. Since the case was

    written it seems that Hershey has indeed expanded its product line while shoring up its finances and

    increasing their marketing with expenditures almost up 200,000 thousand dollars since 2009.

  • 18

    References

    David, F. R. (2011). Strategic management: concepts and cases (13th ed.). Upper Saddle River, N.J.:

    Prentice Hall.

    HSY Annual Income Statement - Hershey Co. Annual Financials. (n.d.). MarketWatch - Stock Market

    Quotes, Business News, Financial News. Retrieved July 2, 2012, from

    http://www.marketwatch.com/investing/stock/hsy/financials

    Hershey 10k. (n.d.). The Hershey Company. Retrieved July 2, 2012, from

    www.hersheys.com/assets/pdfs/hersheycompany/TheHersheyCompany_10K_20120217.pdf

    Hershey Foods Corporation - From Caramel to Chocolate, Chocolate for Everyone. (n.d.). Reference For

    Business - Encyclopedia of Small Business, Business Biographies, Business Plans, and

    Encyclopedia of American Industries. Retrieved July 3, 2012, from

    http://www.referenceforbusiness.com/businesses/G-L/Hershey-Foods-Corporation.html

    Hersheys. (n.d.). The Hershey Company. Fact Book. Retrieved July 3, 2012, from

    www.thehersheycompany.com/assets/pdfs/hersheycompany/FactBook-October-2011.pdf

    The Hershey Company. (n.d.). The Hershey Company. Retrieved July 2, 2012, from

    www.thehersheycompany.com/