10 smh.com.au association with the sydney editorial ... · now sims is inviting you to play an...

1
1HERSA1 A010 570 reasons to care about our harbour and coastline SIGN-UP NOW it’s free » You will receive the latest news and happenings at SIMS www.sims.org.au SIMS aims to be a world-class marine research and training institute All donations of $2 and over are tax deductible supporting our marine ecosystems There are at least 570 species of fishes and thousands of species of other marine creatures in Sydney Harbour, making it biologically one of the most diverse harbours in the world. Now SIMS is inviting you to play an important role in helping preserve NSW’s unique marine environment for the future. Photo Ezequiel Marzinelli 10 TUESDAY, DECEMBER 4, 2012 smh.com.au The Sydney Morning Herald EDITORIAL FEATURE IN ASSOCIATION WITH THE SYDNEY INSTITUTE OF MARINE SCIENCE LIVING HARBOUR: DYNAMIC SCIENCE Northern shore identified as flood risk Research into 21 kilometres of Manly and Middle Harbour shoreline has found areas under greatest threat from sea-level increases, erosion or severe storms, writes Melinda Ham. This would affect a large number of seafront properties. WAVES lash, tides drag the sand away and the sea levels rise incrementally.Coastal properties across Australia are at the mercy of the elements, but is it something to lose sleep over? A study by engineers from the University of NSW’s Water Research Laboratory (WRL) has tried to quantify this risk in the most in-depth study to date, focusing on the ocean and harbour beaches in the Manly local government area. The study looked at the present and future implications for 21 kilometres of shoreline within Middle Harbour and North Harbour, including 17 sandy beaches from Quarantine Beach in the Sydney Harbour National Park to the Spit Bridge. ‘‘The areas most at risk, where the seawalls need upgrading, are at Clontarf Reserve and Ellery’s Punt Reserve near the Spit,’’ says Alessio Mariani, who co- authored the report with fellow engineer James Carley. These areas are also vulnerable to inundation, which means they are low-lying and liable to be flooded in future sea- level-rise scenarios and storm surges. Mariani says that in a worst- case scenario, such as a once-in- 100-years storm with massive waves, if seawalls and other protection works fail, the land behind the wall will quickly erode. ‘‘The erosion would reach between five and 30 metres inland, depending on the area,’’ he says. ‘‘This would affect a large number of roads in the Manly local government area and a large number of seafront properties – public as well as private – which we can’t name as our report is still with the minister. The erosion would not take minutes but hours, which would give emergency services time to put up sandbags to protect the properties. ‘‘In general, Sydney Harbour is very resilient,’’ Mariani says. ‘‘The oldest seawalls date back to the 1800s and early 1900s. They are an accepted part of the built environment and do a good job. ‘‘While they have been successful for nearly 100 years, our study recommended that they be maintained and upgraded to face future risks. Seawalls only prevent erosion to progress further inland, however, the erosion process still continues at sea.’’ Using computer modelling, the engineers factored in projected sea-level rises of 40 centimetres by 2050 and 90 centimetres by 2100 to extrapolate different scenarios. They also looked at what would happen if the seawalls collapsed, and the possible effects of major storms (usually once in 20 years or more), such as the Sygna storm that hit eastern NSW in May 1974. This storm was named after a shipwrecked Norwegian cargo ship. According to a Manly Daily article from the time, during the Sygna storm, winds reached 166km/h, whipping up waves nine metres high, which in turn caused a massive 2.37-metre tide level and a 0.23-metre storm surge, which barraged its way into Manly, damaging the wharf, destroying the Manly Harbour Baths and ripping up the 335-metre boardwalk to the Manly Aquarium, as if it were made of matchsticks. Ray Mathieson, 67, clearly remembers the Sygna storm. He’s lived in the Manly area since the early ’70s and has owned a waterfront house in Little Manly Cove for the past two decades. ‘‘The Sygna storm was really nasty and [caused] quite a bit of damage especially because logs from the Sygna washed into the harbour,’’ he says. Again in August 1996, Mathieson’s property was bashed by another storm. ‘‘In ’96, one storm was quite severe. A king tide and a storm surge and a big southerly washed away all our pool equipment, the pool walls cracked and we got a boat washed up into our pool. ‘‘I think about nine boats in Little Manly Cove broke their moorings.’’ But have these storm surges, possible coastal erosion and predicted sea-level rises caused Mathieson to worry about his property? ‘‘I am quite optimistic about the effects of global warming,’’ he says. ‘‘I have my own water-level gauge and I’ve seen no change at all in the time I’ve been here. It’s not that I’m not worried about the environment but there are other bigger issues, like sewage treatment and dumping raw sewage in the ocean; to my mind, that’s something to get worked up about.’’ Manly Council is taking the WRL report seriously, the council’s deputygeneral manager, Stephen Clements, says. The report is with the NSW Minister for the Environment, Robyn Parker, and the council has commissioned another report about flooding from rainfall in the Manly local government area, which is due to be completed by August next year. ‘‘We want residents to understand what we are doing – that they have been through the journey with us – and we don’t want to alarm anyone or feel they haven’t been part of it,’’ Clements says. ‘‘The study has involved a lot of door-knocking and surveying residents, so they can give us anecdotal evidence about flooding in the past.’’ But, in general, are residents in the Manly Council area really concerned? ‘‘We have sceptics about climate change; people in favour and against but . . . waterfront properties are still changing hands for more than $10 million, so maybe they’re not that bothered about the future,’’ he says. One of the good guys ... the reintroduced native bush rat seems to be holding its own, breeding again and moving into new locations. Native rat stakes claim on former turf The reintroduction of an indigenous rodent to foreshore areas could help keep feral invaders at bay, writes Keeli Cambourne. Outsider ... the black rat. THE first record of black rats in Sydney is from the 1860s and, like the plague they carried, the introduced rodent has left a wake of destruction in its path. But a study by a Sydney University academic that’s nearing completion may have found a way to combat the black rat, while reintroducing a native species as part of a conservation initiative in conjunction with the Sydney Institute of Marine Science. Early this year, an associate professor in conservation biology at Sydney University, Peter Banks, began reintroducing the native bush rat into areas it once inhabited around Sydney Harbour. ‘‘The black rat brought with it a bunch of diseases, such as rat lungworm, and as it is arboreal, it can climb trees and it decimated native bird populations by raiding their nests,’’ Banks says. ‘‘The bush rat probably disappeared around 1901 when the plague came, and it was around that time that Sydneysiders went on a rat- killing frenzy. ‘‘It is the black rats that live around humans and in houses. What we are trying to do is reverse that pattern and see if we can block the reinvasion of black rats.’’ During a 10-day period, Banks set traps at four locations in bush beside the harbour. His team caught 40 to 60 rats per one-hectare plot and, although it made only a dent in the feral- rodent population, which is estimated to be in the tens of thousands, it was enough to create a gap in their breeding. ‘‘In August, we reintroduced about 100 native rats into those sites – around North Head, Bradleys Head and Middle Head – to see how quickly the black rats may reinvade,’’ Banks says. ‘‘The science is ongoing but the bush rats seem to be holding their own. They are breeding again and have moved into new locations as well.’’ The National Parks and Wildlife Service previously thought the only way to eradicate black rats was to constantly bait them, Banks says, but he is hopeful that once the study has been assessed under peer review, it could help minimise the use of poisons in the bush. The Australian Wildlife Conservancy has also been watching the project and its regional ecologist (south-east), Matt Hayward, says it is exciting for native fauna. ‘‘This study is moving conservation forward in Sydney. Although it’s a bit early to see whether we can call it a success, the early signs are very promising, and the most recent trappings indicate there is more control of the black rat,’’ he says. ‘‘Native species, including birds and bats, have not evolved to cope with this type of predator, and allowing native rodents to re-establish gives the ecosystem more resilience. By reintroducing native species and removing feral predators, it gives us an insight into what Australia was like before settlement.’’ Invasion ... it looks pretty but the sea squirt is one of the many non- indigenous species making Sydney’s waterways home. Photo: SIMS A helping hand for local species Guy Wilkinson A RAPIDLY escalating global population, climate change and an increase in worldwide shipping trade mean more artificial structures are being built around coastlines than ever before. According to a scientific researcher at UNSW and the Sydney Institute of Marine Science (SIMS), Dr Katherine Dafforn, about 50 per cent of Sydney Harbour’sforeshore has been modified by man- made structures. Although the significance of this may be lost on many, the consequences beneath the water’s surface are of particular interest to scientists. Dafforn has been monitoring the impact of non-indigenous species as a threat to estuarine ecosystems. Marine creatures such as barnacles, mussels and other invertebrates – collectively known as ‘‘fouling species’’ – are often delivered to major ports such as Sydney Harbour via recreational and commercial vessels. These creatures then find their way on to structures such as pilings and pontoons, causing ecological problems as they compete with native species for resources such as food and space. The result is increased maintenance and cleaning costs for marina owners. Working with a senior research scientist at the NSW Department of Primary Industries, Dr Tim Glasby, and Associate Professor Emma Johnston, Dafforn has undertaken a series of subtidal dive surveys on artificial and natural structures around Sydney Harbour. She has also examined nearby natural rocky reefs and was able to determine that the reefs were more resistant to foreign invaders than man-made structures. By identifying and understanding ecological changes associated with artificial structures, Dafforn hopes to influence the future design and management of this type of construction. ‘‘By working with relevant agencies and involving the community of local marinas and boat owners, I’d like to continue investigating bioengineering design options for artificial structures that aim to mimic natural habitats and mitigate the impact of artificial structures,’’ she says. ‘‘For example, in Europe, experiments have attempted to ‘seed’ artificial structures with native algae to create habitat opportunities for threatened species. It would be interesting to investigate some of these ideas in the local Sydney context.’’ Glasby agrees the research could have an important part to play in designing structures that are less susceptible to colonisation by invasive species, while being good surrogates for natural habitats that are increasingly under threat from human development. SIMS and the SIMS Foundation gratefully acknowledge the support from the following: SIMS sponsors: Duncan Dovico, DMS Maritime, Gadens Lawyers. SIMS major supporters: Department of Industry, Innov- ation, Science, Research and Tertiary Education, The Ian Potter Foundation, Sydney Harbour Federation Trust, James N. Kirby Foundation. SIMS Foundation founding partners: The Sydney Morning Herald, Sergeants Mess, Thyne Reid Foundation, Orion Exped- ition Cruises, Vincent Fairfax Family Foundation. SIMS Foundation supporters: The Horizon Foundation, The Trust Company.

Upload: others

Post on 19-Oct-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 10 smh.com.au ASSOCIATION WITH THE SYDNEY EDITORIAL ... · Now SIMS is inviting you to play an important role in helping preserve NSW’s unique marine environment for the future

1HERSA1 A010

570 reasons to care about our harbour and coastlineSIGN-UP NOW it’s free »

You will receive the latest news and happenings at SIMS

www.sims.org.au

SIMS aims to be a world-class marine research and training institute

All donations of $2 and over are tax deductible

supporting our marine ecosystems

There are at least 570 species of fishes andthousands of species of other marine creaturesin Sydney Harbour, making it biologically oneof the most diverse harbours in the world.Now SIMS is inviting you to play an importantrole in helping preserve NSW’s unique marineenvironment for the future.

Photo Ezequiel Marzinelli

10 TUESDAY, DECEMBER 4, 2012 smh.com.au The Sydney Morning Herald

EDITORIAL FEATURE IN ASSOCIATION WITH THE SYDNEY

INSTITUTE OF MARINE SCIENCE LIVING HARBOUR: DYNAMIC SCIENCE

Northern shore identified as flood riskResearch into 21 kilometres of Manly and Middle Harbour shoreline has found areas under greatest threat from sea-level increases, erosion or severe storms, writes Melinda Ham.

This would affect alarge number ofseafront properties.

WAVES lash, tides drag the sandaway and the sea levels riseincrementally. Coastalproperties across Australia are atthe mercy of the elements, but isit something to lose sleep over?

A study by engineers from theUniversity of NSW’s WaterResearch Laboratory (WRL) hastried to quantify this risk in themost in-depth study to date,focusing on the ocean andharbour beaches in the Manlylocal government area.

The study looked at thepresent and future implicationsfor 21 kilometres of shorelinewithin Middle Harbour andNorth Harbour, including17 sandy beaches fromQuarantine Beach in the SydneyHarbour National Park to theSpit Bridge.

‘‘The areas most at risk, wherethe seawalls need upgrading, areat Clontarf Reserve and Ellery’sPunt Reserve near the Spit,’’ saysAlessio Mariani, who co-authored the report with fellowengineer James Carley.

These areas are alsovulnerable to inundation, whichmeans they are low-lying andliable to be flooded in future sea-level-rise scenarios and stormsurges.

Mariani says that in a worst-case scenario, such as a once-in-100-years storm with massivewaves, if seawalls and otherprotection works fail, the landbehind the wall will quickly erode.

‘‘The erosion would reachbetween five and 30 metresinland, depending on the area,’’he says. ‘‘This would affect a

large number of roads in theManly local government areaand a large number of seafrontproperties – public as well asprivate – which we can’t name asour report is still with theminister. The erosion would nottake minutes but hours, whichwould give emergency servicestime to put up sandbags toprotect the properties.

‘‘In general, Sydney Harbour isvery resilient,’’ Mariani says.‘‘The oldest seawalls date back tothe 1800s and early 1900s. Theyare an accepted part of the builtenvironment and do a good job.

‘‘While they have beensuccessful for nearly 100 years,our study recommended thatthey be maintained andupgraded to face future risks.Seawalls only prevent erosion to

progress further inland,however, the erosion processstill continues at sea.’’

Using computer modelling,the engineers factored inprojected sea-level rises of40 centimetres by 2050 and90 centimetres by 2100 to

extrapolate different scenarios.They also looked at what

would happen if the seawallscollapsed, and the possibleeffects of major storms (usuallyonce in 20 years or more), such

as the Sygna storm that hiteastern NSW in May 1974.This storm was named aftera shipwrecked Norwegiancargo ship.

According to a Manly Dailyarticle from the time, during theSygna storm, winds reached166km/h, whipping up wavesnine metres high, which in turncaused a massive 2.37-metretide level and a 0.23-metre stormsurge, which barraged its wayinto Manly, damaging the wharf,destroying the Manly HarbourBaths and ripping up the335-metre boardwalk to theManly Aquarium, as if it weremade of matchsticks.

Ray Mathieson, 67, clearlyremembers the Sygna storm.He’s lived in the Manly area sincethe early ’70s and has owned a

waterfront house in Little ManlyCove for the past two decades.

‘‘The Sygna storm was reallynasty and [caused] quite a bit ofdamage especially because logsfrom the Sygna washed into theharbour,’’ he says.

Again in August 1996,Mathieson’s property wasbashed by another storm. ‘‘In’96, one storm was quite severe.A king tide and a storm surge anda big southerly washed away allour pool equipment, the poolwalls cracked and we got a boatwashed up into our pool.

‘‘I think about nine boatsin Little Manly Cove broketheir moorings.’’

But have these storm surges,possible coastal erosion andpredicted sea-level rises causedMathieson to worry about his

property? ‘‘I am quite optimisticabout the effects of globalwarming,’’ he says. ‘‘I have myown water-level gauge and I’veseen no change at all in the timeI’ve been here. It’s not that I’mnot worried about theenvironment but there are otherbigger issues, like sewagetreatment and dumping rawsewage in the ocean; to mymind, that’s something to getworked up about.’’

Manly Council is taking theWRL report seriously, thecouncil’s deputy generalmanager, Stephen Clements,says. The report is with the NSWMinister for the Environment,Robyn Parker, and the council hascommissioned another reportabout flooding from rainfall in theManly local government area,

which is due to be completed byAugust next year.

‘‘We want residents tounderstand what we are doing –that they have been through thejourney with us – and we don’twant to alarm anyone or feelthey haven’t been part of it,’’Clements says. ‘‘The study hasinvolved a lot of door-knockingand surveying residents, so theycan give us anecdotal evidenceabout flooding in the past.’’

But, in general, are residentsin the Manly Council area reallyconcerned? ‘‘We have scepticsabout climate change; people infavour and against but . . .waterfront properties are stillchanging hands for more than$10 million, so maybe they’renot that bothered about thefuture,’’ he says.

One of the good guys ... the reintroduced native bush rat seems to be holding its own, breeding again and moving into new locations.

Native rat stakes claim on former turfThe reintroduction of an indigenous rodent to foreshore areas couldhelp keep feral invaders at bay, writes Keeli Cambourne.

Outsider ... the black rat.

THE first record of black rats inSydney is from the 1860s and,like the plague they carried, theintroduced rodent has left awake of destruction in its path.

But a study by a SydneyUniversity academic that’snearing completion may havefound a way to combat the blackrat, while reintroducing a nativespecies as part of a conservationinitiative in conjunction withthe Sydney Institute of MarineScience.

Early this year, an associateprofessor in conservation

biology at Sydney University,Peter Banks, beganreintroducing the native bushrat into areas it once inhabitedaround Sydney Harbour.

‘‘The black rat brought with ita bunch of diseases, such as ratlungworm, and as it is arboreal,it can climb trees and itdecimated native birdpopulations by raiding theirnests,’’ Banks says.

‘‘The bush rat probablydisappeared around 1901 whenthe plague came, and it wasaround that time that

Sydneysiders went on a rat-killing frenzy.

‘‘It is the black rats that livearound humans and in houses.What we are trying to do is reversethat pattern and see if we canblock the reinvasion of black rats.’’

During a 10-day period, Banksset traps at four locations inbush beside the harbour. Histeam caught 40 to 60 rats perone-hectare plot and, althoughit made only a dent in the feral-rodent population, which isestimated to be in the tens ofthousands, it was enough to

create a gap in their breeding.‘‘In August, we reintroduced

about 100 native rats into thosesites – around North Head,

Bradleys Head and Middle Head– to see how quickly the blackrats may reinvade,’’ Banks says.

‘‘The science is ongoing butthe bush rats seem to be holdingtheir own. They are breedingagain and have moved into newlocations as well.’’

The National Parks andWildlife Service previouslythought the only way toeradicate black rats was toconstantly bait them, Bankssays, but he is hopeful that oncethe study has been assessedunder peer review, it could helpminimise the use of poisons inthe bush.

The Australian WildlifeConservancy has also beenwatching the project and its

regional ecologist (south-east),Matt Hayward, says it is excitingfor native fauna.

‘‘This study is movingconservation forward in Sydney.Although it’s a bit early to seewhether we can call it a success,the early signs are verypromising, and the most recenttrappings indicate there is morecontrol of the black rat,’’ he says.

‘‘Native species, includingbirds and bats, have not evolvedto cope with this type ofpredator, and allowing nativerodents to re-establish gives theecosystem more resilience. Byreintroducing native species andremoving feral predators, it givesus an insight into what Australiawas like before settlement.’’

Invasion ... it looks pretty but the sea squirt is one of the many non-indigenous species making Sydney’s waterways home. Photo: SIMS

A helping handfor local speciesGuy Wilkinson

● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●

A RAPIDLY escalating globalpopulation, climate change andan increase in worldwideshipping trade mean moreartificial structures are beingbuilt around coastlines thanever before.

According to a scientificresearcher at UNSW and theSydney Institute of MarineScience (SIMS), Dr KatherineDafforn, about 50 per centof Sydney Harbour’s foreshorehas been modified by man-made structures.

Although the significance ofthis may be lost on many, theconsequences beneath thewater’s surface are of particularinterest to scientists.

Dafforn has been monitoringthe impact of non-indigenousspecies as a threat to estuarineecosystems. Marine creaturessuch as barnacles, mussels andother invertebrates – collectivelyknown as ‘‘fouling species’’ – areoften delivered to major portssuch as Sydney Harbour viarecreational and commercialvessels. These creatures then findtheir way on to structures such aspilings and pontoons, causingecological problems as theycompete with native species forresources such as food and space.The result is increasedmaintenance and cleaning costsfor marina owners.

Working with a seniorresearch scientist at the NSWDepartment of PrimaryIndustries, Dr Tim Glasby, and

Associate Professor EmmaJohnston, Dafforn hasundertaken a series of subtidaldive surveys on artificial andnatural structures aroundSydney Harbour. She has alsoexamined nearby natural rockyreefs and was able to determinethat the reefs were moreresistant to foreign invadersthan man-made structures.

By identifying andunderstanding ecologicalchanges associated withartificial structures, Daffornhopes to influence the futuredesign and management of thistype of construction.

‘‘By working with relevantagencies and involving thecommunity of local marinas andboat owners, I’d like to continueinvestigating bioengineeringdesign options for artificialstructures that aim to mimicnatural habitats and mitigate theimpact of artificial structures,’’she says.

‘‘For example, in Europe,experiments have attempted to‘seed’ artificial structures withnative algae to create habitatopportunities for threatenedspecies. It would be interesting toinvestigate some of these ideas inthe local Sydney context.’’

Glasby agrees the researchcould have an important part toplay in designing structures thatare less susceptible tocolonisation by invasive species,while being good surrogates fornatural habitats that areincreasingly under threat fromhuman development.

SIMS and the SIMS Foundationgratefully acknowledge thesupport from the following:SIMS sponsors: DuncanDovico, DMS Maritime, GadensLawyers.SIMS major supporters:Department of Industry, Innov-ation, Science, Research andTertiary Education, The IanPotter Foundation, Sydney

Harbour Federation Trust,James N. Kirby Foundation.SIMS Foundation foundingpartners: The Sydney MorningHerald, Sergeants Mess, ThyneReid Foundation, Orion Exped-ition Cruises, Vincent FairfaxFamily Foundation.SIMS Foundation supporters:The Horizon Foundation, TheTrust Company.