10-year facility plan (including the 3-year capital plan) · pdf file10-year facility plan...

10-Year Facility Plan

(Including the 3-Year Capital Plan)

2008-2009 to 2017-2018

(An Update to the 2007-2008 to 2016-2017 Plan)

June 2007

Table of Contents Map of St. Albert ............................................................................................................................ 1

Overview......................................................................................................................................... 3

Detailed Costing.............................................................................................................................. 6

10-Year Facility Plan Summary, 2008-2009 to 2017-2018............................................................ 8

3-Year Capital Plan, A Subsection of the 10-Year Facility Plan, 2008-2009 to 2010-2011........ 13

Appendices.................................................................................................................................... 24

Appendix 1 - Municipal Planning............................................................................................. 25

Appendix 2 - Utilization & Enrolment ..................................................................................... 27

Appendix 3 -Schools Projected Enrolment............................................................................... 34

Map of St. Albert

1

Overview

3

10-YEAR FACILITY PLAN

Overview

St. Albert Protestant Schools currently houses over 6,700 (6,477 FTE) students in 14 schools, one of which is an Outreach School. The district also partners with Greater St. Albert Catholic Regional Division No. 29 in a Storefront School, currently operated by the Catholic Division. The thirteen school buildings within the district vary in age from 16 to 49 years. A profile of each school has been provided in the plan. The district’s 3-Year Capital Plan identifies the need for a new school. It also identifies six schools in need of full or partial modernization and some in need of additional space. The top priorities identified by the district are listed below:

New School in the Northeast Quadrant Additional New Space 2008-2009 William D. Cuts Junior High School CTS Addition and Modernization 2008-2009 Bellerose Composite High School Addition and Partial Modernization 2009-2010 Ecole Paul Kane High School Modernization 2009-2010 Ecole Leo Nickerson Elementary School Modernization 2009-2010 Ecole Muriel Martin Elementary School Modernization (Additional Space)

Through Replacement of Existing Portables

2010-2011

Robert Rundle Elementary School Modernization and Gym Addition 2010-2011 New Modular Classrooms Additional Space and Replacement

of Existing Portables 5 per year

In April 2000, Alberta Infrastructure concluded its evaluation of provincial school buildings; the results of which determine the allocation of modernization and replacement funding to school jurisdictions. In assessing the needs of the district over the next ten years, detailed analyses of enrolments and utilizations, jurisdictional and municipal growth, and individual school programming and circumstances were completed. Short Term: The impact of the recent development in the northeast and in North Ridge, a new neighborhood in northwest St. Albert, has been considered in the formulation of the district’s 3-Year Capital and 10-Year Facility plans and our assessment of need for a new school in the northeast quadrant of the city. Currently the only school site for St. Albert Protestant Schools in the north half of the city is the Erin Ridge school site, in the northeast quadrant. Therefore, at the present time, this site is critical to the district’s future plans. Balancing St. Albert’s growth northward is dependent on placing a new school on the northeast school site.

4

Medium to Long Term: We acknowledge that a new school in the northeast will not address all of our growth needs over the next ten years. The anticipated completion of the western bypass route has triggered rapid growth in the northwest section of St. Albert. In addition, the 2007 annexation of approximately 1,300 hectares of land to the north and west of the city has increased the land base of St. Albert by approximately one-third. There is considerable pressure to develop this land. It is expected that substantial development in the northwest will significantly accelerate student enrolment growth in the district. St. Albert Protestant Schools will require more space in the northwest section of St. Albert when this occurs. Although we would prefer a second new school we have looked at the existing school, Sturgeon Heights, located in the North Ridge subdivision, which is owned and operated by the Sturgeon School Division. In the interests of flexibility and financial responsibility the district may consider taking over that facility, contingent upon it being modernized, as an alternative to having a new school built in the northwest part of St. Albert in the upcoming decade. This issue will continue to escalate as St. Albert students enrol in a school owned and operated by a non St. Albert school board, due to its relative proximity to the emerging neighborhood and its location within St. Albert’s city limits.

5

Detailed Costing

6

10-YEAR FACILITY PLAN AND

3-YEAR CAPITAL PLAN

Detailed Costing Alberta Infrastructure and Transportation completed School Facilities Evaluation audits in 2000. These audits provided detailed estimates of costs that can be updated upon request. In the past the awarding of concept development funding, which allowed for the development of a plan and its related costs, proved to be a very efficient way to proceed. The costs contained in the electronic submission of the 3-Year Capital Plan to the Alberta government reflect the currently allowed costs at rates prescribed by the Province. In April 2006 responsibility and funding for capital projects transferred to Alberta Education from Alberta Infrastructure and Transportation. However, Alberta Infrastructure and Transportation continues to provide technical advice on existing facilities and new construction projects and manages the overall construction process.

7

10-Year Facility Plan Summary

2008-2009 to 2017-2018


8

10-Year Facility Plan Summary 2008 – 2018

(ECS counted as 0.5)

(In Alphabetical Order) A New School/North Side of St. Albert The district has an immediate need for a new school on the north side (specifically the northeast quadrant) of St. Albert. The new school will not be a high school; exact size and configuration will be determined upon the completion of the concept development stage. It will definitely have an elementary component. It will likely necessitate some reconfiguring of existing crowded schools. A proposal for funding a study was submitted to the Department of Infrastructure and Transportation in 2004-2005. The district now acknowledges the time for a study has likely expired and the need for a new school is imminent. Bellerose Composite High School 49 Giroux Road, St. Albert, AB Enrolment: 1090 FTE The facility audit raw score was 310. The addition of two portables and a corridor was approved and completed in 2000. An eight classroom addition was approved and constructed in 2001. In order to address the over-utilization of this school, another portable was relocated from Elmer S. Gish School in the summer of 2004. The delivery and set up of a new modular classroom, the reorientation of two existing portables, and construction of a connecting corridor was approved and completed in the spring of 2007. A design report was completed by Workun Garrick Architects to further address facility needs for instructional requirements. This facility is identified in the 3-Year Capital Plan. Ecole Leo Nickerson Elementary School 10 Sycamore Avenue, St. Albert, AB Enrolment: 530.5 FTE The facility audit raw score was 500. As a result of the class size initiative and the resulting accommodation issues the district met with Alberta Education and Alberta Infrastructure in January 2005. Subsequently an emergent request was submitted to Alberta Infrastructure on February 10, 2005. A letter approving the relocation of an existing district portable and two new modular classrooms was received on June 20, 2005. A portable was relocated from Ecole Muriel Martin Elementary School to Ecole Leo Nickerson Elementary School in August 2005. Two new modular classrooms were delivered in June 2006 and construction of the connecting link was completed in time for the start-up of the new school year in September.

9

Utilization continues to grow. Therefore the program configuration at the school will continue to be monitored as the district reviews student and program accommodation. The 1967 section of the school will require re-roofing within a few years. The school is identified in the 3-Year Capital Plan. Ecole Muriel Martin Elementary School 110 Deer Ridge Drive, St. Albert, AB Enrolment: 480 FTE The facility audit raw score was 220. The school has an abundance of portables and consideration must be given to replacing them with an addition of permanent space. Enrolment has leveled in recent years at Muriel Martin due to a maturing neighborhood. However, as the Northwest section grows, a resurgence is expected. The school is identified in the 3-Year Capital Plan. Ecole Paul Kane High School 12 Cunningham Road, St. Albert, AB Enrolment: 1,025 FTE The facility audit raw score was 260. Due to the building’s age and high population a full modernization is required within the next few years. It is identified in the 3-Year Capital Plan. A CTS upgrade of the program space is an immediate concern. Ecole Sir George Simpson Junior High School 50 Grosvenor Boulevard, St. Albert, AB Enrolment: 648 FTE The facility audit raw score was 480. Sir George Simpson underwent Phase I of a full school modernization in 1993. Phase II was completed in the 2002-2003 school year. Significant crowding problems are experienced at Ecole Sir George Simpson Junior High School. Elmer S. Gish School 75 Akins Drive, St. Albert, AB Enrolment: 330.5 FTE The facility audit raw score was 220. An interior modernization of the portables area was completed under the Infrastructure Maintenance Program (IMP) in 2000. Keenooshayo Elementary School 40 Woodlands Road, St. Albert, AB Enrolment: 337.5 FTE The facility audit raw score was 210. Normal maintenance and repairs will continue including utilizing Infrastructure Maintenance and Renewal (IMR) block funding as required.

10

Lorne Akins Junior High School 4 Fairview Blvd, St. Albert, AB Enrolment: 424 FTE The facility audit raw score was 840. The school was in need of a full modernization. A full modernization was approved and construction began in May 2005 and was completed in April 2006. Due to the tenders being over budget the scope of the project needed to be reduced. The Industrial Arts lab was taken out of the modernization project. It will be upgraded this summer utilizing Infrastructure Maintenance and Renewal (IMR) block funding. Portables The district has over 60 portables that are located at various schools. They range in age from 13 to approximately 32 years old. The district suggests that the provincial government needs to implement a supported schedule of regular replacement to address the deteriorating quality of these important classroom spaces. More details regarding the district’s portables are provided in the 3-Year Capital Plan. Robert Rundle Elementary School 50 A Grosvenor Boulevard, St. Albert, AB Enrolment: 217 FTE The facility audit raw score was 560. Robert Rundle is in desperate need of a new enhanced gymnasium. This is especially evident with the implementation of the Daily Physical Activity Initiative. This school is identified in the 3-Year Capital Plan. Ronald Harvey Elementary School 15 Langley Avenue, St. Albert, AB Enrolment: 253 FTE The facility audit raw score was 130. Ronald Harvey benefited from a partial modernization and a “face lift”. A portion of the block modernization funding was utilized for this in 2001-2002. The utilization of the school is expected to increase significantly with the development of the North Ridge and Timberlea subdivisions. Sir Alexander Mackenzie Elementary School 61 Sir Winston Churchill Avenue, St. Albert, AB Enrolment: 504.5 FTE The facility audit raw score was 200. The ongoing high utilization of this school will continue as it receives many students from the northeast quadrant of St. Albert.

11

Wild Rose Elementary School 58 Grenfell Avenue, St. Albert, AB Enrolment: 211 FTE The facility audit raw score was 330. Normal maintenance and repairs will continue including utilizing Infrastructure Maintenance and Renewal (IMR) block funding as required. William D. Cuts Junior High School 149 Larose Drive, St. Albert, AB Enrolment: 315 FTE The facility audit raw score was 410. Prior capital submissions include a modernization and a CTS addition for this school that is urgently needed. Concept development funding was approved and a study was completed by Stephens Kozak Carr and Brown Architects in January 2001. W. D. Cuts School was constructed in 1978 and since that time educational and administrative program requirements have changed significantly. As a result, the general office and reception area of the school and the adjacent student time-out spaces were no longer capable of successfully meeting the schools needs. Minor modifications to this area of the school and replacement of the concrete sidewalk at the entrance of the school were completed in the spring of 2006 using Infrastructure Maintenance and Renewal (IMR) block funding. W. D. Cuts School was previously our number one priority and is identified in the 3-Year Capital Plan. It was only bumped out of the number one position due to our need for a new school. As the northwest section of St. Albert grows, W. D Cuts will be critical to serving the student population in this area of St. Albert as it is the only junior high school north of the river.

12

13

3-Year Capital Plan A Subsection of the 10-Year

Facility Plan

2008-2009 to 2010-2011



3-Year Capital Plan

The district’s 3-Year Capital Plan identifies six schools in need of full or partial modernization and some in need of additional space. It also identifies the need for a new school. The requests outlined in this plan are essential and most relate directly to enhancing educational programming. The completion of these projects is crucial to avoid the marginalization of our district’s students because of programs not being offered due to facility constraints. District Priorities

New School in the Northeast Quadrant Additional New Space 2008-2009 William D. Cuts Junior High School CTS Addition and Modernization 2008-2009 Bellerose Composite High School Addition and Partial Modernization 2009-2010 Ecole Paul Kane High School Modernization 2009-2010 Ecole Leo Nickerson Elementary School Modernization 2009-2010 Ecole Muriel Martin Elementary School Modernization (Additional Space)

Through Replacement of Existing Portables

2010-2011

Robert Rundle Elementary School Modernization and Gym Addition 2010-2011 New Modular Classrooms Additional Space and Replacement

of Existing Portables 5 per year

NEW SCHOOL – 2008-2009 1. Northeast

The district has a fundamental need for a new school in the northeast. The intermunicipal development plan released by the City of St. Albert in March 2001 predicted substantial growth in the northeast quadrant of St. Albert that substantiates the large expected residual growth in this quadrant of the city.

Given that the Erin Ridge school site is the only school site St. Albert Protestant Schools has north of the river, this site and the entire northeast quadrant remains critical for St. Albert Protestant Schools. The district is committed to neighborhood schools, and therefore is concerned that it currently serves approximately 857 students in a quadrant where we have no school. All of these students are currently bussed. A new school would greatly alleviate ongoing transportation costs and in addition substantially reduce the resulting impact on the environment.

14

Furthermore, the schools that primarily serve students coming from the northeast area, namely Sir Alexander Mackenzie (82%) and Lorne Akins Junior High (96%), are highly utilized. The district has a serious concern with respect to overcrowding due to growth in northern St. Albert.

2. Northwest

In January 2007 the size of the City of St. Albert increased by approximately one-third when it annexed approximately 1,300 hectares of land to the north and west of the city. There is significant pressure to develop this area in the immediate future. Currently the district’s only school site on the north side of the Sturgeon River is the Erin Ridge site in the northeast quadrant of St. Albert. The district’s schools on the north side are heavily utilized: Muriel Martin Elementary – 83%, Ronald Harvey Elementary – 70%, William D. Cuts Junior High – 71%, and Bellerose Composite High School – 96%. (The utilization rates used are from a May 2007 report from Alberta Infrastructure and Transportation that administration is currently verifying and adjusting). Due to geographical factors such as the City of Edmonton on the south side of St. Albert and Big Lake on the west side of St. Albert, residential growth and school space pressures will undoubtedly continue on the north side.

The North Ridge subdivision situated in the northwest corner of St. Albert is currently under rapid development. Development has been significantly accelerated with the expected completion of the western bypass route. When it is fully developed, it is anticipated that approximately 1,100 school age children will live in this area. Based upon current demographics, it is expected that approximately 300 of these students will be of elementary age attending St. Albert Protestant Schools.

15

16

Timberlea, a proposed development in the northwest quadrant adjacent to North Ridge, is also expected to fuel significant growth for the district.

Ronald Harvey School is currently designated by the district as the elementary school for the North Ridge community. However, although its utilization is 70%, it is a small school and currently has room for only 113 more students (or 60 students if taken to the 85% utilized factor).

3. Flexibility

The district’s immediate need is for a school in the northeast section of St. Albert.

The district remains committed to efficiency in education. To that end, the district continues to explore partnership arrangements with other organizations within and external to the school jurisdiction community.

After receiving a new school in the northeast, the district will still need to look at

other potential facility options to order to address its space requirements in the medium to long term. We may be willing to consider taking over Sturgeon Heights School, which is now within the boundaries of St. Albert and is owned and operated by the Sturgeon School Division, a non-St. Albert board. The number of St. Albert students attending Sturgeon Heights School continues to be problematic. After the district has built its new school in the northeast and then subsequently requires a school in the northwest, the district may be willing to consider taking over that facility as an alternative to having a new school built in this area. Naturally the school would have to be assessed for facility deficiencies. St. Albert Protestant Schools would request that any deficiencies be addressed through a modernization prior to the jurisdictional transfer occurring. In the past the district proposed the modernization and transfer of Sturgeon Heights School to St. Albert Protestant Schools. An extensive concept development report highlighting the various partnership opportunities was submitted to the department in December 1999 and presented an in-depth examination of this option.

WILLIAM D. CUTS JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL – 2008-2009 W.D. Cuts is not properly equipped as a junior high school. Programming needs of our students are not being met because of a lack of Industrial Arts and Home Economics facilities and opportunities. A CTS and modernization concept development study was completed by Stephens Kozak Carr and Brown Architects. A concept development report was approved by Alberta Infrastructure and undertaken by Stephens Kozak Carr and Brown Architects in January 2001. Following are the outstanding facility audit concerns: 1. The gymnasium roof requires replacement. 2. The building interior is generally in reasonable condition. 3. Handicapped access should be provided. 4. The complete mechanical systems require replacement, these include:

• the heating system; • the ventilation system;

17

• the plumbing system; • the mechanical system controls; and • the portables heating system.

5. CTS programming offerings are restricted because of the minimal CTS facilities in the school.

6. The emergency lighting requires upgrading. 7. There is a need for additional electrical outlets in each of the teaching areas. 8. There is a need for the building infrastructure to support technology in each of the

teaching areas. William D. Cuts received a facility audit raw score of 410, and is in need of a modernization and CTS addition. Observation and comments from facility review completed by Wood O’Neill O’Neill Architects Ltd. in February 1998: 1. The school is sited along Larose Drive and utilizes a school bus lane and parent/student

drop off lane that works very well. Parking is adequate, however new pedestrian paths have destroyed a portion of a playing field.

2. Two portables (1982) have been moved from William D. Cuts to Bellerose Composite High School during the 1999/2000 school year.

3. The school building is located in the “bottleneck” of the site; however there is room to expand CTS program space south east of the gym. The need has been expressed for a clean shop area/computer space to enhance CTS technology and design and information processing instructional space. This is a current capital submission. Provisions for industrial arts or home economics shops will be required. A CTS addition is a high district priority.

4. There are some good size (and volume) ancillary support spaces for band and drama, the science rooms and prep area are generous; that is, they meet guidelines and portable classrooms are a reasonable size.

5. Regular core building classrooms are 7 – 9.8 m2 under provincial guidelines. 6. Storage is in short supply and there has been some internal shuffling of space use to

improve functional planning. 7. Additional power and a 220-volt outlet is needed to accommodate school/community

events. 8. Costs would need to be updated to current expenses to provide guidance for adequate

provincial funding prior to approving and proceeding with the proposed project. BELLEROSE COMPOSITE HIGH SCHOOL – 2009/2010 The facility audit raw score was 310. Educational programs have changed since the opening of the school in 1988; modernization of existing facilities is required to accommodate current program needs. A theatre addition and addition to the CTS areas (Automotives, Welding, Cosmetology, and Foods) is required to meet instructional requirements.

18

Conclusions drawn from a design report to address facility needs completed by Workun Garrick Architects in January, 2001: 1. The Music and Fine Arts Program at Bellerose Composite High School has advanced

steadily with the school’s increased enrolment. The existing music room is now spatially inadequate to properly provide the level of instrumental and choral instruction offered at the school. In addition to this, the school’s Performing Arts program has outgrown the original 1988 Drama area. The existing drama “theatre” is incapable of accommodating large scale productions and requires a larger stage, fly tower and additional dressing room and prop storage facilities.

This report recommends that a new 250 to 300 seat theatre for Drama and Music program instruction and performance be constructed at the southeast corner of the existing facility. The theatre could serve as a district facility and serve a variety of district functions. Since the time of the 2001 study, school enrolment has grown. To accommodate the growth in the Fine Arts program and to allow for the space to be used for multipurposes, such as professional development activities and student meetings, the plan should be expanded to a 400 to 450 seat theatre.

2. The existing Mechanics program has also advanced steadily with the school’s increased

enrolment. The Mechanics area lacks the necessary space to operate a two station program with sufficient space to store vehicles, parts and tools. This report recommends that a 216 m2 eight bay garage addition be placed at the existing northeast school corner adjacent to supplement the existing Mechanics lab areas.

In addition to this, a standalone four bay, 97 m2 vehicle compound is proposed to store school facility vehicles and equipment. The compound would be self sustained, reduce equipment vandalism and theft, and provide welcomed visual relief of unsightly school equipment for neighbors and community members.

3. The existing Home Economics classroom and adjacent Art classroom are both too small

to accommodate their respective programs. To address this issue, it is recommended to expand the existing Home Economics classroom by relocating the Art Lab to the existing Music Room.

4. The existing Beauty Culture classroom is too small to accommodate the program’s

current enrolment. To address this issue, the existing Life Skills suite located just south of the existing Beauty Culture room has been modernized to accommodate this program and provide a common instructional space for Beauty Culture Theory.

5. Since staff requirements have increased along with student enrolment, the existing staff

workroom is undersized. To address this issue it is recommended that the existing workroom be expanded into a portion of the childcare area. Additional staff washrooms would also be provided within the expanded space.

There is also a pronounced lack of instructional welding (CTS) space in the school. A functional welding area is proposed in the present Horticultural two-storey space. The second floor could become space for storage or accommodating Beauty Culture, while the main floor would be

19

converted to a highly utilized welding CTS instructional space. The costs are necessitated as fire retardant material and an appropriate ventilation system would be required. Costs would need to be updated to current expenses to provide guidance for adequate provincial funding prior to approving and proceeding with the proposed project. ECOLE PAUL KANE HIGH SCHOOL – 2009/2010 Originally constructed in 1971, Paul Kane School is in need of a modernization. The installation of a new cosmetology lab was completed in January 2007 using Infrastructure Maintenance and Renewal (IMR) block funding. Observations and comments based on facility reviews for the capital plan from Workun Garrick Architects dated January 2005 and March 2002, Alberta Infrastructure School Facility Evaluation dated April 7, 2000, and Wood O’Neill O’Neill Architects Ltd. dated March 1998 are below. CTS Room and Program Upgrades A report was completed in 2004-05 by Workun Garrick Architects regarding the CTS rooms and programs identified by the school as areas of concern. Workun Garrick Architects January 2005 - Notes on Classrooms:

Drama • A raised sound booth is required at north end of the drama room. • Existing cabinets on north wall to be removed. • Provide new storage to both sides and below new raised sound booth. • Provide wall brackets to stack stage flats vertically along west exterior wall. • Existing small storage rooms to have existing interior walls removed. This area

converted to costume change area. • All materials not used on a regular basis are to be stored elsewhere.

Art Classrooms • Consider moving the kiln to one of the CTS labs. Remove adjacent counter and

sinks. • Provide new millwork along east wall. • Provide a new countertop to existing millwork along south exterior wall. • Use existing storage room for an office with two desks. • Review lighting. CTS Labs (3) Total • The existing CTS program has three separate lab spaces. Two labs were part of

the original 1971 construction, and the mechanics/electronics section was added in 1975.

• One new central office will serve the three labs.

20

Metal Fabrication Lab • All equipment relating to small engine/mechanics is to be removed from this lab

space. The lab will become the metals fabrication area. • Existing storage room in southeast corner of the metals fabrication area will be

wood storage for adjacent wood working lab (consider new concrete block walls for this room incorporating the existing project locker area).

• The existing office in the southwest corner of the metals fabrication area is to be removed.

• The metals fabrication area equipment and layout to be confirmed. • Existing floor to remain. • Review lighting and mechanical systems to suit new equipment layout. Wood Fabrication Lab • The equipment for this lab is to be reorganized to perimeter walls. • The existing dust collector is very noisy in this lab space. It was noted on site that

the existing walls are only gypsum board construction with a large open return air grille in the face of one wall.

• The condition of the existing dust collector is to be reviewed. It is also recommended that the dust collector be located in a new room with masonry walls built to the underside of the existing structure. Return air should be ducted back to this room to reduce sound transfer to lab space.

• New dust collector drops will be provided to each piece of new or relocated wood working equipment.

• Lighting systems and electrical supply to all equipment to be reviewed. Communications Technology Lab • The existing darkroom functions are not required with new CTS program.

Remove all associated darkroom equipment. Provide new sinks and base cabinets to suit requirements of screen printing program. One sink should be large (deep) to wash screens.

• Existing interior partition to south side of lab to be removed. • Provide 25 new computer stations in this lab. • Whiteboards will be required. • Maintain visibility from this lab to wood working lab. • Review lighting and mechanical systems for this room. • Review floor finishes for this room.

Approximate Cost Estimates:

• Drama room $34,000 • Art room $42,000 • CTS Graphic room $56,000 • CTS Building Construction room $89,000 • CTS Metal room $24,000 • Total CTS upgrade $245,000

21

Workun Garrick Architects March 2002 - Recommendations: 1. Modernization of the existing Paul Kane Drama Room (Theatre). 2. Construction of an exterior canopy to emphasize the school’s existing main entrance. Alberta Infrastructure School Facility Evaluation Project dated April 7, 2000 (Audit score 260): 1. Upgrading of stucco banding and potential retro-fit of cladding of exterior of

gymnasiums. 2. Painting and interior upgrading. 3. Millwork upgrading and replacement. 4. Barrier free access upgrading at doors. 5. Provide air conditioning for computer labs. 6. Add visual strobes to the fire alarm system to meet present code. 7. Upgrade flooring. 8. Costs would need to be updated to current expenses to provide guidance for adequate

provincial funding prior to approving and proceeding with the proposed project. Wood O’Neill O’Neill, 5 Year Capital Plan, March 1998 – Comments on Paul Kane High School: 1. This two-story building was originally constructed in 1971 with additions in 1975 and

1981. 2. Classroom sizes are variable, the regular ones ranging from 22.8 m2 under to 8.2 m2 over

guidelines. Most classrooms and ancillaries are under current area guidelines. 3. The school is 33 years old and aside from a few small areas of renovation in 1975 and

filling in a courtyard in 1981 to create what is now a student lounge area, the building is original. As such, the interior and exterior are due for a modernization.

4. There are remaining sections for re-roofing to be completed. 5. Plan for a modernization of the building systems within the next five years including

upgrade to barrier free design. 6. Costs would need to be updated to current expenses to provide guidance for adequate

provincial funding prior to approving and proceeding with the proposed project. ECOLE LEO NICKERSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL – 2009/2010 With a facility audit raw score of 500, Leo Nickerson School is in need of a full modernization. Observations and comments from a facility review completed by Wood O’Neill O’Neill in February 1998 and the facility audit review summary costs: 1. Resolve site drainage issues and on-going mechanical complaints in specific areas. 2. Look at expanding science lab to enhance specific programs for the higher grades in

particular and provide sufficient prep and storage area. 3. Continue to upgrade space and finishes as needed such as replacement of corridor coat

hooks with individual lockers, and roof repairs. 4. Costs would need to be updated to current expenses to provide guidance for adequate

provincial funding prior to approving and proceeding with the proposed project.

22

ECOLE MURIEL MARTIN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL – 2010/2011 Although it received a facility audit raw score of 220, Muriel Martin School is currently at an approximate 83% utilization rate and is in need of additional permanent space. The school currently services 480 students (ECS counted @ 0.5). It has twelve attached portables and one free standing portable. It is located in the north (growth) area of St. Albert and will remain heavily utilized. Construction of a permanent six to eight classroom addition on the southwest portion of the site is required. Observations and comments from a facility review completed by Thorkelsson Fry in November 2001 and the facility audit review summary assessment costs: 1. The school is at capacity and enrolment projections show that it will remain at capacity at

least to 2010 and beyond. 2. The school was built and designed for 8 portables and although there are 14 portables

there are a sufficient number of washroom fixtures as required by the Alberta Building Code. The travel distance to the nearest washroom from the 1993 pod is at least 55 meters. The travel distance from the 1998 portables is about the same but with the additional requirement of going outside. In our opinion washrooms should be added to reduce the distance students must travel to these facilities.

3. The 1993 portable pod is very close to the property line adjacent to residential area. The proximity of these originally created concerns with the neighboring property owners. Removing these portables would be appreciated by the neighbors.

4. The existing situation creates a circulation problem by forcing all student traffic through the open library area at the center of the school.

5. There is a significant shortage of storage space in the school. 6. Costs would need to be updated to current expenses to provide guidance for adequate

provincial funding prior to approving and proceeding with the proposed project. ROBERT RUNDLE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL – 2010/2011 With a facility audit raw score of 560, Robert Rundle Elementary School is in need of a full modernization. Observation and comments from a facility review completed by Wood O’Neill O’Neill in February 1998 and the facility summary assessment costs: 1. Look at the possibility of adding a new gymnasium that can be easily accessed by ramps,

or that does not require them. Convert the former gymnasium to a library and the library to an ECS/lunch/student gathering area. Upgrading of mechanical and electrical to code could be accomplished through partial modernization of the remainder of the school.

2. Convert three courtyards to multi-purpose indoor shared study spaces for the classroom clusters. In the layout, exiting needs to be maintained for the classrooms and to avoid dead end corridor situations.

3. Costs would need to be updated to current expenses to provide guidance for adequate provincial funding prior to approving and proceeding with the proposed project.

NEW MODULARS AND OLD PORTABLES Although portables are not specific to an individual school, but rather are located at numerous schools, it is incumbent on the district to comment on them specifically. The district has 61 portables and 3 modulars. The chart below indicates that the district’s portables range in age from 13 to approximately 32 years old. The district requests that the province implement a supported schedule of regular replacement of five old portables to new modular units per year. This will address the deteriorating quality of these important classroom spaces and avoid an emergence of health and safety issues as the portables meet and exceed their xpected useful lives. e

Ecole Muriel Martin Elementary School - 13 portables

• 1980 – 2 portables • 1982 – 2 portables • 1989 – 5 portables • 1990 – 4 portables

Elmer S. Gish School – 10 portables

• 1979 – 8 portables • 1980 – 1 portable • 1990 – 1 portable

William D. Cuts Junior High School – 8 portables

• 1978 – 8 portables Wild Rose Elementary School – 6 portables

• 1977 – 6 portables Sir Alexander Mackenzie Elementary School – 1 portable

• 1989 – 1 portable Ecole Leo Nickerson Elementary School – 4 portables and 2 modulars

• 1989 – 2 portables • 1994 – 2 portables • 2006 – 2 modulars

Keenooshayo Elementary School – 8 portables

• 1982 – 4 portables • 1994 – 4 portables

Bellerose Composite High School – 3 portables and 1 modular

• 1982 – 2 portables • 1990 – 1 portables • 2007 – 1 modular (not shown on Area, Capacity & Utilization Report yet)

Ronald Harvey Elementary School – 8 portables

• 1975 – 8 portables

23

Appendices

• Appendix 1 - Municipal Planning • Appendix 2 - Utilization & Enrolment • Appendix 3 - Schools Projected Enrolment

24

Appendix 1 Municipal Planning

25


City of St. Albert

The Regular School Needs Assessment Review, a joint effort between the City of St. Albert, Greater St. Albert Catholic Regional Division No. 29, and St. Albert Protestant Separate School District No. 6 was last completed in 2002. Valuable information is gleaned and incorporated into the district’s 10-Year Facility Plan and 3-Year Capital Plan from this study. However, results to date strongly indicate, in contrast to the provincial wide projected decline in school age children, St. Albert’s school age population will experience modest growth. The report is due to be revisited and the district’s plan can, at that time, be updated based on that information. Municipal planning information utilized in projecting enrolments was derived from the City of St. Albert’s 2005 Census publication. The following are excerpts from the executive summary taken from the 2005 census document, which provide a context for the district’s enrolment projections. Excerpts from the 2005 (most recent data) census document:

St. Albert’s population increased by 3.1% over the past two years, increasing from 54,588 in 2003 to 56,310 as of May 2005 (annual growth of 1.6%).

25% of the population are between the ages of 35 – 49, and 23% of the population are

between the ages of 5 – 19.

St. Albert’s most populated neighborhoods continue to be Grandin and Lacombe Park with 13.2% and 12.3% respectively, with Deer Ridge now a close third with 12%.

The majority of households, 76%, are single family dwellings, with an average household

size of 3.06 persons per home.

46% of people changing addresses are residents moving within St. Albert.

Of the 3,654 new residents to St. Albert, 40% moved from Edmonton, 27% came from other parts of Alberta, 23% from other parts of Canada, and 10% from other locations outside of Canada.

The largest number of residents (1106) with the same birth year are 45 years old, followed by

48 year olds (1037). According to the 2006 Canadian Census, the population of St. Albert in 2006 was 57,719 (an increase of 1,409 or 2.5% over 2005).

26

Appendix 2 Utilization & Enrolment

27

10-YEAR FACLITY PLAN

Utilization and Enrolment

Utilization The district’s most recent Area, Capacity and Utilization Report was received on May 18, 2007 and is presented on pages 30-33. Projected Enrolment St. Albert Protestant Schools continues to enjoy growth. All projections indicate this trend will continue. As indicated in the previous section on Municipal Planning, historical and future developments in the City of St. Albert were considered in formulating the enrolment projections for the district. Annexation Given that annexation occurred in January 2007, it is too recent to qualify its exact implications. However there is considerable pressure to develop the newly annexed area. It will significantly enhance and accelerate St. Albert Protestant Schools’ student enrolment growth in the upcoming years. Internal Projections Given the strong population growth experienced and predicted by the City of St. Albert, 2% growth has been generally incorporated into the district’s internal enrolment projections where appropriate. However there have been adjustments as required. Generally speaking, projections have been maintained using the principles of cohort survival. The spreadsheets for each school move student enrolment from one grade to the next grade in the upcoming year, i.e. 20 students in Grade 1 in 2005 will project to 20 students in Grade 2 in 2006, and so on. In the same way, enrolments are transferred from elementary to junior high schools and from junior high schools to senior high schools. However, cohort survival on its own is not an accurate projector of enrolment as there are other factors such as enrolment growth, program additions, and residential development that affect the projections. For example, within our district as the cohorts advance a grade each year typically every grade cohorts gets larger. Summaries for the district have been provided on pages 35 and 36. Individual school projections are contained on pages 37 to 50.

28

29

External Projections Pages 51 to 53 contain data from a study that the City of St. Albert, St. Albert Protestant Schools, and Greater St. Albert Catholic Regional Division No. 29 participated in. Although the study should be updated again because our results have exceeded the consultant’s projections, it provides decent data for estimates in 2006, 2011, and 2016. It attempts to incorporate population migrations into St. Albert and residential development. The data serves to further substantiate the internal projections. Please note this external data does not include estimates for Outreach. Conclusion Both the internal and external projections indicate that St. Albert Protestant Schools will continue to experience strong and stable student enrolment growth in the upcoming years. The predictions, in conjunction with the class size initiative, substantiate our need for a new school and additional space.

34

Appendix 3 Schools Projected Enrolment

• Internal Projections Pages 35-50 • External Projections Pages 51-53

GRADE 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016ECS 419 396 362 399 401 404 408 414 420 427 431 438 4431 399 414 410 373 412 415 418 422 428 434 441 445 4522 368 408 436 423 384 426 429 432 436 442 448 455 4593 420 398 412 450 436 394 439 442 445 449 455 461 4684 421 434 414 425 464 449 404 452 455 458 462 468 4745 438 426 461 428 438 478 462 415 465 468 471 476 4826 476 462 452 475 441 452 492 475 427 478 482 485 4907 485 475 466 480 504 469 480 521 504 456 507 511 5158 528 495 492 483 498 522 487 498 539 522 474 525 5299 520 549 527 510 500 516 540 505 516 557 540 492 54310 621 677 696 631 614 602 620 648 608 620 668 648 59311 666 655 686 722 656 639 626 645 673 632 645 693 67312 752 742 734 807 854 792 767 750 767 797 761 769 818ENROLMENT 6513 6531 6548 6606 6602 6558 6572 6619 6683 6740 6785 6866 6939GROWTH% 0.43% 0.27% 0.26% 0.89% -0.06% -0.67% 0.21% 0.72% 0.97% 0.85% 0.67% 1.19% 1.06%

ENROLMENT(ECS .5) 6304 6333 6367 6407 6402 6356 6368 6412 6473 6527 6570 6647 6718GROWTH% (ECS .5) 0.07% 0.47% 0.54% 0.62% -0.08% -0.71% 0.19% 0.69% 0.95% 0.83% 0.66% 1.18% 1.06%

OUTREACH 152 134 114 136 131 130 135 134 135 137 138 139 141ENROLMENT 6665 6665 6662 6742 6733 6688 6707 6753 6818 6877 6923 7005 7080

0.42% 0.00% -0.04% 1.20% -0.13% -0.67% 0.28% 0.69% 0.96% 0.87% 0.67% 1.18% 1.07%

ENROLMENT(ECS .5) 6456 6467 6481 6543 6533 6486 6503 6546 6608 6664 6708 6786 6859GROWTH% (ECS .5) 0.07% 0.18% 0.22% 0.95% -0.15% -0.71% 0.26% 0.66% 0.95% 0.84% 0.66% 1.17% 1.07%

OUTREACH ENROLMENT = GR 9 -12

DISTRICT TOTAL BY GRADE WITHOUT OUTREACH

PROJECTED ENROLMENTSACTUAL ENROLMENTS

DISTRICT TOTAL BY GRADE WITH OUTREACH

35

GRADE 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016BELLEROSE 1086 1125 1091 1102 1086 1088 1083 1100 1103 1103 1116 1135 1122ELMER S. GISH 343 320 331 400 403 429 419 411 398 409 406 407 409KEENOOSHAYO 299 316 338 332 325 332 325 312 305 311 314 314 315LEO NICKERSON 491 512 531 494 524 559 557 556 562 584 585 590 597LORNE AKINS 440 422 424 420 458 432 432 439 454 443 439 442 461MURIEL MARTIN 492 497 480 485 492 504 526 539 553 559 572 584 594PAUL KANE 953 949 1025 1058 1038 945 930 943 945 946 958 975 962ROBERT RUNDLE 233 225 217 209 207 199 203 208 199 216 217 217 220RONALD HARVEY 244 252 253 261 274 288 298 312 324 333 342 352 361SIR ALEX. MACKENZIE 509 513 505 495 479 470 462 452 466 463 468 474 477SIR GEORGE SIMPSON 639 648 648 630 602 586 606 615 636 621 617 621 647WILD ROSE 214 224 211 208 194 197 199 193 184 202 202 202 203WILLIAM D. CUTS 363 331 315 314 321 329 329 334 345 337 335 337 351ENROLMENT WITHOUT OUTREACH (ECS .5) 6304 6333 6367 6407 6402 6356 6368 6412 6473 6527 6570 6647 6718

OUTREACH 152 134 114 136 131 130 135 134 135 137 138 139 141ENROLMENT(ECS .5) 6456 6467 6481 6543 6533 6486 6503 6546 6608 6664 6708 6786 6859

DISTRICT TOTAL FTE BY SCHOOL


36

GRADE 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016ECS12345678910 359 370 314 334 325 319 328 343 322 328 353 343 31411 353 376 363 332 353 344 337 347 362 340 347 372 36212 374 379 414 436 408 425 418 410 419 435 416 420 446OUTREACHENROLMENT 1086 1125 1091 1102 1086 1088 1083 1100 1103 1103 1116 1135 1122GROWTH% 2% 4% -3% 1% -1% 0% 0% 2% 0% 0% 1% 2% -1%

ASSUMPTIONS:GRADE 10 ENROLMENT BASED ON 52% OF DISTRICT GRADE 9 ENROLMENT PLUS 15% (BASED ON 5 YEAR AVERAGE INCREASE BETWEEN GRADE 9 AND 10)PROJECTIONS FROM 2007 AND ON PLUS 12 STUDENTS PER GRADE TO ENCOMPASS NORTHRIDGE GROWTHGRADE 10 STUDENTS MOVED UP TO GRADE 11 IN SUBSEQUENT YEAR PLUS 2% ENROLMENT GROWTHGRADE 11 STUDENTS MOVED UP TO GRADE 12 IN SUBSEQUENT YEAR PLUS 2% ENROLMENT GROWTHGRADE 11 STUDENTS MOVED UP TO GRADE 12 IN SUBSEQUENT YEAR PLUS 13% (RETURNING GRADE 12 PLUS ENROLMENT GROWTH BASED ON 5 YEAR AVERAGE)

BELLEROSE


37

GRADE 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016ECS 43 34 39 39 38 39 39 39 40 40 40 41 411 35 37 41 40 40 39 40 40 40 41 41 41 422 31 30 45 42 41 41 40 41 41 41 42 42 423 27 31 32 46 43 42 42 41 42 42 42 43 434 34 28 33 33 47 44 43 43 42 43 43 43 445 29 26 27 57 34 48 45 44 44 43 44 44 446 45 33 35 53 58 35 49 46 45 45 44 45 457 37 42 18 52 50 55 32 46 43 42 42 41 428 41 35 38 18 53 51 56 33 47 44 43 43 429 42 41 42 39 18 54 52 57 34 48 45 44 44101112OUTREACHENROLMENT 364 337 350 419 422 448 438 430 418 429 426 427 429GROWTH% -1% -7% 4% 20% 1% 6% -2% -2% -3% 3% -1% 0% 0%

ENROLMENT(ECS .5) 343 320 331 400 403 429 419 411 398 409 406 407 409GROWTH% (ECS .5) -4% -7% 3% 21% 1% 6% -2% -2% -3% 3% -1% 0% 0%

ASSUMPTIONS:ECS PROJECTIONS BASED ON PREVIOUS 3 YEAR AVERAGE ENROLMENT PLUS 2% ENROLMENT GROWTHALL STUDENTS MOVED UP TO NEXT GRADE IN SUBSEQUENT YEAR PLUS 2% ENROLMENT GROWTHGRADE 7 PROJECTION BASED ON 2% ENROLMENT GROWTH LESS 4 STUDENTS2007 PROJECTION INCLUDES AN INCREASE OF 23 GRADE 5 STUDENTS AND 25 GRADE 6 STUDENTS TO ACCOMMODATE LOGOS PROGRAMMOVING FROM LEO NICKERSON2007 PROJECTION INCLUDES AN INCREASE OF 20 GRADE 7 STUDENTS TO ACCOMMODATE LOGOS PROGRAM MOVING FROM SIR GEORGE SIMPSON

ELMER S GISH


38

GRADE 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016ECS 51 42 39 43 46 45 44 44 45 46 46 46 461 45 50 53 40 44 47 46 45 45 46 47 47 472 28 52 59 54 41 45 48 47 46 46 47 48 483 53 33 54 60 55 42 46 49 48 47 47 48 494 44 53 43 55 61 56 43 47 50 49 48 48 495 57 46 56 44 56 62 57 44 48 51 50 49 496 46 61 53 57 45 57 63 58 45 49 52 51 50789101112OUTREACHENROLMENT 324 337 357 353 348 354 347 334 327 334 337 337 338GROWTH% 4% 4% 6% -1% -1% 2% -2% -4% -2% 2% 1% 0% 0%

ENROLMENT(ECS .5) 298.5 316 338 332 325 332 325 312 305 311 314 314 315GROWTH% (ECS .5) 4% 6% 7% -2% -2% 2% -2% -4% -2% 2% 1% 0% 0%

ASSUMPTIONS:ECS PROJECTIONS BASED ON PREVIOUS 5 YEARS AVERAGE ENROLMENT PLUS 2% ENROLMENT GROWTHALL STUDENTS MOVED UP TO NEXT GRADE IN SUBSEQUENT YEAR PLUS 2% ENROLMENT GROWTH

KEENOOSHAYO


39

GRADE 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016ECS 93 88 69 85 82 80 84 84 84 86 86 87 881 90 87 79 70 87 84 82 86 86 86 88 88 892 81 87 88 81 71 89 86 84 88 88 88 90 903 78 76 89 90 83 72 91 88 86 90 90 90 924 67 84 77 91 92 85 73 93 90 88 92 92 925 70 69 86 56 93 94 87 74 95 92 90 94 946 58 65 77 63 57 95 96 89 75 97 94 92 96789101112OUTREACHENROLMENT 537 556 565 536 565 599 599 598 604 627 628 633 641GROWTH% 12% 4% 2% -5% 5% 6% 0% 0% 1% 4% 0% 1% 1%

ENROLMENT(ECS .5) 491 512 531 494 524 559 557 556 562 584 585 590 597GROWTH% (ECS .5) 12% 4% 4% -7% 6% 7% 0% 0% 1% 4% 0% 1% 1%

ASSUMPTIONS:ECS PROJECTIONS BASED ON PREVIOUS 3 YEAR AVERAGE ENROLMENT PLUS 2% ENROLMENT GROWTHALL STUDENTS MOVED UP TO NEXT GRADE IN SUBSEQUENT YEAR PLUS 2% ENROLMENT GROWTH2007 PROJECTION INCLUDES A REDUCTION OF 23 GRADE 5 STUDENTS AND 25 GRADE 6 STUDENTS TO ACCOMMODATE LOGOS PROGRAMMOVING TO E S GISH

LEO NICKERSON


40

GRADE 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016ECS1234567 143 117 155 140 142 129 140 149 144 129 145 147 1488 151 152 112 162 147 149 136 147 156 151 136 152 1549 146 153 157 118 169 154 156 143 154 163 158 143 159101112OUTREACHENROLMENT 440 422 424 420 458 432 432 439 454 443 439 442 461GROWTH% 3% -4% 0% -1% 9% -6% 0% 2% 3% -2% -1% 1% 4%

ASSUMPTIONS:GRADE 7 ENROLMENT BASED ON 32% OF DISTRICT GRADE 6 ENROLMENT (NOT INCLUDING E. S. GISH, PREVIOUS 5 YEAR AVERAGE) GRADE 7 ENROLMENT PLUS 4 STUDENTS TO ACCOMMODATE DEVELOPMENT IN THE NORTHEAST PLUS 2% ENROLMENT GROWTHALL STUDENTS MOVED UP TO NEXT GRADE IN SUBSEQUENT YEAR PLUS 4 STUDENTS PLUS 2% ENROLMENT GROWTHGRADE 8 ENROLMENT IN 2006 PLUS 10 STUDENTS DUE TO COMPLETION OF SCHOOL MODERNIZATION

LORNE AKINS


41

GRADE 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016ECS 58 70 70 68 70 73 74 75 77 78 80 81 831 63 67 68 74 71 74 77 78 79 81 82 84 852 73 67 70 71 78 75 78 81 82 83 85 86 883 79 75 65 74 75 82 79 82 85 86 87 89 904 89 83 76 68 78 79 86 83 86 89 90 91 935 85 83 80 80 71 82 83 90 87 90 93 95 966 74 87 86 84 84 75 86 87 95 91 95 98 100789101112OUTREACHENROLMENT 521 532 515 519 527 540 563 576 591 598 612 624 635GROWTH% -10% 2% -3% 1% 2% 2% 4% 2% 3% 1% 2% 2% 2%

ENROLMENT(ECS .5) 492.0 497 480 485 492 504 526 539 553 559 572 584 594GROWTH% (ECS .5) -10% 1% -3% 1% 1% 2% 4% 2% 3% 1% 2% 2% 2%

ASSUMPTIONS:ECS PROJECTIONS BASED ON PREVIOUS 4 YEAR AVERAGE ENROLMENT PLUS 5% ENROLMENT GROWTH TO ENCOMPASS NORTH RIDGE GROWTHALL STUDENTS MOVED UP TO NEXT GRADE IN SUBSEQUENT YEAR PLUS 5% ENROLMENT GROWTH TO ENCOMPASS NORTH RIDGE GROWTH

FRENCH IMMERSION MOVED TO SIR GEORGE SIMPSON FOR GRADE 6 EFFECTIVE 1999 AND BACK TO MURIEL MARTIN EFFECTIVE 2005

MURIEL MARTIN


42

GRADE 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016ECS123456789 14 13 11 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13101112OUTREACH 138 121 103 123 118 117 122 121 122 124 125 126 128ENROLMENT 152 134 114 136 131 130 135 134 135 137 138 139 141GROWTH% -3% -12% -15% 19% -4% -1% 4% -1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1%

ASSUMPTIONS:ACTUAL ENROLMENTS REPORTED BY RACERS ENROLMENTS DO NOT INCLUDE ADULT STUDENTS EFFECTIVE 2003GRADE 9 PROJECTION IS PREVIOUS 3 YEAR AVERAGE PLUS 2% ENROLMENT GROWTHOUTREACH PROJECTION IS PREVIOUS 3 YEAR AVERAGE PLUS 2% ENROLMENT GROWTHAN EXCESS OF 400 STUDENTS ACCESS OUTREACH PROGRAMS EACH YEAR

OUTREACH


43

GRADE 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016ECS12345678910 262 307 382 297 289 283 292 305 286 292 315 305 27911 313 279 323 390 303 295 289 298 311 292 298 321 31112 378 363 320 371 446 367 349 340 348 362 345 349 372OUTREACHENROLMENT 953 949 1025 1058 1038 945 930 943 945 946 958 975 962GROWTH% -3% 0% 8% 3% -2% -9% -2% 1% 0% 0% 1% 2% -1%

ASSUMPTIONS:GRADE 10 ENROLMENT BASED ON 48% OF DISTRICT GRADE 9 ENROLMENT PLUS 15% (BASED ON 5 YEAR AVERAGE INCREASEBETWEEN GRADE 9 AND 10)GRADE 10 STUDENTS MOVED UP TO GRADE 11 IN SUBSEQUENT YEAR PLUS 2% ENROLMENT GROWTHGRADE 11 STUDENTS MOVED UP TO GRADE 12 IN SUBSEQUENT YEAR PLUS 2% ENROLMENT GROWTHGRADE 11 STUDENTS MOVED UP TO GRADE 12 IN SUBSEQUENT YEAR PLUS 13% RETURNING GRADE 12 BASED ON 5 YEAR AVERAGE

PAUL KANE


44

GRADE 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016ECS 28 40 20 30 31 28 30 30 30 31 31 31 321 33 26 39 20 31 32 29 31 31 31 32 32 322 34 28 26 40 20 32 33 30 32 32 32 33 333 33 39 27 27 41 20 33 34 31 33 33 33 344 45 32 40 28 28 42 20 34 35 32 34 34 345 32 42 37 41 29 29 43 20 35 36 33 35 356 42 38 38 38 42 30 30 44 20 36 37 34 36789101112OUTREACHENROLMENT 247 245 227 224 222 213 218 223 214 231 232 232 236GROWTH% -3% -1% -7% -1% -1% -4% 2% 2% -4% 8% 0% 0% 2%

ENROLMENT(ECS .5) 233.0 225 217 209 207 199 203 208 199 216 217 217 220GROWTH% (ECS .5) -2% -3% -4% -4% -1% -4% 2% 2% -4% 8% 0% 0% 2%

ASSUMPTIONS:ECS PROJECTIONS BASED ON PREVIOUS 3 YEAR AVERAGE ENROLMENT PLUS 2% ENROLMENT GROWTHALL STUDENTS MOVED UP TO NEXT GRADE IN SUBSEQUENT YEAR PLUS 2% ENROLMENT GROWTH

ROBERT RUNDLE


45

GRADE 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016ECS 41 34 38 40 40 42 43 45 46 48 49 51 521 42 36 36 41 43 43 45 46 48 49 51 52 542 33 43 36 39 44 46 46 48 49 51 52 54 553 35 40 41 38 41 46 48 48 50 51 53 54 564 41 34 37 43 40 43 48 50 50 52 53 55 565 36 42 39 39 45 42 45 50 52 52 54 55 576 36 40 45 41 41 47 44 47 52 54 54 56 57789101112OUTREACHENROLMENT 264 269 272 281 294 309 319 334 347 357 366 377 387GROWTH% 4% 2% 1% 3% 5% 5% 3% 5% 4% 3% 3% 3% 3%

ENROLMENT(ECS .5) 244 252 253 261 274 288 298 312 324 333 342 352 361GROWTH% (ECS .5) 4% 3% 0% 3% 5% 5% 3% 5% 4% 3% 3% 3% 3%

ASSUMPTIONS:ECS PROJECTIONS BASED ON PREVIOUS 3 YEAR AVERAGE ENROLMENT PLUS 2 STUDENTS TO ENCOMPASS NORTHRIDGE GROWTH PLUS 2% ENROLMENT GROWTHNORTH RIDGE SUBDIVISION ESTIMATED TO GENERATE APPROX. 100 ELEMENTARY STUDENTS WHEN MATURE; RONALD HARVEY DESIGNATED SCHOOL;STUDENTS AT ALL GRADE LEVELS (K-6) EXPECTED TO INCREASE BY 10 STUDENTS PER YEAR (100/10)GRADES ONE AND TWO STUDENTS MOVED UP TO NEXT GRADE IN SUBSEQUENT YEAR PLUS 2 STUDENTSGRADES THREE TO SIX STUDENTS MOVED UP TO NEXT GRADE IN SUBSEQUENT YEAR PLUS 1 STUDENTALL STUDENTS MOVED UP TO NEXT GRADE PLUS 2% ENROLMENT GROWTH

RONALD HARVEY


46

GRADE 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016ECS 71 53 71 66 65 69 68 69 70 70 71 72 721 66 74 57 72 67 66 70 69 70 71 71 72 732 62 73 78 58 73 68 67 71 70 71 72 72 733 74 74 77 80 59 74 69 68 72 71 72 73 734 75 77 80 79 82 60 75 70 69 73 72 73 745 95 85 89 82 81 84 61 77 71 70 74 73 746 101 103 88 91 84 83 86 62 79 72 71 75 74789101112OUTREACHENROLMENT 544 539 540 528 511 504 496 486 501 498 503 510 513GROWTH% 1% -1% 0% -2% -3% -1% -2% -2% 3% -1% 1% 1% 1%

ENROLMENT(ECS .5) 509 513 505 495 479 470 462 452 466 463 468 474 477GROWTH% (ECS .5) 0% 1% -2% -2% -3% -2% -2% -2% 3% -1% 1% 1% 1%


SIR ALEXANDER MACKENZIE


47

GRADE 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016ECS123456 297 198 218 203 182 205 187 202 214 208 187 210 212 2138 217 200 236 207 186 209 191 206 218 212 191 214 2169 195 230 209 241 211 190 213 195 210 222 216 195 218101112OUTREACHENROLMENT 639 648 648 630 602 586 606 615 636 621 617 621 647GROWTH% 6% 1% 0% -3% -4% -3% 3% 1% 3% -2% -1% 1% 4%

ASSUMPTIONS:GRADE 7 ENROLMENT BASED ON 44% OF DISTRICT GRADE 6 ENROLMENT (NOT INCL E. S. GISH, PREVIOUS 5 YEAR AVERAGE) PLUS 15 LATE FRENCH IMMERSION PLUS 2% ENROLMENT GROWTHALL STUDENTS MOVED UP TO NEXT GRADE IN SUBSEQUENT YEAR PLUS 2% ENROLMENT GROWTH2007 PROJECTION INCLUDES A DECREASE OF 20 GRADE 7 STUDENTS TO ACCOMMODATE LOGOS PROGRAM MOVING TO ELMER S GISH

SIR GEORGE SIMPSON


48

GRADE 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016ECS 34 35 16 28 29 28 26 28 28 28 28 29 291 25 37 37 16 29 30 29 27 29 29 29 29 302 26 28 34 38 16 30 31 30 28 30 30 30 303 41 30 27 35 39 16 31 32 31 29 31 31 314 26 43 28 28 36 40 16 32 33 32 30 32 325 34 33 47 29 29 37 41 16 33 34 33 31 336 45 35 30 48 30 30 38 42 16 34 35 34 32789101112OUTREACHENROLMENT 231 241 219 222 208 211 212 207 198 216 216 216 217GROWTH% -2% 4% -9% 1% -6% 1% 0% -2% -4% 9% 0% 0% 0%

ENROLMENT(ECS .5) 214 224 211 208 194 197 199 193 184 202 202 202 203GROWTH% (ECS .5) -4% 4% -6% -1% -7% 2% 1% -3% -5% 10% 0% 0% 0%


WILD ROSE


49

GRADE 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016ECS1234567 107 98 90 106 107 98 106 112 109 98 110 111 1128 119 108 106 96 112 113 104 112 118 115 104 116 1179 137 125 119 112 102 118 119 110 118 124 121 110 122101112OUTREACHENROLMENT 363 331 315 314 321 329 329 334 345 337 335 337 351GROWTH% -4% -9% -5% 0% 2% 2% 0% 2% 3% -2% -1% 1% 4%

ASSUMPTIONS:GRADE 7 ENROLMENT BASED ON 24% OF DISTRICT GRADE 6 ENROLMENT (FROM PREVIOUS 5 YEAR AVERAGE EXCEPT E.S.GISH) NORTH RIDGE SUBDIVISION ESTIMATED TO GENERATE APPROX. 125 JUNIOR HIGH STUDENTS WHEN MATURE; W.D. CUTS DESIGNATED SCHOOLSTUDENTS ARE EXPECTED TO INCREASE BY 12 STUDENTS PER YEAR (125/10)ALL STUDENTS MOVED UP TO NEXT GRADE IN SUBSEQUENT YEAR PLUS 4 STUDENTS (12/3)ALL STUDENTS MOVED UP TO NEXT GRADE IN SUBSEQUENT YEAR PLUS 2% ENROLMENT GROWTH

WILLIAM D. CUTS


50

2006 Enrolment by Grade (Forecast)1

2006 Student Enrolment by Grade (Forecast and Allocated By Applications) Grade

School ECS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Total

Sir Alexander Mackenzie 70 61 86 76 93 97 109 592Keenooshayo 45 34 43 37 44 46 61 310Leo Nickerson 68 61 71 58 60 79 58 453Muriel Martin 74 79 86 82 107 88 86 602Ronald Harvey 41 45 48 45 35 41 44 300Robert Rundle 28 28 29 33 37 39 44 238Wild Rose 22 20 25 33 31 34 40 205Elmer S. Gish 25 21 20 27 28 34 37 41 42 44 319Sir George Simpson 25 175 173 227 600Lorne Akins 133 168 163 464William D. Cuts 130 142 159 431Bellerose 372 311 385 1068Paul Kane 324 328 365 1017Subtotal 373 350 407 391 436 459 503 478 525 594 696 639 750 6600

1 Source: Applications Management Consulting Ltd. St. Albert Student Enrolment Projections Report October 2002

51


2011 Student Enrolments by Grade (Forecast and Allocated By Applications) Grade

School ECS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Total



52


2016 Student Enrolments by Grade (Forecast and Allocated By Applications) Grade

School ECS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Total Protestant



53

10-year facility plan (including the 3-year capital plan) · pdf file10-year facility plan...

Documents